Access object property that is outside of array - javascript

My page object is structured so that I have all of the elements in an object and then an array of objects containing data about the fields that can be looped over to test max char length and error texts.
I would like the locator to reference a property that is outside the array so that the value does not need to be updated twice if the element changed.
Snippet from page object as an example...
module.exports = {
siteName: element(by.id('P662_NAME')),
fields: [
{
name: 'site name',
max: 45,
locator: element(by.id('P662_NAME'))
}
]
}
I have tried using the following with no luck...
this.siteName, this.siteName, module.exports.siteName
Is there a way to do this?

Your exporting looks pretty good. Import it correctly.

What you could do is set siteName as another variable and reference that in your fields object like this:
let siteName = "foo"; // now, updating this variable will also update the one in fields
let fields = [{
// other props
locator: siteName
}];
console.log(fields[0].locator); // expects "foo"
// module.exports = { siteName, fields };

Try this :
Export from a file like this
Sandbox: https://codesandbox.io/s/compassionate-bas-fg1c2
var siteName = "dsdsd";
var fields = [
{
name: "site name",
max: 45,
locator: "dsdsd"
}
];
module.exports = {
siteName,
fields
};;
Get it imported like this:
import { siteName } from "./test.js";
console.log(siteName);

Related

Trying to set a value by referencing separate json

Im trying to separate out the functionality of my model and the data so ive created a separate json file with a basic table
when my model builds it creates an object and i need it to create a value in it based on a value coming in:
{
"1":"apple",
"2":"banana",
"3":"orange",
"4":"grape"
}
async save (xmlOrder) {
let customerOrder = {
ID: xmlOrder.ID,
Name: xmlOrder.Name ,
ItemCode: xmlOrder.ItemCode ,
Fruit: (This set by referencing the json, based on the Item code coming in above)enter code here
}
You can import that json object in file where you're having your model, than based on input to function you can get value out of object.
let obj = {"1":"apple","2":"banana","3":"orange","4":"grape"}
function save (xmlOrder) {
let customerOrder = {
ID: xmlOrder.ID,
Name: xmlOrder.Name ,
ItemCode: xmlOrder.ItemCode ,
Fruit: obj[xmlOrder.ItemCode] || 'Not in list',
}
return customerOrder
}
console.log(save({ID:33,Name:'Name',ItemCode:'2'}))
console.log(save({ID:303,Name:'Name1',ItemCode:'21'}))

Dynamically passing JSON value to another template

I have one template, let's call it Template A that prints JSON data into a table, one column includes a button which is conditionally rendered when has_violations equals true.
An example of the table:
Table
What I want to accomplish is to take the driver_id that is associated with that particular row into the router link and have it passed onto a different template file let's call it Template B.
But how can I accomplish this using Vuex Store?
Sample JSON data:
{"driver_id":1,"driver_name":"{driver_first_name}, {driver_last_name}","driver_truck":"13","driver_trailer":"83","driver_status":"driving","has_violations":false},
{"driver_id":2,"driver_name":"{driver_first_name}, {driver_last_name}","driver_truck":"58","driver_trailer":"37","driver_status":"sleeping","has_violations":true},
{"driver_id":3,"driver_name":"{driver_first_name}, {driver_last_name}","driver_truck":"80","driver_trailer":"27","driver_status":"driving","has_violations":true},
Basic steps:
Get index of row on button click.
Get index of JSON data using value from Step 1.
Store the JSON data from Step 2 into Vuex.
Send user to Template B using router.
Retrieve data from Store when in Template B
Because you did not show your exact structure, the code below is just a basic structure.
Here's the code:
/* VUEX demo */
new Vuex.Store({
state: {
driver_data: undefined
},
mutations: {
recordDriver({ state }, payload){
state.driver_data = payload;
}
}
});
/* TEMPLATE A demo */
new Vue.component('template-a', {
data: function(){
return {
// Assume this is the JSON
driverJSON: [
{ driver_id: 1, driver_name: 'John Smith' },
{ driver_id: 2, driver_name: 'Bob John' }
]
};
},
methods: {
onButtonClicked: function(e){
const button = e.target;
const td = button.parentElement;
const tr = td.parentElement;
const indexOfTr = [...tr.parentElement.children].findIndex(row => row === tr);
const dataToStore = this.driverJSON[indexOfTr];
// Store data into $store
this.$store.commit('recordDriver', dataToStore);
// After storing, direct page using $router
this.$router.go({ ... });
}
}
});
/* TEMPLATE B demo */
new Vue.component('template-b', {
data: function(){
return {
// Get driver data using $store
driver: this.$store.state.driver_data
}
}
});
I like Yong's answer, but I would rather suggest you to pass the driverID as a prop to your route and then use a VueX getter to get the violations for the particular ID.

firebase $add() .push() .set()

I am using firebase, and angularfire.
there are so many ways to do CRUD with the Firebase Api
actually, I still don't get what is specific difference for using
$add with $firebaseArray
.push() method
.set() method
I think they are technically same, I prefer to use .set method() without knowing the exact reason, why I'd using that. is there any specific reason to not use it? what is exactly $firebaseArray did? if we could just declare basic reference variable.
in this case:
var usersRef = Ref.child('users');
$scope.createUser = function() {
$scope.userRef.child($id).set({
name: name
});
};
or
$scope.data = $firebaseArray(Ref.child('users'));
$scope.createUser = function() {
$scope.data.child($id).$add({
name: name
});
};
thank you.
If I have the following data tree in Firebase:
{
users:
{
key: { name:"bob" }
}
}
When I do an $add, I will create a new item in the tree
$scope.data.child('users').$add({
name: name
});
Since $add uses the Push method in Firebase, new random Key will be used when pushing data to the child.
{
users:
{[
key: { name:"bob" },
key2: { name:"name" }
]}
}
If I do a set on the same Users object, I will overwrite the data that is already there. So, in your example, without specifying a key, you will overwrite the entire user object.
$scope.userRef.child('users').set({
name: name
});
};
This will result with this data
{
users:
{
name: "name"
}
}
This happens because any null values you pass to the Set method will delete any data that was originally there.
Passing null to set() will remove the data at the specified location.
https://www.firebase.com/docs/web/api/firebase/set.html

Javascript reset object inside array

I have the below JS code in my Ember app that gets called;
myPanels.accordionPanels = [];
myPanels.accordionPanels.push({
panel: {
name: "my-grid",
type: 'comp',
props: [{
key: 'elementId',
value: "myCustomId"
}]
}
});
So as you can see, I start by setting myPanels.accordionPanels = [] every time and then push the object.
However, I got the following error
Assertion Failed: Attempted to register a view with an id already in
use: myCustomId
So I am assuming that the object inside is not getting reset & it is able to find the earlier created "myCustomId".
Am I resetting the array (or rather the object inside it) correctly ?
Since I am able to push values using:
accordionPanels = [];
accordionPanels.push({
panel: {
name: "my-grid",
type: 'comp',
props: [{
key: 'elementId',
value: "myCustomId"
}]
}
});
make sure myPanels.accordionPanels doesn't have any prototype associated with it.
Try to inspect its value as:
myPanels.accordionPanels = [];
console.log(myPanels.accordionPanels); // see if it has values.
You can delete value using :
delete myPanels.accordionPanels PROTOTYPE

ExtJS creating record from existing store

I have created an ext store like so:
var store = new Ext.data.JsonStore({
root: 'vars',
fields: [{ name: 'rec_id', mapping: 'rec' }, { name: 'identity', mapping: 'id'}]
});
This works alright when I add data to the store via loadData(); and some json which looks like:
{ vars : {rec: '1', id:'John'} }
My problem is that if I use add(); to get this record into the store I have to first create it as an Ext.data.Record object.
I do this as pointed out here: https://stackoverflow.com/a/7828701/1749630 and it works ok.
The issue I have is that the records are entered with their mapped parameters rather than the ones I set. I.e, 'rec_id' becomes 'rec' and 'identity' becomes 'id'.
What am I doing wrong here?
You need to do the mapping manually, something like this:
var myNewRecord = new store.recordType({
rec_id: vars.rec,
identity: vars.id
});
store.add(myNewRecord);

Categories