I am using DataTables library and I have hard times in receiving data in a proper format so I am trying to adjust it before DataTable library tries to fetch data into table. I have an ajax call which returns an object of the following format:
data:[ [{ Key: "SomeKey" , Value: "SomeValue" } , { ...} ],[...] ]
And my desired output is: data:[ [{ "SomeKey":"SomeValue" } , { ...} ],[...] ]
I have tried JSON.stringify or eval method , but did not worked , also tried those 2 methods when return type was some sort of string but then it inserts \ before " so It does not convert to json. Any help or good tracks would be appreciated.
This has nothing to do with JSON. :-)
data is apparently an array of arrays of objects, where each object has properties valled Key and Value.
If you want to create a new array of arrays of objects, where the objects have a property named by the Key value whose value is the Value value, you can do that like this:
data = data.map(a => a.map(({Key,Value}) => ({[Key]: Value})));
That uses map on the arrays (both the outer and inner ones) and destructuring to pick out the Key and Value properties from each object in the subarrays, and uses computed property names to set the property name on the new object.
In ES5 and earlier, that would look like this:
data = data.map(function(a) {
return a.map(function(obj) {
var newObj = {};
newObj[obj.Key] = obj.Value;
return newObj;
});
});
You should look into Array.prototype.map (mdn)
let data = [[{Key: "SomeKey", Value: "SomeValue"}]];
let output = data.map(a => a.map(({Key, Value}) => ({[Key]: Value})));
console.log(output);
Note the [Key] syntax. To put it simply, whereas var x = 'key'; y = {x: 3} will assign the object {x: 3}, x = 'key'; y = {[x]: 3} will assign the object {key: 3}.
If you're receiving literally the string "data:[ [{ Key: "SomeKey" , Value: "SomeValue" } , { ...} ],[...] ]", then you may trim the first 5 characters ('data:') and then use JSON.parse.
I have an array of objects created by constructor function. These objects have more key-value pairs then this example. But that's all working fine, so not relevant. Let's try to keep it concise :)
Example array:
let contactsArr = [
{id: 1, firstName: "Lucas", email: "lucas#fake.com"},
{id: 2, firstName: "Adrian", email: "adrian#fake.com"},
{id: 3, firstName: "Betrand", email: "zorro#fake.com"}
}
];
In the html, I have a search field #search. You gessed it. This field is intended to search the array of contact objects for any matching values.
The content of this field is trimmed copied to an array of strings, divided by (1 ore more) spaces.
const $input = $("#search").val().toLowerCase().trim().split(/[\s]+/);
No problem there. For next step I wanted to find and return any values of the objects inside contactsArr that are equal to (or contain part of) a string from $input. First version, I came up with this code:
const filteredArr = contactsArr.filter(contact => {
return contact.firstName.toLowerCase().includes($input) ||
contact.email.toLowerCase().includes($input) ||
... // and more key-value pairs to check
});
That works fine when $input returns a string, or an array with only 1 string. If the array contains more strings, only results for the first string will be searched and returned. But it's also a bit messy, considering the objects might have a lot more key-value pairs in the future. Hence version 2:
const filteredArr = contactsArr.filter(contact => {
return Object.values(contact).some(x => {
if (typeof x === "number") x = x.toString();
return x.toLowerCase().includes($input);
});
});
Version 2 returns exaclty the same result as version 1, only it works for a lot more key-value pairs then the ones listed inside the code. Great!! But when the $input array has more then 1 value, the second value is still ignored. After lots of trail and error, I hope someone can point out my mistake.
This is version 3: (or maybe even 33) :)
const filteredArr = contactsArr.filter(contact => {
return Object.values(contact).some(x => {
// contact.id number to string
if (typeof x === "number") x = x.toString();
// match with lowercase (same as $input)
x = x.toLocaleLowerCase();
// check if includes and return true or false
return $input.some(word => x.includes(word));
});
});
Expected result: The aim is to have all the contacts that match any of the strings in $input.
Many thanks for any and all tips and insights!
What I've done in the past is create a big index string by joining all the values together. Then you can use Array.prototype.some() on your $input array
let contactsArr = [
{id: 1, firstName: "Lucas", email: "lucas#fake.com"},
{id: 2, firstName: "Adrian", email: "adrian#fake.com"},
{id: 3, firstName: "Betrand", email: "zorro#fake.com"}
];
let searchVal = 'lu rian'
const $input = searchVal.toLowerCase().trim().split(/\s+/);
const filteredArr = contactsArr.filter(contact => {
// create an index string by joining all the values
const indexString = Object.values(contact).join(' ').toLowerCase()
// now you can perform a single search operation
return $input.some(word => indexString.includes(word))
})
console.info(filteredArr)
I have two arrays. The first one is just a list of some numbers, say, magicNumbers = [1,2,3,15,33]. The second one is an array of objects, all having a property magic, like that: magicObjects = [ { 'magic': 1 }, {'magic: 2}, {'magic': 15} ]
I need to create a new array, containing objects from magicObject, in the same order as value of magic property is in the magicNumbers array, and those places from magicNumbers that that do not have a corresponding object in magicObjects should be filled with null. In our example, this should give:
[ { 'magic': 1 }, {'magic: 2}, null, {'magic': 15}, null ]
It's quite easy to implement it in a straightforward manner with _.map() and _.find():
_.map(magicNumbers,
function(num) {
return _.find(magicObjects,
function(v) { return v.magic == num }
) || null;
});
Any ideas how do it properly in a javascript-way, with underscore.js, or maybe just more effective?
Usually this is done by populating a map id: object and fetching objects from the map as you go. So you get N+M performance instead of N*M:
console.info=function(x){document.write('<pre>'+JSON.stringify(x,0,3)+'</pre>')}
//--
magicNumbers = [1,2,3,15,33];
magicObjects = [ { 'magic': 1 }, {'magic': 2}, {'magic': 15} ];
var mapping = {};
magicObjects.forEach(o => mapping[o.magic] = o);
var result = magicNumbers.map(n => mapping[n] || null);
console.info(result);
I have an array like
vendors = [{
Name: 'Magenic',
ID: 'ABC'
},
{
Name: 'Microsoft',
ID: 'DEF'
} // and so on...
];
How do I check this array to see if "Magenic" exists? I don't want to loop, unless I have to. I'm working with potentially a couple thousand records.
No need to reinvent the wheel loop, at least not explicitly (using arrow functions, modern browsers only):
if (vendors.filter(e => e.Name === 'Magenic').length > 0) {
/* vendors contains the element we're looking for */
}
or, better yet, use some as it allows the browser to stop as soon as one element is found that matches, so it's going to be faster:
if (vendors.some(e => e.Name === 'Magenic')) {
/* vendors contains the element we're looking for */
}
or the equivalent (in this case) find:
if (vendors.find(e => e.Name === 'Magenic')) {
/* same result as above, but a different function return type */
}
And you can even get the position of that element by using findIndex:
const i = vendors.findIndex(e => e.Name === 'Magenic');
if (i > -1) {
/* vendors contains the element we're looking for, at index "i" */
}
And if you need compatibility with lousy browsers then your best bet is:
if (vendors.filter(function(e) { return e.Name === 'Magenic'; }).length > 0) {
/* vendors contains the element we're looking for */
}
2018 edit: This answer is from 2011, before browsers had widely supported array filtering methods and arrow functions. Have a look at CAFxX's answer.
There is no "magic" way to check for something in an array without a loop. Even if you use some function, the function itself will use a loop. What you can do is break out of the loop as soon as you find what you're looking for to minimize computational time.
var found = false;
for(var i = 0; i < vendors.length; i++) {
if (vendors[i].Name == 'Magenic') {
found = true;
break;
}
}
No loop necessary. Three methods that come to mind:
Array.prototype.some()
This is the most exact answer for your question, i.e. "check if something exists", implying a bool result. This will be true if there are any 'Magenic' objects, false otherwise:
let hasMagenicVendor = vendors.some( vendor => vendor['Name'] === 'Magenic' )
Array.prototype.filter()
This will return an array of all 'Magenic' objects, even if there is only one (will return a one-element array):
let magenicVendors = vendors.filter( vendor => vendor['Name'] === 'Magenic' )
If you try to coerce this to a boolean, it will not work, as an empty array (no 'Magenic' objects) is still truthy. So just use magenicVendors.length in your conditional.
Array.prototype.find()
This will return the first 'Magenic' object (or undefined if there aren't any):
let magenicVendor = vendors.find( vendor => vendor['Name'] === 'Magenic' );
This coerces to a boolean okay (any object is truthy, undefined is falsy).
Note: I'm using vendor["Name"] instead of vendor.Name because of the weird casing of the property names.
Note 2: No reason to use loose equality (==) instead of strict equality (===) when checking the name.
The accepted answer still works but now we have an ECMAScript 6 native methods [Array.find][1] and [Array.some][2] to achieve the same effect.
Array.some
Use some If you only want to determine if an element exists i.e. you need a true/false determination.
Quoting MDN:
The some() method tests whether at least one element in the array passes the test implemented by the provided function. It returns true if, in the array, it finds an element for which the provided function returns true; otherwise it returns false. It doesn't modify the array.
Array.find
Use find if you want to get the matched object from array else returns undefined.
Quoting MDN:
The find() method returns the value of the first element in the provided array that satisfies the provided testing function. If no values satisfy the testing function, undefined is returned.
var arr = [
{
id: 21,
label: 'Banana',
},
{
id: 22,
label: 'Apple',
}
]
/* note : data is the actual object that matched search criteria
or undefined if nothing matched */
var data = arr.find(function(ele) {
return ele.id === 21;
});
if (data) {
console.log('found');
console.log(data); // This is entire object i.e. `item` not boolean
}
/* note : doesExist is a boolean thats true or false depending on of whether the data was found or not */
var doesExist = arr.some(function(ele) {
return ele.id === 21;
});
See my jsfiddle link There is a polyfill for IE provided by mozilla
Here's the way I'd do it
const found = vendors.some(item => item.Name === 'Magenic');
array.some() method checks if there is at least one value in an array that matches criteria and returns a boolean.
From here on you can go with:
if (found) {
// do something
} else {
// do something else
}
Unless you want to restructure it like this:
vendors = {
Magenic: {
Name: 'Magenic',
ID: 'ABC'
},
Microsoft: {
Name: 'Microsoft',
ID: 'DEF'
} and so on...
};
to which you can do if(vendors.Magnetic)
You will have to loop
May be too late, but javascript array has two methods some and every method that returns a boolean and can help you achieve this.
I think some would be most appropriate for what you intend to achieve.
vendors.some( vendor => vendor['Name'] !== 'Magenic' )
Some validates that any of the objects in the array satisfies the given condition.
vendors.every( vendor => vendor['Name'] !== 'Magenic' )
Every validates that all the objects in the array satisfies the given condition.
As per ECMAScript 6 specification, you can use findIndex.
const magenicIndex = vendors.findIndex(vendor => vendor.Name === 'Magenic');
magenicIndex will hold either 0 (which is the index in the array) or -1 if it wasn't found.
As the OP has asked the question if the key exists or not.
A more elegant solution that will return boolean using ES6 reduce function can be
const magenicVendorExists = vendors.reduce((accumulator, vendor) => (accumulator||vendor.Name === "Magenic"), false);
Note: The initial parameter of reduce is a false and if the array has the key it will return true.
Hope it helps for better and cleaner code implementation
You cannot without looking into the object really.
You probably should change your structure a little, like
vendors = {
Magenic: 'ABC',
Microsoft: 'DEF'
};
Then you can just use it like a lookup-hash.
vendors['Microsoft']; // 'DEF'
vendors['Apple']; // undefined
const check = vendors.find((item)=>item.Name==='Magenic')
console.log(check)
Try this code.
If the item or element is present then the output will show you that element. If it is not present then the output will be 'undefined'.
Testing for array elements:
JS Offers array functions which allow you to achieve this relatively easily. They are the following:
Array.prototype.filter: Takes a callback function which is a test, the array is then iterated over with is callback and filtered according to this callback. A new filtered array is returned.
Array.prototype.some: Takes a callback function which is a test, the array is then iterated over with is callback and if any element passes the test, the boolean true is returned. Otherwise false is returned
The specifics are best explained via an example:
Example:
vendors = [
{
Name: 'Magenic',
ID: 'ABC'
},
{
Name: 'Microsoft',
ID: 'DEF'
} //and so on goes array...
];
// filter returns a new array, we instantly check if the length
// is longer than zero of this newly created array
if (vendors.filter(company => company.Name === 'Magenic').length ) {
console.log('I contain Magenic');
}
// some would be a better option then filter since it directly returns a boolean
if (vendors.some(company => company.Name === 'Magenic')) {
console.log('I also contain Magenic');
}
Browser support:
These 2 function are ES6 function, not all browsers might support them. To overcome this you can use a polyfill. Here is the polyfill for Array.prototype.some (from MDN):
if (!Array.prototype.some) {
Array.prototype.some = function(fun, thisArg) {
'use strict';
if (this == null) {
throw new TypeError('Array.prototype.some called on null or undefined');
}
if (typeof fun !== 'function') {
throw new TypeError();
}
var t = Object(this);
var len = t.length >>> 0;
for (var i = 0; i < len; i++) {
if (i in t && fun.call(thisArg, t[i], i, t)) {
return true;
}
}
return false;
};
}
Simplest method so far:
if (vendors.findIndex(item => item.Name == "Magenic") == -1) {
//not found item
} else {
//found item
}
My approach to solving this problem is to use ES6 and creating a function that does the check for us. The benefit of this function is that it can be reusable through out your project to check any array of objects given the key and the value to check.
ENOUGH TALK, LET'S SEE THE CODE
Array
const ceos = [
{
name: "Jeff Bezos",
company: "Amazon"
},
{
name: "Mark Zuckerberg",
company: "Facebook"
},
{
name: "Tim Cook",
company: "Apple"
}
];
Function
const arrayIncludesInObj = (arr, key, valueToCheck) => {
return arr.some(value => value[key] === valueToCheck);
}
Call/Usage
const found = arrayIncludesInObj(ceos, "name", "Tim Cook"); // true
const found = arrayIncludesInObj(ceos, "name", "Tim Bezos"); // false
2021 Solution*
Lodash .some (docs) is a clean solution, if you use the _matchesProperty (docs) shorthand:
_.some(VENDORS, ['Name', 'Magenic'])
Explanation
This will iterate through the VENDORS Array looking for an element Object with the Name key having a value of the String 'Magenic'. Once it finds this element, it returns true and stops iterating. If it doesn't find the element after looking through the entire Array, it returns false.
Code snippet
const VENDORS = [{ Name: 'Magenic', ID: 'ABC' }, { Name: 'Microsoft', ID: 'DEF' }];
console.log(_.some(VENDORS, ['Name', 'Magenic'])); // true
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/lodash#4.17.20/lodash.min.js"></script>
* Note that this uses the popular lodash library to achieve the simplest/shortest possible solution. I'm offering this as an alternative to the existing vanilla JS solutions, for those who are interested.
You have to loop, there is no way around it.
function seekVendor(vendors, name) {
for (var i=0, l=vendors.length; i<l; i++) {
if (typeof vendors[i] == "object" && vendors[i].Name === name) {
return vendors[i];
}
}
}
Of course you could use a library like linq.js to make this more pleasing:
Enumerable.From(vendors).Where("$.Name == 'Magenic'").First();
(see jsFiddle for a demo)
I doubt that linq.js will be faster than a straight-forward loop, but it certainly is more flexible when things get a little more complicated.
Correct me if i'm wrong..
i could have used forEach method like this,
var found=false;
vendors.forEach(function(item){
if(item.name === "name"){
found=true;
}
});
Nowadays i'm used to it ,because of it simplicity and self explanatory word.
Thank you.
Functions map, filter, find, and similar are slower than the simple loop.
For me they also less readable than the simple loop and harder to debug. Using them looks like a kind of irrational ritual.
Better have something like this:
arrayHelper = {
arrayContainsObject: function (array, object, key){
for (let i = 0; i < array.length; i++){
if (object[key] === array[i][key]){
return true;
}
}
return false;
}
};
And use it like this with given OP example:
vendors = [{
Name: 'Magenic',
ID: 'ABC'
},
{
Name: 'Microsoft',
ID: 'DEF'
}
];
let abcObject = {ID: 'ABC', Name: 'Magenic'};
let isContainObject = arrayHelper.arrayContainsObject(vendors, abcObject, 'ID');
if you're using jquery you can take advantage of grep to create array with all matching objects:
var results = $.grep(vendors, function (e) {
return e.Name == "Magenic";
});
and then use the results array:
for (var i=0, l=results.length; i<l; i++) {
console.log(results[i].ID);
}
You can use lodash. If lodash library is too heavy for your application consider chunking out unnecessary function not used.
let newArray = filter(_this.props.ArrayOne, function(item) {
return find(_this.props.ArrayTwo, {"speciesId": item.speciesId});
});
This is just one way to do this. Another one can be:
var newArray= [];
_.filter(ArrayOne, function(item) {
return AllSpecies.forEach(function(cItem){
if (cItem.speciesId == item.speciesId){
newArray.push(item);
}
})
});
console.log(arr);
The above example can also be rewritten without using any libraries like:
var newArray= [];
ArrayOne.filter(function(item) {
return ArrayTwo.forEach(function(cItem){
if (cItem.speciesId == item.speciesId){
newArray.push(item);
}
})
});
console.log(arr);
Hope my answer helps.
Many answers here are good and pretty easy. But if your array of object is having a fixed set of value then you can use below trick:
Map all the name in a object.
vendors = [
{
Name: 'Magenic',
ID: 'ABC'
},
{
Name: 'Microsoft',
ID: 'DEF'
}
];
var dirtyObj = {}
for(var count=0;count<vendors.length;count++){
dirtyObj[vendors[count].Name] = true //or assign which gives you true.
}
Now this dirtyObj you can use again and again without any loop.
if(dirtyObj[vendor.Name]){
console.log("Hey! I am available.");
}
To compare one object to another, I combine a for in loop (used to loop through objects) and some().
You do not have to worry about an array going out of bounds etc, so that saves some code. Documentation on .some can be found here
var productList = [{id: 'text3'}, {id: 'text2'}, {id: 'text4', product: 'Shampoo'}]; // Example of selected products
var theDatabaseList = [{id: 'text1'}, {id: 'text2'},{id: 'text3'},{id:'text4', product: 'shampoo'}];
var objectsFound = [];
for(let objectNumber in productList){
var currentId = productList[objectNumber].id;
if (theDatabaseList.some(obj => obj.id === currentId)) {
// Do what you need to do with the matching value here
objectsFound.push(currentId);
}
}
console.log(objectsFound);
An alternative way I compare one object to another is to use a nested for loop with Object.keys().length to get the amount of objects in the array. Code below:
var productList = [{id: 'text3'}, {id: 'text2'}, {id: 'text4', product: 'Shampoo'}]; // Example of selected products
var theDatabaseList = [{id: 'text1'}, {id: 'text2'},{id: 'text3'},{id:'text4', product: 'shampoo'}];
var objectsFound = [];
for(var i = 0; i < Object.keys(productList).length; i++){
for(var j = 0; j < Object.keys(theDatabaseList).length; j++){
if(productList[i].id === theDatabaseList[j].id){
objectsFound.push(productList[i].id);
}
}
}
console.log(objectsFound);
To answer your exact question, if are just searching for a value in an object, you can use a single for in loop.
var vendors = [
{
Name: 'Magenic',
ID: 'ABC'
},
{
Name: 'Microsoft',
ID: 'DEF'
}
];
for(var ojectNumbers in vendors){
if(vendors[ojectNumbers].Name === 'Magenic'){
console.log('object contains Magenic');
}
}
Alternatively you can do:
const find = (key, needle) => return !!~vendors.findIndex(v => (v[key] === needle));
var without2 = (arr, args) => arr.filter(v => v.id !== args.id);
Example:
without2([{id:1},{id:1},{id:2}],{id:2})
Result:
without2([{id:1},{id:1},{id:2}],{id:2})
You can try this its work for me.
const _ = require('lodash');
var arr = [
{
name: 'Jack',
id: 1
},
{
name: 'Gabriel',
id: 2
},
{
name: 'John',
id: 3
}
]
function findValue(arr,value) {
return _.filter(arr, function (object) {
return object['name'].toLowerCase().indexOf(value.toLowerCase()) >= 0;
});
}
console.log(findValue(arr,'jack'))
//[ { name: 'Jack', id: 1 } ]
const a = [{one:2},{two:2},{two:4}]
const b = a.filter(val => "two" in val).length;
if (b) {
...
}
I would rather go with regex.
If your code is as follows,
vendors = [
{
Name: 'Magenic',
ID: 'ABC'
},
{
Name: 'Microsoft',
ID: 'DEF'
}
];
I would recommend
/"Name":"Magenic"/.test(JSON.stringify(vendors))