I need to filter by "segments" properties, in this case i need to filtering by segment : [name: "general]
I Have following array
const lines = [{
id: 1191,
name: "dev",
segments: []
},
{
id: 1192,
name: "credit",
folder: "Embarazadas",
segments: [{
"name": "general",
},
{
"name": "custom",
}
]
},
{
id: 1311,
name: "box",
segments: [{
"name": "custom",
"line_id": 1431,
"id": 21,
"active": true
}]
},
{
id: 2000,
name: "sin folder",
folder: null,
segments: [{
"name": "custom",
},
{
"name": "general",
}
],
},
{
id: 2000,
name: "credit card",
segments: [{
"name": "general",
}],
},
]
I need to get all objects with segment "general"
i tried with Ramda doing this but i did not get the result, first i did a maps of the lines, and then a filter.
The problem is that sometimes segments attribute arrives empty
const filterLinesBySegments = (lines) => {
const filter = (line) => {
const hasSegments =R.filter(seg => seg["name"] === "general")(line.segments)
const newLine = R.compose(
R.assoc("segments", hasSegments),
)(line)
return newLine
}
const new= R.map(item => {
return R.filter(line => {
return filter(line)
})(item)
})(lines)
return new;
}
To keep only lines which has a general segment, you can use R.filter, with R.where to filter by a specific property. Since segments is an array, use R.any to search if some of the objects has the name of general.
To remove custom from segment you can evolve the object's segments, and reject all items with name: custom.
const { filter, where, any, propEq, reject, evolve, pipe, map } = R
const filterLinesBySegments = filter(where({
segments: any(propEq('name', 'general'))
}))
const filterCustomFromSegments = evolve({
segments: reject(propEq('name', 'custom'))
})
const fn = pipe(
filterLinesBySegments,
map(filterCustomFromSegments),
)
const lines = [{"id":1191,"name":"dev","segments":[]},{"id":1192,"name":"credit","folder":"Embarazadas","segments":[{"name":"general"},{"name":"custom"}]},{"id":1311,"name":"box","segments":[{"name":"custom","line_id":1431,"id":21,"active":true}]},{"id":2000,"name":"sin folder","folder":null,"segments":[{"name":"custom"},{"name":"general"}]},{"id":2000,"name":"credit card","segments":[{"name":"general"}]}]
const result = fn(lines)
console.log(result)
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/ramda/0.27.0/ramda.js"></script>
Related
Trying to turn an array of objects into a nested object. Is there a good method for this? and how do I make it depending on the array length?
Working but is not universal:
https://codesandbox.io/s/thirsty-roentgen-3mdcjv?file=/src/App.js
What I have:
sorting: [
{
"id": "HighestDegree",
"options": [
"HighSchool",
"Undergraduate",
"Bachelor",
"Master",
"Doctor"
]
},
{
"id": "gender",
"options": [
"male",
"female"
]
}
]
What I want:
value: {
"Region": "Oklahoma",
"HighestDegree": {
"HighSchool": {
"male": null,
"female":null
},
"Undergraduate":{
"male": null,
"female":null
}
//and so on...
}
}
The code beneath works but is hardcoded for only two different options. I want it to be able to nest the length of the array. So lets say another object was age it would be {"HighSchool":{male:{"<25":null,"25-35":null}}} etc..
function testSortingArray() {
let sorting = [
{
id: "HighestDegree",
options: ["HighSchool", "Undergraduate", "Bachelor", "Master", "Doctor"]
},
{
id: "gender",
options: ["male", "female"]
}
];
let GoalArray = {};
if (sorting.length > 0) {
sorting[0].options.map((firstArray) => {
let currObject = {};
sorting[1].options.map((secondOption) => {
currObject[secondOption] = null;
});
GoalArray[firstArray] = currObject;
});
}
return GoalArray;
}
console.log(testSortingArray());
You can do it with a recursive function.
The function below reduces every options array to an object, and then continues populating that object if there are rest elements left from the original sorting array.
const fn = ([{ options }, ...rest]) => options.reduce((a, v) => ({
...a,
[v]: rest.length ? fn(rest): null
}), {});
const result = fn(sorting);
Besides the reduce() method, the code above makes use of object and array destructuring and spread syntax.
Complete snippet:
const sorting = [{
"id": "HighestDegree",
"options": [
"HighSchool",
"Undergraduate",
"Bachelor",
"Master",
"Doctor"
]
}, {
"id": "gender",
"options": [
"male",
"female"
]
}, {
"id": "age",
"options": [
"<25",
"25-35"
]
}];
const fn = ([{ options }, ...rest]) => options.reduce((a, v) => ({
...a,
[v]: rest.length ? fn(rest): null
}), {});
const result = fn(sorting);
console.log(result);
Restructuring array of objects to new array
Problem
There’s an array of objects that contains plain strings and might contain nested arrays as well. We want to create a new Array that will contain a node for each item in the array and separate nodes for each array item connected to its parent. Each parent node should have the following structure:
{
id: uuidv4(),
position: { x: 0, y: 0 },
data: { label: <item data goes here> }
}
Each array node with the following schema above, should also have a connection edge item added to the array with the following properties:
{
id: ‘e<array item Id>-<parentId>’,
source: <array item Id>,
target: <parentId>,
}
Example
We have the following array of objects for example:
[
{
"author": "John Doe",
"age": 26,
"books": [
{
"title": "Book 1"
},
{
"title": "Book 2",
"chapters": [
{
"title": "No Way Home",
"page": 256
}
]
}
]
}
]
The expected output is:
[
{
"id": "1",
"data": {
"label": {
"author": "John Doe",
"age": 26,
}
}
},
{
"id": "2",
"data": {
"label": "books" // key of array
}
},
{
"id": "3",
"data": {
"label": {
"title": "Book 1"
}
}
},
{
"id": "4",
"data": {
"label": {
"title": "Book 2"
}
}
},
{
"id": "5",
"data": {
"label": "chapters" // key of array
}
},
{
"id": "6",
"data": {
"label": {
"title": "No Way Home",
"page": 256
}
}
},
{
"id": "e2-1",
"source": "2",
"target": "1"
},
{
"id": "e3-2",
"source": "3",
"target": "2"
},
{
"id": "e4-2",
"source": "4",
"target": "2"
},
{
"id": "e5-4",
"source": "5",
"target": "4"
},
{
"id": "e6-5",
"source": "6",
"target": "5"
}
]
First of all, I would not be answering if there was not already a good answer. Please, on StackOverflow, always show your own attempts and explain where you got stuck. But since there is already an answer, I think this version might be a bit simpler.
Second, I'm assuming this output format is some sort of directed graph, that the first half is your list of vertices and the second half a list of edges. If so I don't know if your output format is constrained here. But if you had the option, I would think a better structure would be an object with vertices and edges properties, each containing an array. You might then not need the edges' ids. And the code could also be simplified.
This version first converts to an intermediate structure like this:
[
{id: "1", data: {label: {author: "John Doe", age: 26}}, children: [
{id: "2", data: {label: "books"}, children: [
{id: "3", data: {label: {title: "Book 1"}}, children: []},
{id: "4", data: {label: {title: "Book 2"}}, children: [
{id: "5", data: {label: "chapters"}, children: [
{id: "6", data: {label: {title: "No Way Home"}}, children: []}
]}
]}
]}
]}
]
Then we flatten that structure into the first section of the output and use it to calculate the relationships (edges?) between nested nodes to go in the second section.
The code looks like this:
const transform = (input) => {
const extract = (os, nextId = ((id) => () => String (++ id)) (0)) => os .map ((o) => ({
id: nextId(),
data: {label: Object .fromEntries (Object .entries (o) .filter (([k, v]) => !Array .isArray (v)))},
children: Object .entries (o) .filter (([k, v]) => Array .isArray (v)) .flatMap (([k, v]) => [
{id: nextId(), data: {label: k}, children: extract (v, nextId)},
])
}))
const relationships = (xs) =>
xs .flatMap (({id: target, children = []}) => [
... children .map (({id: source}) => ({id: `e${source}-${target}`, source, target})),
... relationships (children),
])
const flatten = (xs) =>
xs .flatMap (({children, ...rest}) => [rest, ... flatten (children)])
const res = extract (input)
return [...flatten (res), ... relationships (res)]
}
const input = [{author: "John Doe", age : 26, books: [{title: "Book 1"}, {title: "Book 2", chapters: [{title: "No Way Home", page: 256}]}]}]
console .log (transform (input))
.as-console-wrapper {max-height: 100% !important; top: 0}
We use three separate recursive functions. One does the recursive extract into that intermediate format. Along the way, it adds id nodes using a nextId stateful function (something I usually avoid, but seems to simplify things here.) Then flatten simply recursively lifts the children to sit alongside their parents. And relationships (again recursively) uses the ids of the parent- and child-nodes to add an edge node.
Using these three separate recursive calls is probably less efficient than some other solutions, but I think it leads to much cleaner code.
One has to choose a self recursive approach which in a generic way can process both, array-items and object-entries. Also, while the recursive process takes place, one not only has to create and collect the consecutively/serially numbered (the incremented id value) data nodes, but one in addition needs to keep track of every data node's parent reference in order to finally concatenate the list of edge items (as the OP calls it) to the list of data nodes.
function flattenStructureRecursively(source = [], result = [], tracker = {}) {
let {
parent = null, edgeItems = [],
getId = (id => (() => ++id))(0),
} = tracker;
const createEdgeItem = (id, pid) => ({
id: `e${ id }-${ pid }`,
source: id,
target: pid,
});
const putNodeData = node => {
result.push(node);
if (parent !== null) {
edgeItems.push(createEdgeItem(node.id, parent.id));
}
// every data node is a parent entity too.
parent = node;
};
if (Array.isArray(source)) {
result.push(
...source.flatMap(item =>
flattenStructureRecursively(item, [], {
getId, parent, edgeItems,
})
)
);
} else {
let {
dataNode,
childEntries,
} = Object
.entries(source)
.reduce(({ dataNode, childEntries }, [key, value]) => {
if (value && (Array.isArray(value) || (typeof value === 'object'))) {
// collect any object's iterable properties.
childEntries.push([key, value]);
} else {
// aggregate any object's non iterable
// properties at data node level.
(dataNode ??= {
id: getId(),
data: { label: {} }
}).data.label[key] = value;
}
return { dataNode, childEntries };
}, { dataNode: null, childEntries: [] });
if (dataNode !== null) {
putNodeData(dataNode);
}
childEntries
.forEach(([key, value]) => {
// every object's iterable property is supposed
// to be created as an own parent entity.
dataNode = {
id: getId(),
data: { label: key },
};
putNodeData(dataNode);
result.push(
...flattenStructureRecursively(value, [], {
getId, parent, edgeItems,
})
);
});
}
if (parent === null) {
// append all additionally collected edge items
// in the end of all the recursion.
result.push(...edgeItems);
}
return result;
}
console.log(
flattenStructureRecursively([{
author: "John Doe",
pseudonym: "J.D.",
books: [{
title: "Book 1",
}, {
title: "Book 2",
chapters: [{
title: "No Way Home",
page: 256,
}],
}],
age: 26,
}])
);
.as-console-wrapper { min-height: 100%!important; top: 0; }
I'm working on a react app that mimics a retail website. My main page displays an item, and below has card components of related products. When I click a button on one of the related products, I open a comparison modal that compares features of the current product and the clicked upon product. I figured that to accomplish this, I would create an array of the combined features of the clicked on product and the main page product. I've been struggling to get create an array of objects, where each unique feature has an object with data inside about the features and which product the feature belongs to.
As of right now, I've been able to get an array of all the features that the two products have, but this array has repeats if the products have overlapping features. This makes me unsure of how to render the comparison table because I was planning on mapping over the array and creating a table row for each feature. My current code to format these features is as follows:
formatFeatures: (currentProd, clickedProd) => {
let combinedFeatures = [];
if (clickedProd.features) {
clickedProd.features.forEach(feature => {
let obj = {}
let vals = Object.values(feature);
obj[vals[0]] = [vals[1], clickedProd.id]
combinedFeatures.push(obj)
})
}
currentProd.features.forEach(feature => {
let obj = {}
let vals = Object.values(feature);
obj[vals[0]] = [vals[1], currentProd.id]
combinedFeatures.push(obj)
})
let formattedFeatures = combinedFeatures.reduce((allFeatures, feature) => {
if (Object.keys(feature) in allFeatures) {
allFeatures = [allFeatures[Object.keys(feature)]].concat(feature);
} else {
allFeatures.push(feature);
}
return allFeatures;
}, [])
The result of this is:
[{
"Fabric": ["100% Cotton", 28214]
}, {
"Cut": ["Skinny", 28214]
}, {
"Fabric": ["Canvas", 28212]
}, {
"Buttons": ["Brass", 28212]
}]
This is pretty close to what I am looking for, where I have an array of objects that contain information about the feature and product id of the product, but the repeat in "Fabric" is something I'm struggling to sort out. Ideally, the result would look like this:
[{
"Fabric": ["100% Cotton", 28214],
["Canvas", 28212]
}, {
"Cut": ["Skinny", 28214]
}, {
"Buttons": ["Brass", 28212]
}]
If anyone can help guide me as to how to change my formatting function to accomplish this, I'd be very grateful. Alternatively, if anyone knows a better way to dynamically format a table with a single row for each unique feature given my current result, that would be great too.
The data coming into my helper function is as follows:
CurrentProd:
{
"id": 28212,
"name": "Camo Onesie",
"slogan": "Blend in to your crowd",
"description": "The So Fatigues will wake you up and fit you in. This high energy camo will have you blending in to even the wildest surroundings.",
"category": "Jackets",
"default_price": "140.00",
"created_at": "2021-07-10T17:00:03.509Z",
"updated_at": "2021-07-10T17:00:03.509Z",
"features": [{
"feature": "Fabric",
"value": "Canvas"
}, {
"feature": "Buttons",
"value": "Brass"
}]
}
ClickedProd:
{
"name": "Morning Joggers",
"category": "Pants",
"originalPrice": "40.00",
"salePrice": null,
"photo": "https://images.unsplash.com/photo-1552902865-b72c031ac5ea?ixlib=rb-1.2.1&ixid=eyJhcHBfaWQiOjEyMDd9&auto=format&fit=crop&w=300&q=80",
"id": 28214,
"features": [{
"feature": "Fabric",
"value": "100% Cotton"
}, {
"feature": "Cut",
"value": "Skinny"
}]
}
There seems to be a bigger question of how to structure your data. You say that ideally your results would look like:
[
{
"Fabric":
["100% Cotton",28214],
["Canvas",28212]
},
{
"Cut":
["Skinny",28214]
},
{
"Buttons":
["Brass",28212]
}
]
But what you're really trying to get out of this is a combined list of rows and associated values for each item feature, if it exists. All you really need then is an array of keys for each row you want to display, and objects that let you access the needed property by that key.
The array of keys could look like this:
["Fabric", "Cut", "Buttons"]
The objects you want to access the properties using those keys, for example your CurrentProd, could be this (notice that you can access a feature by calling CurrentProd.features["FeatureName"]):
{
"id":28212,
"name":"Camo Onesie",
// ... //
"features": {
"Fabric": "Canvas",
"Buttons": "Brass"
}
}
Having said that, to get those things you can get the array of keys, which we'll call allFeatureKeys, by reducing over a combined array of CurrentProd.features and ClickedProd.features:
const allFeatureKeys = [
...CurrentProd.features,
...ClickedProd.features
].reduce((acc, cur) => {
return acc.findIndex(cur.feature) > -1 ? [...acc, cur.feature] : acc
},
[]
);
And you can modify your CurrentProd to the above data shape by reducing over the array of its features, let's call this modifiedCurrentProd:
const modifiedCurrentProd = {
...CurrentProd,
features: CurrentProd.features.reduce((acc, cur) => {
return {...acc, [cur.feature]: cur.value}
}, {})
}
Repeat that for a modifiedClickedProd object, then you have both CurrentProd.features and ClickedProd.features values available for a lookup when you create your table values.
As an example only, since I don't know your react structure or what data you want to display, you can then render the values in the table rows mapping over the keys to make each row, and for each feature key, you access the value from the modifiedCurrentProd or modifiedClickedProd object's features property:
<div id="table">
{allFeatureKeys.map((featureKey) => {
return <div id="table-row">
<div>{featureKey}</div>
<div>
{
modifiedCurrentProd.features[featureKey] !== undefined
? modifiedCurrentProd.id
: "n/a"
}
</div>
<div>
{
modifiedClickedProd.features[featureKey] !== undefined
? modifiedClickedProd.id
: "n/a"
}
</div>
</div>
})}
</div>
Firstly the target data structure needs to be fixed/optimized. It looks like the OP does concentrate on something which is based on a generic Feature (like Fabric, Cut, Buttons) whereas such feature values seem to be associated more with the Product. Thus for one and the same feature the values are unique to the product feature. In order to not loose the product information, a target format's feature item needs to reflect its related product's id property.
A viable and still flexible enough target data structure then might look like this ...
{
"Fabric": [{
productId: 28214,
value: "100% Cotton",
}, {
productId: 28212,
value: "Canvas",
}],
"Cut": [{
productId: 28214,
value: "Skinny",
}],
"Buttons": [{
productId: 28212,
value: "Brass",
}],
}
Any approach should start with a data-normalizing mapping-process of a product's features list where each feature item will get its product related id assigned.
Thus a feature item like { feature: "Buttons", value: "Brass" } gets mapped temporarily into { productId: 28212, feature: "Buttons", value: "Brass" }.
The two normalized data-item lists now can be concatenated and finally processed/reduced into the final target structure ...
function mergeBoundProductId(item) {
return { ...this, ...item };
}
function aggregateProductFeatureValueLists(index, productFeature) {
const { feature, ...featureValue } = productFeature;
const featureList = index[feature] ??= [];
//const featureList = index[feature] || (index[feature] = []);
featureList.push(featureValue);
return index;
}
function createIndexOfProductFeatureValues(clickedProd, currentProd) {
const { features:clickedFeatures } = clickedProd;
const { features:currentFeatures } = currentProd;
return [
...clickedFeatures.map(mergeBoundProductId, { productId: clickedProd.id }),
...currentFeatures.map(mergeBoundProductId, { productId: currentProd.id }),
].reduce(aggregateProductFeatureValueLists, {});
}
const currentProduct = {
id: 28212,
name: "Camo Onesie",
// ... more properties ...
features: [{
feature: "Fabric",
value: "Canvas",
}, {
feature: "Buttons",
value: "Brass",
}],
};
const clickedProduct = {
name: "Morning Joggers",
// ... more properties ...
id: 28214,
features: [{
feature: "Fabric",
value: "100% Cotton",
}, {
feature: "Cut",
value: "Skinny",
}],
};
console.log(
'createIndexOfProductFeatureValues(clickedProduct, currentProduct) ...',
createIndexOfProductFeatureValues(clickedProduct, currentProduct)
);
.as-console-wrapper { min-height: 100%!important; top: 0; }
The advantage of breaking the code into dedicated processes comes with easier refactoring for e.g. changed target structures like something closer to what the OP was looking for.
The changes to the reducer function are minimal. It's just two changes, each barely noticeable in its line ...
function mergeBoundProductId(item) {
return { ...this, ...item };
}
function aggregateProductFeatureValueLists(index, productFeature) {
const { feature, productId, value } = productFeature;
const featureList = index[feature] ??= [];
featureList.push([value, productId]);
return index;
}
function createIndexOfProductFeatureValues(clickedProd, currentProd) {
const { features:clickedFeatures } = clickedProd;
const { features:currentFeatures } = currentProd;
return [
...clickedFeatures.map(mergeBoundProductId, { productId: clickedProd.id }),
...currentFeatures.map(mergeBoundProductId, { productId: currentProd.id }),
].reduce(aggregateProductFeatureValueLists, {});
}
console.log(
'createIndexOfProductFeatureValues(clickedProduct, currentProduct) ...',
createIndexOfProductFeatureValues(clickedProduct, currentProduct)
);
.as-console-wrapper { min-height: 100%!important; top: 0; }
<script>
const currentProduct = {
id: 28212,
name: "Camo Onesie",
// ... more properties ...
features: [{
feature: "Fabric",
value: "Canvas",
}, {
feature: "Buttons",
value: "Brass",
}],
};
const clickedProduct = {
name: "Morning Joggers",
// ... more properties ...
id: 28214,
features: [{
feature: "Fabric",
value: "100% Cotton",
}, {
feature: "Cut",
value: "Skinny",
}],
};
</script>
The last example's purpose too is to prove the advantage of an easy to refactor code base.
Here the main function gets renamed from createIndexOfProductFeatureValues to createListOfProductFeatureValues.
It's implementation also changes likewise but only in the way how the reducer function gets invoked with its initial value.
The reducer function also does not change dramatically, only in the way of how the accumulating/aggregating collector object gets handled.
And the result is a clean array based object structure ...
function mergeBoundProductId(item) {
return { ...this, ...item };
}
function aggregateProductFeatureValueLists(collector, productFeature) {
const { feature, productId, value } = productFeature;
const { index, list } = collector;
const featureItem = index[feature] ??= { feature, values: [] };
if (featureItem.values.length === 0) {
list.push(featureItem);
}
featureItem.values.push([value, productId]);
return collector;
}
function createListOfProductFeatureValues(clickedProd, currentProd) {
const { features:clickedFeatures } = clickedProd;
const { features:currentFeatures } = currentProd;
return [
...clickedFeatures.map(mergeBoundProductId, { productId: clickedProd.id }),
...currentFeatures.map(mergeBoundProductId, { productId: currentProd.id }),
].reduce(aggregateProductFeatureValueLists, { index: {}, list: [] }).list;
}
console.log(
'createListOfProductFeatureValues(clickedProduct, currentProduct) ...',
createListOfProductFeatureValues(clickedProduct, currentProduct)
);
.as-console-wrapper { min-height: 100%!important; top: 0; }
<script>
const currentProduct = {
id: 28212,
name: "Camo Onesie",
// ... more properties ...
features: [{
feature: "Fabric",
value: "Canvas",
}, {
feature: "Buttons",
value: "Brass",
}],
};
const clickedProduct = {
name: "Morning Joggers",
// ... more properties ...
id: 28214,
features: [{
feature: "Fabric",
value: "100% Cotton",
}, {
feature: "Cut",
value: "Skinny",
}],
};
</script>
You are already looping through both once. You can get it without reducing.
const formatFeatures = (currentProd, clickedProd) => {
const formattedFeatures = {};
if (clickedProd.features) {
clickedProd.features.forEach(feature => {
const vals = Object.values(feature);
if (!formattedFeatures.hasOwnProperty(vals[0])) {
formattedFeatures[vals[0]] = [];
}
formattedFeatures[vals[0]].push([vals[1], clickedProd.id]);
});
}
currentProd.features.forEach(feature => {
const vals = Object.values(feature);
if (!formattedFeatures.hasOwnProperty(vals[0])) {
formattedFeatures[vals[0]] = [];
}
formattedFeatures[vals[0]].push([vals[1], currentProd.id]);
})
return formattedFeatures;
}
const currentProd = {
"id": 28212,
"name": "Camo Onesie",
"slogan": "Blend in to your crowd",
"description": "The So Fatigues will wake you up and fit you in. This high energy camo will have you blending in to even the wildest surroundings.",
"category": "Jackets",
"default_price": "140.00",
"created_at": "2021-07-10T17:00:03.509Z",
"updated_at": "2021-07-10T17:00:03.509Z",
"features": [{
"feature": "Fabric",
"value": "Canvas"
}, {
"feature": "Buttons",
"value": "Brass"
}]
};
const clickedProd = {
"name": "Morning Joggers",
"category": "Pants",
"originalPrice": "40.00",
"salePrice": null,
"photo": "https://images.unsplash.com/photo-1552902865-b72c031ac5ea?ixlib=rb-1.2.1&ixid=eyJhcHBfaWQiOjEyMDd9&auto=format&fit=crop&w=300&q=80",
"id": 28214,
"features": [{
"feature": "Fabric",
"value": "100% Cotton"
}, {
"feature": "Cut",
"value": "Skinny"
}]
};
console.log(formatFeatures(currentProd, clickedProd));
.as-console-wrapper { min-height: 100%!important; top: 0; }
I'd like to assign to an object within an array map
Heres the array of objects I want to add to
const arr = [
{
"key": "Mike",
"ref": 11800
},
{
"key": "Raph",
"ref": 9339
},
{
"key": "Leo",
"ref": 2560
},
]
I want to add add a new property to the object called slug while I loop over it like below. Possibly map is not the right function to use here because ESLINT complains about assigning within the map.
arr.map((item) => {
...item,
item.slug = `${item.key.toLowerCase();}/${String(item.ref)}`
});
.map() returns a new array containing the results of calling provided function for each element, so you should assign it to the new variable:
const arr = [{
"key": "Mike",
"ref": 11800
},
{
"key": "Raph",
"ref": 9339
},
{
"key": "Leo",
"ref": 2560
},
]
const newArr = arr.map(item => ({
...item,
slug: `${item.key.toLowerCase()}/${String(item.ref)}`
}))
console.dir(newArr)
If you want to add something to existing objects within an array you should use a for loop or .forEach():
const arr = [{
"key": "Mike",
"ref": 11800
},
{
"key": "Raph",
"ref": 9339
},
{
"key": "Leo",
"ref": 2560
},
]
arr.forEach(item => {
item.slug = `${item.key.toLowerCase()}/${String(item.ref)}`
})
console.dir(arr)
When mutating an array, or perform operations with side-effects, you should use a for loop or the Array.prototype.forEach method. If you want to perform pure functional operations over an array, then use Array.prototype.filter, Array.prototype.map, etc.
If you want to set a new property on the existing array elements then do this:
const arr = [ { key: "Mike", ref: 11800 }, /*etc*/ ];
for( const e of arr ) {
e.slug = e.key.toLowerCase() + "/" + e.ref.toString();
}
If you want to generate a new array with new members, then do this:
const arr = [ { key: "Mike", ref: 11800 }, /*etc*/ ];
// Note the parentheses within `map` to avoid ambiguous syntax:
const newArr = arr.map( e => ( { slug: e.key.toLowerCase() + "/" + e.ref.toString() } ) );
console.log( newArr ); // [ { slug: "mike/11800" } ]
Alternatively, to copy over all properties and then add new properties use Object.assign:
const arr = [ { key: "Mike", ref: 11800 }, /*etc*/ ];
const newArr = arr.map( e => Object.assign( {}, e, { slug: e.key.toLowerCase() + "/" + e.ref.toString() } ) );
console.log( newArr ); // [ { key: "Mike", ref: 11800, slug: "mike/11800" } ]
I have a React component which is access JSON data for populate a tree component. The tree is showing nodes and ports. Here is a sample from the JSON:
"outputs": {
"graph": {
"nodes":[ {
"name":"nlabme3400",
"ports":[ {
"name": "GigabitEthernet 0/2", "id": "5bd350c7-d15b-4f8b-be70-18eda2bfe41a"
}
,
{
"name": "FastEthernet 0/19", "id": "5bd350c7-762d-4462-984b-e6f0a9edb6c7"
}
,
{
"name": "FastEthernet 0/21", "id": "5bd350c7-2927-43db-ae43-119b12636de6"
}
],
"id":"5bd350bf-8515-4dc2-9b12-16b221505593"
}
I have all of this information coming in to my component via the following axios get call:
axios.get('StepThreeFinalData.json').then(response => {
const nodess = response.data.outputs.graph.nodes.map(({id, name,
...children}) => ({value: id, label: name, children: children.ports}));
The output is working perfectly. However, the challenge is that I need to change the "name" and "id" tags in the children array to "label" and "value", respectively, because otherwise the label will not show up in the tree component. Not sure how to do this. Please help!
const ports = [ {
"name": "GigabitEthernet 0/2", "id": "5bd350c7-d15b-4f8b-be70-18eda2bfe41a"
}
,
{
"name": "FastEthernet 0/19", "id": "5bd350c7-762d-4462-984b-e6f0a9edb6c7"
}
,
{
"name": "FastEthernet 0/21", "id": "5bd350c7-2927-43db-ae43-119b12636de6"
}
]
const update_ports = (ports) => ports.map(({ id, name }) => {
return { label: name, value: id }
})
console.log(update_ports(ports)) // The new ports with the new keys and values.
You can use the map function and return new array of objects with new keys and values in each item in the array.
axios.get('StepThreeFinalData.json').then(response => {
const nodess = response.data.outputs.graph.nodes.map(({id, name,
...children}) => ({value: id, label: name, children: update_ports(children.ports)}));
Notice i've called to update_ports in your axios success.
const test = {
"outputs": {
"graph": {
"nodes": [{
"name":"nlabme3400",
"ports": [
{
"name": "GigabitEthernet 0/2", "id": "5bd350c7-d15b-4f8b-be70-18eda2bfe41a"
},
{
"name": "FastEthernet 0/19", "id": "5bd350c7-762d-4462-984b-e6f0a9edb6c7"
},
{
"name": "FastEthernet 0/21", "id": "5bd350c7-2927-43db-ae43-119b12636de6"
}
],
"id":"5bd350bf-8515-4dc2-9b12-16b221505593"
}]
}
}
};
const test2 = test.outputs.graph.nodes.map(({name, ports, id}) => ({
name,
id,
ports: ports.map(({name, id}) => ({
label: name,
value: id
}))
}));
console.log(test2);
Read more about map, filter, reduce, that will save your life
axios.get('StepThreeFinalData.json').then(response => {
const nodess = response.data.outputs.graph.nodes.map(({id, name,
...children}) => ({value: id, label: name, children: update_ports(children.ports)}));