I have a JSON array(?) of pairs of every state and a value associated with that state, it looks like the following below:
var states = [{"STATE":"AL","AMOUNT":"6"}, {"STATE":"AK","AMOUNT":"3"}]
I need the page to shuffle through them without reloading the page
"AL 6" [wait x seconds] then "AK 3" [wait x seconds] then etc...
I need this to run continuously.
I never use any of these languages but was told that they were my best bet.
Could someone give me some guidance on this please.
Thank you in advance.
Here's a jsfiddle with setInterval execting a function that alternates between each state and displays it in a div:
http://jsfiddle.net/WD5Qj/1/
var states = '[{"STATE":"AL","AMOUNT":"6"}, {"STATE":"AK","AMOUNT":"3"}]';
json = jQuery.parseJSON(states);
var i = 0;
var cycle = function(){
$("#state").html(json[i].STATE + json[i].AMOUNT);
i = (i+1)%json.length;
}
var loop = setInterval(cycle, 500);
Alright, you'd need a function that does the rotation through the array, and a variable for keeping the current state (in both meanings of the word):
var stateIndex = 0;
function rotate() {
stateIndex++;
if(stateIndex >= states.length)
stateIndex = 0;
displayState(states[stateIndex]);
}
And you'd need an interval to perform the rotation:
var stateRotation = window.setInterval(rotate, 3000); // 3000ms = 3 sec
The stateRotation variable is an identifier of your interval. You may use that if you ever want to stop: window.clearInterval(stateRotation);
Now, the above code anticipates a function displayState which takes a state object and displays it. How that would look depends entirely on how you want your state to displayed. In its simplest form, something like this:
function displayState(state) {
$('#state-name').html(state.STATE);
$('#state-amount').html(state.AMOUNT);
}
As per your description, it might perhaps be something more like
$('#state-text').html(state.STATE + ' ' + state.AMOUNT);
var states = [{"STATE":"AL","AMOUNT":"6"}, {"STATE":"AK","AMOUNT":"3"}];
var i = 0;
setInterval(function(){
var array_index = i % states.length;
$('#state').html( states[ array_index ]['STATE'] );
$('#state').html( states[ array_index ]['AMOUNT'] );
i++;
}, 2000);
Here's a fiddle.
function displayNextItem(index){
if (index === states.length)
displayNextItem(0);
$("#someDiv").text(states[index]["STATE"] + " " + states[index]["AMOUNT"]);
setTimeout(function() { displayNextItem(index + 1); }, 1000);
}
And then
displayNextItem(0);
var i = 0, l = states.length, timer, intervalLength = 5000;
timer = setInterval(function(){
if(i >= l){
clearInterval(timer);
}else{
alert(states[i++].STATE);
}
},intervalLength);
This implementation is waiting the AMOUNT number of seconds. If you want constant number of seconds then other answers are better :).
JavaScript:
var states = [{"STATE":"AL","AMOUNT":"6"}, {"STATE":"AK","AMOUNT":"3"}];
function iterate(index) {
var time = states[index].AMOUNT;
// replace the text with new one
$("#output").text(states[index].STATE + " " + time);
setTimeout(function() {
var next = (index + 1) % states.length;
iterate(next);
}, time * 1000);
}
iterate(0);
HERE is the code.
Related
I am trying to get a WebWorker to count to 100 and update a div with the value of I, currently the div just updates straight to 100 and seems to ignore the interval....
JavaScript (webworker file):
self.addEventListener('message', function (e) {
switch (e.data) {
case 'Hi Worker':
postMessage('Hi Boss');
break
case 'Count to 100':
var i;
for (i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
setInterval(postMessage(i + 1), 1000);
}
break;
default:
self.postMessage("Not sure how to help with that");
}
}, false);
Main file:
<script>
var worker = new Worker('worker.js');
worker.addEventListener('message', function (e) {
console.log("worker said: " + "'" + e.data + "'");
document.getElementById("workerComms").textContent = "worker said: " + e.data;
}, false);
</script>
</head>
<body>
<button onclick="worker.postMessage('Hi Worker');return false;">Say 'Hi Worker'</button>
<button onclick="worker.postMessage('Count to 100');return false;">Count to 100</button>
<div id="workerComms">Things workers say...</div>
setInterval(postMessage(i + 1), 1000); calls postMessage(i + 1) and then passes the return value into setInterval, exactly the way foo(bar()) calls bar and passes the return value into foo.
Instead:
You want to pass a function reference to setInterval
You want to use setTimeout, not setInterval
You want to vary the timeout, because otherwise they'll all happen stacked on top of each other one second later
Something like:
for (i = 1; i <= 100; i++) {
setTimeout(postMessage.bind(window, i), 1000 * i);
}
would probably do it. That schedules 100 timers, at one-second intervals. It uses postMessage.bind(window, i) to create a function that, when called, will all postMessage with this set to window and passing in i as the first argument. I did i from 1 to 100 rather than 0 to 99 to avoid having to add 1 to it in both places I used it.
Alternately, you could ditch the for loop entirely and use setInterval or a chained series of setTimeout. Here's the setInterval:
var i = 0;
var timer = setInterval(function() {
postMessage(++i);
if (i >= 100) {
clearInterval(timer);
}
}, 1000);
I have a JSON file which stores an array of picture URLs. I want to rotate through these links, changing the background of a div every 4 seconds.
I'm having no trouble accessing the JSON file or changing the background of the div. However, I can't seem to figure out how to restart at the beginning of the array after every picture has been shown.
How should I approach this problem?
$.getJSON(json, function (data) {
var arr = $.map(data, function (el) { return el; })
, i = 0;
var changeObj = function() {
i++;
var url = 'url("' + arr[i].url + '")';
$this.css({
backgroundImage: url
});
};
setInterval(changeObj, 4000);
});
Here's a demo
Let's assume your have already parsed your JSON into an array of URLs called myPictureArray and you have written a function called swapInNewPicture, which takes a URL of an image as its argument. (I'm not going to write these functions for you.)
var rotatePictures = function (arr) {
var length = arr.length
, i = 0;
setInterval(function () {
i = (i + 1) % length;
swapInNewPicture(arr[i]);
}, 4000)
}
Now, all you have to do is call rotatePictures(myPictureArray) after you finish parsing your JSON.
Use the modulus operation so it wraps around when it reaches the end of the array. Replace:
i++;
with:
i = (i + 1) % arr.length;
This is basically equivalent to:
i++;
if (i == arr.length) {
i = 0;
}
BTW, you can simplify the setInterval call to:
setInterval(changeObj, 4000);
okay so i want if my counter reaches the maximum count, it starts over, with the default counter number which is 0 here is my code:
var picCount = 0; // global
var maxCount = 4;
//Pictures, to add more then 4 pics, add var picFive = "link to image here", var picSix ="bla", you get it.. add in picArray ,picFive and ,picSix
//To change the time delay, change it at the body onload and on the setTimeout
var picOne = "http://screenshots.nl.sftcdn.net/nl/scrn/3342000/3342167/modloader-for-minecraft-02-700x406.jpg"
var picTwo = "http://media.moddb.com/images/downloads/1/31/30912/minecraft_blox.png"
var picThree = "http://www.mupload.nl/img/rl6zeofbb.png"
var picFour = "http://www.mupload.nl/img/rl6zeofbb.png"
var picArray = [picOne, picTwo, picThree, picFour]
//
// gets next picture in array
function nextPic() { // check if adding 1 exceeds number of pics in array
if (picCount.length < maxCount.length) {
picCount = (picCount + 1 < picArray.length) ? picCount + 1 : 5000;
// build the image to write to page using the new pic reference
var build = '<img border="0" src="' + picArray[picCount] + '" width="649">\n';
document.getElementById("imgHolder").innerHTML = build;
// repeat this every 10 seconds.
setTimeout('nextPic()', 10 * 1000) //setTimeout is here
} else {
picCount = (picCount - maxCount < picArray.length) ? picCount + 1 : 5000;
// build the image to write to page using the new pic reference
var build = '<img border="0" src="' + picArray[picCount] + '" width="649">\n';
document.getElementById("imgHolder").innerHTML = build;
// repeat this every 10 seconds.
setTimeout('nextPic()', 10 * 1000) //setTimeout is here
}
}
okay so i hope you guys can help me with this..
That's a lot of messy code.
My fix for an implementation would probably look something like this:
var currentPic = 0;
var picOne = "http://screenshots.nl.sftcdn.net/nl/scrn/3342000/3342167/modloader-for-minecraft-02-700x406.jpg"
var picTwo = "http://media.moddb.com/images/downloads/1/31/30912/minecraft_blox.png"
var picThree = "http://www.mupload.nl/img/rl6zeofbb.png"
var picFour = "http://www.mupload.nl/img/rl6zeofbb.png"
var picArray= [picOne,picTwo,picThree,picFour]
function nextPic() {
if (currentPic < picArray.length) {currentPic++;}
else {currentPic = 0;}
var build='<img border="0" src="'+picArray[currentPic]+'" width="649">';
document.getElementById("imgHolder").innerHTML=build;
// repeat this every 10 seconds.
setTimeout('nextPic()',10 * 1000)//setTimeout is here
}
Despite many other issues which I am sure are present in your code, I believe this line is the cause of your particular problem addressed in the question:
if (picCount.length < maxCount.length) {
maxCount and picCount are just numbers. They do not have a length property. Change it to this:
if (picCount < maxCount) {
var currentPic = 0;
var picArray= ["http://screenshots.nl.sftcdn.net/nl/scrn/3342000/3342167/modloader-for-minecraft-02-700x406.jpg",
"http://media.moddb.com/images/downloads/1/31/30912/minecraft_blox.png",
"http://www.mupload.nl/img/rl6zeofbb.png",
"http://www.mupload.nl/img/rl6zeofbb.png"];
function nextPic() {
(currentPic < picArray.length) ? currentPic++ : currentPic = 0;
var build='<img border="0" src="'+picArray[currentPic]+'" width="649">';
document.getElementById("imgHolder").innerHTML=build;
}
setTimeout('nextPic()',10 * 1000);
I made a few changes that make your code cleaner.
Some tips:
No need to store your image URLs in vars before putting them in the array. Just initialize your array with them.
Don't repeat yourself. Whenever you find yourself using the exact same code in multiple places, you probably need to rethink how you are approaching the problem.
Look up the "ternary operator". In my opinion it makes simple conditional statements easier to read.
No need to use maxCount - the max count will be the length of your picArray.
Although not usually required, try to end all statements with a semicolon.
Don't mind the elitist attitude some people have, but at the same time, try to research as much as you can before asking a question.
Trying to make a simple count up timer in jQuery... this sort of works but is adding the numbers to the end of '0000' and I want it to go '0001' '0002' '0003' etc...
This is all happening in the jQuery onReady scope.
var i = '0000'
var timer = function doSomething ( )
{
i = i+= 1
$('.counter').text(i);
console.log(i);
}
setInterval (timer, 1000 );
Your "i" variable needs to be an integer. You can format it how you like when you want to print it somewhere.
$(document).ready(function() {
var i = 0;
var target = $('.counter');
var timer = function doSomething ( )
{
i++;
var output = pad(i,4);
target.text(output);
console.log(output);
}
setInterval (timer, 1000 );
});
function pad(number, length) {
var str = '' + number;
while (str.length < length) {
str = '0' + str;
}
return str;
}
Your current code is appending to a string, not addition to a number. It essentially looks like
i = '0000' + 1, i = '00001' + 1, i = '000011' + 1 ...
and so on. You'll need to keep it integer based to continue adding to the number. Here's an example with the formatting it looks like you wanted.
var pad = function(n) { return (''+n).length<4?pad('0'+n):n; };
jQuery.fn.timer = function() {
var t = this, i = 0;
setInterval(function() {
t.text(pad(i++));
}, 1000);
};
$('#timer').timer();
http://jsfiddle.net/jDaTK/
I would do something more like this:
// Make sure Date.now exists in your environment
Date.now = Date.now || function () { return Number(new Date()); };
var time = 0,
start = Date.now(),
intervalId;
intervalId = setInterval(function () {
var seconds, display;
// get the exact time since the timer was started
time = Date.now() - start;
// get the number or seconds, rounded down
seconds = Math.floor(time / 1000);
display = '' + seconds;
// pad the beginning of your display string with zeros
while (display.length < 4) {
display = "0" + display;
}
console.log(display);
}, 100);
setInterval is not exact. This code ensures that while the display could be up to nearly a second off (in theory), the actual time you are tracking is always the exact amount of time that has elapsed since you started the timer. But this code would update the display about once every tenth of a second, so it's not likely to ever be off more than a few milliseconds.
From here you can figure out smarter ways to update the display to ensure you have the level of accuracy you need. If this needs to be pretty accurate, then you could make sure you are displaying to the tenth of the second.
I really recommend the jQuery CountUp plugin. I tried a number of Javascript counters and this was one of the easiest to implement and came with lots of goodies:
<script type="text/javascript">
$(document).ready(function(){
$('#counter').countUp({
'lang':'en', 'format':'full', 'sinceDate': '22/07/2008-00::00';
});
});
</script>
<div id="counter"></div>
This is my code. What I want it to do is write 0, wait one sec, write 1, wait one sec, write 2, wait one sec, etc. Instead it writes 5 5 5 5 5
for(i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
setTimeout("document.write(i + ' ')", 1000);
}
http://jsfiddle.net/Xb7Eb/
1) You set all the timeouts to last 1 second at the same time. The loop doesn't wait for the timeout to occur. So you have 5 timeouts that all execute at the same time.
2) When the timeouts execute, the loop is long since complete and i has become 5. So once they execute, they all print "5"
3) document.write() writes somthing onto the page, in the same place it executes. I.e. if you have <script>document.write("xyz")</script> in the middle of a piece of text, it'll write "xyz" in the middle of the text. The timeouts, however, are not necessarily anywhere on the page. They exist only in code.
Here's a solution that's as close to yours as possible: http://jsfiddle.net/rvbtU/1/
var container = document.getElementById("counter");
for(i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
setTimeout("container.innerHTML += '" + i + " ';", 1000 * i);
}
However, that solution uses setTimeout's ability to evaluate a string as javascript, which is never a good idea.
Here's a solution that uses an anymous function instead: http://jsfiddle.net/YbPVX/1/
var container = document.getElementById("counter");
var writer = function(number) {
return function() { container.innerHTML += String(number) + " "; };
}
for(i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
setTimeout(writer(i), 1000 * i);
}
Edit: Forgot to save the 2nd fiddle. Whoops. Fixed now.
Most of the answers available are giving bad advice.* Specifically, you shouldn't be passing a string to setTimeout anymore (it still works, but it's discouraged), it's no longer 2000, there are better ways to do this.
setTimeout takes a function as the first parameter, and that's what you should do, however there are some issues when calling setTimeout in a loop.
This looks like it should work:
var i;
for ( i = 0; i < 5; i++ )
{
setTimeout(function(){
document.write( i + ' ' );
}, 1000 * (i + 1) );
}
But it doesn't. The issue is that by the time setTimeout executes the function, the loop will have incremented i to 5, so you'll get the same value repeated.
There are a few fixes. If you're willing to risk a with statement, you could try the following:
var i;
for ( i = 0; i < 5; i++ )
{
with( { i:i } )
{
setTimeout(function(){
document.write( i + ' ' );
}, 1000 * (i+1) );
}
}
Note that with is typically discouraged just like passing string values to setTimeout, so I don't really suggest this method of doing things.
The better way is to use a closure:
var i;
for ( i = 0; i < 5; i++ )
{
(function(i){
setTimeout(function(){
document.write( i + ' ' );
}, 1000 * (i+1) );
})(i);
}
To explain what's going on, the anonymous function wrapper (function(i){...code...}) executes immediately because it's wrapped in parens and passed i as a value:
(function(i){...code...})(i);
This forces the i variable that document.write uses to be a different one than what's being used in the for loop. You could even change the parameter used in the anonymous function wrapper if the difference gets too confusing:
(function(a){document.write(a+' ')})(i);
* when I started writing this question there were a number of answers describing how to fix the string to work with setTimeout, although they would technically work, they didn't include why they would work (because 'document.write("' + i + ' ");' evaluates i at the time of calling due to string concatenation, versus evaluating i at runtime like the previous version did), and they most certainly didn't mention that it's the bad old way of calling setTimeout.
try
var i = 1;
function timeout(){
document.write(i + ' ');
i++;
if (i == 5) return;
setTimeout(timeout, 1000);
}
timeout();
http://jsfiddle.net/nnJcG/1/
You have a problem with clousures, you can try this:
var timeout = function(){
var i = 0;
return function(){
document.write(i+ ' ');
i++;
if(i!==5)
setTimeout(timeout,1000);
};
}();
setTimeout(timeout,1000);
Here is the example in jsBin http://jsbin.com/uloyuc/edit
First of all, NEVER pass a string to setTimeout. Use a function, it's much cleaner.
Second, you have to "close over" the loop value. I bet this is what you want.
for(var i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
(function(i) {
setTimeout(function() {
document.write(i + ' ')
}, i * 1000);
}(i));
}
See more about you a self executing function to close over a loop value here http://www.mennovanslooten.nl/blog/post/62
And just cause I love it, here is the equivalent in CoffeeScript whihc has the do keyword to help out with just this case.
for i in [0..4]
do (i) ->
setTimeout ->
document.write "#{ i } "
, i * 1000
You can also work with setInterval and clearInterval:
var i = 0;
var f = setInterval(function() {
if(i == 4) clearInterval(f);
document.write(++i + ' ');
}, 1000);
I think this code is very readable.
You could try like this:
var tick_limit = 5; // Or any number you wish representing the number of ticks
var counter = 0; // Or any number you wish
var timer_interval = 1000; // Interval for the counter
var timer;
function timerTick()
{
if(counter < tick_limit)
{
// Execute code and increase current count
document.body.innerHTML+=(counter + ' '); // Append the counter value to the body of the HTML page
counter++;
timer = setTimeout(timerTick,timer_interval);
}
else
{
// Reset everything
clearTimeout(timer);
counter = 0;
}
}
function startCounter()
{
clearTimeout(timer); // Stop current timer
timer = setTimeout(timerTick,timer_interval); // Start timer with any interval you wish
}
...
// Start timer when required
startCounter();
...
This way, calling the startCounter a number of times will result in a single timer executing the code
You're triggering five timeouts at the same time.
I like Pindatjuh's answer, but here's another fun way to do it.
This way starts the next timeout when the previous one is finished:
// Wrap everything in a self executing anonymous function so we don't pollute
// the global namespace.
//
// Note: Always use "var" statments or you will pollute the global namespace!
// For example "for(i = 0; i < 5; i++)" will pollute the global namespace
// unless you have "var i; for(i = 0; i < 5; i++)" or
// "for(var i = 0; i < 5; i++)" & all of that is not in the global namespace.
//
(function() {
// "i" will be available within doThis()
// you could also pass "i" as an argument
var i = 0,
doThis = function() {
// setTimeout can take an anonymous function
// or a regular function. This is better than
// eval-ing a string.
setTimeout(function() {
document.write(i + ' ');
++i;
// Do the function again if necessary
if (i < 5) doThis();
}, 1000);
}
// Let's begin!
doThis();
})();
Working Example