We Keep Coding

Knockotjs Validation. Passing function gives undefined, because of property order inside VM

validation works fine if validation properties are placed after "HasError" property in VM.
In the case that the property placed before HasError I will get "parameters.hasError" as undefined. I think it's because the property "HasError" is not defined to that time.
Is there any solution without changing the order of the properties inside VM to make it work.
Thanks!
self._BusTypeDefault = function(param) {
var ret = param.BusType;
if(typeof(ret)==='undefined') {
ret = '';
}
else if(ko.isObservable(ret)) {
ret = ret.peek();
}
return ret;
};
self.BusType = ko.observable(self._BusTypeDefault(init)).extend({maxLength: {message: $Resources.PCIBUSError(), maxFieldLength: 255,hasError: self.HasError }});
self._HasErrorDefault = function(param) {
var ret = param.HasError;
if(typeof(ret)==='undefined') {
ret = false;
}
else if(ko.isObservable(ret)) {
ret = ret.peek();
}
return ret;
};
self.HasError = ko.observable(self._HasErrorDefault(init)).extend({errorAggregation: {}});
ko.extenders.maxLength = function (target, parameters) {
//add some sub-observables to our observable
target.hasMaxLengthError = ko.observable();
target.validationMessageMaxError = ko.observable();
//define a function to do validation
function validate(newValue) {
var preValue = target.hasMaxLengthError();
if (newValue.length >= parameters.maxFieldLength) {
target.hasMaxLengthError(true);
target.validationMessageMaxError(parameters.message || "This field is required");
}
else {
target.hasMaxLengthError(false);
target.validationMessageMaxError("");
}
if (parameters.hasError != null && target.hasMaxLengthError() !== preValue && typeof preValue !== 'undefined') {
parameters.hasError(target.hasMaxLengthError());
}
}
//initial validation
validate(target());
//validate whenever the value changes
target.subscribe(validate);
//return the original observable
return target;
};

You can use a function to delay the interpretation of hasError:
this.myObservable = ko.observable(1).extend({ myExtender : { hasError: function () { return self.hasError } } });
Then in the extender you'll need to call the function to actually get the observable behind:
ko.extenders.myExtender = function (target, params) {
function validate(newValue) {
alert("New Value: " + newValue + " ; Has Error: " + params.hasError()());
}
target.subscribe(validate);
}
See this example: http://jsfiddle.net/7ywLN/

How can I convert this to be an extension of the Array Prototype?

http://jsfiddle.net/ryanneufeld/Y8ZNU/
With this example I have created a queue modeled after how I assume google is handling analytics events. The thing is I'd like to convert it to be an extension of the array prototype.
What I'm trying to accomplish is that when you create a new instance of Queue and pass in a queue array, the new instance would act as an array with the extra functions I've added.

might not be perfect but it get the job done: (see the link provided by #Pointy in the comments for a good explanation as to what the pitfalls are)
function pseudoArray(name) {
if (!(this instanceof pseudoArray)) {
return new pseudoArray(name);
}
var self = this;
self.name = name || 'defaultName';
var _push = self.push;
self.push = function(args) {
console.log('"' + name + '" pushing [ ' + Array.prototype.slice.apply(arguments) + ' ]');
_push.apply(self, arguments);
};
return self;
}
pseudoArray.prototype = [];
var x = new pseudoArray('fake array');
x.push('yay', 77, function() { alert('yup'); });
x.push('things');
x.push(12);
console.log(x instanceof Array);
console.log('to string: ' + x);
console.log('length: ' + x.length);
console.log('pop result: ' + x.pop());
console.log('length: ' + x.length);

function log() {
/* workaround for chrome not playing nice and letting me .apply to console */
console.log.apply(console, arguments);
}
var q = q || [[log, 'first item q1']],
q2 = q2 || [[log, 'first time q2']];
// You'll want a console open for this.
function Queue(_q, name) {
var _q = _q || [],
name = name || 'mlQueue';
function processQueue() {
task = _q.shift();
while (task) {
func = task.shift();
func.apply(window, task);
task = _q.shift();
}
}
function init() {
_q._push = _q.push;
processQueue();
_q.push = function() {
//first push it to the array
_q._push.apply(_q, arguments);
processQueue();
};
}
function push() {
console.log(name + ' pushing values');
_q.push.apply(_q, arguments);
};
return {
init: init,
push: push,
run: processQueue,
name: name
}
};
var q = new Queue(q, 'q1');
q.push([log, 'q1 and more']);
q.init();
q.push([log, 'q1 and more']);
var q2 = new Queue(q2, 'q2');
q2.init();
q2.push([log, 'q2 and more']);​

Super in Backbone

When I override the clone() method of a Backbone.Model, is there a way to call this overriden method from my implantation? Something like this:
var MyModel = Backbone.Model.extend({
clone: function(){
super.clone();//calling the original clone method
}
})

You'll want to use:
Backbone.Model.prototype.clone.call(this);
This will call the original clone() method from Backbone.Model with the context of this(The current model).
From Backbone docs:
Brief aside on super: JavaScript does not provide a simple way to call
super — the function of the same name defined higher on the prototype
chain. If you override a core function like set, or save, and you want
to invoke the parent object's implementation, you'll have to
explicitly call it.
var Note = Backbone.Model.extend({
set: function(attributes, options) {
Backbone.Model.prototype.set.apply(this, arguments);
...
}
});

You can also use the __super__ property which is a reference to the parent class prototype:
var MyModel = Backbone.Model.extend({
clone: function(){
MyModel.__super__.clone.call(this);
}
});

Josh Nielsen found an elegant solution for this, which hides a lot of the ugliness.
Just add this snippet to your app to extend Backbone's model:
Backbone.Model.prototype._super = function(funcName){
return this.constructor.prototype[funcName].apply(this, _.rest(arguments));
}
Then use it like this:
Model = Backbone.model.extend({
set: function(arg){
// your code here
// call the super class function
this._super('set', arg);
}
});

Working from the answers given by geek_dave and charlysisto, I wrote this to add this._super(funcName, ...) support in classes that have multiple levels of inheritance. It's worked well in my code.
Backbone.View.prototype._super = Backbone.Model.prototype._super = function(funcName) {
// Find the scope of the caller.
var scope = null;
var scan = this.__proto__;
search: while (scope == null && scan != null) {
var names = Object.getOwnPropertyNames(scan);
for (var i = 0; i < names.length; i++) {
if (scan[names[i]] === arguments.callee.caller) {
scope = scan;
break search;
}
}
scan = scan.constructor.__super__;
}
return scan.constructor.__super__[funcName].apply(this, _.rest(arguments));
};
A year later I've fixed some bugs and made things faster. Below is the code that I use now.
var superCache = {};
// Hack "super" functionality into backbone.
Backbone.View.prototype._superFn = Backbone.Model.prototype._superFn = function(funcName, _caller) {
var caller = _caller == null ? arguments.callee.caller : _caller;
// Find the scope of the caller.
var scope = null;
var scan = this.__proto__;
var className = scan.constructor.className;
if (className != null) {
var result = superCache[className + ":" + funcName];
if (result != null) {
for (var i = 0; i < result.length; i++) {
if (result[i].caller === caller) {
return result[i].fn;
}
}
}
}
search: while (scope == null && scan != null) {
var names = Object.getOwnPropertyNames(scan);
for (var i = 0; i < names.length; i++) {
if (scan[names[i]] === caller) {
scope = scan;
break search;
}
}
scan = scan.constructor.__super__;
}
var result = scan.constructor.__super__[funcName];
if (className != null) {
var entry = superCache[className + ":" + funcName];
if (entry == null) {
entry = [];
superCache[className + ":" + funcName] = entry;
}
entry.push({
caller: caller,
fn: result
});
}
return result;
};
Backbone.View.prototype._super = Backbone.Model.prototype._super = function(funcName) {
var args = new Array(arguments.length - 1);
for (var i = 0; i < args.length; i++) {
args[i] = arguments[i + 1];
}
return this._superFn(funcName, arguments.callee.caller).apply(this, args);
};
Then given this code:
var A = Backbone.Model.extend({
// className: "A",
go1: function() { console.log("A1"); },
go2: function() { console.log("A2"); },
});
var B = A.extend({
// className: "B",
go2: function() { this._super("go2"); console.log("B2"); },
});
var C = B.extend({
// className: "C",
go1: function() { this._super("go1"); console.log("C1"); },
go2: function() { this._super("go2"); console.log("C2"); }
});
var c = new C();
c.go1();
c.go2();
The output in the console is this:
A1
C1
A2
B2
C2
What's interesting is that class C's call to this._super("go1") scans the class hierarchy until it gets a hit in class A. Other solutions do not do this.
P.S. Uncomment the className entries of the class definitions to enable caching of the _super lookup. (The assumption is that these class names will be unique in the application.)

If you want just to call this._super(); without passing the function name as an argument
Backbone.Controller.prototype._super = function(){
var fn = Backbone.Controller.prototype._super.caller, funcName;
$.each(this, function (propName, prop) {
if (prop == fn) {
funcName = propName;
}
});
return this.constructor.__super__[funcName].apply(this, _.rest(arguments));
}
Better use this plugin:
https://github.com/lukasolson/Backbone-Super

I believe you can cache the original method (although not tested):
var MyModel = Backbone.Model.extend({
origclone: Backbone.Model.clone,
clone: function(){
origclone();//calling the original clone method
}
});

backbone._super.js, from my gists: https://gist.github.com/sarink/a3cf3f08c17691395edf
// Forked/modified from: https://gist.github.com/maxbrunsfeld/1542120
// This method gives you an easier way of calling super when you're using Backbone in plain javascript.
// It lets you avoid writing the constructor's name multiple times.
// You still have to specify the name of the method.
//
// So, instead of having to write:
//
// var Animal = Backbone.Model.extend({
// word: "",
// say: function() {
// return "I say " + this.word;
// }
// });
// var Cow = Animal.extend({
// word: "moo",
// say: function() {
// return Animal.prototype.say.apply(this, arguments) + "!!!"
// }
// });
//
//
// You get to write:
//
// var Animal = Backbone.Model.extend({
// word: "",
// say: function() {
// return "I say " + this.word;
// }
// });
// var Cow = Animal.extend({
// word: "moo",
// say: function() {
// return this._super("say", arguments) + "!!!"
// }
// });
(function(root, factory) {
if (typeof define === "function" && define.amd) {
define(["underscore", "backbone"], function(_, Backbone) {
return factory(_, Backbone);
});
}
else if (typeof exports !== "undefined") {
var _ = require("underscore");
var Backbone = require("backbone");
module.exports = factory(_, Backbone);
}
else {
factory(root._, root.Backbone);
}
}(this, function(_, Backbone) {
"use strict";
// Finds the next object up the prototype chain that has a different implementation of the method.
var findSuper = function(methodName, childObject) {
var object = childObject;
while (object[methodName] === childObject[methodName]) {
object = object.constructor.__super__;
}
return object;
};
var _super = function(methodName) {
// Keep track of how far up the prototype chain we have traversed, in order to handle nested calls to `_super`.
this.__superCallObjects__ || (this.__superCallObjects__ = {});
var currentObject = this.__superCallObjects__[methodName] || this;
var parentObject = findSuper(methodName, currentObject);
this.__superCallObjects__[methodName] = parentObject;
// If `methodName` is a function, call it with `this` as the context and `args` as the arguments, if it's an object, simply return it.
var args = _.tail(arguments);
var result = (_.isFunction(parentObject[methodName])) ? parentObject[methodName].apply(this, args) : parentObject[methodName];
delete this.__superCallObjects__[methodName];
return result;
};
// Mix in to Backbone classes
_.each(["Model", "Collection", "View", "Router"], function(klass) {
Backbone[klass].prototype._super = _super;
});
return Backbone;
}));

In the case that you don't know what the parent class is exactly (multiple inheritance or you want a helper function) then you can use the following:
var ChildModel = ParentModel.extend({
initialize: function() {
this.__proto__.constructor.__super__.initialize.apply(this, arguments);
// Do child model initialization.
}
});
With helper function:
function parent(instance) {
return instance.__proto__.constructor.__super__;
};
var ChildModel = ParentModel.extend({
initialize: function() {
parent(this).initialize.apply(this, arguments);
// Do child model initialization.
}
});

Pass the parent class as an option during instantiation:
BaseModel = Backbone.Model.extend({
initialize: function(attributes, options) {
var self = this;
this.myModel = new MyModel({parent: self});
}
});
Then in your MyModel you can call parent methods like this
this.options.parent.method();
Keep in mind this creates a retain cycle on the two objects. So to let the garbage collector do it's job you would need to manually destroy the retain on one of the objects when finished with it. If you're application is pretty large. I would encourage you to look more into hierarchal setups so events can travel up to the correct object.

2 functions below, one requires you pass in the function name, the other can "discover" which function we want the super version of
Discover.Model = Backbone.Model.extend({
_super:function(func) {
var proto = this.constructor.__super__;
if (_.isUndefined(proto[func])) {
throw "Invalid super method: " + func + " does not exist in prototype chain.";
}
return proto[func].apply(this, _.rest(arguments));
},
_superElegant:function() {
t = arguments;
var proto = this.constructor.__super__;
var name;
for (name in this) {
if (this[name] === arguments.callee.caller) {
console.log("FOUND IT " + name);
break;
} else {
console.log("NOT IT " + name);
}
}
if (_.isUndefined(proto[name])) {
throw "Super method for: " + name + " does not exist.";
} else {
console.log("Super method for: " + name + " does exist!");
}
return proto[name].apply(this, arguments);
},
});

Here is how I would do this:
ParentClassName.prototype.MethodToInvokeName.apply(this);
so for your example this is:
Model.prototype.clone.apply(this)

JS: join()-ing an array of objects

Say I have an array of objects that I want to be able to access as hashes sometimes (to change their values, eh?) and sometimes print.
var test = { members : [] };
test.addMember = function(name, value) {
this.members[name] = { name : name, value : value };
this.members[name].toString = function() {
return this.name + " has a " + this.value; };
};
test.toString = function() {
return this.members.join(" and ");
};
test.addMember("a", "a value");
test.addMember("b", "b value");
alert(test);
My Goal here is to have test.toString() return:
a has a value and b has b value
or what-have-you. I was reading on the MDN, and it seems that JavaScript 1.8.5 (or some subrevision) will have a join() that calls toString(). Am I stuck?
Thanks!
EDIT: Here's my FINAL design, with a modify and delete function included (in case anyone was curious)!
var test = {
members : [],
modifyMember : function(name, value) {
var index = this.members.indexOf(this.members[name]);
if(index < 0) {
return;
}
this.members[index].value = this.members[name].value = value;
},
addMember : function(name, value) {
if(this.members[name]) {
this.modifyMember(name, value);
return;
}
this.members[name] = {
name : name,
value : value,
toString : function() {
return this.name + " has " + this.value;
},
};
this.members.push(this.members[name]);
},
removeMember : function(name) {
if(!this.members[name]) return;
this.members.splice(this.members.indexOf(this.members[name]), 1);
delete this.members[name];
},
toString : function() {
return this.members.join(" AND ");
}
};

You are already expanding your Array with properties. Now, just don't forget to populate your Array. Use Array.push():
test.addMember = function(name, value) {
this.members[name] = { name : name, value : value };
this.members.push(this.members[name]);
...
};

One way would be: (members is an object)
var test = { members : {} };
test.addMember = function(name, value) {
this.members[name] = { name : name, value : value };
this.members[name].toString = function() {
return this.name + " has a " + this.value; };
};
test.toString = function() {
var arr=[];
for(var i in this.members) {
if (this.members.hasOwnProperty(i)){
arr.push(this.members[i].toString());
}
}
return arr.join(" and ");
};
test.addMember("a", "a value");
test.addMember("b", "b value");
alert(test.toString());
And another way (members is an array):
var test = { members : [] };
test.addMember = function(name, value) {
var arr= { name : name, value : value };
arr.toString = function() {
return this.name + " has a " + this.value;
};
this.members.push(arr);
};
test.toString = function() {
return this.members.join(" and ");
};
test.addMember("a", "a value");
test.addMember("b", "b value");
alert(test.toString());

Javascript functional inheritance with prototypes

In Douglas Crockford's JavaScript: The Good Parts he recommends that we use functional inheritance. Here's an example:
var mammal = function(spec, my) {
var that = {};
my = my || {};
// Protected
my.clearThroat = function() {
return "Ahem";
};
that.getName = function() {
return spec.name;
};
that.says = function() {
return my.clearThroat() + ' ' + spec.saying || '';
};
return that;
};
var cat = function(spec, my) {
var that = {};
my = my || {};
spec.saying = spec.saying || 'meow';
that = mammal(spec, my);
that.purr = function() {
return my.clearThroat() + " purr";
};
that.getName = function() {
return that.says() + ' ' + spec.name + ' ' + that.says();
};
return that;
};
var kitty = cat({name: "Fluffy"});
The main issue I have with this is that every time I make a mammal or cat the JavaScript interpreter has to re-compile all the functions in it. That is, you don't get to share the code between instances.
My question is: how do I make this code more efficient? For example, if I was making thousands of cat objects, what is the best way to modify this pattern to take advantage of the prototype object?

Well, you just can't do it that way if you plan on making lots of mammal or cat. Instead do it the old fashioned way (prototype) and inherit by property. You can still do the constructors the way you have above but instead of that and my you use the implicit this and some variable representing the base class (in this example, this.mammal).
cat.prototype.purr = function() { return this.mammal.clearThroat() + "purr"; }
I'd use another name than my for base access and store it in this in the cat constructor. In this example I used mammal but this might not be the best if you want to have static access to the global mammal object. Another option is to name the variable base.

Let me introduce you to Classical Inheritance that never uses prototype. This is a bad coding exercise but will teach you the real Classical Inheritance which always compared to prototypal inheritance:
Make a custructor:
function Person(name, age){
this.name = name;
this.age = age;
this.sayHello = function(){return "Hello! this is " + this.name;}
}
Make another cunstructor that inherits from it:
function Student(name, age, grade){
Person.apply(this, [name, age]);
this.grade = grade
}
Very simple! Student calls(applies) Person on itself with name and age arguments takes care of grade arguments by itself.
Now lets make an instance of Student.
var pete = new Student('Pete', 7, 1);
Out pete object will now contain name, age, grade and sayHello properties. It owns all those properties. They are not uplinked to Person through prototype. If we change Person to this:
function Person(name, age){
this.name = name;
this.age = age;
this.sayHello = function(){
return "Hello! this is " + this.name + ". I am " this.age + " years old";
}
}
pete will no recieve the update. If we call pete.sayHello, ti will return Hello! this is pete. It will not get the new update.

if you want privacy and you dont like protyping you may or may-not like this approach:
(note.: it uses jQuery.extend)
var namespace = namespace || {};
// virtual base class
namespace.base = function (sub, undefined) {
var base = { instance: this };
base.hierarchy = [];
base.fn = {
// check to see if base is of a certain class (must be delegated)
is: function (constr) {
return (this.hierarchy[this.hierarchy.length - 1] === constr);
},
// check to see if base extends a certain class (must be delegated)
inherits: function (constr) {
for (var i = 0; i < this.hierarchy.length; i++) {
if (this.hierarchy[i] == constr) return true;
}
return false;
},
// extend a base (must be delegated)
extend: function (sub) {
this.hierarchy.push(sub.instance.constructor);
return $.extend(true, this, sub);
},
// delegate a function to a certain context
delegate: function (context, fn) {
return function () { return fn.apply(context, arguments); }
},
// delegate a collection of functions to a certain context
delegates: function (context, obj) {
var delegates = {};
for (var fn in obj) {
delegates[fn] = base.fn.delegate(context, obj[fn]);
}
return delegates;
}
};
base.public = {
is: base.fn.is,
inherits: base.fn.inherits
};
// extend a sub-base
base.extend = base.fn.delegate(base, base.fn.extend);
return base.extend(sub);
};
namespace.MyClass = function (params) {
var base = { instance: this };
base.vars = {
myVar: "sometext"
}
base.fn = {
init: function () {
base.vars.myVar = params.myVar;
},
alertMyVar: function() {
alert(base.vars.myVar);
}
};
base.public = {
alertMyVar: base.fn.alertMyVar
};
base = namespace.base(base);
base.fn.init();
return base.fn.delegates(base,base.public);
};
newMyClass = new namespace.MyClass({myVar: 'some text to alert'});
newMyClass.alertMyVar();
the only downside is that because of the privacy scope you can only extend the virtual classes and not the instanceable classes.
here is an example of how i extend the namespace.base, to bind/unbind/fire custom events.
// virtual base class for controls
namespace.controls.base = function (sub) {
var base = { instance: this };
base.keys = {
unknown: 0,
backspace: 8,
tab: 9,
enter: 13,
esc: 27,
arrowUp: 38,
arrowDown: 40,
f5: 116
}
base.fn = {
// bind/unbind custom events. (has to be called via delegate)
listeners: {
// bind custom event
bind: function (type, fn) {
if (fn != undefined) {
if (this.listeners[type] == undefined) {
throw (this.type + ': event type \'' + type + '\' is not supported');
}
this.listeners[type].push(fn);
}
return this;
},
// unbind custom event
unbind: function (type) {
if (this.listeners[type] == undefined) {
throw (this.type + ': event type \'' + type + '\' is not supported');
}
this.listeners[type] = [];
return this;
},
// fire a custom event
fire: function (type, e) {
if (this.listeners[type] == undefined) {
throw (this.type + ': event type \'' + type + '\' does not exist');
}
for (var i = 0; i < this.listeners[type].length; i++) {
this.listeners[type][i](e);
}
if(e != undefined) e.stopPropagation();
}
}
};
base.public = {
bind: base.fn.listeners.bind,
unbind: base.fn.listeners.unbind
};
base = new namespace.base(base);
base.fire = base.fn.delegate(base, base.fn.listeners.fire);
return base.extend(sub);
};

To proper use Javascript-prototype based inheritance you could use fastClass https://github.com/dotnetwise/Javascript-FastClass
You have the simpler inheritWith flavor:
var Mammal = function (spec) {
this.spec = spec;
}.define({
clearThroat: function () { return "Ahem" },
getName: function () {
return this.spec.name;
},
says: function () {
return this.clearThroat() + ' ' + spec.saying || '';
}
});
var Cat = Mammal.inheritWith(function (base, baseCtor) {
return {
constructor: function(spec) {
spec = spec || {};
baseCtor.call(this, spec);
},
purr: function() {
return this.clearThroat() + " purr";
},
getName: function() {
return this.says() + ' ' + this.spec.name + this.says();
}
}
});
var kitty = new Cat({ name: "Fluffy" });
kitty.purr(); // Ahem purr
kitty.getName(); // Ahem Fluffy Ahem
And if you are very concerned about performance then you have the fastClass flavor:
var Mammal = function (spec) {
this.spec = spec;
}.define({
clearThroat: function () { return "Ahem" },
getName: function () {
return this.spec.name;
},
says: function () {
return this.clearThroat() + ' ' + spec.saying || '';
}
});
var Cat = Mammal.fastClass(function (base, baseCtor) {
return function() {
this.constructor = function(spec) {
spec = spec || {};
baseCtor.call(this, spec);
};
this.purr = function() {
return this.clearThroat() + " purr";
},
this.getName = function() {
return this.says() + ' ' + this.spec.name + this.says();
}
}
});
var kitty = new Cat({ name: "Fluffy" });
kitty.purr(); // Ahem purr
kitty.getName(); // Ahem Fluffy Ahem
Btw, your initial code doesn't make any sense but I have respected it literally.
fastClass utility:
Function.prototype.fastClass = function (creator) {
var baseClass = this, ctor = (creator || function () { this.constructor = function () { baseClass.apply(this, arguments); } })(this.prototype, this)
var derrivedProrotype = new ctor();
if (!derrivedProrotype.hasOwnProperty("constructor"))
derrivedProrotype.constructor = function () { baseClass.apply(this, arguments); }
derrivedProrotype.constructor.prototype = derrivedProrotype;
return derrivedProrotype.constructor;
};
inheritWith utility:
Function.prototype.inheritWith = function (creator, makeConstructorNotEnumerable) {
var baseCtor = this;
var creatorResult = creator.call(this, this.prototype, this) || {};
var Derrived = creatorResult.constructor ||
function defaultCtor() {
baseCtor.apply(this, arguments);
};
var derrivedPrototype;
function __() { };
__.prototype = this.prototype;
Derrived.prototype = derrivedPrototype = new __;
for (var p in creatorResult)
derrivedPrototype[p] = creatorResult[p];
if (makeConstructorNotEnumerable && canDefineNonEnumerableProperty) //this is not default as it carries over some performance overhead
Object.defineProperty(derrivedPrototype, 'constructor', {
enumerable: false,
value: Derrived
});
return Derrived;
};
define utility:
Function.prototype.define = function (prototype) {
var extendeePrototype = this.prototype;
if (prototype)
for (var p in prototype)
extendeePrototype[p] = prototype[p];
return this;
}
[* Disclaimer, I am the author of the open source package and the names of the methods themselves might be renamed in future` *]