How to overload a JavaScript function? (changing Slickgrid's editor) - javascript

I'm using Slickgrid and I would like to change behavior of editor. Instead of copy&paste I tried to overload one of functions but it doesn't work. I cannot read loadValue function.
loadValue is defined as (some code omitted)
IntegerCellEditor : function(args) {
this.loadValue = function(item) {
defaultValue = item[args.column.field];
$input.val(defaultValue);
$input[0].defaultValue = defaultValue;
$input.select();
};
}
What I tried is:
function tristateIntegerCellEditor(check_field) {
var f = IntegerCellEditor;
var f_loadValue = f.loadValue;
f.loadValue = function(item) {
f_loadValue(item);
if (check_field) {
if (!item[check_field]) {
$select.disable();
}
}
};
return f;
}
Is there any way to substitute my function?

You need f_loadValue.call(this, item);
Otherwise the old loadValue get's called with it's context (this) as window (the default).
Related:
Adding hooks
_.wrap

Related

In javascript how can I run a command when the value of a variable changes? [duplicate]

Is it possible to have an event in JS that fires when the value of a certain variable changes? JQuery is accepted.
This question was originally posted in 2009 and most of the existing answers are either outdated, ineffective, or require the inclusion of large bloated libraries:
Object.watch and Object.observe are both deprecated and should not be used.
onPropertyChange is a DOM element event handler that only works in some versions of IE.
Object.defineProperty allows you to make an object property immutable, which would allow you to detect attempted changes, but it would also block any changes.
Defining setters and getters works, but it requires a lot of setup code and it does not work well when you need to delete or create new properties.
As of 2018, you can now use the Proxy object to monitor (and intercept) changes made to an object. It is purpose built for what the OP is trying to do. Here's a basic example:
var targetObj = {};
var targetProxy = new Proxy(targetObj, {
set: function (target, key, value) {
console.log(`${key} set to ${value}`);
target[key] = value;
return true;
}
});
targetProxy.hello_world = "test"; // console: 'hello_world set to test'
The only drawbacks of the Proxy object are:
The Proxy object is not available in older browsers (such as IE11) and the polyfill cannot fully replicate Proxy functionality.
Proxy objects do not always behave as expected with special objects (e.g., Date) -- the Proxy object is best paired with plain Objects or Arrays.
If you need to observe changes made to a nested object, then you need to use a specialized library such as Observable Slim (which I have published). It works like this:
var test = {testing:{}};
var p = ObservableSlim.create(test, true, function(changes) {
console.log(JSON.stringify(changes));
});
p.testing.blah = 42; // console: [{"type":"add","target":{"blah":42},"property":"blah","newValue":42,"currentPath":"testing.blah",jsonPointer:"/testing/blah","proxy":{"blah":42}}]
Yes, this is now completely possible!
I know this is an old thread but now this effect is possible using accessors (getters and setters): https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Guide/Working_with_Objects#Defining_getters_and_setters
You can define an object like this, in which aInternal represents the field a:
x = {
aInternal: 10,
aListener: function(val) {},
set a(val) {
this.aInternal = val;
this.aListener(val);
},
get a() {
return this.aInternal;
},
registerListener: function(listener) {
this.aListener = listener;
}
}
Then you can register a listener using the following:
x.registerListener(function(val) {
alert("Someone changed the value of x.a to " + val);
});
So whenever anything changes the value of x.a, the listener function will be fired. Running the following line will bring the alert popup:
x.a = 42;
See an example here: https://jsfiddle.net/5o1wf1bn/1/
You can also user an array of listeners instead of a single listener slot, but I wanted to give you the simplest possible example.
Using Prototype: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Object/defineProperty
// Console
function print(t) {
var c = document.getElementById('console');
c.innerHTML = c.innerHTML + '<br />' + t;
}
// Demo
var myVar = 123;
Object.defineProperty(this, 'varWatch', {
get: function () { return myVar; },
set: function (v) {
myVar = v;
print('Value changed! New value: ' + v);
}
});
print(varWatch);
varWatch = 456;
print(varWatch);
<pre id="console">
</pre>
Other example
// Console
function print(t) {
var c = document.getElementById('console');
c.innerHTML = c.innerHTML + '<br />' + t;
}
// Demo
var varw = (function (context) {
/**
* Declare a new variable.
*
* #param {string} Variable name.
* #param {any | undefined} varValue Default/Initial value.
* You can use an object reference for example.
*/
return function (varName, varValue) {
var value = varValue;
Object.defineProperty(context, varName, {
get: function () { return value; },
set: function (v) {
value = v;
print('Value changed! New value: ' + value);
}
});
};
})(window);
varw('varWatch'); // Declare without initial value
print(varWatch);
varWatch = 456;
print(varWatch);
print('---');
varw('otherVarWatch', 123); // Declare with initial value
print(otherVarWatch);
otherVarWatch = 789;
print(otherVarWatch);
<pre id="console">
</pre>
No.
But, if it's really that important, you have 2 options (first is tested, second isn't):
First, use setters and getters, like so:
var myobj = {a : 1};
function create_gets_sets(obj) { // make this a framework/global function
var proxy = {}
for ( var i in obj ) {
if (obj.hasOwnProperty(i)) {
var k = i;
proxy["set_"+i] = function (val) { this[k] = val; };
proxy["get_"+i] = function () { return this[k]; };
}
}
for (var i in proxy) {
if (proxy.hasOwnProperty(i)) {
obj[i] = proxy[i];
}
}
}
create_gets_sets(myobj);
then you can do something like:
function listen_to(obj, prop, handler) {
var current_setter = obj["set_" + prop];
var old_val = obj["get_" + prop]();
obj["set_" + prop] = function(val) { current_setter.apply(obj, [old_val, val]); handler(val));
}
then set the listener like:
listen_to(myobj, "a", function(oldval, newval) {
alert("old : " + oldval + " new : " + newval);
}
Second, you could put a watch on the value:
Given myobj above, with 'a' on it:
function watch(obj, prop, handler) { // make this a framework/global function
var currval = obj[prop];
function callback() {
if (obj[prop] != currval) {
var temp = currval;
currval = obj[prop];
handler(temp, currval);
}
}
return callback;
}
var myhandler = function (oldval, newval) {
//do something
};
var intervalH = setInterval(watch(myobj, "a", myhandler), 100);
myobj.set_a(2);
Sorry to bring up an old thread, but here is a little manual for those who (like me!) don't see how Eli Grey's example works:
var test = new Object();
test.watch("elem", function(prop,oldval,newval){
//Your code
return newval;
});
Hope this can help someone
As Luke Schafer's answer (note: this refers to his original post; but the whole point here remains valid after the edit), I would also suggest a pair of Get/Set methods to access your value.
However I would suggest some modifications (and that's why I'm posting...).
A problem with that code is that the field a of the object myobj is directly accessible, so it's possible to access it / change its value without triggering the listeners:
var myobj = { a : 5, get_a : function() { return this.a;}, set_a : function(val) { this.a = val; }}
/* add listeners ... */
myobj.a = 10; // no listeners called!
Encapsulation
So, to guarantee that the listeners are actually called, we would have to prohibit that direct access to the field a. How to do so? Use a closure!
var myobj = (function() { // Anonymous function to create scope.
var a = 5; // 'a' is local to this function
// and cannot be directly accessed from outside
// this anonymous function's scope
return {
get_a : function() { return a; }, // These functions are closures:
set_a : function(val) { a = val; } // they keep reference to
// something ('a') that was on scope
// where they were defined
};
})();
Now you can use the same method to create and add the listeners as Luke proposed, but you can rest assured that there's no possible way to read from or write to a going unnoticed!
Adding encapsulated fields programmatically
Still on Luke's track, I propose now a simple way to add encapsulated fields and the respective getters/setters to objects by the means of a simple function call.
Note that this will only work properly with value types. For this to work with reference types, some kind of deep copy would have to be implemented (see this one, for instance).
function addProperty(obj, name, initial) {
var field = initial;
obj["get_" + name] = function() { return field; }
obj["set_" + name] = function(val) { field = val; }
}
This works the same as before: we create a local variable on a function, and then we create a closure.
How to use it? Simple:
var myobj = {};
addProperty(myobj, "total", 0);
window.alert(myobj.get_total() == 0);
myobj.set_total(10);
window.alert(myobj.get_total() == 10);
Recently found myself with the same issue. Wanted to listen for on change of a variable and do some stuff when the variable changed.
Someone suggested a simple solution of setting the value using a setter.
Declaring a simple object that keeps the value of my variable here:
var variableObject = {
value: false,
set: function (value) {
this.value = value;
this.getOnChange();
}
}
The object contains a set method via which I can change the value. But it also calls a getOnChange() method in there. Will define it now.
variableObject.getOnChange = function() {
if(this.value) {
// do some stuff
}
}
Now whenever I do variableObject.set(true), the getOnChange method fires, and if the value was set as desired (in my case: true), the if block also executes.
This is the simplest way I found to do this stuff.
If you're using jQuery {UI} (which everyone should be using :-) ), you can use .change() with a hidden <input/> element.
AngularJS (I know this is not JQuery, but that might help. [Pure JS is good in theory only]):
$scope.$watch('data', function(newValue) { ..
where "data" is name of your variable in the scope.
There is a link to doc.
For those tuning in a couple years later:
A solution for most browsers (and IE6+) is available that uses the onpropertychange event and the newer spec defineProperty. The slight catch is that you'll need to make your variable a dom object.
Full details:
http://johndyer.name/native-browser-get-set-properties-in-javascript/
Easiest way I have found, starting from this answer:
// variable holding your data
const state = {
count: null,
update() {
console.log(`this gets called and your value is ${this.pageNumber}`);
},
get pageNumber() {
return this.count;
},
set pageNumber(pageNumber) {
this.count = pageNumber;
// here you call the code you need
this.update(this.count);
}
};
And then:
state.pageNumber = 0;
// watch the console
state.pageNumber = 15;
// watch the console
The functionality you're looking for can be achieved through the use of the "defineProperty()" method--which is only available to modern browsers:
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Object/defineProperty
I've written a jQuery extension that has some similar functionality if you need more cross browser support:
https://github.com/jarederaj/jQueue
A small jQuery extension that handles queuing callbacks to the
existence of a variable, object, or key. You can assign any number of
callbacks to any number of data points that might be affected by
processes running in the background. jQueue listens and waits for
these data you specify to come into existence and then fires off the
correct callback with its arguments.
Not directly: you need a pair getter/setter with an "addListener/removeListener" interface of some sort... or an NPAPI plugin (but that's another story altogether).
A rather simple and simplistic solution is to just use a function call to set the value of the global variable, and never set its value directly. This way you have total control:
var globalVar;
function setGlobalVar(value) {
globalVar = value;
console.log("Value of globalVar set to: " + globalVar);
//Whatever else
}
There is no way to enforce this, it just requires programming discipline... though you can use grep (or something similar) to check that nowhere does your code directly set the value of globalVar.
Or you could encapsulate it in an object and user getter and setter methods... just a thought.
With the help of getter and setter, you can define a JavaScript class that does such a thing.
First, we define our class called MonitoredVariable:
class MonitoredVariable {
constructor(initialValue) {
this._innerValue = initialValue;
this.beforeSet = (newValue, oldValue) => {};
this.beforeChange = (newValue, oldValue) => {};
this.afterChange = (newValue, oldValue) => {};
this.afterSet = (newValue, oldValue) => {};
}
set val(newValue) {
const oldValue = this._innerValue;
// newValue, oldValue may be the same
this.beforeSet(newValue, oldValue);
if (oldValue !== newValue) {
this.beforeChange(newValue, oldValue);
this._innerValue = newValue;
this.afterChange(newValue, oldValue);
}
// newValue, oldValue may be the same
this.afterSet(newValue, oldValue);
}
get val() {
return this._innerValue;
}
}
Assume that we want to listen for money changes, let's create an instance of MonitoredVariable with initial money 0:
const money = new MonitoredVariable(0);
Then we could get or set its value using money.val:
console.log(money.val); // Get its value
money.val = 2; // Set its value
Since we have not defined any listeners for it, nothing special happens after money.val changes to 2.
Now let's define some listeners. We have four listeners available: beforeSet, beforeChange, afterChange, afterSet.
The following will happen sequentially when you use money.val = newValue to change variable's value:
money.beforeSet(newValue, oldValue);
money.beforeChange(newValue, oldValue); (Will be skipped if its value not changed)
money.val = newValue;
money.afterChange(newValue, oldValue); (Will be skipped if its value not changed)
money.afterSet(newValue, oldValue);
Now we define afterChange listener which be triggered only after money.val has changed (while afterSet will be triggered even if the new value is the same as the old one):
money.afterChange = (newValue, oldValue) => {
console.log(`Money has been changed from ${oldValue} to ${newValue}`);
};
Now set a new value 3 and see what happens:
money.val = 3;
You will see the following in the console:
Money has been changed from 2 to 3
For full code, see https://gist.github.com/yusanshi/65745acd23c8587236c50e54f25731ab.
In my case, I was trying to find out if any library I was including in my project was redefining my window.player. So, at the begining of my code, I just did:
Object.defineProperty(window, 'player', {
get: () => this._player,
set: v => {
console.log('window.player has been redefined!');
this._player = v;
}
});
Based On akira's answer I added that you can manipulate the dom through the listerner.
https://jsfiddle.net/2zcr0Lnh/2/
javascript:
x = {
aInternal: 10,
aListener: function(val) {},
set a(val) {
this.aInternal = val;
this.aListener(val);
},
get a() {
return this.aInternal;
},
registerListener: function(listener) {
this.aListener = listener;
}
}
x.registerListener(function(val) {
document.getElementById('showNumber').innerHTML = val;
});
x.a = 50;
function onClick(){
x.a = x.a + 1;
}
html:
<div id="showNumber">
</div>
<button onclick="onClick()">
click me to rerender
</button>
The registerListener method is fired when the variable x.a changes.
//ex:
/*
var x1 = {currentStatus:undefined};
your need is x1.currentStatus value is change trigger event ?
below the code is use try it.
*/
function statusChange(){
console.log("x1.currentStatus_value_is_changed"+x1.eventCurrentStatus);
};
var x1 = {
eventCurrentStatus:undefined,
get currentStatus(){
return this.eventCurrentStatus;
},
set currentStatus(val){
this.eventCurrentStatus=val;
//your function();
}
};
or
/* var x1 = {
eventCurrentStatus:undefined,
currentStatus : {
get : function(){
return Events.eventCurrentStatus
},
set : function(status){
Events.eventCurrentStatus=status;
},
}*/
console.log("eventCurrentStatus = "+ x1.eventCurrentStatus);
x1.currentStatus="create"
console.log("eventCurrentStatus = "+ x1.eventCurrentStatus);
x1.currentStatus="edit"
console.log("eventCurrentStatus = "+ x1.eventCurrentStatus);
console.log("currentStatus = "+ x1.currentStatus);
or
/* global variable ku*/
var jsVarEvents={};
Object.defineProperty(window, "globalvar1", {//no i18n
get: function() { return window.jsVarEvents.globalvarTemp},
set: function(value) { window.window.jsVarEvents.globalvarTemp = value; }
});
console.log(globalvar1);
globalvar1=1;
console.log(globalvar1);
Please guys remember the initial question was for VARIABLES, not for OBJECTS ;)
in addition to all answers above, I created a tiny lib called forTheWatch.js,
that use the same way to catch and callback for changes in normal global variables in javascript.
Compatible with JQUERY variables, no need to use OBJECTS, and you can pass directly an ARRAY of several variables if needed.
If it can be helpful... :
https://bitbucket.org/esabora/forthewatch Basically you just have to call the function :
watchIt("theVariableToWatch", "varChangedFunctionCallback");
And sorry by advance if not relevant.
The question is about variables, not object properties! So my approach is to take advantage of the window object, with its custom getters/setters, and then use/change the variable like a "normal" variable (not like an object property).
The simplest way is that of #José Antonio Postigo in his answer (i voted that answer). What I'd like to do here, is to reduce that to an even simpler "creator" function (so even someone that does not understand object getters/setters can easily use it).
A live example is here: https://codepen.io/dimvai/pen/LYzzbpz
This is the general "creator" function you must have as is:
let createWatchedVariable = (variableName,initialValue,callbackFunction) => {
// set default callback=console.log if missing
callbackFunction ??= function(){console.log(variableName+" changed to " + window[variableName])};
// the actual useful code:
Object.defineProperty(window, variableName, {
set: function(value) {window["_"+variableName] = value; callbackFunction()},
get: function() {return window["_"+variableName]}
});
window[variableName]=initialValue??null;
};
Then, instead of declaring the variable using var or let, use this:
// 1st approach - default callback//
createWatchedVariable ('myFirstVariable',12);
// instead of: let myFirstVariable = 12;
Or, in order to use your custom callback (instead of the default console.log) use:
// 2nd approach - set a custom callback//
var myCallback = ()=>{/*your custom code...*/}
// now use callback function as the third optional argument
createWatchedVariable('mySecondVariable',0,myCallback);
That's it! Now, you can change it like a "normal" variable:
myFirstVariable = 15; // logs to console
myFirstVariable++; // logs to console
mySecondVariable = 1001; // executes your custom code
mySecondVariable++; // executes your custom code
The solution of #akira and #mo-d-genesis can be further simplified because the DOM manipulation does not depend on state in this example:
CodePen
const render = (val) => {
document.getElementById("numberDiv").innerHTML = val;
};
state = {
_value_internal: undefined,
set value(val) {
// 1. set state value
this._value_internal = val;
// 2. render user interface
render(val);
},
get value() {
return this._value_internal;
},
};
const onClick = () => {
state.value = state.value + 1; // state change leads to re-render!
};
// set default value
state.value = 0;
The corresponding html:
<div id="numberDiv"></div>
<button onclick="onClick()">
Click to rerender
</button>
Remarks:
I renamed variables and functions to better reflect their semantics.
FYI: Svelte offers a very similar reactive behavior by changing variables
It's not directly possible.
However, this can be done using CustomEvent: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/CustomEvent/CustomEvent
The below method accepts an array of variable names as an input and adds event listener for each variable and triggers the event for any changes to the value of the variables.
The Method uses polling to detect the change in the value. You can increase the value for timeout in milliseconds.
function watchVariable(varsToWatch) {
let timeout = 1000;
let localCopyForVars = {};
let pollForChange = function () {
for (let varToWatch of varsToWatch) {
if (localCopyForVars[varToWatch] !== window[varToWatch]) {
let event = new CustomEvent('onVar_' + varToWatch + 'Change', {
detail: {
name: varToWatch,
oldValue: localCopyForVars[varToWatch],
newValue: window[varToWatch]
}
});
document.dispatchEvent(event);
localCopyForVars[varToWatch] = window[varToWatch];
}
}
setTimeout(pollForChange, timeout);
};
let respondToNewValue = function (varData) {
console.log("The value of the variable " + varData.name + " has been Changed from " + varData.oldValue + " to " + varData.newValue + "!!!");
}
for (let varToWatch of varsToWatch) {
localCopyForVars[varToWatch] = window[varToWatch];
document.addEventListener('onVar_' + varToWatch + 'Change', function (e) {
respondToNewValue(e.detail);
});
}
setTimeout(pollForChange, timeout);
}
By calling the Method:
watchVariables(['username', 'userid']);
It will detect the changes to variables username and userid.
This is what I did: Call JSON.stringify twice and compare the two strings...
Drawbacks:
You can only know whether the whole object changes
You have to detect changes manually
You better have only primitive fields in the object(no properties, no functions...)
This is NOT a production ideal answer, but what it is doing is setting an interval in JavaScript for every 100 milliseconds and checking to see if the variable is changed and when it is, it does something (anything intended by the OP) and then clears the interval, so it sort of simulates what the OP is asking.
let myvar = "myvar";
const checkChange = setInterval(() => {
if (myvar !== "myvar") {
console.log("My precious var has been changed!");
clearInterval(checkChange);
}
}, 100);
Now if myvar gets changed to something else then this program will say "My precious var has been changed!" :)
This is an old great question, has more than 12 years. Also, there are many ways to solve it. However, most of then are complicated or using old JS concepts we are in 2022 and we can use ES6 to improve our code.
I will implemented two main solutions that I constantly use.
Simple variable
If we have a simple variable and we don't care about reutilization then we can declare our variable as an object. We define a set and get methods and a listener attribute to handle the "change" event.
const $countBtn = document.getElementById('counter')
const $output = document.getElementById('output')
const counter = {
v: 0,
listener: undefined,
set value(v) {
this.v = v
if (this.listener) this.listener(v)
},
get value() { return this.v },
count() { this.value++ },
registerListener(callback) {
this.listener = callback
},
}
const countOnClick = () => { counter.count() }
$countBtn.onclick = countOnClick
counter.registerListener(v => {
$output.textContent = v
})
counter.value = 50
#output {
display: block;
font-size: 2em;
margin-top: 0.67em;
margin-bottom: 0.67em;
margin-left: 0;
margin-right: 0;
font-weight: bold;
}
<button id="counter">Count</button>
<div id="output"></div>
Advanced Class for reusability
If we will have multiple variables and we need to monitor them, we can create a class and then apply it to our variables. I recommend to add two listeners one beforeChange and afterChange this will give you flexibility to use the variable in different process.
class ObservableObject {
constructor(v) {
this.v = v ?? 0
this.on = {
beforeChange(newValue, oldValue) {},
afterChange(newValue, oldValue) {},
}
}
set value(newValue) {
const oldValue = this.v
// newValue, oldValue are the same
if (oldValue === newValue) return
this.on.beforeChange(newValue, oldValue)
this.v = newValue
this.on.afterChange(newValue, oldValue)
}
get value() { return this.v }
}
const $countABtn = document.getElementById('counter-a')
const $countBBtn = document.getElementById('counter-b')
const $outputA = document.getElementById('output-a')
const $outputB = document.getElementById('output-b')
const counterA = new ObservableObject()
const counterB = new ObservableObject()
const countOnClick = counter => { counter.value++ }
const onChange = (v, output) => { output.textContent = v }
$countABtn.onclick = () => { countOnClick(counterA) }
$countBBtn.onclick = () => { countOnClick(counterB) }
counterA.on.afterChange = v => { onChange(v, $outputA) }
counterB.on.afterChange = v => { onChange(v, $outputB) }
counterA.value = 50
counterB.value = 20
.wrapper {
display: flex;
flex-flow: row wrap;
justify-content: center;
align-items: center;
width: 100vw
}
.item {
width: 50%
}
.output {
display: block;
font-size: 2em;
margin-top: 0.67em;
margin-bottom: 0.67em;
margin-left: 0;
margin-right: 0;
font-weight: bold;
}
<div class="wrapper">
<div class="item">
<button id="counter-a">Count A</button>
<div id="output-a" class="output"></div>
</div>
<div class="item">
<button id="counter-b">Count B</button>
<div id="output-b" class="output"></div>
</div>
</div>
This is an old thread but I stumbled onto second highest answer (custom listeners) while looking for a solution using Angular. While the solution works, angular has a better built in way to resolve this using #Output and event emitters. Going off of the example in custom listener answer:
ChildComponent.html
<button (click)="increment(1)">Increment</button>
ChildComponent.ts
import {EventEmitter, Output } from '#angular/core';
#Output() myEmitter: EventEmitter<number> = new EventEmitter<number>();
private myValue: number = 0;
public increment(n: number){
this.myValue += n;
// Send a change event to the emitter
this.myEmitter.emit(this.myValue);
}
ParentComponent.html
<child-component (myEmitter)="monitorChanges($event)"></child-component>
<br/>
<label>{{n}}</label>
ParentComponent.ts
public n: number = 0;
public monitorChanges(n: number){
this.n = n;
console.log(n);
}
This will now update non parent each time the child button is clicked. Working stackblitz
I came here looking for same answer for node js. So here it is
const events = require('events');
const eventEmitter = new events.EventEmitter();
// Createing state to watch and trigger on change
let x = 10 // x is being watched for changes in do while loops below
do {
eventEmitter.emit('back to normal');
}
while (x !== 10);
do {
eventEmitter.emit('something changed');
}
while (x === 10);
What I am doing is setting some event emitters when values are changed and using do while loops to detect it.
I searched for JavaScript two-way data binding library and came across this one.
I did not succeed to make it work in DOM to variable direction, but in variable to DOM direction it works and that is what we need here.
I have rewritten it slightly, as the original code is very hard to read (for me). It uses
Object.defineProperty, so the second most upvoted answer by Eliot B. at least partially wrong.
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<title>TODO supply a title</title>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0">
<script>
const dataBind = (function () {
const getElementValue = function (selector) {
let element = document.querySelectorAll(selector)[0];
return 'value' in element ? element.value : element.innerHTML;
};
const setElementValue = function (selector, newValue) {
let elementArray = document.querySelectorAll(selector);
for (let i = 0; i < elementArray.length; i++) {
let element = elementArray[i];
if ('value' in element) {
element.value = newValue;
if (element.tagName.toLowerCase() === 'select'){
let options = element.querySelectorAll('option');
for (let option in options){
if (option.value === newValue){
option.selected = true;
break;
}
}
}
} else {
element.innerHTML = newValue;
}
}
};
const bindModelToView = function (selector, object, property, enumerable) {
Object.defineProperty(object, property, {
get: function () {
return getElementValue(selector);
},
set: function (newValue) {
setElementValue(selector, newValue);
},
configurable: true,
enumerable: (enumerable)
});
};
return {
bindModelToView
};
})();
</script>
</head>
<body>
<div style="padding: 20%;">
<input type="text" id="text" style="width: 40px;"/>
</div>
<script>
let x = {a: 1, b: 2};
dataBind.bindModelToView('#text', x, 'a'); //data to dom
setInterval(function () {
x.a++;
}, 1000);
</script>
</body>
</html>
JSFiddle.
JSFiddle with original code.
In the provided example a property of object x updated by the setInterval and value of text input automatically updated as well. If it is not enough and event is what you looking for, you can add onchange listener to the above input. Input also can be made hidden if needed.
Utils = {
eventRegister_globalVariable : function(variableName,handlers){
eventRegister_JsonVariable(this,variableName,handlers);
},
eventRegister_jsonVariable : function(jsonObj,variableName,handlers){
if(jsonObj.eventRegisteredVariable === undefined) {
jsonObj.eventRegisteredVariable={};//this Object is used for trigger event in javascript variable value changes ku
}
Object.defineProperty(jsonObj, variableName , {
get: function() {
return jsonObj.eventRegisteredVariable[variableName] },
set: function(value) {
jsonObj.eventRegisteredVariable[variableName] = value; handlers(jsonObj.eventRegisteredVariable[variableName]);}
});
}

Javascript, possible to pass undeclared method parameters without eval?

Ok, difficult to understand from the title only. Here is an example. I want a function to refer to a variable that is "injected" automagically, ie:
function abc() {
console.log(myVariable);
}
I have tried with:
with({myVariable: "value"}) { abc() }
but this doesn't work unless abc is declared within the with block, ie:
with({myVariable: "value"}) {
function abc() {
console.log(myVariable);
}
abc(); // This will work
}
So the last piece will work, but is it possible to fake the with statement, or do I have to force the developers to declare their function calls in a with statement?
Basically the call I want to do is:
doSomething({myVariable: "value"}, function() {
console.log(myVariable);
});
Ofcourse, I am aware I could pass this is a one parameter object, but that is not what I am trying to do:
doSomething({myVariable: "value"}, function(M) {
console.log(M.myVariable);
});
Further more, I am trying to avoid using eval:
with({myVariable: "value"}) {
eval(abc.toString())(); // Will also work
}
Is this not supported at at all beyond eval in Javascript?
JavaScript does not provide any straightforward way to achieve the syntax you're looking for. The only way to inject a variable into a Lexical Environment is by using eval (or the very similar Function constructor). Some of the answers to this question suggest this. Some other answers suggest using global variables as a workaround. Each of those solutions have their own caveats, though.
Other than that, your only option is to use a different syntax. The closest you can get to your original syntax is passing a parameter from doSomething to the callback, as Aadit M Shah suggested. Yes, I am aware you said you don't want to do that, but it's either that or an ugly hack...
Original answer (written when I didn't fully understand the question)
Maybe what you're looking for is a closure? Something like this:
var myVariable = "value";
function doSomething() {
console.log(myVariable);
};
doSomething(); // logs "value"
Or maybe this?
function createClosure(myVariable) {
return function() {
console.log(myVariable);
};
}
var closure = createClosure("value");
closure(); // logs "value"
Or even:
var closure = function(myVariable) {
return function() {
console.log(myVariable);
};
}("value");
closure(); // logs "value"
I asked a similar question a long time ago: Is it possible to achieve dynamic scoping in JavaScript without resorting to eval?
The short answer is no, you can't achieve dynamic scoping without resorting to eval. The long answer is, you don't need to.
JavaScript doesn't support dynamic scoping, but that's not an issue because you can make your free variables parameters of the function that they belong to.
In my humble opinion this is the best solution:
function doSomething(context, callback) {
callback(context);
}
doSomething({myVariable: "value"}, function(M) {
console.log(M.myVariable);
});
However since you don't want to write a formal parameter, the next best thing is to use this instead:
function doSomething(context, callback) {
callback.call(context);
}
doSomething({myVariable: "value"}, function() {
console.log(this.myVariable);
});
Another option would be to manipulate the formal parameter list of the program as follows:
function inject(func, properties) {
var args = [], params = [];
for (var property in properties) {
if (properties.hasOwnProperty(property)) {
args.push(properties[property]);
params.push(property);
}
}
return Function.apply(null, params.concat("return " + func.toString()))
.apply(null, args);
}
Now we can use this inject method to inject properties into a function as follows:
function doSomething(context, callback) {
var func = inject(callback, context);
func();
}
doSomething({myVariable: "value"}, function() {
console.log(myVariable);
});
See the demo: http://jsfiddle.net/sDKga/1/
Note: The inject function will create an entirely new function which will not have the same lexical scope as the original function. Hence functions with free variables and partially applied functions will not work as expected. Only use inject with normal functions.
The Function constructor is kind of like eval but it's much safer. Of course I would advise you to simply use a formal parameter or this instead. However the design decision is your choice.
Try:
function doSomething(vars, fun) {
for (var key in vars) { // set the variables in vars
window[key] = vars[key];
}
fun.call(); // call function
for (var key in vars) { // remove the variables again. this will allow only the function to use it
delete window[key];
}
}
Set global variables that can then be received inside of fun
The JSFiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/shawn31313/MbAMQ/
Warning: disgusting code ahead
function callWithContext(func, context, args) {
var oldProperties = {};
for(var n in context) {
if(context.hasOwnProperty(n)) {
var oldProperty = Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptor(self, n);
oldProperties[n] = oldProperty;
(function(n) {
Object.defineProperty(self, n, {
get: function() {
if(arguments.callee.caller === func) {
return context[n];
}
if(!oldProperty) {
return;
}
if(oldProperty.get) {
return oldProperty.get.apply(this, arguments);
}
return oldProperty.value;
},
set: function(value) {
if(arguments.callee.caller === func) {
context[n] = value;
}
if(!oldProperty) {
return;
}
if(oldProperty.set) {
return oldProperty.get.apply(this, arguments);
} else if(!oldProperty.writable) {
var fakeObject = {};
Object.defineProperty(fakeObject, n, {value: null, writable: false});
fakeObject[n] = value; // Kind of stupid, but…
return;
}
oldProperty.value = value;
}
});
})(n);
}
}
func.apply(this, args);
for(var n in context) {
if(context.hasOwnProperty(n)) {
if(oldProperties[n]) {
Object.defineProperty(self, n, oldProperties[n]);
} else {
delete self[n];
}
}
}
}
This is vomitously horrendous, by the way; don’t use it. But ew, it actually works.
i don't see why you can't just pass the info in or define a single global, but i think that would be best.
that said, i am working on a Module maker/runner that allows sloppy/dangerous code to execute without interference to the host environment. that provides the opportunity to re-define variables, which can be passed as an object.
this does use eval (Function() technically) but it can run in "use strict", so it's not too crazy/clever.
it doesn't leave behind artifacts.
it also won't let globals get hurt.
it's still a work in progress, and i need to iron out a couple minor details before i vouch for security, so don't use it for fort knox or anything, but it's working and stable enough to perform the operation asked for.
tested in ch28, FF22, IE10:
function Module(strCode, blnPreventExtensions, objWhitelist, objExtend) {
var __proto__=self.__proto__, pbu=self.__proto__, str=strCode, om=[].map, wasFN=false,
params = {Object:1}, fnScrubber, natives= [ Object, Array, RegExp, String, Boolean, Date] ,
nativeSlots = [],
preamble = "'use strict';" ,
inherited="__defineGetter__,__defineSetter__,__proto__,valueOf,constructor,__lookupGetter__,__lookupSetter__",
late = inherited +
Object.getOwnPropertyNames(__proto__||{}) + Object.getOwnPropertyNames(window);
late.split(",").sort().map(function(a) {
this[a] = 1;
}, params);
preamble+=";var "+inherited+";";
//turn functions into strings, but note that a function was passed
if(str.call){wasFN=true; str=String(str); delete params.Object; }
objExtend=objExtend||{};
var vals=Object.keys(objExtend).map(function(k){ return objExtend[k]; })
// build a usable clone of Object for all the new OOP methods it provides:
var fakeOb=Object.bind();
(Object.getOwnPropertyNames(Object)||Object.keys(Object)).map(function(a){
if(Object[a] && Object[a].bind){this[a]=Object[a].bind(Object); } return this;
},fakeOb)[0];
//allow "eval" and "arguments" since strict throws if you formalize them and eval is now presumed safe.
delete params.eval;
delete params.arguments;
params.hasOwnProperty=undefined;
params.toString=undefined;
params['__proto__']={};
__proto__=null;
Object.keys(objWhitelist||{}).map(function ripper(a,b){
b=this[a];
if(typeof b!=='object'){
delete this[a];
}
}, params);
// var ok=Object.keys.bind(Object);
// prevent new prototype methods from being added to native constructors:
if (blnPreventExtensions) {
natives.forEach(function(con, i) {
var proto=con.prototype;
Object.getOwnPropertyNames(proto).map(function(prop){
if(proto[prop] && proto[prop].bind ){ this[prop]=proto[prop];}
}, nativeSlots[i] = {});
delete con.constructor;
delete con.prototype.constructor;
}); //end con map()
} /* end if(blnPreventExtensions) */
//white-list harmless math utils and prevent hijacking:
delete params.Math;
if(blnPreventExtensions){Object.freeze(Math);}
//prevent literal constructors from getting Function ref (eg: [].constructor.constructor, /./.constructor.constructor, etc...):
Function.prototype.constructor = null;
try {
//generate a private wrapper function to evaluate code:
var response = Function(
Object.keys(objExtend) + (vals.length?",":"") +
Object.keys(params).filter(/./.test, /^[\w\$]+$/), // localize most globals
preamble + " return " + str.trim() // cram code into a function body with global-blocking formal parameters
);
// call it with a blank this object and only user-supplied arguments:
if (blnPreventExtensions) { //( user-land code must run inside here to be secure)
response = response.apply({}, vals.concat(fakeOb)).apply({}, [].slice.call(arguments,4) );
}else{
response = response.apply({}, vals.concat(fakeOb));
}
} catch (y) {
response = y + "!!";
} /* end try/catch */
if (blnPreventExtensions) {
om.call(natives, function(con, i) {
var pro=con.prototype;
//remove all proto methods for this con to censor any additions made by unsafe code:
Object.getOwnPropertyNames(pro).map(function(a){ try{delete pro[a];}catch(y){}});
//restore all original props from the backup:
var bu = nativeSlots[i];
om.call(Object.keys(bu), function(prop){ con.prototype[prop]=bu[prop]; }, bu);
}); //end con map()
} /* end if(blnPreventExtensions) */
//restore hidden Function constructor property:
Function.prototype.constructor = Function;
return response;
} /* end Module() */
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
function doSomething(context, fn){
console.log(myVariable);
return myVariable;
}
//use 1:
alert( Module(doSomething, true, {console:1}, {myVariable: "value123"} ) );// immed
//use2:
var fn=Module(doSomething, false, {console:1}, {myVariable: "value123"} );// as function
alert(fn);
alert(fn());
again, i think OP would be best off not doing things later than need be, but for the sake of comprehensiveness and inspiration i'm putting this out there in good faith.
You need to use call() to construct a context, as in:
var f=function(){
console.log(this.foo);
};
f.call({foo:'bar'})
will print "bar"
You can avoid using eval() in calling the function, if you are willing to use it in doSomething():
function abc() {
console.log(myVariable);
}
// Prints "value"
callWith({ myVariable: "value" }, abc);
function callWith(context, func) {
for(var i in context) eval('var ' + i + ' = context[i];');
eval('(' + func.toString() + ')')();
}
Have a look at this post.
Have a look at goog.partial, scroll a little bit up to see the description of what it does:
Here is an implementation of it:
var b = goog.partial(alert, 'Hello world!');
b();//alerts "Hello world!"
In the example it passes the function alert with parameter "Hello world!" but you can pass it your own function with multiple parameters.
This allows you to create a variable that points to a function that is always called with a certain paramater. To use parameters in a function that are not named you can use arguments:
function test(){
console.log(arguments);//["hello","world"]
}
test("hello","world");

How to create a javascript library using a closure

I have written some javascript that I would to encapsulate in a closure so I can use it elsewhere. I would like do do this similar to the way jQuery has done it. I would like to be able to pass in an id to my closure and invoke some functions on it, while setting some options. Similar to this:
<script type="text/javascript">
_snr("#canvas").draw({
imageSrc : someImage.png
});
</script>
I have read a lot of different posts on how to use a closure to do this but am still struggling with the concept. Here is where I left off:
_snr = {};
(function (_snr) {
function merge(root){
for ( var i = 1; i < arguments.length; i++ )
for ( var key in arguments[i] )
root[key] = arguments[i][key];
return root;
}
_snr.draw = function (options) {
var defaults = {
canvasId : 'canvas',
imageSrc : 'images/someimage.png'
}
var options = merge(defaults, options)
return this.each(function() {
//More functions here
});
};
_snr.erase = function () {};
})(_snr);
When ever I try to call the draw function like the first code section above, I get the following error, '_snr is not a function'. Where am I going wrong here?
EDIT
Here is what I ended up doing:
function _snr(id) {
// About object is returned if there is no 'id' parameter
var about = {
Version: 0.2,
Author: "ferics2",
Created: "Summer 2011",
Updated: "3 September 2012"
};
if (id) {
if (window === this) {
return new _snr(id);
}
this.e = document.getElementById(id);
return this;
} else {
// No 'id' parameter was given, return the 'about' object
return about;
}
};
_snr.prototype = (function(){
var merge = function(root) {
for ( var i = 1; i < arguments.length; i++) {
for ( var key in arguments[i] ) {
root[key] = arguments[i][key];
}
}
return root;
};
return {
draw: function(options) {
var defaults = {
canvasId : 'canvas',
imageSrc : 'images/someimage.png'
};
options = merge(defaults, options);
return this;
},
erase: function() {
return this;
}
};
})();
I can now call:
<script type="text/javascript">
_snr("#canvas").draw({
imageSrc : someImage.png
});
</script>
Because you declared _snr as an object and not a function. Functions can have properties and methods, so there's various ways to achieve what you want, for example one of them would be say...
_snr = function(tag) {
this.tag = tag;
}
_snr.foo = function() {
//Code goes here
}
You can also pass the outer context into a closure to hide your variables from accidentally polluting the global namespace, so like...
(function(global) {
var _snr = function(tag) {
this.tag = tag;
}
_snr.foo = function() {
//Code goes here
}
//export the function to the window context:
global._snr = _snr;
})(window);
window._snr('#tag').foo('wat');
Happy coding.
Because your _snr is an object, not a function. You have to call it like this:
_snr.draw({
canvasId: '#canvas',
imageSrc: 'someImage.png'
});
When you do _snr('#canvas') that is a function call which is why you're getting that error. _snr is an object with some methods attached to it such as draw() and erase(). The reason jQuery is able to pass arguments into the $ is because they return the $ as a function object which is why we're able to pass it various selectors as arguments.
You are going wrong at the first line _snr = {}
It needs to be
_snr = function(){
selector = arguments[0]||false;
//snr init on dom object code
return _snrChild;
}
Im on a mobile phone but when im on a pc I will maybe fix the whole code c:
Here you have a snr object and that has erase and draw methods. What you intend to do is to write a _snr function which will get an id and return a wrapper object. That returned object should have erase and draw methods. so you can do
var returnedObject = _snr("my_id");
returnedObject.draw("image.png");

Is there a Javascript equivalent of Ruby's andand?

In trying to make my Javascript unobtrusive, I'm using onLoads to add functionality to <input>s and such. With Dojo, this looks something like:
var coolInput = dojo.byId('cool_input');
if(coolInput) {
dojo.addOnLoad(function() {
coolInput.onkeyup = function() { ... };
});
}
Or, approximately equivalently:
dojo.addOnLoad(function() {
dojo.forEach(dojo.query('#cool_input'), function(elt) {
elt.onkeyup = function() { ... };
});
});
Has anyone written an implementation of Ruby's andand so that I could do the following?
dojo.addOnLoad(function() {
// the input's onkeyup is set iff the input exists
dojo.byId('cool_input').andand().onkeyup = function() { ... };
});
or
dojo.byId('cool_input').andand(function(elt) {
// this function gets called with elt = the input iff it exists
dojo.addOnLoad(function() {
elt.onkeyup = function() { ... };
});
});
I don't know Dojo, but shouldn't your first example read
dojo.addOnLoad(function() {
var coolInput = dojo.byId('cool_input');
if(coolInput)
coolInput.onkeyup = function() { ... };
});
Otherwise, you might end up trying to access the element before the DOM has been built.
Back to your question: In JavaScript, I'd implement andand() as
function andand(obj, func, args) {
return obj && func.apply(obj, args || []);
}
Your example could then be written as
dojo.addOnLoad(function() {
andand(dojo.byId('cool_input'), function() {
this.onkeyup = function() { ... };
});
});
which isn't really that much shorter than using the explicit if statement - so why bother?
The exact syntax you want is not possible in JavaScript. The way JavaScript executes would need to change in a pretty fundamental fashion. For example:
var name = getUserById(id).andand().name;
// ^
// |-------------------------------
// if getUserById returns null, execution MUST stop here |
// otherwise, you'll get a "null is not an object" exception
However, JavaScript doesn't work that way. It simply doesn't.
The following line performs almost exactly what you want.
var name = (var user = getUserById(id)) ? user.name : null;
But readability won't scale to larger examples. For example:
// this is what you want to see
var initial = getUserById(id).andand().name.andand()[0];
// this is the best that JavaScript can do
var initial = (var name = (var user = getUserById(id)) ? user.name : null) ? name[0] : null;
And there is the side-effect of those unnecessary variables. I use those variables to avoid the double lookup. The variables are mucking up the context, and if that's a huge deal, you can use anonymous functions:
var name = (function() {return (var user = getUserById(id)) ? user.name : null;})();
Now, the user variable is cleaned-up properly, and everybody's happy. But wow! what a lot of typing! :)
You want dojo.behavior.
dojo.behavior.add({
'#cool_input': {
onKeyUp: function(evt) { ... }
}
});
How about something like this:
function andand(elt, f) {
if (elt)
return f(elt);
return null;
}
Call like this:
andand(dojo.byId('cool_input'), function(elt) {
// this function gets called with elt = the input iff it exists
dojo.addOnLoad(function() {
elt.onkeyup = function() { ... };
});
});
As far as I know there isn't a built-in JavaScript function that has that same functionality. I think the best solution though is to query by class instead of id and use dojo.forEach(...) as you will be guaranteed a non-null element in the forEach closure.
You could always use the JavaScript equivalent:
dojo.byId('cool_input') && dojo.byId('cool_input').whateverYouWantToDo(...);
I've never used dojo, but most javascript frameworks (when dealing with the DOM) return the calling element when a method is called from the element object (poor wording, sorry). So andand() would be implicit.
dojo.addOnLoad(function() {
dojo.byId('cool_input').onkeyup(function(evt) { /*event handler code*/
});
});
For a list:
Array.prototype.andand = function(property, fn) {
if (this.filter(property).length > 0) this.map(fn);
}

Can event handler defined within JavaScript object literal access itself?

I know I could do this with closures (var self = this) if object was a function:
click here
<script type="text/javascript">
var object = {
y : 1,
handle_click : function (e) {
alert('handling click');
//want to access y here
return false;
},
load : function () {
document.getElementById('x').onclick = this.handle_click;
}
};
object.load();
</script>
The simplest way to bind the call to handle_click to the object it is defined in would be something like this:
var self=this;
document.getElementById('x').onclick =
function(e) { return self.handle_click(e) };
If you need to pass in parameters or want to make the code look cleaner (for instance, if you're setting up a lot of similar event handlers), you could use a currying technique to achieve the same:
bind : function(fn)
{
var self = this;
// copy arguments into local array
var args = Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments, 0);
// returned function replaces first argument with event arg,
// calls fn with composite arguments
return function(e) { args[0] = e; return fn.apply(self, args); };
},
...
document.getElementById('x').onclick = this.bind(this.handle_click,
"this parameter is passed to handle_click()",
"as is this one");
So, the event handler part wires up just fine (I tested it myself) but, as your comment indicates, you have no access to the "y" property of the object you just defined.
This works:
var object = {
y : 1,
handle_click : function (e) {
alert('handling click');
//want to access y here
alert(this.y);
return false;
},
load : function () {
var that = this;
document.getElementById('x').onclick = function(e) {
that.handle_click(e); // pass-through the event object
};
}
};
object.load();
There are other ways of doing this too, but this works.
I see how to do it with Jason's latest one. Any way to do it without the anonymous function?
We can directly pass an object with a handler method thanks to AddEventListener, and you will have access to its attributes:
http://www.thecssninja.com/javascript/handleevent
Hope this will help those who, like me, will look for this topic some years after!

Categories