I'm currently working on an AngularJS project and I got stuck in this specific requirement.
We have a service that has all the data, DataFactoryService. Then, I have a controller called DataFactoryController that is making the magic and then plot it in the view.
<div ng-repeat = "list in collection">
{{list.name}}
...
</div>
Now, we have a requirement that pass multiple data into one element. I thought an "ng-repeat" would do, but we need to have it inside an element attribute.
The scenarios are:
At one of the pages, we have multiple lists with multiple data.
Each data has a unique code or ID that should be passed when we do an execution or button click.
There are instances that we're passing multiple data.
Something like this (if we have 3 items in a list or lists, so we're passing the 3 item codes of the list):
<a href = "#" class = "btn btn-primary" data-factory = "code1;code2;code3;">
Submit
</a>
<a href = "#" class = "btn btn-default" data-factory = "code1;code2;code3;">
Cancel
</a>
In the example above, code1,code2,code3 came from the list data. I tried several approach like "ng-repeat", "angular.each", array, "ng-model" but I got no success.
From all I've tried, I knew that "ng-model" is the most possible way to resolve my problem but I didn't know where to start. the code below didn't work though.
<span ng-model = "dataFactorySet.code">{{list.code}}</span>
{{dataFactorySet.code}}
The data is coming from the service, then being called in the controller, and being plot on the HTML page.
// Controller
$scope.list = dataFactoryService.getAllServices();
The data on the list are being loaded upon initialization and hoping to have the data tags initialized as well together with the list data.
The unique code(s) is/are part of the $scope.list.
// Sample JSON structure
[
{ // list level
name: 'My Docs',
debug: false,
contents: [ // list contents level
{
code: 'AHDV3128',
text: 'Directory of documents',
...
},
{
code: 'AHDV3155',
text: 'Directory of pictures',
...
},
],
....
},
{ // list level
name: 'My Features',
debug: false,
contents: [ // list contents level
{
code: 'AHGE5161',
text: 'Directory of documents',
...
},
{
code: 'AHGE1727',
text: 'Directory of pictures',
...
},
],
....
}
]
How can I do this?
PLUNKER -> http://plnkr.co/edit/Hb6bNi7hHbcFa9RtoaMU?p=preview
The solution for this particular problem could be writing 2 functions which will return the baseId and code with respect to the list in loop.
I would suggest to do it like below
Submit
Cancel
//inside your controller write the methods -
$scope.getDataFactory = function(list){
var factory = list.map( (a) => a.code );
factory = factory.join(";");
return factory;
}
$scope.getDataBase= function(list){
var base= list.map( (a) => a.baseId);
base= base.join(";");
return base;
}
Let me know if you see any issue in doing this. This will definitely solve your problem.
You don't really have to pass multiple data from UI if you are using Angular.
Two-way data binding is like blessing which is provided by Angular.
check your updated plunker here [http://plnkr.co/edit/mTzAIiMmiVzQfSkHGgoU?p=preview]1
What I have done here :
I assumed that there must be some unique id (I added Id in the list) in the list.
Pass that Id on click (ng-click) of Submit button.
You already have list in your controller and got the Id which item has been clicked, so you can easily fetch all the data of that Id from the list.
Hope this will help you... cheers.
So basing from Ashvin777's post. I came up with this solution in the Controller.
$scope.getFactoryData = function(list) {
var listData = list.contents;
listData = listData.map(function(i,j) {
return i.code;
});
return listData.join(';');
}
Related
I have a Kendo.MVC project. The view has a model with a field of type List<>. I want to populate the List from a Javascript function. I've tried several ways, but can't get it working. Can someone explain what I'm doing wrong?
So here is my model:
public class Dashboard
{
public List<Note> ListNotes { get; set; }
}
I use the ListNotes on the view like this:
foreach (Note note in Model.ListNotes)
{
#Html.Raw(note.NoteText)
}
This works if I populate Model.ListNotes in the controller when the view starts...
public ActionResult DashBoard(string xsr, string vst)
{
var notes = rep.GetNotesByCompanyID(user.ResID, 7, 7);
List<Koorsen.Models.Note> listNotes = new List<Koorsen.Models.Note>();
Dashboard employee = new Dashboard
{
ResID = intUser,
Type = intType,
FirstName = user.FirstName,
LastName = user.LastName,
ListNotes = listNotes
};
return View(employee);
}
... but I need to populate ListNotes in a Javascript after a user action.
Here is my javascript to make an ajax call to populate ListNotes:
function getReminders(e)
{
var userID = '#ViewBag.CurrUser';
$.ajax({
url: "/api/WoApi/GetReminders/" + userID,
dataType: "json",
type: "GET",
success: function (notes)
{
// Need to assign notes to Model.ListNotes here
}
});
}
Here's the method it calls with the ajax call. I've confirmed ListNotes does have the values I want; it is not empty.
public List<Koorsen.Models.Note> GetReminders(int id)
{
var notes = rep.GetNotesByCompanyID(id, 7, 7);
List<Koorsen.Models.Note> listNotes = new List<Koorsen.Models.Note>();
foreach (Koorsen.OpenAccess.Note note in notes)
{
Koorsen.Models.Note newNote = new Koorsen.Models.Note()
{
NoteID = note.NoteID,
CompanyID = note.CompanyID,
LocationID = note.LocationID,
NoteText = note.NoteText,
NoteType = note.NoteType,
InternalNote = note.InternalNote,
NoteDate = note.NoteDate,
Active = note.Active,
AddBy = note.AddBy,
AddDate = note.AddDate,
ModBy = note.ModBy,
ModDate = note.ModDate
};
listNotes.Add(newNote);
}
return listNotes;
}
If ListNotes was a string, I would have added a hidden field and populated it in Javascript. But that didn't work for ListNotes. I didn't get an error, but the text on the screen didn't change.
#Html.HiddenFor(x => x.ListNotes)
...
...
$("#ListNotes").val(notes);
I also tried
#Model.ListNotes = notes; // This threw an unterminated template literal error
document.getElementById('ListNotes').value = notes;
I've even tried refreshing the page after assigning the value:
window.location.reload();
and refreshing the panel bar the code is in
var panelBar = $("#IntroPanelBar").data("kendoPanelBar");
panelBar.reload();
Can someone explain how to get this to work?
I don't know if this will cloud the issue, but the reason I need to populate the model in javascript with an ajax call is because Model.ListNotes is being used in a Kendo Panel Bar control and I don't want Model.ListNotes to have a value until the user expands the panel bar.
Here's the code for the panel bar:
#{
#(Html.Kendo().PanelBar().Name("IntroPanelBar")
.Items(items =>
{
items
.Add()
.Text("View Important Notes and Messages")
.Expanded(false)
.Content(
#<text>
#RenderReminders()
</text>
);
}
)
.Events(e => e
.Expand("getReminders")
)
)
}
Here's the helper than renders the contents:
#helper RenderReminders()
{
if (Model.ListNotes.Count <= 0)
{
#Html.Raw("No Current Messages");
}
else
{
foreach (Note note in Model.ListNotes)
{
#Html.Raw(note.NoteText)
<br />
}
}
}
The panel bar and the helpers work fine if I populate Model.ListNotes in the controller and pass Model to the view. I just can't get it to populate in the javascript after the user expands the panel bar.
Perhaps this will do it for you. I will provide a small working example I believe you can easily extend to meet your needs. I would recommend writing the html by hand instead of using the helper methods such as #html.raw since #html.raw is just a tool to generate html in the end anyways. You can write html manually accomplish what the helper methods do anyway and I think it will be easier for you in this situation. If you write the html correctly it should bind to the model correctly (which means it won't be empty on your post request model) So if you modify that html using javascript correctly, it will bind to your model correctly as well.
Take a look at some of these examples to get a better idea of what I am talking about:
http://www.hanselman.com/blog/ASPNETWireFormatForModelBindingToArraysListsCollectionsDictionaries.aspx
http://haacked.com/archive/2008/10/23/model-binding-to-a-list.aspx
http://blog.stevensanderson.com/2010/01/28/editing-a-variable-length-list-aspnet-mvc-2-style/
So to answer your question...
You could build a hidden container to hold your list values like this (make sure this container is inside the form):
<div id="ListValues" style="display:none">
</div>
Then put the results your ajax post into a javascript variable (not shown).
Then in javascript do something like this:
$('form').off('submit'); //i do this to prevent duplicate bindings depending on how this page may be rendered futuristically as a safety precaution.
$('form').on('submit', function (e) { //on submit, modify the form data to include the information you want inside of your ListNotes
var data = getAjaxResults(); //data represents your ajax results. You can acquire and format that how you'd like I will use the following as an example format for how you could save the results as JSON data: [{NoteID ="1",CompanyID ="2"}]
let listLength = data.length;
for (let i = 0; i < listLength; i++) {
$('#ListValues').append('<input type="text" name="ListNotes['+i+'].NoteID " value="' + data.NoteID +'" />')
$('#ListValues').append('<input type="text" name="ListNotes['+i+'].CompanyID " value="' + data.CompanyID +'" />')
//for your ajax results, do this for each field on the note object
}
})
That should do it! After you submit your form, it should automatically model bind to you ListNotes! You will be able to inpsect this in your debugger on your post controller action.
I try to do a dropdown list in my app. First of all I use a Meteor, so that's specific kind of app ofc :)
Second thing is that I use sebdah/meteor-autocompletion package, because I want my results to be sorted in specific way and limited.
The last thing I need is to group my results.
For example: If I have 2 products named "blah" I want to get only 1 "blag" in my dropdown "autocompletion" list.
Some code:
HTML:
<template name="InvoicesEditInsertInsertForm">
<input id="descriptionautocomplete" type="text" name="description" value="" class="form-control" autofocus="autofocus" placeholder="New Item...">
</template>
JS:
Template.InvoicesEditInsertInsertForm.rendered = function() {
AutoCompletion.init("input#descriptionautocomplete");
};
Template.InvoicesEditInsertInsertForm.events({
'keyup input#descriptionautocomplete': function () {
AutoCompletion.autocomplete({
element: 'input#descriptionautocomplete', // DOM identifier for the element
collection: InvoicesItem, // MeteorJS collection object
field: 'description', // Document field name to search for
limit: 5, // Max number of elements to show
sort: { modifiedAt: -1 },
}); // Sort object to filter results with
},
});
I need to use function that could group my "description" here.
I tried to do it in helper and I get it on my screen, but to be honest I don't know how to put that into my dropdown :(
try: function() {
var item= InvoicesItem.find({},{sort:{modifiedAt:-1}}).fetch();
var descriptions={};
_.each(item,function(row){
var description = row.description;
if(descriptions[description]==null)
descriptions[description]={description:description};
});
return _.values(descriptions);
},
I don't think you can do what you want with that package. If you have a look at the current limitations of the package documentation, you can see other potential solutions to your problem.
You can do addtional filtering as follows:
filter: { 'gender': 'female' }});
but I don't think this will allow you to demand only unique options.
The code you wrote above for try won't do anything. Autocomplete doesn't take a field called try.
I have a filter I need to use two times (two pages/controllers), filtering on an object category. I can get this to work using this in each controller:
$scope.$on('category', function (event, arg) {
$scope.catSort = arg;
});
$scope.filterCat = function (item) {
return !$scope.catSort ?
item : (item.category == $scope.catSort);
};
The html i am filtering on:
<li dnd-draggable="item" ng-repeat="item in items| filter: filterCat">
</li>
I set the $scope.catSort which is what to filter on in a list of buttons the user can click:
<button class="btn btn-default" ng-click="$emit('category', 'all')">Show All</button>
<button class="btn btn-default" ng-click="$emit('category', 'Common')">Common</button>
The problem is, i have another html page with a different subset of categories that I need to filter on. Instead of just copying and pasting the $scope.filterCat function to filter again, I want to create a separate filter to inject into each controller (Thats best practice right?).
So what i have started is this for a separate filter:
angular.module("category-filter", [])
.filter('filterCat', function () {
return function (category, item) {
return !category ?
product : (item.category == $scope.catSort);
}
});
You can see i'm trying to get that category option as well. How do i reach into the scope and get the category? Should i use a service and on one of the button clicks set the category to filter on?
I'm still learning filters and what want to make sure its reusable and following best practices
Pass an object to the filter expression: filter:{category: '...', compareTo: '...'} and check it inside the filter function.
I've an inherited project writed in django 1.4 and I've no time to update it to another version of django.
I'm introducing angularjs in that project being newbie with it.
So, I've a HTML filled with data from the database (very simplified code):
<div ng-app="myApp" ng-controller="commentController">
<input placeholder="say something!" type="text">
<button class="btn" ng-click="sendComment()" >
<li ng-repeat="comment in comments" id="aportacion{{comment.pk}}">
{{comment.username}} - {{comment.text}}
</li>
</div>
And angularjs app (simplified) to fill the table with comments:
var app = angular.module("myApp", []);
app.controller("commentController",function ($scope) {
$scope.comments = [];
// this is generated dinamically with django from db data on page generation;
$scope.comments[$scope.comments.length] = {"username":"inigod", "text":"this is sparta"};
$scope.comments[$scope.comments.length] = {"username":"another guy", "text":"this is NOT sparta"};
.......
};
});
This works great, it builds all the comments ok, nice.
Now I've a textbox to add new comment and want to send via ajax the new comment to db and with the response json add a new comment in the top of the comments in html.
I've tried modificating the angularjs code to this:
app.controller("commentController",function ($scope) {
$scope.comments = [];
// this is generated dinamically with django from db data on page generation;
$scope.comments[$scope.comments] = {"username":"inigod", "text":"this is sparta"};
$scope.comments[$scope.comments] = {"username":"another guy", "text":"this is NOT sparta"};
$scope.sendComment = function(){
Dajaxice.kolokvoweb.post_comment($scope.comment_callback, {'thread':'{{thread.pk}}',
'type': 0,
'text': $('#comment').val(),
});
}
$scope.comment_callback = function (data){
if (data.result){
data["image"]= "/img/comment-placeholder.png";
//data["$$hashKey"] = "003";
alert("adding element" +$scope.aportaciones.length);
$scope.comments.push(data);
alert("added element" +$scope.aportaciones.length);
}
}
So I run this and I get two alert, one saying "adding element n" and the next "added element n+1" so it appears to reach to $scope.comment_callback an push the data to the array but the DOM is not updated and I cannot see the inserted comment in the page.
I must be something wrong but cannot find what...
I've see the response from ajax and is the same kind of JSON but withouth the $$haskey key.
PD: received data from the ajax service is:
{"username":"inigo","texto":"ggggggggggggggggggggggg","date":"now","result":true,"pk":74,"foto":"/img/agora-placeholder.png"}
The one getted when loading page for that comment (and which is well shown in the page) is:
{"pk":"74","texto":"ggggggggggggggggggggggg","username":"inigo","date":"10/11/14","foto":"/img/agora-placeholder.png"}
You have to wrap the content of comment_callback in a $scope.$apply method to notify about $scope changes within async callbacks:
$scope.comment_callback = function (data){
if (data.result){
$scope.$apply(function() {
data["image"]= "/img/comment-placeholder.png";
$scope.comments.push(data);
});
}
}
I am a php developer that is new to angular and javascript in general but finding it really powerful and fast for creating interactive UIs
I want to create a form for a user to create an object called a program, a program has some basic info like title and description and it can have many weeks. I want their to be an 'add week' button that when pressed displays a group of form fields related to weeks, if pushed again it shows another group of form fields to fill in the second weeks information.
edit1: specifically, how I am adding the objects to scope.program with the addWeeks method.
secondly when I console.log the $scope.program it just looks very messy a lot of arrays within objects within objects. it just dosnt look like a clean array of data but maybe thats just because I am not used to javascript and or json? Each week is going to have up to 7 days obviously and each day can have numerous events so it just seems to me like it is going to be quite messy but maybe I should just have faith :p
finally how the addProgram method is creating the json object to be sent to the server
when the form is submitted it should post a json object that looks something like this
program {
title: 'name of programme',
desc: 'description of programme',
weeks: [
{
item1: 'foo',
item2: 'more foo'
},
{
item1: 'foo2',
item2: 'more foo 2'
}
]
]
}
here is a codepen of what I am doing right now but I am not sure it is the best or even an ok way to do it, particularly how I am appending the arrays/objects in teh addWeek method.
there are going to be many more layers to the form and the object it is posting(days, sessions, excersises etc) so I want to get the basics of doing this right before adding all of that.
html
<div ng-app="trainercompare">
<div ng-controller="programsController">
<input type="text" placeholder="Program Title" ng-model="program.title"></br>
<input type="text" placeholder="Program Focus" ng-model="program.focus"></br>
<input type="text" placeholder="Program Description" ng-model="program.desc"></br>
<button ng-click="addWeek()"> add week</button>
<div ng-repeat="week in program.weeks">
<input type="text" placeholder="Name the week" ng-model="week.name">
<input type="text" placeholder="Describe It" ng-model="week.desc">
{{ week.name }}</br>
{{ week.desc }}</br>
</div>
<button ng-click="addProgram()"> add program</button>
</div>
</div>
app.js
var myModule = angular.module("trainercompare", ['ui.bootstrap']);
function programsController($scope, $http) {
$scope.program = {
weeks: [{
}]
};
$scope.addWeek = function() {
$scope.program.weeks.push(
{
}
);
};
function isDefined(x) {
var undefined;
return x !== undefined;
}
$scope.addProgram = function() {
var program = {
title: $scope.program.title,
focus: $scope.program.focus,
desc: $scope.program.desc,
weeks: []
};
angular.forEach($scope.program.weeks, function(week, index){
var weekinfo = {
name: week.name,
desc: week.desc
};
program.weeks.push(weekinfo);
});
$http.post('/programs', program).success(function(data, status) {
if(isDefined(data.errors)) {
console.log(data.errors);
}
if(isDefined(data.success)) {
console.log(data.success);
}
});
};
}
Looks to me like you've got a good grasp on it. The addWeek code looks correct. The extra data you see when you console.log your model is some of Angular's internal stuff to track bindings. When you post that to your server it should be cleaned up by Angular.
Angular has a JSON function that removes all of the hash values and other 'angular' things from your JSON. That's why they start with a $ so it knows to remove them.
This happens automatically when you use $http, it's in the documentation here:
If the data property of the request configuration object contains an object, serialize it into JSON format.
Since Angular will clean up the hashes and things, you don't need to "rebuild" the model when you're posting it... just set data to $scope.program and remove 70% of the code in $scope.addProgram.
To learn more specifically how Angular cleans up the JSON, look at this answer: Quick Way to "Un-Angularize" a JS Object