I'm writing some Javascript that interacts with library code that I don't own, and can't (reasonably) change. It creates Javascript timeouts used for showing the next question in a series of time-limited questions. This isn't real code because it is obfuscated beyond all hope. Here's what the library is doing:
....
// setup a timeout to go to the next question based on user-supplied time
var t = questionTime * 1000
test.currentTimeout = setTimeout( showNextQuestion(questions[i+1]), t );
I want to put a progress bar onscreen that fills towards questionTime * 1000 by interrogating the timer created by setTimeout. The only problem is, there seems to be no way to do this. Is there a getTimeout function that I'm missing? The only information on Javascript timeouts that I can find is related only to creation via setTimeout( function, time) and deletion via clearTimeout( id ).
I'm looking for a function that returns either the time remaining before a timeout fires, or the time elapsed after a timeout has been called. My progress bar code looks like this:
var timeleft = getTimeout( test.currentTimeout ); // I don't know how to do this
var $bar = $('.control .bar');
while ( timeleft > 1 ) {
$bar.width(timeleft / test.defaultQuestionTime * 1000);
}
tl;dr: How do I find the time remaining before a javascript setTimeout()?
Here's the solution I'm using now. I went through the library section that's in charge of tests, and unscrambled the code (terrible, and against my permissions).
// setup a timeout to go to the next question based on user-supplied time
var t = questionTime * 1000
test.currentTimeout = mySetTimeout( showNextQuestion(questions[i+1]), t );
and here's my code:
// wrapper for setTimeout
function mySetTimeout( func, timeout ) {
timeouts[ n = setTimeout( func, timeout ) ] = {
start: new Date().getTime(),
end: new Date().getTime() + timeout
t: timeout
}
return n;
}
This works pretty spot-on in any browser that isn't IE 6. Even the original iPhone, where I expected things to get asynchronous.
Just for the record, there is a way to get the time left in node.js:
var timeout = setTimeout(function() {}, 3600 * 1000);
setInterval(function() {
console.log('Time left: '+getTimeLeft(timeout)+'s');
}, 2000);
function getTimeLeft(timeout) {
return Math.ceil((timeout._idleStart + timeout._idleTimeout - Date.now()) / 1000);
}
Prints:
$ node test.js
Time left: 3599s
Time left: 3597s
Time left: 3595s
Time left: 3593s
This doesn't seem to work in firefox through, but since node.js is javascript, I thought this remark might be helpful for people looking for the node solution.
EDIT: I actually think I made an even better one: https://stackoverflow.com/a/36389263/2378102
I wrote this function and I use it a lot:
function timer(callback, delay) {
var id, started, remaining = delay, running
this.start = function() {
running = true
started = new Date()
id = setTimeout(callback, remaining)
}
this.pause = function() {
running = false
clearTimeout(id)
remaining -= new Date() - started
}
this.getTimeLeft = function() {
if (running) {
this.pause()
this.start()
}
return remaining
}
this.getStateRunning = function() {
return running
}
this.start()
}
Make a timer:
a = new timer(function() {
// What ever
}, 3000)
So if you want the time remaining just do:
a.getTimeLeft()
If you can't modify the library code, you'll need to redefine setTimeout to suit your purposes. Here's an example of what you could do:
(function () {
var nativeSetTimeout = window.setTimeout;
window.bindTimeout = function (listener, interval) {
function setTimeout(code, delay) {
var elapsed = 0,
h;
h = window.setInterval(function () {
elapsed += interval;
if (elapsed < delay) {
listener(delay - elapsed);
} else {
window.clearInterval(h);
}
}, interval);
return nativeSetTimeout(code, delay);
}
window.setTimeout = setTimeout;
setTimeout._native = nativeSetTimeout;
};
}());
window.bindTimeout(function (t) {console.log(t + "ms remaining");}, 100);
window.setTimeout(function () {console.log("All done.");}, 1000);
This is not production code, but it should put you on the right track. Note that you can only bind one listener per timeout. I haven't done extensive testing with this, but it works in Firebug.
A more robust solution would use the same technique of wrapping setTimeout, but instead use a map from the returned timeoutId to listeners to handle multiple listeners per timeout. You might also consider wrapping clearTimeout so you can detach your listener if the timeout is cleared.
Server side Node.js specific
None of the above really worked for me, and after inspecting the timeout object it looked like everything was relative to when the process started. The following worked for me:
myTimer = setTimeout(function a(){console.log('Timer executed')},15000);
function getTimeLeft(timeout){
console.log(Math.ceil((timeout._idleStart + timeout._idleTimeout)/1000 - process.uptime()));
}
setInterval(getTimeLeft,1000,myTimer);
Output:
14
...
3
2
1
Timer executed
-0
-1
...
node -v
v9.11.1
Edited output for brevity, but this basic function gives a approximate time until execution or since execution. As others mention, none of this will be exact due to the way node processes, but if I want to suppress a request that was run less than 1 minute ago, and I stored the timer, I don't see why this wouldn't work as a quick check. Could be interesting to juggle objects with refreshtimer in 10.2+.
Javascript's event stacks don't operate how you would think.
When a timeout event is created, it is added to the event queue, but other events may take priority while that event is being fired, delay the execution time and postponing runtime.
Example: You create a timeout with a delay of 10 seconds to alert something to the screen. It will be added to the event stack and will be executed after all current events are fired (causing some delay). Then, when the timeout is processed, the browser still continues to capture other events add them to the stack, which causes further delays in the processing. If the user clicks, or does a lot of ctrl+typing, their events take priority over the current stack. Your 10 seconds can turn into 15 seconds, or longer.
That being said, there are many ways to fake how much time has passed. One way is to execute a setInterval right after you add the setTimeout to the stack.
Example: Perform a settimeout with a 10 second delay (store that delay in a global). Then perform a setInterval that runs every second to subtract 1 from the delay and output the delay remaining. Because of how the event stack can influence actual time (described above), this still won't be accurate, but does give a count.
In short, there is no real way to get the remaining time. There are only ways to try and convey an estimate to the user.
A quicker, easier way:
tmo = 1000;
start = performance.now();
setTimeout(function(){
foo();
},tmo);
You can get the time remaining with:
timeLeft = tmo - (performance.now() - start);
I stopped by here looking for this answer, but was overthinking my problem. If you are here because you just need to keep track of time while you're setTimeout is in progress, here's another way to do it:
var focusTime = parseInt(msg.time) * 1000
setTimeout(function() {
alert('Nice Job Heres 5 Schrute bucks')
clearInterval(timerInterval)
}, focusTime)
var timerInterval = setInterval(function(){
focusTime -= 1000
initTimer(focusTime / 1000)
}, 1000);
You can modify setTimeout to store each timeout's end time in a map and create a function called getTimeout to get the time left for a timeout with a certain id.
This was super's solution, but I modified it to use slightly less memory
let getTimeout = (() => { // IIFE
let _setTimeout = setTimeout, // Reference to the original setTimeout
map = {}; // Map of all timeouts with their end times
setTimeout = (callback, delay) => { // Modify setTimeout
let id = _setTimeout(callback, delay); // Run the original, and store the id
map[id] = Date.now() + delay; // Store the end time
return id; // Return the id
};
return (id) => { // The actual getTimeout function
// If there was no timeout with that id, return NaN, otherwise, return the time left clamped to 0
return map[id] ? Math.max(map[id] - Date.now(), 0) : NaN;
}
})();
Usage:
// go home in 4 seconds
let redirectTimeout = setTimeout(() => {
window.location.href = "/index.html";
}, 4000);
// display the time left until the redirect
setInterval(() => {
document.querySelector("#countdown").innerHTML = `Time left until redirect ${getTimeout(redirectTimeout)}`;
},1);
Here's a minified version of this getTimeout IIFE:
let getTimeout=(()=>{let t=setTimeout,e={};return setTimeout=((a,o)=>{let u=t(a,o);return e[u]=Date.now()+o,u}),t=>e[t]?Math.max(e[t]-Date.now(),0):NaN})();
I hope this is as useful to you as it was for me! :)
No, but you can have your own setTimeout/setInterval for animation in your function.
Say your question looks like this:
function myQuestion() {
// animate the progress bar for 1 sec
animate( "progressbar", 1000 );
// do the question stuff
// ...
}
And your animation will be handled by these 2 functions:
function interpolate( start, end, pos ) {
return start + ( pos * (end - start) );
}
function animate( dom, interval, delay ) {
interval = interval || 1000;
delay = delay || 10;
var start = Number(new Date());
if ( typeof dom === "string" ) {
dom = document.getElementById( dom );
}
function step() {
var now = Number(new Date()),
elapsed = now - start,
pos = elapsed / interval,
value = ~~interpolate( 0, 500, pos ); // 0-500px (progress bar)
dom.style.width = value + "px";
if ( elapsed < interval )
setTimeout( step, delay );
}
setTimeout( step, delay );
}
If anyone's looking back on this. I've come out with a timeout and interval manager that can get you the time left in a timeout or interval as well as do some other stuff. I'll be adding to it to make it more nifty and more accurate, but it seems to work fairly well as is (although I have some more ideas to make it even more accurate):
https://github.com/vhmth/Tock
Question has already been answered but I will add my bit. It just occured to me.
Use setTimeout in recursion as follows:
var count = -1;
function beginTimer()
{
console.log("Counting 20 seconds");
count++;
if(count <20)
{
console.log(20-count+"seconds left");
setTimeout(beginTimer,2000);
}
else
{
endTimer();
}
}
function endTimer()
{
console.log("Time is finished");
}
I guess the code is self explanatory
Check this one:
class Timer {
constructor(fun,delay) {
this.timer=setTimeout(fun, delay)
this.stamp=new Date()
}
get(){return ((this.timer._idleTimeout - (new Date-this.stamp))/1000) }
clear(){return (this.stamp=null, clearTimeout(this.timer))}
}
Make a timer:
let smtg = new Timer(()=>{do()}, 3000})
Get remain:
smth.get()
Clear timeout
smth.clear()
(function(){
window.activeCountdowns = [];
window.setCountdown = function (code, delay, callback, interval) {
var timeout = delay;
var timeoutId = setTimeout(function(){
clearCountdown(timeoutId);
return code();
}, delay);
window.activeCountdowns.push(timeoutId);
setTimeout(function countdown(){
var key = window.activeCountdowns.indexOf(timeoutId);
if (key < 0) return;
timeout -= interval;
setTimeout(countdown, interval);
return callback(timeout);
}, interval);
return timeoutId;
};
window.clearCountdown = function (timeoutId) {
clearTimeout(timeoutId);
var key = window.activeCountdowns.indexOf(timeoutId);
if (key < 0) return;
window.activeCountdowns.splice(key, 1);
};
})();
//example
var t = setCountdown(function () {
console.log('done');
}, 15000, function (i) {
console.log(i / 1000);
}, 1000);
For anyone in need of a hook, check this out - should be pretty self explanatory.
Note that elapsed is an internal state variable that if passed outside of the hook will be incorrect!
import { useEffect, useRef, useState } from 'react';
const useTimeout = (callback, duration, renderDuration = 5) => {
const ref = useRef<any>(null);
const [timeInfo, setTimeInfo] = useState<{
start: number;
elapsed: number;
percentComplete: number;
}>({
start: null,
elapsed: 0,
percentComplete: 0
});
useEffect(() => {
return () => {
if (ref.current) {
clearTimeout(ref.current);
ref.current = null;
}
};
}, []);
useEffect(() => {
setTimeout(() => {
if (ref.current == null) return;
setTimeInfo((prev) => {
const elapsed = Date.now() - prev.start + prev.elapsed;
if (ref.current == null) return prev;
return {
start: prev.start,
elapsed: prev.elapsed,
percentComplete: (elapsed / duration) * 100
};
});
}, renderDuration);
}, [timeInfo]);
return {
percentComplete: timeInfo.percentComplete,
isTimerRunning: ref.current != null,
startTimeout: () => {
if (ref.current != null) return;
setTimeInfo((prev) => ({ ...prev, start: Date.now() }));
ref.current = setTimeout(callback, duration - timeInfo.elapsed);
},
stopTimeout: () => {
if (ref.current) {
clearTimeout(ref.current);
ref.current = null;
}
setTimeInfo((prev) => {
const elapsed = Date.now() - prev.start + prev.elapsed;
return {
start: prev.start,
elapsed: elapsed,
percentComplete: (elapsed / duration) * 100
};
});
},
resetTimeout: () => {
if (ref.current) {
ref.current = null;
clearTimeout(ref.current);
}
setTimeInfo({ start: null, elapsed: 0, percentComplete: 0 });
},
restartTimeout: () => {
if (ref.current) {
ref.current = null;
clearTimeout(ref.current);
}
setTimeInfo({ start: Date.now(), elapsed: 0, percentComplete: 0 });
ref.current = setTimeout(callback, duration);
}
};
};
export default useTimeout;
Related
I want to be able to call setInterval (or something similar) at two different lengths, alternating.
For example, running a function after 5 seconds, then 1 second, then 5 seconds again, and so on.
Is this possible? I tried a function that alternates the value, but it didn't seem to work.
let num = 5000
function alternateNum() {
if (num === 5000) { num = 1000 }
else { num = 5000 }
}
setInterval(() => {
// ...
alternateNum()
}, num);
JS timers have a very complicated history.
Using a recursive setTimeout invocation is a simple and elegant solution as long (as your runtime implements tail call optimization).
Separate from the issue of recursion is the issue of timer drift. This is covered in the YouTube video JavaScript counters the hard way - HTTP 203 if you'd like an accessible introduction.
In many JS engines (e.g. V8) setInterval will handle drift correction for you, so there's actually an advantage to using it over recursively invoking setTimeout. (Check the millisecond timestamps in the console messages in the snippet below to verify this.)
In order to determine the constant interval argument you'll need for setInterval, you'll need to find the greatest common factor of your delay durations. Once you have this value, you can use it as the base interval delay, and keep track of your interval state to determine whether you should switch to the next interval delay, run your other code, etc. Here's a minimal example:
const durations = [1000, 5000];
// If you can't determine this in advance and use a constant value,
// then you can calculate it at runtime using a function:
const gcf = 1000; // or const gcf = findGreatestCommonFactor(durations);
let durationIndex = 0;
let elapsed = 0;
function update () {
elapsed += gcf;
const ready = elapsed === durations[durationIndex];
if (ready) {
elapsed = 0;
durationIndex = (durationIndex + 1) % durations.length;
}
return ready;
}
setInterval(() => {
const ready = update();
if (!ready) return;
// Do your interval task, for example:
console.log('tick');
}, gcf);
The problem with setInterval() is that the time is taken into account just once. You can use setTimeout() with recursion instead:
function doAction(flipFlop) {
setTimeout(() => {
console.log(flipFlop ? 'flip' : 'flop');
doAction(!flipFlop);
// do some other action...
}, flipFlop ? 1000 : 3000);
}
doAction(true);
Watch out though if you have a long running process, this recursion gets deeper and deeper.
I think this method is the easiest:
setInterval(() => {
console.log("first");
setTimeout(() => console.log("second"), 750);
}, 2000);
This creates an interval that alternates between 1250 and 750 milliseconds.
The problem with your code
let num = 5000
function alternateNum() {
if (num === 5000) { num = 1000 }
else { num === 5000 }
}
setInterval(() => {
// ...
alternateNum()
}, num);
The last few lines (the setInterval) call are only getting called once with the initial value of num and thus any future changes to num won't be reflected in the setTimeout call.
How to fix it
You should use setTimeout within the function that has your code and call your function recursively:
const doStuff = (time = 1000) => {
// Your code here
// generate the next time to wait
const nextTime = time === 5000 ? 1000 : 5000;
// call the function again after waiting `time` milliseconds
setInterval(() => doStuff(nextTime), time);
}
Then you would call doStuff to start it. If you wanted to start it immediately with the next one happening after 1 second you could do:
doStuff();
Or if you wanted to call it after 5 seconds with the next one happening one second after that:
setTimeout(doStuff, 5000);
The difference here compared to your code is that the variable that represents the time is being used over and over again as it changes instead of just once on initial code execution.
I have a Fitbit app and want to write javascript code where every 100 times addEventListener is called, I want the app to take a break for 10 seconds by using setTimeout functionality. The 10 second break will make sure the Fitbit OS does not crash the app. I have the following so far but after the 100 times of addEventListener, there is no 10 second break; where might be the problem?
var i = 0;
function sendmessage() {
if (Accelerometer) {
const accel = new Accelerometer({ frequency: 1 });
accel.addEventListener("reading", () => {
setTimeout(function () {
console.log( `ts: ${accel.timestamp}, \
x: ${accel.x}, \
y: ${accel.y}, \
z: ${accel.z}` );
i++;
console.log(i);
if (i%100 == 0) {
sendmessage();
}
},10000)
You are adding a new event listener every time you call sendMessage(). That is likely what is causing performance issues.
To do what you suggest regarding taking a break you want to store a reference to the setTimeout and check if it is active
Something like:
function sendmessage() {
let timer = null;
if (Accelerometer) {
const accel = new Accelerometer({
frequency: 1
});
accel.addEventListener("reading", () => {
if (i % 100 == 0 && !timer) {
// do something with the data here
// then set a timeout
timer = setTimeout(function() {
// reset the variable
timer = null;
}, 10000)
}
})
}
}
I need to modify existing slider. Its slides now have differing data-seconds added to it and need be active that long. Previously I had:
var slidePause = 10;
function startSlideBanner() {
bannerTimer = setInterval(nextSlide, slidePause * 1000);
}
startSlideBanner();
Which worked infinitely well. Now I would need to update slidePause variable every iteration. Looking for an example if its possible.
No: You cannot do it with setInterval. Once it is set, it may only be cancelled.
What you can do however, is use setTimeout to achieve your goals. While this can be done recursively, I prefer to take advantage of promises to do it iteratively:
const wait = ms => new Promise(res => setTimeout(res, ms));
let slidePause = 10;
async function startSlideBanner() {
while(true) {
await wait(slidePause * 1000);
nextSlide();
// Example: Double the time for each slide
slidePause = slidePause * 2;
}
}
startSlideBanner();
One of the problems with setInterval() is that JavaScript's single threaded nature can result in uneven periods between the setInterval() code being fired. To avoid this, run setInterval() at a faster rate, and calculate the time passed to determine whether an action should be taken.
If you make the calculation for time passed dependent on a variable you can change the effective rate at which the event occurs.
function nextSlide(period){
console.log("Next Slide in "+period);
}
function VariableTimer(period, startImmediately = true) {
this.period = period;
self = this;
this.startTime = startImmediately?0:Date.now();
this.time = setInterval(function(){
if (Date.now()-self.startTime > self.period*1000) {
self.startTime = Date.now();
nextSlide(self.period);
}
}, 100); // Run setInterval at 100ms intervals.
this.stop = function(){
clearInterval(self.time);
}
}
let timer = new VariableTimer(10);
// Change the timer period like this
// timer.period = 5;
// After 20 seconds switch to 5 second intervals
setTimeout(function(){timer.period = 5;},20000);
// After 40 seconds, stop the timer.
setTimeout(function(){timer.stop();console.log("timer stopped")}, 40000);
I'm trying to create a function that starts and stops a timer. The starting is always on the click of a button, but the stopping can be due to the timer running down or the function being called again from another function.
This is what I have so far. Works perfect for what you see but I cannot figure out how to incorporate clearInterval() so that it stops when the game is won. The functioning calling timerCountdown is located in a different js file. I've read answers to similar questions but they are all seem to be doing it a little differently to where I can't make it work for my case
I do realize that I need to call clearInterval(count) but I don't know how to incorporate this into the function itself.
const timerCountdown = () => {
let count = setInterval(() => {
let timeLeft = timer.innerHTML
if (timeLeft > 0) {
timer.innerHTML = timeLeft - 1
} else {
gameOverMessage()
}
}, 1000)
}
You need to push the interval id in a global variable. Like that you can use another function to stop the interval when you want.
Like
let intervalId; // define `count` globaly
let timer = document.getElementById('timer')
const timerStop = () => {
clearInterval(intervalId)
}
const timerRestart = () => {
timerStop()
timer.innerHTML = 100;
}
const timerStart = () => {
timerStop(); // Stop timer by security, e.g. if you call `timerStart()` multiple times
intervalId = setInterval(() => {
let timeLeft = timer.innerHTML;
if (+timeLeft > 0) {
timer.innerHTML = +timeLeft - 1
} else {
timerRestart();
gameOverMessage()
}
}, 1000)
}
<div id="timer">100</div>
<div>
<button onclick="timerStart()">Start</button>
<button onclick="timerStop()">Pause</button>
<button onclick="timerRestart()">Restart</button>
</div>
setInterval makes a best effort to space the running of the callback according to the interval you specify. The thing is: in a game, what you actually want is the current state of the world to be printed to the screen in smooth and timely fashion. This is different to the behavior of setInterval, which knows nothing about the screen and is blindly called repeatedly.
For example: if you kick-off setInterval(foo, 100) for your game in a browser tab, and then navigate to another tab in your browser, wait ten seconds and then return to your game, your foo callback will be invoked about a hundred times in rapid succession as the queued callbacks are "drained". It is highly unlikely you want this behavior.
requestAnimationFrame is a better solution for this, because it is only called when (shortly before) your game is rendered - which is what you want.
In the following code a timer object is created by createTimer. The timer has start, stop and toggle methods.
The start method records when it was invoked and triggers requestAnimationFrame, supplying a callback called tick. Every time a tick occurs, we run some logic to see which (if any) callback to invoke.
If the time elapsed is greater than or equal to the duration of the timer, then the onTimeout callback is invoked and the timer is stopped.
If the time elapsed is smaller than the duration, but greater than or equal to the interval period, then we update the lastInterval and invoke the onInterval callback.
Otherwise we simply cue up another tick of the timer.
The stop method simply uses the request animation ID to cancel the timer with cancelAnimationFrame.
function createTimer() {
let rafId = null
function start({duration = 10000, interval = 1000, onInterval, onTimeout, onStop, startTime=performance.now(), lastInterval = startTime}) {
function tick(now=performance.now()) {
const elapsed = now - startTime
if (elapsed >= duration) {
cancelAnimationFrame(rafId)
rafId = null
return onTimeout()
}
if ((now - lastInterval) >= interval) {
lastInterval = now
onInterval({
duration,
elapsed
})
}
rafId = requestAnimationFrame(tick)
}
rafId = requestAnimationFrame(tick)
}
function stop() {
cancelAnimationFrame(rafId)
rafId = null
return onStop()
}
function toggle(...args) {
rafId ? stop() : start(...args)
}
const timer = {
start,
stop,
toggle
}
return timer
}
const timer = createTimer()
const onInterval = ({duration, elapsed})=>console.log(`Remaining: ${((duration - elapsed)/1000).toFixed(0)}`)
const onTimeout = ()=>console.log('Timed out.')
const onStop = ()=>console.log('Manually stopped.')
document.getElementById('btn').addEventListener('click', () => timer.toggle({
onInterval,
onTimeout,
onStop
}))
<button id="btn">Toggle Timer</button>
You could take a global variable intervalId and clear the interval timer, if won or if no time is avaliable.
var intervalId;
const timerCountdown = () => {
intervalId = setInterval(() => {
let timeLeft = timer.innerHTML
if (timeLeft > 0) {
timer.innerHTML = timeLeft - 1
} else {
clearInterval(intervalId);
gameOverMessage();
}
}, 1000)
},
won = () => {
clearInterval(intervalId);
// additional code
};
Using setTimeout() it is possible to launch a function at a specified time:
setTimeout(function, 60000);
But what if I would like to launch the function multiple times? Every time a time interval passes, I would like to execute the function (every 60 seconds, let's say).
If you don't care if the code within the timer may take longer than your interval, use setInterval():
setInterval(function, delay)
That fires the function passed in as first parameter over and over.
A better approach is, to use setTimeout along with a self-executing anonymous function:
(function(){
// do some stuff
setTimeout(arguments.callee, 60000);
})();
that guarantees, that the next call is not made before your code was executed. I used arguments.callee in this example as function reference. It's a better way to give the function a name and call that within setTimeout because arguments.callee is deprecated in ecmascript 5.
use the
setInterval(function, 60000);
EDIT : (In case if you want to stop the clock after it is started)
Script section
<script>
var int=self.setInterval(function, 60000);
</script>
and HTML Code
<!-- Stop Button -->
Stop
A better use of jAndy's answer to implement a polling function that polls every interval seconds, and ends after timeout seconds.
function pollFunc(fn, timeout, interval) {
var startTime = (new Date()).getTime();
interval = interval || 1000;
(function p() {
fn();
if (((new Date).getTime() - startTime ) <= timeout) {
setTimeout(p, interval);
}
})();
}
pollFunc(sendHeartBeat, 60000, 1000);
UPDATE
As per the comment, updating it for the ability of the passed function to stop the polling:
function pollFunc(fn, timeout, interval) {
var startTime = (new Date()).getTime();
interval = interval || 1000,
canPoll = true;
(function p() {
canPoll = ((new Date).getTime() - startTime ) <= timeout;
if (!fn() && canPoll) { // ensures the function exucutes
setTimeout(p, interval);
}
})();
}
pollFunc(sendHeartBeat, 60000, 1000);
function sendHeartBeat(params) {
...
...
if (receivedData) {
// no need to execute further
return true; // or false, change the IIFE inside condition accordingly.
}
}
In jQuery you can do like this.
function random_no(){
var ran=Math.random();
jQuery('#random_no_container').html(ran);
}
window.setInterval(function(){
/// call your function here
random_no();
}, 6000); // Change Interval here to test. For eg: 5000 for 5 sec
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.1.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
<div id="random_no_container">
Hello. Here you can see random numbers after every 6 sec
</div>
setInterval(fn,time)
is the method you're after.
You can simply call setTimeout at the end of the function. This will add it again to the event queue. You can use any kind of logic to vary the delay values. For example,
function multiStep() {
// do some work here
blah_blah_whatever();
var newtime = 60000;
if (!requestStop) {
setTimeout(multiStep, newtime);
}
}
Use window.setInterval(func, time).
A good example where to subscribe a setInterval(), and use a clearInterval() to stop the forever loop:
function myTimer() {
}
var timer = setInterval(myTimer, 5000);
call this line to stop the loop:
clearInterval(timer);
Call a Javascript function every 2 second continuously for 10 second.
var intervalPromise;
$scope.startTimer = function(fn, delay, timeoutTime) {
intervalPromise = $interval(function() {
fn();
var currentTime = new Date().getTime() - $scope.startTime;
if (currentTime > timeoutTime){
$interval.cancel(intervalPromise);
}
}, delay);
};
$scope.startTimer(hello, 2000, 10000);
hello(){
console.log("hello");
}
function random(number) {
return Math.floor(Math.random() * (number+1));
}
setInterval(() => {
const rndCol = 'rgb(' + random(255) + ',' + random(255) + ',' + random(255) + ')';//rgb value (0-255,0-255,0-255)
document.body.style.backgroundColor = rndCol;
}, 1000);
<script src="test.js"></script>
it changes background color in every 1 second (written as 1000 in JS)
// example:
// checkEach(1000, () => {
// if(!canIDoWorkNow()) {
// return true // try again after 1 second
// }
//
// doWork()
// })
export function checkEach(milliseconds, fn) {
const timer = setInterval(
() => {
try {
const retry = fn()
if (retry !== true) {
clearInterval(timer)
}
} catch (e) {
clearInterval(timer)
throw e
}
},
milliseconds
)
}
here we console natural number 0 to ......n (next number print in console every 60 sec.) , using setInterval()
var count = 0;
function abc(){
count ++;
console.log(count);
}
setInterval(abc,60*1000);
I see that it wasn't mentioned here if you need to pass a parameter to your function on repeat setTimeout(myFunc(myVal), 60000); will cause an error of calling function before the previous call is completed.
Therefore, you can pass the parameter like
setTimeout(function () {
myFunc(myVal);
}, 60000)
For more detailed information you can see the JavaScript garden.
Hope it helps somebody.
I favour calling a function that contains a loop function that calls a setTimeout on itself at regular intervals.
function timer(interval = 1000) {
function loop(count = 1) {
console.log(count);
setTimeout(loop, interval, ++count);
}
loop();
}
timer();
There are 2 ways to call-
setInterval(function (){ functionName();}, 60000);
setInterval(functionName, 60000);
above function will call on every 60 seconds.