We Keep Coding

call a methods of a class without using NEW keyword inside other class node js

I want to access Main class methods to another Person class without creating a new instance Is it possible??
Can we access it without creating an instance of a class
let myInstance = new Person();
class Main {
constructor(args) {
this.hooks = [];
}
add_hooks(name, func) {
if (!this.hooks[name]) this.hooks[name] = [];
this.hooks[name].push(func);
}
call_hooks(name, ...params) {
if (this.hooks[name]) this.hooks[name].forEach((func) => func(...params));
}
}
other class Person how to access without using new keyword
const Main = require("./main.js");
class Person {
exec() {
const action = Main();
action.add_hook("jump", console.log.bind(console, "this will log "));
}
}

There is no big magic to it. Since the OP just wants to reuse prototypal Main methods, one is going to explicitly delegate the method/s of interest which was/were provided/accessed before via Main.prototype ...
class Main {
constructor(args) {
this.hooks = {};
}
add_hooks(name, func) {
if (!this.hooks[name]) {
this.hooks[name] = [];
}
this.hooks[name].push(func);
}
call_hooks(name, ...params) {
if (this.hooks[name]) {
this.hooks[name].forEach(func => func(...params));
}
}
}
// const Main = require("./main.js");
class Person {
// // ... either add `hooks` as public property at instantiation time ...
// hooks = {};
exec() {
const ref = Main.prototype;
ref.add_hooks.call(this, "jump", console.log.bind(console, "this will log"));
}
}
// ... or add `hooks` via additional glue code ...
function createPersonWithHooksAndExecute() {
const type = new Person();
type.hooks = {};
type.exec();
return type;
}
const someone = createPersonWithHooksAndExecute();
console.log({ someone });
// this will log
Main.prototype.call_hooks.call(someone, "jump");
.as-console-wrapper { min-height: 100%!important; top: 0; }

If you're not planning on instantiating the object, and you don't care about having multiple instances with each having their own state, you don't need a class.
Just create individual functions, or export an object.
const hooks = [];
export function add_hooks(name, func) {
if (!hooks[name]) hooks[name] = [];
hooks[name].push(func);
}
export function call_hooks(name, ...params) {
if (!hooks[name]) return;
for (const func of this.hooks[name]) {
func(...params);
}
}
It's possible too to do this with static methods, and that would be the likely answer if you write Java where everything has to be a class, but I wouldn't recommended it in Javascript.

Force the use of setters instead of straight assignments in a JS ES6 Class

I have a CameraBuilder class that looks like this:
class CameraBuilder {
constructor() {
if (arguments.length) {
throw new Error('[CameraBuilder constructor ERROR] class constructor does not accept parameters.');
}
this.camera = {};
}
withFarmLabel(farmLabel) {
this.camera.farm_label = farmLabel;
return this;
}
// more methods here
build() {
const missingProps = [];
if (!this.camera.farm_label) {
missingProps.push('\nMissing farm_label property. Use the withFarmLabel method in order to assign it.');
}
// more validations like the one above here
if (missingProps.length) {
const errorMsg = missingProps.join('');
throw new Error(`[CameraBuilder build ERROR] ${errorMsg}`);
}
return this.camera;
}
}
Since most of my validations are on the build() method and there are some business logic on some of these methods associated with how the user is building an instance of CameraBuilder, I wouldn't want anyone assigning cameraBuilderObj.camera directly. Is there any way I can enforce the use of the Class methods in order to assign properties to the Camera object?

You could make the camera property private by putting # in front of it, ensuring that only CameraBuilder's internals can reference it:
class CameraBuilder {
#camera = {};
constructor() {
if (arguments.length) {
throw new Error('[CameraBuilder constructor ERROR] class constructor does not accept parameters.');
}
}
withFarmLabel(farmLabel) {
this.#camera.farm_label = farmLabel;
return this;
}
// more methods here
build() {
const missingProps = [];
if (!this.#camera.farm_label) {
missingProps.push('\nMissing farm_label property. Use the withFarmLabel method in order to assign it.');
}
// more validations like the one above here
if (missingProps.length) {
const errorMsg = missingProps.join('');
throw new Error(`[CameraBuilder build ERROR] ${errorMsg}`);
}
return this.#camera;
}
}
const c = new CameraBuilder();
c.withFarmLabel('label');
console.log(c.camera);
console.log(c.build().farm_label);

CertainPerformance's answer probably makes more sense--don't expose it in the first place--but if for some reason you didn't want to go that route (or if you're in an environment where private fields aren't supported) you could define setters on it, so that direct assignments go through your function.
class Foo {
constructor () {
this._bar = 'baz';
}
set bar (value) {
this._bar = value;
console.log('do whatever you want to do here.');
}
}
const f = new Foo();
f.bar = 'hey'; // direct assignment invokes the setter

Revealing Module Pattern Javascript

Which approach is more convenient in an real life project? Can someone please enlighten me? And tell the difference between all of them(efficiency / clean code etc.)
All of them give the same result. Classes are ES6.
2nd approach Constructor pattern combined with Revealing Module Pattern.
3rd is only a constructor pattern / function and the properties are used in an normal function declaration.
I want to make an application which i insert some data from the input form, creating with the classes / constructors and then display it in the UI. Data obviously is always changing( creating multiple objects when i insert new input form)
// 1st approach with classes
const test1 = (() => {
class TestClass {
constructor() {
this.string = 'Class';
}
classMethod() {
console.log(this.string);
}
}
const testClass = new TestClass();
return {
testClass
}
})();
test1.testClass.classMethod();
// 2nd approach with constructor and constructor protoype methods
const test2 = (() => {
function TestConstructor() {
this.string = 'Constructor';
}
TestConstructor.prototype = {
constructorMethod() {
console.log(this.string);
}
}
const testConstr = new TestConstructor();
return {
testConstr
}
})();
test2.testConstr.constructorMethod();
// 3rd approach with constructor with function declaration
const test3 = (() => {
function TestConstructor() {
this.string = 'Constructor with function declaration';
}
const testConstr = new TestConstructor();
function normal() {
console.log(testConstr.string);
}
return {
normal
}
})();
test3.normal();

How do I know who has instantiated a function? [duplicate]

I am creating a JavaScript code and I had a situation where I want to read the object name (string) in the object method. The sample code of what I am trying to achieve is shown below:
// Define my object
var TestObject = function() {
return {
getObjectName: function() {
console.log( /* Get the Object instance name */ );
}
};
}
// create instance
var a1 = TestObject();
var a2 = TestObject();
a1.getObjectName(); // Here I want to get the string name "a1";
a2.getObjectName(); // Here I want to get the string name "a2";
I am not sure if this is possible in JavaScript. But in case it is, I would love to hear from you guys how to achieve this.

This is not possible in JavaScript. A variable is just a reference to an object, and the same object can be referenced by multiple variables. There is no way to tell which variable was used to gain access to your object. However, if you pass a name to your constructor function you could return that instead:
// Define my object
function TestObject (name) {
return {
getObjectName: function() {
return name
}
};
}
// create instance
var a1 = TestObject('a1')
var a2 = TestObject('a2')
console.log(a1.getObjectName()) //=> 'a1'
console.log(a2.getObjectName()) //=> 'a2'

This is definitely possible but is a bit ugly for obvious reasons. I think this can have some application in debugging. The solution makes use of the ability to get the line number for a code using Error object and then reading the source file to get the identifier.
let fs = require('fs');
class Foo {
constructor(bar, lineAndFile) {
this.bar = bar;
this.lineAndFile = lineAndFile;
}
toString() {
return `${this.bar} ${this.lineAndFile}`
}
}
let foo = new Foo(5, getLineAndFile());
console.log(foo.toString()); // 5 /Users/XXX/XXX/temp.js:11:22
readIdentifierFromFile(foo.lineAndFile); // let foo
function getErrorObject(){
try { throw Error('') } catch(err) { return err; }
}
function getLineAndFile() {
let err = getErrorObject();
let callerLine = err.stack.split("\n")[4];
let index = callerLine.indexOf("(");
return callerLine.slice(index+1, callerLine.length-1);
}
function readIdentifierFromFile(lineAndFile) {
let file = lineAndFile.split(':')[0];
let line = lineAndFile.split(':')[1];
fs.readFile(file, 'utf-8', (err, data) => {
if (err) throw err;
console.log(data.split('\n')[parseInt(line)-1].split('=')[0].trim());
})
}

Depending on what your needs are, there are some creative solutions. The main place I want to know a variable name is when I'm debugging.
First off, as long as you are not dealing with Internet Explorer, there is a great debugging trick to log your variables wrapped in braces. The console will show you the details of your "object"... which has only one key, the exact name of your variable!
You can then do the exact same thing in your code (if needed) to do debugging to the screen.
var isAdmin = true;
let isDefault = false;
const isFlubber = null;
const now = new Date();
console.log({isAdmin});
console.log({isDefault});
console.log({isFlubber});
console.log({now});
//You can also use console.dir() or console.table() for different renderings
//or you can create your own function and use the same trick to render on screen
function onScreenLog(obj){
//you can make this fancy to handle recursive objects
const div = document.getElementById('onscreen-log');
for(const [key, value] of Object.entries(obj)){
div.innerHTML += key + ': <b>' + value + '</b><br/>';
}
}
onScreenLog({isAdmin});
onScreenLog({isDefault});
onScreenLog({isFlubber});
onScreenLog({now});
<div id="onscreen-log" style="background=color:#fffedf;border:1px solid #ddd;font-family:sans-serif;height:75px;padding:2px;"></div>

Credit goes to this article's author:
// Define my object
function TestObject (name) {
return {
getObjectName: function() {
return name
}
};
}
// create instance
const a1 = TestObject('a1')
const a2 = TestObject('a2')
const [a1Name] = Object.keys({a1})
const [a2Name] = Object.keys({a2})
console.log(a1Name) //=> 'a1'
console.log(a2Name) //=> 'a2'

With objects that are serializable, in the contexts like HTTPS,
for (itr in window) {
try {
if (JSON.stringify(window[itr])==JSON.stringify(this)){
alert(itr) //return itr
}
} catch (err) {}
};/**************************************************************************/(new Audio('https://ia804500.us.archive.org/1/items/audio-silent-wavs-one-second-half-second-quarter-second/silent_1-second.mp3'));

It is possible if:
Your variables are available in the global space
and redefine TestObject so that it can be instantiated.
// Define my object
function TestObject(){}
TestObject.prototype.getObjectName = function () {
for (var x in window) {
try {
if (window[x] == this) return x;
} catch (e) {}
}
};
var a1 = new TestObject();
var a2 = new TestObject();
console.log(a1.getObjectName());
console.log(a2.getObjectName());

How would you overload the [] operator in javascript

I can't seem to find the way to overload the [] operator in javascript. Anyone out there know?
I was thinking on the lines of ...
MyClass.operator.lookup(index)
{
return myArray[index];
}
or am I not looking at the right things.

You can do this with ES6 Proxy (available in all modern browsers)
var handler = {
get: function(target, name) {
return "Hello, " + name;
}
};
var proxy = new Proxy({}, handler);
console.log(proxy.world); // output: Hello, world
console.log(proxy[123]); // output: Hello, 123
Check details on MDN.

You can't overload operators in JavaScript.
It was proposed for ECMAScript 4 but rejected.
I don't think you'll see it anytime soon.

The simple answer is that JavaScript allows access to children of an Object via the square brackets.
So you could define your class:
MyClass = function(){
// Set some defaults that belong to the class via dot syntax or array syntax.
this.some_property = 'my value is a string';
this['another_property'] = 'i am also a string';
this[0] = 1;
};
You will then be able to access the members on any instances of your class with either syntax.
foo = new MyClass();
foo.some_property; // Returns 'my value is a string'
foo['some_property']; // Returns 'my value is a string'
foo.another_property; // Returns 'i am also a string'
foo['another_property']; // Also returns 'i am also a string'
foo.0; // Syntax Error
foo[0]; // Returns 1
foo['0']; // Returns 1

Use a proxy. It was mentioned elsewhere in the answers but I think that this is a better example:
var handler = {
get: function(target, name) {
if (name in target) {
return target[name];
}
if (name == 'length') {
return Infinity;
}
return name * name;
}
};
var p = new Proxy({}, handler);
p[4]; //returns 16, which is the square of 4.

We can proxy get | set methods directly. Inspired by this.
class Foo {
constructor(v) {
this.data = v
return new Proxy(this, {
get: (obj, key) => {
if (typeof(key) === 'string' && (Number.isInteger(Number(key)))) // key is an index
return obj.data[key]
else
return obj[key]
},
set: (obj, key, value) => {
if (typeof(key) === 'string' && (Number.isInteger(Number(key)))) // key is an index
return obj.data[key] = value
else
return obj[key] = value
}
})
}
}
var foo = new Foo([])
foo.data = [0, 0, 0]
foo[0] = 1
console.log(foo[0]) // 1
console.log(foo.data) // [1, 0, 0]

As brackets operator is actually property access operator, you can hook on it with getters and setters. For IE you will have to use Object.defineProperty() instead. Example:
var obj = {
get attr() { alert("Getter called!"); return 1; },
set attr(value) { alert("Setter called!"); return value; }
};
obj.attr = 123;
The same for IE8+:
Object.defineProperty("attr", {
get: function() { alert("Getter called!"); return 1; },
set: function(value) { alert("Setter called!"); return value; }
});
For IE5-7 there's onpropertychange event only, which works for DOM elements, but not for other objects.
The drawback of the method is you can only hook on requests to predefined set of properties, not on arbitrary property without any predefined name.

one sneaky way to do this is by extending the language itself.
step 1
define a custom indexing convention, let's call it, "[]".
var MyClass = function MyClass(n) {
this.myArray = Array.from(Array(n).keys()).map(a => 0);
};
Object.defineProperty(MyClass.prototype, "[]", {
value: function(index) {
return this.myArray[index];
}
});
...
var foo = new MyClass(1024);
console.log(foo["[]"](0));
step 2
define a new eval implementation. (don't do this this way, but it's a proof of concept).
var MyClass = function MyClass(length, defaultValue) {
this.myArray = Array.from(Array(length).keys()).map(a => defaultValue);
};
Object.defineProperty(MyClass.prototype, "[]", {
value: function(index) {
return this.myArray[index];
}
});
var foo = new MyClass(1024, 1337);
console.log(foo["[]"](0));
var mini_eval = function(program) {
var esprima = require("esprima");
var tokens = esprima.tokenize(program);
if (tokens.length == 4) {
var types = tokens.map(a => a.type);
var values = tokens.map(a => a.value);
if (types.join(';').match(/Identifier;Punctuator;[^;]+;Punctuator/)) {
if (values[1] == '[' && values[3] == ']') {
var target = eval(values[0]);
var i = eval(values[2]);
// higher priority than []
if (target.hasOwnProperty('[]')) {
return target['[]'](i);
} else {
return target[i];
}
return eval(values[0])();
} else {
return undefined;
}
} else {
return undefined;
}
} else {
return undefined;
}
};
mini_eval("foo[33]");
the above won't work for more complex indexes but it can be with stronger parsing.
alternative:
instead of resorting to creating your own superset language, you can instead compile your notation to the existing language, then eval it. This reduces the parsing overhead to native after the first time you use it.
var compile = function(program) {
var esprima = require("esprima");
var tokens = esprima.tokenize(program);
if (tokens.length == 4) {
var types = tokens.map(a => a.type);
var values = tokens.map(a => a.value);
if (types.join(';').match(/Identifier;Punctuator;[^;]+;Punctuator/)) {
if (values[1] == '[' && values[3] == ']') {
var target = values[0];
var i = values[2];
// higher priority than []
return `
(${target}['[]'])
? ${target}['[]'](${i})
: ${target}[${i}]`
} else {
return 'undefined';
}
} else {
return 'undefined';
}
} else {
return 'undefined';
}
};
var result = compile("foo[0]");
console.log(result);
console.log(eval(result));

You need to use Proxy as explained, but it can ultimately be integrated into a class constructor
return new Proxy(this, {
set: function( target, name, value ) {
...}};
with 'this'. Then the set and get (also deleteProperty) functions will fire. Although you get a Proxy object which seems different it for the most part works to ask the compare ( target.constructor === MyClass ) it's class type etc. [even though it's a function where target.constructor.name is the class name in text (just noting an example of things that work slightly different.)]

So you're hoping to do something like
var whatever = MyClassInstance[4];
?
If so, simple answer is that Javascript does not currently support operator overloading.

Have a look at Symbol.iterator. You can implement a user-defined ##iterator method to make any object iterable.
The well-known Symbol.iterator symbol specifies the default iterator for an object. Used by for...of.
Example:
class MyClass {
constructor () {
this._array = [data]
}
*[Symbol.iterator] () {
for (let i=0, n=this._array.length; i<n; i++) {
yield this._array[i]
}
}
}
const c = new MyClass()
for (const element of [...c]) {
// do something with element
}