WebRTC is a free, open project that enables web browsers with Real-Time Communications (RTC) capabilities via simple Javascript APIs
and i can use this code to Capture my camera,this is the demo
if (navigator.webkitGetUserMedia) {
navigator.webkitGetUserMedia('video', gotStream, noStream);
var video = document.getElementById('monitor');
var canvas = document.getElementById('photo');
function gotStream(stream) {
video.src = webkitURL.createObjectURL(stream);
video.onerror = function () {
stream.stop();
streamError();
};
document.getElementById('splash').hidden = true;
document.getElementById('app').hidden = false;
}
function noStream() {
document.getElementById('errorMessage').textContent = 'No camera available.';
}
function streamError() {
document.getElementById('errorMessage').textContent = 'Camera error.';
}
function snapshot() {
canvas.width = video.videoWidth;
canvas.height = video.videoHeight;
canvas.getContext('2d').drawImage(video, 0, 0);
}
} else {
document.getElementById('errorMessage').textContent = 'No native camera support available.';
}
and now , i want to send my camera stream to other people,
i have already create a chat room using nowjs,
so i want to know , Does the nowjs has method to hold the camera stream and show on
the web-browser,
thanks
The video stream need not be stored anywhere. It is transmitted from one client to the other through a Peer Connection. All you need to do is create such a connection, by transmitting the Signaling Messages (something like a 'Handshake') between the clients. The streaming is taken care by the API.
Related
I'm using the new v2 Twilio Javascript SDK to make calls from the browser to other people.
This works fine but I've been asked to add volume controls for the incoming audio stream.
After some research it seems that I need to take the remote stream from the call and feed it through a gain node to reduce the volume.
Unfortunately the result from call.getRemoteStream is always null even when I can hear audio from the call.
I've tested this on latest Chrome and Edge and they have the same behavior.
Is there something else I need to do to access the remote stream?
Code:
async function(phoneNumber, token)
{
console.log("isSecureContext: " + window.isSecureContext); //check we can get the stream
var options = {
edge: 'ashburn', //us US endpoint
closeProtection: true // will warn user if you try to close browser window during an active call
};
var device = new Device(token, options);
const connectionParams = {
"phoneNumber": phoneNumber
};
var activeCall = await device.connect({ params: connectionParams });
//Setup gain (volume) control for incoming audio
//Note, getRemoteStream always returns null.
var remoteStream = activeCall.getRemoteStream();
if(remoteStream)
{
var audioCtx = new AudioContext();
var source = audioCtx.createMediaStreamSource(remoteStream);
var gainNode = audioCtx.createGain();
source.connect(gainNode)
gainNode.connect(audioCtx.destination);
}
else
{
console.log("No remote stream on call");
}
}
The log output is:
isSecureContext: true
then
No remote stream on call
Twilio support gave me the answer: you need to wait until you start receiving volume events before requesting the stream.
ie
call.on('volume', (inputVolume, outputVolume) => {
if(inputVolume > 0)
{
var remoteStream = activeCall.getRemoteStream();
....
}
});
I'm working on a project which requires the ability to stream audio from a webpage to other clients. I'm already using websocket and would like to channel the data there.
My current approach uses Media Recorder, but there is a problem with sampling which causes interrupts. It registers 1s audio and then send's it to the server which relays it to other clients. Is there a way to capture a continuous audio stream and transform it to base64?
Maybe if there is a way to create a base64 audio from MediaStream without delay it would solve the problem. What do you think?
I would like to keep using websockets, I know there is webrtc.
Have you ever done something like this, is this doable?
--> Device 1
MediaStream -> MediaRecorder -> base64 -> WebSocket -> Server --> Device ..
--> Device 18
Here a demo of the current approach... you can try it here: https://jsfiddle.net/8qhvrcbz/
var sendAudio = function(b64) {
var message = 'var audio = document.createElement(\'audio\');';
message += 'audio.src = "' + b64 + '";';
message += 'audio.play().catch(console.error);';
eval(message);
console.log(b64);
}
navigator.mediaDevices.getUserMedia({
audio: true
}).then(function(stream) {
setInterval(function() {
var chunks = [];
var recorder = new MediaRecorder(stream);
recorder.ondataavailable = function(e) {
chunks.push(e.data);
};
recorder.onstop = function(e) {
var audioBlob = new Blob(chunks);
var reader = new FileReader();
reader.readAsDataURL(audioBlob);
reader.onloadend = function() {
var b64 = reader.result
b64 = b64.replace('application/octet-stream', 'audio/mpeg');
sendAudio(b64);
}
}
recorder.start();
setTimeout(function() {
recorder.stop();
}, 1050);
}, 1000);
});
Websocket is not the best. I solved by using WebRTC instead of websocket.
The solution with websocket was obtained while recording 1050ms instead of 1000, it causes a bit of overlay but still better than hearing blanks.
Although you have solved this through WebRTC, which is the industry recommended approach, I'd like to share my answer on this.
The problem here is not websockets in general but rather the MediaRecorder API. Instead of using it one can use PCM audio capture and then submit the captured array buffers into a web worker or WASM for encoding to MP3 chunks or similar.
const context = new AudioContext();
let leftChannel = [];
let rightChannel = [];
let recordingLength = null;
let bufferSize = 512;
let sampleRate = context.sampleRate;
const audioSource = context.createMediaStreamSource(audioStream);
const scriptNode = context.createScriptProcessor(bufferSize, 1, 1);
audioSource.connect(scriptNode);
scriptNode.connect(context.destination);
scriptNode.onaudioprocess = function(e) {
// Do something with the data, e.g. convert it to WAV or MP3
};
Based on my experiments this would give you "real-time" audio. My theory with the MediaRecorder API is that it does some buffering first before emitting out anything that causes the observable delay.
I am recording browser audio input from the microphone, and sending it via websocket to a nodeJs service that writes the stream to a .wav file.
My problem is that the first recording comes out fine, but any subsequent recordings come out sounding very slow, about half the speed and are therefore unusable.
If I refresh the browser the first recording works again, and subsequent recordings are slowed down which is why I am sure the problem is not in the nodeJs service.
My project is an Angular 5 project.
I have pasted the code I am trying below.
I am using binary.js ->
https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/binaryjs/0.2.1/binary.min.js
this.client = BinaryClient(`ws://localhost:9001`)
createStream() {
window.Stream = this.client.createStream();
window.navigator.mediaDevices.getUserMedia({ audio: true }).then(stream => {
this.success(stream);
})
}
stopRecording() {
this.recording = false;
this.win.Stream.end();
}
success(e) {
var audioContext = window.AudioContext || window.webkitAudioContext;
var context = new audioContext();
// the sample rate is in context.sampleRate
var audioInput = context.createMediaStreamSource(e);
var bufferSize = 2048;
var recorder = context.createScriptProcessor(bufferSize, 1, 1);
}
recorder.onaudioprocess = (e) => {
if (!this.recording) return;
console.log('recording');
var left = e.inputBuffer.getChannelData(0);
this.win.Stream.write(this.convertoFloat32ToInt16(left));
}
audioInput.connect(recorder)
recorder.connect(context.destination);
}
convertoFloat32ToInt16(buffer) {
var l = buffer.length;
var buf = new Int16Array(l)
while (l--) {
buf[l] = buffer[l] * 0xFFFF; //convert to 16 bit
}
return buf.buffer
}
I am stumped as to what can be going wrong so if anyone has experience using this browser tech I would appreciate any help.
Thanks.
I've had this exact problem - your problem is the sample rate you are writing your WAV file with is incorrect.
You need to pass the sample rate used by the browser and the microphone to the node.js which writes the binary WAV file.
Client side:
After a successfull navigator.mediaDevices.getUserMedia (in your case, success function), get the sampleRate variable from the AudioContext element:
var _smapleRate = context.sampleRate;
Then pass it to the node.js listener as a parameter. In my case I used:
binaryClient.createStream({ SampleRate: _smapleRate });
Server (Node.js) side:
Use the passed SampleRate to set the WAV file's sample rate. In my case this is the code:
fileWriter = new wav.FileWriter(wavPath, {
channels: 1,
sampleRate: meta.SampleRate,
bitDepth: 16
});
This will prevent broken sounds, low pitch sounds, low or fast WAV files.
Hope this helps.
I'm working on a project and I require to send an audio stream to a Node.js server. I'm able to capture microphone sound with this function:
function micCapture(){
'use strict';
navigator.getUserMedia = navigator.getUserMedia || navigator.webkitGetUserMedia || navigator.mozGetUserMedia;
var constraints = {
audio: true,
video: false
};
var video = document.querySelector('video');
function successCallback(stream) {
window.stream = stream; // stream available to console
if (window.URL) {
video.src = window.webkitURL.createObjectURL(stream);
} else {
video.src = stream;
}
//Send audio stream
//server.send(stream);
}
function errorCallback(error) {
console.log('navigator.getUserMedia error: ', error);
}
navigator.getUserMedia(constraints, successCallback, errorCallback);
}
As you can see, I'm able to capture audio and play it on the website.
Now I want to send that audio stream to a Node.js server, and send it back to other clients. Like a voicechat, but I don't want to use WebRTC as I need the stream in the server. How can I achieve this? Can I use socket.io-stream to do this? In the examples I saw, they recorded the audio, and sent a file, but I need "live" audio.
I have recently done live audio upload using socket.io from browser to server. I am going to answer here in case someone else needs it.
var stream;
var socket = io();
var bufferSize = 1024 * 16;
var audioContext = new AudioContext();
// createScriptProcessor is deprecated. Let me know if anyone find alternative
var processor = audioContext.createScriptProcessor(bufferSize, 1, 1);
processor.connect(audioContext.destination);
navigator.mediaDevices.getUserMedia({ video: false, audio: true }).then(handleMicStream).catch(err => {
console.log('error from getUserMedia', err);
});
handleMicStream will run when user accepts the permission to use microphone.
function handleMicStream(streamObj) {
// keep the context in a global variable
stream = streamObj;
input = audioContext.createMediaStreamSource(stream);
input.connect(processor);
processor.onaudioprocess = e => {
microphoneProcess(e); // receives data from microphone
};
}
function microphoneProcess(e) {
const left = e.inputBuffer.getChannelData(0); // get only one audio channel
const left16 = convertFloat32ToInt16(left); // skip if you don't need this
socket.emit('micBinaryStream', left16); // send to server via web socket
}
// Converts data to BINARY16
function convertFloat32ToInt16(buffer) {
let l = buffer.length;
const buf = new Int16Array(l / 3);
while (l--) {
if (l % 3 === 0) {
buf[l / 3] = buffer[l] * 0xFFFF;
}
}
return buf.buffer;
}
Have your socket.io server listen to micBinaryStream and you should get the data. I needed the data as a BINARY16 format for google api if you do not need this you can skip the function call to convertFloat32ToInt16().
Important
When you need to stop listening you MUST disconnect the the processor and end the stream. Run the function closeAll() below.
function closeAll() {
const tracks = stream ? stream.getTracks() : null;
const track = tracks ? tracks[0] : null;
if (track) {
track.stop();
}
if (processor) {
if (input) {
try {
input.disconnect(processor);
} catch (error) {
console.warn('Attempt to disconnect input failed.');
}
}
processor.disconnect(audioContext.destination);
}
if (audioContext) {
audioContext.close().then(() => {
input = null;
processor = null;
audioContext = null;
});
}
}
it's an old time question, i see. I'm doing the same thing (except my server doesn't run node.js and is written in C#) and stumbled upon this.
Don't know if someone is still interested but i've elaborated a bit. The current alternative to the deprecated createScriptProcessor is the AudioWorklet interface.
From: https://webaudio.github.io/web-audio-api/#audioworklet
1.32.1. Concepts
The AudioWorklet object allows developers to supply scripts (such as JavaScript or >WebAssembly code) to process audio on the rendering thread, supporting custom >AudioNodes. This processing mechanism ensures synchronous execution of the script >code with other built-in AudioNodes in the audio graph.
You cannot implement interfaces in Javascript as far as i know but you can extend a class derived from it.
And the one we need is: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/AudioWorkletProcessor
So i did write a processor that just mirrors the output with the input values and displays them.
class CustomAudioProcessor extends AudioWorkletProcessor {
process (inputs, outputs, parameters) {
const input = inputs[0];
const output = output[0];
for (let channel = 0; channel < input.length; ++channel) {
for (let i = 0; i < input[channel].length; ++i) {
// Just copying all the data from input to output
output[channel][i] = input[channel][i];
// The next one will make the app crash but yeah, the values are there
// console.log(output[channel][i]);
}
}
}
}
The processor must then be placed into the audio pipeline, after the microphone and before the speakers.
function record() {
constraints = { audio: true };
navigator.mediaDevices.getUserMedia(constraints)
.then(function(stream) {
audioCtx = new AudioContext();
var source = audioCtx.createMediaStreamSource(stream);
audioCtx.audioWorklet.addModule("custom-audio-processor.js").then(() => {
customAudioProcessor = new AudioWorkletNode(audioCtx, "custom-audio-processor");
source.connect(customAudioProcessor);
customAudioProcessor.connect(audioCtx.destination);
})
audioCtx.destination.play();
Works! Good luck! :)
I am sending RTP video data from an Android phone to my computer. The RTP streaming works, proven with ffplay.
Now I'm trying to receive and display the stream inside Chrome (63.0.3239.84, Win10, 64Bit). I receive the RTP packets with node.js and pass them to all connected users with help of socket.io.
To display the video in an HTML5 <video>-tag, I tried a similar approach as the example in the docs of the MediaSource API. This is, what i've tried to append the video data on the fly:
var socket = io();
var ms = new MediaSource();
var mimeCodec = 'video/mp4; codecs="avc1.42C01E"';
var queue = [];
var video = document.querySelector('video');
// receiving the rtp-packets from android, forwarded by nodes socket.io
socket.on('video-fragment', function(fragment) {
queue.push(fragment.slice(11)); // cutting of rtp header to get plain NAL units
});
video.src = URL.createObjectURL(ms);
var timeout = 500;
var appendChunk = function() {
if(queue.length > 0) {
timeout = 500;
var append = function() {
var sb = ms.addSourceBuffer(mimeCodec);
sb.appendBuffer(queue.shift());
sb.addEventListener('updateend', function() {
if(video.paused) {
console.log("try to start video");
video.play();
}
appendChunk();
});
ms.removeSourceBuffer(sb);
};
if(ms.readyState == "open") {
append();
} else {
ms.addEventListener('sourceopen', function() {
appendChunk();
});
}
} else {
setTimeout(appendChunk, timeout); // try again after some timeout...
timeout *= 2;
}
}
appendChunk(); // start recursive call
<video></video>
However, I don't get any errors from my video-object. If I close the MediaSource at some point with ms.endOfStream() and try to start the video after that, I get a MediaError with code 4: DEMUXER_ERROR_COULD_NOT_OPEN.
Any suggestions? Am I somehow on the right way? Or is this kind of video streaming not possible in Chrome and the only way of "live streaming" would be with using a playlist and video-file-chunks?
The browser only supports video in an mp4 (or webm) container. It does not support the rtp protocol. It must be repackaged to a format the browser supports.