I'd like to make an XML document in JavaScript then have a save dialog appear.
It's OK if they have to click before the save can occur.
It's *not* OK if I *have* to use IE to achieve this (I don't even need to support it at all). However, Windows is a required platform (so Firefox or Chrome are the preferred browsers if I can only do this in one browser).
It's *not* OK if I need a web server. But conversely, I don't want to require the JavaScript to be run on a local file only, i.e. elevated privileges -- if possible. That is, I'd like to to run locally or on a *static* host. But just locally is OK.
It's OK to have to bend over backwards to do this. The file won't be very big, but internet access might either be there, be spotty or just not be a possibility at all -- see (3).
So far the only ideas I have seen are to save the XML to an iframe and save that document -- but it seems that you can only do this in IE? Also, that I could construct a data URI and place that in a link. My fear here is that it will just open the XML file in the window, rather than prompt the user to save it.
I know that if I require the JavaScript to be local, I can raise privileges and just directly save the file (or hopefully cause a save dialog box to appear). However, I'd much prefer a solution where I do not require raised privileges (even a Firefox 3.6 only solution).
I apologize if this offends anyone's sensibilities (for example, not supporting every browser). I basically want to write an offline application and Javascript/HTML/CSS seem to be the best candidate considering the complexity of the requirements and the time available. However, I have this single requirement of being able to save data that must be overcome before I can choose this line of development.
How about this downloadify script?
Which is based on Flash and jQuery, which can prompt you dialog box to save file in your computer.
Downloadify.create('downloadify',{
filename: function(){
return document.getElementById('filename').value;
},
data: function(){
return document.getElementById('data').value;
},
onComplete: function(){
alert('Your File Has Been Saved!');
},
onCancel: function(){
alert('You have cancelled the saving of this file.');
},
onError: function(){
alert('You must put something in the File Contents or there will be nothing to save!');
},
swf: 'media/downloadify.swf',
downloadImage: 'images/download.png',
width: 100,
height: 30,
transparent: true,
append: false
});
Using a base64 encoded data URI, this is possible with only html & js. What you can do is encode the data that you want to save (in your case, a string of XML data) into base64, using a js library like jquery-base64 by carlo. Then put the encoded string into a link, and add your link to the DOM.
Example using the library I mentioned (as well as jquery):
<html>
<head>
<title>Example</title>
</head>
<body>
<script>
//include jquery and jquery-base64 here (or whatever library you want to use)
document.write('click to make save dialog');
</script>
</body>
</html>
...and remember to make the content-type something like application/octet-stream so the browser doesn't try to open it.
Warning: some older IE versions don't support base64, but you said that didn't matter, so this should work fine for you.
Without any more insight into your specific requirements, I would not recommend a pure Javascript/HTML solution. From a user perspective you would probably get the best results writing a native application. However if it will be faster to use Javascript/HTML, I recommend using a local application hosting a lightweight web server to serve up your content. That way you can cleanly handle the file saving server-side while focusing the bulk of your effort on the front-end application.
You can code up a web server in - for example - Python or Ruby using very few lines of code and without 3rd party libraries. For example, see:
Making a simple web server in python
WEBrick - Writing a custom servlet
python-trick-really-little-http-server - This one is really simple, and will easily let you server up all of your HTML/CSS/JS files:
"""
Serves files out of its current directory.
Doesn't handle POST requests.
"""
import SocketServer
import SimpleHTTPServer
PORT = 8080
def move():
""" sample function to be called via a URL"""
return 'hi'
class CustomHandler(SimpleHTTPServer.SimpleHTTPRequestHandler):
def do_GET(self):
#Sample values in self for URL: http://localhost:8080/jsxmlrpc-0.3/
#self.path '/jsxmlrpc-0.3/'
#self.raw_requestline 'GET /jsxmlrpc-0.3/ HTTP/1.1rn'
#self.client_address ('127.0.0.1', 3727)
if self.path=='/move':
#This URL will trigger our sample function and send what it returns back to the browser
self.send_response(200)
self.send_header('Content-type','text/html')
self.end_headers()
self.wfile.write(move()) #call sample function here
return
else:
#serve files, and directory listings by following self.path from
#current working directory
SimpleHTTPServer.SimpleHTTPRequestHandler.do_GET(self)
httpd = SocketServer.ThreadingTCPServer(('localhost', PORT),CustomHandler)
print "serving at port", PORT
httpd.serve_forever()
Finally - Depending on who will be using your application, you also have the option of compiling a Python program into a Frozen Binary so the end user does not have to have Python installed on their machine.
Javascript is not allowed to write to a local machine. Your question is similar to this one.
I suggest creating a simple desktop app.
Is localhost PHP server ok? Web traditionally can't save to hard drive because of security concerns. PHP can push files though it requires a server.
Print to PDF plugins are available for available for all browsers. Install once, print to PDF forever. Then, you can use a javascript or Flash to call a Print function.
Also, if you are developing for an environment where internet access is spotty, conwider using VB.NET or some other desktop language.
EDIT:
You can use the browser's Print function.
Are you looking for something like this?
If PHP is ok, if would be much easier.
With IE you could use document.execCommand, but I note that IE is not an option.
Here's something that looks like it might help, although it will not prompt with SaveAs dialog, https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Code_snippets/File_I%2F%2FOL.
One simple but odd way to do this that doesn't require any Flash is to create an <a/> with a data URI for its href. This even has pretty good cross-browser support, although for IE it must be at least version 8 and the URI must be < 32k. It looks like someone else on SO has more to say on the topic.
Why not use a hybrid flash for client and some server solution server-side. Most people have flash so you can default to client side to conserve resources on the server.
Related
I'm working on an HTML/javascript app intended to be run locally.
When dealing with img tags, it is possible to set the src attribute to a file name with a relative path and thereby quickly and easily load an image from the app's directory. I would like to use a similar method to retrieve a text file from the app's directory.
I have used TideSDK, but it is less lightweight. And I am aware of HTTP requests, but if I remember correctly only Firefox has taken kindly to my use of this for local file access (although accessing local images with src does not appear to be an issue). I am also aware of the FileReader object; however, my interface requires that I load a file based on the file name and not based on a file-browser selection as with <input type="file">.
Is there some way of accomplishing this type of file access, or am I stuck with the methods mentioned above?
The browser will not permit you to access files like that but you can make javascript files instead of text files like this:
text1.js:
document.write('This is the text I want to show in here.'); //this is the content of the javascript file
Now call it anywhere you like:
<script type="text/javascript" src="text1.js"></script>
There are too many security issues (restrictions) within browsers making many local web-apps impossible to implement so my solution to a similar problem was to move out of browsers and into node-webkit which combines Chromium + Node.js + your scripts, into an executable with full disk I/O.
http://nwjs.io/
[edit] I'm sorry I thought you wanted to do this with TideSDK, I'll let my answer in case you want to give another try to TideSDK [/edit]
I'm not sure if it's what you're looking for but I will try to explain my case.
I've an application which allow the user to save the state of his progress. To do this, I allow him to select a folder, enter a filename and write this file. When the user open the app, he can open the saved file, and get back his progress. So I assume this enhancement is similar of what you are looking for.
In my case, I use the native File Select to allow the user to select a specific save (I'm using CoffeeScript) :
Ti.UI.currentWindow.openFileChooserDialog(_fileSelected, {
title: 'Select a file'
path: Ti.Filesystem.getDocumentsDirectory().nativePath()
multiple: false
})
(related doc http://tidesdk.multipart.net/docs/user-dev/generated/#!/api/Ti.UI.UserWindow-method-openFileChooserDialog)
When this step is done I will open the selected file :
if !filePath?
fileToLoad = Ti.Filesystem.getFile(scope.fileSelected.nativePath())
else
fileToLoad = Ti.Filesystem.getFile(filePath)
data = Ti.JSON.parse(fileToLoad.read())
(related doc http://tidesdk.multipart.net/docs/user-dev/generated/#!/api/Ti.Filesystem)
Please note that those snippets are copy/paste from my project and they will not work without the rest of my code but I think it's enough to illustrate you how I manage to open a file, and read his content.
In this case I'm using Ti.JSON.parse because there is only javascript object in these files but in your case you can just get the content. The openFileChooserDialog isn't mandatory, if you already know the file name, or if you get it from another way you can use Ti.Filesystem in your own way.
So I've been researching this for a couple days and haven't come up with anything conclusive. I'm trying to create a (very) rudimentary liveblogging setup because I don't want to pay for something like CoverItLive. My process is: Local HTML file > Cloud storage (Dropbox/Drive/etc) > iframe on content page. All that works, and with some CSS even looks pretty nice despite the less-than-awesome approach. But here's the thing: the liveblog itself is made up of an HTML table, and I have to manually copy/paste the code for a new row, fill in the timestamp, write the new message, and save the document (which then syncs with the cloud and shows up in the iframe). To simplify the process I've made another HTML file which I intend to run locally and use to add entries to the table automatically. At the moment it's just a bunch of input boxes and some javascript to automate the timestamp and write the table row from the input data.
Code, as it stands now: http://jsfiddle.net/LukeLC/999bH/
What I'm looking to do from here is find a way to somehow export the generated table data to another .html file on my hard drive. So far I've managed to get this code...
if(document.documentElement && document.documentElement.innerHTML){
var a=document.getElementById("tblive").innerHTML;
a=a.replace(/</g,'<');
var w=window.open();
w.document.open();
w.document.write('<pre><tblive>\n'+a+'\n</tblive></pre>');
w.document.close();
}
}
...to open just the generated table code in a new window, and sure, I can save the source from there, but the whole point is to eliminate steps like that from the process.
How can I tell the page to save the generated code to a separate .html file when I click on the 'submit' button? Again, all of this happens locally, not on a server.
I'm not very good with javascript--and maybe a different language will be necessary--but any help is much appreciated.
I suppose you could do something like this:
var myHTMLDoc = "<html><head><title>mydoc</title></head><body>This is a test page</body></html>";
var uri = "data:application/octet-stream;base64,"+btoa(myHTMLDoc);
document.location = uri;
BTW, btoa might not be cross-browser, I think modern browsers all have it, but older versions of IE don't. AFAIK base64 isn't even needed. you might be able to get away with
var uri = "data:application/octet-stream,"+myHTMLDoc;
Drawbacks with this is that you can't set the filename when it gets saved
You cant do this with javascript but you can have a HTML5 link to open save dialogue:
<a href="pageToDownload.html" download>Download</a>
You could add some smarts to automate it on the processed page after the POST.
fiddle : http://jsfiddle.net/ghQ9M/
Simple answer, you can't.
JavaScript is restricted to perform such operations due to security reasons.
The best way to accomplish that, would be, to call a server page that would write
the new file on the server. Then from javascript perform a POST request to the
server page passing the data you want to write to the new file.
If you want the user to save the page to it's file system, this is a different
problem and the best approach to accomplish that, would be to, notify the user/ask him
to save the page, that page could be your new window like you are doing w.open().
Let me do some demonstration for you:
//assuming you know jquery or are willing to use it :)
var html = $("#tblive").html().replace(/</g, '<');
//generating your download button
$.post('generate_page.php', { content: html })
.done(function( data ) {
var filename = data;
//inject some html to allow user to navigate to the new page (example)
$('#tblive').parent().append(
'Check your Dynamic Page!');
// you data here, is the response from the server so you can return
// your new dynamic page file name here.
// and maybe to some window.location="new page";
});
On the server side, something like this:
<?php
if($_REQUEST["content"]){
$pagename = uniqid("page_", true) . '.html';
file_put_contents($pagename, $_REQUEST["content"]);
echo $pagename;
}
?>
Some notes, I haven't tested the example, but it works in theory.
I assume that with this the effort to implement it should be minimal, assuming this solves your problem.
A server based solution:
You'll need to set up a server (or your PC) to serve your HTML page with headers that tell your browser to download the page instead of processing the HTML markup. If you want to do this on your local machine, you can use software such as WAMP (or MAMP for Mac or LAMP for Linux) that is basically a web server in a .exe. It's a lot of hassle but it'll work.
I would like to know if there is any way to generate a text/xml file in javascript. I want users to be able to fill out a page form when they are offline, save the data, and then use the saved file at a later point in time. The browser will be IE, most likely IE7.
Thanks
The files should be stored on client filesystems, right?
In general, saving data on client's computer by a web script would be considered a security breach. I would avoid doing so but if it's one of your project requirements, you can give it a try.
Since the target platform would be IE, you can try ActiveX. Example code (not tested):
var fso = new ActiveXObject("Scripting.FileSystemObject");
var fh = fso.CreateTextFile("c:\\path\\file.txt", true);
fh.WriteLine("Some text");
fh.Close();
You might have to use Flash in order to access the user's filesystem to save the file. That is the way most client-side components work if they need to create a file wholly on the client.
Time to learn ActionScript, and say goodbye to iDevices compatibility!
Just had a quick question to throw out and see if there was a solution for this...
Let's pretend I have no access to the server.
I load up a webpage and find out that they have a Javascript file loading from a subfolder (let's say /scripts/js/some.js)
Now, I want to make changes to this file locally and test it against the whole site without downloading the entire site to a local folder.
Does anyone know of a way I can override the loading of that remote js file in favor of a local/edited copy of it?
Try using noscript or adblock to block the server side script from loading. Then use greasemonkey to load your own script.
I actually found a solution for this. Posting details for anyone that comes here looking for it.
Privoxy (www.privoxy.org/) [Free] Allows this for the most part through a redirect. Though Firefox may block the redirect depending on where you put it. This means you most likely will not be able to save the file locally and reference it via file://etc/
( I wish I had a way to tell you how to statically fiddle with JavaScript on web pages you have limited access to... but I have not found it. If an answer comes along I will accept it over this. )
Of course, you have to set up Privoxy, and use it as a local proxy server. It's pretty simple if you only use it temporarily: Just point your browser to proxy 127.0.0.1 on port 8118 with it running.
You have to add a redirect "default action" (Options > Edit Default Actions) to redirect the browser to use your new copy:
{ +redirect{/newLocation/some.js} }
/scripts/js/some.js
If you want a way to use a local file instead of a remote file (in any web browser), I highly recommend Charles Web Proxy. http://www.charlesproxy.com/
In Charles, go to the Tools menu and select Map Local. Add a new mapping by entering the address of the file on the web you would like loaded from your disk.
This technique will for all sorts of files (JavaScript, CSS, SWF). Of course you have the option to temporarily disable this feature, and it will only work while Charles is running. Very handy.
While your solution with proxy is somewhat more permanent, I found that with Fiddler you can do it with almost no configuration:
How to replace Javascript of production website with local Javascript?
In a browser that supports FileReader such as Chrome, yes, in combination with 'eval' to execute arbitrary JS. In your HTML add a button for the user to press:
<form>
<input type="file" name="file"
onchange="loadJS(event.target.files);">
</form>
In your scripts add:
function load() {
var reader = new FileReader();
reader.onload = function(evt) {
eval(evt.target.result);
};
reader.readAsText(files[0]);
}
I have this situation where we have media files stored on a global CDN. Our web app is hosted on it's own server and then when the media assets are needed they are called from the CDN url. Recently we had a page where the user can download file attachments, however some of the file types were opening in the browser instead of downloading (such as MP3). The only way around this was to manually specify the HTTP response to attach the file but the only way I could achieve this was to download the file from CDN to my server and then feed it back to the user, which defeats the purpose of having it on the global CDN. Instead I am wondering if there is some client side solution for this?
EDIT: Just found this somewhere, though I'm not sure if it will work right in all the browsers?
<body>
<script>
function downloadme(x){
myTempWindow = window.open(x,'','left=10000,screenX=10000');
myTempWindow.document.execCommand('SaveAs','null','download.pdf');
myTempWindow.close();
}
</script>
<a href=javascript:downloadme('/test.pdf');>Download this pdf</a>
</body>
RE-EDIT: Oh well, so much for that idea -> Does execCommand SaveAs work in Firefox?
Does your CDN allow you to specify the HTTP headers? Amazon cloudfront does, for example.
I found an easy solution to this that worked for me. Add a URL parameter to the file name. This will trick the browser into bypassing it's built in file mappings. For examaple, instead of http://mydomain.com/file.pdf , set your client side link up to point to http://mydomain.com/file.pdf? (added a question mark)