I need a hand to sub a variable into a regular expression
this line works fine:
subject = subject.replace(/<a title="Smile"><img.+?<\/a>/g, emoticons[1]);
I need switch the word "Smile" for a variable.
I have tried a few different configurations like:
subject = subject.replace(/<a title="'+emoLanguage[0]+'"><img.+?<\/a>/g, emoticons[1]);
but I can't get the variable to work.
Whats the trick??
First I would say that you probably shouldn't use a regular expression to parse/fix HTML. That being said, this should work:
var re = new RegExp("<a title=\"" + emoLanguage[0] + "\"><img.+?</a>", "g");
subject = subject.replace(re, emoticons[1]);
A better solution would be to use jQuery. The solution is much prettier:
jQuery("a[title='" + emoLanguage[0] + "']").replaceWith(emoticons[1]);
This assumes that the data in emoticons[1] is HTML.
Of course, importing jQuery for just this little thing is probably overkill, but I'm sure that you'll find that it will probably make other things in your Javascript much more easier and elegant.
Use the new Regexp() constructor to create the regular expression, instead of a literal regexp.
Note that you’ll have to properly escape your string, since many characters have special meaning in a regexp.
You have to use the RegExp object cobnstructor in such case:
var pattern = new RegExp('<a title="'+emoLanguage[0]+'"><img.+?</a>',"g");
subject = subject.replace(pattern, emoticons[1]);
Related
I have to explicitly use trim() for too many variables. Is there anyway I can apply trim to all the string values in code without calling trim explicitly?
Note:
I asked this question out of curiosity to find if there is a way or possibility to do so. Even I dont want to apply trim in all the scenarios. But yes I've to use trim for all the literals and variables I use in an app(I've such a req). So wanted to know if there is a common place where I can change instead of missing few places.
No, there's nothing in JavaScript's strings that will globally enable automatic whitespace trimming for you. You'll have to do it when/where required, which should typically be only a few places (e.g., reading from inputs).
Here's a cool hack. would not recommend:
String.prototype.valueOf = function() {
return this.trim();
};
'query' + (new String(' asdf ')); // "queryasdf"
I'm trying to use this great RegEx presented here for grabbing a video id from any youtube type url:
parse youtube video id using preg_match
// getting our youtube url from an input field.
var yt_url = $('#yt_url').val();
var regexp = new RegExp('%(?:youtube(?:-nocookie)?\\.com/(?:[^/]+/.+/|(?:v|e(?:mbed)?)/|.*[?&]v=)|youtu\\.be/)([^"&?/ ]{11})%','i');
var videoId = yt_url.match( regexp ) ;
console.log('vid: '+videoId);
My console is always giving me a null videoId though. Am I incorrectly escaping something in my regexp var? I added the a second backslash to escape the single backslashes already.
Scratching my head?
% are delimiters for the PHP you got the link from, Javascript does not expect delimiters when using new RegExp(). Also, it looks like \\. should probably be replaced with \. Try:
var regexp = new RegExp('(?:youtube(?:-nocookie)?\.com/(?:[^/]+/.+/|(?:v|e(?:mbed)?)/|.*[?&]v=)|youtu\.be/)([^"&?/ ]{11})','i');
Also, you can create a regular expression literally by using Javascript's /.../ delimiters, but then you'll need to escape all of your /s:
var regexp = /(?:youtube(?:-nocookie)?\.com\/(?:[^/]+\/.+\/|(?:v|e(?:mbed)?)\/|.*[?&]v=)|youtu\\.be\/)([^"&?\/ ]{11})/i;
Documentation
Update:
A quick update to address the comment on efficiency for literal expressions (/ab+c/) vs. constructors (new RegExp("ab+c")). The documentation says:
Regular expression literals provide compilation of the regular expression when the script is loaded. When the regular expression will remain constant, use this for better performance.
And:
Using the constructor function provides runtime compilation of the regular expression. Use the constructor function when you know the regular expression pattern will be changing, or you don't know the pattern and are getting it from another source, such as user input.
Since your expression will always be static, I would say creating it literally (the second example) would be slightly faster since it is compiled when loaded (however, don't confuse this into thinking it won't be creating a RegExp object). This small difference is confirmed with a quick benchmark test.
I developed a javascript function to clean a range of Unicode characters. For example, "ñeóñú a1.txt" => "neonu a1.txt". For this, I used a regular expression:
var = new RegExp patternA ("[\\u0300-\\u036F]", "g");
name = name.replace (patternA,'');
But it does not work properly in IE. If my research is correct, IE does not detect Unicode in the same way. I'm trying to make an equivalent function using the library XRegExp (http://xregexp.com/), which is compatible with all browsers, but I don't know how to write the Unicode pattern so XRegExp works in IE.
One of the failed attemps:
XRegExp.replace(name,'\\u0300-\\u036F','');
How can I build this pattern?
The value provided as the XRegExp.replace method's second argument should be a regular expression object, not a string. The regex can be built by the XRegExp or the native RegExp constructor. Thus, the following two lines are equivalent:
name = name.replace(/[\u0300-\u036F]/g, '');
// Is equivalent to:
name = XRegExp.replace(name, /[\u0300-\u036F]/g, '');
The following line you wrote, however, is not valid:
var = new RegExp patternA ("[\\u0300-\\u036F]", "g");
Instead, it should be:
var patternA = new RegExp ("[\\u0300-\\u036F]", "g");
I don't know if that is the source of your problem, but perhaps. For the record, IE's Unicode support is as good or better than other browsers.
XRegExp can let you identify your block by name, rather than using magic numbers. XRegExp('[\\u0300-\\u036F]') and XRegExp('\\p{InCombiningDiacriticalMarks}') are exactly equivalent. However, the marks in that block are a small subset of all combining marks. You might actually want to match something like XRegExp('\\p{M}'). However, note that simply removing marks like you're doing is not a safe way to remove diacritics. Generally, what you're trying to do is a bad idea and should be avoided, since it will often lead to wrong or unintelligible results.
Does anyone know how to find regular expression string from javascript code?
e.g.
var pattern = /some regular expression/;
Is it possible to to with regular expression :) ?
If I got your question right, and you need a regular expression which would find all the regular expressions in a JavaScript program, then I don't think it is possible. A regular expression in JavaScript does not have to use the // syntax, it can be defined as a string. Even a full-blown JavaScript parser would not be smart enough to detect a regular expression here, for instance:
var re = "abcde";
var regexClass = function() { return RegExp; }
var regex = new regexClass()(re);
So I would give up this idea unless you want to cover only a few very basic cases.
You want a regex to match a regex? Crazy. This might cover the simplest cases.
new RegExp("\/.+\/")
However, I peeked into the Javascript Textmate bundle and is has 2 regex for finding a regex start and end.
begin = '(?<=[=(:]|^|return)\s*(/)(?![/*+{}?])'
end = '(/)[igm]*';
Which you could probably use as inspiration for toward your goal.
Thanks for answers I have found also that it is nearly impossible task to do, but here is my regex which parses source code just fine:
this.mainPattern = new RegExp(//single line comment
"(?://.*$)|"+
//multiline comment
"(/\\*.*?($|\\*/))"+
//single or double quote strings
"|(?:(?:\"[^\"\\\\]*(?:\\\\.[^\"\\\\]*)*\")|(?:'[^'\\\\]*(?:\\\\.[^'\\\\]*)*'))"+
//regular expression literal in javascript code
"|(?:(?:[/].+[/])[img]?[\\s]?(?=[;]|[,]|[)]))"+
//brackets
"|([{]|[(]|[\[])|([}]|[)]|[\\]])", 'g');
We can work with escape sequence in strings on JavaScript. For example, I can write \\ and it means \. But I don't want to use a escape sequence.
I know that on C# I can write #"My string" and I don't need to escape anything. Is there similar syntax in JavaScript?
No, there's not. However, there are RegExp literals:
/foo\s+bar/
There is no such syntax, but there is a work around:
var string = (<r><![CDATA[
Now you can put a whole lot of stuff here.
Including new lines, and all sorts of symbols: \ " '
]]></r>).toString();
Because it's so verbose it's only worth using this when you have something that would be otherwise unreadable (eg: a pretty long string with a bunch of characters that need escaping).