We Keep Coding

JSON parse a decodedURI failed? [duplicate]

What is the difference between the JavaScript functions decodeURIComponent and decodeURI?

To explain the difference between these two let me explain the difference between encodeURI and encodeURIComponent.
The main difference is that:
The encodeURI function is intended for use on the full URI.
The encodeURIComponent function is intended to be used on .. well .. URI components that is
any part that lies between separators (; / ? : # & = + $ , #).
So, in encodeURIComponent these separators are encoded also because they are regarded as text and not special characters.
Now back to the difference between the decode functions, each function decodes strings generated by its corresponding encode counterpart taking care of the semantics of the special characters and their handling.

encodeURIComponent/decodeURIComponent() is almost always the pair you want to use, for concatenating together and splitting apart text strings in URI parts.
encodeURI in less common, and misleadingly named: it should really be called fixBrokenURI. It takes something that's nearly a URI, but has invalid characters such as spaces in it, and turns it into a real URI. It has a valid use in fixing up invalid URIs from user input, and it can also be used to turn an IRI (URI with bare Unicode characters in) into a plain URI (using %-escaped UTF-8 to encode the non-ASCII).
Where encodeURI should really be named fixBrokenURI(), decodeURI() could equally be called potentiallyBreakMyPreviouslyWorkingURI(). I can think of no valid use for it anywhere; avoid.

js> s = "http://www.example.com/string with + and ? and & and spaces";
http://www.example.com/string with + and ? and & and spaces
js> encodeURI(s)
http://www.example.com/string%20with%20+%20and%20?%20and%20&%20and%20spaces
js> encodeURIComponent(s)
http%3A%2F%2Fwww.example.com%2Fstring%20with%20%2B%20and%20%3F%20and%20%26%20and%20spaces
Looks like encodeURI produces a "safe" URI by encoding spaces and some other (e.g. nonprintable) characters, whereas encodeURIComponent additionally encodes the colon and slash and plus characters, and is meant to be used in query strings. The encoding of + and ? and & is of particular importance here, as these are special chars in query strings.

As I had the same question, but didn't find the answer here, I made some tests in order to figure out what the difference actually is.
I did this, since I need the encoding for something, which is not URL/URI related.
encodeURIComponent("A") returns "A", it does not encode "A" to "%41"
decodeURIComponent("%41") returns "A".
encodeURI("A") returns "A", it does not encode "A" to "%41"
decodeURI("%41") returns "A".
-That means both can decode alphanumeric characters, even though they did not encode them. However...
encodeURIComponent("&") returns "%26".
decodeURIComponent("%26") returns "&".
encodeURI("&") returns "&".
decodeURI("%26") returns "%26".
Even though encodeURIComponent does not encode all characters, decodeURIComponent can decode any value between %00 and %7F.
Note: It appears that if you try to decode a value above %7F (unless it's a unicode value), then your script will fail with an "URI error".

encodeURIComponent()
Converts the input into a URL-encoded
string
encodeURI()
URL-encodes the input, but
assumes a full URL is given, so
returns a valid URL by not encoding
the protocol (e.g. http://) and
host name (e.g.
www.stackoverflow.com).
decodeURIComponent() and decodeURI() are the opposite of the above

decodeURIComponent will decode URI special markers such as &, ?, #, etc, decodeURI will not.

encodeURIComponent
Not Escaped:
A-Z a-z 0-9 - _ . ! ~ * ' ( )
encodeURI()
Not Escaped:
A-Z a-z 0-9 ; , / ? : # & = + $ - _ . ! ~ * ' ( ) #
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/encodeURIComponent
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/encodeURI

Encode URI:
The encodeURI() method does not encodes:
, / ? : # & = + $ * #
Example
URI: https://my test.asp?name=ståle&car=saab
Encoded URI: https://my%20test.asp?name=st%C3%A5le&car=saab
Encode URI Component:
The encodeURIComponent() method also encodes:
, / ? : # & = + $ #
Example
URI: https://my test.asp?name=ståle&car=saab
Encoded URI: https%3A%2F%2Fmy%20test.asp%3Fname%3Dst%C3%A5le%26car%3Dsaab
For More: W3Schoools.com

JavaScript not decoding parameter

So from the textarea I take the shortcode %91samurai id="19"%93 it should be [samurai id="19"]:
var not_decoded_content = jQuery('[data-module_type="et_pb_text_forms_00132547"]')
.find('#et_pb_et_pb_text_form_content').html();
But when I try to decode the %91 and %93
self.content = decodeURI(not_decoded_content);
I get the error:
Uncaught URIError: URI malformed
How can i solve this problem?

The encodings are invalid. If you can't fix the whatever-system-produces-them to correctly produce %5B and %5D, then your only option is to do a replacement yourself: replace all %91 with character 91 which is '[', then replace all %93 with character 93 which is ']'.
Note that javascript String Replace as-is won't do "Replace all occurrences". If you need that, then create a loop (while it contains(...) do a replace), or search the internet for javascript replace all, you should find plenty results.
And a final note, I am used to using decodeURIComponent(...). If you can make the whatever-system-produces-them to correctly produce %5B and %5D, and you still get that error, then try using decodeURIComponent(...) instead of decodeURI(...).

The string you're trying to decode is not a URI. Use decodeURIComponent() instead.
UPDATE
Hmm, that's not actually the issue, the issues are the %91 and %93.
encodeURI('[]')
gives %5b%5d, it looks like whatever has encoded this string has used the decimal rather than hexadecimal value.
Decimal 91 = hex 5b
Decimal 93 = hex 5d
Trying again with the hex values
decodeURI('%5bsamurai id="19"%5d') == '[samurai id="19"]'

I know this is not the solution you want to see, but can you try using "%E2%80%98" for %91 and "%E2%80%9C" for %93 ?
The %91 and %93 are part of control characters which html does not like to decode (for reasons beyond me). Simply put, they're not your ordinary ASCII characters for HTML to play around with.

Javascript encodeURI() vs. PHP rawurldecode() and special characters

Encoding a string with German umlauts like ä,ü,ö,ß with Javascript encodeURI() causes a weird bug after decoding it in PHP with rawurldecode(). Although the string seems to be correctly decoded it isn't. See below example screenshots from my IDE
Also the strlen() of the - with rawurldecode() - decoded string gives more characters than it really has!
Problems occur when I need to process the decoded string, for example if I want to replace the German characters ä,ü,ö with ae, ue and oe. This can be seen in the example provided here.
I have also made an PHP fiddle where this whole weirdness can be seen.
What I've tried so far:
- utf8_decode
- iconv
- and also first two suggestions from here

This is a Unicode equivalence issue and it looks like your IDE doesnt handle multibyte strings very well.
In unicode you can represent Ü with either:
the single unicode codepoint (U+00DC) or %C3%9C in utf8
or use a capital U (U+0055) with a modifier (U+0308) or %55%CC%88 in utf8
Your GWT string uses the latter method called NFD while your one from PHP uses the first method called NFC. That's why your GWT string is 3 characters longer even though they are both valid encodings of logically identical unicode strings. Your problem is that they are not identical byte for byte in PHP.
More details about utf-8 normalisation.
If you want to do preg replacements on the strings you need to normalise them to the same form first. From your example I can see your IDE is using NFC since it's the PHP string that works. So I suggest normalising to NFC form in PHP (the default), then doing the preg_replace.
http://php.net/manual/en/normalizer.normalize.php
function cleanImageName($name)
{
$name = Normalizer::normalize( $name, Normalizer::FORM_C );
$clean = preg_replace(
Otherwise you have to do something like this which is based on this article.

what is the c# equivalent to javascript's unescape()?

I am trying to analyse some JavaScript, and one line is
var x = unescape("%u4141%u4141 ......");
with lots of characters in form %uxxxx.
I want to rewrite the JavaScript in c# but can't figure out the proper function to decode a string of characters like this. I've tried
HttpUtility.HTMLDecode("%u4141%u4141");
but this did not change these characters at all.
How can I accomplish this in c#?

You can use UrlDecode:
string decoded = HttpUtility.UrlDecode("%u4141%u4141");
decoded would then contain "䅁䅁".
As other have pointed out, changing the % to \ would work, but UrlDecode is the preferred method, since that ensures that other escaped symbols are translated correctly as well.

You need HttpUtility.UrlDecode. You shouldn't really be using escape/unescape in most cases nowadays, you should be using things like encodeURI/decodeURI/encodeURIComponent.
When are you supposed to use escape instead of encodeURI / encodeURIComponent?
This question covers the issue of why escape/unescape are a bad idea.

You can call bellow method to achieve the same effect as Javascript escape/unescape method
Microsoft.JScript.GlobalObject.unescape();
Microsoft.JScript.GlobalObject.escape();

Change the % signs to backslashes and you have a C# string literal. C# treats \uxxxx as an escape sequence, with xxxx being 4 digits.

In basic string usage you can initiate string variable in Unicode:
var someLine="\u4141";
If it is possible - replace all "%u" with "\u".

edit the web.config the following parameter:
< globalization requestEncoding="iso-8859-15" responseEncoding="utf-8" >responseHeaderEncoding="utf-8" in < system.web >

VBScript chr() appears to return wrong value

I'm trying to convert a character code to a character with chr(), but VBScript isn't giving me the value I expect. According to VBScript, character code 199 is:
�
However, when using something like Javascript's String.fromCharCode, 199 is:
Ç
The second result is what I need to get out of VBScript's chr() function. Any idea what the problem is?

Edited to reflect comments
Chr(199) returns a 2-byte character, which is being interpreted as 2 separate characters.
use ChrW(199) to return a Unicode string.
use ChrB(199) to return it as a single-byte character

Encoding is the problem. Javascript may be interpreting as latin-1; VBScript may be using a different encoding and getting confused.

The fromCharCode() takes the specified Unicode values and returns a string.
The Chr() function converts the specified ANSI character code to a character.