Javascript Split String Without Separator - javascript

Basically, I have a string of unknown numbers (determined by user input + my own math), and I need to split this string into 3 parts.
For example, I may have "1273498". I need to split it at the two characters, and the 3rd and 4th from the RIGHT, like so:
127
34
98
Another example: 1234567890 would need to be:
123456
78
90
Currently, I am accomplishing it this way:
// get first input box value
var depositgold = document.getElementById('v-gold').value;
// set it to 0 if it's empty
if(depositgold == null || depositgold == '')
depositgold = 0;
// second input box value
var depositsilver = document.getElementById('v-silver').value;
if(depositsilver == null || depositsilver == '')
depositsilver = 0;
// third input box value
var depositcopper = document.getElementById('v-copper').value;
if(depositcopper == null || depositcopper == '')
depositcopper = 0;
// combine the 3 input box values (adding dec to make split easier)
var depositnums = depositgold + '.' + depositsilver + depositcopper;
// do some math on our new value, then split it at out dec
var deposit12 = (0.15 * depositnums).toFixed(4).split(".");
// split the last part of the above split into 4 characters
var result12 = deposit12[1].split("", 3);
// keep the first part of out dec split
var deposit12gold = deposit12[0];
// combine the second part split results into paired numbers
var deposit12silver = result12[0] + result12[1];
var deposit12copper = result12[2] + result12[3];
// repeat the above process
var deposit24 = (0.30 * depositnums).toFixed(4).split(".");
var result24 = deposit24[1].split("", 3);
var deposit24gold = deposit24[0];
var deposit24silver = result24[0] + result24[1];
var deposit24copper = result24[2] + result24[3];
var deposit48 = (0.60 * depositnums).toFixed(4).split(".");
var result48 = deposit48[1].split("", 3);
var deposit48gold = deposit48[0];
var deposit48silver = result48[0] + result48[1];
var deposit48copper = result48[2] + result48[3];
I know there must be a much better (and more sane) way of accomplishing the above - I need to do it several more times for this project, and I'm certainly not looking forward to continuing to do it this way.
I am new to JS and programming, so laugh away, just try not to laugh too hard ;)

Try something along these lines:
var str = "123412341";
var matches = str.match(/(.+?)?(.{2})?(.{2})?$/);
// matches[1] = 12341
// matches[2] = 23
// matches[3] = 41
You may want to modify the RegEx depending on your input, currently all groups are optional.

Just use the substring method
var number = 123456789;
var one = number.substring( 0, number.length - 4 );
var two = number.substring( number.length -4, number.length - 2);
var three = number.substring( number.length - 2 );

Use the substr() method for this:
var L = mystring.length
var part1 = mystring.substr(0,L-4);
var part2 = mystring.substr(L-4,2);
var part3 = mystring.substr(L-2,2);

('1234'+'56'+'78').match(/(\d*)(\d\d)(\d\d)/)
["12345678", "1234", "56", "78"]

var number = 1234567890;
number = number.toString();
var a = number.substr(0, number.length - 4),
b = number.substr(-2),
c = number.substr(number.length - 4, 2);
console.log(a, b, c);
jsFiddle.
Output
123456 90 78

here is a function i made:
/**
* #param num A number to split like 382203849238
* #return Returns an array of size 3, where index 0 = 38220384, index 1 = 92, index 2 = 38 based on the example above
*/
function splitNumbers(num) {
var num = (typeof num == 'string' || typeof num == 'String') ? parseInt(num) : num,
rem = num % 10000;
return [Math.floor(num / 10000), Math.floor(rem / 100), rem % 100];
}

// Function to parse code in 3 parts
function parse_code_Split (code)
{
var len = code.length;
var divisor = (len / 3) >> 0; // get whole number
console.log(divisor);
var stringReg = "";
var regexp = ".{1," + divisor + "}";
try{
stringReg = new RegExp(regexp,"g");
}catch(Error){
window.console.log(Error.message);
}
codeSplit = code.match(stringReg);
// window.console.log(" codeSplit[0] " + codeSplit[0]);
// window.console.log(" codeSplit[1] " + codeSplit[1]);
// window.console.log(" codeSplit[2] " + codeSplit[2]);
// window.console.log(" codeSplit[3] " + codeSplit[3]); // remainder
return codeSplit;
}

Related

How to correctly use values from textboxes in html pls help me

I wanted to use values from textboxes but failed so i tried with constant values and now I am getting a NAN error. I am showing my result in a label btw.
function myFunction() {
var translength = 2400
var transSpacing = 150
var transEndOverhang = 75
var transStartOverhang = 75
var longLength = 6000
var LongSpacing = 150
var LongStartOverhang = 75
var LongEndOverhang = 75
if (transSpacing != 0)
document.getElementById('longAmount').value = ((transLength - transStartOverhang - transEndOverhang) / transSpacing) + 1;
document.getElementById('longAmount').innerHTML = document.getElementById('longAmount').value
if (document.getElementById('longAmount').value > 0 && transStartOverhang + ((document.getElementById('longAmount').value - 1) * transSpacing) + transEndOverhang < transLength)
document.getElementById('longAmount').value = longAmount + 1;
document.getElementById('longAmount').innerHTML = document.getElementById('longAmount').value
}
You're mixing innerHTML and value for the same id. If that id is a textbox you should use .value. Also, to convert strings (the text from the textarea) you can use parseInt() or parseFloat().
// Here you're taking a bunch of variables and sets the textareas value
document.getElementById('longAmount').value = ((transLength - transStartOverhang - transEndOverhang) / transSpacing) + 1;
// Makes no sense (textarea doesn't have a innerHTML)
document.getElementById('longAmount').innerHTML = document.getElementById('longAmount').value;
// document.getElementById('longAmount').value is a string here
if (document.getElementById('longAmount').value > 0 && transStartOverhang + ((document.getElementById('longAmount').value - 1) * transSpacing) + transEndOverhang < transLength)
document.getElementById('longAmount').value = longAmount + 1; // longAmount is undefined.
// Again, makes no sense.
document.getElementById('longAmount').innerHTML = document.getElementById('longAmount').value;

Alternative way to padStart [duplicate]

I am in need of a JavaScript function which can take a value and pad it to a given length (I need spaces, but anything would do). I found this, but I have no idea what the heck it is doing and it doesn't seem to work for me.
String.prototype.pad = function(l, s, t) {
return s || (s = " "),
(l -= this.length) > 0 ?
(s = new Array(Math.ceil(l / s.length) + 1).join(s))
.substr(0, t = !t ? l : t == 1 ?
0 :
Math.ceil(l / 2)) + this + s.substr(0, l - t) :
this;
};
var s = "Jonas";
document.write(
'<h2>S = '.bold(), s, "</h2>",
'S.pad(20, "[]", 0) = '.bold(), s.pad(20, "[]", 0), "<br />",
'S.pad(20, "[====]", 1) = '.bold(), s.pad(20, "[====]", 1), "<br />",
'S.pad(20, "~", 2) = '.bold(), s.pad(20, "~", 2)
);
ECMAScript 2017 (ES8) added String.padStart (along with String.padEnd) for just this purpose:
"Jonas".padStart(10); // Default pad string is a space
"42".padStart(6, "0"); // Pad with "0"
"*".padStart(8, "-/|\\"); // produces '-/|\\-/|*'
If not present in the JavaScript host, String.padStart can be added as a polyfill.
Pre ES8
I found this solution here and this is for me much much simpler:
var n = 123
String("00000" + n).slice(-5); // returns 00123
("00000" + n).slice(-5); // returns 00123
(" " + n).slice(-5); // returns " 123" (with two spaces)
And here I made an extension to the string object:
String.prototype.paddingLeft = function (paddingValue) {
return String(paddingValue + this).slice(-paddingValue.length);
};
An example to use it:
function getFormattedTime(date) {
var hours = date.getHours();
var minutes = date.getMinutes();
hours = hours.toString().paddingLeft("00");
minutes = minutes.toString().paddingLeft("00");
return "{0}:{1}".format(hours, minutes);
};
String.prototype.format = function () {
var args = arguments;
return this.replace(/{(\d+)}/g, function (match, number) {
return typeof args[number] != 'undefined' ? args[number] : match;
});
};
This will return a time in the format "15:30".
A faster method
If you are doing this repeatedly, for example to pad values in an array, and performance is a factor, the following approach can give you nearly a 100x advantage in speed (jsPerf) over other solution that are currently discussed on the inter webs. The basic idea is that you are providing the pad function with a fully padded empty string to use as a buffer. The pad function just appends to string to be added to this pre-padded string (one string concat) and then slices or trims the result to the desired length.
function pad(pad, str, padLeft) {
if (typeof str === 'undefined')
return pad;
if (padLeft) {
return (pad + str).slice(-pad.length);
} else {
return (str + pad).substring(0, pad.length);
}
}
For example, to zero pad a number to a length of 10 digits,
pad('0000000000',123,true);
To pad a string with whitespace, so the entire string is 255 characters,
var padding = Array(256).join(' '), // make a string of 255 spaces
pad(padding,123,true);
Performance Test
See the jsPerf test here.
And this is faster than ES6 string.repeat by 2x as well, as shown by the revised JsPerf here
Please note that jsPerf is no longer online
Please note that the jsPerf site that we originally used to benchmark the various methods is no longer online. Unfortunately, this means we can't get to those test results. Sad but true.
String.prototype.padStart() and String.prototype.padEnd() are currently TC39 candidate proposals: see github.com/tc39/proposal-string-pad-start-end (only available in Firefox as of April 2016; a polyfill is available).
http://www.webtoolkit.info/javascript_pad.html
/**
*
* JavaScript string pad
* http://www.webtoolkit.info/
*
**/
var STR_PAD_LEFT = 1;
var STR_PAD_RIGHT = 2;
var STR_PAD_BOTH = 3;
function pad(str, len, pad, dir) {
if (typeof(len) == "undefined") { var len = 0; }
if (typeof(pad) == "undefined") { var pad = ' '; }
if (typeof(dir) == "undefined") { var dir = STR_PAD_RIGHT; }
if (len + 1 >= str.length) {
switch (dir){
case STR_PAD_LEFT:
str = Array(len + 1 - str.length).join(pad) + str;
break;
case STR_PAD_BOTH:
var padlen = len - str.length;
var right = Math.ceil( padlen / 2 );
var left = padlen - right;
str = Array(left+1).join(pad) + str + Array(right+1).join(pad);
break;
default:
str = str + Array(len + 1 - str.length).join(pad);
break;
} // switch
}
return str;
}
It's a lot more readable.
Here's a recursive approach to it.
function pad(width, string, padding) {
return (width <= string.length) ? string : pad(width, padding + string, padding)
}
An example...
pad(5, 'hi', '0')
=> "000hi"
ECMAScript 2017 adds a padStart method to the String prototype. This method will pad a string with spaces to a given length. This method also takes an optional string that will be used instead of spaces for padding.
'abc'.padStart(10); // " abc"
'abc'.padStart(10, "foo"); // "foofoofabc"
'abc'.padStart(6,"123465"); // "123abc"
'abc'.padStart(8, "0"); // "00000abc"
'abc'.padStart(1); // "abc"
A padEnd method was also added that works in the same manner.
For browser compatibility (and a useful polyfill) see this link.
Using the ECMAScript 6 method String#repeat, a pad function is as simple as:
String.prototype.padLeft = function(char, length) {
return char.repeat(Math.max(0, length - this.length)) + this;
}
String#repeat is currently supported in Firefox and Chrome only. for other implementation, one might consider the following simple polyfill:
String.prototype.repeat = String.prototype.repeat || function(n){
return n<=1 ? this : (this + this.repeat(n-1));
}
Using the ECMAScript 6 method String#repeat and Arrow functions, a pad function is as simple as:
var leftPad = (s, c, n) => c.repeat(n - s.length) + s;
leftPad("foo", "0", 5); //returns "00foo"
jsfiddle
edit:
suggestion from the comments:
const leftPad = (s, c, n) => n - s.length > 0 ? c.repeat(n - s.length) + s : s;
this way, it wont throw an error when s.lengthis greater than n
edit2:
suggestion from the comments:
const leftPad = (s, c, n) =>{ s = s.toString(); c = c.toString(); return s.length > n ? s : c.repeat(n - s.length) + s; }
this way, you can use the function for strings and non-strings alike.
The key trick in both those solutions is to create an array instance with a given size (one more than the desired length), and then to immediately call the join() method to make a string. The join() method is passed the padding string (spaces probably). Since the array is empty, the empty cells will be rendered as empty strings during the process of joining the array into one result string, and only the padding will remain. It's a really nice technique.
With ES8, there are two options for padding.
You can check them in the documentation.
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/String/padEnd
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/String/padStart
Taking up Samuel's ideas, upward here. And remember an old SQL script, I tried with this:
a=1234;
'0000'.slice(a.toString().length)+a;
It works in all the cases I could imagine:
a= 1 result 0001
a= 12 result 0012
a= 123 result 0123
a= 1234 result 1234
a= 12345 result 12345
a= '12' result 0012
Pad with default values
I noticed that I mostly need the padLeft for time conversion / number padding.
So I wrote this function:
function padL(a, b, c) { // string/number, length=2, char=0
return (new Array(b || 2).join(c || 0) + a).slice(-b)
}
This simple function supports Number or String as input.
The default pad is two characters.
The default char is 0.
So I can simply write:
padL(1);
// 01
If I add the second argument (pad width):
padL(1, 3);
// 001
The third parameter (pad character)
padL('zzz', 10, 'x');
// xxxxxxxzzz
#BananaAcid: If you pass a undefined value or a 0 length string, you get 0undefined, so:
As suggested
function padL(a, b, c) { // string/number, length=2, char=0
return (new Array((b || 1) + 1).join(c || 0) + (a || '')).slice(-(b || 2))
}
But this can also be achieved in a shorter way.
function padL(a, b, c) { // string/number, length=2, char=0
return (new Array(b || 2).join(c || 0) + (a || c || 0)).slice(-b)
}
It also works with:
padL(0)
padL(NaN)
padL('')
padL(undefined)
padL(false)
And if you want to be able to pad in both ways:
function pad(a, b, c, d) { // string/number, length=2, char=0, 0/false=Left-1/true=Right
return a = (a || c || 0), c = new Array(b || 2).join(c || 0), d ? (a + c).slice(0, b) : (c + a).slice(-b)
}
which can be written in a shorter way without using slice.
function pad(a, b, c, d) {
return a = (a || c || 0) + '', b = new Array((++b || 3) - a.length).join(c || 0), d ? a+b : b+a
}
/*
Usage:
pad(
input // (int or string) or undefined, NaN, false, empty string
// default:0 or PadCharacter
// Optional
,PadLength // (int) default:2
,PadCharacter // (string or int) default:'0'
,PadDirection // (bolean) default:0 (padLeft) - (true or 1) is padRight
)
*/
Now if you try to pad 'averylongword' with 2... that’s not my problem.
I said that I would give you a tip.
Most of the time, if you pad, you do it for the same value N times.
Using any type of function inside a loop slows down the loop!!!
So if you just want to pad left some numbers inside a long list, don't use functions to do this simple thing.
Use something like this:
var arrayOfNumbers = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7],
paddedArray = [],
len = arrayOfNumbers.length;
while(len--) {
paddedArray[len] = ('0000' + arrayOfNumbers[len]).slice(-4);
}
If you don't know how the maximum padding size based on the numbers inside the array.
var arrayOfNumbers = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 49095],
paddedArray = [],
len = arrayOfNumbers.length;
// Search the highest number
var arrayMax = Function.prototype.apply.bind(Math.max, null),
// Get that string length
padSize = (arrayMax(arrayOfNumbers) + '').length,
// Create a Padding string
padStr = new Array(padSize).join(0);
// And after you have all this static values cached start the loop.
while(len--) {
paddedArray[len] = (padStr + arrayOfNumbers[len]).slice(-padSize); // substr(-padSize)
}
console.log(paddedArray);
/*
0: "00001"
1: "00002"
2: "00003"
3: "00004"
4: "00005"
5: "00006"
6: "00007"
7: "49095"
*/
padding string has been inplemented in new javascript version.
str.padStart(targetLength [, padString])
https://developer.mozilla.org/es/docs/Web/JavaScript/Referencia/Objetos_globales/String/padStart
If you want your own function check this example:
const myString = 'Welcome to my house';
String.prototype.padLeft = function(times = 0, str = ' ') {
return (Array(times).join(str) + this);
}
console.log(myString.padLeft(12, ':'));
//:::::::::::Welcome to my house
Here is a build in method you can use -
str1.padStart(2, '0')
Here's a simple function that I use.
var pad=function(num,field){
var n = '' + num;
var w = n.length;
var l = field.length;
var pad = w < l ? l-w : 0;
return field.substr(0,pad) + n;
};
For example:
pad (20,' '); // 20
pad (321,' '); // 321
pad (12345,' '); //12345
pad ( 15,'00000'); //00015
pad ( 999,'*****'); //**999
pad ('cat','_____'); //__cat
A short way:
(x=>(new Array(int-x.length+1)).join(char)+x)(String)
Example:
(x=>(new Array(6-x.length+1)).join("0")+x)("1234")
return: "001234"
Here is a simple answer in basically one line of code.
var value = 35 // the numerical value
var x = 5 // the minimum length of the string
var padded = ("00000" + value).substr(-x);
Make sure the number of characters in you padding, zeros here, is at least as many as your intended minimum length. So really, to put it into one line, to get a result of "00035" in this case is:
var padded = ("00000" + 35).substr(-5);
ES7 is just drafts and proposals right now, but if you wanted to track compatibility with the specification, your pad functions need:
Multi-character pad support.
Don't truncate the input string
Pad defaults to space
From my polyfill library, but apply your own due diligence for prototype extensions.
// Tests
'hello'.lpad(4) === 'hello'
'hello'.rpad(4) === 'hello'
'hello'.lpad(10) === ' hello'
'hello'.rpad(10) === 'hello '
'hello'.lpad(10, '1234') === '41234hello'
'hello'.rpad(10, '1234') === 'hello12341'
String.prototype.lpad || (String.prototype.lpad = function(length, pad)
{
if(length < this.length)
return this;
pad = pad || ' ';
let str = this;
while(str.length < length)
{
str = pad + str;
}
return str.substr( -length );
});
String.prototype.rpad || (String.prototype.rpad = function(length, pad)
{
if(length < this.length)
return this;
pad = pad || ' ';
let str = this;
while(str.length < length)
{
str += pad;
}
return str.substr(0, length);
});
Array manipulations are really slow compared to simple string concat. Of course, benchmark for your use case.
function(string, length, pad_char, append) {
string = string.toString();
length = parseInt(length) || 1;
pad_char = pad_char || ' ';
while (string.length < length) {
string = append ? string+pad_char : pad_char+string;
}
return string;
};
A variant of #Daniel LaFavers' answer.
var mask = function (background, foreground) {
bg = (new String(background));
fg = (new String(foreground));
bgl = bg.length;
fgl = fg.length;
bgs = bg.substring(0, Math.max(0, bgl - fgl));
fgs = fg.substring(Math.max(0, fgl - bgl));
return bgs + fgs;
};
For example:
mask('00000', 11 ); // '00011'
mask('00011','00' ); // '00000'
mask( 2 , 3 ); // '3'
mask('0' ,'111'); // '1'
mask('fork' ,'***'); // 'f***'
mask('_____','dog'); // '__dog'
If you don't mind including a utility library, lodash library has _.pad, _.padLeft and _.padRight functions.
I think its better to avoid recursion because its costly.
function padLeft(str,size,padwith) {
if(size <= str.length) {
// not padding is required.
return str;
} else {
// 1- take array of size equal to number of padding char + 1. suppose if string is 55 and we want 00055 it means we have 3 padding char so array size should be 3 + 1 (+1 will explain below)
// 2- now join this array with provided padding char (padwith) or default one ('0'). so it will produce '000'
// 3- now append '000' with orginal string (str = 55), will produce 00055
// why +1 in size of array?
// it is a trick, that we are joining an array of empty element with '0' (in our case)
// if we want to join items with '0' then we should have at least 2 items in the array to get joined (array with single item doesn't need to get joined).
// <item>0<item>0<item>0<item> to get 3 zero we need 4 (3+1) items in array
return Array(size-str.length+1).join(padwith||'0')+str
}
}
alert(padLeft("59",5) + "\n" +
padLeft("659",5) + "\n" +
padLeft("5919",5) + "\n" +
padLeft("59879",5) + "\n" +
padLeft("5437899",5));
It's 2014, and I suggest a JavaScript string-padding function. Ha!
Bare-bones: right-pad with spaces
function pad (str, length) {
var padding = (new Array(Math.max(length - str.length + 1, 0))).join(" ");
return str + padding;
}
Fancy: pad with options
/**
* #param {*} str Input string, or any other type (will be converted to string)
* #param {number} length Desired length to pad the string to
* #param {Object} [opts]
* #param {string} [opts.padWith=" "] Character to use for padding
* #param {boolean} [opts.padLeft=false] Whether to pad on the left
* #param {boolean} [opts.collapseEmpty=false] Whether to return an empty string if the input was empty
* #returns {string}
*/
function pad(str, length, opts) {
var padding = (new Array(Math.max(length - (str + "").length + 1, 0))).join(opts && opts.padWith || " "),
collapse = opts && opts.collapseEmpty && !(str + "").length;
return collapse ? "" : opts && opts.padLeft ? padding + str : str + padding;
}
Usage (fancy):
pad("123", 5);
// Returns "123 "
pad(123, 5);
// Returns "123 " - non-string input
pad("123", 5, { padWith: "0", padLeft: true });
// Returns "00123"
pad("", 5);
// Returns " "
pad("", 5, { collapseEmpty: true });
// Returns ""
pad("1234567", 5);
// Returns "1234567"
/**************************************************************************************************
Pad a string to pad_length fillig it with pad_char.
By default the function performs a left pad, unless pad_right is set to true.
If the value of pad_length is negative, less than, or equal to the length of the input string, no padding takes place.
**************************************************************************************************/
if(!String.prototype.pad)
String.prototype.pad = function(pad_char, pad_length, pad_right)
{
var result = this;
if( (typeof pad_char === 'string') && (pad_char.length === 1) && (pad_length > this.length) )
{
var padding = new Array(pad_length - this.length + 1).join(pad_char); //thanks to http://stackoverflow.com/questions/202605/repeat-string-javascript/2433358#2433358
result = (pad_right ? result + padding : padding + result);
}
return result;
}
And then you can do:
alert( "3".pad("0", 3) ); //shows "003"
alert( "hi".pad(" ", 3) ); //shows " hi"
alert( "hi".pad(" ", 3, true) ); //shows "hi "
If you just want a very simple hacky one-liner to pad, just make a string of the desired padding character of the desired max padding length and then substring it to the length of what you want to pad.
Example: padding the string store in e with spaces to 25 characters long.
var e = "hello"; e = e + " ".substring(e.length)
Result: "hello "
If you want to do the same with a number as input just call .toString() on it before.
A friend asked about using a JavaScript function to pad left. It turned into a little bit of an endeavor between some of us in chat to code golf it. This was the result:
function l(p,t,v){
v+="";return v.length>=t?v:l(p,t,p+v);
}
It ensures that the value to be padded is a string, and then if it isn't the length of the total desired length it will pad it once and then recurse. Here is what it looks like with more logical naming and structure
function padLeft(pad, totalLength, value){
value = value.toString();
if( value.length >= totalLength ){
return value;
}else{
return padLeft(pad, totalLength, pad + value);
}
}
The example we were using was to ensure that numbers were padded with 0 to the left to make a max length of 6. Here is an example set:
function l(p,t,v){v+="";return v.length>=t?v:l(p,t,p+v);}
var vals = [6451,123,466750];
var pad = l(0,6,vals[0]);// pad with 0's, max length 6
var pads = vals.map(function(i){ return l(0,6,i) });
document.write(pads.join("<br />"));
A little late, but thought I might share anyway. I found it useful to add a prototype extension to Object. That way I can pad numbers and strings, left or right. I have a module with similar utilities I include in my scripts.
// include the module in your script, there is no need to export
var jsAddOns = require('<path to module>/jsAddOns');
~~~~~~~~~~~~ jsAddOns.js ~~~~~~~~~~~~
/*
* method prototype for any Object to pad it's toString()
* representation with additional characters to the specified length
*
* #param padToLength required int
* entire length of padded string (original + padding)
* #param padChar optional char
* character to use for padding, default is white space
* #param padLeft optional boolean
* if true padding added to left
* if omitted or false, padding added to right
*
* #return padded string or
* original string if length is >= padToLength
*/
Object.prototype.pad = function(padToLength, padChar, padLeft) {
// get the string value
s = this.toString()
// default padToLength to 0
// if omitted, original string is returned
padToLength = padToLength || 0;
// default padChar to empty space
padChar = padChar || ' ';
// ignore padding if string too long
if (s.length >= padToLength) {
return s;
}
// create the pad of appropriate length
var pad = Array(padToLength - s.length).join(padChar);
// add pad to right or left side
if (padLeft) {
return pad + s;
} else {
return s + pad;
}
};
Never insert data somewhere (especially not at beginning, like str = pad + str;), since the data will be reallocated everytime. Append always at end!
Don't pad your string in the loop. Leave it alone and build your pad string first. In the end concatenate it with your main string.
Don't assign padding string each time (like str += pad;). It is much faster to append the padding string to itself and extract first x-chars (the parser can do this efficiently if you extract from first char). This is exponential growth, which means that it wastes some memory temporarily (you should not do this with extremely huge texts).
if (!String.prototype.lpad) {
String.prototype.lpad = function(pad, len) {
while (pad.length < len) {
pad += pad;
}
return pad.substr(0, len-this.length) + this;
}
}
if (!String.prototype.rpad) {
String.prototype.rpad = function(pad, len) {
while (pad.length < len) {
pad += pad;
}
return this + pad.substr(0, len-this.length);
}
}
Here is a JavaScript function that adds a specified number of paddings with a custom symbol. The function takes three parameters.
padMe --> string or number to left pad
pads --> number of pads
padSymble --> custom symbol, default is "0"
function leftPad(padMe, pads, padSymble) {
if(typeof padMe === "undefined") {
padMe = "";
}
if (typeof pads === "undefined") {
pads = 0;
}
if (typeof padSymble === "undefined") {
padSymble = "0";
}
var symble = "";
var result = [];
for(var i=0; i < pads; i++) {
symble += padSymble;
}
var length = symble.length - padMe.toString().length;
result = symble.substring(0, length);
return result.concat(padMe.toString());
}
Here are some results:
> leftPad(1)
"1"
> leftPad(1, 4)
"0001"
> leftPad(1, 4, "0")
"0001"
> leftPad(1, 4, "#")
"###1"
Yet another take at with combination of a couple of solutions:
/**
* pad string on left
* #param {number} number of digits to pad, default is 2
* #param {string} string to use for padding, default is '0' *
* #returns {string} padded string
*/
String.prototype.paddingLeft = function (b, c) {
if (this.length > (b||2))
return this + '';
return (this || c || 0) + '', b = new Array((++b || 3) - this.length).join(c || 0), b + this
};
/**
* pad string on right
* #param {number} number of digits to pad, default is 2
* #param {string} string to use for padding, default is '0' *
* #returns {string} padded string
*/
String.prototype.paddingRight = function (b, c) {
if (this.length > (b||2))
return this + '';
return (this||c||0) + '', b = new Array((++b || 3) - this.length).join(c || 0), this + b
};

Wrong Convert amount

The following function works perfect, but when the amount over 1 million, the function don't work exactly.
Example:
AMOUNTPAID = 35555
The output is: 35.555,00 - work fine
But when the amount paid is for example: 1223578 (over 1 Million),
is the output the following output value: 1.223.235,00 (but it must be: 1.223.578,00) - there is a deviation of 343
Any ideas?
I call the function via HTML as follows:
<td class="tr1 td2"><p class="p2 ft4"><script type="text/javascript">document.write(ConvertBetrag('{{NETAMOUNT}}'))</script> €</P></TD>
#
Here ist the Javascript:
function Convertamount( amount ){
var number = amount;
number = Math.round(number * Math.pow(12, 2)) / Math.pow(12, 2);
number = number.toFixed(2);
number = number.toString();
var negative = false;
if (number.indexOf("-") == 0)
{
negative = true ;
number = number.replace("-","");
}
var str = number.toString();
str = str.replace(".", ",");
// number before decimal point
var intbeforedecimaln = str.length - (str.length - str.indexOf(","));
// number of delimiters
var intKTrenner = Math.floor((intbeforedecimaln - 1) / 3);
// Leading digits before the first dot
var intZiffern = (intbeforedecimaln % 3 == 0) ? 3 : (intbeforedecimaln % 3);
// Provided digits before the first thousand separator with point
strNew = str.substring(0, intZiffern);
// Auxiliary string without the previously treated digits
strHelp = str.substr(intZiffern, (str.length - intZiffern));
// Through thousands of remaining ...
for(var i=0; i<intKTrenner; i++)
{
// attach 3 digits of the nearest thousand group point to String
strNew += "." + strHelp.substring(0, 3);
// Post new auxiliary string without the 3 digits being treated
strHelp = strHelp.substr(intZiffern, (strHelp.length - intZiffern));
}
// attach a decimal
var szdecimal = str.substring(intbeforedecimaln, str.length);
if (szdecimal.length < 3 )
{
strNew += str.substring(intbeforedecimaln, str.length) + '0';
}
else
{
strNew += str.substring(intbeforedecimaln, str.length);
}
var number = strNew;
if (negative)
{
number = "- " + number ;
}
return number;
}
JavaScript's Math functions have a toLocaleString method. Why don't you just use this?
var n = (1223578.00).toLocaleString();
-> "1,223,578.00"
The locale you wish to use can be passed in as a parameter, for instance:
var n = (1223578.00).toLocaleString('de-DE');
-> "1.223.578,00"

Javascript adding zeros to the beginning of a string (max length 4 chars)

var number = 1310;
should be left alone.
var number = 120;
should be changed to "0120";
var number = 10;
should be changed to "0010";
var number = 7;
should be changed to "0007";
In all modern browsers you can use
numberStr.padStart(4, "0");
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/String/padStart
function zeroPad(num) {
return num.toString().padStart(4, "0");
}
var numbers = [1310, 120, 10, 7];
numbers.forEach(
function(num) {
var paddedNum = zeroPad(num);
console.log(paddedNum);
}
);
function pad_with_zeroes(number, length) {
var my_string = '' + number;
while (my_string.length < length) {
my_string = '0' + my_string;
}
return my_string;
}
try these:
('0000' + number).slice(-4);
or
(number+'').padStart(4,'0');
Here's another way. Comes from something I did that needs to be done thousands of times on a page load. It's pretty CPU efficient to hard code a string of zeroes one time, and chop as many as you need for the pad as many times as needed. I do really like the power of 10 method -- that's pretty flexible.
Anyway, this is as efficient as I could come up with:
For the original question, CHOOSE ONE of the cases...
var number = 1310;
var number = 120;
var number = 10;
var number = 7;
then
// only needs to happen once
var zeroString = "00000";
// one assignment gets the padded number
var paddedNum = zeroString.substring((number + "").length, 4) + bareNum;
//output
alert("The padded number string is: " + paddedNum);
Of course you still need to validate the input. Because this ONLY works reliably under the following conditions:
Number of zeroes in the zeroString is desired_length + 1
Number of digits in your starting number is less than or equal to your desired length
Backstory:
I have a case that needs a fixed length (14 digit) zero-padded number. I wanted to see how basic I could make this. It's run tens of thousands of times on a page load, so efficiency matters. It's not quite re-usable as-is, and it's a bit inelegant. Except that it is very very simple.
For desired n digits padded string, this method requires a string of (at least) n+1 zeroes. Index 0 is the first character in the string, which won't ever be used, so really, it could be anything.
Note also that string.substring() is different from string.substr()!
var bareNum = 42 + '';
var zeroString = "000000000000000";
var paddedNum = zeroString.substring(bareNumber.length, 14) + bareNum
This pulls zeroes from zeroString starting at the position matching the length of the string, and continues to get zeroes to the necessary length of 14. As long as that "14" in the third line is a lower integer than the number of characters in zeroString, it will work.
function pad(n, len) {
return (new Array(len + 1).join('0') + n).slice(-len);
}
might not work in old IE versions.
//to: 0 - to left, 1 - to right
String.prototype.pad = function(_char, len, to) {
if (!this || !_char || this.length >= len) {
return this;
}
to = to || 0;
var ret = this;
var max = (len - this.length)/_char.length + 1;
while (--max) {
ret = (to) ? ret + _char : _char + ret;
}
return ret;
};
Usage:
someString.pad(neededChars, neededLength)
Example:
'332'.pad('0', 6); //'000332'
'332'.pad('0', 6, 1); //'332000'
An approach I like is to add 10^N to the number, where N is the number of zeros you want. Treat the resultant number as a string and slice off the zeroth digit. Of course, you'll want to be careful if your input number might be larger than your pad length, but it's still much faster than the loop method:
// You want to pad four places:
>>> var N = Math.pow(10, 4)
>>> var number = 1310
>>> number < N ? ("" + (N + number)).slice(1) : "" + number
"1310"
>>> var number = 120
>>> number < N ? ("" + (N + number)).slice(1) : "" + number
"0120"
>>> var number = 10
>>> number < N ? ("" + (N + number)).slice(1) : "" + number
"0010"
…
etc. You can make this into a function easily enough:
/**
* Pad a number with leading zeros to "pad" places:
*
* #param number: The number to pad
* #param pad: The maximum number of leading zeros
*/
function padNumber(number, pad) {
var N = Math.pow(10, pad);
return number < N ? ("" + (N + number)).slice(1) : "" + number
}
I wrote a general function for this. It takes an input control and pad length as input.
function padLeft(input, padLength) {
var num = $("#" + input).val();
$("#" + input).val(('0'.repeat(padLength) + num).slice(-padLength));
}
With RegExp/JavaScript:
var number = 7;
number = ('0000'+number).match(/\d{4}$/);
console.log(number);
With Function/RegExp/JavaScript:
var number = 7;
function padFix(n) {
return ('0000'+n).match(/\d{4}$/);
}
console.log(padFix(number));
No loop, no functions
let n = "" + 100;
let x = ("0000000000" + n).substring(n.length);//add your amount of zeros
alert(x + "-" + x.length);
Nate as the best way I found, it's just way too long to read. So I provide you with 3 simples solutions.
1. So here's my simplification of Nate's answer.
//number = 42
"0000".substring(number.toString().length, 4) + number;
2. Here's a solution that make it more reusable by using a function that takes the number and the desired length in parameters.
function pad_with_zeroes(number, len) {
var zeroes = "0".repeat(len);
return zeroes.substring(number.toString().length, len) + number;
}
// Usage: pad_with_zeroes(42,4);
// Returns "0042"
3. Here's a third solution, extending the Number prototype.
Number.prototype.toStringMinLen = function(len) {
var zeroes = "0".repeat(len);
return zeroes.substring(self.toString().length, len) + self;
}
//Usage: tmp=42; tmp.toStringMinLen(4)
Use String.JS librairy function padLeft:
S('123').padLeft(5, '0').s --> 00123

How to count string occurrence in string?

How can I count the number of times a particular string occurs in another string. For example, this is what I am trying to do in Javascript:
var temp = "This is a string.";
alert(temp.count("is")); //should output '2'
The g in the regular expression (short for global) says to search the whole string rather than just find the first occurrence. This matches is twice:
var temp = "This is a string.";
var count = (temp.match(/is/g) || []).length;
console.log(count);
And, if there are no matches, it returns 0:
var temp = "Hello World!";
var count = (temp.match(/is/g) || []).length;
console.log(count);
/** Function that count occurrences of a substring in a string;
* #param {String} string The string
* #param {String} subString The sub string to search for
* #param {Boolean} [allowOverlapping] Optional. (Default:false)
*
* #author Vitim.us https://gist.github.com/victornpb/7736865
* #see Unit Test https://jsfiddle.net/Victornpb/5axuh96u/
* #see https://stackoverflow.com/a/7924240/938822
*/
function occurrences(string, subString, allowOverlapping) {
string += "";
subString += "";
if (subString.length <= 0) return (string.length + 1);
var n = 0,
pos = 0,
step = allowOverlapping ? 1 : subString.length;
while (true) {
pos = string.indexOf(subString, pos);
if (pos >= 0) {
++n;
pos += step;
} else break;
}
return n;
}
Usage
occurrences("foofoofoo", "bar"); //0
occurrences("foofoofoo", "foo"); //3
occurrences("foofoofoo", "foofoo"); //1
allowOverlapping
occurrences("foofoofoo", "foofoo", true); //2
Matches:
foofoofoo
1 `----´
2 `----´
Unit Test
https://jsfiddle.net/Victornpb/5axuh96u/
Benchmark
I've made a benchmark test and my function is more then 10 times
faster then the regexp match function posted by gumbo. In my test
string is 25 chars length. with 2 occurences of the character 'o'. I
executed 1 000 000 times in Safari.
Safari 5.1
Benchmark> Total time execution: 5617 ms (regexp)
Benchmark> Total time execution: 881 ms (my function 6.4x faster)
Firefox 4
Benchmark> Total time execution: 8547 ms (Rexexp)
Benchmark> Total time execution: 634 ms (my function 13.5x faster)
Edit: changes I've made
cached substring length
added type-casting to string.
added optional 'allowOverlapping' parameter
fixed correct output for "" empty substring case.
Gist
https://gist.github.com/victornpb/7736865
function countInstances(string, word) {
return string.split(word).length - 1;
}
console.log(countInstances("This is a string", "is"))
You can try this:
var theString = "This is a string.";
console.log(theString.split("is").length - 1);
My solution:
var temp = "This is a string.";
function countOccurrences(str, value) {
var regExp = new RegExp(value, "gi");
return (str.match(regExp) || []).length;
}
console.log(countOccurrences(temp, 'is'));
You can use match to define such function:
String.prototype.count = function(search) {
var m = this.match(new RegExp(search.toString().replace(/(?=[.\\+*?[^\]$(){}\|])/g, "\\"), "g"));
return m ? m.length:0;
}
Just code-golfing Rebecca Chernoff's solution :-)
alert(("This is a string.".match(/is/g) || []).length);
The non-regex version:
var string = 'This is a string',
searchFor = 'is',
count = 0,
pos = string.indexOf(searchFor);
while (pos > -1) {
++count;
pos = string.indexOf(searchFor, ++pos);
}
console.log(count); // 2
String.prototype.Count = function (find) {
return this.split(find).length - 1;
}
console.log("This is a string.".Count("is"));
This will return 2.
Here is the fastest function!
Why is it faster?
Doesn't check char by char (with 1 exception)
Uses a while and increments 1 var (the char count var) vs. a for loop checking the length and incrementing 2 vars (usually var i and a var with the char count)
Uses WAY less vars
Doesn't use regex!
Uses an (hopefully) highly optimized function
All operations are as combined as they can be, avoiding slowdowns due to multiple operations
String.prototype.timesCharExist=function(c){var t=0,l=0,c=(c+'')[0];while(l=this.indexOf(c,l)+1)++t;return t};
Here is a slower and more readable version:
String.prototype.timesCharExist = function ( chr ) {
var total = 0, last_location = 0, single_char = ( chr + '' )[0];
while( last_location = this.indexOf( single_char, last_location ) + 1 )
{
total = total + 1;
}
return total;
};
This one is slower because of the counter, long var names and misuse of 1 var.
To use it, you simply do this:
'The char "a" only shows up twice'.timesCharExist('a');
Edit: (2013/12/16)
DON'T use with Opera 12.16 or older! it will take almost 2.5x more than the regex solution!
On chrome, this solution will take between 14ms and 20ms for 1,000,000 characters.
The regex solution takes 11-14ms for the same amount.
Using a function (outside String.prototype) will take about 10-13ms.
Here is the code used:
String.prototype.timesCharExist=function(c){var t=0,l=0,c=(c+'')[0];while(l=this.indexOf(c,l)+1)++t;return t};
var x=Array(100001).join('1234567890');
console.time('proto');x.timesCharExist('1');console.timeEnd('proto');
console.time('regex');x.match(/1/g).length;console.timeEnd('regex');
var timesCharExist=function(x,c){var t=0,l=0,c=(c+'')[0];while(l=x.indexOf(c,l)+1)++t;return t;};
console.time('func');timesCharExist(x,'1');console.timeEnd('func');
The result of all the solutions should be 100,000!
Note: if you want this function to count more than 1 char, change where is c=(c+'')[0] into c=c+''
var temp = "This is a string.";
console.log((temp.match(new RegExp("is", "g")) || []).length);
A simple way would be to split the string on the required word, the word for which we want to calculate the number of occurences, and subtract 1 from the number of parts:
function checkOccurences(string, word) {
return string.split(word).length - 1;
}
const text="Let us see. see above, see below, see forward, see backward, see left, see right until we will be right";
const count=countOccurences(text,"see "); // 2
I think the purpose for regex is much different from indexOf.
indexOf simply find the occurance of a certain string while in regex you can use wildcards like [A-Z] which means it will find any capital character in the word without stating the actual character.
Example:
var index = "This is a string".indexOf("is");
console.log(index);
var length = "This is a string".match(/[a-z]/g).length;
// where [a-z] is a regex wildcard expression thats why its slower
console.log(length);
Super duper old, but I needed to do something like this today and only thought to check SO afterwards. Works pretty fast for me.
String.prototype.count = function(substr,start,overlap) {
overlap = overlap || false;
start = start || 0;
var count = 0,
offset = overlap ? 1 : substr.length;
while((start = this.indexOf(substr, start) + offset) !== (offset - 1))
++count;
return count;
};
var myString = "This is a string.";
var foundAtPosition = 0;
var Count = 0;
while (foundAtPosition != -1)
{
foundAtPosition = myString.indexOf("is",foundAtPosition);
if (foundAtPosition != -1)
{
Count++;
foundAtPosition++;
}
}
document.write("There are " + Count + " occurrences of the word IS");
Refer :- count a substring appears in the string for step by step explanation.
Building upon #Vittim.us answer above. I like the control his method gives me, making it easy to extend, but I needed to add case insensitivity and limit matches to whole words with support for punctuation. (e.g. "bath" is in "take a bath." but not "bathing")
The punctuation regex came from: https://stackoverflow.com/a/25575009/497745 (How can I strip all punctuation from a string in JavaScript using regex?)
function keywordOccurrences(string, subString, allowOverlapping, caseInsensitive, wholeWord)
{
string += "";
subString += "";
if (subString.length <= 0) return (string.length + 1); //deal with empty strings
if(caseInsensitive)
{
string = string.toLowerCase();
subString = subString.toLowerCase();
}
var n = 0,
pos = 0,
step = allowOverlapping ? 1 : subString.length,
stringLength = string.length,
subStringLength = subString.length;
while (true)
{
pos = string.indexOf(subString, pos);
if (pos >= 0)
{
var matchPos = pos;
pos += step; //slide forward the position pointer no matter what
if(wholeWord) //only whole word matches are desired
{
if(matchPos > 0) //if the string is not at the very beginning we need to check if the previous character is whitespace
{
if(!/[\s\u2000-\u206F\u2E00-\u2E7F\\'!"#$%&\(\)*+,\-.\/:;<=>?#\[\]^_`{|}~]/.test(string[matchPos - 1])) //ignore punctuation
{
continue; //then this is not a match
}
}
var matchEnd = matchPos + subStringLength;
if(matchEnd < stringLength - 1)
{
if (!/[\s\u2000-\u206F\u2E00-\u2E7F\\'!"#$%&\(\)*+,\-.\/:;<=>?#\[\]^_`{|}~]/.test(string[matchEnd])) //ignore punctuation
{
continue; //then this is not a match
}
}
}
++n;
} else break;
}
return n;
}
Please feel free to modify and refactor this answer if you spot bugs or improvements.
For anyone that finds this thread in the future, note that the accepted answer will not always return the correct value if you generalize it, since it will choke on regex operators like $ and .. Here's a better version, that can handle any needle:
function occurrences (haystack, needle) {
var _needle = needle
.replace(/\[/g, '\\[')
.replace(/\]/g, '\\]')
return (
haystack.match(new RegExp('[' + _needle + ']', 'g')) || []
).length
}
Try it
<?php
$str = "33,33,56,89,56,56";
echo substr_count($str, '56');
?>
<script type="text/javascript">
var temp = "33,33,56,89,56,56";
var count = temp.match(/56/g);
alert(count.length);
</script>
Simple version without regex:
var temp = "This is a string.";
var count = (temp.split('is').length - 1);
alert(count);
No one will ever see this, but it's good to bring back recursion and arrow functions once in a while (pun gloriously intended)
String.prototype.occurrencesOf = function(s, i) {
return (n => (n === -1) ? 0 : 1 + this.occurrencesOf(s, n + 1))(this.indexOf(s, (i || 0)));
};
function substrCount( str, x ) {
let count = -1, pos = 0;
do {
pos = str.indexOf( x, pos ) + 1;
count++;
} while( pos > 0 );
return count;
}
ES2020 offers a new MatchAll which might be of use in this particular context.
Here we create a new RegExp, please ensure you pass 'g' into the function.
Convert the result using Array.from and count the length, which returns 2 as per the original requestor's desired output.
let strToCheck = RegExp('is', 'g')
let matchesReg = "This is a string.".matchAll(strToCheck)
console.log(Array.from(matchesReg).length) // 2
Now this is a very old thread i've come across but as many have pushed their answer's, here is mine in a hope to help someone with this simple code.
var search_value = "This is a dummy sentence!";
var letter = 'a'; /*Can take any letter, have put in a var if anyone wants to use this variable dynamically*/
letter = letter && "string" === typeof letter ? letter : "";
var count;
for (var i = count = 0; i < search_value.length; count += (search_value[i++] == letter));
console.log(count);
I'm not sure if it is the fastest solution but i preferred it for simplicity and for not using regex (i just don't like using them!)
You could try this
let count = s.length - s.replace(/is/g, "").length;
We can use the js split function, and it's length minus 1 will be the number of occurrences.
var temp = "This is a string.";
alert(temp.split('is').length-1);
Here is my solution. I hope it would help someone
const countOccurence = (string, char) => {
const chars = string.match(new RegExp(char, 'g')).length
return chars;
}
var countInstances = function(body, target) {
var globalcounter = 0;
var concatstring = '';
for(var i=0,j=target.length;i<body.length;i++){
concatstring = body.substring(i-1,j);
if(concatstring === target){
globalcounter += 1;
concatstring = '';
}
}
return globalcounter;
};
console.log( countInstances('abcabc', 'abc') ); // ==> 2
console.log( countInstances('ababa', 'aba') ); // ==> 2
console.log( countInstances('aaabbb', 'ab') ); // ==> 1
substr_count translated to Javascript from php
Locutus (Package that translates Php to JS)
substr_count (official page, code copied below)
function substr_count (haystack, needle, offset, length) {
// eslint-disable-line camelcase
// discuss at: https://locutus.io/php/substr_count/
// original by: Kevin van Zonneveld (https://kvz.io)
// bugfixed by: Onno Marsman (https://twitter.com/onnomarsman)
// improved by: Brett Zamir (https://brett-zamir.me)
// improved by: Thomas
// example 1: substr_count('Kevin van Zonneveld', 'e')
// returns 1: 3
// example 2: substr_count('Kevin van Zonneveld', 'K', 1)
// returns 2: 0
// example 3: substr_count('Kevin van Zonneveld', 'Z', 0, 10)
// returns 3: false
var cnt = 0
haystack += ''
needle += ''
if (isNaN(offset)) {
offset = 0
}
if (isNaN(length)) {
length = 0
}
if (needle.length === 0) {
return false
}
offset--
while ((offset = haystack.indexOf(needle, offset + 1)) !== -1) {
if (length > 0 && (offset + needle.length) > length) {
return false
}
cnt++
}
return cnt
}
Check out Locutus's Translation Of Php's substr_count function
The parameters:
ustring: the superset string
countChar: the substring
A function to count substring occurrence in JavaScript:
function subStringCount(ustring, countChar){
var correspCount = 0;
var corresp = false;
var amount = 0;
var prevChar = null;
for(var i=0; i!=ustring.length; i++){
if(ustring.charAt(i) == countChar.charAt(0) && corresp == false){
corresp = true;
correspCount += 1;
if(correspCount == countChar.length){
amount+=1;
corresp = false;
correspCount = 0;
}
prevChar = 1;
}
else if(ustring.charAt(i) == countChar.charAt(prevChar) && corresp == true){
correspCount += 1;
if(correspCount == countChar.length){
amount+=1;
corresp = false;
correspCount = 0;
prevChar = null;
}else{
prevChar += 1 ;
}
}else{
corresp = false;
correspCount = 0;
}
}
return amount;
}
console.log(subStringCount('Hello World, Hello World', 'll'));
var str = 'stackoverflow';
var arr = Array.from(str);
console.log(arr);
for (let a = 0; a <= arr.length; a++) {
var temp = arr[a];
var c = 0;
for (let b = 0; b <= arr.length; b++) {
if (temp === arr[b]) {
c++;
}
}
console.log(`the ${arr[a]} is counted for ${c}`)
}

Categories