pushState support was introduced with Backbone.js' version 0.5 update.
From the backbone documentation:
Note that using real URLs requires your web server to be able to
correctly render those pages, so back-end changes are required as
well. For example, if you have a route of /documents/100, your web
server must be able to serve that page, if the browser visits that URL
directly. For full search-engine crawlability, it's best to have the
server generate the complete HTML for the page ... but if it's a web
application, just rendering the same content you would have for the
root URL, and filling in the rest with Backbone Views and JavaScript
works fine.
This may seem like a trivial question, but I'm wondering if anyone can help me with some specific (preferably express) node.js server code. How should I go about handling these routes? I'm a little confused.
Here's the relevant excerpt from my app's router module:
var Router = Backbone.Router.extend({
routes: {
'': 'index',
'about': 'about'
},
index: function() {
indexView.render();
},
about: function() {
aboutView.render();
}
});
var initialize = function() {
var router = new Router;
Backbone.history.start({ pushState: true });
}
return {
initialize: initialize
};
I only have a top-level route and a route for an about page here. So how should I set up a node server that will allow me to navigate to:
domain.com
domain.com/about
domain.com/#/about // <- for browsers that don't support pushState
Explanation
First, you need to know that domain.com/#/about will call the '/' route of your server because it doesn't read the # fragment. Your server will render the base of your Backbone.js application and Backbone will trigger the 'about' route.
So, you need to declare two routes in Express JS:
/
/about
Code
app.get('/', function(req, res) {
// Trigger the routes 'domain.com' and 'domain.com/#/about'
// Here render the base of your application
});
app.get('/about', function (req, res) {
// Trigger the route 'domain.com/about'
// Here use templates to generate the right view and render
});
I recommend you 3 links for SEO compatibility with Backbone.js by Derick Bailey:
SEO And Accessibility With HTML5 PushState, Part 1: Introducing PushState: http://lostechies.com/derickbailey/2011/09/26/seo-and-accessibility-with-html5-pushstate-part-1-introducing-pushstate/
SEO And Accessibility With HTML5 PushState, Part 2: Progressive Enhancement With Backbone.js: http://lostechies.com/derickbailey/2011/09/26/seo-and-accessibility-with-html5-pushstate-part-2-progressive-enhancement-with-backbone-js/
SEO And Accessibility With HTML5 PushState, Part 3: The Video: http://lostechies.com/derickbailey/2011/10/06/seo-and-accessibility-with-html5-pushstate-part-3-the-video/
Related
I already searched for a good while on the Internet and even checked all suggested questions here, but I found nothing.
Basically, I'm using vue-router to load views when the user clicks on them (without prefetching, just lazy-loading), using a function that imports the Vue view/component. To better visualize, I made a barebone example of what I'm doing:
const router = new VueRouter({
routes: [
...
{
path: "/a_page",
component: function() {
return import("./views/A_Page.vue");
}
}
]
});
I'm using Express in the backend to protect certain routes, because protecting it in the Frontend is wasted effort, since the user could bypass the 'protection' easily, if he wants to. Also all views have their own splitted .js file (using "webpackChunkName") and Express needs a Bearer Authentication Token header for every API call OR .js file requested. This works great with Axios (responsible for fetching API data) where you can manually define a header, but vue-router hasn't this option, and since it doesn't send the Authorization header, it doesn't authenticate, Express blocks the file with a 403 and vue-router fails to import the file.
Is there any way to send the Authorization header with the import (which is basically just a GET request)?
Thanks in advance.
If someone thinks I'm approaching the problem in a wrong way, feel free to comment and suggest another way.
EDIT: The suggested duplicate question was given too little attention and the only solution given (which is basically split in 2) doesn't work with the current webpack anymore; onload(event) and onerror(event) get undefined.
You could use a router guard instead of protecting with basic auth.
I use this method, along with lazy loaded routes. If the auth fails you can redirect the user to a login page.
const router = new VueRouter({ ... })
router.beforeEach((to, from, next) => {
If (auth) { // get value of cookie etc for a jwt token or similar auth method
next() // proceed
}
else {
next(false) // cancel navigation
// or
next(“/login-url”) // redirect you login url
}
})
Additionally, you could use an axios method to auth on each route change.
If you want to send up the Authorization header (which doesn't seem to be an easy task, given that no one knows how to go about it...) I think you could override webpack's jsonp function that it uses to load the chunks in splitChunks...
Here's the docs for the webpack function that loads the chunks
You'll override your webpack config with your modified chunk loading function and then tie that into your vue.config.js like so...
// vue.config.js
module.exports = {
configureWebpack: require('./webpack.config.js')
}
All this being said, I would suggest protecting your frontend assets much earlier than when you need to be loading your split chunks and not requiring the Authorization header to serve your static assets.
Sometimes you can do this at the network layer (load balancer, etc) depending on your use-case. Other times using a server-based approach, like rendering your app w/ Nuxt, will be what you want.
If I'm understanding correctly (feel free to correct me), would you be able to do an auth call with axios prior to the actual routing, or perhaps upon the routing using a mounted call? Especially if there is no valid authentication you can then either redirect to a login page or re-route to an error page.
Feel free to let me know if I'm misunderstanding.
So I'm working on a project that incorporates React, Express.js+Passport and Webpack. I understand the concept of pushing everything to a 'master' React component via react-router, then letting it hash out what gets displayed for the given route. That would work great here, I think. To be upfront, I am new to React.
My concerns are:
1) Can I/how can I still use Passport to authenticate my routes? If I understand react-router correctly, I'll have one route in my express app.js file, pointing to, say, a React component named <Application/>. However, Passport needs router.get('/myroute', isAuthenticated, callback) to check the session. Is it still possible to do so with react-router?
2) Furthermore, if this is possible, how do I pass values from the route in Express into my views, in React? I know in a typical view, I could use <%= user %> or {{user}} if I passed that from my route. Is that possible here?
Split a view rendering path from API paths. After all you can set the authentication logic into api calls.
//Auth check middleware
function isAuth(req, res, next) {...}
//API routes
app.post("api/users/login", function() {...});
app.post("api/users/logout", function() {...});
app.get("api/purchases", isAuth, function() {...});
//and so on...
//Wild card view render route
app.use(function(req, res) {
var router = Router.create({
onAbort: function(options) {...},
onError: function(error) {...},
routes: //your react routes
location: req.url
});
router.run(function(Handler) {
res.set("Content-Type", "text/html");
res.send(React.renderToString(<Handler/>));
});
});
So you have to solve how you're going to pass server side rendered data in views to a client side (choose your isomorphic data transferring technique).
You can also create views and the redirection logic on a client side only and firstly render react components in an "awaiting" state that will be resolved on a client after a component will be mounted (check auth state via an API call).
I am an absolute noob, so bear with me. I am developing an app with angular and express. I am using ui.router for the angular routing and express to serve the pages.
I've used the following lines to enable html5 mode, which has successfully removed the pound sign (#) from the urls, however when hitting f5, only the view gets loaded, and not the index which should wrap the view.
$locationProvider.html5Mode(true).hashPrefix('!');
$urlRouterProvider.otherwise('home');
I tried adding the following lines as suggested online, but now the ui router is loading the index page itself in the view (looks like 2 layers of an infinity mirror, if that makes sense).
router.all("/*", function(req, res) {
res.render("index", { user : req.user });
});
I've seen res.sendfile used in examples, but I haven't had any success with that, either.
How can I use Angular's ui router, and express in html5mode without breaking my page? I can gladly give more code if needed.
Edit: more info!
Express serves the index page when '/' is requested.
router.get('/', function (req, res) {
res.render('index', { user : req.user });
});
The index page simply contains
""
which in turn shows the contents of which view I want to show.
EDIT: I have uploaded my project to github. https://github.com/shhtephe/SurfacingSolutions
The files I think you'll most need to see are routes/index.js and views/index.ejs
Hope that helps.
I currently have a set-up based on the meanjs stack boilerplate where I can have users logged in this state of being 'logged-in' stays as I navigate the URLs of the site. This is due to holding the user object in a Service which becomes globally available.
However this only works if I navigate from my base root, i.e. from '/' and by navigation only within my app.
If I manually enter a URL such as '/page1' it loses the global user object, however if I go to my root homepage and navigate to '/page1' via the site. Then it's fine, it sees the global user object in the Service object.
So I guess this happens due to the full page refresh which loses the global value where is navigating via the site does not do a refresh so you keep all your variables.
Some things to note:
I have enabled HTML5Mode, using prefix of '!'.
I use UI-Router
I use a tag with '/'
I have a re-write rule on express that after loading all my routes, I have one last route that takes all '/*' to and sends back the root index.html file, as that is where the angularjs stuff is.
I'm just wondering what people generally do here? Do they revert the standard cookies and local storage solutions? I'm fairly new to angular so I am guessing there are libraries out there for this.
I just would like to know what the recommended way to deal with this or what the majority do, just so I am aligned in the right way and angular way I suppose.
Update:
If I manually navigate to another URL on my site via the address bar, I lose my user state, however if I manually go back to my root via the address bar, my user state is seen again, so it is not simply about loosing state on window refresh. So it seems it is related to code running on root URL.
I have an express re-write that manually entered URLs (due to HTML5 Location Mode) should return the index.html first as it contains the AngularJs files and then the UI-Route takes over and routes it properly.
So I would have expected that any code on the root would have executed anyway, so it should be similar to navigating via the site or typing in the address bar. I must be missing something about Angular that has this effect.
Update 2
Right so more investigation lead me to this:
<script type="text/javascript">
var user = {{ user | json | safe }};
</script>
Which is a server side code for index.html, I guess this is not run when refreshing the page to a new page via a manual URL.
Using the hash bang mode, it works, which is because with hash bang mode, even I type a URL in the browser, it does not cause a refresh, where as using HTML5 Mode, it does refresh. So right now the solution I can think of is using sessionStorage.
Unless there better alternatives?
Update 3:
It seems the best way to handle this when using HTML5Mode is that you just have to have a re-write on the express server and few other things.
I think you have it right, but you may want to look at all the routes that your app may need and just consider some basic structure (api, user, session, partials etc). It just seems like one of those issues where it's as complicated as you want to let it become.
As far as the best practice you can follow the angular-fullstack-generator or the meanio project.
What you are doing looks closest to the mean.io mostly because they also use the ui-router, although they seem to have kept the hashbang and it looks like of more of an SEO friendly with some independant SPA page(s) capability.
You can probably install it and find the code before I explained it here so -
npm install -g meanio
mean init name
cd [name] && npm install
The angular-fullstack looks like this which is a good example of a more typical routing:
// Server API Routes
app.route('/api/awesomeThings')
.get(api.awesomeThings);
app.route('/api/users')
.post(users.create)
.put(users.changePassword);
app.route('/api/users/me')
.get(users.me);
app.route('/api/users/:id')
.get(users.show);
app.route('/api/session')
.post(session.login)
.delete(session.logout);
// All undefined api routes should return a 404
app.route('/api/*')
.get(function(req, res) {
res.send(404);
});
// All other routes to use Angular routing in app/scripts/app.js
app.route('/partials/*')
.get(index.partials);
app.route('/*')
.get( middleware.setUserCookie, index.index);
The partials are then found with some regex for simplicity and delivered without rendering like:
var path = require('path');
exports.partials = function(req, res) {
var stripped = req.url.split('.')[0];
var requestedView = path.join('./', stripped);
res.render(requestedView, function(err, html) {
if(err) {
console.log("Error rendering partial '" + requestedView + "'\n", err);
res.status(404);
res.send(404);
} else {
res.send(html);
}
});
};
And the index is rendered:
exports.index = function(req, res) {
res.render('index');
};
In the end I did have quite a bit of trouble but managed to get it to work by doing few things that can be broken down in to steps, which apply to those who are using HTML5Mode.
1) After enabling HTML5Mode in Angular, set a re-write on your server so that it sends back your index.html that contains the Angular src js files. Note, this re-write should be at the end after your static files and normal server routes (e.g. after your REST API routes).
2) Make sure that angular routes are not the same as your server routes. So if you have a front-end state /user/account, then do not have a server route /user/account otherwise it will not get called, change your server-side route to something like /api/v1/server/route.
3) For all anchor tags in your front-end that are meant to trigger a direct call to the server without having to go through Angular state/route, make sure you add a 'target=_self'.
I'm trying to use HTML5 push state links with my Angular app. What I have is a series of routes similar to the following
$stateProvider.state('product', {
url: '/product/:productCode',
templateUrl: 'product/product.html',
controller: 'ProductCtrl'
}
});
This works when I navigate to [host]/#/product/ABC123 - It displays the url in the browser as /product/ABC123, then when I start clicking through to my other routes (using ui-sref) everything works as expected.
However - I'd like the ability to both refresh the browser, and remain in the same state, as well as be able to copy and paste that link and route to the right state.
eg. If I got to [host]/product/ABC123 - I want to display the content from the #/product/ABC123 route. Currently, this will give me a not found.
I'm using nginx as my app server. I believe I'll have to add something to handle it at that level, but I'm not sure where to start.
The issue you have is that your server does not know how to respond to /product/ABC123.
I am currently using node.js for my backend with angular, and to solve this I return the angular app for all routes, not just the usual root route for example.
So you might have used something like this in the past:
app.get('/', ...);
Which would have returned the angular app just for the root route. Now I use something like:
app.get('*', ...);
Which will return the angular app for all routes.
I should have mentioned that this can act as a catch all placed after other routes such as for static files. Another alternative is to mark all the routes you want specifically for the angular app, eg:
app.get('/', ...); app.get('/product/:productId', ...); etc