We Keep Coding

Reactjs closure when passing state to component

I got a react functional component:
const DataGrid = (props) =>
{
const [containerName, setContainerName] = useState("");
const [frameworkComponents, setFrameworkComponents] = useState(
{customLoadingOverlay: LoadingOverlayTemplate,
customNoRowsOverlay: UxDataGridCustomNoRows,
editButton: params => <ViewAndDeleteSetting {...params}
openAddConfigurationsWindow={openAddConfigurationsWindow}
onDeleteSetting={onDeleteSetting}/>,
});
useEffect(async () =>
{
if(props.containerName && props.containerName !== "")
{
setContainerName(props.containerName);
}
},[props.containerName]);
.
.
.
const onDeleteSetting = async (settingKey) =>
{
console.log("ON DELETE AND CONTAINER NAME:");
console.log(containerName); //HERE THE CONTAINER NAME IS EMPTY
...
}
return (
<UxDataGrid
frameworkComponents={frameworkComponents}/>
);
The container name inside useEffect exists and is not empty. As you can see in the comment in onDeleteSetting, the containerName is empty when this callback is invoked. I tried adding this to the useEffect after setContainerName:
setFrameworkComponents({customLoadingOverlay: LoadingOverlayTemplate,
customNoRowsOverlay: UxDataGridCustomNoRows,
editButton: params => <ViewAndDeleteSetting {...params}
openAddConfigurationsWindow={openAddConfigurationsWindow}
onDeleteSetting={onDeleteSetting}/>,
});
That didn't work.
How can I get the name inside the callback? There is no special need to leave that frameworkComponents struct in the state.. it can also be moved to somewhere else if you think its better

Try this in your useEffect, update the onDeleteSetting function with the new containerName when it's updated
.....
useEffect(async() => {
if (props.containerName && props.containerName !== "") {
setContainerName(props.containerName);
// move this function here
const onDeleteSetting = async(settingKey) => {
console.log("ON DELETE AND CONTAINER NAME:");
// use props.containerName since the state update is async
console.log(props.containerName);
...
}
// update your components with the updated functions
setFrameworkComponents(prevComponents => ({
...prevComponents,
editButton: params =>
<ViewAndDeleteSetting
{...params}
openAddConfigurationsWindow={openAddConfigurationsWindow}
onDeleteSetting={onDeleteSetting}
/>,
}));
}
}, [props.containerName]);
.....
This should provide the updated state with the updated function, if it works, I can add more details.

You almost certainly shouldn't be storing it in state. Props are essentially state controlled by the parent. Just use it from props. Copying props to state is usually not best practice.
If you're looking at one of the very rare situations where it makes sense to set derived state based on props, this page in the documentation tells you how to do that with hooks. Basically, you don't use useEffect, you do your state update right away.
Here's a full quote from the linked documentation:
How do I implement getDerivedStateFromProps?
While you probably don’t need it, in rare cases that you do (such as implementing a <Transition> component), you can update the state right during rendering. React will re-run the component with updated state immediately after exiting the first render so it wouldn’t be expensive.
Here, we store the previous value of the row prop in a state variable so that we can compare:
function ScrollView({row}) {
const [isScrollingDown, setIsScrollingDown] = useState(false);
const [prevRow, setPrevRow] = useState(null);
if (row !== prevRow) {
// Row changed since last render. Update isScrollingDown.
setIsScrollingDown(prevRow !== null && row > prevRow);
setPrevRow(row);
}
return `Scrolling down: ${isScrollingDown}`;
}
This might look strange at first, but an update during rendering is exactly what getDerivedStateFromProps has always been like conceptually.
If you did it the same way they did in that example, your component would still render with containerName set to the default state (""), it's just that it will then almost immediately re-render with the updated containerName. That makes sense for their example of a transition, but you could avoid that by making the prop's initial value the state's initial value, like this:
const DataGrid = (props) => {
const [containerName, setContainerName] = useState(props.containerName); // *** ONLY USES THE INITIAL PROP VALUE
const [frameworkComponents, setFrameworkComponents] = useState(
// ...
});
// *** Updates the state value (on the next render) if the prop changes
if (containerName !== props.containerName) {
setContainerName(props.containerName);
}
// ...
};
Every time the containerName prop changes, though, your component will render twice, which brings us back full circle to: Don't store it in state, just use it from props. :-)
Stepping back and looking at the component as a whole, I don't think you need any state information at all, but if your goal is to avoid having the frameworkComponents you pass UxDataGrid change unnecessarily, you probably want useMemo or React.memo rather than state.
For instance, with useMemo (but keep reading):
const DataGrid = ({containerName}) => {
const frameworkComponents = useMemo(() => {
const onDeleteSetting = async (settingKey) => {
console.log("ON DELETE AND CONTAINER NAME:");
console.log(containerName);
// ...
};
return {
customLoadingOverlay: LoadingOverlayTemplate,
editButton: params => <ViewAndDeleteSetting {...params}
openAddConfigurationsWindow={openAddConfigurationsWindow}
onDeleteSetting={onDeleteSetting} />,
};
}, [containerName]);
return (
<UxDataGrid frameworkComponents={frameworkComponents} />
);
};
But if componentName is your only prop, it may well be even simpler with React.memo:
const DataGrid = React.memo(({containerName}) => {
const onDeleteSetting = async (settingKey) => {
console.log("ON DELETE AND CONTAINER NAME:");
console.log(containerName);
// ...
};
return (
<UxDataGrid frameworkComponents={{
customLoadingOverlay: LoadingOverlayTemplate,
editButton: params => <ViewAndDeleteSetting {...params}
openAddConfigurationsWindow={openAddConfigurationsWindow}
onDeleteSetting={onDeleteSetting} />,
}} />
);
});
React.memo memoizes your component, so that your component function is only ever called again when the props change. Since everything in the component needs to update based on the componentName prop changing, that looks like a good match (but I don't know what UxDataGrid is).

The problem was with how I tried passing props to ViewAndDeleteSetting. If you want to pass prop to a cell rendered component, you shouldn't be doing it in frameworkComponents, but rather you need to do it in the column definition like this:
useEffect(() =>
{
let columns = [{headerName: '', cellRenderer: 'editButton', width: 90, editable: false,
cellRendererParams: {
openAddConfigurationsWindow: openAddConfigurationsWindow,
onDeleteSetting: onDeleteSetting
}},
.. other columns
]
setColumnDefinition(columns);
},[props.containerName]);
The columns with the cellRendererParams do gets recreated in the useEffect when the name changes, and then the component can access this params regularly via its props

react memo is not getting props

React memo isn't capturing the props neither the prevProps nor the nextProps and the component render well. The react docs say
If your function component renders the same result given the same props, you can wrap it in a call to React.memo for a performance boost.
my problem is to stop twice rendering using react memo, but memo seems to be not working and the component renders twice with the same props.
The component renders when the Create New Event is clicked on /events
here is the live sandbox.
Child Component located at /components/Event/CreateEvent/CreateEvent.js
the parent component is located at /Pages/Event/Event.js line number 999' from where the child component is being triggered
Here is the Code:
import React from "react";
import AuthContext from "../../context/global-context";
import CreateEvent from "../../components/Event/CreateEvent/CreateEvent";
function Events({ location }) {
// Sate Managing
const [allEvents, setAllEvents] = React.useState([]);
const [creating, setCreating] = React.useState(false);
// Context As State
const { token, email } = React.useContext(AuthContext);
// Creating Event Showing
const modelBoxHandler = () => {
// works on when the ViewEvent is open
if (eventSelected) {
setEventSelected(null);
return;
}
setCreating(!creating);
};
return (
<div className="events">
{/* New Event Creating */}
{creating && (
<CreateEvent onHidder={modelBoxHandler} allEvents={allEvents} />
)}
{console.log("Event Rendered.js =>")}
</div>
);
}
export default React.memo(Events, () => true);
Child Component where the Rect memo doesn't have props:
import React from "react";
import AuthContext from "../../../context/global-context";
function CreateEvent({ onHidder, allEvents }) {
// Context
const { token } = React.useContext(AuthContext);
console.log("CreatedEvent.js REnder");
return (
... Some code here
);
}
export default React.memo(CreateEvent, (prevProps, nextProps) => {
console.log("Hello", prevProps, nextProps);
});
Thanks in advance for your valuable answer and times!

The problem is that on basis of creating variable you are actually remounting and not rendering the CreateEvent component. What it means is that if creating variable changes, the component is unmounted and re-mounted when creating is true, so its not a re-render
Also you must note that modelBoxHandler function reference also changes on each re-render so even if your CreateEvent component is in rendered state and the parent re-rendered due to some reason , the CreateEvent component too will re-render
There are 2 changes that you need to make to make it work better
Define modelBoxHandler with a useCallback hook
perform conditional rendering in createEvent based on creating prop
// Creating Event Showing
const modelBoxHandler = useCallback(() => {
// works on when the ViewEvent is open
if (eventSelected) {
setEventSelected(null);
return;
}
setCreating(prevCreating => !prevCreating);
}, [eventSelected]);
...
return (
<div className="events">
{/* New Event Creating */}
<CreateEvent creating={creating} onHidder={modelBoxHandler} allEvents={allEvents} />
{console.log("Event Rendered.js =>")}
</div>
);
and in createEvent
function CreateEvent({ onHidder, allEvents, creating }) {
// Context
const { token } = React.useContext(AuthContext);
console.log("CreatedEvent.js REnder");
if(!creating) {
return null;
}
return (
... Some code here
);
}
export default React.memo(CreateEvent);

In your example, you don't have an additional render for React.memo to work.
According to your render logic, there aren't any nextProps, you unmount the component with conditional rendering (creating).
// You toggle with `creating` value, there is only single render each time
creating && <CreateEvent onHidder={modelBoxHandler} allEvents={allEvents}/>
// Works, because there will be multiple renders (nextProps)
true && <CreateEvent onHidder={modelBoxHandler} allEvents={allEvents} />
In this case, you might not need React.memo.

React Testing if Hook State was Updated by a Child Component

I've read several articles on testing React Hooks and it seems the general advice is not to directly test state. We want to be testing things that the user will actually see. In my situation I have a hook which is either true or false. This hook will determine what gets rendered in my component. Also this hook is passed as a prop to a child which is where the state change will occur.
I am looking for a way to just set the initial hook state in my test so that I don't have to go through rendering child components and context in my test just to click a button.
The parent component has the following hook and function:
export const AssignRoles = props => {
let [openForm, setOpenForm] = useState(false);
const handleFormOpen = (type) => {
setOpenForm(openForm = !openForm);
};
return (
<div>
<div>
{openForm ? <Component /> : < OtherComponent formOpen={handleFormOpen}/>}
</div>
</div>
);
};
The hook openForm initially is false so the <OtherComponent> loads and takes our hook updater function as a prop.
What I want to do is write a test that checks what renders when openForm = true
I have tried a few tests like this:
it('renders <Component/>', () => {
let openForm = true
const wrapper = mount(<AssignRoles openForm={openForm}/>);
expect(wrapper).toContain(<Component/>);
});
but haven't been successful.

Add the initial state as a prop value:
export const AssignRoles = ({initialOpenForm = false}) => {
let [openForm, setOpenForm] = useState(initialOpenForm);
const handleFormOpen = () => {
setOpenForm(!openForm);
};
return (
<div>
<div>
{openForm ? <Component /> : < OtherComponent formOpen={handleFormOpen}/>}
</div>
</div>
);
};
Then in your test:
it('renders <Component/>', () => {
const wrapper = mount(<AssignRoles initialOpenForm={true}/>);
expect(wrapper).toContain(<Component/>);
});

React memo keeps rendering when props have not changed

I have a stateless functional component which has no props and populates content from React context. For reference, my app uses NextJS and is an Isomorphic App. I'm trying to use React.memo() for the first time on this component but it keeps re-rendering on client side page change, despite the props and context not changing. I know this due to my placement of a console log.
A brief example of my component is:
const Footer = React.memo(() => {
const globalSettings = useContext(GlobalSettingsContext);
console.log('Should only see this once');
return (
<div>
{globalSettings.footerTitle}
</div>
);
});
I've even tried passing the second parameter with no luck:
const Footer = React.memo(() => {
...
}, () => true);
Any ideas what's going wrong here?
EDIT:
Usage of the context provider in _app.js looks like this:
class MyApp extends App {
static async getInitialProps({ Component, ctx }) {
...
return { globalSettings };
}
render() {
return (
<Container>
<GlobalSettingsProvider settings={this.props.globalSettings}>
...
</GlobalSettingsProvider>
</Container>
);
}
}
The actual GlobalSettingsContext file looks like this:
class GlobalSettingsProvider extends Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
const { settings } = this.props;
this.state = { value: settings };
}
render() {
return (
<Provider value={this.state.value}>
{this.props.children}
</Provider>
);
}
}
export default GlobalSettingsContext;
export { GlobalSettingsConsumer, GlobalSettingsProvider };

The problem is coming from useContext. Whenever any value changes in your context, the component will re-render regardless of whether the value you're using has changed.
The solution is to create a HOC (i.e. withMyContext()) like so;
// MyContext.jsx
// exported for when you really want to use useContext();
export const MyContext = React.createContext();
// Provides values to the consumer
export function MyContextProvider(props){
const [state, setState] = React.useState();
const [otherValue, setOtherValue] = React.useState();
return <MyContext.Provider value={{state, setState, otherValue, setOtherValue}} {...props} />
}
// HOC that provides the value to the component passed.
export function withMyContext(Component){
<MyContext.Consumer>{(value) => <Component {...value} />}</MyContext.Consumer>
}
// MyComponent.jsx
const MyComponent = ({state}) => {
// do something with state
}
// compares stringified state to determine whether to render or not. This is
// specific to this component because we only care about when state changes,
// not otherValue
const areEqual = ({state:prev}, {state:next}) =>
JSON.stringify(prev) !== JSON.stringify(next)
// wraps the context and memo and will prevent unnecessary
// re-renders when otherValue changes in MyContext.
export default React.memo(withMyContext(MyComponent), areEqual)
Passing context as props instead of using it within render allows us to isolate the changing values we actually care about using areEqual. There's no way to make this comparison during render within useContext.
I would be a huge advocate for having a selector as a second argument similar to react-redux's new hooks useSelector. This would allow us to do something like
const state = useContext(MyContext, ({state}) => state);
Who's return value would only change when state changes, not the entire context.
But I'm just a dreamer.
This is probably the biggest argument I have right now for using react-redux over hooks for simple apps.

Is it possible to share states between components using the useState() hook in React?

I was experimenting with the new Hook feature in React. Considering I have the following two components (using React Hooks) -
const HookComponent = () => {
const [username, setUsername] = useState('Abrar');
const [count, setState] = useState();
const handleChange = (e) => {
setUsername(e.target.value);
}
return (
<div>
<input name="userName" value={username} onChange={handleChange}/>
<p>{username}</p>
<p>From HookComponent: {count}</p>
</div>
)
}
const HookComponent2 = () => {
const [count, setCount] = useState(999);
return (
<div>
<p>You clicked {count} times</p>
<button onClick={() => setCount(count + 1)}>
Click me
</button>
</div>
);
}
Hooks claim to solve the problem of sharing stateful logic between components but I found that the states between HookComponent and HookComponent2 are not sharable. For example the change of count in HookComponent2 does not render a change in the HookComponent.
Is it possible to share states between components using the useState() hook?

If you are referring to component state, then hooks will not help you share it between components. Component state is local to the component. If your state lives in context, then useContext hook would be helpful.
Fundamentally, I think you misunderstood the line "sharing stateful logic between components". Stateful logic is different from state. Stateful logic is stuff that you do that modifies state. For e.g., a component subscribing to a store in componentDidMount() and unsubscribing in componentWillUnmount(). This subscribing/unsubscribing behavior can be implemented in a hook and components which need this behavior can just use the hook.
If you want to share state between components, there are various ways to do so, each with its own merits:
1. Lift State Up
Lift state up to a common ancestor component of the two components.
function Ancestor() {
const [count, setCount] = useState(999);
return <>
<DescendantA count={count} onCountChange={setCount} />
<DescendantB count={count} onCountChange={setCount} />
</>;
}
This state sharing approach is not fundamentally different from the traditional way of using state, hooks just give us a different way to declare component state.
2. Context
If the descendants are too deep down in the component hierarchy and you don't want to pass the state down too many layers, you could use the Context API.
There's a useContext hook which you can leverage on within the child components.
3. External State Management Solution
State management libraries like Redux or Mobx. Your state will then live in a store outside of React and components can connect/subscribe to the store to receive updates.

It is possible without any external state management library. Just use a simple observable implementation:
function makeObservable(target) {
let listeners = []; // initial listeners can be passed an an argument aswell
let value = target;
function get() {
return value;
}
function set(newValue) {
if (value === newValue) return;
value = newValue;
listeners.forEach((l) => l(value));
}
function subscribe(listenerFunc) {
listeners.push(listenerFunc);
return () => unsubscribe(listenerFunc); // will be used inside React.useEffect
}
function unsubscribe(listenerFunc) {
listeners = listeners.filter((l) => l !== listenerFunc);
}
return {
get,
set,
subscribe,
};
}
And then create a store and hook it to react by using subscribe in useEffect:
const userStore = makeObservable({ name: "user", count: 0 });
const useUser = () => {
const [user, setUser] = React.useState(userStore.get());
React.useEffect(() => {
return userStore.subscribe(setUser);
}, []);
const actions = React.useMemo(() => {
return {
setName: (name) => userStore.set({ ...user, name }),
incrementCount: () => userStore.set({ ...user, count: user.count + 1 }),
decrementCount: () => userStore.set({ ...user, count: user.count - 1 }),
}
}, [user])
return {
state: user,
actions
}
}
And that should work. No need for React.Context or lifting state up

This is possible using the useBetween hook.
See in codesandbox
import React, { useState } from 'react';
import { useBetween } from 'use-between';
const useShareableState = () => {
const [username, setUsername] = useState('Abrar');
const [count, setCount] = useState(0);
return {
username,
setUsername,
count,
setCount
}
}
const HookComponent = () => {
const { username, setUsername, count } = useBetween(useShareableState);
const handleChange = (e) => {
setUsername(e.target.value);
}
return (
<div>
<input name="userName" value={username} onChange={handleChange}/>
<p>{username}</p>
<p>From HookComponent: {count}</p>
</div>
)
}
const HookComponent2 = () => {
const { count, setCount } = useBetween(useShareableState);
return (
<div>
<p>You clicked {count} times</p>
<button onClick={() => setCount(count + 1)}>
Click me
</button>
</div>
);
}
We move React hooks stateful logic from HookComponent to useShareableState.
We call useShareableState using useBetween in each component.
useBetween is a way to call any hook. But so that the state will not be stored in the React component.
For the same hook, the result of the call will be the same. So we can call one hook in different components and work together on one state. When updating the shared state, each component using it will be updated too.
Disclaimer: I'm the author of the use-between package.

the doc states:
We import the useState Hook from React. It lets us keep local state in a function component.
it is not mentioned that the state could be shared across components, useState hook just give you a quicker way to declare a state field and its correspondent setter in one single instruction.

I've created hooksy that allows you to do exactly this - https://github.com/pie6k/hooksy
import { createStore } from 'hooksy';
interface UserData {
username: string;
}
const defaultUser: UserData = { username: 'Foo' };
export const [useUserStore] = createStore(defaultUser); // we've created store with initial value.
// useUserStore has the same signature like react useState hook, but the state will be shared across all components using it
And later in any component
import React from 'react';
import { useUserStore } from './userStore';
export function UserInfo() {
const [user, setUser] = useUserStore(); // use it the same way like useState, but have state shared across any component using it (eg. if any of them will call setUser - all other components using it will get re-rendered with new state)
function login() {
setUser({ username: 'Foo' })
}
return (
<div>
{!user && <strong>You're logged out<button onPress={login}>Login</button></strong>}
{user && <strong>Logged as <strong>{user.username}</strong></strong>}
</div>
);
}

With hooks its not directly possible.
I recommend you to take a look at react-easy-state.
https://github.com/solkimicreb/react-easy-state
I use it in big Apps and it works like a charm.

I'm going to hell for this:
// src/hooks/useMessagePipe.ts
import { useReducer } from 'react'
let message = undefined
export default function useMessagePipe() {
const triggerRender = useReducer((bool) => !bool, true)[1]
function update(term: string) {
message = term.length > 0 ? term : undefined
triggerRender()
}
return {message: message, sendMessage: update}
}
Full explanation over at: https://stackoverflow.com/a/72917627/1246547
Yes, this is the dirtiest and most concise way i could come up with for solving that specific use case. And yes, for a clean way, you probably want to learn how to useContext, or alternatively take a look at react-easy-state or useBetween for low-footprint solutions, and flux or redux for the real thing.

You will still need to lift your state up to an ancestor component of HookComponent1 and HookComponent2. That's how you share state before and the latest hook api doesnt change anything about it.