We Keep Coding

Utilizing setTimeout to alter Call Stack order

I have an asynchronous function running in my web application that enables a chat input. In a different component I need to set a variable to the input and then focus() on it when certain conditionals are met. Unfortunately the chat input DOM element isn't always available when I try to declare it based on the asynchronous nature of the function that enables it. Being familiar with how setTimeoout() works with the call stack I wrapped my declaration in a setTimeout and everything (seemingly) works as expected now.
So my question is if this is a good practice or not? I'm using React/Redux and will have to do a lot of prop threading and extra logic to get a seemingly easy task accomplished without the setTimeout.

It is an alright practice ;)
It gets the job done, but it is usually preferable to work with callbacks or promises instead of polling to see if the dom is ready. The main failing with a "setTimeout" approach is that you are setting a timer and what if the resource (chat plugin) takes longer to load than the timer you set.
// Run it
main();
// Supporting code
function main() {
let attempts = 0;
const maxAttempts = 10;
tryUpdate();
function tryUpdate() {
// Call it once
attempts++;
const success = updateAndFocus();
console.log(attempts);
// Keep calling it every 100ms
if (!success && attempts < maxAttempts) {
setTimeout(() => tryUpdate(), 100);
}
}
}
function updateAndFocus() {
const el = document.getElementById('findme');
if (!el) return false;
// do work
el.focus;
return true;
}

Forcing code to run sequentially in JavaScript

In a Angular.js and Socket.io App, I want to show a loading before sending an image via Socket.io. I write this code:
When a button clicked this code runs, first i want to run startLoading function and after that I want to send image:
$scope.startLoading(function(){
$scope.socket.emit('sendImg', {
data: $scope.newImg,
});
});
and this is my startLoading function:
$scope.startLoading = function (callback) {
//DO SOME STUFF LIKE ENABLING LOADING ANIMATION
$scope.animation =true; //binded to UI
$scope.errors = false; //binded to UI
callback(); //it seems this code runs before above lines
};
But it seems callback() line runs before first two lines and because of that, my loading appears after sending of image to the server! why? i change callback line to a timeout like this and it works fine but is this a good solution? i dont think! what i have to do for a standard code?
$scope.startLoading = function (callback) {
//DO SOME STUFF LIKE ENABLING LOADING ANIMATION
$scope.animation =true; //binded to UI
$scope.errors = false; //binded to UI
$timeout(function(){callback();}, 1000);
};
Actually, code runs sequentially but calling callback and sending image freezes page and because of that, my loading appears after freezing ends. but i need before freezing, loading starts

Your code really does run sequentially, but the first two lines don't change the UI immediately.
When you assign some value to a scope variable, it's just that, a variable assignment. It doesn't trigger any events. Angular will only update the UI later, when it evaluates the bindings and finds the change. So here is what happens:
$scope.startLoading = function (callback) {
// Presumably this is called from some event from Angular,
// so all this is run in an $apply, in an Angular "context".
// But this is still "plain" javascript, so the next two lines
// are just plain variable assignments.
$scope.animation =true;
$scope.errors = false;
callback(); // This function does its thing, then returns
// When this function returns, Angular will evaluate all of its
// bindings, will find that the above values have changed,
// and will update the DOM.
};
For details, see the "Integration with the browser event loop" section in the dev guide.
What you want is to ensure that the DOM is updated before your callback runs. I think there is nothing wrong with using $timeout for this.
There might be a better/nicer way, but I haven't found it yet...
So it would become something like this:
$scope.startLoading = function (callback) {
$scope.animation =true; // at this point, these are just
$scope.errors = false; // plain variable assignments
$timeout(callback); // schedule callback to run later
// After this returns, Angular will evaluate its bindings,
// and update the DOM, so if $scope.animation and $scope.errors
// are bound to something, they can trigger some visible change.
// callback will be called in the next $digest cycle, so _after_
// the DOM has been updated
};
(There is no need to specify a value for the timeout if you only want to run it in the next "tick". Also, there is no need to wrap callback, it can be directly passed to $timeout.)
Hope this helps!

js - check if a function is completed

I want to set a hotkey to several functions by jquery hotkeys. And I need to check if a function is finished, may be something like:
if("function A is completed")
{
"Ctrl+A is now set to function B"
}
else
{
"Ctrl+A is set to function A"
}
How could I check this? Or any better ideas?

JavaScript on web browsers is single-threaded (barring the use of web workers, and even with those a function can't be interrupted), so except for a couple of bugs in issues with Firefox, a function cannot be interrupted in the middle. So if your code is running, the other function is not, by definition.
(For details on the issues with Firefox, see this answer by bobince about some very edge-case scenarios.)

Depending on the situation there are a couple of things you can do. You can call the function when you've finished completing the current function or you can set a boolean for the same thing.
function A(){
alert('run items in function A');
return fireNewFunctionWhenComplete()
}
or set a flag
/*global var*/
var functionBCompleted = false;
function B(){
alert('run items in function B');
return functionBCompleted = true;
}
function testFunctionComplete(){
if(functionBCompleted){
alert('function B Copmleted');
}
else{
alert('function B not run');
}
}
This is a very simple example and as #T.J. mentioned you can't interrupt a running process. However, you may want to take a look into the promises spec if you want to run something when an asynchronous operation has completed.

How would I design a client-side Queue system?

OVERVIEW
I'm working on a project and I've come across a bit of a problem in that things aren't happening in the order I want them to happen. So I have been thinking about designing some kind of Queue that I can use to organize function calls and other miscellaneous JavaScript/jQuery instructions used during start-up, i.e., while the page is loading. What I'm looking for doesn't necessarily need to be a Queue data structure but some system that will ensure that things execute in the order I specify and only when the previous task has been completed can the new task begin.
I've briefly looked at the jQuery Queue and the AjaxQueue but I really have no idea how they work yet so I'm not sure if that is the approach I want to take... but I'll keep reading more about these tools.
SPECIFICS
Currently, I have set things up so that some work happens inside $(document).ready(function() {...}); and other work happens inside $(window).load(function() {...});. For example,
<head>
<script type="text/javascript">
// I want this to happen 1st
$().LoadJavaScript();
// ... do some basic configuration for the stuff that needs to happen later...
// I want this to happen 2nd
$(document).ready(function() {
// ... do some work that depends on the previous work do have been completed
var script = document.createElement("script");
// ... do some more work...
});
// I want this to happen 3rd
$(window).load(function() {
// ... do some work that depends on the previous work do have been completed
$().InitializeSymbols();
$().InitializeBlock();
// ... other work ... etc...
});
</script>
</head>
... and this is really tedious and ugly, not to mention bad design. So instead of dealing with that mess, I want to design a pretty versatile system so that I can, for example, enqueue $().LoadJavaScript();, then var script = document.createElement("script");, then $().InitializeSymbols();, then $().InitializeBlock();, etc... and then the Queue would execute the function calls and instructions such that after one instruction is finished executing, the other can start, until the Queue is empty instead of me calling dequeue repeatedly.
The reasoning behind this is that some work needs to happen, like configuration and initialization, before other work can begin because of the dependency on the configuration and initialization steps to have completed. If this doesn't sound like a good solution, please let me know :)
SOME BASIC WORK
I've written some code for a basic Queue, which can be found here, but I'm looking to expand its functionality so that I can store various types of "Objects", such as individual JavaScript/jQuery instructions and function calls, essentially pieces of code that I want to execute.
UPDATE
With the current Queue that I've implemented, it looks like I can store functions and execute them later, for example:
// a JS file...
$.fn.LoadJavaScript = function() {
$.getScript("js/Symbols/Symbol.js");
$.getScript("js/Structures/Structure.js");
};
// another JS file...
function init() { // symbols and structures };
// index.html
var theQueue = new Queue();
theQueue.enqueue($().LoadJavaScript);
theQueue.enqueue(init);
var LJS = theQueue.dequeue();
var INIT = theQueue.dequeue();
LJS();
INIT();
I also think I've figured out how to store individual instructions, such as $('#equation').html(""); or perhaps even if-else statements or loops, by wrapping them as such:
theQueue.enqueue(function() { $('#equation').html(""); // other instructions, etc... });
But this approach would require me to wait until the Queue is done with its work before I can continue doing my work. This seems like an incorrect design. Is there a more clever approach to this? Also, how can I know that a certain function has completed executing so that the Queue can know to move on? Is there some kind of return value that I can wait for or a callback function that I can specify to each task in the Queue?
WRAP-UP
Since I'm doing everything client-side and I can't have the Queue do its own thing independently (according to an answer below), is there a more clever solution than me just waiting for the Queue to finish its work?
Since this is more of a design question than a specific code question, I'm looking for suggestions on an approach to solving my problem, advice on how I should design this system, but I definitely welcome, and would love to see, code to back up the suggestions :) I also welcome any criticism regarding the Queue.js file I've linked to above and/or my description of my problem and the approach I'm planning to take to resolve it.
Thanks, Hristo

I would suggest using http://headjs.com/ It allows you to load js files in parallel, but execute them sequentially, essentially the same thing you want to do. It's pretty small, and you could always use it for inspiration.
I would also mention that handlers that rely on execution order are not good design. I am always able to place all my bootstrap code in the ready event handler. There are cases where you'd need to use the load handler if you need access to images, but it hasn't been very often for me.

Here is something that might work, is this what you're after?
var q = (function(){
var queue = [];
var enqueue = function(fnc){
if(typeof fnc === "function"){
queue.push(fnc);
}
};
var executeAll = function(){
var someVariable = "Inside the Queue";
while(queue.length>0){
queue.shift()();
}
};
return {
enqueue:enqueue,
executeAll:executeAll
};
}());
var someVariable = "Outside!"
q.enqueue(function(){alert("hi");});
q.enqueue(function(){alert(someVariable);});
q.enqueue(function(){alert("bye");});
alert("test");
q.executeAll();
the alert("test"); runs before anything you've put in the queue.

how do I store pieces of code in the Queue and have it execute later
Your current implementation already works for that. There are no declared types in JavaScript, so your queue can hold anything, including function objects:
queue.enqueue(myfunc);
var f = queue.dequeue();
f();
how can I have the Queue do its own thing independently
JavaScript is essentially single-threaded, meaning only one thing can execute at any instant of time. So the queue can't really operate "independently" of the rest of your code, if that is what you mean.
You basically have two choices:
Run all the queued functions, one after the other, in a single go -- this doesn't even require a queue since it is the same as simply putting the function calls directly in your code.
Use timed events: run one function at a time and once it completes, set a timeout to execute the next queued function after a certain interval. An example of this follows.
function run() {
var func = this.dequeue();
func();
var self = this;
setTimeout(function() { self.run(); }, 1000);
}
If func is an asynchronous request, you'll have to move setTimeout into the callback function.

**The main functions**
**From there we can define the main elements required:**
var q=[];//our queue container
var paused=false; // a boolean flag
function queue() {}
function dequeue() {}
function next() {}
function flush() {}
function clear() {}
**you may also want to 'pause' the queue. We will therefore use a boolean flag too.
Now let's see the implementation, this is going to be very straightforward:**
var q = [];
var paused = false;
function queue() {
for(var i=0;i< arguments.length;i++)
q.push(arguments[i]);
}
function dequeue() {
if(!empty()) q.pop();
}
function next() {
if(empty()) return; //check that we have something in the queue
paused=false; //if we call the next function, set to false the paused
q.shift()(); // the same as var func = q.shift(); func();
}
function flush () {
paused=false;
while(!empty()) next(); //call all stored elements
}
function empty() { //helper function
if(q.length==0) return true;
return false;
}
function clear() {
q=[];
}
**And here we have our basic queue system!
let's see how we can use it:**
queue(function() { alert(1)},function(){ alert(2)},function(){alert(3)});
next(); // alert 1
dequeue(); // the last function, alerting 3 is removed
flush(); // call everything, here alert 2
clear(); // the queue is already empty in that case but anyway...

The impossible inline Javascript delay/sleep

There is a JavaScript function, of which I have zero control of the code, which calls a function that I wrote. My function uses DOM to generate an iFrame, defines it's src and then appends it to another DOM element. However, before my function returns, and thus allows continued execution of the containing function, it is imperative that the iFrame be fully loaded.
Here are the things that I have tried and why they do not work :
1. The SetTimeout option :
99.999% of the time, this is THE answer. As a matter of fact, in the past decade that I have been mentoring in JavaScript, I have always insisted that code could always be refactored to use this option, and never believed a scenario existed where that was not the case. Well, I finally found one! The problem is that because my function is being called inline, if the very next line is executed before my iFrame finishes loading, it totally neuters my script, and since the moment my script completes, the external script continues. A callback of sorts will not work
2. The "Do nothing" loop :This option you use while(//iFrame is not loaded){//do nothing}. In theory this would not return until the frame is loaded. The problem is that since this hogs all the resources, the iFrame never loads. This trick, although horribly unprofessional, dirty etc. will work when you just need an inline delay, but since I require an external thread to complete, it will not.In FF, after a few seconds, it pauses the script and an alert pops up stating that there is an unresponsive script. While that alert is up, the iFrame is able to load, and then my function is able to return, but having the browser frozen for 10 seconds, and then requiring the user to correctly dismiss an error is a no go.
3. The model dialogue :
I was inspired by the fact that the FF popup allowed the iFrame to load while halting the execution of the function, and thinking about it, I realized that it is because the modal dialogue, is a way of halting execution yet allowing other threads to continue! Brilliant, so I decided to try other modal options. Things like alert() work beautifully! When it pops up, even if only up for 1/10th of a second, the iFrame is able to complete, and all works great. And just in case the 1/10 of a second is not sufficient, I can put the model dialogue in the while loop from solution 2, and it would ensure that the iFrame is loaded in time. Sweet right? Except for the fact that I now have to pop up a very unprofessional dialogue for the user to dismiss in order to run my script. I fought with myself about this cost/benefit of this action, but then I encountered a scenario where my code was called 10 times on a single page! Having to dismiss 10 alerts before acessing a page?! That reminds me of the late 90s script kiddie pages, and is NOT an option.
4. A gazillion other delay script out there:There are about 10 jQuery delay or sleep functions, some of them actually quite cleverly developed, but none worked. A few prototype options, and again, none I found could do it! A dozen or so other libraries and frameworks claimed they had what I needed, but alas they all conspired to give me false hope.
I am convinced that since a built in model dialogue can halt execution, while allowing other threads to continue, there must be some code accessible way to do the same thing with out user input.
The Code is literally thousands upon thousands of lines and is proprietary, so I wrote this little example of the problem for you to work with. It is important to note the ONLY code you are able to change is in the onlyThingYouCanChange function
Test File :
<html>
<head>
</head>
</html>
<body>
<div id='iFrameHolder'></div>
<script type='text/javascript'>
function unChangeableFunction()
{
new_iFrame = onlyThingYouCanChange(document.getElementById('iFrameHolder'));
new_iFrame_doc = (new_iFrame.contentWindow || new_iFrame.contentDocument);
if(new_iFrame_doc.document)new_iFrame_doc=new_iFrame_doc.document;
new_iFrame_body = new_iFrame_doc.body;
if(new_iFrame_body.innerHTML != 'Loaded?')
{
//The world explodes!!!
alert('you just blew up the world! Way to go!');
}
else
{
alert('wow, you did it! Way to go!');
}
}
var iFrameLoaded = false;
function onlyThingYouCanChange(objectToAppendIFrameTo)
{
iFrameLoaded = false;
iframe=document.createElement('iframe');
iframe.onload = new Function('iFrameLoaded = true');
iframe.src = 'blank_frame.html'; //Must use an HTML doc on the server because there is a very specific DOM structure that must be maintained.
objectToAppendIFrameTo.appendChild(iframe);
var it = 0;
while(!iFrameLoaded) //I put the limit on here so you don't
{
//If I was able to put some sort of delay here that paused the exicution of the script, but did not halt all other browser threads, and did not require user interaction we'd be golden!
//alert('test'); //This would work if it did not require user interaction!
}
return iframe;
}
unChangeableFunction();
</script>
</body>
blank_frame.html :
<html>
<head>
</head>
<body style='margin:0px'>Loaded?</body>
</html>
HERE IS THE ANSWER I MADE FROM COMBINING IDEAS FROM RESPONDERS! YOU GUYS ROCK!
new source of the function I was allowed to change :
function onlyThingYouCanChange(objectToAppendIFrameTo)
{
iFrameLoaded = false;
iframe=document.createElement('iframe');
iframe.onload = new Function('iFrameLoaded = true');
iframe.src = 'blank_frame.html'; //Must use an HTML doc on the server because there is a very specific DOM structure that must be maintained.
objectToAppendIFrameTo.appendChild(iframe);
var it = 0;
while(!iFrameLoaded) //I put the limit on here so you don't
{
if (window.XMLHttpRequest)
{
AJAX=new XMLHttpRequest();
}
else
{
AJAX=new ActiveXObject("Microsoft.XMLHTTP");
}
if (AJAX)
{
AJAX.open("GET", 'slow_page.php', false);
AJAX.send(null);
}
else
{
alert('something is wrong with AJAX!');
}
//If I was able to put some sort of delay here that paused the exicution of the script, but did not halt all other browser threads, and did not require user interaction we'd be golden!
//alert('test'); //This would work if it did not require user interaction!
}
return iframe;
}
slow_page.php :
<?
usleep(100000);//sleep for 1/10th of a second, to allow iFrame time to load without DOSing our own server!
?>
I do want to note that I stated that there was nothing outside of that function that I could change, and adding the php page did violate that "rule" but in may case I was able to do that. If I were not able to do that, I could have called blank_frame.html instead of slow_page.php, and it should have only ever needed to call it once (so 2 times per frame load) assuming that it responded in an identical amount of time as the iFrame load. If for some reason the iFrame load was slower, it might call it 2ce (a total of 3 calls to the server)

Yeah, the fact that javascript is single threaded really bites you here. You can use a synchronous ajax call to a purposefully slow page to emulate a sleep, but you aren't going to get the results you want. Why don't you just make sure that your IFrame is loaded before unchangeable function is called?

NB This is extremely hacky, and I wouldn't use it in any real-world situation. Among other potential issues, given sufficient traffic you could end up DDOSing yourself.
You could create sleep functionality by making non-asynchronous (A)JAX calls. In some older browsers this may freeze everything, but at least it won't require any kind of user response.
while (!iFrameLoaded)
{
if (XMLHTTPRequest) {
var request = new XMLHttpRequest();
} else {
var request = new ActiveXObject("Microsoft.XMLHTTP");
}
request.open('GET', 'anyoldfile.htm', false);
request.send();
// check if the iframe is loaded and set iFrameLoaded
}

What you really need is an event to be fired when the iFrame content has loaded. This is actually really easy because the page inside the iFrame has its own events and it can access scripts on the parent page. You will need to be able to change the contents of the iFrame though.
In your iFrame, you'll need this piece of code
// Use whichever DOMReady function you like, or window.onload would work
window.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded', function() {
if (parent.window.myFunction) {
parent.window.myFunction();
}
}, false);
Then in your parent page, make a function called "myFunction" and put all the scripts you need to fire in there. This should work every time.
Edit: To get this to work you really need two functions. I'm assuming that's really not an option so we'll hack the one function to contain two functions and call the right part when we need it to.
function onlyThingYouCanChange(stringOrObject) {
function createIFrame(objectToAppendIFrameTo) {
// This comment represents all the code that appends your iFrame
}
function onIFrameReady() {
// This comment represents all the stuff you want to happen when the iFrame is ready
}
// The bones of it
if (stringOrObject === "iFrameLoaded") {
onIFrameReady();
} else {
createIFrame(stringOrObject);
}
}
The script in the iFrame should now be changed to something like this:
// Use whichever DOMReady function you like, or window.onload would work
window.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded', function() {
if (parent.window.onlyThingYouCanChange) {
parent.window.onlyThingYouCanChange('iFrameLoaded');
}
}, false);
I haven't tested it, but in theory that should do it

A stupefyingly simple ;-} answer using XPCOM:
// Get instance of the XPCOM thread manager.
var threadManager=Components.classes['#mozilla.org/thread-manager;1'].getService(
Components.interfaces.nsIThreadManager);
// Release current thread.
function doThread() {threadManager.currentThread.processNextEvent(false);};
// Event enabled delay, time in ms.
function delay(time) {
var end;
var start=Date.now();
do {
end=Date.now();
doThread();
} while ((end-start) <= time);
}
Works in recent version of Firefox. Sorry no hope for Explorer!

A recursive function might help out in this case. just call the function until a global variable indicates that the frame is loaded
var iFrameStarted = false; //you need two global vars
var iFrameLoaded = false;
function onlyThingYouCanChange(objectToAppendIFrameTo)
{
if (iFrameLoaded=false) // if the frame has loaded then you are done. skip everything and return iframe
{ if (iFrameStarted = false) //otherwise start the frame if it has not been
{
iFrameStarted = true;
iframe=document.createElement('iframe');
iframe.onload = new Function('iFrameLoaded = true');
iframe.src = 'blank_frame.html'; //Must use an HTML doc on the server because there is a very specific DOM structure
objectToAppendIFrameTo.appendChild(iframe);
var it = 0;
for (i=0;i<10000;i++) {} //slow down execution so you are not recursing yourself to death
onlyThingYouCanChange(objectToAppendIFrameTo); //start the recursion process
}
else //the frame has been started so continue recursion until the frame loaded
{
for (i=0;i<10000;i++) {} //slow down execution so you are not recursing yourself to death
onlyThingYouCanChange(objectToAppendIFrameTo); recursively call your function until the frame is loaded
}
}
return iframe; //you only get here when all the recursions are finished
}

Why can you not modify the base code? For example, it could be fairly simple to change the core function from
function unChangeableFunction()
{
new_iFrame = onlyThingYouCanChange(document.getElementById('iFrameHolder'));
new_iFrame_doc = (new_iFrame.contentWindow || new_iFrame.contentDocument);
if(new_iFrame_doc.document)new_iFrame_doc=new_iFrame_doc.document;
new_iFrame_body = new_iFrame_doc.body;
if(new_iFrame_body.innerHTML != 'Loaded?')
{
//The world explodes!!!
alert('you just blew up the world! Way to go!');
}
else
{
alert('wow, you did it! Way to go!');
}
}
To something like this:
function unChangeableFunction()
{
var new_iFrame = onlyThingYouCanChange(document.getElementById('iFrameHolder'));
new_iFrame.onload = function()
{
new_iFrame_doc = (new_iFrame.contentWindow || new_iFrame.contentDocument);
if(new_iFrame_doc.document)new_iFrame_doc=new_iFrame_doc.document;
new_iFrame_body = new_iFrame_doc.body;
if(new_iFrame_body.innerHTML != 'Loaded?')
{
//The world explodes!!!
alert('you just blew up the world! Way to go!');
}
else
{
alert('wow, you did it! Way to go!');
}
};
}
If that doesn't work for you, how about a transparent modification of the original code? Compile it with Javascript Strands and use the built-in futures support to handle this. Note that Javascript 1.7 also supports continuations, but would require changing the code manually to use them.

Another solution that may not be applicable, depending on how much you have simplified the original code. You could set an onload handler, then throw an error, then call unChangeableFunction in your onload handler:
function onlyThingYouCanChange(objectToAppendIFrameTo)
{
// using global variable func_called
if (!func_called) {
func_called = true;
var iframe=document.createElement('iframe');
iframe.src = 'blank_frame.html';
iframe.id = 'myIframe';
iframe.onload = function() {
unChangeableFunction();
};
objectToAppendIFrameTo.appendChild(iframe);
throw new Error('not an error');
} else {
return document.getElementById('myIframe');
}
}
This function (like unChangeableFunction) will be called twice: once in the first instance, then again when the onload handler is triggered. The two different pathways reflect this.
Again, this is hacky, and a definite abuse of JS's error functionality.

you can use cookie and setTimeout like that:
in blank_frame.html add a script:
<script type="text/javascript">
function deleteCookie(cookie_name)
{
var cookie_date=new Date();
cookie_date.setTime(cookie_date.getTime()-1);
document.cookie=cookie_name+="=;expires="+cookie_date.toGMTString();
}
function setCookie(name,value,expires,path,domain,secure){
document.cookie=name+"="+escape(value)+((expires)?"; expires="+expires.toGMTString():"")+((path)?"; path="+path:"")+((domain)?"; domain="+domain:"")+((secure)?"; secure":"");
}
window.onload=function(){
setCookie('iframe_loaded','yes',false,'/',false,false);
}
</script>
Basically you're adding a cookie iframe_loaded with value yes.
IMO it's better to remove the cookie as you need to do the same if you'll reload the page.
You can as well set the domain in setCookie function call.
Now in main file we'll use setTimeout with function that will check if the cookie exists, if it does then the function will return iframe like in your code:
function onlyThingYouCanChange(objectToAppendIFrameTo)
{
function get_cookie(cookie_name){
var results = document.cookie.match('(^|;) ?'+cookie_name+'=([^;]*)(;|$)');
return results?unescape(results[2]):null;
}
function deleteCookie(cookie_name){
var cookie_date=new Date();
cookie_date.setTime(cookie_date.getTime()-1);
document.cookie=cookie_name+="=;expires="+cookie_date.toGMTString();
}
iFrameLoaded = false;
iframe=document.createElement('iframe');
iframe.onload = new Function('iFrameLoaded = true');
iframe.src = 'blank_frame.html'; //Must use an HTML doc on the server because there is a very specific DOM structure that must be maintained.
objectToAppendIFrameTo.appendChild(iframe);
var it = 0;
function checkiframe(){
if(get_cookie('iframe_loaded')=="yes"){
alert('iframe loaded');
deleteCookie('iframe_loaded');
return iframe;
}else{
setTimeout(checkiframe,1000);
}
}
checkiframe();
}
As a failsafe cookie is being deleted in this file as well.
Hopefully that will give you something to work with :)
Cheers
G.