I tried to convert snippet 1 to snippet 2 but this did not work (the text fields did not clear). f3aa and f3bb are each text fields that I need to clear after a sumbit.
Snippet 1
var target=document.getElementById('f3aa');
target.value='';
var target=document.getElementById('f3bb');
target.value='';
Snippet 2
o1('f3aa')=o1('f3bb')='';
Snippet 3
function o1(a)
{
document.getElementById(a);
}
Assuming I've understood your question correctly, you were nearly there:
document.getElementById('f3aa').value = '';
document.getElementById('f3bb').value = '';
In your snippet 2, you are trying to assign an empty string to a DOM element, rather than the value property of that element.
In snippet 1, you assign a DOM element to the target variable, and then assign an empty string to the value property of the target variable. As target contains a DOM element, you assign that string to the value property of that element, which is equivalent to the code I have shown above.
You forgot to include the attribute names from your first snippet in your second:
document.getElementById('f3aa').value='';
document.getElementById('f3bb').value='';
(Note that this isn't really an "optimization" - there will be no noticeable difference in how quickly the two snippets run. Use whichever is more readable.)
X('f3aa').value = X('f3bb').value = '';
where X is your query-by-ID implementation.
Live demo: http://jsfiddle.net/zmr29/
(I wrote a X function in my demo, but I assume that you either use a library or have some other shorthand for DOM queries.)
I think it's illegal to use var to declare a variable more than once in the same scope.
This code is bad:
var test = true;
var test = false;
This code is good:
var test = true;
test = false; // <-- no "var" keyword here
Related
When I do:
var x = $("#listing")
I get back html element with id listing,
And when I do $(x) or $($("#listing")), I get the same.
What is difference b/w two?
$() will convert something to a jQuery object (or collection). This is not the same as a Javascript variable.
When you store #listing in a variable such as var x = '#listing', you are simply passing a string to the jQuery constructor, which is then interpreted as a selector by Sizzle, jQuery's selector engine.
In the example provided, there is no difference between the two following lines:
var x = $('#listing');
var x = '#listing',
$x = $(x);
In the first snippet, x is identical to $x in the second.
In the interest of completeness, the jQuery constructor can also accept a mixed type variable as its first parameter; it doesn't have to be a string. For example, it's possible to convert a DOMElement variable into a jQuery object using the following syntax:
var ele = document.getElementById('myItem'),
$ele = $(ele);
Notice that $ele now has access to jQuery's own functions, such as addClass(), etc. Please see this demo.
Furthermore, passing a jQuery object to the constructor will simply return the same jQuery object. For example, given the following snippet:
var $x = $('#listing'),
$x2 = $( $x );
$x is identical to $x2.
Your x variable was made a jQuery object once it found the dorm item.
Once you run var x = $('#listing'); x has everything wrapping it has.
Thus you can run x.addClass('thing')
Adding $ is creating jQuery object, its not normal variable. You can create jQuery object from DOM element, from another jQuery object or from normal javascript variable. Try to run console.log(x) console.log($(x)) and it will tell you all differences.
I wanna make a varible shortcut $$() so that i can use shortcut like $() [jquery] to save code in my project(ALL MY CODE IS PURE JAVASCRIPT).
when i put the string of id or class, it works all right, but when i put the tagName, it shows Cannot read property 'style' of undefined, it seems that the code is right,help,thanks
One more, is that way to defined a shortcut variable $$() to use in pure javascript environment right way? or is there any best practice to define a global variable like this?
window.onload = function(){
function $$(ele){
var pattern1 = /#/g;
var pattern2 = /\./g;
var pattern3 = /!/g;
var matches = ele.match(/[^#\.!]/g);//array
var elementS = matches.join("");
//alert(matches+elementS);
// console.log(document.getElementsByTagName(elementS));
var spaceExist = /\s/.test(elementS)
if(pattern1.test(ele)){
return document.getElementById(elementS);
}else if(pattern2.test(ele)){
//console.log(elementS);
return document.getElementsByClassName(elementS);
}else if(pattern3.test(ele)){
alert('hi');
console.log(elementS);
return document.getElementsByTagName(elementS);
}else if(spaceExist){
return document.querySelectorAll(elementS);
}
}
$$('#hme').style.backgroundColor = 'red';
$$('.myp')[0].style.backgroundColor = 'green';
$$('!h2')[0].style.display = 'none';//this not work,shows Cannot read property 'setAttribute' of undefined
}
<h1 id="hme">hi,friend</h1>
<p class="myp">mmdfdfd</p>
<h2>hhhhhh</h2>
Have you stepped through your code? Look at pattern #2:
var pattern2 = /./g;
That pattern will match any character at all given that's what the period represents in regular expressions - ref: http://www.regular-expressions.info/dot.html.
Therefore, this conditional is satisfied and returns its result:
else if(pattern2.test(ele)){
return document.getElementsByClassName(elementS);
}
Given there appears to be no element with a class name of h2 (which is the value of elementS), the return value is undefined.
Given that undefined has no properties, interrogating for the style property will produce the error you are seeing.
My advise is use one shortcut since you already using querySelectorAll:
window.$ = document.querySelectorAll.bind(document)
or if you rather need first element
window.$ = document.querySelector.bind(document)
this way you'll be able to do everything you are doing with normal css selectors and not obfuscated !tag for just tag
If speed actually matters, you will save some ticks by just having two aliases:
window.$ = document.querySelector.bind(document)
window.$el = document.getElementById.bind(document)
and calling $el when you need it specifically, instead of trying to make method polymorph.
Mister Epic's answer spots the main issue. Your h2 call is getting caught in that if statement, and that's why your error is happening. You need to make sure it doesn't get caught there, either by creating another pattern, or specifying in your second if statement that your 'ele' doesn't contain an '!'.
After that, in your third if statement:
else if(pattern3.test(ele)){
alert(hi); <---
console.log(elementS);
return document.getElementsByTagName(elementS);
The problem with this is you're going to alert(hi), but hi isn't defined. Make sure you wrap it in quotes.
Should be looking good after that.
I am updating a text value and I'm not sure why the first block of code doesn't work, but the alternate block does. Can someone explain this to me? They seem equivalent.
//doesn't update
newAtomicNum = 2;
oldAtomicNum = document.getElementById("atomicNumber").firstChild.nodeValue;
oldAtomicNum = newAtomicNum;
*versus* //does update
newAtomicNum = 2;
oldAtomicNum = document.getElementById("atomicNumber");
oldAtomicNum.firstChild.nodeValue = newAtomicNum;
When calling nodeValue without setting it, it returns the current nodeValue, not a reference to the property.
So an element looking like
<div id="atomicNumber">test</div>
Where you call
var oldAtomicNum = document.getElementById("atomicNumber").firstChild.nodeValue;
oldAtomicNum now contains the string test, so setting the variable to something else does not update the elements nodeValue
They're very different indeed.
In your first example, all you're updating is the variable, oldAtomicNum. There's no enduring link between that and document.getElementById("atomicNumber").firstChild.nodeValue at all. Assignment (=) copies values, it doesn't create references.
Note that this is very different from this:
newAtomicNum = 2;
atomicNum = document.getElementById("atomicNumber").firstChild;
atomicNum.nodeValue = newAtomicNum;
...which updates the value. The reason that works is that on the second line, the value we're copying into atomicNum is an object reference. Then we use that reference on the third line, assigning to one of the object's properties.
Say I have to following code:
var numb = $(selector).length;
And now I want to dynamicly make variables based on this:
var temp+numb = ...
How would I be able to do this?
Edit:
I know some of you will tell me to use an array. Normally I would agree but in my case the var is already an array and I rly see no other solution than creating dynamic names.
Variables in Javascript are bound to objects. Objects accept both . and [] notation. So you could do:
var num = 3;
window["foo"+num] = "foobar";
console.log(foo3);
PS - Just because you can do that doesn't mean you should, though.
In global scope (not recommended):
window["temp"+numb]='somevalue;
window.console && console.log(temp3);
In a scope you create - also works serverside where there is no window scope
var myScope={};
myScope["temp"+numb]="someValue";
window.console && console.log(myScope.temp3);
okay im working with a friend and he sent me js file which included a variable that included the ternary operator. I cant figure out how to change it to if..else. can you help please?
also i noticed ".length" didnt have the normal "()" after it, is there a reason why?
var nextRadioTab = activeRadioTab.next().length ? activeRadioTab.next() : $('#contentslider div:eq(0)');
Does this work?
if (activeRadioTab.next().length) {
var nextRadioTab = activeRadioTab.next();
} else {
var nextRadioTab = $('#contentslider div:eq(0)');
}
In JavaScript, objects are more-or-less just a list of names pointing to values. Each name-value pair is called a "property".
These values themselves can be any type of value, including a function. If the value of a property is a function, we call that a "method".
Say you want an object to track the x and y coordinates of a point.
var point = { x: 10, y: 20 };
In this case we can just use simple values, because we don't need any behaviour more advanced than getting a value (alert(point.x)) or setting one (point.x = 10).
jQuery is designed to let your code work on different browsers; different browsers behave differently in lots of situations, so jQuery can't just let you set
element.text = "hello world"
because depending on the type of object element is, it will need to modify different properties on different browsers. For this reason, jQuery makes you use methods for things like this:
element.text("hello world")
The .length attribute of a jQuery object is simple; it's controlled by jQuery itself and doesn't need to do any special things in different browsers. For this reason, you just use it directly. If they needed more complicated behaviour, they would use a function/method instead:
var myObject = { length: 2 }; // myObject.length
var myObject = { length: function() { return 2; } }; // myObject.length()
var nextRadioTab;
if (activeRadioTab.next().length)
nextRadioTab = activeRadioTab.next();
else
nextRadioTab = $('#contentslider div:eq(0)');
length is a property of whatever next() returns, which is most likely the same type of object as activeRadioTab.