I was just wondering whether there are any way (libraries, frameworks, tutorials) to do javascript tracking with another script? Basically, i want to track as the user work with the site, which function gets executed with what parameters and so on, as detailed as possible.
thanks a lot!
The extent of detail you're expecting will be challenging for any solution to gather and report on without severely slowing down your scripts -- consider that, for every call, at least 1 other call would need to occur to gather this.
You'd be better to pick a few key events (mouse clicks, etc.) and track only a few details (such as time) for them. If you're using ajax, keep JavaScript and the browser oblivious and just track this on server-side.
There's a few options but I'm not sure if there are any "great" ones. I take it Firebug/IE Dev toolbar profiling won't work because you are trying to track remote user's actions.
So, one option (I'm not highly recommending for production purposes), will work in some but not all browsers.
Essentially you overwrite every function, with a wrapper that you then inject your logging.
(I haven't tested this, trying to recall it from memory... hopefully in "pseudo code" you get the idea...)
//e.g. get all functions defined on the global window object
function logAll(){
var funcs = [];
var oldFunc;
for(var i in window){
try {
if(typeof(window[i]) == 'function'){
if(i != 'logAll'){
funcs.push(i);
}
}
} catch(ex){
//handle as desired
}
}
var x;
for(var i in funcs){
x = '_' + new Date().getTime();
window[x] = window[i];//save the old function as new function
//redefine original
window[i] = function(){
//do your logging here...
//then call the real function (and pass all params along)
call(window[x]);
};
}
};
Related
This is the first time I get my hands on with automation instruments in xcode The script works well for all button taps but the one making server connection. I don't know the reason
Here is the script I tried so far
var target = UIATarget.localTarget();
target.pushTimeout(4);
target.popTimeout();
var window=target.frontMostApp().mainWindow()
var appScroll=window.scrollViews()[0];
appScroll.logElementTree();
UIATarget.localTarget().delay(2);
appScroll.buttons()[1].tap();
The above script works up to showing the UIActivityIndicator instead of moving to next controller after success
I know There must be a very simple point I am missing. So help me out
UIAutomation attempts to make things "easy" for the developer, but in doing so it can make things very confusing. It sounds like you're getting a reference to window, waiting for a button to appear, then executing .tap() on that button.
I see that you've already considered messing with target.pushTimeout(), which is related to your issue. The timeout system lets you do something that would be impossible in any sane system: get a reference to an element before it exists. I suspect that behind-the-scenes, UIAutomation repeatedly attempts to get the reference you want -- as long as the timeout will allow.
So, in the example you've posted, it's possible for this "feature" to actually hurt you.
var window=target.frontMostApp().mainWindow()
var appScroll=window.scrollViews()[0];
UIATarget.localTarget().delay(2);
appScroll.buttons()[1].tap();
What if the view changes during the 2-second delay? Your reference to target.frontMostApp().mainWindow.scrollViews()[0] may be invalid, or it may not point to the object you think you're pointing at.
We got around this in our Illuminator framework by forgetting about the timeout system altogether, and just manually re-evaluating a given reference until it actually returns something. We called it waitForChildExistence, but the functionality is basically as follows:
var myTimeout = 3; // how long we want to wait
// this function selects an element
// relative to a parent element (target) that we will pass in
var selectorFn = function (myTarget) {
var ret = myTarget.frontMostApp().mainWindow.scrollViews()[0];
// assert that ret exists, is visible, etc
return ret;
}
// re-evaluate our selector until we get something
var element = null;
var later = get_current_time() + myTimeout;
while (element === null && get_current_time() < later) {
try {
element = selectorFn(target);
} catch (e) {
// must not have worked
}
}
// check whether element is still null
// do something with element
For cases where there is a temporary progress dialog, this code will simply wait for it to disappear before successfully returning the element you want.
Hey guys just testing our pages out using the grunt-phantomcss plugin (it's essentially a wrapper for PhantomJS & CasperJS).
We have some stuff on our sites that comes in dynamically (random profile images for users and random advertisements) sooo technically the page looks different each time we load it, meaning the build fails. We would like to be able to jump in and using good ol' DOM API techniques and 'grey out'/make opaque these images so that Casper/Phantom doesn't see them and passes the build.
We've already looked at pageSettings.loadImages = false and although that technically works, it also takes out every image meaning that even our non-ad, non-profile images get filtered out.
Here's a very basic sample test script (doesn't work):
casper.start( 'http://our.url.here.com' )
.then(function(){
this.evaluate(function(){
var profs = document.querySelectorAll('.profile');
profs.forEach(function( val, i ){
val.style.opacity = 0;
});
return;
});
phantomcss.screenshot( '.profiles-box', 'profiles' );
});
Would love to know how other people have solved this because I am sure this isn't a strange use-case (as so many people have dynamic ads on their sites).
Your script might actually work. The problem is that profs is a NodeList. It doesn't have a forEach function. Use this:
var profs = document.querySelectorAll('.profile');
Array.prototype.forEach.call(profs, function( val, i ){
val.style.opacity = 0;
});
It is always a good idea to register to page.error and remote.message to catch those errors.
Another idea would be to employ the resource.requested event handler to abort all the resources that you don't want loaded. It uses the underlying onResourceRequested PhantomJS function.
casper.on("resource.requested", function(requestData, networkRequest){
if (requestData.url.indexOf("mydomain") === -1) {
// abort all resources that are not on my domain
networkRequest.abort();
}
});
If your page handles unloaded resources well, then this should be a viable option.
I have a context menuitem which is activated if an image is right-clicked, the exact same way that 'context-copyimage' is activated.
Is it possible to tie/pair that menuitem to the 'context-copyimage' therefore eliminating the need to add extra (duplicate) event-listeners and show/hide handlers??!!
(Adding an observer to 'context-copyimage' defeats the purpose)
If not, is it possible to use the event-listener that 'context-copyimage' uses?
Update:
I am trying to reduce listeners. At the moment, script has a popupshowing listeners. On popupshowing, it checks for gContextMenu.onImag and if true, it shows the menuitem. Firefox's context-copyimage does the exact same thing. I was wondering if it was possible to tie these 2 in order to remove/reduce the in-script event listeners.
I was also chatting with Dagger and he said that:
... the state of built-in items isn't set from an event handler, it's
set from the constructor for nsContextMenu, and there are no
mechanisms to hook into it
So it seems, that is not possible
No, there is no sane way of avoiding the event listener that would perform better than another event listener and is compatible with unloading the add-on in session.
Hooking nsContextMenu
As you have been already told, the state is initialized via gContextMenu = new nsContextMenu(...). So you'd need to hook the stuff, which is actually quite easy.
var newProto = Object.create(nsContextMenu.prototype);
newProto.initMenuOriginal = nsContextMenu.prototype.initMenu;
newProto.initMenu = function() {
let rv = this.initMenuOriginal.apply(this, arguments);
console.log("ctx", this.onImage, this); // Or whatever code you'd like to run.
return rv;
};
nsContextMenu.prototype = newProto;
Now, the first question is: Does it actually perform better? After all this just introduced another link in the prototype-chain. Of course, one could avoid Object.create and just override nsContextMenu.prototype.initMenu directly.
But the real question is: How would one remove the hook again? Answer: you really cannot, as other add-ons might have hooked the same thing after you and unhooking would also unhook the other add-ons. But you need to get rid of the reference, or else the add-on will leak memory when disabled/uninstalled. Well, you could fight with Components.utils.makeObjectPropsNormal, but that doesn't really help with closed-over variables. So lets avoid closures... Hmm... You'd need some kind of messaging, e.g. event listeners or observers... and we're back to square one.
Also I wouldn't call this sane compared to
document.getElementById("contentAreaContextMenu").addEventListener(...)
I'd call it "overkill for no measurable benefit".
Overriding onpopupshowing=
One could override the <menupopup onpopupshowing=. Yeah, that might fly... Except that other add-ons might have the same idea, so welcome to compatibility hell. Also this again involves pushing stuff into the window, which causes cross-compartment wrappers, which makes things error-prone again.
Is this a solution? Maybe, but not a sane one.
What else?
Not much, really.
Yes this is absolutely possible.
Morat from mozillazine gave a great solution here: http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?p=13307339&sid=0700480c573017c00f6e99b74854b0b2#p13307339
function handleClick(event) {
window.removeEventListener("click", handleClick, true);
event.preventDefault();
event.stopPropagation();
var node = document.popupNode;
document.popupNode = event.originalTarget;
var menuPopup = document.getElementById("contentAreaContextMenu");
var shiftKey = false;
gContextMenu = new nsContextMenu(menuPopup, shiftKey);
if (gContextMenu.onImage) {
var imgurl = gContextMenu.mediaURL || gContextMenu.imageURL;
}
else if (gContextMenu.hasBGImage && !gContextMenu.isTextSelected) {
var imgurl = gContextMenu.bgImageURL;
}
console.log('imgurl = ', imgurl)
document.popupNode = node;
gContextMenu = null;
}
window.addEventListener("click", handleClick, true);
this gives you access to gContextMenu which has all kinds of properties like if you are over a link, or if you right click on an image, and if you did than gContextMenu.imageURL holds its value. cool stuff
This code here console logs imgurl, if you are not over an image it will log undefined
I'm using the Drupal module "Autologout." https://drupal.org/project/autologout
This module has a timer. When there is no activity on the page for a prescribed amount of time, it kills your session.
I would like to be able to manipulate the timer value. I looked throught the Drupal object in javascript but I can't seem to find where the value is stored. I would like to be able to set activityResetTimer to 0, for example. It seems to be declared here:
autologout.js
(function ($) {
Drupal.behaviors.autologout = {
attach: function(context, settings) {
console.log("This is happening");
if (context != document) {
console.log("CONTEXT IS NOT DOCUMENTS");
return;
}
var paddingTimer;
var t;
var theDialog;
var localSettings;
// Activity is a boolean used to detect a user has
// interacted with the page.
var activity;
// Timer to keep track of activity resets.
var activityResetTimer;
I have looked everywhere (seemingly) in the Drupal js object, but nowhere do I see the activityResetTimer.; http://pastebin.com/PYD2bfcP If you need me to share this in some other way, let me know, I can edit. Also let me know if you need more information or details.
Much appreciated.
Due the nature of this module, it doesn't just store a local variable with a countdown. It uses some Ajax request, form time to time, to check if it should keep the user logged.
If you would like to rewrite the behavior of this counter or interfere on how it works, you should take a look at the module's API. Take a look at autologout.api.php file to see if it has the methods you can use.
I had a page which executes heavy javascript code after loading. To prevent the page from freezing upon loading, I spaced the execution into batches with some "no-execution" time in between (using Timeouts), and things worked well.
Lately, I've had to add additional heavy javascript code which can execute upon client actions, yet these actions can occur even before the original heavy script is done executing. This time, spacing the action won't help, since at the "downtime" of one script the other can run and vice versa, which will cause the browser to freeze.
The problem is actually more complicated as there are multiple such actions, each executing a different heavy script, and each script sort of has a different "priority" as to how fast i'd like it to finish, compared to the other ones.
My question is, what is the common practice in such situations? I tried thinking of a way to solve it, but all I could think of was quite a complex solution which would pretty much be like writing an operating system in javascript - i.e., writing a "manager" code which executes every X time (using an "interrupt"), and chooses which "context to switch to" ( = which job should run right now), etc...
This however sounds pretty complicated to me, and I was hoping there might be other solutions out there. My problem sounds like one which I'd assume many people have stumbled upon before, so even if the only solution is what I suggested, I'd assume someone already wrote it, or there is some library support for this.
Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.
== EDIT ==
by "heavy code", I mean for example the DOM manipulation of a great number of elements.
You will need to think of defining your UI/Problem domain as a set of Asynchronous tasks. Here's some more insight http://alexmaccaw.com/posts/async_ui until I formulate a better answer for you.
If you don't want to block your script you can use web workers. See MDN: Using web workers for a good introduction. Note that web workers are still relative new and not supported by most browser.
However, if you want to support all browser and add some kind of priority for your "heavy scripts", you should define something yourself, e.g:
function WorkerQueue(this_argument){
this.queue = [];
this.this_argument = this_argument;
this.priority = 1;
}
WorkerQueue.prototype.enqueue = function(callback){
this.queue.push(callback);
}
WorkerQueue.prototype.dequeue = function(){
return this.queue.splice(0,1)[0];
}
function WorkerPool(){
this.pool = [];
this.status = "running";
this.timeout = null;
}
WorkerPool.prototype.addWorker = function(this_argument){
this.pool.push(new WorkerQueue(this_argument));
return this.pool[this.pool.length - 1];
}
WorkerPool.prototype.nextTask = function(){
var max_priority = 0;
var max_priority_task = this.pool.length;
for(var i = 0; i < this.pool.length; ++i){
if(this.pool[i].priority > max_priority && this.pool[i].queue.length !== 0){
max_priority = this.pool[i].priority;
max_priority_task = i;
}
}
// pool is empty or all tasks have an invalid priority
if(max_priority_task === this.pool.length)
return;
if(this.pool[max_priority_task].this_argument)
this.pool[max_priority_task].dequeue().apply(this.pool[max_priority_task].this_argument);
else
this.pool[max_priority_task].dequeue().apply();
if(this.status !== "running")
return;
this.timeout = setTimeout(function(t){return function(){t.nextTask();};}(this),1000);
}
var Workers = new WorkerPool();
var worker1 = Workers.addWorker();
worker1.enqueue(function(){
console.log("Hello");
});
worker1.enqueue(function(){
console.log("World");
});
var worker2 = Workers.addWorker();
worker2.priority = 2;
worker2.this_argument = worker2;
worker2.enqueue(function(){
console.log("Worker 2 - changing priority");
this.priority = .2;
});
worker2.enqueue(function(){
console.log("Worker 2 - after change");
});
Workers.nextTask();
Demo
In this case, every "heavy script" is a worker, which is basically a queue of tasks. You create a new worker in the pool by using addWorker and add tasks to the specific workers queue by using worker.enqueue(callback).