I've got two websites aaa.com and bbb.com. I want to, on button click, postMessage from website aaa.com to website bbb.com but cannot get it done.
I'm calling from aaa.com:
window.postMessage('this is test', 'bbb.com');
and listening on bbb.com:
window.addEventListener('message', function(e) { alert(e.data); }, false);
Please point me where I'm doing it wrong.
;) oh, man , this way it won't work at all, at least to my understanding
maybee this could help you:
read about javascirpt and cross-domain-calls
read about curl
read about $_GET $_POST / $_SERVER - Variables (f.e for php)
try making simple form in php to understand webserver - mechanics
basically if you want to send something to a site, the target-site should have a form (post) / url ( get ) where it accepts this. so you send a HTTP-REQUEST where your parameters/message is UrlEncoded.
i like the basic idea of what you trying to achieve, since this is not "so unrealistic" in application programming .... but the thing which is bothering you i think is the "stateless" http-protocl , and the fact that javascirpt is ClientSide-ONLY ;)
you possibly could build a javascript runnin on the client listening for connection... but thats also out of my scope --- maybee someone else knows ...
hope it helps
cu
Related
I want to get Microsoft user informations like name and email after authentication but I'm a noob at javascript ! The code I use is here : https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory/develop/tutorial-v2-javascript-spa
I can configure the authentication page, but once the user is connected, how to redirect him to another page while transmitting his informations?
I thought about using document.cookie = "user_mail = data.mail" then window.location.href = "mypageafterauthentication" but :
Is this a secure solution? Is it not easy to modify Javascript code and insert bad informations in the cookies?
If this solution is good, where should I put the code in the example script?
Thanks a lot for your answers!
PS : I try to get the code in PHP but it uses Laravel and I don't know this framework. I work with Codeigniter... If someone also know how to use Microsoft Authentication with php I'll be happy to know how to do :)
I am building a simple support chat for my website using Ajax. I would like to check if the user that I am currently chatting with left the browser.
At the moment I have build in that feature by setting interval function at customer side that creates the file with name: userId.txt
In the admin area I have created an interval function that checks if userId.txt exists. If it exists, it deletes it. If the file is not recreated by the custom interval function - next time the admin function will find out that file is not there it mark customer with this userId as inactive.
Abstract representation:
customer -> interval Ajax function -> php [if no file - create a new file]
admin -> interval Ajax function -> php [if file exists - delete the file] -> return state to Ajax function and do something
I was wondering if there is any better way to implement this feature that you can think of?
My solution is to use the jquery ready and beforeunload methods to trigger an ajax post request that will notify when the user arrives and leaves.
This solution is "light" because it only logs twice per user.
support.html
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.11.3/jquery.min.js"></script>
<script>
//log user that just arrived - Page loaded
$(document).ready(function() {
$.ajax({
type: 'POST',
url: 'log.php',
async:false,
data: {userlog:"userid arrived"}
});
});
//log user that is about to leave - window/tab will be closed.
$(window).bind('beforeunload', function(){
$.ajax({
type: 'POST',
url: 'log.php',
async:false,
data: {userlog:"userid left"}
});
});
</script>
</head>
<body>
<h2>Your support html code...</h2>
</body>
</html>
log.php
<?php
//code this script in a way that you get notified in real time
//in this case, I just log to a txt file
$userLog = $_POST['userlog'];
file_put_contents("userlog.txt", $userLog."\n", FILE_APPEND );
//userid arrived
//userid left
Notes:
1 - Tested on Chrome, FF and Opera. I don't have a mac so I couldn't test it on Safari but it should work too.
2 - I've tried the unload method but it wasn't as reliable as beforeunload.
3 - Setting async to false on the ajax request means that the statement you are calling has to complete before the next statement, this ensures that you'll get notified before the window/tab is closed.
#Gonzalon makes a good point but using a normal DB table or the filesystem for constantly updating user movement would be exhaustive to most hard disks. This would be a good reason for using shared memory functions in PHP.
You have to differentiate a bit between the original question "How do i check in real-time, if a user is logged in?" and "How can i make sure, if a user is still on the other side (in my chat)?".
For a "login system" i would suggest to work with PHP sessions.
For the "is user still there" question, i would suggest to update one field of the active session named LAST_ACTIVITY. It is necessary to write a timestamp with the last contact with the client into a store (database) and test whether that is older than X seconds.
I'm suggesting sessions, because you have not mentioned them in your question and it looks like you are creating the userID.txt file manually on each Ajax request, right? Thats not needed, unless working cookie and session-less is a development requirement.
Now, for the PHP sessions i would simply change the session handler (backend) to whatever scales for you and what makes requesting information easy.
By default PHP uses the session temp folder to create session files,
but you might change it, so that the underlying session handler becomes a mariadb database or memcache or rediska.
When the users sessions are stored into a database you can query them: "How many users are now logged in?", "Who is where?".
The answer for "How can I check in real time if a user is logged in?" is, when the user session is created and the user is successfully authenticated.
For real-time chat application there are a lot of technologies out there, from "php comet", "html5 eventsource" + "websockets" / "long polling" to "message queues", like RabbitMq/ActiveMq with publish/subscribe to specific channels.
If this is a simple or restricted environment, maybe a VPS, then you can still stick to your solution of intervalic Ajax requests. Each request might then update $_SESSION['LAST_ACTIVITY'] with a server-side timestamp. Referencing: https://stackoverflow.com/a/1270960/1163786
A modification to this idea would be to stop doing Ajax requests, when the mouse movement stops. If the user doesn't move the mouse on your page for say 10 minutes, you would stop updating the LAST_ACTIVITY timestamp. This would fix the problem of showing users who are idle as being online.
Another modification is to reduce the size of the "iam still here" REQUEST to the server by using small GET or HEADER requests. A short HEADER "ping" is often enough, instead of sending long messages or JSON via POST.
You might find a complete "How to create an Ajax Web Chat with PHP, jQuery" over here. They use a timeout of 15 seconds for the chat.
Part 1 http://tutorialzine.com/2010/10/ajax-web-chat-php-mysql/
Part 2 http://tutorialzine.com/2010/10/ajax-web-chat-css-jquery/
You can do it this way, but it'll be slow, inefficient, and probably highly insecure. Using a database would be a noticeable improvement, but even that wouldn't be particularly scalable, depending on how "real-time" you want this to be and how many conversations you want it to be able to handle simultaneously.
You'd be much better off using a NoSQL solution such as Redis for any actions that you'll need to run frequently (ie: "is user online" checks, storing short-term conversation updates, and checking for conversation updates at short intervals).
Then you'd use the database for more long-term tasks like storing user information and saving active conversations at regular intervals (maybe once per minute, for example).
Why Ajax and not Websockets? Surely a websocket would give you a considerably faster chat system, wouldn't require generating and checking a text file, would not involve a database lookup and you can tell instantly if the connection is dropped.
I would install the https://github.com/nrk/predis library. So at the time the user authenticates, It publishes a message to Redis server.
Then you can set-up a little node server on the back-end - something simple like:
var server = require('http').Server();
var io = require('socket.io')(server);
var Redis = require('ioredis');
var redis = new Redis();
var authenticatedUsers = [];
// Subscribe to the authenticatedUsers channel in Redis
redis.subscribe('authenticatedUsers');
// Logic for what to do when a message is received from Redis
redis.on('message', function(channel, message) {
authenticatedUsers.push(message);
io.emit('userAuthenticated', message);
});
// What happens when a client connects
io.on('connection', function(socket) {
console.log('connection', socket.id);
socket.on('disconnect', function(a) {
console.log('user disconnected', a);
});
});
server.listen(3000);
Far from complete, but something to get you started.
Alternatively, take a look at Firebase. https://www.firebase.com/ if you dont want to bother with the server-side
I would suggest using in built HTML5 session storage for this purpose. This is supported by all modern browsers so we will not face issues for the same.
This will help us to be efficient and quick to recognize if user is online. Whenever user moves mouse or presses keys update session storage with date and time. Check it periodically to see if it is empty or null and decide user left the site.
Depending on your resources you may opt for websockets or the previous method called long pool request. Both ensure a bidirectional communication between the server and the client. But they may be expensive on resources.
Here is an good tutorial on the websocket:
http://www.binarytides.com/websockets-php-tutorial/
I would use a callback that you (admin) can trigger. I use this technique in web app and mobile apps to (All this is set on the user side from the server):
Send a message to user (like: "behave or I ban you").
Update user status/location. (for events to know when attendants is arriving)
Terminate user connections (e.g. force log out if maintenance).
Set user report time (e.g. how often should the user report back)
The callback for the web app is usually in JavaScript, and you define when and how you want the user to call home. Think of it as a service channel.
Instead of creating and deleting files you can do the same thing with cookie benefits of using cookie are
You do not need to hit ajax request to create a file on server as cookies are accessible by javascript/jquery.
Cookies have an option to set the time interval so would automatically delete themselves after a time, so you will not need php script to delete that.
Cookies are accessible by php, so when ever you need to check if user is still active or not, you can simply check if the cookie exist
If it were aspnet I would say signalR... but for php perhaps you could look into Rachet it might help with a lot of what you are trying to accomplish as the messages could be pushed to the clients instead of client polling.
Imo, there is no need for setting up solutions with bidirectional communications. You only want to know if a user is still logged in or attached to the system. If I understand you right, you only need a communication from server to client. So you can try SSE (server sent events) for that. The link gives you an idea, how to implement this with PHP.
The idea is simple. The server knows if user is attached or not. He could send something like "hey, user xyz is still logged in" or "hey, user xzy seems not to be logged in any more" and the client only listens to that messages and can react to the messages (e.g. via JavaScript).
The advantage is: SSE is really good for realtime applications, because the server only has to send data and the client has only to listen, see also the specification for this.
If you really need bidirectional communications or can't go with the two dependencies mentioned in the specs, it's not the best decision to use SSE, of course.
Here is a late Update with a nice chat example (written in Java). Probably it's also good to get an idea how to implement this in PHP.
I've been trying to figure out a way to use notifications on a background process and couldnt find anything online about it. So, I figured out one way around it and wanted to share (Not sure if this is the best way to go about doing this but here goes:)
Problem: I want to notify the user of new info when the page is running but in the background (blurred). I could use alert('new info!'); to get the taskbar icon to flash, but then you have to manually dismiss it (tried it and it's hella annoying). I really liked the notifications, but they only work if the user performs an action, so not helpful...
I hope I won't be telling something stupid, but from where I see it (and remember from school) that's basically how http works : a request is sent to the server, which issues a response eventually after executing some server-side code.
Basically you're asking for a "PUSH" functionality from server to client, and in that case you can't make use of HTTP.
Some tricks exist to work around this limitation, but basically they're all issuing requests at a certain frequency (Dave's answer does exactly that). If your site doesn't change that much, that means a lot of requests are issued for no reason (nothing has changed), consuming bandwith for nothing.
From what I know, the answer to this is called Websockets, which are supported by recent browsers only. I never had the chance to use it though so I couldn't tell much more about it. This allows full duplex communication, thus allowing server to "push" data to the client. I guess that's what SO uses for "new message" notifications (top left of the screen - you see immediately when you receive a new message)
My solution: I made a chrome extension that runs in the background and triggers the notifications. It's a little limited in scope as you need to have chrome to do it, but it does what i need it to, and for the purposes of the problem i'm working on, i can just make my user group use chrome ;D
The specifics: The extension only has two components, the manifest and a script. Currently, i setup the manifest so that it only works on my site using the match identifier... and i set the permissions to include notifications.
The JS script has a window.setinterval that looks for an element in the page with the id NOTIFIER. If it's empty, it does nothing, otherwise it creates a notification based on the content and then clears the content to prevent showing the same notification multiple times... (I tried using .onchange for that element, but couldn't get the event to trigger... I'd prefer to do this on an event rather then setInterval)
Notify.js
function onExtLoad() {
var timer = setInterval(refresh,1000);
}
document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded', onExtLoad());
function refresh() {
if (document.getElementById('NOTIFIER').innerHTML == "") {
//do nothing?
} else {
var notification = webkitNotifications.createNotification("",
"You got a new message",
document.getElementById('NOTIFIER').innerHTML);
notification.show();
document.getElementById('NOTIFIER').innerHTML = "";
}
}
Then, all i need to do is have the JS on the page control when it adds info the the NOTIFIER and voila! notifications!
Hope this helps someone else.
#ExpertSystem: I messed around with the MutationObserver but I can only get it to trigger once. Here's a JSFiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/BTX8x/1/
Am I missing something? Is there a way to reset it?
EDIT: Figured it out, i needed subtree:true
I wrote an Android app that should 'connect' to a (private) forum using HTTP GET (and sometimes POST) requests. The basic idea is as such:
Login page where users submit their credentials. Login is performed by doing a HTTP POST (tried GET too, same result) to the Login page of the forum, with their username and password as the parameters. The request should return some cookies that I store in a BasicCookieStore.
Every page of the forum they want to visit is retrieved using HTTP GET. I parse the HTML source that I obtain and show them only the relevant info. In order to authenticate the users, the same BasicCookieStore that I used for login (step 1) is set as the cookiestore for the HttpClient.
This method has been working all the time during my testing, and has worked for my beta testers too. Now that I released the app, it became apparent that many users were having issues, especially on mobile connections (Wifi seems to be no problem).
By logging the HTML source that was returned in all the HTTP GET requests, I have a strong suspicion that the actual login works fine, but somehow the cookies don't get returned or stored or something in that direction. The problem is that the HTML source of the first page they will receive should be the list of forums. In the case of users with problems however, they get served a page that basically reads "You must enable Javascript to view this page".
The strange thing is, I don't receive that page when testing, nor do many of my users. Even worse: some users are now reporting it worked fine for them for days or weeks, and has now stopped working. Others have the exact opposite: not working for days, suddenly working now. One user has reported he was in Greece for 2 weeks, where it worked flawlessly, then he got back to Germany, and it stopped working again.
There seems to be a random component at play here.
I have tried various things, mostly with the way I do the HTTP GET requests. I started out using the normal DefaultHttpClient, with various settings, such as this:
HttpClient httpClient = new DefaultHttpClient();
// Define parameters
HttpParams httpParams = httpClient.getParams();
HttpConnectionParams.setConnectionTimeout(httpParams, TIMEOUT);
HttpConnectionParams.setSoTimeout(httpParams, TIMEOUT);
HttpProtocolParams.setVersion(httpParams, HttpVersion.HTTP_1_1);
// Set cookiestore (getCookieStore returns the same cookiestore)
HttpContext localContext = new BasicHttpContext();
localContext.setAttribute(ClientContext.COOKIE_STORE, getCookieStore());
HttpGet http = new HttpGet(url);
http.addHeader("Accept", ACCEPT_STRING);
http.addHeader("Content-Type", "application/x-www-form-urlencoded; charset=utf-8");
// Execute
HttpResponse response = httpClient.execute(http, localContext);
//... Process result (omitted)
Now I have switched to using AndroidHttpClient instead, with the rest of the code basically unchanged, and seem to get the same result.
I have also tried using the AsyncHttpClient library, which works quite differently, but once again the same result. I tried using its PersistentCookieStore as well, and you guessed it - same result.
I am clueless at this point. Am I looking in the wrong direction? The fact that a website would respond with "you need to enable Javascript" for some users but not for all seems to indicate an issue with cookies. I don't know how a website determines if javascript is enabled, but surely with a HTTP GET request there is no javascript at play. So why do I (and many other users) get to the page without any problems, while others get the 'no javascript' message? The only reason I can think of is cookies, but I have no clue what the problem exactly is.
Any help would be much appreciated!
I doubt the problem is cookies. More likely is a network configuration problem.
For example, your user might have connected to a wifi hotspot with a captive portal page (which uses javascript to make you sign in before you can use the hotspot). In this case they should first open the browser, try to browse to (e.g.) http://google.com, get redirected, sign in, and then launch your app.
Or, your user might be connecting through a proxy. Many mobile carriers around the world will proxy their users' HTTP connections, sometimes doing horrible things to the content. Switching to HTTPS might help with that.
I am starting to build/design a new single page web application and really wanted to primarily use client-side technology (HTML, CSS, JavaScript/CoffeScript) for the front-end while having a thin REST API back-end to serve data to the front-end. An issue that has come up is about the security of JavaScript. For example, there are going to be certain links and UI elements that will only be displayed depending on the roles and resources the user has attached to them. When the user logs in, it will make a REST call that will validate the credentials and then return back a json object that has all the permissions for that user which will be stored in a JavaScript object.
Lets take this piece of javascript:
// Generated by CoffeeScript 1.3.3
(function() {
var acl, permissions, root;
root = typeof exports !== "undefined" && exports !== null ? exports : this;
permissions = {
//data…
};
acl = {
hasPermission: function(resource, permission, instanceId) {
//code….
}
};
root.acl = acl;
}).call(this);
Now this code setup make sure even through the console, no one can modify the variable permissions. The issue here is that since this is a single page application, I might want to update the permissions without having to refresh the page (maybe they add a record that then needs to be added to thier permissions). The only way I can think of doing this is by adding something like
setPermission: function(resource, permission, instanceId){
//code…
}
to the acl object however if I do that, that mean someone in the browser console could also use that to add permissions to themself that they should not have. Is there any way to add code that can not be accessed from the browser console however can be accessed from code in the JavaScript files?
Now even if I could prevent the issue described above, I still have a bigger one. No matter what I am going to need to have the hasPermission functionality however when it is declared this way, I can in the browser console overwrite that method by just doing:
acl.hasPermission(resource, permission, instanceId){return true;}
and now I would be able to see everything. Is there anyway to define this method is such a way that a user can not override it (like marking it as final or something)?
Something to note is that every REST API call is also going to check the permissions too so even if they were to see something they should not, they would still not be able to do anything and the REST API would regret the request because of permissions issue. One suggestion has been made to generate the template on the server side however I really don't like that idea as it is creating a very strong coupling between the front-end and back-end technology stacks. If for example for whatever reason we need to move form PHP to Python or Ruby, if the templates are built on the client-side in JavaScript, I only have to re-build the REST API and all the front-end code can stay the same but that is not the case if I am generating templates on the server side.
Whatever you do: you have to check all the permissions on the server-side as well (in your REST backend, as you noted). No matter what hoops you jump through, someone will be able to make a REST call that they are not supposed to make.
This effectively makes your client-side security system an optimization: you try to display only allowed operations to the user and you try to avoid round-trips to the server to fetch what is allowed.
As such you don't really need to care if a user can "hack" it: if they break your application, they can keep both parts. Nothing wrong can happen, because the server won't let them execute an action that they are not authorized to.
However, I'd still write the client-side code in a way that it expect an "access denied" as a valid answer (and not necessary an exception). There are many reasons why that response might come: If the permissions of the logged-in user are changed while he has a browser open, then the security descriptions of the client no longer match the server and that situation should be handled gracefully (display "Sorry, this operation is not permitted" and reload the security descriptions, for example).
Don't ever trust Javascript code or the front-end in general. People can even modify the code before it reaches your browser (sniffers etc) and most variables are accessible and modifiable anyways... Trust me: you are never going to be safe on the front-end :)
Always check credentials on the server-side, never only on the front-end!
In modern browsers, you can use Object.freeze or Object.defineProperty to make sure the hasPermission method cannot be redefined.
I don't know yet how to overcome the problem with setPermission. Maybe it's best to just rely on the server-side security there, which as you said you have anyway.