Is the following method wrong way of declaring namespace in Javascript? It is from the book I'm reading and doesn't seem to work in my code.
<script type="text/javascript">
var mynamespace = {};
if(Drupal.jsEnabled){
$(document).ready(mynamespace.init);
}
mynamespace.init = function() {
$("#mybutton").bind("click",function(){
alert('hello');
});
}
</script>
It looks like your code is dependent on jQuery. Make sure that is loaded before you run this script. Also, define your function before it gets called. Try this:
var mynamespace = {};
mynamespace.init = function() {
$("#mybutton").bind("click",function(){
alert('hello');
});
}
if(Drupal.jsEnabled){
$(document).ready(mynamespace.init);
}
What seems to be going wrong here is that the mynamespace.init function isn't defined at the time you are hooking it up to $(document).ready.
This should work as expected:
<script type="text/javascript">
var mynamespace = {};
mynamespace.init = function() {
$("#mybutton").bind("click",function(){
alert('hello');
});
}
if(Drupal.jsEnabled){
$(document).ready(mynamespace.init);
}
</script>
You may also consider forming it like this, as it is easier to understand (at least to me anyhow)
<script type="text/javascript">
var mynamespace = {
init : function() {
$("#mybutton").bind("click",function(){
alert('hello');
})
};
if(Drupal.jsEnabled){
$(document).ready(mynamespace.init);
}
</script>
Be careful using $(document).ready(mynamespace.init);. When executed in this way, this is no longer a reference to mynamespace, normally it would be equal to window, but jQuery do some call magic in the background to set it equal to document. It won't hurt you in this instance, but be wary of it in the future.
$(document).ready(function () {
mynamespace.init();
});
Is how I would do it.
In this case, the reason your code isn't working is that the init method of mynamespace isn't defined at the document $(document).ready(mynamespace.init) is called.
What strikes me as odd, at least working mostly in C#, is that a namespace should not directly contain code logic. In C# it can't, that is what classes are for. So for me, having an init function on a namespace is a contradiction.
Yes, you can use object as a namespace. Another way to form a namespace is to use closures:
(function(inner_variable_1, inner_variable_2) {
// define whatever here, they won't pollute namespace outside this closure
})(outer_variable_1, outer_variable_2);
Popular example is jQuery's noconflict-mode, which enables you to use $ variable in your jQuery code without making $ a global variable, thus leaving the global $ for another use.
Related
I currently have a HTML file that has one script that is declared as follows:
<script src="//ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.0.0/jquery.min.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript">
$(document).ready(function() {
code.......
var a = "hello"
});
</script>
I am trying to add another script within the HTML file that will call on this variable "a". Right now, I am doing something like this:
<script type="text/javascript">
alert(a);
</script>
But it is not alerting anything. If I replace a with a string like "hello", I do get alerted. Am I calling the variable wrong? I've tried searching for solutions but all of them say you should be able to easily call variables from another script assuming that script is declared and initialized before. Thanks.
Move the a declaration outside of the function.
E.g.,
var a;
$(document).ready(function() {
code.......
a = "hello"
});
And then later on...
alert(a);
Remember that variables are function-scoped, so if you define it inside of a function, it won't be visible outside of the function.
Update based on comments:
Because you now have a timing issue when trying to interact with the a variable, I would recommend introducing an event-bus (or some other mechanism) to coordinate on timing. Given that you're already using jQuery, you can create a simple bus as follows:
var bus = $({});
bus.on('some-event', function() {});
bus.trigger('some-event', ...);
This actually lends itself to some better code organization, too, since now you really only need the bus to be global, and you can pass data around in events, rather than a bunch of other random variables.
E.g.,
var bus = $({});
$(document).ready(function() {
var a = 'hello';
bus.trigger('some-event', { a: a });
});
And then in your other file:
bus.on('some-event', function(e, data) {
alert(data.a);
});
JSBin example (obviously not spread across multiple files, but the same principles apply).
Replace your code as
<script src="//ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.0.0/jquery.min.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript">
var a="";
$(document).ready(function() {
a = "hello";
});
</script>
Now you can access the variable a as below.
<script type="text/javascript">
alert(a);
</script>
The problem with your code was that, you was declaring the variable a inside $(document).ready() which made it local to the ready().
When you write a inside function block you make it a local variable, you can move variable declaration outside of the function block as other answer say or you can use:
$(document).ready(function() {
window.a = "hello";
});
and later:
alert(a);
In both cases you are declaring a as a global variable and that is not recommended.
I am having a lot of issues with jquery. I am managing an older application that used prototype. My new pages don't use prototype, but I am encapsulating things in jquery.noConflict just in case. This however is resulting in me being unable to share functions through different js files.
Order files are loaded:
jquery.js
jquery.commonFuncs.js
jquery.database.js
Example contents of files
commonFuncs.js
var someGlobalVar = "abc";
jQuery.noConflict()(function($){
function doStuff(x){
return x;
}
});
database.js
jQuery.noConflict()(function($){
var a = 123;
doStuff(a);
});
Error: doStuff is not defined.
I can kind of understand why encapsulating the function removes it from the global namespace. How can I add it back?
I also have no darn idea why I have to use noConflict if I do not load prototype.js If I completely remove prototype.js and remove the noConflict encapsulation, I get $ is undefined, and I don't know where to start with that. jQuery is clearly loading first. No clue.
As Madbreaks proposed, something like in the example below should work.
(Have a look in the web browser console to see that there's no error message.)
var someGlobalVar = "abc";
var myApp = {};
jQuery.noConflict()(function($){
function doStuff(x){
return x;
}
myApp.doStuff = doStuff;
});
jQuery.noConflict()(function($){
var a = 123;
//doStuff(a);
console.log(myApp.doStuff(a));
});
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.1.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
You can refactor your code like this:
var someGlobalVar = "abc";
var doStuff;
jQuery.noConflict()(function($){
doStuff = function(x){
return x;
}
});
i was exploring in the last few days how big frameworks works , how they assign their function name and it can't(?) be override , i pretty much know how framework work with anonymous function , for example they do it this way or similar version :
(function(){
var Sizzle = function (){
var x;
};
Sizzle.f = function(){
alert("!");
};
window.Sizzle = Sizzle;
})();
i still don't get few things about those huge frameworks and i hope i can find answer :
how do they assign function name and the name can't be override?
in the code above to call the function i need to write Sizzle.f() to get the function to work , but when i use jquery i don't write Jquery.show() , just show() , how do they vanish the "jquery" from "jquery.show()" function call?
by saying the name can't be override i mean , if i create function with one of the jquery functions names , the jquery function will work.
thanks in advance.
As has been shown for #2, it's really easy for BIG_NAMESPACE.Functions.doStuff to be added to anything you want.
var _ = BIG_NAMESPACE.Functions.doStuff;
_(); // runs BIG_NAMESPACE.Functions.doStuff;
As for #1:
Most libraries DO let their functions be overwritten.
It's the values that are inside of the framework's closure which are preserved, for safety reasons.
So you could do something like:
BIG_NAMESPACE.Functions.doStuff = function StealEverything() {};
(BIG_NAMESPACE.Functions.doStuff === StealEverything) // true;
But doStuff would have NO access to any of the variables hidden inside of the framework's closure.
It would also mean that until the page was reloaded, doStuff would also not work the way you want it to.
HOWEVER, in newer versions of JavaScript (ECMA5-compatible browsers), it WILL be possible to do something like what you're suggesting.
BIG_NAMESPACE = (function () {
var do_stuff = function () { console.log("doin' stuff"); },
functions = {
set doStuff (overwrite) { }
get doStuff () { return do_stuff; }
};
return { Functions : functions };
}());
Then, this will work:
BIG_NAMESPACE.Functions.doStuff(); // "doin' stuff"
BIG_NAMESPACE.Functions.doStuff = function () { console.log("ain't doin' jack"); };
BIG_NAMESPACE.Functions.doStuff(); // "doin' stuff"
However, Frameworks aren't going to use this for a LONG time.
This is not even remotely backwards compatible. Maybe in 2016...
There were defineGetter and defineSetter methods as well, but they aren't a formal part of the JavaScript language. Like innerHTML, they're things that the browser vendors put in, to make life better... ...as such, there's no real guarantee that they're going to be in any/all browsers your users have. Plus, they're deprecated, now that new browsers use the get and set constructs that other languages have.
(function(){
var jqueree = {};
jqueree.someval = 22;
jqueree.somefunc = function(){ alert(this.someval); };
window.jqueree = jqueree;
window.somefunc = function(){ jqueree.somefunc.call(jqueree); };
window.$$$ = jqueree;
})();
// all equivalent
window.somefunc();
window.jqueree.somefunc();
$$$.somefunc();
somefunc();
Answering your Questions
At the top of jQuery you'll see: var jQuery = (function() {, which creates the local function (its incomplete; the }); occurs elsewhere).
At the very end of jQuery you'll notice the following, which is how it attaches it to the global namespace:
// Expose jQuery to the global object
window.jQuery = window.$ = jQuery;
I have never seen a jQuery function called without referencing the jQuery object. I think you always need to use jQuery.show() or $.show(); however maybe you're saying you don't have to call window.jQuery.show(), which you are permitted to drop the window, since that is the default.
Using your example
(function(){
/* This is where Sizzle is defined locally, but not exposed globally */
var Sizzle = function (){
var x;
};
/* If you put "window.f = Sizzle.f = function(){" then you could *
* call f() w/o typing Sizzle.f() */
Sizzle.f = function(){
alert("!");
};
/* The following line is what makes it so you can use Sizzle elsewhere *
* on your page (it exposes it globally here) */
window.Sizzle = Sizzle;
})();
use function _name_() {} and the name is static
the simply use var $ = jQuery; to create an alias.
jQuery works this way:
Supposed you have this jQuery code:
$("#title").show();
You have three elements to that line.
$ is a javascript function
"#title" is an argument to that function
.show() is a method call
Here's how it works.
Javascript executes the function named $ and passed it an argument of "#title".
That function does it's business, finds the #title object in the DOM, creates a jQuery object, puts that DOM element into the array in the jQuery object and returns the jQuery object.
The Javascript execution engine then takes the return value from that function call (which is now a jQuery object) and looks for and executes the .show() method on that object.
The .show() method then looks at the array of DOM elements in the jQuery object and does the show operation for each DOM element.
In answer to your question, there is no .show() all by itself. It's a method on a jQuery object and, in this example, that jQuery object is returned from the $("#title") function call.
Here are two samples of code. The first one does not work and the second one does, though I'm completely at a loss as to why. Can someone explain this?
[I'm writing a simple game using a bit of jQuery to be played in a webkit browser (packaged with Titanium later).]
In the first example, Firebug tells me that "this.checkCloud" is not a function.
function Cloud(){
this.checkCloud = function(){
alert('test');
}
$("#"+this.cloudName).click(function(){
this.checkCloud();
});
}
...but then this works:
function Cloud(){
this.checkCloud = function(){
alert('test');
}
var _this = this;
$("#"+this.cloudName).click(function(){
_this.checkCloud();
});
}
This one works perfect.
Why does the first one not work? Is it because "this.checkCloud" is inside of the anonymous function?
in this example:
$("#"+this.cloudName).click(function(){
this.checkCloud();
});
this referrers to the element selected(jquery object).
what you can do is use private functions
var checkCloud = function(){
alert('test');
}
this way you can simply call it inside your anonymous function
$("#"+this.cloudName).click(function(){
checkCloud();
});
That is because the meaning of this can potentially change each time you create a new scope via a function. The meaning of this depends on how the function is invoked (and the rules can be insanely complicated). As you discovered, the easy solution is to create a second variable to which you save this in the scope where this has the expected/desired value, and then reuse the variable rather than this to refer to the same object in new function scopes where this could be different.
Try this:
function Cloud(){
this.checkCloud = function(){
alert('test');
}
var func = this.checkCloud;
$("#" + this.cloudName).click(function(){
func();
});
}
When you assign an even listener to an element, jQuery makes sure that this will refer to the element. But when you create the _this variable, you're creating a closure that jQuery couldn't mess with, even if it wanted to.
This example is a simplified version of my code. I'm still trying to grasp the new way of writing javascript (as opposed to the way 10 years ago) so thanks for your patience. I need globalVal's value to be accessible and I'm having trouble. The value is obtained from a function that is called as an argument from another method. The example is probably easier to see. Just need to be able to have access to globalvar from everywhere in the DOM. Is this possible? Thanks
<html>
<head>
<script type="text/javascript">
var globalvar;
function initialize() {
var someVariable = 5;
doSomething(someVariable, getTheVar);
}
function doSomething(someVariable, expectGlobalVar) {
//alert(someVariable);
alert(expectGlobalVar);
}
function getTheVar() {
globalVar = "test";
return globalVar;
}
</script>
<title></title>
</head>
<body onload="initialize()">
This is a test
</body>
</html>
You're mostly fine, you can directly access globalVar from any script running anywhere in the page if you declare it the way you have.
Specifically: Using var x; at page-level scope (that is, outside of any function) declares a property on the window object (it has a special feature in that it can't be deleted, but that's not important here).
var foo = 2;
window.foo = 2; // Basically the same other than the delete thing we're not worrying about here
And so:
var foo = 2;
alert(foo); // alerts "2"
alert(window.foo); // also alerts "2"
window.bar = 4;
alert(window.bar); // alerts "4"
alert(bar); // also alerts "4"
Naturally this is only true at the top level, outside of any functions. Inside functions, you're declaring something local to the function. (In essence; it's actually a lot more interesting than that.)
But since you've asked about scope, it's worth nothing that all of the other things you've defined (initialize, getTheVar, doSomething) are also globals. In general, you want to avoid putting anything in the global namespace that you can avoid putting there.
For that reason, I advocate always using a "scoping function":
(function() {
// your code here
})();
...and explicitly exporting exactly and only the things you really need to be global (by assigning them to properties on window).
In your case, you've said you need globalVar and you've also used initialize (although there are other ways to do what you're doing in initialize), so you could do this:
(function() {
var globalvar;
// Exports
window.globalVar = globalVar;
window.initialize = initialize;
// Implementation
function initialize() {
var someVariable = 5;
doSomething(someVariable, getTheVar);
}
function doSomething(someVariable, expectGlobalVar) {
//alert(someVariable);
alert(expectGlobalVar);
}
function getTheVar() {
globalVar = "test";
return globalVar;
}
})();
But you can take it further. Since you're not calling initialize until the load event of the body element, you could avoid publishing initialize. Just put your script tag at the end of the document, just before the closing </body> tag (as the YUI folks recommend), and do your initialization there:
<html>
<head>
<title>...</title>
</head>
<body>This is a test
<script type='text/javascript'>
(function() {
var globalvar;
// Initialization
initialize();
// Exports
window.globalVar = globalVar;
// Implementation
function initialize() {
var someVariable = 5;
doSomething(someVariable, getTheVar);
}
function doSomething(someVariable, expectGlobalVar) {
//alert(someVariable);
alert(expectGlobalVar);
}
function getTheVar() {
globalVar = "test";
return globalVar;
}
})();
</script>
</body>
</html>
The DOM is fully loaded and ready to go at that point.
But we can go even further if we want: We can have nothing in the global namespace if we like. If you hook up all of your handlers within your initialize function rather than using onload, onclick, and similar attributes, there's no need for globalVar to be global except to your code. (You hook up handlers after the fact by using attachEvent [on IE], addEventListener [on standards-based browsers], or better yet using a library like jQuery, Closure, Prototype, YUI, or any of several others.)
You should call function getTheVar instead of passing it:
function initialize() {
var someVariable = 5;
doSomething(someVariable, getTheVar());
}
You're doing it right.
Any variable which is declared in global scope, just like you have in the example, will be available from every scope in the window.
(BTW, declaring a global var is [almost] equivalent to window.myVar = someValue;)
The problem in your example is that you are not actually calling getTheVar on the fourth line, but rather just passing the function itself. You probably want this:
doSomething(someVariable, getTheVar());