Documentation says we can have only browserAction or pageAction not both. Is there any trick for this? Or as solution is this good idea to use content script and insert button in a page?
There's no mechanism for a single extension to have more than one UI element in Chrome's chrome. You could certainly inject code into a page, and present some UI there, but you won't be able to have both a browserAction and pageAction in a single extension.
You could, on the other hand, have two extensions which communicate with each other via message passing. See chrome.extension.sendRequest for details as to how that might work.
Related
I've done some looking around and couldn't find any solution to this problem.
I'm creating a Chrome extension, with a manifest that points to the opening file home-times.html. This works, though I want to redirect it internally to the other page home-welcome.html inside the extension so it loads another page INSIDE the extension.
I've read a lot of questions that refer to changing the current tab's page, though that's not what I am after.
Tests
By using the following code:
test
Opens a new tab, with the extensions page that I am trying to access in that new tab.
If I got you right, you want to change your popup innerHTML, in this case I suggest using jQuery, to change original file to the result you want.
If you just want to open new tab, with your home-welcome.html, you can do this, in your popup.js :
window.open('home-welcome.html','_blank')
If none of this is what you are looking for, can you please provide an example, I will try to help.
I do have an extension (developed by me). It works fine. However I can't get the idea on how to launch extension from regular button on a web-page.
The main action (opens Chrome Popup) is performed when I click on extension icon.
But I also need to be able to launch extension via button click on website.
Should I send a msg to extension from website via javascript or?
Or I can go in a different way, and insert content from extension popup to website placeholder. A bit awkward working with extensions.
Any advice appreciated.
Thank you.
Unfortunately, it's not possible. But from the looks of it, it may be available soon.
Check out this answer in this thread.
I have a web extension that lets any website access the clipboard. On request I will ask the user if it is okay to give access to the clipboard.
I do this in two ways
I create a notification
The problem: firefox doesn't allow buttons, so in the message I say "Click here to allow website x access". I added an eventlistener to the notification that sends a message back to the content script and it proceeds from there. It's okay but not really the best solution (I want buttons)
As a fallback I have a simple confirm box.
The problem: it doesn't really look good.
Now my other idea is to create a custom confirm box. That means create some html, css and javascript and append it to the DOM. This although is potentionally dangerous as websites can just trigger a "click" on the "allow access"-button then.
So I am basically looking for a nice and safe way to get confirmation from the user.
So what next? iframes? Is it possible to include an html page from the addon with access to a content script in an iframe?
Or is there some other way I can implement this maybe web extensions already offer something like this?
Completely overlooked the click event argument. There is a event.isTrusted property which is false when the event was triggered. (maybe not available in all browsers). But this pretty much solves the issue.
So I decided recently to create a firefox extension I have been thinking about, but do not have any prior experience with it. I read on the official tutorials and figured that the addons sdk seemed to fit me well, but I seem to have hit a hitch using it.
What I want to do is create an options popup dialog, similar to the one you see if you press alt-tools-options. That is, a border with title and close button on the upper part, and a bigger area inside the window where I can define an "intuitive" (default elements with the skin the user is used to) GUI.
The tabs at the top (general, privacy security etc.) is nothing I really need, though would not hurt either.
So the issue is that from my searches, when you use addon sdk, you are not supposed to use XUL which has those elements, but instead you seem to be supposed to create something custom using HTML in a panel. I don't think its possible to create the top-bar akin to the real options-menu when using that, although if I am wrong I would not mind being corrected.
I had a similar issue before, where I wanted a drop-down menu from the toolbar similar to the default ones, which I solved thanks to: How to add a dropdown menu to a firefox addon sdk powered addon toolbar button?.
Might be worth noting that that the button opening the options dialog is one of the menuitems created as described there.
I was considering that it could probably be possible (aka I am not sure) to use something akin to this, but sadly I do not know how I would create a "separate" (drag-able) popup that I could use this on.
If possible, I would prefer there to exist a solution, but if someone knows that it is indeed impossible, please do post that so and I can give up without regrets and just make some sort of custom HTML panel instead :)
tldr:
Is there a way to create a popup dialog similar (in style) to the options window you can open using alt-tools-options in firefox when developing using addon sdk?
Essentially, you aren't supposed to, at least not with the SDK.
But then again, it is still possible, but you need to do a lot of stuff yourself:
You need to register a chrome: package for your add-on, as the resource: URIs the SDK uses internally do not work correctly for XUL windows. Create a Chrome Registration (chrome.manifest file). The SDK supports this since Firefox 24 IIRC.
Create the XUL file. For preferences/options windows, there is already the <prefwindow> binding. Look at other extensions and or the Firefox Options dialog (which is a huge thing with multiple overlays, so better look at other extensions). Place the XUL file in chrome/content/<somefile>.xul. This will then correspond to chrome://<registered_package_from_1>/content/<somefile>.xul.
Implement something that will actually display the window. Normally non-SDK add-ons would just put em:optionsURL into their install.rdf, to have the Add-On Manager automatically create a Preferences button that will open the specified URL, but in the SDK this is generated from package.json and there is no way to put optionsURL in package.json if I'm not mistaken. But you could do other things, like using a simple-prefs type: control button to have a button in your about:addons page, or add it to some browser menu (which would require yet another heap of XUL-modifying, require("chrome") code.). To actually open the dialog, you could use window/utils.openDialog.
Don't forget to close any open windows again when your add-on gets unloaded.
As you can see, not a simple task...
If you're just after preferences in general, consider using simple-prefs.
I really want to make google mail by default bottom posting, in other words, I want the cursor in the textarea in a reply message to move automatically to the bottom.
Is this possible with google chrome extensions?
Have you maybe any other suggestions?
Problems I'm facing:
Run the extension script when gmail is fully loaded
The target textarea is in it's own iframe, is it possible to access it?
Yes, you may use the Content Scripts feature of a Chrome extension in order to manipulate the
page a user is browsing. Your content script code will run in the context of the web page the user is browsing, and it may interact with the host page almost without limit.
Manipulating Gmail might be a bit trickier than most other pages, due to its dynamic nature. Consider using the jQuery .live() method to make it easy bind to the elements you want to manipulate.
With regard to iframes, you just have to turn on the "all_frames" option in your manifest, which "controls whether the content script runs in all frames of the matching page, or only the top frame."
(I know this question is a bit stale, but I thought maybe you'd still appreciate an answer.)
I hope that helps.