I'm making a very unique progress bar that visually looks like a glass orb filling up with liquid. Unfortunately, because of the rounded shape, the traditional method of modifying the height doesn't work so well (as demonstrated with this fiddle https://jsfiddle.net/usuwvaq5/2/).
As you can see, having the div height "slide up" is not the desired visual. I have also tried playing a bit with css clip, but was unable to get it to work for me. How can I create the visual effect of the glass "filling" with the second image?
Simply add background-position:bottom; to #inner-progress:
#inner-progress {
background-image: url(https://www.novilar.com/img/battle/ui/purification_meter_bar.png);
background-color: transparent;
background-position:bottom;
width: 100%;
overflow: hidden;
position: absolute;
bottom: 0;
height: 0%;
}
JSFiddle Demo
Jacob Gray probably has the best answer, but here's an alternative:
Fiddle
This approach uses css for the animation, instead of javascript. JS is only used here to trigger the animation, the rest is css.
This uses the css transition property to "animate" the height as it changes from 100% to 0%. The only notable change in the html is that I swapped the background of the inner with the outer.
Perhaps this answer will be a better solution to a future reader of this thread - depending on their implementation and/or preferences.
$(document).ready(function() {
$('#inner-progress').addClass("load");
});
#outer-progress {
background-image: url(https://www.novilar.com/img/battle/ui/purification_meter_bar.png);
background-color: transparent;
border: 0;
height: 100px;
width: 100px;
position: relative;
}
#inner-progress {
background-image: url(https://www.novilar.com/img/battle/ui/purification_meter_background.png);
background-color: transparent;
width: 100%;
overflow: hidden;
position: relative;
bottom: 0;
height: 100%;
transition: height 3s;
-webkit-transition: height 3s;
}
.progress-value {
color: #FFF !important;
font-weight: bold;
position: absolute;
top: 40%;
left: 40%;
}
.load{
height: 0% !important;
}
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.11.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
<div id="outer-progress">
<div id="inner-progress" value="0" max="100"></div>
<span class="progress-value">0%</span>
</div>
Related
My engagement-filtercontainer div used to sit directly above my engagement-graphcontainer unless it was expanded via button click, in which case it drops down into the graphcontainer overlapping. Now the engagement-filtercontainer has grown in size because of additional content and it overlaps my graph container which contained my svg. I need it to dynamically not do this even if my filter increases in size.
I have some divs that are contained in this order:
<div class="Engagement-Container">
<div class="Engagement-Body">
<div class="Engagement-Graph" id="graph">
<div class="Engagement-FilterContainer"
</div>
<div class="Engagement-GraphContainer"
<svg
class="Engagement-GraphSVG"
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"
version="1.1 ">
</svg>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
Notice that the engagement-filtercontainer and graphcontainer are both within the engagement-graph div, and that my svg is contained within the graphcontainer.
In the below image you can see that the filter now with more content expands into the area (I have hidden with css thats why im showing it in dev mode, ive tried various methods to work around this but I think i need a definitive solution.
The CSS:
engagement-graph(parent div)
.Engagement-Graph {
position: absolute;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
font-size: 100%;
vertical-align: baseline;
overflow: hidden;
#include tablet() {
width: 65%;
}
}
Engagement-graph-container (contains the svg graph that i want to protect from unwanted overlap)
.Engagement-GraphContainer {
position: relative;
width: 100%;
height: calc(100% - 56px);
top: 0;
background-color: $gray-bg-color;
transition: height $filter-slide-duration, top $filter-slide-duration;
#include tablet() {
background-color: white;
height: 100%;
}
svg {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
}
&--WithFilter {
height: calc(100% - 480px) !important;
top: 480px !important;
#include landscape {
height: calc(100% - 436px) !important;
top: 436px !important;
}
}
}
Filter-container (that is overlapping)
.Engagement-FilterContainer {
overflow: overlay;
display: table;
position: absolute;
width: 100%;
z-index: 10;
transition: transform $filter-slide-duration;
transform: translateY(-486px);
visibility: hidden;
&--Visible {
transform: translateY(0) !important;
}
#include landscape {
transform: translateY(-436px);
}
}
I wish for the filter to work as usual so when its expanded it will appear into the screen but when it is not, I don't want it encroaching upon the graph, no matter how large it gets. When the filter was smaller it was fine it never came into the screen, so it must not be dynamic in how it is sized.
Thank you if you can help.
Im currently in the process of fixing a wordpress site for a client, unfortunately I am having tons of issues with scrolling on one of the pages. I have tried time and time again to remove any scroll assist js that could be causing it but I still cant seem to get it to work.
Here is the URL for the page giving me trouble: http://www.bombaygrilloh.com/home/menu/
Any help is greatly appreciated!
You issue is background-attachment
Chris Ruppel writes:
[...] using background-attachment: fixed causes a paint operation every time the user scrolls. Why? Well, the page has to reposition the content, and then, since its background image is supposed to appear as if it’s holding still, the browser has to repaint that image in a new location relative to its actual DOM elements. The performance for this feature is so bad that iOS simply ignores this property.
The culprit is your header background image.
it is fixed and is consistently getting repainted on scroll behind your page content.
In you CSS file you have this
.section-parallax {
background-attachment: fixed;
}
If you remove that then you smooth scrolling without trouble but you loose the parallax effect.
If you must have the parallax effect then you need to either use a more efficent method for the effect or hack your way to it.
for more efficiency use jQuery. I found a pen by Marcel Schulz and copied it below for reference:
/*
See https://codepen.io/MarcelSchulz/full/lCvwq
The effect doens't appear as nice when viewing in split view :-)
Fully working version can also be found at (http://schulzmarcel.de/x/drafts/parallax).
*/
jQuery(document).ready(function() {
$(window).scroll(function(e) {
parallaxScroll();
});
function parallaxScroll() {
var scrolled = $(window).scrollTop();
$('#parallax-bg-1').css('top', (0 - (scrolled * .25)) + 'px');
$('#parallax-bg-2').css('top', (0 - (scrolled * .4)) + 'px');
$('#parallax-bg-3').css('top', (0 - (scrolled * .75)) + 'px');
}
});
body {
background: rgba(230, 231, 232, 1);
height: 4600px;
}
/* foreground (balloons/landscape)*/
div#parallax-bg-1 {
position: fixed;
width: 1200px;
top: 0;
left: 50%;
margin-left: -600px;
z-index: 1;
}
/* background middle layer*/
div#parallax-bg-2 {
position: fixed;
width: 1200px;
top: 0;
left: 50%;
margin-left: -600px;
z-index: 2;
}
/* background layer */
div#parallax-bg-3 {
position: fixed;
width: 960px;
top: 0;
left: 50%;
margin-left: -470px;
z-index: 3;
}
/* foreground */
div#parallax-bg-3 div {
background-repeat: no-repeat;
position: absolute;
display: block;
overflow: hidden;
}
div#bg-3-1 {
background: url('http://schulzmarcel.de/x/drafts/parallax/img/balloon.png');
width: 529px;
height: 757px;
top: -100px;
right: 100px;
}
div#bg-3-2 {
background: url('http://schulzmarcel.de/x/drafts/parallax/img/balloon2.png');
width: 603px;
height: 583px;
top: 1050px;
right: 70px;
}
div#bg-3-3 {
background: url('http://schulzmarcel.de/x/drafts/parallax/img/balloon3.png');
width: 446px;
height: 713px;
top: 1800px;
right: 140px;
}
div#bg-3-4 {
background: url('http://schulzmarcel.de/x/drafts/parallax/img/ground.png');
width: 1104px;
height: 684px;
top: 2800px;
right: 0px;
}
/* middle layer clouds */
div#parallax-bg-2 div {
background: url('http://schulzmarcel.de/x/drafts/parallax/img/cloud-lg1.png');
background-repeat: no-repeat;
position: absolute;
display: block;
width: 488px;
height: 138px;
overflow: hidden;
}
div#bg-2-1 {
top: 100px;
left: -310px;
}
div#bg-2-2 {
top: 270px;
right: -70px;
}
div#bg-2-3 {
top: 870px;
left: -300px;
}
div#bg-2-4 {
top: 1120px;
right: -130px;
}
div#bg-2-5 {
top: 1620px;
left: 140px;
}
div#bg-2-6 {
top: 720px;
left: 340px;
}
/*background layer clouds */
div#parallax-bg-1 div {
background-repeat: no-repeat;
position: absolute;
display: block;
width: 488px;
height: 138px;
overflow: hidden;
}
div#bg-1-1 {
background: url('http://schulzmarcel.de/x/drafts/parallax/img/cloud-sm1.png');
top: 200px;
right: 450px;
}
div#bg-1-2 {
background: url('http://schulzmarcel.de/x/drafts/parallax/img/cloud-lg2.png');
top: 420px;
left: 0px;
}
div#bg-1-3 {
background: url('http://schulzmarcel.de/x/drafts/parallax/img/cloud-sm1.png');
top: 850px;
right: -290px;
}
div#bg-1-4 {
background: url('http://schulzmarcel.de/x/drafts/parallax/img/cloud-sm1.png');
top: 1350px;
left: 200px;
}
div#bg-1-5 {
background: url('http://schulzmarcel.de/x/drafts/parallax/img/cloud-lg2.png');
top: 1200px;
left: -200px;
}
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.1.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
<html>
<head>
</head>
<body>
<div id="parallax-bg-3" class="parallax-bg">
<div id="bg-3-1"></div>
<div id="bg-3-2"></div>
<div id="bg-3-3"></div>
<div id="bg-3-4"></div>
</div>
<div id="parallax-bg-2" class="parallax-bg">
<div id="bg-2-1"></div>
<div id="bg-2-2"></div>
<div id="bg-2-3"></div>
<div id="bg-2-4"></div>
<div id="bg-2-5"></div>
<div id="bg-2-6"></div>
</div>
<div id="parallax-bg-1" class="parallax-bg">
<div id="bg-1-1"></div>
<div id="bg-1-2"></div>
<div id="bg-1-3"></div>
<div id="bg-1-4"></div>
<div id="bg-1-5"></div>
</div>
</body>
</html>
In the same article I quoted above, there is a tutorial for how to fix the issue with CSS. Instead of using background-attachment: fixed you add the background to a pseudo-element and give it postion fixed like so
.element {
position: relative;
}
.elemnt:before {
content: ' ';
position: fixed; /* instead of background-attachment */
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
top: 0;
left: 0;
background-color: white;
background: url('/img/front/strategy.jpg') no-repeat center center;
background-size: cover;
will-change: transform; /* creates a new paint layer */
z-index: -1;
}
And this will essentially limit the impact on scrolling as the "background" would have it's own independent element.
Note: If you run into issues which you cannot debug, open the dev tools and start deleting elements from the page one by one until you find the issue.
Resources:
https://www.w3.org/TR/css-will-change-1/
http://caniuse.com/#feat=will-change
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QU1JAW5LRKU
https://developers.google.com/web/tools/chrome-devtools/
From looking at your site, there are a few parts of it that are slowing down the rest. Here are a few easy ways to speed it up.
Use a CDN
A CDN (Content Distribution Network) ensures that everything is loaded faster because it doesn't depend on your own Wordpress server and will allow access times to be consistent across the world. There are a few good ones out there like CloudFlare and Incapsula. Here is an article listing a few more.
In addition, you can host your images (I see that one is coming from Wikipedia) on a slightly faster
Compress images
This step is as easy as converting photos to a .jpg. JPEG automatically compresses the data by getting rid of unnecessary information in the photos. You can also use compression software to get the file size down.
Leverage caching
Use a caching plugin (there are tons of great ones for Wordpress) to cache data on your server and can really speed up things for your site.
Search for more ways to optimize
Use tools like Pingdom and Google PageSpeed Insights to identify bottlenecks and resolve them.
Hope this helps you!
I need to make a circular border something like this code snippet / fiddle:
.box {
width: 250px;
height: 250px;
position: relative;
margin: auto;
margin: 30px;
border-radius: 50%;
background: #fff;
}
.box:after {
content: '';
position: absolute;
top: -15px;
bottom: -15px;
right: -15px;
left: -15px;
background-image: linear-gradient(to bottom left, #7B73A4 0%, #150E5E 100%);
z-index: -1;
border-radius: inherit;
}
<div class="box"></div>
except the inner space needs to be transparent and there needs to be a way of changing the border's gradient color.
I can use anything with js/jquery/css/html
Is it possible? If yes, how? Thanks
It is possible using a <canvas> element (which is supported in all browsers except for IE 8 and older).
Here are some useful links:
Canvas tutorial - MDN
Canvas API - MDN
Canvas Cheat Sheet
You could also use an SVG element, but that makes the animation much more difficult.
I'm using the background-blend-mode on this:
<a href="#" class="blend">
<h3>Title</h3>
<p>Content goes here</p>
</a>
It has a url set for the background-image. When .blend is hovered over, it changes the background to this:
.blend:hover {
background-blend-mode:multiply;
background-color: rgba(0,0,0,.6);
}
So it works, but not in IE (of course). What alternatives are there? Is there some sort of jQuery trick that I can use to get it to work in IE? Or is there a prefix I could use, say -ms- or something similar?
Not the best solution I know, but as IE and MS Edge can't use background-blend-mode (http://caniuse.com/#feat=css-backgroundblendmode).
I get around this by adding a :after class to the element and manipulating that via background-colour and playing with the opacity on the pseudo element.
DEMO
https://codepen.io/nicekiwi/pen/PmZdMK
HTML
<div class="blend"></div>
CSS
.blend {
background-image: url('http://placekitten.com.s3.amazonaws.com/homepage-samples/408/287.jpg');
background-repeat: no-repeat;
background-attachment: cover;
width: 200px;
height: 200px;
position: relative;
}
.blend:after {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
content: '';
background-color: red;
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
opacity: 0;
transition: opacity 0.3s; /* lets transition to be fancy ^_^ */
}
.blend:hover:after {
opacity: 0.3;
}
I'm having some trouble with a page that has a floating background image (absolutely positioned) where the image is dynamically changed out via javascript. Basically this is a big gallery that changes behind a portfolio:
I have a section of markup that looks like this:
<div class="content">
<div class="content-container">
<div class="content-image">
<img id="galleryTarget" src="../images/main/source.jpg" class="image-resize" alt="background image"/>
</div>
...etc...
Here's the relevant CSS classes:
.image-resize {
position: absolute;
min-height: 750px;
min-width: 1000px;
width: 100%;
left: 0;
text-align: left;
vertical-align: middle;
margin-top: -25%;
top: 25%;
}
.content-image {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 200px;
width: 100%;
min-height: 750px;
max-height: 750px;
min-width:1000px;
overflow:visible;
opacity: 0.5;
z-index: 1;
}
.content-container {
position: relative;
min-height: 750px;
}
.content {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
width: 100%;
max-height: 750px;
overflow: hidden;
background: purple;
z-index: -5;
}
This is all absolutely positioned so that I can swap out the image source with Javascript and then dynamically resize the container (background) to fill the new content. There's minimum bounds so it always has a size.
What I'm trying to do is to pin this image to a CENTER point so that when it is resized the interesting parts of the image (rarely the top left corner) are displayed.
In the inspector in chrome I see that top and margin-top are never the same value even though they have the same (percentage) value. What am I missing here?
Example:
top: 187.5px and margin-top: -389.5px. It looks as though margin-top uses the img-source resolution and top uses something for the life of me I can't figure out--I'm assuming min-height + the offset in the page?
Any help here would be appreciated, this is a rather large part of the design and I'd love to have it better than what it is.
Browsers:
Chrome Version: 30.0.1599.66 m
Android Chrome: 30.0.1599.82
This does fix the problem in chrome--but I'd like to know why it is using 1000px as the baseline for the margin instead of the 750px of the unit.
/*Hack of a vector similar to 50%*/
margin-top: calc(-50% * 0.75);
top: 50%;