We Keep Coding

Is there any way I can update a mounted React node's props in my current setup?

So I have a mounted React application that is rendered like this (it's via another framework on top):
const componentRender = (entryComponent, initialProps, targetNode) => {
root.render(wrapper);
}
On top level, I call a 3rd party library and wrap my React application inside of it.
What's the best way to integrate React inside of a 3rd party library that its supposed to render into?

The best practice is to update props within a component, not outside of the render function. Otherwise, as you've said, it will cause a full remount.
So the solution would be to call your Ext.extend function from within the App component.
function App() {
const [ready, setReady] = useState(false);
const [props, setProps] = useState({});
// Calls once on first mount.
useEffect(() => {
Ext.extend(Ext.Container, {
listeners: {
afterrender: function () {
setProps(this.myProps);
setReady(true);
},
},
constructor: function (...args) {
Object.assign(this, args);
},
onServerSuccess: function(data) {
// here is where I receive new data
setProps(data);
}
});
}, [])
return (
ready ? <Component {...props} /> : null
);
}
ReactDOM.render(App, rootNode);
If there is more interaction between Ext and the react component, for example you need to pass this.root into a function, you can still do that with the normal DOM APIs like document.getElementById. Or you can add it like this:
// use this reference to do stuff with the react object
this.root = <Component {...props} />
return this.root;
but changing the react component object directly would be an anti-pattern. All state/props updates should happen using APIs provided by the react library.
Also if for some reason you need to render the react component directly inside the Ext.Container node, then you should use ReactDOM.createPortal instead of render.
Here's how that would look.
import { createPortal } from 'react-dom';
const Portal = memo(({ children, domNode }) => createPortal(
children,
domNode,
));
function App() {
const [ready, setReady] = useState(false);
const [props, setProps] = useState({});
// Calls once on first mount.
useEffect(() => {
Ext.extend(Ext.Container, {
listeners: {
afterrender: function () {
setProps(this.myProps);
setReady(true);
},
},
constructor: function (...args) {
Object.assign(this, args);
},
onServerSuccess: function(data) {
// here is where I receive new data
setProps(data);
}
});
}, [])
return (
ready ?
<Portal domNode={extComponentNode}>
<Component {...props} />
</Portal> : null
);
}
Where extComponentNode is the node you want it rendered in. createPortal allows the react component to share state with your react App even though it's rendered in a different place, without the issue of calling render again.

I suppose you want to re-render the component with updated states without unmounting-mouting it whenever the prop(s) passed to the component changes.
Create a useEffect inside this component to re-render the component whenever the required prop(s) changes. To do this, add the prop(s) for which you want to re-render the component in the dependency array of useEffect and pass a function that will update the states of the component.
useEffect(
<function which will update the states, causing re-rendering of the component>,
[ <all props for which you want to run the function separated by a comma> ]
)

React: prevent function component from rerender when parents components className changes [duplicate]

When hiddenLogo changes value, the component is re-rendered. I want this component to never re-render, even if its props change. With a class component I could do this by implementing sCU like so:
shouldComponentUpdate() {
return false;
}
But is there a way to do with with React hooks/React memo?
Here's what my component looks like:
import React, { useEffect } from 'react';
import PropTypes from 'prop-types';
import ConnectedSpringLogo from '../../containers/ConnectedSpringLogo';
import { Wrapper, InnerWrapper } from './styles';
import TitleBar from '../../components/TitleBar';
const propTypes = {
showLogo: PropTypes.func.isRequired,
hideLogo: PropTypes.func.isRequired,
hiddenLogo: PropTypes.bool.isRequired
};
const Splash = ({ showLogo, hideLogo, hiddenLogo }) => {
useEffect(() => {
if (hiddenLogo) {
console.log('Logo has been hidden');
}
else {
showLogo();
setTimeout(() => {
hideLogo();
}, 5000);
}
}, [hiddenLogo]);
return (
<Wrapper>
<TitleBar />
<InnerWrapper>
<ConnectedSpringLogo size="100" />
</InnerWrapper>
</Wrapper>
);
};
Splash.propTypes = propTypes;
export default Splash;

As G.aziz said, React.memo functions similarly to pure component. However, you can also adjust its behavior by passing it a function which defines what counts as equal. Basically, this function is shouldComponentUpdate, except you return true if you want it to not render.
const areEqual = (prevProps, nextProps) => true;
const MyComponent = React.memo(props => {
return /*whatever jsx you like */
}, areEqual);

React.memo is same thing as React.PureComponent
You can use it when you don't want to update a component that you think is static so, Same thing as PureCompoment.
For class Components:
class MyComponents extends React.PureCompoment {}
For function Components:
const Mycomponents = React.memo(props => {
return <div> No updates on this component when rendering </div>;
});
So it's just creating a component with React.memo
To verify that your component doesn't render you can just
activate HightlightUpdates in react extension and check your components reaction on
rendering

We can use memo for prevent render in function components for optimization goal only. According React document:
This method only exists as a performance optimization. Do not rely on it to “prevent” a render, as this can lead to bugs.

According to react documentation:- [https://reactjs.org/docs/react-api.html][1]
React. memo is a higher order component. If your component renders the
same result given the same props, you can wrap it in a call to React.
memo for a performance boost in some cases by memoizing the result.
This means that React will skip rendering the component, and reuse the
last rendered result.
For practical understanding I came across these two videos they are very good if you wanna clear concepts also, better to watch so it'll save your time.
Disclaimer:- This is not my YouTube channel.
https://youtu.be/qySZIzZvZOY [ useMemo hook]
https://youtu.be/7TaBhrnPH78 [class based component]

react memo is not getting props

React memo isn't capturing the props neither the prevProps nor the nextProps and the component render well. The react docs say
If your function component renders the same result given the same props, you can wrap it in a call to React.memo for a performance boost.
my problem is to stop twice rendering using react memo, but memo seems to be not working and the component renders twice with the same props.
The component renders when the Create New Event is clicked on /events
here is the live sandbox.
Child Component located at /components/Event/CreateEvent/CreateEvent.js
the parent component is located at /Pages/Event/Event.js line number 999' from where the child component is being triggered
Here is the Code:
import React from "react";
import AuthContext from "../../context/global-context";
import CreateEvent from "../../components/Event/CreateEvent/CreateEvent";
function Events({ location }) {
// Sate Managing
const [allEvents, setAllEvents] = React.useState([]);
const [creating, setCreating] = React.useState(false);
// Context As State
const { token, email } = React.useContext(AuthContext);
// Creating Event Showing
const modelBoxHandler = () => {
// works on when the ViewEvent is open
if (eventSelected) {
setEventSelected(null);
return;
}
setCreating(!creating);
};
return (
<div className="events">
{/* New Event Creating */}
{creating && (
<CreateEvent onHidder={modelBoxHandler} allEvents={allEvents} />
)}
{console.log("Event Rendered.js =>")}
</div>
);
}
export default React.memo(Events, () => true);
Child Component where the Rect memo doesn't have props:
import React from "react";
import AuthContext from "../../../context/global-context";
function CreateEvent({ onHidder, allEvents }) {
// Context
const { token } = React.useContext(AuthContext);
console.log("CreatedEvent.js REnder");
return (
... Some code here
);
}
export default React.memo(CreateEvent, (prevProps, nextProps) => {
console.log("Hello", prevProps, nextProps);
});
Thanks in advance for your valuable answer and times!

The problem is that on basis of creating variable you are actually remounting and not rendering the CreateEvent component. What it means is that if creating variable changes, the component is unmounted and re-mounted when creating is true, so its not a re-render
Also you must note that modelBoxHandler function reference also changes on each re-render so even if your CreateEvent component is in rendered state and the parent re-rendered due to some reason , the CreateEvent component too will re-render
There are 2 changes that you need to make to make it work better
Define modelBoxHandler with a useCallback hook
perform conditional rendering in createEvent based on creating prop
// Creating Event Showing
const modelBoxHandler = useCallback(() => {
// works on when the ViewEvent is open
if (eventSelected) {
setEventSelected(null);
return;
}
setCreating(prevCreating => !prevCreating);
}, [eventSelected]);
...
return (
<div className="events">
{/* New Event Creating */}
<CreateEvent creating={creating} onHidder={modelBoxHandler} allEvents={allEvents} />
{console.log("Event Rendered.js =>")}
</div>
);
and in createEvent
function CreateEvent({ onHidder, allEvents, creating }) {
// Context
const { token } = React.useContext(AuthContext);
console.log("CreatedEvent.js REnder");
if(!creating) {
return null;
}
return (
... Some code here
);
}
export default React.memo(CreateEvent);

In your example, you don't have an additional render for React.memo to work.
According to your render logic, there aren't any nextProps, you unmount the component with conditional rendering (creating).
// You toggle with `creating` value, there is only single render each time
creating && <CreateEvent onHidder={modelBoxHandler} allEvents={allEvents}/>
// Works, because there will be multiple renders (nextProps)
true && <CreateEvent onHidder={modelBoxHandler} allEvents={allEvents} />
In this case, you might not need React.memo.

shouldComponentUpdate equivalent for functional component, to ignore state changes

My code has a component that takes both props and has its own internal state.
The component should rerender ONLY when its props change. State changes should NOT trigger a rerender.
This behaviour can be implemented with a class based component and a custom shouldComponentUpdate function.
However, this would be the first class based component in the codebase. Everything is done with functional components and hooks.
Therefore I would like to know whether it is possible to code the desired functionality with functional components.
After a few answers that didn't approach the real problem, I think I have to reformulate my question. Here is a minimal example with two components:
Inner takes a prop and has state. This is the component in question. It must not rerender after state changes. Prop changes should trigger a rerender.
Outer is a wrapper around inner. It has no meaning in the scope of this question and is only there to give props to Inner and to simulate prop changes.
To demonstrate the desired functionality I have implemented Inner with a class based component. A live version of this code can be found on codesandbox. How can I migrate it to a functional component:
Inner.tsx:
import React, { Component } from 'react'
interface InnerProps{outerNum:number}
interface InnerState{innerNum:number}
export default class Inner extends Component<InnerProps, InnerState> {
state = {innerNum:0};
shouldComponentUpdate(nextProps:InnerProps, nextState:InnerState){
return this.props != nextProps;
}
render() {
return (
<button onClick={()=>{
this.setState({innerNum: Math.floor(Math.random()*10)})
}}>
{`${this.props.outerNum}, ${this.state.innerNum}`}
</button>
)
}
}
Outer.tsx:
import React, { useState } from "react";
import Inner from "./Inner";
export default function Outer() {
const [outerState, setOuterState] = useState(1);
return (
<>
<button
onClick={() => {
setOuterState(Math.floor(Math.random() * 10));
}}
>
change outer state
</button>
<Inner outerNum={outerState}></Inner>
</>
);
}
The official docs say to wrap the component in React.memo. But this doesn't seem to work for preventing rerenders on state change. It only applies to prop changes.
I have tried to make React.memo work. You can see a version of the code with both Outer and Inner being functional components here.
Related questions:
How to use shouldComponentUpdate with React Hooks? : This question only deals with prop changes. The accepted answer advises to use React.memo
shouldComponentUpdate in function components : This question predates stateful functional components. The accepted answer explains how functional components don't need shouldComponentUpdate since they are stateless.

React memo do not stop state changes
React.memo only checks for prop changes. If your function component
wrapped in React.memo has a useState or useContext Hook in its
implementation, it will still rerender when state or context change.
Ref:- https://reactjs.org/docs/react-api.html#reactmemo

Your Inner component depends on the property num of the Outer component, you can't prevent it from rendering on property change as React.memo makes properties comparison:
// The default behaviour is shallow comparison between previous and current render properties.
const areEqual = (a, b) => a.num === b.num;
export default React.memo(Inner, areEqual);
By memoizing the Inner component and removing the num dependency, it won't render on Outer rendering, see sandbox attached.
export default function Outer() {
const [outerState, setOuterState] = useState(1);
return (
<>
...
// v Inner is memoized and won't render on `outerState` change.
<Inner />
</>
);
}
If you want to implement shouldComponentUpdate with hooks you can try:
const [currState] = useState();
// shouldUpdateState your's custom function to compare and decide if update state needed
setState(prevState => {
if(shouldUpdateState(prevState,currState)) {
return currState;
}
return prevState;
});

React is by design driven by setState -> re-render loop. Props change is in fact a setState somewhere in parent components. If you don't want the setState to trigger a re-render, then why in the first place use it?
You can pull in a const state = useRef({}).current to store your internal state instead.
function InnerFunc(props) {
const state = useRef({ innerNum: 0 }).current;
return (
<button
onClick={() => {
state.innerNum = Math.floor(Math.random() * 10);
}}
>
{`${props.outerNum}, ${state.innerNum}`}
</button>
);
}
That said, it's still a valid question to ask: "how to implement shouldComponentUpdate in a react hook fashion?" Here's the solution:
function shouldComponentUpdate(elements, predicate, deps) {
const store = useRef({ deps: [], elements }).current
const shouldUpdate = predicate(store.deps)
if (shouldUpdate) {
store.elements = elements
}
store.deps = deps
return store.elements
}
// Usage:
function InnerFunc(props) {
const [state, setState] = useState({ innerNum: 0 })
const elements = (
<button
onClick={() => {
setState({ innerNum: Math.floor(Math.random() * 10) });
}}
>
{`${props.outerNum}, ${state.innerNum}`}
</button>
);
return shouldComponentUpdate(elements, (prevDeps) => {
return prevDeps[0] !== props
}, [props, state])
}
Noted that it's impossible to prevent a re-render cycle when setState is called, the above hook merely makes sure the re-rendered result stays the same as prev rendered result.

you should use the event that provide the browser and capture in the function before setState, like this
function setState = (e) =>{ //the e is the event that give you the browser
//changing the state
e.preventDefault();
}

React memo keeps rendering when props have not changed

I have a stateless functional component which has no props and populates content from React context. For reference, my app uses NextJS and is an Isomorphic App. I'm trying to use React.memo() for the first time on this component but it keeps re-rendering on client side page change, despite the props and context not changing. I know this due to my placement of a console log.
A brief example of my component is:
const Footer = React.memo(() => {
const globalSettings = useContext(GlobalSettingsContext);
console.log('Should only see this once');
return (
<div>
{globalSettings.footerTitle}
</div>
);
});
I've even tried passing the second parameter with no luck:
const Footer = React.memo(() => {
...
}, () => true);
Any ideas what's going wrong here?
EDIT:
Usage of the context provider in _app.js looks like this:
class MyApp extends App {
static async getInitialProps({ Component, ctx }) {
...
return { globalSettings };
}
render() {
return (
<Container>
<GlobalSettingsProvider settings={this.props.globalSettings}>
...
</GlobalSettingsProvider>
</Container>
);
}
}
The actual GlobalSettingsContext file looks like this:
class GlobalSettingsProvider extends Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
const { settings } = this.props;
this.state = { value: settings };
}
render() {
return (
<Provider value={this.state.value}>
{this.props.children}
</Provider>
);
}
}
export default GlobalSettingsContext;
export { GlobalSettingsConsumer, GlobalSettingsProvider };

The problem is coming from useContext. Whenever any value changes in your context, the component will re-render regardless of whether the value you're using has changed.
The solution is to create a HOC (i.e. withMyContext()) like so;
// MyContext.jsx
// exported for when you really want to use useContext();
export const MyContext = React.createContext();
// Provides values to the consumer
export function MyContextProvider(props){
const [state, setState] = React.useState();
const [otherValue, setOtherValue] = React.useState();
return <MyContext.Provider value={{state, setState, otherValue, setOtherValue}} {...props} />
}
// HOC that provides the value to the component passed.
export function withMyContext(Component){
<MyContext.Consumer>{(value) => <Component {...value} />}</MyContext.Consumer>
}
// MyComponent.jsx
const MyComponent = ({state}) => {
// do something with state
}
// compares stringified state to determine whether to render or not. This is
// specific to this component because we only care about when state changes,
// not otherValue
const areEqual = ({state:prev}, {state:next}) =>
JSON.stringify(prev) !== JSON.stringify(next)
// wraps the context and memo and will prevent unnecessary
// re-renders when otherValue changes in MyContext.
export default React.memo(withMyContext(MyComponent), areEqual)
Passing context as props instead of using it within render allows us to isolate the changing values we actually care about using areEqual. There's no way to make this comparison during render within useContext.
I would be a huge advocate for having a selector as a second argument similar to react-redux's new hooks useSelector. This would allow us to do something like
const state = useContext(MyContext, ({state}) => state);
Who's return value would only change when state changes, not the entire context.
But I'm just a dreamer.
This is probably the biggest argument I have right now for using react-redux over hooks for simple apps.