We Keep Coding

moving a key value pair out of an array

I am trying to move everything in the Array Results outside and into the original object
this is the object
{
"Name": "John",
"Results": [
{
"Type": "DB",
"Immediate_Action": "No",
}
]
}
It should look like this
{
"Name": "John",
"Type": "DB",
"Immediate_Action": "No",
}
What I have so far is this
const mapOscarResults = ({ data }) => {
return data.map(entry => {
let mapped = {...entry};
entry.Results.forEach(key => {
let Type = mapped[key.Type]
if (mapped[key]) {
mapped[key].push(entry.Results[key]);
} else {
mapped[key] = [entry.Results[key]];
}
});
return mapped;
});
};

You can simply spread the Results array into an Object.assign() call.
const input = { "Name": "John", "Results": [{ "Type": "DB", "Immediate_Action": "No", }, { "Another": "value" }] };
const { Results, ...refactored } = input;
Object.assign(refactored, ...Results);
console.log(refactored)

This code works for your example:
const { Results: results, ...rest } = {
"Name": "John",
"Results": [
{
"Type": "DB",
"Immediate_Action": "No",
}
]
}
const res = {...rest, ...results.reduce((prev, curr) => ({
...prev,
...curr
}), {})}
console.log(res)
But I don't know what you expect when the Results array has more than one element.
In that condition, if this code does not fill your needs, ask me to change it.

however, it will join first Result with index 0, you can expand it
const data = {
"Name": "John",
"Results": [
{
"Type": "DB",
"Immediate_Action": "No",
}
]
}
const mapOscarResults = (data) => {
for (let i in Object.keys(data)){
if (Array.isArray(data[Object.keys(data)[i]])){
newKey = data[Object.keys(data)[i]][0]
data = {... data, ...newKey}
delete data[Object.keys(data)[i]]
}
}
return data
};
console.log(mapOscarResults(data))

Array of object into a nested object for every value in the array

Trying to turn an array of objects into a nested object. Is there a good method for this? and how do I make it depending on the array length?
Working but is not universal:
https://codesandbox.io/s/thirsty-roentgen-3mdcjv?file=/src/App.js
What I have:
sorting: [
{
"id": "HighestDegree",
"options": [
"HighSchool",
"Undergraduate",
"Bachelor",
"Master",
"Doctor"
]
},
{
"id": "gender",
"options": [
"male",
"female"
]
}
]
What I want:
value: {
"Region": "Oklahoma",
"HighestDegree": {
"HighSchool": {
"male": null,
"female":null
},
"Undergraduate":{
"male": null,
"female":null
}
//and so on...
}
}
The code beneath works but is hardcoded for only two different options. I want it to be able to nest the length of the array. So lets say another object was age it would be {"HighSchool":{male:{"<25":null,"25-35":null}}} etc..
function testSortingArray() {
let sorting = [
{
id: "HighestDegree",
options: ["HighSchool", "Undergraduate", "Bachelor", "Master", "Doctor"]
},
{
id: "gender",
options: ["male", "female"]
}
];
let GoalArray = {};
if (sorting.length > 0) {
sorting[0].options.map((firstArray) => {
let currObject = {};
sorting[1].options.map((secondOption) => {
currObject[secondOption] = null;
});
GoalArray[firstArray] = currObject;
});
}
return GoalArray;
}
console.log(testSortingArray());

You can do it with a recursive function.
The function below reduces every options array to an object, and then continues populating that object if there are rest elements left from the original sorting array.
const fn = ([{ options }, ...rest]) => options.reduce((a, v) => ({
...a,
[v]: rest.length ? fn(rest): null
}), {});
const result = fn(sorting);
Besides the reduce() method, the code above makes use of object and array destructuring and spread syntax.
Complete snippet:
const sorting = [{
"id": "HighestDegree",
"options": [
"HighSchool",
"Undergraduate",
"Bachelor",
"Master",
"Doctor"
]
}, {
"id": "gender",
"options": [
"male",
"female"
]
}, {
"id": "age",
"options": [
"<25",
"25-35"
]
}];
const fn = ([{ options }, ...rest]) => options.reduce((a, v) => ({
...a,
[v]: rest.length ? fn(rest): null
}), {});
const result = fn(sorting);
console.log(result);

How do I take an array of objects and reduce it so that data at a repeated object key is combined?

I'm working on a react app that mimics a retail website. My main page displays an item, and below has card components of related products. When I click a button on one of the related products, I open a comparison modal that compares features of the current product and the clicked upon product. I figured that to accomplish this, I would create an array of the combined features of the clicked on product and the main page product. I've been struggling to get create an array of objects, where each unique feature has an object with data inside about the features and which product the feature belongs to.
As of right now, I've been able to get an array of all the features that the two products have, but this array has repeats if the products have overlapping features. This makes me unsure of how to render the comparison table because I was planning on mapping over the array and creating a table row for each feature. My current code to format these features is as follows:
formatFeatures: (currentProd, clickedProd) => {
let combinedFeatures = [];
if (clickedProd.features) {
clickedProd.features.forEach(feature => {
let obj = {}
let vals = Object.values(feature);
obj[vals[0]] = [vals[1], clickedProd.id]
combinedFeatures.push(obj)
})
}
currentProd.features.forEach(feature => {
let obj = {}
let vals = Object.values(feature);
obj[vals[0]] = [vals[1], currentProd.id]
combinedFeatures.push(obj)
})
let formattedFeatures = combinedFeatures.reduce((allFeatures, feature) => {
if (Object.keys(feature) in allFeatures) {
allFeatures = [allFeatures[Object.keys(feature)]].concat(feature);
} else {
allFeatures.push(feature);
}
return allFeatures;
}, [])
The result of this is:
[{
"Fabric": ["100% Cotton", 28214]
}, {
"Cut": ["Skinny", 28214]
}, {
"Fabric": ["Canvas", 28212]
}, {
"Buttons": ["Brass", 28212]
}]
This is pretty close to what I am looking for, where I have an array of objects that contain information about the feature and product id of the product, but the repeat in "Fabric" is something I'm struggling to sort out. Ideally, the result would look like this:
[{
"Fabric": ["100% Cotton", 28214],
["Canvas", 28212]
}, {
"Cut": ["Skinny", 28214]
}, {
"Buttons": ["Brass", 28212]
}]
If anyone can help guide me as to how to change my formatting function to accomplish this, I'd be very grateful. Alternatively, if anyone knows a better way to dynamically format a table with a single row for each unique feature given my current result, that would be great too.
The data coming into my helper function is as follows:
CurrentProd:
{
"id": 28212,
"name": "Camo Onesie",
"slogan": "Blend in to your crowd",
"description": "The So Fatigues will wake you up and fit you in. This high energy camo will have you blending in to even the wildest surroundings.",
"category": "Jackets",
"default_price": "140.00",
"created_at": "2021-07-10T17:00:03.509Z",
"updated_at": "2021-07-10T17:00:03.509Z",
"features": [{
"feature": "Fabric",
"value": "Canvas"
}, {
"feature": "Buttons",
"value": "Brass"
}]
}
ClickedProd:
{
"name": "Morning Joggers",
"category": "Pants",
"originalPrice": "40.00",
"salePrice": null,
"photo": "https://images.unsplash.com/photo-1552902865-b72c031ac5ea?ixlib=rb-1.2.1&ixid=eyJhcHBfaWQiOjEyMDd9&auto=format&fit=crop&w=300&q=80",
"id": 28214,
"features": [{
"feature": "Fabric",
"value": "100% Cotton"
}, {
"feature": "Cut",
"value": "Skinny"
}]
}

There seems to be a bigger question of how to structure your data. You say that ideally your results would look like:
[
{
"Fabric":
["100% Cotton",28214],
["Canvas",28212]
},
{
"Cut":
["Skinny",28214]
},
{
"Buttons":
["Brass",28212]
}
]
But what you're really trying to get out of this is a combined list of rows and associated values for each item feature, if it exists. All you really need then is an array of keys for each row you want to display, and objects that let you access the needed property by that key.
The array of keys could look like this:
["Fabric", "Cut", "Buttons"]
The objects you want to access the properties using those keys, for example your CurrentProd, could be this (notice that you can access a feature by calling CurrentProd.features["FeatureName"]):
{
"id":28212,
"name":"Camo Onesie",
// ... //
"features": {
"Fabric": "Canvas",
"Buttons": "Brass"
}
}
Having said that, to get those things you can get the array of keys, which we'll call allFeatureKeys, by reducing over a combined array of CurrentProd.features and ClickedProd.features:
const allFeatureKeys = [
...CurrentProd.features,
...ClickedProd.features
].reduce((acc, cur) => {
return acc.findIndex(cur.feature) > -1 ? [...acc, cur.feature] : acc
},
[]
);
And you can modify your CurrentProd to the above data shape by reducing over the array of its features, let's call this modifiedCurrentProd:
const modifiedCurrentProd = {
...CurrentProd,
features: CurrentProd.features.reduce((acc, cur) => {
return {...acc, [cur.feature]: cur.value}
}, {})
}
Repeat that for a modifiedClickedProd object, then you have both CurrentProd.features and ClickedProd.features values available for a lookup when you create your table values.
As an example only, since I don't know your react structure or what data you want to display, you can then render the values in the table rows mapping over the keys to make each row, and for each feature key, you access the value from the modifiedCurrentProd or modifiedClickedProd object's features property:
<div id="table">
{allFeatureKeys.map((featureKey) => {
return <div id="table-row">
<div>{featureKey}</div>
<div>
{
modifiedCurrentProd.features[featureKey] !== undefined
? modifiedCurrentProd.id
: "n/a"
}
</div>
<div>
{
modifiedClickedProd.features[featureKey] !== undefined
? modifiedClickedProd.id
: "n/a"
}
</div>
</div>
})}
</div>

Firstly the target data structure needs to be fixed/optimized. It looks like the OP does concentrate on something which is based on a generic Feature (like Fabric, Cut, Buttons) whereas such feature values seem to be associated more with the Product. Thus for one and the same feature the values are unique to the product feature. In order to not loose the product information, a target format's feature item needs to reflect its related product's id property.
A viable and still flexible enough target data structure then might look like this ...
{
"Fabric": [{
productId: 28214,
value: "100% Cotton",
}, {
productId: 28212,
value: "Canvas",
}],
"Cut": [{
productId: 28214,
value: "Skinny",
}],
"Buttons": [{
productId: 28212,
value: "Brass",
}],
}
Any approach should start with a data-normalizing mapping-process of a product's features list where each feature item will get its product related id assigned.
Thus a feature item like { feature: "Buttons", value: "Brass" } gets mapped temporarily into { productId: 28212, feature: "Buttons", value: "Brass" }.
The two normalized data-item lists now can be concatenated and finally processed/reduced into the final target structure ...
function mergeBoundProductId(item) {
return { ...this, ...item };
}
function aggregateProductFeatureValueLists(index, productFeature) {
const { feature, ...featureValue } = productFeature;
const featureList = index[feature] ??= [];
//const featureList = index[feature] || (index[feature] = []);
featureList.push(featureValue);
return index;
}
function createIndexOfProductFeatureValues(clickedProd, currentProd) {
const { features:clickedFeatures } = clickedProd;
const { features:currentFeatures } = currentProd;
return [
...clickedFeatures.map(mergeBoundProductId, { productId: clickedProd.id }),
...currentFeatures.map(mergeBoundProductId, { productId: currentProd.id }),
].reduce(aggregateProductFeatureValueLists, {});
}
const currentProduct = {
id: 28212,
name: "Camo Onesie",
// ... more properties ...
features: [{
feature: "Fabric",
value: "Canvas",
}, {
feature: "Buttons",
value: "Brass",
}],
};
const clickedProduct = {
name: "Morning Joggers",
// ... more properties ...
id: 28214,
features: [{
feature: "Fabric",
value: "100% Cotton",
}, {
feature: "Cut",
value: "Skinny",
}],
};
console.log(
'createIndexOfProductFeatureValues(clickedProduct, currentProduct) ...',
createIndexOfProductFeatureValues(clickedProduct, currentProduct)
);
.as-console-wrapper { min-height: 100%!important; top: 0; }
The advantage of breaking the code into dedicated processes comes with easier refactoring for e.g. changed target structures like something closer to what the OP was looking for.
The changes to the reducer function are minimal. It's just two changes, each barely noticeable in its line ...
function mergeBoundProductId(item) {
return { ...this, ...item };
}
function aggregateProductFeatureValueLists(index, productFeature) {
const { feature, productId, value } = productFeature;
const featureList = index[feature] ??= [];
featureList.push([value, productId]);
return index;
}
function createIndexOfProductFeatureValues(clickedProd, currentProd) {
const { features:clickedFeatures } = clickedProd;
const { features:currentFeatures } = currentProd;
return [
...clickedFeatures.map(mergeBoundProductId, { productId: clickedProd.id }),
...currentFeatures.map(mergeBoundProductId, { productId: currentProd.id }),
].reduce(aggregateProductFeatureValueLists, {});
}
console.log(
'createIndexOfProductFeatureValues(clickedProduct, currentProduct) ...',
createIndexOfProductFeatureValues(clickedProduct, currentProduct)
);
.as-console-wrapper { min-height: 100%!important; top: 0; }
<script>
const currentProduct = {
id: 28212,
name: "Camo Onesie",
// ... more properties ...
features: [{
feature: "Fabric",
value: "Canvas",
}, {
feature: "Buttons",
value: "Brass",
}],
};
const clickedProduct = {
name: "Morning Joggers",
// ... more properties ...
id: 28214,
features: [{
feature: "Fabric",
value: "100% Cotton",
}, {
feature: "Cut",
value: "Skinny",
}],
};
</script>
The last example's purpose too is to prove the advantage of an easy to refactor code base.
Here the main function gets renamed from createIndexOfProductFeatureValues to createListOfProductFeatureValues.
It's implementation also changes likewise but only in the way how the reducer function gets invoked with its initial value.
The reducer function also does not change dramatically, only in the way of how the accumulating/aggregating collector object gets handled.
And the result is a clean array based object structure ...
function mergeBoundProductId(item) {
return { ...this, ...item };
}
function aggregateProductFeatureValueLists(collector, productFeature) {
const { feature, productId, value } = productFeature;
const { index, list } = collector;
const featureItem = index[feature] ??= { feature, values: [] };
if (featureItem.values.length === 0) {
list.push(featureItem);
}
featureItem.values.push([value, productId]);
return collector;
}
function createListOfProductFeatureValues(clickedProd, currentProd) {
const { features:clickedFeatures } = clickedProd;
const { features:currentFeatures } = currentProd;
return [
...clickedFeatures.map(mergeBoundProductId, { productId: clickedProd.id }),
...currentFeatures.map(mergeBoundProductId, { productId: currentProd.id }),
].reduce(aggregateProductFeatureValueLists, { index: {}, list: [] }).list;
}
console.log(
'createListOfProductFeatureValues(clickedProduct, currentProduct) ...',
createListOfProductFeatureValues(clickedProduct, currentProduct)
);
.as-console-wrapper { min-height: 100%!important; top: 0; }
<script>
const currentProduct = {
id: 28212,
name: "Camo Onesie",
// ... more properties ...
features: [{
feature: "Fabric",
value: "Canvas",
}, {
feature: "Buttons",
value: "Brass",
}],
};
const clickedProduct = {
name: "Morning Joggers",
// ... more properties ...
id: 28214,
features: [{
feature: "Fabric",
value: "100% Cotton",
}, {
feature: "Cut",
value: "Skinny",
}],
};
</script>

You are already looping through both once. You can get it without reducing.
const formatFeatures = (currentProd, clickedProd) => {
const formattedFeatures = {};
if (clickedProd.features) {
clickedProd.features.forEach(feature => {
const vals = Object.values(feature);
if (!formattedFeatures.hasOwnProperty(vals[0])) {
formattedFeatures[vals[0]] = [];
}
formattedFeatures[vals[0]].push([vals[1], clickedProd.id]);
});
}
currentProd.features.forEach(feature => {
const vals = Object.values(feature);
if (!formattedFeatures.hasOwnProperty(vals[0])) {
formattedFeatures[vals[0]] = [];
}
formattedFeatures[vals[0]].push([vals[1], currentProd.id]);
})
return formattedFeatures;
}
const currentProd = {
"id": 28212,
"name": "Camo Onesie",
"slogan": "Blend in to your crowd",
"description": "The So Fatigues will wake you up and fit you in. This high energy camo will have you blending in to even the wildest surroundings.",
"category": "Jackets",
"default_price": "140.00",
"created_at": "2021-07-10T17:00:03.509Z",
"updated_at": "2021-07-10T17:00:03.509Z",
"features": [{
"feature": "Fabric",
"value": "Canvas"
}, {
"feature": "Buttons",
"value": "Brass"
}]
};
const clickedProd = {
"name": "Morning Joggers",
"category": "Pants",
"originalPrice": "40.00",
"salePrice": null,
"photo": "https://images.unsplash.com/photo-1552902865-b72c031ac5ea?ixlib=rb-1.2.1&ixid=eyJhcHBfaWQiOjEyMDd9&auto=format&fit=crop&w=300&q=80",
"id": 28214,
"features": [{
"feature": "Fabric",
"value": "100% Cotton"
}, {
"feature": "Cut",
"value": "Skinny"
}]
};
console.log(formatFeatures(currentProd, clickedProd));
.as-console-wrapper { min-height: 100%!important; top: 0; }

map and deep object with Ramda

I need to filter by "segments" properties, in this case i need to filtering by segment : [name: "general]
I Have following array
const lines = [{
id: 1191,
name: "dev",
segments: []
},
{
id: 1192,
name: "credit",
folder: "Embarazadas",
segments: [{
"name": "general",
},
{
"name": "custom",
}
]
},
{
id: 1311,
name: "box",
segments: [{
"name": "custom",
"line_id": 1431,
"id": 21,
"active": true
}]
},
{
id: 2000,
name: "sin folder",
folder: null,
segments: [{
"name": "custom",
},
{
"name": "general",
}
],
},
{
id: 2000,
name: "credit card",
segments: [{
"name": "general",
}],
},
]
I need to get all objects with segment "general"
i tried with Ramda doing this but i did not get the result, first i did a maps of the lines, and then a filter.
The problem is that sometimes segments attribute arrives empty
const filterLinesBySegments = (lines) => {
const filter = (line) => {
const hasSegments =R.filter(seg => seg["name"] === "general")(line.segments)
const newLine = R.compose(
R.assoc("segments", hasSegments),
)(line)
return newLine
}
const new= R.map(item => {
return R.filter(line => {
return filter(line)
})(item)
})(lines)
return new;
}

To keep only lines which has a general segment, you can use R.filter, with R.where to filter by a specific property. Since segments is an array, use R.any to search if some of the objects has the name of general.
To remove custom from segment you can evolve the object's segments, and reject all items with name: custom.
const { filter, where, any, propEq, reject, evolve, pipe, map } = R
const filterLinesBySegments = filter(where({
segments: any(propEq('name', 'general'))
}))
const filterCustomFromSegments = evolve({
segments: reject(propEq('name', 'custom'))
})
const fn = pipe(
filterLinesBySegments,
map(filterCustomFromSegments),
)
const lines = [{"id":1191,"name":"dev","segments":[]},{"id":1192,"name":"credit","folder":"Embarazadas","segments":[{"name":"general"},{"name":"custom"}]},{"id":1311,"name":"box","segments":[{"name":"custom","line_id":1431,"id":21,"active":true}]},{"id":2000,"name":"sin folder","folder":null,"segments":[{"name":"custom"},{"name":"general"}]},{"id":2000,"name":"credit card","segments":[{"name":"general"}]}]
const result = fn(lines)
console.log(result)
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/ramda/0.27.0/ramda.js"></script>

Javascript destructure with computed values, level shifting and new object creation

I get a json response from an api that I want to groom and create a new object from.
const things = [{
"menu": {
"id": "file",
"value": "File",
"popup": {
"menuitem": [{
"value": "3",
"onclick": "CreateNewDoc()"
},
{
"value": "5",
"onclick": "OpenDoc()"
},
{
"value": "8",
"onclick": "CloseDoc()"
}
]
}
}
},
{
"menu": {
"id": "image",
"value": "Image",
"popup": {
"menuitem": [{
"value": "New",
"onclick": "CreateNewImage()"
},
{
"value": "Open",
"onclick": "OpenImage()"
},
{
"value": "Close",
"onclick": "CloseImage()"
}
]
}
}
}
];
I know the old way of doing this like so:
const chs = [];
things.forEach((e) => {
const i = {};
i.Id = e.menu.id;
i.Value = e.menu.value;
i.PopupValue = e.menu.popup.menuitem[0].value;
i.SomethingComputed = e.menu.popup.menuitem[0].value - e.menu.popup.menuitem[1];
i.ShiftedUp = e.menu.popup.menuitem;
chs.push(ch);
});
now I want to do this using ES6 and destructuring. but I don't think I have taken it as far as I can go because I: 1)still have the loop; 2)have to create this new object; and 3) need these separate computed lines.
Can I get this more compact?
const chs = [];
things.forEach((e) => {
const {
Id: {id},
Value: {value},
PopupValue : {menu: {popup} },
} = e;
// computed
const someComputedValue = Value - PopupValue;
// new object
const ch = {
Id,
Value,
SomeComputedValue
}
chs.push(ch);
});

You can use map() instead of forEach(), so you don't need the chs.push() step at the end.
You can put the destructuring directly in the argument list, so you don't need the assignment step. Whether this is more readable is debatable.
If the calculation for SomeComputedValue isn't too complex, you can put it directly in the returned object. Then you can get rid of that assignment, and you can use the shorthand form of arrow function that just returns a value.
const things = [{
"menu": {
"id": "file",
"value": "File",
"popup": {
"menuitem": [{
"value": "3",
"onclick": "CreateNewDoc()"
},
{
"value": "5",
"onclick": "OpenDoc()"
},
{
"value": "8",
"onclick": "CloseDoc()"
}
]
}
}
},
{},
{
"menu": {
"id": "image",
"value": "Image",
"popup": {
"menuitem": [{
"value": "New",
"onclick": "CreateNewImage()"
},
{
"value": "Open",
"onclick": "OpenImage()"
},
{
"value": "Close",
"onclick": "CloseImage()"
}
]
}
}
}
];
const chs = things.map(({
menu: {
id: Id,
value: Value,
popup : PopupValue,
} = {id: "defaultID", value: "defaultValue", popup: "defaultPopup"}}) => ({
Id,
Value,
SomeComputedValue: Value - PopupValue
})
);
console.log(chs);

The non-destructuring way is actually more like this:
const chs = things.map(e => ({
Id: e.menu.id,
Value: e.menu.value,
PopupValue: e.menu.popup.menuitem[0].value,
SomethingComputed: e.menu.popup.menuitem[0].value - e.menu.popup.menuitem[1],
ShiftedUp: e.menu.popup.menuitem,
}));
And destructuring, or just the general concept of splitting stuff into more variables, doesn’t have to be all or nothing:
const chs = things.map(({menu}) => {
const {menuitem} = menu.popup;
return {
Id: menu.id,
Value: menu.value,
PopupValue: menuitem[0].value,
SomethingComputed: menuitem[0].value - menuitem[1],
ShiftedUp: menuitem,
};
});

You cannot avoid loop because things is an array so you have to iterate it. However you can avoid new object creation and pushing in chs array using the map function because it essentially creates a new element for each element of the orignial array and returns the array with newly created elements or objects in you case. So basically both looping and new object creation will be handled by the map function in this case.
Also, you can move the destructuring to the callback parameter of the map function and computation can be performed while returning the object:
const chs=things.map(({menu:{id,value,popup}}) => ({
Id: id,
Value: value,
PopupValue : popup,
SomeComputedValue: value+id
})
);
I have tested the above destructuring, it works for your things array as you provided it.

It's not pretty, but it is possible to do this using destructuring. You could create a arrow function like this which destructures each object in the array and returns a new object. Then use that as callback to map
const things=[{menu:{id:"file",value:"File",popup:{menuitem:[{value:"3",onclick:"CreateNewDoc()"},{value:"5",onclick:"OpenDoc()"},{value:"8",onclick:"CloseDoc()"}]}}},{menu:{id:"image",value:"Image",popup:{menuitem:[{value:"New",onclick:"CreateNewImage()"},{value:"Open",onclick:"OpenImage()"},{value:"Close",onclick:"CloseImage()"}]}}}];
const callback = ({
menu: {
id: Id,
value: Value,
popup: {
menuitem
}
}
}) => ({
Id,
Value,
ShiftedUp: menuitem,
PopupValue: menuitem[0].value,
SomethingComputed: menuitem[0].value - menuitem[1].value
})
console.log(things.map(callback))
You could even destrcuture the menuitem array indexes to get the first 2 values to separate variables like this:
const callback = ({
menu: {
id: Id,
value: Value,
popup: {
menuitem
},
popup: {
menuitem: [
{ value: Value0 },
{ value: Value1 }
]
}
}
}) => ({
Id,
Value,
ShiftedUp: menuitem,
PopupValue: Value0,
SomethingComputed: Value0 - Value1
})