We Keep Coding

Creating jQuery prototyped collection

I need to initialize some kind of a prototype on already existing jQuery elements collection. The main problem is that the prototype should be accessible only inside of that collection and on elements produced by built-in jQuery functions like .find() on that collection or on some children objects inside of that collection, for example:
var $a = $('a');
$a.__proto__.foo/*some magic over here*/ = function(){ alert('foo!'); };
$a.foo(); //should show alert('foo!')
$a.find('b').foo(); //should produce the same action
$('a').foo(); //should produce an error (method not found)
If using $a.__proto__ like in example above, the jQuery.prototype is accessed, so all the new elements in outside of that jQuery-collection (for example, $('a')) are granting an access to .foo() method. That behaviour is unacceptable on a problem statement.
Is that actually possible?

Okay, here's the thing, I have a rather complex ES6 solution, so I won't be able to explain it in great depth, but if you have some particular questions, go ahead.
var wrap = (function wrapper() {
var store = {};
function wrap(fn) {
return new Proxy(fn, {
apply(target, thisArg, argumentsList) {
var result = Reflect.apply(target, thisArg, argumentsList);
// `jQuery(...)` returns a "rich" object that always contain `.length`
if (result.length > 0) {
result = new Proxy(result, {
get(target, propertyKey, receiver) {
var value = Reflect.get(target, propertyKey, receiver);
if (Object.keys(store).includes(propertyKey)) {
value = store[propertyKey];
}
return value;
},
set(target, propertyKey, value, receiver) {
// TODO: use `Reflect.set(), somehow`
// return Reflect.set(store, propertyKey, value, receiver);
return (store[propertyKey] = value);
},
});
}
return result;
}
});
}
return wrap;
})();
var $ = wrap(jQuery);
$.prototype.find = wrap(jQuery.prototype.find); // TODO: implement recursively in `wrap()`
var x = $('div');
var xx = x.find('div');
var xxx = x.find('divvv');
xx.foo = 123;
console.log(x.foo); // 123
console.log(xx.foo); // 123
console.log(xxx.foo); // undefined

Which logger architecture in javascript? [duplicate]

Is there a way to make any function output a console.log statement when it's called by registering a global hook somewhere (that is, without modifying the actual function itself) or via some other means?

Here's a way to augment all functions in the global namespace with the function of your choice:
function augment(withFn) {
var name, fn;
for (name in window) {
fn = window[name];
if (typeof fn === 'function') {
window[name] = (function(name, fn) {
var args = arguments;
return function() {
withFn.apply(this, args);
return fn.apply(this, arguments);
}
})(name, fn);
}
}
}
augment(function(name, fn) {
console.log("calling " + name);
});
One down side is that no functions created after calling augment will have the additional behavior.

As to me, this looks like the most elegant solution:
(function() {
var call = Function.prototype.call;
Function.prototype.call = function() {
console.log(this, arguments); // Here you can do whatever actions you want
return call.apply(this, arguments);
};
}());

Proxy Method to log Function calls
There is a new way using Proxy to achieve this functionality in JS.
assume that we want to have a console.log whenever a function of a specific class is called:
class TestClass {
a() {
this.aa = 1;
}
b() {
this.bb = 1;
}
}
const foo = new TestClass()
foo.a() // nothing get logged
we can replace our class instantiation with a Proxy that overrides each property of this class. so:
class TestClass {
a() {
this.aa = 1;
}
b() {
this.bb = 1;
}
}
const logger = className => {
return new Proxy(new className(), {
get: function(target, name, receiver) {
if (!target.hasOwnProperty(name)) {
if (typeof target[name] === "function") {
console.log(
"Calling Method : ",
name,
"|| on : ",
target.constructor.name
);
}
return new Proxy(target[name], this);
}
return Reflect.get(target, name, receiver);
}
});
};
const instance = logger(TestClass)
instance.a() // output: "Calling Method : a || on : TestClass"
check that this actually works in Codepen
Remember that using Proxy gives you a lot more functionality than to just logging console names.
Also this method works in Node.js too.

If you want more targeted logging, the following code will log function calls for a particular object. You can even modify Object prototypes so that all new instances get logging too. I used Object.getOwnPropertyNames instead of for...in, so it works with ECMAScript 6 classes, which don't have enumerable methods.
function inject(obj, beforeFn) {
for (let propName of Object.getOwnPropertyNames(obj)) {
let prop = obj[propName];
if (Object.prototype.toString.call(prop) === '[object Function]') {
obj[propName] = (function(fnName) {
return function() {
beforeFn.call(this, fnName, arguments);
return prop.apply(this, arguments);
}
})(propName);
}
}
}
function logFnCall(name, args) {
let s = name + '(';
for (let i = 0; i < args.length; i++) {
if (i > 0)
s += ', ';
s += String(args[i]);
}
s += ')';
console.log(s);
}
inject(Foo.prototype, logFnCall);

Here's some Javascript which replaces adds console.log to every function in Javascript; Play with it on Regex101:
$re = "/function (.+)\\(.*\\)\\s*\\{/m";
$str = "function example(){}";
$subst = "$& console.log(\"$1()\");";
$result = preg_replace($re, $subst, $str);
It's a 'quick and dirty hack' but I find it useful for debugging. If you have a lot of functions, beware because this will add a lot of code. Also, the RegEx is simple and might not work for more complex function names/declaration.

You can actually attach your own function to console.log for everything that loads.
console.log = function(msg) {
// Add whatever you want here
alert(msg);
}

Why doesn't JavaScript ES6 support multi-constructor classes?

I want to write my Javascript class like below.
class Option {
constructor() {
this.autoLoad = false;
}
constructor(key, value) {
this[key] = value;
}
constructor(key, value, autoLoad) {
this[key] = value;
this.autoLoad = autoLoad || false;
}
}
I think it would be nice if we can write out class in this way.
Expect to happen:
var option1 = new Option(); // option1 = {autoLoad: false}
var option2 = new Option('foo', 'bar',); // option2 = {foo: 'bar'}
var option3 = new Option('foo', 'bar', false); // option3 = {foo: 'bar', autoLoad: false}

I want to write my Javascript class like below
You can't, in the same way you can't overload standard functions like that. What you can do is use the arguments object to query the number of arguments passed:
class Option {
constructor(key, value, autoLoad) {
// new Option()
if(!arguments.length) {
this.autoLoad = false;
}
// new Option(a, [b, [c]])
else {
this[key] = value;
this.autoLoad = autoLoad || false;
}
}
}
Babel REPL Example
Of course (with your updated example), you could take the approach that you don't care about the number of arguments, rather whether each individual value was passed, in which case you could so something like:
class Option {
constructor(key, value, autoLoad) {
if(!key) { // Could change this to a strict undefined check
this.autoLoad = false;
return;
}
this[key] = value;
this.autoLoad = autoLoad || false;
}
}

What you want is called constructor overloading. This, and the more general case of function overloading, is not supported in ECMAScript.
ECMAScript does not handle missing arguments in the same way as more strict languages. The value of missing arguments is left as undefined instead of raising a error. In this paradigm, it is difficult/impossible to detect which overloaded function you are aiming for.
The idiomatic solution is to have one function and have it handle all the combinations of arguments that you need. For the original example, you can just test for the presence of key and value like this:
class Option {
constructor(key, value, autoLoad = false) {
if (typeof key !== 'undefined') {
this[key] = value;
}
this.autoLoad = autoLoad;
}
}

Another option would be to allow your constructor to take an object that is bound to your class properties:
class Option {
// Assign default values in the constructor object
constructor({key = 'foo', value, autoLoad = true} = {}) {
this.key = key;
// Or on the property with default (not recommended)
this.value = value || 'bar';
this.autoLoad = autoLoad;
console.log('Result:', this);
}
}
var option1 = new Option();
// Logs: {key: "foo", value: "bar", autoLoad: true}
var option2 = new Option({value: 'hello'});
// Logs: {key: "foo", value: "hello", autoLoad: true}
This is even more useful with Typescript as you can ensure type safety with the values passed in (i.e. key could only be a string, autoLoad a boolean etc).

Guessing from your sample code, all you need is to use default values for your parameters:
class Option {
constructor(key = 'foo', value = 'bar', autoLoad = false) {
this[key] = value;
this.autoLoad = autoLoad;
}
}
Having said that, another alternative to constructor overloading is to use static factories. Suppose you would like to be able to instantiate an object from plain parameters, from a hash containing those same parameters or even from a JSON string:
class Thing {
constructor(a, b) {
this.a = a;
this.b = b;
}
static fromHash(hash) {
return new this(hash.a, hash.b);
}
static fromJson(string) {
return this.fromHash(JSON.parse(string));
}
}
let thing = new Thing(1, 2);
// ...
thing = Thing.fromHash({a: 1, b: 2});
// ...
thing = Thing.fromJson('{"a": 1, "b": 2}');

Here's a hack for overloading based on arity (number of arguments). The idea is to create a function from a number of functions with different arities (determined by looking at fn.length).
function overloaded(...inputs) {
var fns = [];
inputs.forEach(f => fns[f.length] = f);
return function() {
return fns[arguments.length].apply(this, arguments);
};
}
var F = overloaded(
function(a) { console.log("function with one argument"); },
function(a, b) { console.log("function with two arguments"); }
);
F(1);
F(2, 3);
Of course this needs a lot of bullet-proofing and cleaning up, but you get the idea. However, I don't think you'll have much luck applying this to ES6 class constructors, because they are a horse of a different color.

you can use static methods,look at my answer to same question
class MyClass {
constructor(a,b,c,d){
this.a = a
this.b = b
this.c = c
this.d = d
}
static BAndCInstance(b,c){
return new MyClass(null,b,c)
}
}
//a Instance that has b and c params
MyClass.BAndCInstance(b,c)

Use object.assigne with arguments with this
This={...this,...arguments}

Its not the overload I wanted, but this is a basic version of how I faked my way through creating an obj1 with some different initialization behavior. I realize I could have expanded the arguments as stated above, but I already had a nasty set of arguments and relatively different data sources to deconstruct that would have really distorted my objectives; this just made it cleaner for my situation...
class obj1{
constructor(v1, v2){
this.a = v1;
this.b = v2;
}
}
class obj1Alt{
constructor(v1, v2){
return new obj1(v1*2,v2*2);
}
}
new obj1(2,4) // returns an obj1
new obj1Alt(2,4) // also returns an obj1
Disclaimer: I've been programming for a long time, but I am fairly new to JS; probably not a best practice.

A javascript function that has a defined function

I am trying you get a better understanding of JavaScript, especially the prototype functionality. I am having trouble with this case:
I am trying to define a function someObject with a type function so that it will behave like the following:
var myTestObject = someObject();
If I call:
myTestObject() ===> "The object is initailType"
and then when this is called
myTestObject.type() ===> "InitialType"
Then if I make this call
myTestObject.type("newtype")
myTestObject.type() ===> "newType"
A call to
myTestObject() ===> "The Object is newType".
I have tried both this How does JavaScript .prototype work?
and this How do you create a method for a custom object in JavaScript?
,but I am getting several different errors depending on how it is implemented, mostly this though (Uncaught TypeError: Object myTestObject has no method 'type'). I feel like I am making this harder then it should be.
edit: more code.
function box(){
var _current = "initialType"
Object.defineProperty(this, "current", {
get: function(){return _current;},
set: function(value){
if(arguments.length === 1){
_current = value;
} }
})
return "The Object is " + this.type(this.current)
}
box.prototype.type = function(newValue){
var type = null;
if(arguments.length == 0){
type = "initialType";
}else {
type = newValue
}
return type
}

I would use something like this:
function Box(){}
Box.prototype.type = "initialType";
Box.prototype.toString = function() {
return "The Object is " + this.type + ".";
};
And use it like this:
var b = new Box();
b.type; // "initialType"
b + ''; // "The Object is initialType."
b.type = 'otherType'; // "otherType"
b.type; // "otherType"
b + ''; // "The Object is otherType."

This does what you've asked, but I don't understand what you want to do with the prototype, so this code doesn't use that. For example, the sample code doesn't use new, so the return value of someObject won't use its prototype.
function someObject()
{
var currentType = "initailType";
var formatter = function() {
return "The object is " + currentType;
};
formatter.type = function(value) {
if (arguments.length == 0) {
return currentType;
} else {
currentType = value;
}
};
return formatter;
}
var myTestObject = someObject();
myTestObject(); // => "The object is initailType"
myTestObject.type(); // => "initialType"
myTestObject.type("newType");
myTestObject.type(); // => "newType"
myTestObject(); // => "The object is newType".
see demo
Edit: example using prototype and new.
function Box() { // class name starts with a capital letter
this._type = "initialType"; // set up default values in constructor function
} // no "return" in constructor function, using "new" handles that
Box.prototype.type = function(value) { // adding method to the prototype
if (arguments.length == 0) { // magic arguments local variable...
return this._type; // initially returns the value set in the constructor
} else {
this._type = value; // update the stored value
}
};
Box.prototype.format = function() // another method on the box, rather than a return from the constructor
{
return "The object is " + this.type(); // could use this._type instead
};
var box = new Box(); // instance variable with lowercase name
console.log(box.type()); // read the default value
console.log(box.format()); // print the message with the initial value of type
box.type("another type"); // set the type property, no return value
console.log(box.format()); // print the new message

Variable is instance of Enum

I have the following javascript code:
function testClass() {
this.SaveValue = function (value) {
var isInstance = value instanceof TestEnum;
if (!isInstance) {
return;
}
}
}
TestEnum = {
VALUE_0: 0,
VALUE_1: 1,
VALUE_2: 2
}
I create an instance of this object in the following way:
$(function () {
var a = new testClass();
a.SaveValue(TestEnum.VALUE_1);
});
All I'd like to do is test that the value passed to the SaveValue function is actually the type of TestEnum. However, when I run this code I get the following error: Uncaught TypeError: Expecting a function in instanceof check, but got 1
Am I going about this the right way? I tried typeof but it only returns number which is not particularly useful to me.

You could create the values as instances of the "class":
function TestEnum(value) {
this._value = value;
}
TestEnum.prototype.valueOf = function() {
return this._value;
}
TestEnum.prototype.toString = function() {
return 'TestEnum_' + this._value;
}
TestEnum.VALUE_0 = new TestEnum(0);
TestEnum.VALUE_1 = new TestEnum(1);
The following would work then:
TestEnum.VALUE_0 instanceof TestEnum
But it also means you'd have to explicitly access the numerical value of one value with .valueOf. In some cases JS will do this automatically for you (like in 5 + TestEnum.VALUE_1). Overriding toString so that you can use a value as property might also be necessary.
It really depends on your use case whether this is a viable solution.
Alternatively, if just want to test whether a value is part of the enum, you can have an additional property which holds all possible values:
TestEnum.values = {0: true, 1: true, ...};
And then test it with
value in TestEnum.values
// or more reliable (fails for inherited `Object` properties)
TestEnum.values.hasOwnProperty(value);
You could even automate this:
function collectValues(obj) {
var values = {}; // or Object.create(null) if available
for (var prop in obj) {
if (obj.hasOwnProperty(prop)) {
values[obj[prop]] = true;
}
}
return values;
}
TestEnum.values = collectValues(TestEnum);
This will only reliably work for primitive values though and won't distinguish between the string "1" and the number 1.

You are passing a number to the function in
a.SaveValue(TestEnum.VALUE_1);
Since TestEnum is simply an Object, and you are referencing a number property on that object, you're calling your function with a number. You should instead create a TestEnumValue object and use that for your Object's properties:
JSFiddle link for below
function testClass() {
this.SaveValue = function (value) {
var isInstance = value instanceof TestEnumValue;
if (!isInstance) {
return;
}
}
}
TestEnumValue = function(arg) {
arg = arg ? arg : 0; // sensible default
this.key = 'VALUE_' + arg;
this.val = arg;
}
Level = {
NumSpiders : new TestEnumValue(0),
NumCreepers: new TestEnumValue(1),
NumZombies : new TestEnumValue(2),
NumChickens: new TestEnumValue // uses default enum value
};
$(function() {
var a = new testClass();
a.SaveValue(Level.NumSpiders);
$('#hi').text(Level.NumSpiders.key);
});

Playing around with this, I noticed that you can leverage the fact that an enum compiles into an object that binds the values both ways combined with a hasOwnProperty check.
export enum TEST_ENUM{
ZERO, // 0
ONE, // 1
TWO, // 2
}
let a = 1;
let b = TEST_ENUM.TWO // 2
let c = 5 // incorrect value
TEST_ENUM.hasOwnProperty(a); // TRUE
TEST_ENUM.hasOwnProperty(b); // TRUE
TEST_ENUM.hasOwnProperty(c); // FALSE
This comes with a few caveats though;
// An object's keys are always strings...
// Although this shouldn't not matter usually (e.g. parsed user input)
TEST_ENUM.hasOwnProperty("2"); // TRUE
// And the enum is bound two-way so:
let input = "TWO";
if (TEST_ENUM.hasOwnProperty(input) { // TRUE
let result = input // "TWO"
// result is now the enum's value, instead of the key.
result = TEST_ENUM[input]; // this would be the correct assignment
};
Of course you can fix both of these with a typeof check, in case of a string assign it TEST_ENUM[mystring].
Note that my intellisense didn't autocomplete the hasOwnProperty function on an enum, but it doesn't complain about it either, and it's available on all browsers.

Edit
Here's an example of how you could do it.
function TestEnum(val) {
this.vals = this.vals || [];
if (this.vals.indexOf(val) == -1) console.log('nope: ' + val);
else console.log('ok: ' + val);
}
(function() {
var vals = {
VALUE_0: 0,
VALUE_1: 1,
VALUE_2: 2
};
TestEnum.prototype.vals = [];
for (var key in vals) {
TestEnum[key] = vals[key];
TestEnum.prototype.vals.push(vals[key]);
}
})();
Now new TestEnum(TestEnum.VALUE_0); is OK, but if you try, say, new TestEnum(3), then it throws an exception.
This is a bit backwards -- x instanceof y means that x has been created as x = new y(). Since TestEnum isn't even a function, you can't create an instance of it, so this isn't going to work.
What you could do is maybe something like this:
function MyEnum(enumVal) { this.val = enumVal; }
a.SaveValue( new MyEnum(TestEnum.VALUE_1) );
Then check using isInstance = value instanceof MyEnum.