I have a stateless functional component which has no props and populates content from React context. For reference, my app uses NextJS and is an Isomorphic App. I'm trying to use React.memo() for the first time on this component but it keeps re-rendering on client side page change, despite the props and context not changing. I know this due to my placement of a console log.
A brief example of my component is:
const Footer = React.memo(() => {
const globalSettings = useContext(GlobalSettingsContext);
console.log('Should only see this once');
return (
<div>
{globalSettings.footerTitle}
</div>
);
});
I've even tried passing the second parameter with no luck:
const Footer = React.memo(() => {
...
}, () => true);
Any ideas what's going wrong here?
EDIT:
Usage of the context provider in _app.js looks like this:
class MyApp extends App {
static async getInitialProps({ Component, ctx }) {
...
return { globalSettings };
}
render() {
return (
<Container>
<GlobalSettingsProvider settings={this.props.globalSettings}>
...
</GlobalSettingsProvider>
</Container>
);
}
}
The actual GlobalSettingsContext file looks like this:
class GlobalSettingsProvider extends Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
const { settings } = this.props;
this.state = { value: settings };
}
render() {
return (
<Provider value={this.state.value}>
{this.props.children}
</Provider>
);
}
}
export default GlobalSettingsContext;
export { GlobalSettingsConsumer, GlobalSettingsProvider };
The problem is coming from useContext. Whenever any value changes in your context, the component will re-render regardless of whether the value you're using has changed.
The solution is to create a HOC (i.e. withMyContext()) like so;
// MyContext.jsx
// exported for when you really want to use useContext();
export const MyContext = React.createContext();
// Provides values to the consumer
export function MyContextProvider(props){
const [state, setState] = React.useState();
const [otherValue, setOtherValue] = React.useState();
return <MyContext.Provider value={{state, setState, otherValue, setOtherValue}} {...props} />
}
// HOC that provides the value to the component passed.
export function withMyContext(Component){
<MyContext.Consumer>{(value) => <Component {...value} />}</MyContext.Consumer>
}
// MyComponent.jsx
const MyComponent = ({state}) => {
// do something with state
}
// compares stringified state to determine whether to render or not. This is
// specific to this component because we only care about when state changes,
// not otherValue
const areEqual = ({state:prev}, {state:next}) =>
JSON.stringify(prev) !== JSON.stringify(next)
// wraps the context and memo and will prevent unnecessary
// re-renders when otherValue changes in MyContext.
export default React.memo(withMyContext(MyComponent), areEqual)
Passing context as props instead of using it within render allows us to isolate the changing values we actually care about using areEqual. There's no way to make this comparison during render within useContext.
I would be a huge advocate for having a selector as a second argument similar to react-redux's new hooks useSelector. This would allow us to do something like
const state = useContext(MyContext, ({state}) => state);
Who's return value would only change when state changes, not the entire context.
But I'm just a dreamer.
This is probably the biggest argument I have right now for using react-redux over hooks for simple apps.
Related
React memo isn't capturing the props neither the prevProps nor the nextProps and the component render well. The react docs say
If your function component renders the same result given the same props, you can wrap it in a call to React.memo for a performance boost.
my problem is to stop twice rendering using react memo, but memo seems to be not working and the component renders twice with the same props.
The component renders when the Create New Event is clicked on /events
here is the live sandbox.
Child Component located at /components/Event/CreateEvent/CreateEvent.js
the parent component is located at /Pages/Event/Event.js line number 999' from where the child component is being triggered
Here is the Code:
import React from "react";
import AuthContext from "../../context/global-context";
import CreateEvent from "../../components/Event/CreateEvent/CreateEvent";
function Events({ location }) {
// Sate Managing
const [allEvents, setAllEvents] = React.useState([]);
const [creating, setCreating] = React.useState(false);
// Context As State
const { token, email } = React.useContext(AuthContext);
// Creating Event Showing
const modelBoxHandler = () => {
// works on when the ViewEvent is open
if (eventSelected) {
setEventSelected(null);
return;
}
setCreating(!creating);
};
return (
<div className="events">
{/* New Event Creating */}
{creating && (
<CreateEvent onHidder={modelBoxHandler} allEvents={allEvents} />
)}
{console.log("Event Rendered.js =>")}
</div>
);
}
export default React.memo(Events, () => true);
Child Component where the Rect memo doesn't have props:
import React from "react";
import AuthContext from "../../../context/global-context";
function CreateEvent({ onHidder, allEvents }) {
// Context
const { token } = React.useContext(AuthContext);
console.log("CreatedEvent.js REnder");
return (
... Some code here
);
}
export default React.memo(CreateEvent, (prevProps, nextProps) => {
console.log("Hello", prevProps, nextProps);
});
Thanks in advance for your valuable answer and times!
The problem is that on basis of creating variable you are actually remounting and not rendering the CreateEvent component. What it means is that if creating variable changes, the component is unmounted and re-mounted when creating is true, so its not a re-render
Also you must note that modelBoxHandler function reference also changes on each re-render so even if your CreateEvent component is in rendered state and the parent re-rendered due to some reason , the CreateEvent component too will re-render
There are 2 changes that you need to make to make it work better
Define modelBoxHandler with a useCallback hook
perform conditional rendering in createEvent based on creating prop
// Creating Event Showing
const modelBoxHandler = useCallback(() => {
// works on when the ViewEvent is open
if (eventSelected) {
setEventSelected(null);
return;
}
setCreating(prevCreating => !prevCreating);
}, [eventSelected]);
...
return (
<div className="events">
{/* New Event Creating */}
<CreateEvent creating={creating} onHidder={modelBoxHandler} allEvents={allEvents} />
{console.log("Event Rendered.js =>")}
</div>
);
and in createEvent
function CreateEvent({ onHidder, allEvents, creating }) {
// Context
const { token } = React.useContext(AuthContext);
console.log("CreatedEvent.js REnder");
if(!creating) {
return null;
}
return (
... Some code here
);
}
export default React.memo(CreateEvent);
In your example, you don't have an additional render for React.memo to work.
According to your render logic, there aren't any nextProps, you unmount the component with conditional rendering (creating).
// You toggle with `creating` value, there is only single render each time
creating && <CreateEvent onHidder={modelBoxHandler} allEvents={allEvents}/>
// Works, because there will be multiple renders (nextProps)
true && <CreateEvent onHidder={modelBoxHandler} allEvents={allEvents} />
In this case, you might not need React.memo.
I have some heavy forms that I'm dealing with. Thus, I'm trying to squeeze performance wherever I can find it. Recently I added the Why-did-you-render addon to get more insight on what might be slowing down my pages. I noticed that, for example, when I click on a checkbox component about all of my other components re-render. The justification is always the same. WDYR says
Re-rendered because of props changes: different functions with the
same name {prev onChangeHandler: ƒ} "!==" {next onChangeHandler: ƒ}
As much as possible, I try to respect best the best practices indications that I find. The callback functions that my component passes follow this pattern
import React, { useState, useEffect } from 'react';
import { useTranslation } from 'react-i18next';
export function TopLevelComponent({props}){
const defaultData = {name: '', useMale: false, useFemale: false}
const [data, setData] = useState(defData);
const { t } = useTranslation();
const updateState = (_attr, _val) => {
const update = {};
update[_attr] = _val;
setData({ ...data, ...update });
}
const updateName = (_v) => updateState('name', _v);//Text input
const updateUseMale = (_v) => updateState('useMale', _v);//checkbox
const updateUseFemale = (_v) => updateState('useFemale', _v);//checkbox
...
return <div>
...
<SomeInputComponent value={data.name} text={t('fullName')} onChangeHandler={updateName} />
<SomeCheckboxComponent value={data.useMale} onChangeHandler={updateUseMale} text={t('useMale')}/>
<SomeCheckboxComponent value={data.useFemale} onChangeHandler={updateUseFemale} text={t('useFemale')}/>
...
</div>
}
In an example like this one, altering any of the inputs (eg: Writing text in the text input or clicking one of the checkboxes) would cause the other 2 components to re-render with the justification presented above.
I guess that I could stop using functional components and utilize the shouldComponentUpdate() function, but functional components do present some advantages that I'd rather keep. How should I write my functions in such a way that interacting with one input does not force an update on another input?
The problem stems from the way you define your change handlers:
const updateName = (_v) => updateState('name', _v)
This line is called on each render and thus, every time your component is rendered, the prop has a new (albeit functionality-wise identical) value. The same holds for every other handler as well.
As an easy solution you can either upgrade your functional component to a fully fledged component and cache the handlers outside of the render function, or you can implement shouldComponentUpdate() in your child components.
You need to use memo for your child components to reduce renders
const SomeInputComponent = props => {
};
export default memo(SomeInputComponent);
// if it still causes rerender witout any prop change then you can use callback to allow or block render
e.f.
function arePropsEqual(prevProps, nextProps) {
return prevProps.name === nextProps.name; // use your logic to determine if props are same or not
}
export default memo(SomeInputComponent, arePropsEqual);
/* One reason for re-render is that `onChange` callback passed to child components is new on each parent render which causes child components to re-render even if you use `momo` because function is updated on each render so in order to fix this, you can use React hook `useCallback` to get the same function reference on each render.
So in you parent component, you need to do something like
*/
import { useCallback } from 'react';
const updateName = useCallback((_v) => updateState('name', _v), [])
You have to memoize parent function before pass to children, using useCallback for functional component or converting to class property if you use class.
export default class Parent extends React.PureComponent {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.onClick = this.onClick.bind(this);
}
onClick() {
console.log("click");
}
render() {
return (
<ChildComponent
onClick={ this.onClick }
/>
);
}
}
with useCallback:
Parent = () => {
const onClick = useCallback(
() => console.log('click'),
[]
);
return (
<ChildComponent
onClick={onClick}
/>
);
}
So I have this navigator component where depending on a value coming from another component, I need to show a different bottom navigation.
For now I am getting an error on the context consumer, here:
import { ThemeProvider, ThemeConsumer } from '../context/some';
const SelectedRoute = () => (
<ThemeConsumer>
{context => (context ? MainTabNavigator : PickupNavigator)}
</ThemeConsumer>
);
export default createAppContainer(
createSwitchNavigator(
{
App: SelectedRoute,
},
),
);
This is the only thing I have to create context:
const ThemeContext = React.createContext(0);
export const ThemeProvider = ThemeContext.Provider;
export const ThemeConsumer = ThemeContext.Consumer;
I am getting this warning:
Warning: Functions are not valid as a React child. This may happen if you return a Component instead of from render. Or maybe you meant to call this function rather than return it.
What can I do to render what I need correctly?
You want to return JSX from the function given as child to ThemeConsumer, not just return a component.
const SelectedRoute = () => (
<ThemeConsumer>
{context => (context ? <MainTabNavigator /> : <PickupNavigator />)}
</ThemeConsumer>
);
I have not run the example, but just suggesting from the docs. I thought the explanation was pretty clear but I could be wrong.
Just define a context variable in a separate file, in your case like this:
export const IndexContext = React.createContext({
indexValue: value,
toggleNavigator: () => {},
});
In your component(which receives indexValue), you can use the context value and toggle accordingly:
<ThemeContext.Consumer>
{({indexValue, toggleNavigator}) => (
// your component which uses the theme
)}
</ThemeContext.Consumer>
Since your component A is a stateful component, you can handle changes and update the context value there.
class App extends React.Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.toggleIndex = () => {
this.setState({ index });
this.handleStateIndexChange();
MY_CONTEXT = index;
};
// State also contains the updater function so it will
// be passed down into the context provider
this.state = {
index: index,
toggleIndex: this.toggleIndex,
};
}
render() {
// The entire state is passed to the provider
return (
<IndexContext.Provider value={this.state}>
<Content />
</IndexContext.Provider>
);
}
}
I hope this helps.
I know this question has been answered but i just cannot handle what's going so wrong. I'm having a wrapper function:
const withTracker = (WrappedComponent, partnerTrackingCode, options = {}) => {
const trackPage = (page) => {
ReactGA.set({
page,
options
});
ReactGA.pageview(page);
};
class HOC extends Component {
componentDidMount() {
ReactGA.initialize(partnerTrackingCode);
const page = this.props.location.pathname;
trackPage(page);
}
componentWillReceiveProps(nextProps) {
const currentPage = this.props.location.pathname;
const nextPage = nextProps.location.pathname;
if (currentPage !== nextPage) {
trackPage(nextPage);
}
}
render() {
return <WrappedComponent {...this.props} />;
}
}
return HOC;
};
export default withTracker;
and i'm calling it here:
export default (props) => {
const MainComponent = (
<div>
...
</div>
);
if (props.partnerTrackingCode) {
return (
withTracker(MainComponent, props.partnerTrackingCode)
);
}
return (<div />);
};
When the tracking code is defined and the withTracker is called even if mainComponent is a component it shows me this error: A valid React element (or null) must be returned. You may have returned undefined, an array or some other invalid object
I've also try to replace the WrappedComponent with an empty div:
return(<div />)
but still the same error
It looks like you're confusing elements and components here. You're passing around elements (the actual output you want to be rendered), whereas a HOC is a component (a function that generally takes a set of props and returns an element). You're passing an element to your HOC, so when it tries rendering it (in the HOC render function) it can't render it and you get the error.
To fix, you'd firstly need to make your MainComponent into an actual component instead of just the element you want it to return, e.g.:
const MainComponent = props => (
<div>
...
</div>
)
Then to use that with your wrapper you'd want to wrap and then render that:
if (props.partnerTrackingCode) {
const MainWithTracker = withTracker(MainComponent, props.partnerTrackingCode)
return <MainWithTracker />;
}
This is a bit weird though, as you need to create the wrapped component within your render method, which isn't how you'd normally do things. It might make more sense to change your HOC so that it returns a component that takes the partnerTrackingCode as a prop instead of an argument to your HOC. Something along the lines of:
// your HOC (omitting irrelevant bits)
const withTracker = (WrappedComponent, options = {}) => {
...
class HOC extends Component {
componentDidMount() {
ReactGA.initialize(this.props.partnerTrackingCode);
...
}
...
render() {
// pull out the tracking code so it doesn't get passed through to the
// wrapped component
const { partnerTrackingCode, ...passthrough } = this.props;
return <WrappedComponent {...passthrough} />;
}
}
return HOC;
};
// in your component
const MainComponent = props => (
<div>
...
</div>
);
const MainWithTracker = withTracker(MainComponent);
export default (props) => {
if (props.partnerTrackingCode) {
return (<MainWithTracker partnerTrackingCode={props.partnerTrackingCode} />);
}
return (<div />);
};
(I don't think this is the best way to do it, I've just tried keeping as close to your code as I could. Once you start restructuring it, with your better knowledge of exactly what you're trying to do you may find a better way to organise it.)
your problem in your return method , in first step you must be know
when you want call HOC , you must write like this
return withTracker(MainComponent, props.partnerTrackingCode)
instead this
return (
withTracker(MainComponent, props.partnerTrackingCode)
);
remove ()
and then check again , if you still have error tell me
I've been getting started with react-redux and finding it a very interesting way to simplify the front end code for an application using many objects that it acquires from a back end service where the objects need to be updated on the front end in approximately real time.
Using a container class largely automates the watching (which updates the objects in the store when they change). Here's an example:
const MethodListContainer = React.createClass({
render(){
return <MethodList {...this.props} />},
componentDidMount(){
this.fetchAndWatch('/list/method')},
componentWillUnmount(){
if (isFunction(this._unwatch)) this._unwatch()},
fetchAndWatch(oId){
this.props.fetchObject(oId).then((obj) => {
this._unwatch = this.props.watchObject(oId);
return obj})}});
In trying to supply the rest of the application with as simple and clear separation as possible, I tried to supply an alternative 'connect' which would automatically supply an appropriate container thus:
const connect = (mapStateToProps, watchObjectId) => (component) => {
const ContainerComponent = React.createClass({
render(){
return <component {...this.props} />
},
componentDidMount(){
this.fetchAndWatch()},
componentWillUnmount(){
if (isFunction(this._unwatch)) this._unwatch()},
fetchAndWatch(){
this.props.fetchObject(watchObjectId).then((obj) => {
this._unwatch = this.props.watchObject(watchObjectId);
return obj})}
});
return reduxConnect(mapStateToProps, actions)(ContainerComponent)
};
This is then used thus:
module.exports = connect(mapStateToProps, '/list/method')(MethodList)
However, component does not get rendered. The container is rendered except that the component does not get instantiated or rendered. The component renders (and updates) as expected if I don't pass it as a parameter and reference it directly instead.
No errors or warnings are generated.
What am I doing wrong?
This is my workaround rather than an explanation for the error:
In connect_obj.js:
"use strict";
import React from 'react';
import {connect} from 'react-redux';
import {actions} from 'redux/main';
import {gets} from 'redux/main';
import {isFunction, omit} from 'lodash';
/*
A connected wrapper that expects an oId property for an object it can get in the store.
It fetches the object and places it on the 'obj' property for its children (this prop will start as null
because the fetch is async). It also ensures that the object is watched while the children are mounted.
*/
const mapStateToProps = (state, ownProps) => ({obj: gets.getObject(state, ownProps.oId)});
function connectObj(Wrapped){
const HOC = React.createClass({
render(){
return <Wrapped {...this.props} />
},
componentDidMount(){
this.fetchAndWatch()},
componentWillUnmount(){
if (isFunction(this._unwatch)) this._unwatch()},
fetchAndWatch(){
const {fetchObject, watchObject, oId} = this.props;
fetchObject(oId).then((obj) => {
this._unwatch = watchObject(oId);
return obj})}});
return connect(mapStateToProps, actions)(HOC)}
export default connectObj;
Then I can use it anywhere thus:
"use strict";
import React from 'react';
import connectObj from 'redux/connect_obj';
const Method = connectObj(React.createClass({
render(){
const {obj, oId} = this.props;
return (obj) ? <p>{obj.id}: {obj.name}/{obj.function}</p> : <p>Fetching {oId}</p>}}));
So connectObj achieves my goal of creating a project wide replacement for setting up the connect explicitly along with a container component to watch/unwatch the objects. This saves quite a lot of boiler plate and gives us a single place to maintain the setup and connection of the store to the components whose job is just to present the objects that may change over time (through updates from the service).
I still don't understand why my first attempt does not work and this workaround does not support injecting other state props (as all the actions are available there is no need to worry about the dispatches).
Try using a different variable name for the component parameter.
const connect = (mapStateToProps, watchObjectId) => (MyComponent) => {
const ContainerComponent = React.createClass({
render() {
return <MyComponent {...this.props} obj={this.state.obj} />
}
...
fetchAndWatch() {
fetchObject(watchObjectId).then(obj => {
this._unwatch = watchObject(watchObjectId);
this.setState({obj});
})
}
});
...
}
I think the problem might be because the component is in lower case (<component {...this.props} />). JSX treats lowercase elements as DOM element and capitalized as React element.
Edit:
If you need to access the obj data, you'll have to pass it as props to the component. Updated the code snippet