So you have one list and another. One is used for navigation, the other meta data.
Now, the idea is that a user will be adding, reordering, and deleting items in the nav list, and the meta list should be updated to reflect what's going on in the nav list. By adding an item to the nav list, a chunk of HTML is appended to the meta list.
Keep in mind I'll be using jQuery.
So the thing im questioning is the best way to establish relationships between the sets of elements. Now I realize I can use indexes and :eq() etc, but in a complicated implementation with lots of containers, things can get hairy... and coming back months or years down the road to do maintenance could be painful.
Just wondering if people had suggestions for establishing clear relationships. Storing id's in hidden fields? Some kind of master array?
The way you are thinking about this will likely produce some spaghetti looking code. I highly recommend you take a look at an MVC framework like backbone.js < http://documentcloud.github.com/backbone/ > Backbone has a powerful event model that will make it easy for one chunk of UI code to broadcast events to other chunks of UI code.
Using backbone, you could use a model to track the state of your items. You can then have modular views "subscribe" to add/remove/change events on the model.
Backbone literally was built to solve the problem you are facing with your app: "how do I keep track of the state of all of my objects? When they change, how do I track the subsequent UI changes?"
Hope this helps
Hrm, I think you might be making this more complex than necessary. If you have the DOM part keeping track of what the user sees, and the JS object tracking it in code, why do you need a second JS object?
In fact, I would suggest trying to drop the JS object entirely, and keep track of everything in the dom, and only turn it into JS when you need. Unless there is a compelling reason (sometimes performance is the reason - manipulating the DOM is the biggest killer in JS).
Perhaps I am missing something in your use case...
Related
I have a view containing of many sub-views, which have relatively heavy CSS properties. and I need to add them(about 10-30 depending on screen-width) to browser every time user changes the sort or the category.
In android we handle this heavy task of adding many views, by using the ListView which basically does the heavy lifting once and then reuses the view later on.
I wanted to know if there is anyway in javascript to cache the view so appending them to the parent would be a lot faster.
in my performance tests, it takes about 500ms to just append the view to the parent DOM. but if there is a way to reuse a cached DOM to make things faster, it would be a lot better.
thanks in advance
I assume that in your case, one sub-view is needed at one time.
So, this library might inspire you http://nexts.github.io/Clusterize.js/
The idea is keep your whole data model in window object and render part of it (associated with sub-view) when user sort or category.
The ReactJS website states that,
When the data changes, React conceptually hits the "refresh" button, and knows to only update the changed parts.
What does this mean exactly?
How is this achieved?
How is this different from what AngularJS does?
Reactjs create a virtual DOM and does not touch to the real DOM. Then when some of DOM changed, it will use diff algorithm to find out what is different from previous state of DOM elements, finally just replace that changes. You can see this link for that algorithm to have more understanding. And you have to know what is shadow DOM as well.
Here's a great resource explaining why ReactJS was developed and how it differs from other frameworks like AngularJS:
http://www.quora.com/Pete-Hunt/Posts/Facebooks-React-vs-AngularJS-A-Closer-Look
"A lot of the heavyweight contenders for MVVM frameworks have a hard time rendering large amounts of data, like in lists and such. React doesn’t have that problem, as it renders only what’s changed.
For example, if a user is viewing a list of 100 items rendered with React, and he or she changes the third one down somehow, only that item gets rerendered, leaving the other 99 items unchanged."
(https://www.codementor.io/reactjs/tutorial/react-vs-angularjs)
So, I have some data that I get from a service in json.
I need to present it in a table, with various editable controls. It can then be edited and saved back.
I imagine two options:
Put the data into a javascript array, and edit them in the array, and update the dom. Then send the array when saving.
Keep everything purely in dom and then parse the dom, when I need to save.
But I'm starting to realize that I should probably think a little bit about performance as well. Is one method preferable over the other, when it comes to memory consumtion in the browser?
Are there options that are better than these?
The second option is much slower, as parsing the dom while getting the data is pretty slow. You should ideally update the dom from the array in javascript via bindings. Although it depends how big your table is, but using bindings is generally pretty fast and easy to code too. Only when the DOM nodes start to approach the size of a medium excel sheet (10000 rows, etc), then you'll have memory troubles and stuttering browsers, but till then it's the best way!
I'm starting to learn Backbone.js and can't figure out one thing: In a typical rails app, I have a layout view and a nested view. My layout usually contains navigation links that are processed by rails routing.
How do I do the same with Backbone? I'm using Rails 3.2 and eco templates.
Should I create nested templates in eco?
Should my navigation links be plain html links with a href or should the navigation be event driven?
For example I have a list of categories on the left, and a category items on the right. I want my categories to be shown on every view and the corresponding category items (with a URL in browser corresponding to selected category) too.
Please point me to right direction, because most tutorials on the Web are 'todo' style applications with no navigation at all.
Thank you.
UPDATE
Turns out, my question wasn't clear, so let me narrow it down.
How can the concept of RoR layouts be applied to backbone.js applications?
And I'm curious about two possible ways of navigation:
create
%a{:class => "customers", :href => "#customers"} Customers
handle ".customers click" event in my view
Which way is better?
And I'm curious about two possible ways of navigation:
create %a{:class => "customers", :href => "#customers"} Customers
handle ".customers click" event in my view
Which way is better?
neither is better until you know the specific context in which you are working. they are simply options for achieving your goal and desired functionality.
there are times when both should be used, as well. for example, if you are supporting search engine optimizations and accessibility.
Here are some better questions to ask:
Which of these will be the simplest thing that can get the job done? will it be more code to write the route handler, or the click handler?
Will the route handler tightly couple the functionality to a router, when I don't need that?
Do I really need a route for this link, so that people can bookmark it and come back to it directly?
Will a click handler cause my code to jump through several hoops of calling other objects that aren't directly related, or can I use a simple event to cause the other objects to run?
There isn't a single correct answer to any of these questions. I recommend trying many different ideas when you can. Keep in mind that you will likely change your answer as you develop new features. The answer that you want, today, won't be what you need tomorrow. But that shouldn't stop you from picking an answer now and moving on. Pick one, put it in place, and when you need to change it, change it.
I'm coming across a bit of an awkward problem. I have a Web page with quite a few buttons on it that need to be disabled and enabled at various points. Now if this were a Swing (or any otehr desktop UI interface for that matter), it would be quite trivial: I would simply add listeners for the model changes I was interested in and update the UI accordingly.
This is basic MVC stuff really.
Thing is, I'm at a bit of a loss as to how to handle this nicely in Javascript. I'm going down a route that will end up with some real spaghetti code where the click listeners for the buttons are updating the UI controls and that's just not going to end well.
EDIT: Let me give you a more concreate example.
Example
Imagine a screen that lists open orders. Those orders are presented in a table as each row (order) has multiple attributes against it, such as who is currently managing the order, who made the order, what it's for, when the order was made and the status of the order.
I've done it so you can select one (or more) of these orders by clicking on the rows. This adds a "selected" class, which changes the styling, much like a list.
As to the behaviour, if a user selects one order then certain actions become available, such as Open Order (to view the details), Take Owneship, Cancel and so on. The attributes of the order may also affect what actions are available eg if the order is "owned" by somebody else already, certain actions will be disabled.
Some of these options (like opening the order) aren't available if you've selected multiple orders.
Additionally via a background Ajax call the list refreshes with new orders periodically. The user can also click refresh or can filter the orders (by name, date range and so on) and then reload the orders. While the orders are reloading certain buttons get disabled.
I was going to do a second example but I think that one is sufficiently complex to illustrate the kind of problem. Now I've started this by giving various controls classes. For example, elements with the "select" class might be disabled/enabled/styled when an item is selected.
Now this works reasonably well in simple cases but I'm running into problems where the state of a control depends on multiple conditions. Also the classes are getting fractured by things like some elements want to be styled, some controls want to be disabled/enabled and in some cases both things need to happen.
In Swing I tended to handdle this kind of thing by having a sort of updateUI() method, which would be called whenever the state of a relevant control or model was changed. It would then set the state of all the controls explicitly. Now this is arguably not the most efficient way (eg if you have 30 controls and only need to update one of them it's a bit of a waste) but I found the simplicity was worth it. The alternative was that controls/models ended up with too information about what controls they depended on or those that depended on them. It go tmessy from a coupling point of view.
But I have no such (obvious) mechanism in Javascript. Inobtrusive Javascript as advocated by jQuery is great because it stops random code snippets being littered throughout your code. But I need to go a step further nad have some way of managing the complexity of this (because it is quite a complex screen and will only get more complex).
If you want to preserve your sanity, use a state machine.
You don't really give details about what your UI does, so I'll make up an example. Let's say you have a file upload page. The user should be able to select a file, click an upload button, and then be returned to the page they came from, when uploading is complete. So you could have three states, "SelectFile", "Uploading", "Finished". In the "SelectFile" state, controls should be enabled to allow the user to select a file. In the "Uploading" state, these control should be disabled, and the user should see a progress indicator. In the "Finished" state, the user should be redirected.
Of course, it sounds like your case is more complicated, but the same ideas will apply. You may need more than one state machine, if portions of user interface interact. That's fine.
When you want to change the enabled/disabled elements on the user interface, you just change the state of the state machine. The state machine itself tells the various user interface controls to update themselves based on the current state. You can use a Bharani's (good, up voted) suggestion of using classes to do this. Or whatever mechanism works for you.
The nice thing is that the controls no longer interact with each other. They only interact with the state machine. So you get rid of all the cases where states bounce around incorrectly or endlessly recurse.
Assign specific class names to the divs. That way even if they overlap in functionality you can simply keep adding class names to the div and because of the chain nature of jquery all registered event handlers will be executed.
For controlling form elements during ajax call - you can add ajaxStart and ajaxEnd or you can use ajaxComplete and handle all your code inside the callbacks.
I think i get your problem. I have worked on such screens before and i always ended up refactoring to structure the code better. But at times it will be easier if you could re-organize the functionality itself so that you don't have to handle all things in one place. I think GUI should also be treated like a function - do one thing and one thing well.
I think data modeling is important for JavaScript apps. I am working on this scheduling project for medical clinics and I have a JSON data structure that models chairs/patients in an office. Ember updates the views (UI widgets) automatically when the business logic changes in the models. So right off the bat a lot of sphagetti code is eliminated. If you are doing something graphically intense with user interaction it is almost a crime not to use an existing MVC pattern or to create your own MVC JS classes. The structured discipline is off putting at first but when you see later how it lowers your blood pressure and makes maintenance so much more enjoyable it is worth it. I wouldn't use it for simple one-off projects if they are small. It is better for medium complexity or advanced complexity. Anything that will take me more than a week I will use Ember. I have used knockout.js and Angular and I really like Ember with its Handlebars templating syntax. Easy on the eyes and efficient.