I need to show numbers on thumbnails, in the slider on my product page.
Problem is, most sliders I've come across, do not have a numbered-thumbnail function. And the few that do, don't support other features I'm looking for.
So, is there a way to add sequential numbers to thumbnails, in a slider that doesn't natively support them?
I have attached the normal way sliders work for each page. They usually have some CSS class applied to them. If find that class you can usually make the effect that covers up the number disabled.
Usual HTML Setup for Sliders
If you are more specific with what slider you are using we can help further.
Related
I am aware of the fact that layout and function of a site should be strictly separated. Layout should be done with CSS and functions of the site, like expand mobile menu on click, should be done with JS.
Reference:1. & 2.
What I often see happening for responsive layouts is having column classes for the various media queries, where just the class name is different, however the width values are identical.
This then leads to HTML in the form of
<div class="container small-query-columns-4 medium-query-columns-6 large-query-columns-12><p>Responsive paragraph..</p></div>.
Would it be acceptable to instead of always defining the same width for columns for various media queries to just make a minimal CSS grid, where the column classes widths are defined once and then dynamically pass those per media query with Enquire?
I know this ruins the above given separation from layout (CSS) and function (JS), though it would mean much cleaner HTML, and this per each media query plus much less CSS as well. Enquire also only calls once per media query so the hit on the amount to download would also be much less with a minimal CSS file. Yes, of course, this means the site is JS depended.
That's not bad idea but I think that it is not good idea too. I had thought about something similar few weeks ago. I wanted to make CSS which will be compiled in browser via JS in few loops and then appended to head section. But after deep thinking I decided to not doing that.
I know that you can make fallbacks and some fancy stuff so it works in every browser with or without js, but I have looked at my grid. It takes less than 10KB. It's interesting idea, but it isn't worh so much work as it will take. Keep your HTML organised and you won't run into issue with too many css classes. You have to let someone who use your "framework" do define widths at certain breakpoints. Easiest thing to do is just write a class name.
Consider that when you use for example bootstrap and want to have 12 columns on mobile, you just don't define it and it automatically falls into that width. Many times it just enough to define max 2 breakpoints with css classes.
When I think about enquirejs I think that it can be used for hiding sliders on mobile for example. When you just display: none it still running and changing classes. If you have something similiar what should be removed because mobile is not good environment for running something, you can disable it by using enquire. Another example is mansory grid, which you can start and disable via enquirejs.
Basically you can use it if you have something already js-depended and want to customize it on diffrent screens, or give diffrent behavior, because if you just set something on window load or document load, you have an issue with someone who resizes window. Here you can use it.
I've been working on the Sequence slider from www.sequencejs.com. The slider is very intuitive but it can only do one kind of animation on an object, from what i've observed so far, here's how the slider works:
1.the html section consist of an unordered list which in turn have list-items
2.the js file edits the li's class to "animate-in" marking the rest of them "animate-out"
3.after 5s, the second li is marked "animate-in" and rest are marked "animate-out"
4.the css file uses the css3 transitions to animate classes when "animate-in" is triggered on that class
What i need?
I need to do multiple animations on one object. But not together, rather one after another, for instance, an image would slide in from the right; then scale up.
Maybe there's some way of doing it that i might not know, i would appreciate your help with that
Or, I was thinking if the javascript file could add more classes at certain times, I could get the effect. I went through the javascript but I'm not skilled enough to understand that yet.
Could you guys take a look at it and explain me which parts handle the class changing? How can I make it add more classes between "animate-in" and "animate-out"?
You can get the slider from here: sequencejs.com/slider-parallax/
Hope I was clear enough.
Basically, on a website I want to display a number of elements in the same space one after the other with a fade effect to transition between them; this would be used to display quotes from customers on a website. I've achieved this before using images and using CSS effects to fade in/out from the first to the last and it looked good, the only issue is the fact that obviously images have sizing issues when it comes to making the site responsive, and the images take up unnecessary space on the server and effect loading times, depending on how many are used. My question is simple to ask if anyone knows of a more efficient way of creating a similar effect that can use plain text instead of images? Possibly by hiding all text bar one line within an element and then fading to the next line? Preferably using only CSS but js answers are welcome too. Thanks in advance!
Also, a website using images for the effect I want to achieve: http://portsmouthtap.co.uk/
I have a grid of div boxes that I will be animating. They will be moving across the screen after a user drags one of the boxes (to re-align into a grid).
Currently I am using JQuery to change the css left and top positions of all of the divs and running this on an interval.
It is laggy if there are more than 50 boxes. How do I make this less laggy? Is there an animation library that is better for this, or do I just need to limit it to 50 boxes?
Image of layout:
You have a few options to optimize the performance.
Newer browsers have requestAnimationFrame that lets the browser take care of the animation timing in order to optimize Javascript animations. Rather than using times to perform the animation, which is what jQuery framework uses, you repeatedly a callback to requestAnimationFrame. The browser will call your function with a progress variable for the animation, and you render the current stage of your animation based on the progress variable. requestAnimationFrame for smarting animating talks about this in depth. Google Closure is the only framework I am aware of that uses requestAnimationFrame however, and it's rather heavyweight.
CSS animations. jQuery offers CSS animation, so do many other frameworks. CSS animations give you hardware acceleration, so the animation is much faster. Unfortunately, CSS animations are relatively new and not yet well supported, so you'll probably end up falling back to Javascript animation on older browsers, depending on the library you use.
Optimize your Javascript. Instead of animation each and every box in the grid, encapsulate each row in a div and animate the entire div instead. That should speed the animation up by a bit. I'm sure there are other ways you can optimize based on your current implementation.
Honestly, I don't know of any library that will make this work more efficiently for you, though there are many libraries out there that are faster than jQuery. The issue isn't just the jQuery, its the fact that you have 50 elements that are all moving/draggable, thus requiring a lot of the browser's resources.
If you can post your code there may be a few things that we could suggest to speed it up slightly.
The two biggest things problems that I can think of are if you added those boxes programmatically and added the handler for each as you added the element to the page, and if you don't store your selectors in variables. Aside from that I would have to see the code.
Have a look at:
jQuery isotope
It has options to allow you to use css3 animations if available or use jQuery / JS animations.
Handy for grid like animation and arrangements.
Some brave soul has managed to add drag and drop to isotope too. http://tyler-designs.com/masonry-ui/ (a bit clunky but works)
There are several ways of increasing the performance. One would be to reduce the amount of DOM elements required for each box. Another is to not animate (and render) boxes outside of the current viewport. Give all boxes that are outside of the viewable area "display: none;" and exclude them before starting a new animation. If you want to go even further you can start to recycle boxes instead of showing and hiding them when the user is scrolling through the page.
This way you will always get the same performance no matter how many boxes you have (above the amount that you can fit in the viewport).
This technique is called UI virtualization. There are several projects that use it like: http://github.com/mleibman/SlickGrid/wiki. It's really useful when you need to render a lot of elements (hundreds, thousands, millions). But it takes quite some work to get it right. And I don't know about any generic working components that are easy to plug in. I tried to find an article that explains it. This is the only thing I could come up with for now, it's for Silverlight though: http://www.silverlightshow.net/items/Virtualization-in-Silverlight-4-RC.aspx
Also try this this plugin for jQuery. Use the regular 'animate' method and it will try to use (hardware accelerated) CSS animations where possible: http://playground.benbarnett.net/jquery-animate-enhanced/
I just need to display the images in the very center of the page. The images will be different widths but should still be centered. I have custom arrow pointers and I want the other images to be hidden while the other fades out and a new one in.
I've found jquery cycle and stuff but I couldn't center the slideshow to the center of the page for some strange reason.
Any advice?
What plugins can I alter (just replace images) to get what I want?
http://www.proglogic.com/learn/javascript/lesson10.php
not sure if you are still looking for this, as its been awhile since your post - but this is a very simple slideshow using javascript and a table. the image is displayed with "previous" and "next" links below, which can of course be changed to whatever you want. the only possible issue is that it uses html tables which are frowned upon (unless completely necessary). it is however, very easily center-able using css. good luck!
Checkout Anything Slider. That seems to be what you are looking for.