I'm sprucing up a library I inherited and came across this little tidbit:
queries = urlParams.query.split("&");
// Split URL Queries
$.each(queries, function (i, val) {
val = val.split("=");
args[val[0]] = val[1]; //Assign query args into args object using their name (ie: test=123) as the key
});
// Loop through arguments
$.each(args, function (i, val) {
// Loop through affiliates to compare url arguments against those of the affiliates
$.each(self.affiliates, function (inc, value) {
if (value.urlTag === i) {
self.setAffiliateCookies(i, val, 1); //Set affiliate cookies
gotAff = true;
return false;
}
});
});
The gist of what's happening above is that it is parsing the querystring and breaking up the elements into key-value pairs. Easy enough.
What happens after that is that it loops over that new array and then tests to see if the value of args exists in the object literal value of self.affiliates.urlTag. If so, it sets a cookie, sets gotAff to true, and then returns false to kill the $.each.
Something about this doesn't seem very efficient to me. I've been playing with a recursive function and I'm not quite there, and I'm not sure if I'm going down the wrong path. I'm not sure that killing the $.each with a return false is the most efficient method either.
Any thoughts? Any tips? This sort of pattern is repeated in multiple places and I'd love to know how better to accomplish it.
If I understand the data structures correctly this might be a little cleaner:
$.each(self.affiliates, function (inc, value) {
if (args.hasOwnProperty(value.urlTag)) {
self.setAffiliateCookies(value.urlTag, args[value.urlTag], 1); //Set affiliate cookies
gotAff = true;
return false;
}
});
I'm pretty sure that no matter what it is an n² operation, because you have to go through each argument, and see if it is present in a list. The best you could do in this case is somehow clarify the code, but I'm not really sure you have the correct functions to do that within jQuery.
As an example, here's how I would do it in MooTools:
// Create array of affiliate URL tags.
var affiliateURLs = self.affiliates.map(function(affiliate) {
return affiliate.urlTag;
});
// Filter args list to those with affiliates.
// This is the n² part.
var matchedArgs = Object.filter(args, function(arg, argURL) {
return affiliateURLs.contains(argURL);
});
// Create cookie for each matched arg.
Object.each(matchedArgs, function(arg, argURL) {
self.setAffiliateCookies(argURL, arg, 1);
});
// Note that gotAff is simply
// (Object.getLength(matchedArgs) > 0)
Related
I've been struggling with this piece for a few days and I can't seem to find what's wrong. I have an array with a few objects:
myMainPostObj.categories = [Object, Object]
This is for add/removing categories to a post. Imagine I'm editing an existing post which is already associated with a couple of categories (as per code above).
I also have an array which has all categories in the db (including the ones which are associated with the post). On my js controller I have the following code:
$scope.addCategory = function (cat) {
for (var i in $scope.post.category_ids) {
if (cat._id === $scope.post.category_ids[i]) {
$scope.post.category_ids.slice(i, 1);
} else if (cat._id !== $scope.post.category_ids[i]) {
$scope.post.category_ids.push(cat._id);
}
}
}
The above function is called every time the user click on a category. The idea is for the above function to loop through the categories within the post (associated with the post) and compares it with the category passed as argument. If it matches the function should remove the category. If it doesn't it should add.
In theory this seems straight forward enough, but for whatever reason if I tick on category that is not associated with the post, it adds two (not one as expected) category to the array. The same happens when I try to remove as well.
This is part of a Angular controller and the whole code can be found here
The error in your code is that for each iteration of the loop you either remove or add a category. This isn't right... You should remove if the current id matches but add only if there was no match at all. Something like this:
$scope.addCategory = function (cat) {
var found = false;
for (var i in $scope.post.category_ids) {
if (cat._id === $scope.post.category_ids[i]) {
$scope.post.category_ids.splice(i, 1); // splice, not slice
found = true;
}
}
if (!found) // add only if it wasn't found
$scope.post.category_ids.push(cat._id);
}
I guess the problem could be that you're altering the category_ids array while you're iterating over it with the for loop. You might be better off trying something like this:
$scope.addCategory = function (cat) {
var catIndex = $scope.post.category_ids.indexOf(cat._id);
if (catIndex > -1)
$scope.post.category_ids.splice(catIndex, 1);
else
$scope.post.category_ids.push(cat._id);
}
Note that indexOf doesn't seem to be supported in IE7-8.
Let's simplify this a bit:
const CATEGORIES = [1, 2, 3];
let addCategory = (postCategories, categoryId) => {
CATEGORIES.forEach((cId, index) => {
if (postCategories[index] === cId) console.log("Removing", categoryId);
else console.log("Adding", categoryId);
});
return postCategories;
};
Please ignore the fact that we actually are not mutating the array being passed in.
A is either equal or not equal to B - there is no third option (FILE_NOT_FOUND aside). So you are looping over all of your categories and every time you don't find the category ID in the array at the current index you add it to the postCategories array.
The proper solution to your problem is just to use a Set (or if you need more than bleeding edge ES6 support, an object with no prototype):
// Nicer, ES6-or-pollyfill option
var postCategories = new Set();
postCategories.add(categoryId);
// Or, in the no-prototype option:
var postCategories = Object.create(null);
postCategories[categoryId] = true;
// Then serialization needs an extra step if you need an array:
parentObject.postCategories = Object.keys(parentObject.postCategories);
function addNumifnotThere(numer){
var numCent = [];
numCent.forEach(function(){
if(numer in numCent)
console.log("you logged that");
else
numCent.push(numer);
});
return numCent;
}
This is my current code, what its attempting to do is read an array and if there is already an element exits the loop and says "you already logged that", obviously if it cannot find a similar element then it pushes it to the array.
I want this to work dynamically so we cannot know the size of the array beforehand, so the first element passed as an argument should be put into the array, (addNum(1) should have the array print out [1], calling addNum(1) again should print "you already logged that")
However there are two problems with this
1) Trying to push to a new array without any entries means everything is undefined and therefore trying to traverse the array just causes the program to print [].
2) Adding some random elements to the array just to make it work, in this case numCent=[1,2,3] has other issues, mainly that adding a number above 3 causes the code to print incorrect information. In this case addNum(5) should print [1,2,3,5] but instead prints [1,2,3,5,5,5]
I know this has to be a simple mistake but I've been dragging myself too long to not ask for help.
EDIT: Thanks to the many outstanding answers here I have now leanred about the indexOf method, thank you guys so much.
For every non-match you are pushing the number. Use something like this
var numCent = [];
function addNumifnotThere(numer)
{
var index = numCent.indexOf(number);
if(index >=0)
{
console.log("you logged that");
}
else
{
numCent.push(number);
}
return numCent;
}
Use Array.prototype.indexOf
var numCent = [];
function addNum(numer){
if (numCent.indexOf(numer) > -1)
{
console.log("Number already in array");
}
else
{
numCent.push(numer);
}
}
//DEMO CODE, not part of solution
document.querySelector("button").addEventListener("click", function(){
if (document.querySelector("input").value.length > 0)
{
addNum(document.querySelector("input").value);
document.querySelector("div").innerHTML = numCent.join(", ");
}
}, false);
Output
<div id="output"></div>
<input />
<button>Add number</button>
indexOf tests if an element is inside the array and returns its index. If not found it will return -1. You can test for this. You can try it for your self in this snippet. It will only allow you to add a number (or any string, in this example) once.
I also was confused by the newCent array declaration inside the function. I think, based upon the content of your question, you meant this.
If you want the array held in the instance, you can do it like this.
function AddIf(arr){
if( arr || !this.arr ) {
this.arr = arr || [];
}
return function(number) {
if( this.arr.indexOf(number) >= 0 ) {
console.log("Already Present!");
} else {
this.arr.push(number);
}
return this.arr;
}.bind(this);
}
// Usage would be like this:
// var addIf = new AddIf([1, 2, 3]);
// addIf(10); // returns [1, 2, 3, 10]
// addIf(10); // logs "Already Present!", doesn't add 10 to array
This basically returns a function, with this bound to the function being called. If you pass in an initial array, it will use that array to compare to when adding it to the array.
You can catch the return function and call it as you would want to. If you don't call new when invoking however, it will share the same array instance (and have a funky way of being called, AddIf()(10)).
I used fn.bind() to ensure the function gets called in the correct context every time, if you were wondering why I called it like that.
Do do this cleanly, I'd consider prototyping the global Array object and adding a method to push values but only if they're unique to the array. Something like this:
Array.prototype.pushUnique = function (item) {
if (this.indexOf(item) != -1) {
console.log("Item with value of " + item + " already exists in the array."
}
else {
this.push(item);
}
}
If you're not comfortable prototypeing global types like Array, you can build the same thing in a procedural pattern:
function arrayPushUnique (arr, item) {
if (arr.indexOf(item) != -1) {
console.log("Item with value of " + item + " already exists in the array."
}
else {
arr.push(item);
}
}
Then to use it, simply create a new empty array and start pushing things to it.
var numCent = [];
// The Array.prototype method
numCent.pushUnique(number);
// The procedural method
arrayPushUnique(numCent, number);
I know I could use the loop-every-single-list-item approach to filter out unique elements in a given list, but I feel like there's probably a neat, quick way to do it.
How can I find unique list items in JavaScript, without looping through and filtering them manually?
Lately I was working on event handling patch and needed fast method for filtering out unique function handlers in a callback lists which got to be run quite frequently.
Here's what I'm trying to do:
Array.prototype.unique = (function () {
// main Array#unique method
var uni = function uni () {
return this.filter(uni.x);
};
// attach a helper for resolving unique elements
// if element is at current position, not before,
// it's unique one, pass `true` flag to .filter()
uni.x = function (node, pos, ls) {
return pos === ls.indexOf(node);
};
// save
return uniq;
})();
Implementation:
// sample list:
// generate ~1K long list of integers:
// get the keys of string object of length 32,
// map every item to key-list itself,
// flatten, shuffle..
var ls =
Array.prototype.concat.apply([],
Object.keys(new String('1'.repeat(32)))).
map(function (node, pos, list) { return list; }).
sort(function () { return Math.random() < Math.random(); });
// run each function 1K times fetching unique values
for (
var
it = -1,
l = 1000,
// record iteration start
tm = Date.now();
++it < l;
ls.unique()
);
No. If you have a list, you will need to look at least once at every single item to determine whether it is unique.
If you need something faster, don't use a list.
Btw, even on a list you can implement a unique-algorithm in less than the O(n²) that you currently have. See Easiest way to find duplicate values in a JavaScript array for some clever approaches.
I was working on event handling patch and needed fast method for filtering out unique function handlers in a callback list which got to be run quite frequently.
Then you don't want to put them in that list in the first place. Don't check the list for duplicates when you run it (which as you say is frequent), but when you insert a new handler.
If you think that using .indexOf to find a handler in the list is still too slow, you can mark every function object that it is already contained in the list. Choose a unique (per list) property name, and put a value on that property of each function that is in the list. You can then check in constant runtime for duplicates.
If you have a unique key, using a dictionary is a good option. However, if you have some logic that needs to be executed to perform your filtering, I'd go with UnderscoreJS. Check out the _.filter method. It's a great library with lots to offer in this area.
http://underscorejs.org/#filter
I don't think there is a way to get unique list of items without iterating through each item. If you're looking for a built-in library function, I don't think there is one in Angular.
It would be simple enough to create one:
function unique(array, fn) {
var hash = [];
var list = [];
for(var i = 0; i < array.length; ++i) {
var key = fn(array[i]);
if (key && !hash[key]) {
list.push(array[i]);
hash[key] = key;
}
}
return list;
}
Usage:
var myList = [ { id:1, name="oranges"},
{ id:2, name="apples" },
{ id:1, name="oranges"},
{ id:3, name="pears" },
{ id:3, name="pears" } ];
var uniqueList = unique(myList, function(item) { return item.id; });
I pass 2 arrays to a function and want to move a specific entry from one array to another. The moveDatum function itself uses underscorejs' methods reject and filter. My Problem is, the original arrays are not changed, as if I was passing the arrays as value and not as reference. The specific entry is correctly moved, but as I said, the effect is only local. What do I have to change, to have the original arrays change as well?
Call the function:
this.moveDatum(sourceArr, targetArr, id)
Function itself:
function moveDatum(srcDS, trgDS, id) {
var ds = _(srcDS).filter(function(el) {
return el.uid === uid;
});
srcDS = _(srcDS).reject(function(el) {
return el.uid === uid;
});
trgDS.push(ds[0]);
return this;
}
Thanks for the help
As mentioned in the comments, you're assigning srcDS to reference a new array returned by .reject(), and thus losing the reference to the array originally passed in from outside the function.
You need to perform your array operations directly on the original array, perhaps something like this:
function moveDatum(srcDS, trgDS, id) {
var ds;
for (var i = srcDS.length - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
if (srcDS[i].uid === id) {
ds = srcDS[i];
srcDS.splice(i,1);
}
}
trgDS.push(ds);
return this;
}
I've set up the loop to go backwards so that you don't have to worry about the loop index i getting out of sync when .splice() removes items from the array. The backwards loop also means ds ends up referencing the first element in srcDS that matches, which is what I assume you intend since your original code had trgDS.push(ds[0]).
If you happen to know that the array will only ever contain exactly one match then of course it doesn't matter if you go forwards or backwards, and you can add a break inside the if since there's no point continuing the loop once you have a match.
(Also I think you had a typo, you were testing === uid instead of === id.)
Copy over every match before deleting it using methods which modify Arrays, e.g. splice.
function moveDatum(srcDS, trgDS, id) { // you pass an `id`, not `uid`?
var i;
for (i = 0; i < srcDS.length; ++i) {
if (srcDS[i].uid === uid) {
trgDS.push(srcDS[i]);
srcDS.splice(i, 1);
// optionally break here for just the first
i--; // remember; decrement `i` because we need to re-check the same
// index now that the length has changed
}
}
return this;
}
This is probably easy for someone.
I am returning a list of campaignIDs (12,45,66) via JSON to a javascript variable
var campaignList = res.DATA.CAMPAIGNS
Now, given a specified campaignID passed in the URL
var campaignId ='<cfoutput>#url.campaignID#</cfoutput>'
I want to check if the returned list contains this campaignID
Any help much appreciated.
Plenty of ways to do it, but I like nice data structures, so ...
Split the list on comma, then loop over list, looking for value:
function campaignExists(campaignList,campaignId) {
aCampaignList = campaignList.split(',');
for (i=0;i<aCampaignList.length;i++) {
if (aCampaignList[i]==campaignId)
return true;
}
return false;
}
Since Array.indexOf sadly isn't cross browser, you're looking at something like:
// assume there is no match
var match_found = false;
// iterate over the campaign list looking for a match,
// set "match_found" to true if we find one
for (var i = 0; i < campaignList.length; i += 1) {
if (parseInt(campaignList[i]) === parseInt(campaignId)) {
match_found = true;
break;
}
}
If you need to do this repeatedly, wrap it in a function
Here's a bit of a "out of the box" solution. You could create a struct for your property id's that you pass into the json searilizer have the key and the value the same. Then you can test the struct for hasOwnProperty. For example:
var campaignIDs = {12 : 12, 45 : 45, 66 : 66};
campaignIDs.hasOwnProperty("12"); //true
campaignIDs.hasOwnProperty("32"); //false
This way if the list is pretty long you wont have to loop through all of the potential properties to find a match. Here's a fiddle to see it in action:
http://jsfiddle.net/bittersweetryan/NeLfk/
I don't like Billy's answer to this, variables within the function have been declared in the global scope and it is somewhat over complicated. If you have a list of ids as a string in your js just search for the id you have from user input.
var patt = new RegExp("(^|,)" + campaignId + "(,|$)");
var foundCampaign = campaignList.search(patt) != -1;