My engagement-filtercontainer div used to sit directly above my engagement-graphcontainer unless it was expanded via button click, in which case it drops down into the graphcontainer overlapping. Now the engagement-filtercontainer has grown in size because of additional content and it overlaps my graph container which contained my svg. I need it to dynamically not do this even if my filter increases in size.
I have some divs that are contained in this order:
<div class="Engagement-Container">
<div class="Engagement-Body">
<div class="Engagement-Graph" id="graph">
<div class="Engagement-FilterContainer"
</div>
<div class="Engagement-GraphContainer"
<svg
class="Engagement-GraphSVG"
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"
version="1.1 ">
</svg>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
Notice that the engagement-filtercontainer and graphcontainer are both within the engagement-graph div, and that my svg is contained within the graphcontainer.
In the below image you can see that the filter now with more content expands into the area (I have hidden with css thats why im showing it in dev mode, ive tried various methods to work around this but I think i need a definitive solution.
The CSS:
engagement-graph(parent div)
.Engagement-Graph {
position: absolute;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
font-size: 100%;
vertical-align: baseline;
overflow: hidden;
#include tablet() {
width: 65%;
}
}
Engagement-graph-container (contains the svg graph that i want to protect from unwanted overlap)
.Engagement-GraphContainer {
position: relative;
width: 100%;
height: calc(100% - 56px);
top: 0;
background-color: $gray-bg-color;
transition: height $filter-slide-duration, top $filter-slide-duration;
#include tablet() {
background-color: white;
height: 100%;
}
svg {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
}
&--WithFilter {
height: calc(100% - 480px) !important;
top: 480px !important;
#include landscape {
height: calc(100% - 436px) !important;
top: 436px !important;
}
}
}
Filter-container (that is overlapping)
.Engagement-FilterContainer {
overflow: overlay;
display: table;
position: absolute;
width: 100%;
z-index: 10;
transition: transform $filter-slide-duration;
transform: translateY(-486px);
visibility: hidden;
&--Visible {
transform: translateY(0) !important;
}
#include landscape {
transform: translateY(-436px);
}
}
I wish for the filter to work as usual so when its expanded it will appear into the screen but when it is not, I don't want it encroaching upon the graph, no matter how large it gets. When the filter was smaller it was fine it never came into the screen, so it must not be dynamic in how it is sized.
Thank you if you can help.
Related
TL;DR: How to keep the div children proportional to the div itself?
I have a div, containing various elements like text, images, icons etc. It keeps 16:9 aspect ratio and fills as much viewport it can, while resizing the browser window, the div (with background different from the body background) changes size well, though the contents are staying the same size which is bad because I'm trying to make a presentation website which needs to look the same at various resolutions. How do I make the child elements align and resize properly inside the div?
I tried using viewport units though it didn't turn out really well.
My Code:
I tried using % units to set font size and then use em to scale other things but it didn't work. I also tried using only % units to set all properties but it did not work either
body {
background: black;
user-select: none;
margin: 0;
height: 100vh;
}
.container2 {
overflow: auto;
box-sizing: border-box;
resize: both;
overflow: auto;
max-width: 100%;
height: 100%;
display: flex;
justify-content: center;
}
.presentation-place {
user-select: none;
background: white;
top: 50%;
transform: translate(0, -50%);
position: absolute;
align-items: center;
aspect-ratio: 16 / 9;
}
#media screen and (max-aspect-ratio: 16 / 9) {
.presentation-place {
width: 100vw;
}
}
#media screen and (min-aspect-ratio: 16 / 9) {
.presentation-place {
height: 100vh;
}
}
.slide {
font-size: 100%;
position: absolute;
top: 0;
bottom: 0;
margin: 0 auto;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
overflow: hidden;
background: red;
background-position: center center;
}
.title1 {
margin-left: 1em;
font-size: 6em;
position: absolute;
margin-top: 2em;
}
<html>
<body>
<div class="container">
<div class="presentation-place">
<div class="slide s1">
<h1 class="title1">test</h1>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>
Make sure to avoid specific units like cm, px etc because those are fixed units no matter the scale of the site itself or the monitor, the use of Units like % since vh/vw didnt work. % scales relative to the size of the monitor or website, so this should help. Alternativly you could use aspect-ratio because it scales relative to the size of the parent element
Running the following code snippet will provide a framework for what I am visually hoping to accomplish, with some concessions made in the CSS that I'd like to remove:
body {
height: 100vh;
margin: 0;
}
.container>* {
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
flex: 0 0 50px;
}
.container {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
background-color: black;
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
align-items: flex-start;
}
.header {
background-color: red;
}
.content {
background-color: blue;
flex: 1;
position: relative;
}
.footer {
margin-top: auto;
background-color: yellow;
}
.fixedRatio {
height: 56.25vw;
max-height: calc(100vh - 100px);
width: calc((100vh - 100px) * (1/0.5625));
;
max-width: 100vw;
background-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.5);
position: absolute;
left: 0;
top: 0;
right: 0;
bottom: 0;
margin: auto;
}
<div class="container">
<div class="header"></div>
<div class="content">
<div class="fixedRatio"></div>
</div>
<div class="footer"></div>
</div>
Included are a header and footer of arbitrary height and a fixed aspect ratio box centered vertically and horizontally between them. I'd like it to letter- and pillar-box as the page is resized, and respond to increases/decreases in header height.
As it stands, the code accomplishes many of these goals but falls short in that it requires that the heights of the header and footer be included in the CSS for the fixed aspect ratio box. This limits my ability to freely manipulate the size of the header, or let it grow arbitrarily as a function of content (at least to the extent I am not using JavaScript).
I've managed to make this work successfully for the case of letter-boxing (top and bottom black bars) by leveraging the fact that the content is full-width. As a result, I can use 100vw / 56.25vw (in the case of 16:9) for the width/height and achieve the desired result. Unfortunately, when moving the content around to pillar-box, this obviously falls apart.
I've more or less resigned myself to needing JavaScript to - at the very least - toggle a class based on the dimensions of the inner content box to determine whether letter or pillar boxing is appropriate. However, it became very clear very quickly that setting width as a function of height is not trivial.
I was fortunate to come across this post, where a solution leveraging a 1x1 pixel is used to set width as a function of height.
I was able to successfully make this work for the pillar-boxing case in both Chrome and Safari, but not Firefox (IE11 and Edge not yet tested, but coverage is desired... pray for me). I'd like to get recent versions of Chrome/Safari/Firefox covered, as well as I11/Edge if possible.
The solution for Chrome/Safari is as follows:
body {
height: 100vh;
margin: 0;
}
.header,
.footer {
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
}
.container>* {
flex: 0 0 50px;
}
.container {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
background-color: black;
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
align-items: flex-start;
}
.header {
background-color: red;
}
img {
display: block;
height: 100%;
background: orange;
}
.content {
background-color: blue;
flex: 1;
position: relative;
overflow: hidden;
height: 100%;
display: inline-block;
left: 50%;
transform: translateX(-50%);
}
.footer {
margin-top: auto;
background-color: yellow;
}
.fixedRatio {
background-color: purple;
position: absolute;
left: 0;
top: 0;
right: 0;
margin: auto;
bottom: 0;
}
<div class="container">
<div class="header"></div>
<div class="content">
<img src="" />
<div class="fixedRatio"></div>
</div>
<div class="footer"></div>
</div>
There are a few things to consider. I am comfortable with fixing the height of the footer. This constraint may prove valuable, but I've been unable to yield anything from it yet. I am also comfortable with radical alterations to the included markup, supposing it enables the desired behavior.
The end-purpose of this would be to maintain fixed aspect ratio content between this flexible header, static footer, and overlay content upon it.
I am well aware that I could run some JavaScript and set these heights manually with great success, but I am coming at this from a position largely based in intellectual curiosity. If you, too, are curious, perhaps you can lend a hand in exploring :)
Thank you!
I'm making a very unique progress bar that visually looks like a glass orb filling up with liquid. Unfortunately, because of the rounded shape, the traditional method of modifying the height doesn't work so well (as demonstrated with this fiddle https://jsfiddle.net/usuwvaq5/2/).
As you can see, having the div height "slide up" is not the desired visual. I have also tried playing a bit with css clip, but was unable to get it to work for me. How can I create the visual effect of the glass "filling" with the second image?
Simply add background-position:bottom; to #inner-progress:
#inner-progress {
background-image: url(https://www.novilar.com/img/battle/ui/purification_meter_bar.png);
background-color: transparent;
background-position:bottom;
width: 100%;
overflow: hidden;
position: absolute;
bottom: 0;
height: 0%;
}
JSFiddle Demo
Jacob Gray probably has the best answer, but here's an alternative:
Fiddle
This approach uses css for the animation, instead of javascript. JS is only used here to trigger the animation, the rest is css.
This uses the css transition property to "animate" the height as it changes from 100% to 0%. The only notable change in the html is that I swapped the background of the inner with the outer.
Perhaps this answer will be a better solution to a future reader of this thread - depending on their implementation and/or preferences.
$(document).ready(function() {
$('#inner-progress').addClass("load");
});
#outer-progress {
background-image: url(https://www.novilar.com/img/battle/ui/purification_meter_bar.png);
background-color: transparent;
border: 0;
height: 100px;
width: 100px;
position: relative;
}
#inner-progress {
background-image: url(https://www.novilar.com/img/battle/ui/purification_meter_background.png);
background-color: transparent;
width: 100%;
overflow: hidden;
position: relative;
bottom: 0;
height: 100%;
transition: height 3s;
-webkit-transition: height 3s;
}
.progress-value {
color: #FFF !important;
font-weight: bold;
position: absolute;
top: 40%;
left: 40%;
}
.load{
height: 0% !important;
}
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.11.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
<div id="outer-progress">
<div id="inner-progress" value="0" max="100"></div>
<span class="progress-value">0%</span>
</div>
Here is the HTML code
.Box {
position: absolute;
bottom: 60px;
right: 0px;
left: 65px;
display: block;
background-color: #fedd2d;
max-width: 60%;
padding: 15px;
opacity: 0.8;
}
<div class="Box">
<div class="Boxtitle">Hello</div>
<div class="Boxsubtitle">Subtitle</div>
</div>
When I view this box on larger resolution (2560*1440) it expands both right side and left side. I tried using the width attribute which fixes the box from right side but the fix width hinders the responsiveness and the box width doesn't change with the length of the text within.
How can I make this Box div stay in same position in any screen size using either CSS or Javascript, also making it responsive as per the length of the content in it?
Just need to remove the right and max-width and then the width will adjust based on the content.
.Box {
position: absolute;
bottom: 60px;
left: 65px;
display: block;
background-color: #fedd2d;
padding: 15px;
opacity: 0.8;
}
right:0; seems to be in the way. it will pull container all the way to right side, but max-width is set too, so it stops at 60% of width as set. You rules are not coherent together.
since absolute, display is not really needed.
unless i missunderstand and max-width is in the way , ... or else ?
.Box {
position: absolute;
bottom: 60px;
left: 65px;
background-color: #fedd2d;
max-width: 60%;
padding: 15px;
opacity: 0.8;
}
<div class="Box">
<div class="Boxtitle">Hello</div>
<div class="Boxsubtitle">Subtitle</div>
</div>
`
I'm having some trouble with a page that has a floating background image (absolutely positioned) where the image is dynamically changed out via javascript. Basically this is a big gallery that changes behind a portfolio:
I have a section of markup that looks like this:
<div class="content">
<div class="content-container">
<div class="content-image">
<img id="galleryTarget" src="../images/main/source.jpg" class="image-resize" alt="background image"/>
</div>
...etc...
Here's the relevant CSS classes:
.image-resize {
position: absolute;
min-height: 750px;
min-width: 1000px;
width: 100%;
left: 0;
text-align: left;
vertical-align: middle;
margin-top: -25%;
top: 25%;
}
.content-image {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 200px;
width: 100%;
min-height: 750px;
max-height: 750px;
min-width:1000px;
overflow:visible;
opacity: 0.5;
z-index: 1;
}
.content-container {
position: relative;
min-height: 750px;
}
.content {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
width: 100%;
max-height: 750px;
overflow: hidden;
background: purple;
z-index: -5;
}
This is all absolutely positioned so that I can swap out the image source with Javascript and then dynamically resize the container (background) to fill the new content. There's minimum bounds so it always has a size.
What I'm trying to do is to pin this image to a CENTER point so that when it is resized the interesting parts of the image (rarely the top left corner) are displayed.
In the inspector in chrome I see that top and margin-top are never the same value even though they have the same (percentage) value. What am I missing here?
Example:
top: 187.5px and margin-top: -389.5px. It looks as though margin-top uses the img-source resolution and top uses something for the life of me I can't figure out--I'm assuming min-height + the offset in the page?
Any help here would be appreciated, this is a rather large part of the design and I'd love to have it better than what it is.
Browsers:
Chrome Version: 30.0.1599.66 m
Android Chrome: 30.0.1599.82
This does fix the problem in chrome--but I'd like to know why it is using 1000px as the baseline for the margin instead of the 750px of the unit.
/*Hack of a vector similar to 50%*/
margin-top: calc(-50% * 0.75);
top: 50%;