Javascript security / cross scripting on same server - javascript

Have some Javascript that I need to work via the following:
://localhost
://servername
:/www.domainnamefortheserver.com
When I run the script from http://servername with an IFRAME referencing the domain - it does not load.
Is there a way to get the Javascript security model to recognize the server name, localhost and the domain as the same "domain"?
Thanks

If you are running on UNIX you can edit /etc/hosts to give a fake DNS entry for your server.
eg.
127.0.0.1 localhost www.domainnamefortheserver.com
Then you can always connect to it as the correct name even when it's not on the live site yet. Don't try and break the javascript security directly.
This will also work on OSX. Windows works differently, I expect.

If you are using a server-side language to generate the page, you may be able to set the security domain like so:
document.domain = $CURRENT_HOSTNAME;
So the security domain will be the domain the user requested. This is a shot in the dark, but I hope it helps nonetheless.

Use root relative URIs:
href="/foo/bar"
rather than absolute URIs:
href="http://example.com/foo/bar"
That way the document will be loaded from the same hostname.

What do you mean by
my references are to the domain name
?
If you load scripts in your page on http://servername (using <script src=''>), they will have access to everything on http://servername, even if they come from another domain.
However, if you try to make AJAX calls to the other domain, then you have a problem. You can use the trick explained by Christopher, ie making aliases to the domain.

Related

a website that is blocked from being embedded in an iFrame. I need a legal workaround that allows me to post my store on my website [duplicate]

I am developing a web page that needs to display, in an iframe, a report served by another company's SharePoint server. They are fine with this.
The page we're trying to render in the iframe is giving us X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN which causes the browser (at least IE8) to refuse to render the content in a frame.
First, is this something they can control or is it something SharePoint just does by default? If I ask them to turn this off, could they even do it?
Second, can I do something to tell the browser to ignore this http header and just render the frame?
If the 2nd company is happy for you to access their content in an IFrame then they need to take the restriction off - they can do this fairly easily in the IIS config.
There's nothing you can do to circumvent it and anything that does work should get patched quickly in a security hotfix. You can't tell the browser to just render the frame if the source content header says not allowed in frames. That would make it easier for session hijacking.
If the content is GET only you don't post data back then you could get the page server side and proxy the content without the header, but then any post back should get invalidated.
UPDATE: 2019-12-30
It seem that this tool is no longer working! [Request for update!]
UPDATE 2019-01-06: You can bypass X-Frame-Options in an <iframe> using my X-Frame-Bypass Web Component. It extends the IFrame element by using multiple CORS proxies and it was tested in the latest Firefox and Chrome.
You can use it as follows:
(Optional) Include the Custom Elements with Built-in Extends polyfill for Safari:
<script src="https://unpkg.com/#ungap/custom-elements-builtin"></script>
Include the X-Frame-Bypass JS module:
<script type="module" src="x-frame-bypass.js"></script>
Insert the X-Frame-Bypass Custom Element:
<iframe is="x-frame-bypass" src="https://example.org/"></iframe>
The X-Frame-Options header is a security feature enforced at the browser level.
If you have control over your user base (IT dept for corp app), you could try something like a greasemonkey script (if you can a) deploy greasemonkey across everyone and b) deploy your script in a shared way)...
Alternatively, you can proxy their result. Create an endpoint on your server, and have that endpoint open a connection to the target endpoint, and simply funnel traffic backwards.
Yes Fiddler is an option for me:
Open Fiddler menu > Rules > Customize Rules (this effectively edits CustomRules.js).
Find the function OnBeforeResponse
Add the following lines:
oSession.oResponse.headers.Remove("X-Frame-Options");
oSession.oResponse.headers.Add("Access-Control-Allow-Origin", "*");
Remember to save the script!
As for second question - you can use Fiddler filters to set response X-Frame-Options header manually to something like ALLOW-FROM *. But, of course, this trick will work only for you - other users still won't be able to see iframe content(if they not do the same).

transferring localstorage to another website [duplicate]

I am attempting to share data across subdomains using Safari. I would like to use an HTML5 database (specifically localStorage as my data is nothing but key-value pairs).
However, it seems as though data stored to example.com can not be accessed from sub.example.com (or vice versa). Is there any way to share a single database in this situation?
Update 2016
This library from Zendesk worked for me.
Sample:
Hub
// Config s.t. subdomains can get, but only the root domain can set and del
CrossStorageHub.init([
{origin: /\.example.com$/, allow: ['get']},
{origin: /:\/\/(www\.)?example.com$/, allow: ['get', 'set', 'del']}
]);
Note the $ for matching the end of the string. The regular expression in the above example will match origins such as valid.example.com, but not invalid.example.com.malicious.com.
Client
var storage = new CrossStorageClient('https://store.example.com/hub.html');
storage.onConnect().then(function() {
return storage.set('newKey', 'foobar');
}).then(function() {
return storage.get('existingKey', 'newKey');
}).then(function(res) {
console.log(res.length); // 2
}).catch(function(err) {
// Handle error
});
Check https://stackoverflow.com/a/39788742/5064633
There is simple way to use cross-domain anything, just create simple page that will be included as proxy iframe hosted on domain you try to access, send PostMessage to that iframe and inside iframe you do your LocalStorage database manipulation. Here is a link to article that do this with lcoalStorage. And here is demo that send message to different page in subdomain check the source code, it use iframe and PostMessage.
EDIT: New version of sysend.js library (used by above demo) use BroadcastChannel if browser support it, but still it require Iframe. Recent version also simplify using of Cross-Origin messages, you have html of the iframe in repo, that you can use (or you can use simple html file with single script tag with the lib) and in parent you just need to call one function sysend.proxy('https://example.com'); where example.com need to have proxy.html file (you can also use your own filename and different path).
Google Chrome blocks localStoage access from an iFrame in another domain by default,unless 3rd party cookie is enabled and so does Safari on iPhone...the only solution seems to be opening the parent domain on a different domain and then sending to to the Child via window.postMessage but looks ugly and shifty on phones...
Yes. This is how:
For sharing between subdomains of a given superdomain (e.g. foo.example.com vs bar.example.com vs example.com), there's a technique you can use in that situation. It can be applied to localStorage, IndexedDB, SharedWorker, BroadcastChannel, etc, all of which offer shared functionality between same-origin pages, but for some reason don't respect any modification to document.domain that would let them use the superdomain as their origin directly.
NOTE: This technique depends on setting document.domain to allow direct communication between iframes on different subdomains. That functionality has now been deprecated. (As of April 2021 it continues to work in all major browsers however. From Chrome v109 the feature will be disabled unless an Origin-Agent-Cluster: ?0 header is also sent.)
NOTE: Be aware that this technique removes the same-origin defences that block malicious script on a subdomain from affecting the main-domain window, or visa versa, potentially broadening the attack surface for XSS attacks. There are other security implications for shared hosting as well - see the MDN document.domain page for details.
(1) Pick one "main" domain to for the data to belong to: i.e. either https://foo.example.com or https://bar.example.com or https://example.com will hold your localStorage data. Let's say you pick https://example.com.
(2) Use localStorage normally for that chosen domain's pages.
(3) On all other https://*.example.com pages (the other domains), use JavaScript to set document.domain = "example.com"; (always the superdomain). Then also create a hidden <iframe>, and navigate it to some page on the chosen https://example.com domain (It doesn't matter what page, as long as you can insert a very little snippet of JavaScript on there. If you're creating the site, just make an empty page specifically for this purpose. If you're writing an extension or a Greasemonkey-style userscript and so don't have any control over pages on the example.com server, just pick the most lightweight page you can find and insert your script into it. Some kind of "not found" page would probably be fine).
(4) The script on the hidden iframe page need only (a) set document.domain = "example.com";, and (b) notify the parent window when this is done. After that, the parent window can access the iframe window and all its objects without restriction! So the minimal iframe page is something like:
<!doctype html>
<html>
<head>
<script>
document.domain = "example.com";
window.parent.iframeReady(); // function defined & called on parent window
</script>
</head>
<body></body>
</html>
If writing a userscript, you might not want to add externally-accessible functions such as iframeReady() to your unsafeWindow, so instead a better way to notify the main window userscript might be to use a custom event:
window.parent.dispatchEvent(new CustomEvent("iframeReady"));
Which you'd detect by adding a listener for the custom "iframeReady" event to your main page's window.
(NOTE: You need to set document.domain = example.com even if the iframe's domain is already example.com: Assigning a value to document.domain implicitly sets the origin's port to null, and both ports must match for the iframe and its parent to be considered same-origin. See the note here: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Security/Same-origin_policy#Changing_origin)
(5) Once the hidden iframe has informed its parent window that it's ready, script in the parent window can just use iframe.contentWindow.localStorage, iframe.contentWindow.indexedDB, iframe.contentWindow.BroadcastChannel, iframe.contentWindow.SharedWorker instead of window.localStorage, window.indexedDB, etc. ...and all these objects will be scoped to the chosen https://example.com origin - so they'll have the this same shared origin for all of your pages!
The most awkward part of this technique is that you have to wait for the iframe to load before proceeding. So you can't just blithely start using localStorage in your DOMContentLoaded handler, for example. Also you might want to add some error handling to detect if the hidden iframe fails to load correctly.
Obviously, you should also make sure the hidden iframe is not removed or navigated during the lifetime of your page... OTOH I don't know what the result of that would be, but very likely bad things would happen.
And, a caveat: setting/changing document.domain can be blocked using the Feature-Policy header, in which case this technique will not be usable as described.
However, there is a significantly more-complicated generalization of this technique, that can't be blocked by Feature-Policy, and that also allows entirely unrelated domains to share data, communications, and shared workers (i.e. not just subdomains off a common superdomain). #jcubic already described it in their answer, namely:
The general idea is that, just as above, you create a hidden iframe to provide the correct origin for access; but instead of then just grabbing the iframe window's properties directly, you use script inside the iframe to do all of the work, and you communicate between the iframe and your main window only using postMessage() and addEventListener("message",...).
This works because postMessage() can be used even between different-origin Windows. But it's also significantly more complicated because you have to pass everything through some kind of messaging infrastructure that you create between the iframe and the main window, rather than just using the localStorage, IndexedDB, etc. APIs directly in your main window's code.

GET arbitrary URLs with JavaScript

I want to be able to access /robots.txt from a variety of sites using JavaScript. This is for a side project that tests the availability of sites, not all of which are under my control. I've tried this:
$.get(robotsUrl, function() {
console.log('success!');
}, "text")
.fail(function() {
console.log('failed :(');
});
However, this fails with
XMLHttpRequest cannot load https://my.test.url/robots.txt. Origin http://localhost:8000 is not allowed by Access-Control-Allow-Origin
MDN's page on Same-Origin-Policy says that it's possible to embed content with some elements, such as <script>, <iframe> <embed>. Could I load /robots.txt from an arbitrary site with any of these? Is there any other way I can access this file on other domains?
You could load it with any of them, you just won't be able to make the data available to JavaScript. That's rather the point of the Same Origin Policy.
If you want to get arbitrary data from arbitrary sites, you need to do it server side.
To get around a same origin policy, you need to either have control over the host site and set the allow-origin (not an option here), or load it by a method other than JavaScript (which JSONP does; it is loaded as a standard script).
That means you could display the robots.txt in an iframe, for example, by just setting its src attribute.
If you want to manipulate the contents in JavaScript, that won't work (even after you load the content in an iframe, you're still not allowed to interact with it). Your final option is to set up a proxy. Have a script on your server which when called will load the relevant file and redirect the content. It's not hard to do, but means your server will have higher traffic (and you'll need to lock it down so that it isn't used maliciously).
iframes won't let you peek at the content. You could show it to your user, but I'm guessing you want to analyze it with code.
You could do it on your server. Even if you just have a /cors/robots/domain.tld handler (and others for other files you need to access). This is probably the best way, if it's feasible for your situation.
AnyOrigin, is a free service allows you to make cross-origin requests.
$.getJSON('http://anyorigin.com/get?url=google.com/robots.txt&callback=?', function(data){
console.log(data.contents); // contents of Robots.txt
});
Pretty sure this is possible with Chrome by runnning the browser with the Same Origin Policy disabled: Disable same origin policy in Chrome.
It may be preferable to do something like this outside the context of a browser however, on the command line perhaps using something like CURL?

accessing func in iframe. local to online

HI, i got a simple html page, localy with an iframe. the iframe includes a generated page which got a javascript function. i know want to call that function. of course, im getting "permission denied". so since im new to js and all that stuff i dont know if it's actually possible to do that. give me some hints for searching or a nice solution.
i do cal lthe func like: parent.myiframe.myfunc();
I guess the page in the iframe resides on another server / domain. Modern browser do not allow "cross site scripting", see: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cross-Site_Scripting
If possible, move the site in the iframe to the same server. An alternative (workaround) would be to proxy the page on the local server, so that that for the client it seems to be loaded from the same domain.
Edit: This is also called a "Same Origin Policy". You can only call java script functions in a document that is:
from the same domain (www.mydomain.com)
from the same subdomain (mail.mydomain.com <- no go!)
both use the same port (p.Ex.
accessing a http://... document from
a http*s*:// document won't work).
There might be another workaround if you have access to the iframe's source:
Change the iframe domain to the same as the outer frame's, by applying:
document.domain = "domain.com";
in the iframe source (see http://ajaxian.com/archives/how-to-make-xmlhttprequest-calls-to-another-server-in-your-domain for more information).
Also there is a Draft for "Cross-Origin Resource Sharing" (http://www.w3.org/TR/cors/) that is already partially implemented in several browser, see: http://www.webdavsystem.com/ajax/programming/cross_origin_requests

Can I use localhost as the domain when setting an HTTP cookie?

I am using a jQuery plugin to set cookies and when I use localhost for the domain it will not store the cookie.
Here is the plugin I am using with jQuery 1.2.6.
http://www.stilbuero.de/2006/09/17/cookie-plugin-for-jquery/
Below is the code that I am using. You can see it does not like localhost, and I am running it from a development web server on localhost. One detail is that I am running off port 4005 but that should not affect the domain, AFAIK.
$(function() {
console.log('Testing');
var one = $.cookie('Test.One');
var two = $.cookie('Test.Two');
var three = $.cookie('Test.Three');
console.log(['one', one]);
console.log(['two', two]);
console.log(['three', three]);
$('#div1').text(one);
$('#div2').text(two);
$('#div3').text(three);
$.cookie('Test.One', 'Test 1');
$.cookie('Test.Two', 'Test 2', { path: '/' });
$.cookie('Test.Three', 'Test 3', { path: '/', domain: 'localhost' });
});
I had similar problem with setting cookies. Make up a domain name and add it to your hosts file as 127.0.0.1. Then run web application on that domain.
I think the domain name of a cookie must have exactly two dots (not counting the final dot after the TLD). So .something.localhost is okay, .google.com is okay, but .localhost or google.com is not. But a glance at RFC 2965 suggests that it's more complicated than that... you might want to read that document, especially section 3.3 (and/or its precursor, RFC 2109).
I updated the jQuery plugin to not add the domain to the cookie when it is localhost. That solves my problem without touching the hosts file.
var domain = (options.domain && options.domain !== 'localhost') ? '; domain=' + (options.domain) : '';
I'm using Code Ignitor, and setting the domain to an empty string fixed my problem while working on the application on localhost. I believe this is the better solution as everyone in the development team then doesn't need to mess with their hosts files on Windows.
Production domain values can be put in the config.php of Code Ignitor when deployed on a live site.
I tried setting the host file to use an alternate name (local.acme.com) and I can now set cookies on that domain. It seems I cannot set cookies on localhost, at least not with Firefox. I do not recall that being a restriction for cookies. I would like to understand what is going on here.
Also, I did try just making the domain in the hosts file simply "dev" but that did not work. I had to use a name that ended in .com or another tld to make it work.
Simplest solution for me to resolve this was to use 127.0.0.1 instead of localhost ;-)
That works fine in Firefox!
Cookie needs to specify SameSite attribute, None value used to be the default, but recent browser versions made Lax the default value to have reasonably robust defense against some classes of cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks.
Along with Domain=localhost your cookie should look something like this
document.cookie = `${name}=${value}${expires}; Path=/; Domain=localhost; SameSite=Lax`;
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Set-Cookie/SameSite

Categories