I have a simple PWA, that I update and change from Github pages.
When I make an update to the website, It doesn't show on the devices using the website, because (at least I think) its being cached. I don't have any service workers to cache the site.
Even a normal refresh from the website (using all of these)
Doesn't refresh it and shows the changes. On iOS I manually have to go into settings and clear the website data to see the changes.
How can i fix this?
Use Network First (Network Falling Back to Cache)
https://developers.google.com/web/tools/workbox/modules/workbox-strategies#network_first_network_falling_back_to_cache
For requests that are updating frequently, the network first strategy is the ideal solution. By default, it will try to fetch the latest response from the network. If the request is successful, it’ll put the response in the cache. If the network fails to return a response, the cached response will be used.
When you make a page reload, a new check is done to verify if a new SW version is available.
However you need then to close all your app browser tabs in order to install the new service worker version.
In Chrome Dev Tools you can check the "Update on Reload" checkbox on the Application tab. This is useful for development.
I would suggest to read the Google docs about it.
Plus, if you want to learn more details about PWAs have a look at my articles.
UPDATE
The browser checks for updates automatically after navigations (at latest every 24h). However you can also trigger the update manually (for example you can have a timer and trigger it once per hour or according to your needs):
navigator.serviceWorker.register('/sw.js').then(reg => {
// ...
// Trigger this after your timeout
reg.update();
});
Alternatively you can use the updatefound event in order to detect in your code that a new sw version in available:
The onupdatefound property of the ServiceWorkerRegistration interface is an EventListener property called whenever an event of type statechange is fired; it is fired any time the ServiceWorkerRegistration.installing property acquires a new service worker.
navigator.serviceWorker.register('/sw.js').then(reg => {
reg.addEventListener('updatefound', () => {
const newSW = reg.installing;
newSW.addEventListener('statechange', () => {
// Check service worker state
if (newSW.state === 'installed') {
// A new SW is available and installed.
// You can update the page directly or better
// show a notification to the user to prompt for a page reload
// and inform about the new version available
}
});
});
});
Related
I'm playing with the service worker API in my computer so I can grasp how can I benefit from it in my real world apps.
I came across a weird situation where I registered a service worker which intercepts fetch event so it can check its cache for requested content before sending a request to the origin.
The problem is that this code has an error which prevented the function from making the request, so my page is left blank; nothing happens.
As the service worker has been registered, the second time I load the page it intercepts the very first request (the one which loads the HTML). Because I have this bug, that fetch event fails, it never requests the HTML and all I see its a blank page.
In this situation, the only way I know to remove the bad service worker script is through chrome://serviceworker-internals/ console.
If this error gets to a live website, which is the best way to solve it?
Thanks!
I wanted to expand on some of the other answers here, and approach this from the point of view of "what strategies can I use when rolling out a service worker to production to ensure that I can make any needed changes"? Those changes might include fixing any minor bugs that you discover in production, or it might (but hopefully doesn't) include neutralizing the service worker due to an insurmountable bug—a so called "kill switch".
For the purposes of this answer, let's assume you call
navigator.serviceWorker.register('service-worker.js');
on your pages, meaning your service worker JavaScript resource is service-worker.js. (See below if you're not sure the exact service worker URL that was used—perhaps because you added a hash or versioning info to the service worker script.)
The question boils down to how you go about resolving the initial issue in your service-worker.js code. If it's a small bug fix, then you can obviously just make the change and redeploy your service-worker.js to your hosting environment. If there's no obvious bug fix, and you don't want to leave your users running the buggy service worker code while you take the time to work out a solution, it's a good idea to keep a simple, no-op service-worker.js handy, like the following:
// A simple, no-op service worker that takes immediate control.
self.addEventListener('install', () => {
// Skip over the "waiting" lifecycle state, to ensure that our
// new service worker is activated immediately, even if there's
// another tab open controlled by our older service worker code.
self.skipWaiting();
});
/*
self.addEventListener('activate', () => {
// Optional: Get a list of all the current open windows/tabs under
// our service worker's control, and force them to reload.
// This can "unbreak" any open windows/tabs as soon as the new
// service worker activates, rather than users having to manually reload.
self.clients.matchAll({type: 'window'}).then(windowClients => {
windowClients.forEach(windowClient => {
windowClient.navigate(windowClient.url);
});
});
});
*/
That should be all your no-op service-worker.js needs to contain. Because there's no fetch handler registered, all navigation and resource requests from controlled pages will end up going directly against the network, effectively giving you the same behavior you'd get without if there were no service worker at all.
Additional steps
It's possible to go further, and forcibly delete everything stored using the Cache Storage API, or to explicitly unregister the service worker entirely. For most common cases, that's probably going to be overkill, and following the above recommendations should be sufficient to get you in a state where your current users get the expected behavior, and you're ready to redeploy updates once you've fixed your bugs. There is some degree of overhead involved with starting up even a no-op service worker, so you can go the route of unregistering the service worker if you have no plans to redeploy meaningful service worker code.
If you're already in a situation in which you're serving service-worker.js with HTTP caching directives giving it a lifetime that's longer than your users can wait for, keep in mind that a Shift + Reload on desktop browsers will force the page to reload outside of service worker control. Not every user will know how to do this, and it's not possible on mobile devices, though. So don't rely on Shift + Reload as a viable rollback plan.
What if you don't know the service worker URL?
The information above assumes that you know what the service worker URL is—service-worker.js, sw.js, or something else that's effectively constant. But what if you included some sort of versioning or hash information in your service worker script, like service-worker.abcd1234.js?
First of all, try to avoid this in the future—it's against best practices. But if you've already deployed a number of versioned service worker URLs already and you need to disable things for all users, regardless of which URL they might have registered, there is a way out.
Every time a browser makes a request for a service worker script, regardless of whether it's an initial registration or an update check, it will set an HTTP request header called Service-Worker:.
Assuming you have full control over your backend HTTP server, you can check incoming requests for the presence of this Service-Worker: header, and always respond with your no-op service worker script response, regardless of what the request URL is.
The specifics of configuring your web server to do this will vary from server to server.
The Clear-Site-Data: response header
A final note: some browsers will automatically clear out specific data and potentially unregister service workers when a special HTTP response header is returned as part of any response: Clear-Site-Data:.
Setting this header can be helpful when trying to recover from a bad service worker deployment, and kill-switch scenarios are included in the feature's specification as an example use case.
It's important to check the browser support story for Clear-Site-Data: before your rely solely on it as a kill-switch. As of July 2019, it's not supported in 100% of the browsers that support service workers, so at the moment, it's safest to use Clear-Site-Data: along with the techniques mentioned above if you're concerned about recovering from a faulty service worker in all browsers.
You can 'unregister' the service worker using javascript.
Here is an example:
if ('serviceWorker' in navigator) {
navigator.serviceWorker.getRegistrations().then(function (registrations) {
//returns installed service workers
if (registrations.length) {
for(let registration of registrations) {
registration.unregister();
}
}
});
}
That's a really nasty situation, that hopefully won't happen to you in production.
In that case, if you don't want to go through the developer tools of the different browsers, chrome://serviceworker-internals/ for blink based browsers, or about:serviceworkers (about:debugging#workers in the future) in Firefox, there are two things that come to my mind:
Use the serviceworker update mechanism. Your user agent will check if there is any change on the worker registered, will fetch it and will go through the activate phase again. So potentially you can change the serviceworker script, fix (purge caches, etc) any weird situation and continue working. The only downside is you will need to wait until the browser updates the worker that could be 1 day.
Add some kind of kill switch to your worker. Having a special url where you can point users to visit that can restore the status of your caches, etc.
I'm not sure if clearing your browser data will remove the worker, so that could be another option.
I haven't tested this, but there is an unregister() and an update() method on the ServiceWorkerRegistration object. you can get this from the navigator.serviceWorker.
navigator.serviceWorker.getRegistration('/').then(function(registration) {
registration.update();
});
update should then immediately check if there is a new serviceworker and if so install it. This bypasses the 24 hour waiting period and will download the serviceworker.js every time this javascript is encountered.
For live situations you need to alter the service worker at byte-level (put a comment on the first line, for instance) and it will be updated in the next 24 hours. You can emulate this with the chrome://serviceworker-internals/ in Chrome by clicking on Update button.
This should work even for situations when the service worker itself got cached as the step 9 of the update algorithm set a flag to bypass the service worker.
We had moved a site from godaddy.com to a regular WordPress install. Client (not us) had a serviceworker file (sw.js) cached into all their browsers which completely messed things up. Our site, a normal WordPress site, has no service workers.
It's like a virus, in that it's on every page, it does not come from our server and there is no way to get rid of it easily.
We made a new empty file called sw.js on the root of the server, then added the following to every page on the site.
<script>
if (navigator && navigator.serviceWorker && navigator.serviceWorker.getRegistration) {
navigator.serviceWorker.getRegistration('/').then(function(registration) {
if (registration) {
registration.update();
registration.unregister();
}
});
}
</script>
In case it helps someone else, I was trying to kill off service workers that were running in browsers that had hit a production site that used to register them.
I solved it by publishing a service-worker.js that contained just this:
self.globalThis.registration.unregister();
I am building an offline cross-platform using electron. It uses a service worker to make the app offline first. When I try to register the sync manager through following command:-
swRegistration.sync.register('myFirstSync')
Expected behavior
On the page with a service worker registered, this snippet should produce no errors.
navigator.serviceWorker.ready.then(function(swRegistration) {
return swRegistration.sync.register('myFirstSync');
});
Actual behavior
When running with an electron, I get
Uncaught (in promise) DOMException: Background Sync is disabled.
I need to enable sync manager. Any idea of how it can be done?
According to developers.google.com
You just have to follow this article, which is on their website and you can see it on the site by clicking here.
This is the article:
How to request a background sync
In true extensible web style, this is a low level feature that gives you the freedom to do what you need. You ask for an event to be fired when the user has connectivity, which is immediate if the user already has connectivity. Then, you listen for that event and do whatever you need to do.
Like push messaging, it uses a service worker as the event target, which enables it to work when the page isn’t open. To begin, register for a sync from a page:
//register your service worker:
navigator.serviceWorker.register('/sw.js')
//then, later, request a one-off sync:
navigator.serviceWorker.ready.then(function(swRegistration) {
return swRegistration.sync.register('myFirstSync');
});
Then listen for the event in /sw.js:
self.addEventListener('sync', function(event) {
if (event.tag == 'myFirstSync') {
event.waitUntil(doSomeStuff());
}
});
And that's it! In the above, doSomeStuff() should return a promise indicating the success/failure of whatever it’s trying to do. If it fulfills, the sync is complete. If it fails, another sync will be scheduled to retry. Retry syncs also wait for connectivity, and employ an exponential back-off.
The tag name of the sync ('myFirstSync' in the above example) should be unique for a given sync. If you register for a sync using the same tag as a pending sync, it coalesces with the existing sync. That means you can register for an "clear-outbox" sync every time the user sends a message, but if they send 5 messages while offline, you'll only get one sync when they become online. If you want 5 separate sync events, just use unique tags!
I want to create a website that can work even when it's server is offline — I found that that's what ServiceWorkers are for.
When I reload the page with service worker and no connectivity, it works just fine. However, shift+reload (e.g. bypassing cache) disarms service worker and I get "could not connect to server" error.
My question is — can I somehow prevent shift+reload (shift+f5, ctrl+f5 etc) from ruining service worker, or, at least, make it recover afterwards without restoring connectivity?
I was able to keep using the service worker even after Ctrl+F5 via the following approach:
In the window script:
navigator.serviceWorker.register(<...>).then (registration => {
if (navigator.serviceWorker.controller === null) {
// we get here after a ctrl+f5 OR if there was no previous service worker.
navigator.serviceWorker.ready.then(() => {
registration.active.postMessage("claimMe");
});
}
<...>
});
In the service script:
self.onmessage = (event) => {
if (event.data === "claimMe") {
self.clients.claim();
}
};
In short, we ask the service worker to claim all clients again, which works even for clients that used Ctrl+F5.
If you want to respect the Ctrl+F5 in the service worker code, you could either:
Clear the cache before claiming. Note that this will also affect any other existing clients, which may be unwanted.
Do something more complicated like sending the id of the client that requested a Ctrl+F5 and treat fetch requests specially for such clients.
QUICK Answer
How to make ServiceWorker survive cache reset/Shift+F5?
Theorically (*), you can do it with js plugins which detect the key hit of Ctrl or Shift... then prevent the "force refresh" to happen
...but there is a story behind this Ctrl/Shift reload.
(*) disclaimer: I've not tried this yet
LONG story... (kind of)
This is actually a spec of Service Worker. And only present in recent change of Chrome. For the earlier version of Chrome , Service Worker has no any issue surviving a "force refresh".
Along with the spec from W3C
navigator.serviceWorker.controller returns null if the request is a force refresh (shift+refresh).
Also, there are many people (**) has suggested that a "force refresh" should always clear out all kind of caches. Which is matched with the purpose of its existent and its spec.
...Furthermore, we even got it on the wikipedia...
Wikipedia: Bypassing your cache means forcing your web browser to re-download a web page from scratch
(**) us, web developers in the early stage of service worker.
In my opinion I think it is OK to let a force refresh doing its job. Since pretty much all of us always expecting the browser to not use any cache when we doing this.
I was able to solve this by detecting the ctrl+shift+r and reloading:
const wb = new Workbox(swUrl)
const wbReg = await wb.register({ immediate: true })
// workaround for ctrl + shift + r disabling service workers
// https://web.dev/service-worker-lifecycle/#shift-reload
if (wbReg && navigator.serviceWorker.controller === null) {
console.error('detected ctrl+shift+r: reloading page')
location.reload()
throw new Error('page loaded with cache disabled: ctrl+shift+r')
}
I'm playing with the service worker API in my computer so I can grasp how can I benefit from it in my real world apps.
I came across a weird situation where I registered a service worker which intercepts fetch event so it can check its cache for requested content before sending a request to the origin.
The problem is that this code has an error which prevented the function from making the request, so my page is left blank; nothing happens.
As the service worker has been registered, the second time I load the page it intercepts the very first request (the one which loads the HTML). Because I have this bug, that fetch event fails, it never requests the HTML and all I see its a blank page.
In this situation, the only way I know to remove the bad service worker script is through chrome://serviceworker-internals/ console.
If this error gets to a live website, which is the best way to solve it?
Thanks!
I wanted to expand on some of the other answers here, and approach this from the point of view of "what strategies can I use when rolling out a service worker to production to ensure that I can make any needed changes"? Those changes might include fixing any minor bugs that you discover in production, or it might (but hopefully doesn't) include neutralizing the service worker due to an insurmountable bug—a so called "kill switch".
For the purposes of this answer, let's assume you call
navigator.serviceWorker.register('service-worker.js');
on your pages, meaning your service worker JavaScript resource is service-worker.js. (See below if you're not sure the exact service worker URL that was used—perhaps because you added a hash or versioning info to the service worker script.)
The question boils down to how you go about resolving the initial issue in your service-worker.js code. If it's a small bug fix, then you can obviously just make the change and redeploy your service-worker.js to your hosting environment. If there's no obvious bug fix, and you don't want to leave your users running the buggy service worker code while you take the time to work out a solution, it's a good idea to keep a simple, no-op service-worker.js handy, like the following:
// A simple, no-op service worker that takes immediate control.
self.addEventListener('install', () => {
// Skip over the "waiting" lifecycle state, to ensure that our
// new service worker is activated immediately, even if there's
// another tab open controlled by our older service worker code.
self.skipWaiting();
});
/*
self.addEventListener('activate', () => {
// Optional: Get a list of all the current open windows/tabs under
// our service worker's control, and force them to reload.
// This can "unbreak" any open windows/tabs as soon as the new
// service worker activates, rather than users having to manually reload.
self.clients.matchAll({type: 'window'}).then(windowClients => {
windowClients.forEach(windowClient => {
windowClient.navigate(windowClient.url);
});
});
});
*/
That should be all your no-op service-worker.js needs to contain. Because there's no fetch handler registered, all navigation and resource requests from controlled pages will end up going directly against the network, effectively giving you the same behavior you'd get without if there were no service worker at all.
Additional steps
It's possible to go further, and forcibly delete everything stored using the Cache Storage API, or to explicitly unregister the service worker entirely. For most common cases, that's probably going to be overkill, and following the above recommendations should be sufficient to get you in a state where your current users get the expected behavior, and you're ready to redeploy updates once you've fixed your bugs. There is some degree of overhead involved with starting up even a no-op service worker, so you can go the route of unregistering the service worker if you have no plans to redeploy meaningful service worker code.
If you're already in a situation in which you're serving service-worker.js with HTTP caching directives giving it a lifetime that's longer than your users can wait for, keep in mind that a Shift + Reload on desktop browsers will force the page to reload outside of service worker control. Not every user will know how to do this, and it's not possible on mobile devices, though. So don't rely on Shift + Reload as a viable rollback plan.
What if you don't know the service worker URL?
The information above assumes that you know what the service worker URL is—service-worker.js, sw.js, or something else that's effectively constant. But what if you included some sort of versioning or hash information in your service worker script, like service-worker.abcd1234.js?
First of all, try to avoid this in the future—it's against best practices. But if you've already deployed a number of versioned service worker URLs already and you need to disable things for all users, regardless of which URL they might have registered, there is a way out.
Every time a browser makes a request for a service worker script, regardless of whether it's an initial registration or an update check, it will set an HTTP request header called Service-Worker:.
Assuming you have full control over your backend HTTP server, you can check incoming requests for the presence of this Service-Worker: header, and always respond with your no-op service worker script response, regardless of what the request URL is.
The specifics of configuring your web server to do this will vary from server to server.
The Clear-Site-Data: response header
A final note: some browsers will automatically clear out specific data and potentially unregister service workers when a special HTTP response header is returned as part of any response: Clear-Site-Data:.
Setting this header can be helpful when trying to recover from a bad service worker deployment, and kill-switch scenarios are included in the feature's specification as an example use case.
It's important to check the browser support story for Clear-Site-Data: before your rely solely on it as a kill-switch. As of July 2019, it's not supported in 100% of the browsers that support service workers, so at the moment, it's safest to use Clear-Site-Data: along with the techniques mentioned above if you're concerned about recovering from a faulty service worker in all browsers.
You can 'unregister' the service worker using javascript.
Here is an example:
if ('serviceWorker' in navigator) {
navigator.serviceWorker.getRegistrations().then(function (registrations) {
//returns installed service workers
if (registrations.length) {
for(let registration of registrations) {
registration.unregister();
}
}
});
}
That's a really nasty situation, that hopefully won't happen to you in production.
In that case, if you don't want to go through the developer tools of the different browsers, chrome://serviceworker-internals/ for blink based browsers, or about:serviceworkers (about:debugging#workers in the future) in Firefox, there are two things that come to my mind:
Use the serviceworker update mechanism. Your user agent will check if there is any change on the worker registered, will fetch it and will go through the activate phase again. So potentially you can change the serviceworker script, fix (purge caches, etc) any weird situation and continue working. The only downside is you will need to wait until the browser updates the worker that could be 1 day.
Add some kind of kill switch to your worker. Having a special url where you can point users to visit that can restore the status of your caches, etc.
I'm not sure if clearing your browser data will remove the worker, so that could be another option.
I haven't tested this, but there is an unregister() and an update() method on the ServiceWorkerRegistration object. you can get this from the navigator.serviceWorker.
navigator.serviceWorker.getRegistration('/').then(function(registration) {
registration.update();
});
update should then immediately check if there is a new serviceworker and if so install it. This bypasses the 24 hour waiting period and will download the serviceworker.js every time this javascript is encountered.
For live situations you need to alter the service worker at byte-level (put a comment on the first line, for instance) and it will be updated in the next 24 hours. You can emulate this with the chrome://serviceworker-internals/ in Chrome by clicking on Update button.
This should work even for situations when the service worker itself got cached as the step 9 of the update algorithm set a flag to bypass the service worker.
We had moved a site from godaddy.com to a regular WordPress install. Client (not us) had a serviceworker file (sw.js) cached into all their browsers which completely messed things up. Our site, a normal WordPress site, has no service workers.
It's like a virus, in that it's on every page, it does not come from our server and there is no way to get rid of it easily.
We made a new empty file called sw.js on the root of the server, then added the following to every page on the site.
<script>
if (navigator && navigator.serviceWorker && navigator.serviceWorker.getRegistration) {
navigator.serviceWorker.getRegistration('/').then(function(registration) {
if (registration) {
registration.update();
registration.unregister();
}
});
}
</script>
In case it helps someone else, I was trying to kill off service workers that were running in browsers that had hit a production site that used to register them.
I solved it by publishing a service-worker.js that contained just this:
self.globalThis.registration.unregister();
I have subscribed to signalr events. On notification updating textbox using $scope.$apply. Everything works fine. If page is refreshed using F5 or browser reload button, I am receiving signalr events but, textbox is not getting updated.
I am missing anything?
On notification
signalRHub.client.Notify = function (data) {
$scope.$apply(function () {
$scope.upgradeResult += data.Message;
});
}
What browser version are you using? If you are testing using IE, even the F5/Refresh would retrieve the cached page unless you change the settings under Internet Options->General tab->Browsing History subsection->Settings
By default- Check for versions of stored pages is selected as 'Automatic'. Modify this to 'Every time I visit the page' - this should bypass caching the page and changes made on the page should reflect. Although this may not resolve your impediment if caching is not the issue, but it is a useful tip to consider nevertheless to avoid caching problems.