This is a combination of classic ASP and Javascript, we are trying to insert a single quote around each itemno but it is not working.
It is ending up looking like this: 10234,12343, instead of '10234','12343',
(The trailing comma I strip later)...
What can be done differently to keep the ItemNo's single quoted?
var Prefix_JS_Item = [<%For intA = 1 to intCount%><%="'" & trim(Mid(cartobj(intA).Item("ItemNo"),4)) & "',"%><%Next%>];
document.write(Prefix_JS_Item);
There have been two attempts so far but try this:-
var Prefix_JS_Item = [<%For intA = 1 to intCount%><%="""'" & trim(Mid(cartobj(intA).Item("ItemNo"),4)) & "'"","%><%Next%>];
document.write(Prefix_JS_Item);
Javascript supports both " and ' to enclose a string literal. So to include a ' in a literal you can use " to enclose the literal. Now in VB to include a " in string literal you double them to "".
BTW, don't "quote" me (sorry) but in javascript I think you can get away with the trailing comma.
The script is doing what you want. The way you verify is what is wrong.
After ASP executes you will have '10234','12343' inside the JavaScript. To see it go to "view source code" (CTRL + U) in your browser.
Then you write it to the document. To JavaScript '10234' the quotes are delimiters for a string. Therefore it will only write what is inside them.
If you still want to have quotes even when writing it to the document then:
... <%="""'" & trim(Mid(cartobj(intA).Item("ItemNo"),4)) & """," %>
document.write(Prefix_JS_Item);
Which in javascript will look like: "'10234'","'12343'"
EDIT: To scape quotes in ASP you use another quote.
you have to escape the single quote
...<%="\'" & trim(Mid(cartobj(intA).Item("ItemNo"),4)) & "\',"%><%Next%>];
Related
Here is a section of code used by CKEditor on my website:
CKEDITOR.config.IPS_BBCODE = {"acronym":{"id":"8","title":"Acronym","desc":"Allows you to make an acronym that will display a description when moused over","tag":"acronym","useoption":"1","example":"[acronym='Laugh Out Loud']lol[/acronym]", ...
If you scroll to the right just a little, you will see this:
"[acronym='Laugh Out Loud']lol[/acronym]"
I need to store all of the CKEditor code inside a javascript string, but I can't figure out how to do it because the string has both " and ' in it. See the problem? Furthermore, I don't think I can just escape the quotes because I tried doing that and the editor didn't work.
Any idea what I can do?
You might try taking the string and injecting JavaScript escape codes into it. JavaScript can essentially use any unicode value when using the format: \u#### - so, for a ' character, the code is \u0039, and for the " character, the code is \u0034.
So - you could encode your example portion of the string as:
\u0034[acronym=\u0039Laugh Out Loud\u0039]lol[/acronym]\u0034
Alternatively, you could attempt to simply escape the quotes as in:
\"[acronym=\'Laugh Out Loud\']lol[/acronym]\"
The problem here occurs when you wind up with this kind of situation:
"data:{'prop1':'back\\slash'}"
Which, when escaped in this manner, becomes:
"data:{\'prop\':\'back\\\\slash\'}\"
While this is somewhat more readable than the first version - de-serializing it can be a little tricky when going across object-spaces, such as a javascript object being passed to a C# parser which needs to deserialize into objects, then re-serialize and come back down. Both languages use \ as their escape character, and it is possible to get funky scenarios which are brain-teasers to solve.
The advantage of the \u#### method is that only JavaScript generally uses it in a typical stack - so it is pretty easy to understand what part should be unescaped by what application piece.
hmm.. you said you already tried to escape the quotes and it gave problems.
This shouldn't give problems at all, so try this:
$newstring = addslashes($oldstring);
There's no need to use Unicode escape sequences. Just surround your string with double quotes, and put a backslash before any double quotes within the string.
var x = "\"[acronym='Laugh Out Loud']lol[/acronym]\"";
I have a JS file with some XML in it, where the XML is supposed to get converted to a word by the server.
E.g.
var ip = "<lang:cond><lang:when test="$(VAR{'ip_addr'})">$(VAR{'ip_addr'})</lang:when></lang:cond>";
This gets converted to:
var ip = "192.168.0.0";
However, in case the server doesn't work as intended, I don't want there to be a syntax error, and this is VERY important. Currently there would be a syntax error because the language uses both types of quotes. I can't think of a way to get around this, but perhaps there's another way to do quotes in JavaScript? Or to create a string?
For example, in Python I'd use triple quotes:
ip = """<lang:cond><lang:when test="$(VAR{'ip_addr'})">$(VAR{'ip_addr'})</lang:when></lang:cond>"""
Anyone have a bright idea?
I have had to create strings without quotes for a project as well. We were delivering executable client javascript to the browser for an internal website. The receiving end strips double and single quotes when displayed. One way I have found to get around quotes is by declaring my string as a regular expression.
var x = String(/This contains no quotes/);
x = x.substring(1, x.length-1);
x;
Using String prototype:
String(/This contains no quotes/).substring(1).slice(0,-1)
Using String.fromCharCode
String.fromCharCode(72,69,76,76,79)
Generate Char Codes for this:
var s = "This contains no quotes";
var result = [];
for (i=0; i<s.length; i++)
{
result.push(s.charCodeAt(i));
}
result
In JavaScript, you can escape either type of quote with a \.
For example:
var str = "This is a string with \"embedded\" quotes.";
var str2 = 'This is a string with \'embedded\' quotes.';
In particular, your block of JavaScript code should be converted to:
var ip = "<lang:cond><lang:when test=\"$(VAR{'ip_addr'})\">$(VAR{'ip_addr'})</lang:when></lang:cond>";
In general, I always prefer to escape the quotes instead of having to constantly switch quote types, depending upon what type of quotes may be used within.
I was looking for a solution to the same problem. Someone suggested looking at https://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/template_strings which proved helpful. After reading about half the article, it stated that you can create strings with the backward tick character. (`)
Try this :)
document.getElementById('test').innerHTML = `'|'|'|"|"`
<div id="test" style="font-size:3em;"></div>
You can't create a string without using a single or double quote, as even calling the String() prototype object directly still requires you to pass it the string.
Inside XML you would use CDATA, but inside JS you'll have to just escape the '\"strings\"' "\'appropriately\'"
I have a form where users can enter any HTML.
var title = "Cool Check This"
As you can see, the variable is having " but it can be also '. It causes an error if there is ". What is better way to fix this? Storing escaped string in database like below?
$title = str_replace('"', "'", $_REQUEST['title']); // Replace double quote with single quote as js variable above is wrapped with double quotes.
Or escape it before showing on page? Anything in jQuery like escape that can help here?
var title="Cool Check This"
Well, you cannot escape it using JavaScript because JavaScript needs to see what you want to escape and you want to escape that. If you use PHP, you can use addslashes() prior to inserting into JavaScript.
Anyways, you should be careful of allowing to insert any HTML. Wrongly escaped HTML (like allowing to insert <script>) can allow to do various dangerous stuff, like stealing all cookies.
<button onClick="function("parameter")">Click</button>
<button onClick="function('parameter')">Click</button>
var variable = "value";
var variable = 'value';
Is there a difference?
No. They are interchangeable by design.
The only requirement is that you need matching pairs (either use " or ', but not both to signify a string).
See the spec for string literals:
StringLiteral:
" StringCharactersDQopt "
' StringCharactersSQopt '
When used within HTML, you need to be careful not to use the same delimiter in HTML attributes as the javascript ones (which is why your first example is not legal).
To function correctly you would need to change it to:
<button onClick='function("parameter")'>Click</button>
Yes, there's a difference when you mix it with HTML like you do: the first snippet will throw an exception because you need to escape the double quotes while the second will work (that's one of the reasons why you should avoid mixing markup with javascript). In pure javascript (a separate file) there's no difference.
The two are equivalent as long as the same one is used at both the beginning and end of the string literal. That said, choosing the correct one can avoid needless string escaping:
<button onClick="function("parameter")">Click</button> <!-- becomes -->
<button onClick="function('parameter')">Click</button>
var foo = "And the computer said: \"Hello, world!\""; // becomes
var foo = 'And the computer said: "Hello, world!"';
This has a clear advantage when using JavaScript to generate HTML, as is common in scripts using jQuery.
There is no difference. ' and " are interchangeable. Now you can't have a string like this: var my_var = 'hello world"; Opening and close quotes have to match. This does allow you to easily do: var my_variable = 'John says "I love JavaScript."' without having to escaping anything.
so this: <button onClick="function("parameter")">Click</button> won't work because you have opened and closed the onclick event prematurely "function("
It is the same. The only reason for having ' and " is, that you cannot nest them, for example, in given onClick example ->
onClick=" and there you need to use ' to encapsulate string "
The only time that there is a difference (that I am aware of) is in JSON: Double quotes are required around the keys and values.
And yes, everyone is right; Your first line should read like this or it will throw an error:
<button onClick='function("parameter")'>Click</button>
I prefer to use the double quotes only (if possible) because I'm used to C like languages (C, C++, C#) where string can be wrapped only with double quotes. (Single quotes is used, but to wrap char type)
To answer the question itself: same like all others said, no real difference - guess it exists to support cases when you mix JavaScript with HTML.
I am having problems when trying to use a rails variable within javascript code.
For example, I might define a link_to_remote, with parameter
:complete => "alert('my_var');"
If my_var = "I'm testing.", then the javascript code will break due to the single quote closing the code prematurely. If I try using escape_javascript(my_var) so that the quote gets turned into \', it doesn't seem to fix the problem.
I've noticed that when you try alert('I\'m testing'); there's a problem, but if you do alert('I\\'m testing'), it works. Since escape_javascript only turns ' into \', rather than \\', does somebody have a suggestion for how to handle this?
Thanks!
Eric
when you try alert('I\'m testing'); there's a problem
Backslash is also an escape in Ruby strings! So the string literal:
"alert('I\'m testing');"
means the string:
alert('I'm testing');
the backslash is gone already before JavaScript gets a look at it. When you are writing a JavaScript string literal inside a Ruby string literal you need to escape the escape, \\, to get a real \ that will then, in JavaScript, escape the apostrophe.
escape_javascript correctly generates the backslash for JavaScript, if a backslash was included in its input. But again, if you're writing a string literal, you have to escape the backslash to get a real backslash:
escape_javascript("\b") -> this is a backspace character!
escape_javascript("\\b") -> this is backslash-then-letter-b;
escaped for JavaScript literal to double-backslash-then-b.
So, this is fine:
"'"+escape_javascript(myvar)+"'"
alternatively, you can use a JSON encoder to create the JavaScript string literal including the surrounding quotes.