I need some help please with a javascript object. it goes like this:
I call this function addFilter(element) with a html DOM element.
The function looks like this:
function MyList() {
this.arr = new Array();
this.index = 0;
}
MyList.prototype.add = function(filter) {
this.arr[this.index++] = filter;
//alert(this.arr[0] + ' mylist arr');
}
function Filter(element) {
this.setElement(element);
}
Filter.prototype.setElement = function (element) {
this.element = element;
this.kinorid = $(element).attr('id');
}
function addFilter(element) {
filters.Add(new Filter(element));
}
var filters = new MyList();
Now with in another function that in my case the function creates the jquery UI Slider, and every time the slider changes i need to get the parent element of that element that was sent to addFilter like i said in the beginning. so then i try doing
var value = filters.arr[0];
but like i said it id undefined.
Can any one please help me by reviewing the code, and tell me whats wrong.
Thank you very much.
You still haven't said where or how you're using filters.arr[0], without which it's very difficult to help you.
Assuming your code using it looks something like this:
AddFilter($("#theElement"));
display(typeof filters.arr[0]);
filters.arr[0].element.css("color", "blue");
It should be working; live example.
My only thought is if AddFilter and filters are not defined within the same scope. You're using filters within AddFilter, so AddFilter must be defined in the same scope as filters (or in a sub-scope). So this would be fine:
var filters;
function AddFilter() { ... }
And this
function AddFilter() { ... }
var filters;
And this
var filters;
$(function() {
function AddFilter() { ... }
});
But not
function AddFilter() { ... }
$(function() {
var filters;
// ...
});
...because in that last case, AddFilter is defined outside the scope in which filters is defined.
Your code is very convoluted, I don't understand it at all. Anyway, you are looking for (I think):
var value = filters.arr[0].element;
since you assign the element reference to arr[this.index].
Incidentally, if you are passing an element, then:
$(this).attr('id');
is an awfully slow way to do:
this.id;
Edit
The code I used (where there was a div with id 'd0' in the DOM):
var filters = new MyList();
AddFilter(document.getElementById('d0'));
alert(filters.arr[0].element);
Related
I'm trying to make a function that works like this:
JavaScript:
let elm = document.querySelector('section')
elm.gridify();
assuming the function gridify adds display: grid; to the element.
My question is: is that possible and, if so, how?
I tried this, and it's actually working:
function gridify() {
this.gridify = function(element) {
let myElement = document.querySelector(element)
myElement.setAttribute('style', 'display: grid;')
console.log(myElement);
}
}
var test = new gridify();
test.gridify('section');
Now, what I want is to make something like what I wrote above.
First of all you have to know that edit prototype is something you should never use, but this is the only way to add a custom method to HTMLElement objects (in your case) :
HTMLElement.prototype.gridify = function() { this.style.display = "grid" };
let div = document.querySelector('#myDiv');
div.gridify();
console.log(div.style.display);
// Output
// grid
As suggested in the comments use a function gridify which takes your HTMLElementas parameter is a better practice ;)
function gridify(element) {
element.style.display = "grid";
}
gridify(div);
console.log(div.style.display);
// Output
// grid
I see some javascript and try to implement the function seperated to reuse it.
This is the old code:
var ListRenderRenderWrapper = function(itemRenderResult, inCtx, tpl)
{
var iStr = [];
iStr.push('<li>');
iStr.push(itemRenderResult);
iStr.push('</li>');
return iStr.join('');
}
And I would like to make something like this:
function wrapItems(itemRenderResult, inCtx, tpl)
{
var iStr = [];
iStr.push('<li>');
iStr.push(itemRenderResult);
iStr.push('</li>');
return iStr.join('');
}
var ListRenderRenderWrapper = wrapItems(itemRenderResult, inCtx, tpl);
is this ok or do I need to do it in another way?
If you just want to assign that function to a new variable so you can call it with a different name, simply do:
var ListRenderRenderWrapper = wrapItems;
The confusion may be coming from the fact that in JavaScript a function can be stored inside a variable and called as a function later.
This means that:
function thing() { /* code */ }
is the same as:
var thing = function() { /* code */ }
(Aside: I know there are subtle differences with hoisting etc, but for the purposes of this example they are the same).
Is it possible to change the state of a toggle function? Like:
myDiv.toggle ... function 1 , function 2
I click on the myDiv element, the function 1 executes
I click again, function 2
I click again, function 1
BUT
Change the state
function 1 again
etc.
But I need to be able to change the state from outside the toggle function.
Here is a javascript object that uses closure to track it's state and toggle:
var TOGGLER = function() {
var _state = true;
var _msg = "function1";
var function1 = function() {
_msg = "function1";
}
var function2 = function() {
_msg = "function2";
}
return {
toggle: (function () {
_state = !_state;
if (_state) {
function1();
} else {
function2();
}
return _msg;
})
}
}();
Here is a jsfiddle that shows how to use it to toggle based with the following jquery: http://jsfiddle.net/yjPKH/5/
$(document).ready(function() {
$("#search").click(function() {
var message = TOGGLER.toggle();
$("#state").text(message);
});
});
The toggle function is meant for simple use cases. Changing the state externally is not "simple" anymore.
You cannot easily/safely (it's internal so it may change during minor versions) access the state variable of the toggle function easily as it's stored in the internal dataset of the element.
If you really want to do it, you can try this code though:
$._data(ELEMENT, "lastToggle" + func.guid, 0);
func is the function you passed to .toggle(), so you need to save this function in a variable. Here's a minimal example: http://jsfiddle.net/xqgrP/
However, since inside the function there's a var guid = fn.guid || jQuery.guid++ statement, I somehow think that the devs actually meant to use guid instead of func.guid for the _data key - in that case a minor update is very likely to break things. And after the fix you'd have to iterate over the data set to retrieve the correct key as there is no way to access the guid from outside.
I seem to have an issue when creating copies of a template and tying the .click() method to them properly. Take the following javascript for example:
function TestMethod() {
var test = Array();
test[0] = 0;
test[1] = 1;
test[2] = 2;
// Insert link into the page
$("#test_div").html("<br>");
var list;
for (x = 0; x < test.length; x++) {
var temp = $("#test_div").clone();
temp.find('a').html("Item #" + test[x]);
temp.click(function () { alert(x); });
if (list == undefined)
list = temp;
else
list = list.append(temp.contents());
}
$("#test_div2").append(list);
}
The problem I am seeing with this is that no matter which item the user clicks on, it always runs alert(2), even when you click on the first few items.
How can I get this to work?
Edit: I have made a very simple example that should show the problem much clearer. No matter what item you click on, it always shows an alert box with the number 2 on it.
Correct me if I'm wrong, .valueOf() in JS returns the primitive value of a Boolean object.....
this would not happen ShowObject(5,'T');... ShowObject(objectVal.valueOf(), 'T');
why not use objects[x].Value directly? ShowObject(objects[x].Value, 'T');
WOOOOOSSSHHHH!
after searching deeply... I found a solution...
because it's a closure, it won't really work that way...
here's a solution,
temp.find('a').bind('click', {testVal: x},function (e) {
alert(e.data.testVal);
return false;
});
for best explanation, please read this... in the middle part of the page where it says Passing Event Data a quick demo of above code
I think your issue arises from a misunderstanding of scopes in JavaScript. (My apologies if I'm wrong.)
function () {
for (...) {
var foo = ...;
$('<div>').click(function () { alert(foo); }).appendTo(...);
}
}
In JavaScript, only functions create a new scope (commonly referred to as a closure).
So, every round of the for loop will know the same foo, since its scope is the function, not the for. This also applies to the events being defined. By the end of looping, every click will know the same foo and know it to be the last value it was assigned.
To get around this, either create an inner closure with an immediately-executing, anonymous function:
function () {
for (...) {
(function (foo) {
$('<div>').click(function () { alert(foo); }).appendTo(...);
})(...);
}
}
Or, using a callback-based function, such as jQuery.each:
function () {
$.each(..., function (i, foo) {
$('<div>').click(function () { alert(foo); }).appendTo(...);
});
}
For your issue, I'd go with the latter (note the changes of objects[x] to just object):
var list;
jQuery.each(data.objects, function (x, object) {
// Clone the object list item template
var item = $("#object_item_list_template").clone();
// Setup the click action and inner text for the link tag in the template
var objectVal = object.Value;
item.find('a').click(function () { ShowObject(objectVal.valueOf(), 'T'); }).html(object.Text);
// add the html to the list
if (list == undefined)
list = item;
else
list.append(item.contents());
});
I edited the question so it would make more sense.
I have a function that needs a couple arguments - let's call it fc(). I am passing that function as an argument through other functions (lets call them fa() and fb()). Each of the functions that fc() passes through add an argument to fc(). How do I pass fc() to each function without having to pass fc()'s arguments separately? Below is how I want it to work.
function fa(fc){
fc.myvar=something
fb(fc)
}
function fb(fc){
fc.myothervar=something
fc()
}
function fc(){
doessomething with myvar and myothervar
}
Below is how I do it now. As I add arguments, it's getting confusing because I have to add them to preceding function(s) as well. fb() and fc() get used elsewhere and I am loosing some flexibility.
function fa(fc){
myvar=something
fb(fc,myvar)
}
function fb(fc,myvar){
myothervar=something
fc(myvar,myothervar)
}
function fc(myvar,myothervar){
doessomething with myvar and myothervar
}
Thanks for your help
Edit 3 - The code
I updated my code using JimmyP's solution. I'd be interested in Jason Bunting's non-hack solution. Remember that each of these functions are also called from other functions and events.
From the HTML page
<input type="text" class="right" dynamicSelect="../selectLists/otherchargetype.aspx,null,calcSalesTax"/>
Set event handlers when section is loaded
function setDynamicSelectElements(oSet) {
/**************************************************************************************
* Sets the event handlers for inputs with dynamic selects
**************************************************************************************/
if (oSet.dynamicSelect) {
var ySelectArgs = oSet.dynamicSelect.split(',');
with (oSet) {
onkeyup = function() { findListItem(this); };
onclick = function() { selectList(ySelectArgs[0], ySelectArgs[1], ySelectArgs[2]) }
}
}
}
onclick event builds list
function selectList(sListName, sQuery, fnFollowing) {
/**************************************************************************************
* Build a dynamic select list and set each of the events for the table elements
**************************************************************************************/
if (fnFollowing) {
fnFollowing = eval(fnFollowing)//sent text function name, eval to a function
configureSelectList.clickEvent = fnFollowing
}
var oDiv = setDiv(sListName, sQuery, 'dynamicSelect', configureSelectList); //create the div in the right place
var oSelected = event.srcElement;
if (oSelected.value) findListItem(oSelected)//highlight the selected item
}
Create the list
function setDiv(sPageName, sQuery, sClassName, fnBeforeAppend) {
/**************************************************************************************
* Creates a div and places a page in it.
**************************************************************************************/
var oSelected = event.srcElement;
var sCursor = oSelected.style.cursor; //remember this for later
var coords = getElementCoords(oSelected);
var iBorder = makeNumeric(getStyle(oSelected, 'border-width'))
var oParent = oSelected.parentNode
if (!oParent.id) oParent.id = sAutoGenIdPrefix + randomNumber()//create an ID
var oDiv = document.getElementById(oParent.id + sWindowIdSuffix)//see if the div already exists
if (!oDiv) {//if not create it and set an id we can use to find it later
oDiv = document.createElement('DIV')
oDiv.id = oParent.id + sWindowIdSuffix//give the child an id so we can reference it later
oSelected.style.cursor = 'wait'//until the thing is loaded
oDiv.className = sClassName
oDiv.style.pixelLeft = coords.x + (iBorder * 2)
oDiv.style.pixelTop = (coords.y + coords.h + (iBorder * 2))
XmlHttpPage(sPageName, oDiv, sQuery)
if (fnBeforeAppend) {
fnBeforeAppend(oDiv)
}
oParent.appendChild(oDiv)
oSelected.style.cursor = ''//until the thing is loaded//once it's loaded, set the cursor back
oDiv.style.cursor = ''
}
return oDiv;
}
Position and size the list
function configureSelectList(oDiv, fnOnClick) {
/**************************************************************************************
* Build a dynamic select list and set each of the events for the table elements
* Created in one place and moved to another so that sizing based on the cell width can
* occur without being affected by stylesheet cascades
**************************************************************************************/
if(!fnOnClick) fnOnClick=configureSelectList.clickEvent
if (!oDiv) oDiv = configureSelectList.Container;
var oTable = getDecendant('TABLE', oDiv)
document.getElementsByTagName('TABLE')[0].rows[0].cells[0].appendChild(oDiv)//append to the doc so we are style free, then move it later
if (oTable) {
for (iRow = 0; iRow < oTable.rows.length; iRow++) {
var oRow = oTable.rows[iRow]
oRow.onmouseover = function() { highlightSelection(this) };
oRow.onmouseout = function() { highlightSelection(this) };
oRow.style.cursor = 'hand';
oRow.onclick = function() { closeSelectList(0); fnOnClick ? fnOnClick() : null };
oRow.cells[0].style.whiteSpace = 'nowrap'
}
} else {
//show some kind of error
}
oDiv.style.width = (oTable.offsetWidth + 20) + "px"; //no horiz scroll bars please
oTable.mouseout = function() { closeSelectList(500) };
if (oDiv.firstChild.offsetHeight < oDiv.offsetHeight) oDiv.style.height = oDiv.firstChild.offsetHeight//make sure the list is not too big for a few of items
}
Okay, so - where to start? :) Here is the partial function to begin with, you will need this (now and in the future, if you spend a lot of time hacking JavaScript):
function partial(func /*, 0..n args */) {
var args = Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments, 1);
return function() {
var allArguments = args.concat(Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments));
return func.apply(this, allArguments);
};
}
I see a lot of things about your code that make me cringe, but since I don't have time to really critique it, and you didn't ask for it, I will suggest the following if you want to rid yourself of the hack you are currently using, and a few other things:
The setDynamicSelectElements() function
In this function, you can change this line:
onclick = function() { selectList(ySelectArgs[0], ySelectArgs[1], ySelectArgs[2]) }
To this:
onclick = function() { selectList.apply(null, ySelectArgs); }
The selectList() function
In this function, you can get rid of this code where you are using eval - don't ever use eval unless you have a good reason to do so, it is very risky (go read up on it):
if (fnFollowing) {
fnFollowing = eval(fnFollowing)
configureSelectList.clickEvent = fnFollowing
}
And use this instead:
if(fnFollowing) {
fnFollowing = window[fnFollowing]; //this will find the function in the global scope
}
Then, change this line:
var oDiv = setDiv(sListName, sQuery, 'dynamicSelect', configureSelectList);
To this:
var oDiv = setDiv(sListName, sQuery, 'dynamicSelect', partial(configureSelectListAlternate, fnFollowing));
Now, in that code I provided, I have "configureSelectListAlternate" - that is a function that is the same as "configureSelectList" but has the parameters in the reverse order - if you can reverse the order of the parameters to "configureSelectList" instead, do that, otherwise here is my version:
function configureSelectListAlternate(fnOnClick, oDiv) {
configureSelectList(oDiv, fnOnClick);
}
The configureSelectList() function
In this function, you can eliminate this line:
if(!fnOnClick) fnOnClick=configureSelectList.clickEvent
That isn't needed any longer. Now, I see something I don't understand:
if (!oDiv) oDiv = configureSelectList.Container;
I didn't see you hook that Container property on in any of the other code. Unless you need this line, you should be able to get rid of it.
The setDiv() function can stay the same.
Not too exciting, but you get the idea - your code really could use some cleanup - are you avoiding the use of a library like jQuery or MochiKit for a good reason? It would make your life a lot easier...
A function's properties are not available as variables in the local scope. You must access them as properties. So, within 'fc' you could access 'myvar' in one of two ways:
// #1
arguments.callee.myvar;
// #2
fc.myvar;
Either's fine...
Try inheritance - by passing your whatever object as an argument, you gain access to whatever variables inside, like:
function Obj (iString) { // Base object
this.string = iString;
}
var myObj = new Obj ("text");
function InheritedObj (objInstance) { // Object with Obj vars
this.subObj = objInstance;
}
var myInheritedObj = new InheritedObj (myObj);
var myVar = myInheritedObj.subObj.string;
document.write (myVar);
subObj will take the form of myObj, so you can access the variables inside.
Maybe you are looking for Partial Function Application, or possibly currying?
Here is a quote from a blog post on the difference:
Where partial application takes a function and from it builds a function which takes fewer arguments, currying builds functions which take multiple arguments by composition of functions which each take a single argument.
If possible, it would help us help you if you could simplify your example and/or provide actual JS code instead of pseudocode.