We Keep Coding

Optimize HTML5 drawImage Video on Canvas [duplicate]

I have 2 canvases, one uses HTML attributes width and height to size it, the other uses CSS:
<canvas id="compteur1" width="300" height="300" onmousedown="compteurClick(this.id);"></canvas>
<canvas id="compteur2" style="width: 300px; height: 300px;" onmousedown="compteurClick(this.id);"></canvas>
Compteur1 displays like it should, but not compteur2. The content is drawn using JavaScript on a 300x300 canvas.
Why is there a display difference?

It seems that the width and height attributes determine the width or height of the canvas’s coordinate system, whereas the CSS properties just determine the size of the box in which it will be shown.
This is explained in the HTML specification:
The canvas element has two attributes to control the size of the element’s bitmap: width and height. These attributes, when specified, must have values that are valid non-negative integers. The rules for parsing non-negative integers must be used to obtain their numeric values. If an attribute is missing, or if parsing its value returns an error, then the default value must be used instead. The width attribute defaults to 300, and the height attribute defaults to 150.

To set the width and height on a canvas, you may use:
canvasObject.setAttribute('width', '150');
canvasObject.setAttribute('height', '300');

For <canvas> elements, the CSS rules for width and height set the actual size of the canvas element that will be drawn to the page. On the other hand, the HTML attributes of width and height set the size of the coordinate system or 'grid' that the canvas API will use.
For example, consider this (jsfiddle):
var ctx = document.getElementById('canvas1').getContext('2d');
ctx.fillStyle = "red";
ctx.fillRect(10, 10, 30, 30);
var ctx2 = document.getElementById('canvas2').getContext('2d');
ctx2.fillStyle = "red";
ctx2.fillRect(10, 10, 30, 30);
canvas {
border: 1px solid black;
}
<canvas id="canvas1" style="width: 50px; height: 100px;" height="50" width="100"></canvas>
<canvas id="canvas2" style="width: 100px; height: 100px;" height="50" width="100"></canvas>
Both have had the same thing drawn on them relative to the internal coordinates of the canvas element. But in the second canvas, the red rectangle will be twice as wide because the canvas as a whole is being stretched across a bigger area by the CSS rules.
Note: If the CSS rules for width and/or height aren't specified then the browser will use the HTML attributes to size the element such that 1 unit of these values equals 1px on the page. If these attributes aren't specified then they will default to a width of 300 and a height of 150.

The canvas will be stretched if you set the width and height in your CSS. If you want to dynamically manipulate the dimension of the canvas you have to use JavaScript like so:
canvas = document.getElementById('canv');
canvas.setAttribute('width', '438');
canvas.setAttribute('height', '462');

The browser uses the css width and height, but the canvas element scales based on the canvas width and height. In javascript, read the css width and height and set the canvas width and height to that.
var myCanvas = $('#TheMainCanvas');
myCanvas[0].width = myCanvas.width();
myCanvas[0].height = myCanvas.height();

Shannimal correction
var el = $('#mycanvas');
el.attr('width', parseInt(el.css('width')))
el.attr('height', parseInt(el.css('height')))

Canvas renders image by buffer, so when you specify the width and height HTML attributes the buffer size and length changes, but when you use CSS, the buffer's size is unchanged. Making the image stretched.
Using HTML sizing.
Size of canvas is changed -> buffer size is changed -> rendered
Using CSS sizing
Size of canvas is changed -> rendered
Since the buffer length is kept unchanged, when the context renders the image,
the image is displayed in resized canvas (but rendered in unchanged buffer).

CSS sets the width and height of the canvas element so it affects the coordinate space leaving everything drawn skewed
Here's my way on how to set the width and height with Vanilla JavaScript
canvas.width = numberForWidth
canvas.height = numberForHeight

I believe CSS has much better machinery for specifying the size of the canvas and CSS must decide styling, not JavaScript or HTML. Having said that, setting width and height in HTML is important for working around the issue with canvas.
CSS has !important rule that allows to override other styling rules for the property, including those in HTML. Usually, its usage is frowned upon but here the use is a legitimate hack.
In Rust module for WebAssembly you can do the following:
fn update_buffer(canvas: &HtmlCanvasElement) {
canvas.set_width(canvas.client_width() as u32);
canvas.set_height(canvas.client_height() as u32);
}
//..
#[wasm_bindgen(start)]
pub fn start() -> Result<(), JsValue> {
// ...
let canvas: Rc<_> = document
.query_selector("canvas")
.unwrap()
.unwrap()
.dyn_into::<HtmlCanvasElement>()
.unwrap()
.into();
update_buffer(&canvas);
// ...
// create resizing handler for window
{
let on_resize = Closure::<dyn FnMut(_)>::new(move |_event: Event| {
let canvas = canvas.clone();
// ...
update_buffer(&canvas);
// ...
window.add_event_listener_with_callback("resize", on_resize.as_ref().unchecked_ref())?;
on_resize.forget();
}
}
There we update the canvas buffer once the WASM module is loaded and then whenever the window is resized. We do it by manually specifying width and height of canvas as values of clientWidth and clientHeight. Maybe there are better ways to update the buffer but I believe this solution is better than those suggested by #SamB, #CoderNaveed, #Anthony Gedeon, #Bluerain, #Ben Jackson, #Manolo, #XaviGuardia, #Russel Harkins, and #fermar because
The element is styled by CSS, not HTML.
Unlike elem.style.width & elem.style.height trick used by #Manolo or its JQuery equivalent used by #XaviGuardia, it will work for canvas whose size is specified by usage as flex or grid item.
Unlike the solution by #Russel Harkings, this also handles resizing. Though I like his answer because it is really clean and easy.
WASM is the future! Haha :D
P.S. there's a ton of .unwrap() because Rust explicitly handles possible failures.
P.P.S.
{
let on_resize = Closure::<dyn FnMut(_)>::new(move |_event: Event| {
let canvas = canvas.clone();
// ...
update_buffer(&canvas);
// ...
window.add_event_listener_with_callback("resize", on_resize.as_ref().unchecked_ref())?;
on_resize.forget();
}
can be done much cleaner with better libraries. E.g.
add_resize_handler(&window, move |e: ResizeEvent| {
let canvas = canvas.clone();
// ...
update_buffer(&canvas);
})

If you want a dynamic behaviour based on, e.g. CSS media queries, don't use canvas width and height attributes. Use CSS rules and then, before getting the canvas rendering context, assign to width and height attributes the CSS width and height styles:
var elem = document.getElementById("mycanvas");
elem.width = elem.style.width;
elem.height = elem.style.height;
var ctx1 = elem.getContext("2d");
...

Why are my drawings sized relatively to the canvas size?

I have a canvas defined as
<canvas id="field"></canvas>
style.css:
canvas#field {
width: 500px;
height: 250px;
border: 3px solid black; /* for now */
}
Whenever I try drawing stuff on it, like
var ctx = field.getContext("2d")
// circle
ctx.beginPath();
ctx.arc(100, 75, 50, 0, 2 * Math.PI);
ctx.stroke();
It always ends up being sized relatively to the canvas dimensions. If I make the canvas twice as big, the circle is also twice as big, even though my radius is always 50px. If I make my canvas a square, the circle becomes elongated downwards, and vice versa if I stretch the canvas out sideways.
How do I make the canvas treat the numbers I give it as absolute values?

You should set canvas width and height as HTML attributes instead of CSS rules:
<canvas id="field" width="500" height="250"></canvas>
Quoting MDN:
The <canvas> element has only two attributes, width and height. These are both optional and can also be set using DOM properties. When no width and height attributes are specified, the canvas will initially be 300 pixels wide and 150 pixels high. The element can be sized arbitrarily by CSS, but during rendering the image is scaled to fit its layout size: if the CSS sizing doesn't respect the ratio of the initial canvas, it will appear distorted.
You can also set width and height dynamically using JavaScript:
const canvas = document.querySelector('canvas');
canvas.width = '500';
canvas.height = '250';

Dimensions of a canvas

I found this pretty awesome blog post that explains how to resize a canvas to fit any screen http://www.html5rocks.com/en/tutorials/casestudies/gopherwoord-studios-resizing-html5-games/ I implemented it and it is sizing it flawlessly but I get this problem that my objects appear off screen when the canvas is too little.
For example for my game I define a world with dimensions width 480 and height 1024, if I put an element on x axis at about 400 but the display that is currently used is 360px wide then the canvas would have correct ratio of width to height 0.46875 but the object will not be visible.
To solve this problem I suppose I need to define a ratio between the absolute world dimensions and the screen dimensions and multiply by that when I'm calculating the object's position, however my question is - is there a way for the canvas to do that automatically?

Both the canvas itself and the canvas element have a width and height. If they're not the same, the content of the canvas is automatically scaled to fit the element. So yes, you could define your canvas to be the size you want, and define the element such that it scales. Naturally, though, everything scales, and if the aspect ratio is different, your shapes get distorted.
The width and height of the canvas within the canvas element are controlled by the width and height attributes of the canvas element. (They default to 300 and 150, respectively.)
The width and height of the canvas element are controlled by CSS; they default to the width and height of the canvas, but you can override that with CSS.
For example: Here's a canvas that's 300x300 (thanks to the CSS), within a canvas element that's only 300x150 (because those are the default width and height of the canvas element). You can see the effect of scaling when I draw a circle in it — it comes out oval instead:
// Get the canvas element
const canvas = document.getElementById("clock");
// Get the 2D rendering context for it
const context = canvas.getContext("2d");
// Show the canvas's dimensions (NOT the dimensions of the element)
document.getElementById("dimensions").innerHTML = canvas.width + "x" + canvas.height;
// Draw a circle -- it comes out oval because of scaling
const path = new Path2D();
path.arc(75, 75, 50, 0, Math.PI * 2, true);
context.fillStyle = context.strokeStyle = "blue";
context.fill(path);
canvas#clock {
width: 300px;
height: 300px;
background: #1E1E1E;
}
<canvas id="clock"></canvas>
<div id="dimensions"></div>
Here's an example where the canvas and its container are the same width and height, so there's no scaling; the code is identical, it's just I've added width="300" height="300" to the canvas HTML:
// Get the canvas element
const canvas = document.getElementById("clock");
// Get the 2D rendering context for it
const context = canvas.getContext("2d");
// Show the canvas's dimensions (NOT the dimensions of the element)
document.getElementById("dimensions").innerHTML = canvas.width + "x" + canvas.height;
// Draw a circle
const path = new Path2D();
path.arc(75, 75, 50, 0, Math.PI * 2, true);
context.fillStyle = context.strokeStyle = "blue";
context.fill(path);
canvas#clock {
/* We could comment out the width and height properties
since they'll default to the values from the attributes
*/
width: 300px;
height: 300px;
background: #1E1E1E;
}
<canvas id="clock" width="300" height="300"></canvas>
<div id="dimensions"></div>
The automatic scaling is handy provided you ensure the aspect ratio of the element and its canvas are the same. If you don't directly set the size of the canvas element, on most browsers it will default to the aspect ratio of the canvas thanks to the width and height attributes. From MDN's coverage of aspect-ratio:
Browsers have added an internal aspect-ratio property that applies to replaced elements and other related elements that accept width and height attributes. This appears in the browser's internal UA stylesheet.
In Firefox, the internal stylesheet rule looks like this:
img, input[type="image"], video, embed, iframe, marquee, object, table {
aspect-ratio: attr(width) / attr(height);
}

Canvas doesn't follow up resize of image?

I've got the following piece of code:
HTML
<img src="http://hollywoodteenonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/justin_bieber_someday_fragrance_dree_hemingway.jpg" id="imagem"/>
<canvas id="mycanvas">
CSS
#mycanvas{
height:200px;
width: 200px;
border: solid;
color: black;
}
#imagem{
height:200px;
width: 200px;
}
Javascript
var canvas = document.getElementById("mycanvas"),
ctx = canvas.getContext("2d"),
img = document.getElementById("imagem");
ctx.drawImage(img,0,0);
As you can see, the canvas doens't follow up the resize of the original image. As the code is written it "should" show all of the source but resized to de designated canvas. Is there any way to go around this?

Issues
First issue is that you don't set a size for your canvas element by using its properties. This is the only way you can affect the content of the canvas and not settings it means it will default to 300 x 150 pixel no matter what you set as CSS rule for it.
Second issue is that you are using CSS to the set size. This will affect the element itself, not the content of the canvas. Technically this isn't wrong in case you want to scale the canvas as an image, but it won't do anything for the canvas and the result is that you just scale the 300x150 pixels around.
The third issue, if the image is of different size than 300x150 it won't fit the canvas (too small or get cropped if too big).
Solutions
One solution is to set the size of the canvas to the size of the image and paint the image in:
canvas.width = img.width;
canvas.height = img.height;
ctx.drawImage(img, 0, 0);
Now you can resize the canvas (as an image using CSS) if you want.
Or you can scale the image using the size of the canvas (remove the CSS rule; and you still need to set a size for canvas):
ctx.drawImage(img, 0, 0, canvas.width, canvas.height);
LIVE DEMO HERE
You also need to take care in how you invoke your script. For images to work with canvas they need to be loaded. As they load asynchronous you need to handle load events one way or another (ie. inside a window.onload in this case).

HTML5 canvas stroke() thick and fuzzy

I'm trying to allow the user to draw a rectangle on the canvas (like a selection box). I'm getting some ridiculous results, but then I noticed that even just trying the code from my reference here, I get huge fuzzy lines and don't know why.
it's hosted at dylanstestserver.com/drawcss. the javascript is inline so you can check it out. I am using jQuery to simplify getting the mouse coordinates.

The blurry problem will happen if you use css to set the canvas height and width instead of setting height and width in the canvas element.
<style>
canvas { height: 800px; width: 1200px; } WRONG WAY -- BLURRY LINES
</style>
<canvas height="800" width="1200"></canvas> RIGHT WAY -- SHARP LINES

For some reason, your canvas is stretched. Because you have its css property width set to 100%, it is stretching it from some sort of native size. It's the difference between using the css width property and the width attribute on the <canvas> tag. You might want to try using a bit of javascript to make it fill the viewport (see jQuery .width()):
jQuery(document).ready(function(){
var canvas = document.getElementById('drawing');
canvas.width(($(window).width()).height($(window).height());
var context = canvas.getContext('2d');
//...

The way I do it is to set the canvas element to a width and height in the css, and then set the canvas.width = canvas.clientWidth and canvas.height = canvas.clientHeight
var canvas = document.getElementById("myCanvas");
canvas.width = canvas.clientWidth;
canvas.height = canvas.clientHeight;
var context = canvas.getContext("2d");

You haven't indicated canvas size in pixels, so it is scaled up. It is 300x150 here. Try setting the width, height

On retina displays you also need to scale (in addition to the accepted answer):
var context = canvas.getContext('2d');
context.scale(2,2);

The css sizing issue mentioned in these comments is correct, but another more subtle thing that can cause blurred lines is forgetting to call make a call to context.beginPath() before drawing a line. Without calling this, you will still get a line, but it won't be smoothed which makes the line looks like a series of steps.

I found the reason mine was blurry was that there was a slight discrepancy between the inline width and the CSS width.
I have both inline width/height parameters AND css width/height assigned to my canvas, because I need to keep its physical dimensions static, while increasing its inline dimensions for retina screens.
Check yours are the same if you have a situation like mine.