We Keep Coding

Reversing certain number of elements in an array javascript

I am working on a code where I need to reverse certain no of elements in an array and rest should remain same. For example is an array has values of 1,2,3,4,5,6 and I have to reverse 4 elements of it then output should be 4,3,2,1,5,6. I am using below code to achieve this but getting error, please suggest.
function reverseArray(n, a) {
var interimArray1 = [];
//var interimArray2=[];
//var finalArray=[];
for (var i < n; i >= 0; i--) {
interimArray1.push[a[i]];
}
for (var i = n; i < a.length; i++) {
interimArray1.push[a[i]];
}
for (var i = 0; i < interimArray1.length; i++) {
console.log(interimArray1[i]);
}
}
var arr = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6];
var num = 4;
reverseArray(num, arr);

The error in your code is that you intend to call the push method on a[i] like so:
interimArray1.push(a[i]);
but instead you write:
interimArray1.push[a[i]];
You make that mistake twice. To give arguments to the push method, you must use round parenthesis ().
With that fixed, you will see that your code works perfectly.

You can use Array#slice, Array#splice as follow.
function partialReverse(arr, num, from = 0) {
var slicedArr = arr.slice(from, num + from);
arr.splice(from, num); // Remove `num` items from array
arr.splice(from, 0, ...slicedArr.reverse()); // Add `num` reversed items
return arr;
}
var arr = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6];
console.log(partialReverse(arr, 4, 0)); // Reverse four items from `arr` starting from 0th index
console.log(partialReverse(arr, 4, 1)); // Reverse four items from `arr` starting from 1st index

Lots of hints but you seem to be missing them. ;-)
You need to assign an initial value to i, so:
for (var i = n; ... )
===========^
Also, you need to use () to call functions, not [], so:
interimArray1.push(a[i]);
==================^====^
Same in the following for block. Otherwise, the code works though it's more verbose than it needs to be.

This is working :
I'm sure there are faster ways of doing it. Also, it will only work for elements at the beginning of the array but you can adjust the function for what you want to achieve.
var reverseArray = function(arr,elementsToReverse) {
var tempArrayRev = [];
var tempArray = [];
for (var i=0;i<arr.length;i++) {
if (i < elementsToReverse) {
tempArrayRev[i] = arr[i];
} else {
tempArray.push(arr[i]);
}
}
return tempArrayRev.reverse().concat(tempArray);
}
var array = [1,2,3,4,5,6];
document.getElementById('arrayOutput').innerHTML += reverseArray(array,4);
<div id="arrayOutput">Array :<br></div>

This is the answer you can test it.
function reverseArray(n, a) {
var interimArray1 = [];
for (var i = 0; i < a.length; i++) {
interimArray1.push(a[i]);
}
for (var i = num; i >=0; i--) {
interimArray1[i-1] = a[n - i];
}
for (var i = 0; i < interimArray1.length; i++) {
console.log(interimArray1[i]);
}
}
var arr = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6];
var num = 4;
reverseArray(num, arr);

You could use something like this.
function reverseArray(n, arrIn) {
// Splice splits the array in 2 starting at 0 index going n long
var arrOut = arrIn.splice(0,n);
// reverse is pretty straight forward
arrOut = arrOut.reverse();
// Concat joins the two together
return arrOut.concat(arrIn);
}

Check if an array contains duplicate values [duplicate]

This question already has answers here:
In Javascript, how do I check if an array has duplicate values?
(9 answers)
Closed 10 months ago.
I wanted to write a javascript function which checks if array contains duplicate values or not.
I have written the following code but its giving answer as "true" always.
Can anybody please tell me what am I missing.
function checkIfArrayIsUnique(myArray)
{
for (var i = 0; i < myArray.length; i++)
{
for (var j = 0; j < myArray.length; j++)
{
if (i != j)
{
if (myArray[i] == myArray[j])
{
return true; // means there are duplicate values
}
}
}
}
return false; // means there are no duplicate values.
}

An easy solution, if you've got ES6, uses Set:
function checkIfArrayIsUnique(myArray) {
return myArray.length === new Set(myArray).size;
}
let uniqueArray = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5];
console.log(`${uniqueArray} is unique : ${checkIfArrayIsUnique(uniqueArray)}`);
let nonUniqueArray = [1, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5];
console.log(`${nonUniqueArray} is unique : ${checkIfArrayIsUnique(nonUniqueArray)}`);

let arr = [11,22,11,22];
let hasDuplicate = arr.some((val, i) => arr.indexOf(val) !== i);
// hasDuplicate = true
True -> array has duplicates
False -> uniqe array

This should work with only one loop:
function checkIfArrayIsUnique(arr) {
var map = {}, i, size;
for (i = 0, size = arr.length; i < size; i++){
if (map[arr[i]]){
return false;
}
map[arr[i]] = true;
}
return true;
}

You got the return values the wrong way round:
As soon as you find two values that are equal, you can conclude that the array is not unique and return false.
At the very end, after you've checked all the pairs, you can return true.
If you do this a lot, and the arrays are large, you might want to investigate the possibility of sorting the array and then only comparing adjacent elements. This will have better asymptotic complexity than your current method.

Assuming you're targeting browsers that aren't IE8,
this would work as well:
function checkIfArrayIsUnique(myArray)
{
for (var i = 0; i < myArray.length; i++)
{
if (myArray.indexOf(myArray[i]) !== myArray.lastIndexOf(myArray[i])) {
return false;
}
}
return true; // this means not unique
}

Here's an O(n) solution:
function hasDupes(arr) {
/* temporary object */
var uniqOb = {};
/* create object attribute with name=value in array, this will not keep dupes*/
for (var i in arr)
uniqOb[arr[i]] = "";
/* if object's attributes match array, then no dupes! */
if (arr.length == Object.keys(uniqOb).length)
alert('NO dupes');
else
alert('HAS dupes');
}
var arr = ["1/1/2016", "1/1/2016", "2/1/2016"];
hasDupes(arr);
https://jsfiddle.net/7kkgy1j3/

Another solution:
Array.prototype.checkIfArrayIsUnique = function() {
this.sort();
for ( var i = 1; i < this.length; i++ ){
if(this[i-1] == this[i])
return false;
}
return true;
}

function hasNoDuplicates(arr) {
return arr.every(num => arr.indexOf(num) === arr.lastIndexOf(num));
}
hasNoDuplicates accepts an array and returns true if there are no duplicate values. If there are any duplicates, the function returns false.

Without a for loop, only using Map().
You can also return the duplicates.
(function(a){
let map = new Map();
a.forEach(e => {
if(map.has(e)) {
let count = map.get(e);
console.log(count)
map.set(e, count + 1);
} else {
map.set(e, 1);
}
});
let hasDup = false;
let dups = [];
map.forEach((value, key) => {
if(value > 1) {
hasDup = true;
dups.push(key);
}
});
console.log(dups);
return hasDup;
})([2,4,6,2,1,4]);

Late answer but can be helpful
function areThereDuplicates(args) {
let count = {};
for(let i = 0; i < args.length; i++){
count[args[i]] = 1 + (count[args[i]] || 0);
}
let found = Object.keys(count).filter(function(key) {
return count[key] > 1;
});
return found.length ? true : false;
}
areThereDuplicates([1,2,5]);

The code given in the question can be better written as follows
function checkIfArrayIsUnique(myArray)
{
for (var i = 0; i < myArray.length; i++)
{
for (var j = i+1; j < myArray.length; j++)
{
if (myArray[i] == myArray[j])
{
return true; // means there are duplicate values
}
}
}
return false; // means there are no duplicate values.
}

Returns the duplicate item in array and creates a new array with no duplicates:
var a = ["hello", "hi", "hi", "juice", "juice", "test"];
var b = ["ding", "dong", "hi", "juice", "juice", "test"];
var c = a.concat(b);
var dupClearArr = [];
function dupArray(arr) {
for (i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) {
if (arr.indexOf(arr[i]) != i && arr.indexOf(arr[i]) != -1) {
console.log('duplicate item ' + arr[i]);
} else {
dupClearArr.push(arr[i])
}
}
console.log('actual array \n' + arr + ' \nno duplicate items array \n' + dupClearArr)
}
dupArray(c);

const containsMatches = (a1, a2) => a1.some((v) => a2.includes(v));

If your array nests other arrays/objects, using the Set approach may not be what you want since comparing two objects compares their references. If you want to check that their contained values are equal, something else is needed. Here are a couple different approaches.
Approach 1: Map using JSON.stringify for keys
If you want to consider objects with the same contained values as equal, here's one simple way to do it using a Map object. It uses JSON.stringify to make a unique id for each element in the array.
I believe the runtime of this would be O(n * m) on arrays, assuming JSON.stringify serializes in linear time. n is the length of the outer array, m is size of the arrays. If the objects get very large, however, this may slow down since the keys will be very long. Not a very space-efficient implementation, but it is simple and works for many data types.
function checkArrayDupeFree(myArray, idFunc) {
const dupeMap = new Map();
for (const el of myArray) {
const id = idFunc(el);
if (dupeMap.has(id))
return false;
dupeMap.set(id, el);
}
return true;
}
const notUnique = [ [1, 2], [1, 3], [1, 2] ];
console.log(`${JSON.stringify(notUnique)} has no duplicates? ${checkArrayDupeFree(notUnique, JSON.stringify)}`);
const unique = [ [2, 1], [1, 3], [1, 2] ];
console.log(`${JSON.stringify(unique)} has no duplicates? ${checkArrayDupeFree(unique, JSON.stringify)}`);
Of course, you could also write your own id-generator function, though I'm not sure you can do much better than JSON.stringify.
Approach 2: Custom HashMap, Hashcode, and Equality implementations
If you have a lot of big arrays, it may be better performance-wise to implement your own hash/equality functions and use a Map as a HashMap.
In the following implementation, we hash the array. If there is a collision, map a key to an array of collided values, and check to see if any of the array values match according to the equality function.
The downside of this approach is that you may have to consider a wide range of types for which to make hashcode/equality functions, depending on what's in the array.
function checkArrayDupeFreeWHashes(myArray, hashFunc, eqFunc) {
const hashMap = new Map();
for (const el of myArray) {
const hash = hashFunc(el);
const hit = hashMap.get(hash);
if (hit == null)
hashMap.set(hash, [el]);
else if (hit.some(v => eqFunc(v, el)))
return false;
else
hit.push(el);
}
return true;
}
Here's a demo of the custom HashMap in action. I implemented a hashing function and an equality function for arrays of arrays.
function checkArrayDupeFreeWHashes(myArray, hashFunc, eqFunc) {
const hashMap = new Map();
for (const el of myArray) {
const hash = hashFunc(el);
const hit = hashMap.get(hash);
if (hit == null)
hashMap.set(hash, [el]);
else if (hit.some(v => eqFunc(v, el)))
return false;
else
hit.push(el);
}
return true;
}
function arrayHasher(arr) {
let hash = 19;
for (let i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) {
const el = arr[i];
const toHash = Array.isArray(el)
? arrayHasher(el)
: el * 23;
hash = hash * 31 + toHash;
}
return hash;
}
function arrayEq(a, b) {
if (a.length != b.length)
return false;
for (let i = 0; i < a.length; i++) {
if ((Array.isArray(a) || Array.isArray(b)) && !arrayEq(a[i], b[i]))
return false;
else if (a[i] !== b[i])
return false;
}
return true;
}
const notUnique = [ [1, 2], [1, 3], [1, 2] ];
const unique = [ [2, 1], [1, 3], [1, 2] ];
console.log(`${JSON.stringify(notUnique)} has no duplicates? ${checkArrayDupeFreeWHashes(notUnique, arrayHasher, arrayEq)}`);
console.log(`${JSON.stringify(unique)} has no duplicates? ${checkArrayDupeFreeWHashes(unique, arrayHasher, arrayEq)}`);

function checkIfArrayIsUnique(myArray)
{
isUnique=true
for (var i = 0; i < myArray.length; i++)
{
for (var j = 0; j < myArray.length; j++)
{
if (i != j)
{
if (myArray[i] == myArray[j])
{
isUnique=false
}
}
}
}
return isUnique;
}
This assume that the array is unique at the start.
If find two equals values, then change to false

i think this is the simple way
$(document).ready(function() {
var arr = [1,2,3,9,6,5,6];
console.log( "result =>"+ if_duplicate_value (arr));
});
function if_duplicate_value (arr){
for(i=0;i<arr.length-1;i++){
for(j=i+1;j<arr.length;j++){
if(arr[i]==arr[j]){
return true;
}
}
}
return false;
}
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.3.1/jquery.min.js"></script>

var c=[2,2,3,3,5,5,4,4,8,8];
for(var i=0; i<b.length; i++){
for(var j=i+1; j<b.length; j++){
if(c[i]==c[j]){
console.log(c[j]);
}
}
}

Finding index of a value in an array

I've been looking around the website and all I find are questions regarding finding the index of a value in an array, but that value is the only occurrence of that value in the array. I was wondering is there was a way to find the index of a repeated value every time that it occurs.
Say there's and array like so:
var arr = [45,56,76,4,53,43,6,273,884,69,47,58,225,222,23,13,89,900,7,66,78,74,69];
Is it possible to loop through this and find the indexes of the value 69?

Here's a way to do it in modern browsers:
function findIndexes(arr, val){
return arr.map(function(v,i){ return v==val && i }).filter(Number);
}
console.log(findIndexes(arr, 69)); //=> [9,22]

Of course it's possible. Computers are amazing.
var positions = [];
for (var i = 0; i < arr.length; ++i)
if (arr[i] === 69)
positions.push(i);
At the end of that loop, the array "positions" will contain all the indexes of the array where 69 was found.
You could generalize this:
function indexes(arr, value) {
var rv = [];
for (var i = 0; i < arr.length; ++i)
if (arr[i] === value)
rv.push(i);
return rv;
}
and then:
var i69 = indexes(arr, 69);

Since we're all posting various ways to perform simple tasks...
var arr = [45,56,76,4,53,43,6,273,884,69,47,58,225,222,23,13,89,900,7,66,78,74,69];
arr.reduce(function(res, n, i) {
return n === 69 ? res.concat(i) : res;
}, []);

Loop while the next indexOf is not -1..
function allIndicesOf(arr, val) {
var found = [], i = -1;
while (-1 !== (i = arr.indexOf(val, i + 1))) found.push(i);
return found;
}
var arr = [0, 1, 2, 3, 2, 1, 8, 5, 2, 0, 4, 3, 3, 1];
allIndicesOf(arr, 3); // [3, 11, 12]

My idea
function indexs(arr,val){
var start = arr.indexOf(val),result = [];
while(start >= 0){
result.push(start);
start = arr.indexOf(val,start+1);
}
return result;
}
Have fun :)

var arr = [45,56,76,4,53,43,6,273,884,69,47,58,225,222,23,13,89,900,7,66,78,74,69],
i = arr.length,
o = {};
while( i-- ) {
if( !o[ arr[i] ] ) {
`o[ arr[i] ] = [];`
}
o[ arr[i] ].push( i );
}
alert( o[69] );

JavaScript - Generating combinations from n arrays with m elements [duplicate]

This question already has answers here:
Cartesian product of multiple arrays in JavaScript
(35 answers)
Closed 1 year ago.
I'm having trouble coming up with code to generate combinations from n number of arrays with m number of elements in them, in JavaScript. I've seen similar questions about this for other languages, but the answers incorporate syntactic or library magic that I'm unsure how to translate.
Consider this data:
[[0,1], [0,1,2,3], [0,1,2]]
3 arrays, with a different number of elements in them. What I want to do is get all combinations by combining an item from each array.
For example:
0,0,0 // item 0 from array 0, item 0 from array 1, item 0 from array 2
0,0,1
0,0,2
0,1,0
0,1,1
0,1,2
0,2,0
0,2,1
0,2,2
And so on.
If the number of arrays were fixed, it would be easy to make a hard coded implementation. But the number of arrays may vary:
[[0,1], [0,1]]
[[0,1,3,4], [0,1], [0], [0,1]]
Any help would be much appreciated.

Here is a quite simple and short one using a recursive helper function:
function cartesian(...args) {
var r = [], max = args.length-1;
function helper(arr, i) {
for (var j=0, l=args[i].length; j<l; j++) {
var a = arr.slice(0); // clone arr
a.push(args[i][j]);
if (i==max)
r.push(a);
else
helper(a, i+1);
}
}
helper([], 0);
return r;
}
Usage:
cartesian([0,1], [0,1,2,3], [0,1,2]);
To make the function take an array of arrays, just change the signature to function cartesian(args) instead of using rest parameter syntax.

I suggest a simple recursive generator function:
// JS
function* cartesianIterator(head, ...tail) {
const remainder = tail.length ? cartesianIterator(...tail) : [[]];
for (let r of remainder) for (let h of head) yield [h, ...r];
}
// get values:
const cartesian = items => [...cartesianIterator(items)];
console.log(cartesian(input));
// TS
function* cartesianIterator<T>(items: T[][]): Generator<T[]> {
const remainder = items.length > 1 ? cartesianIterator(items.slice(1)) : [[]];
for (let r of remainder) for (let h of items.at(0)!) yield [h, ...r];
}
// get values:
const cartesian = <T>(items: T[][]) => [...cartesianIterator(items)];
console.log(cartesian(input));

You could take an iterative approach by building sub arrays.
var parts = [[0, 1], [0, 1, 2, 3], [0, 1, 2]],
result = parts.reduce((a, b) => a.reduce((r, v) => r.concat(b.map(w => [].concat(v, w))), []));
console.log(result.map(a => a.join(', ')));
.as-console-wrapper { max-height: 100% !important; top: 0; }

After doing a little research I discovered a previous related question:
Finding All Combinations of JavaScript array values
I've adapted some of the code from there so that it returns an array of arrays containing all of the permutations:
function(arraysToCombine) {
var divisors = [];
for (var i = arraysToCombine.length - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
divisors[i] = divisors[i + 1] ? divisors[i + 1] * arraysToCombine[i + 1].length : 1;
}
function getPermutation(n, arraysToCombine) {
var result = [],
curArray;
for (var i = 0; i < arraysToCombine.length; i++) {
curArray = arraysToCombine[i];
result.push(curArray[Math.floor(n / divisors[i]) % curArray.length]);
}
return result;
}
var numPerms = arraysToCombine[0].length;
for(var i = 1; i < arraysToCombine.length; i++) {
numPerms *= arraysToCombine[i].length;
}
var combinations = [];
for(var i = 0; i < numPerms; i++) {
combinations.push(getPermutation(i, arraysToCombine));
}
return combinations;
}
I've put a working copy at http://jsfiddle.net/7EakX/ that takes the array you gave earlier ([[0,1], [0,1,2,3], [0,1,2]]) and outputs the result to the browser console.

const charSet = [["A", "B"],["C", "D", "E"],["F", "G", "H", "I"]];
console.log(charSet.reduce((a,b)=>a.flatMap(x=>b.map(y=>x+y)),['']))

Just for fun, here's a more functional variant of the solution in my first answer:
function cartesian() {
var r = [], args = Array.from(arguments);
args.reduceRight(function(cont, factor, i) {
return function(arr) {
for (var j=0, l=factor.length; j<l; j++) {
var a = arr.slice(); // clone arr
a[i] = factor[j];
cont(a);
}
};
}, Array.prototype.push.bind(r))(new Array(args.length));
return r;
}
Alternative, for full speed we can dynamically compile our own loops:
function cartesian() {
return (cartesian.cache[arguments.length] || cartesian.compile(arguments.length)).apply(null, arguments);
}
cartesian.cache = [];
cartesian.compile = function compile(n) {
var args = [],
indent = "",
up = "",
down = "";
for (var i=0; i<n; i++) {
var arr = "$"+String.fromCharCode(97+i),
ind = String.fromCharCode(105+i);
args.push(arr);
up += indent+"for (var "+ind+"=0, l"+arr+"="+arr+".length; "+ind+"<l"+arr+"; "+ind+"++) {\n";
down = indent+"}\n"+down;
indent += " ";
up += indent+"arr["+i+"] = "+arr+"["+ind+"];\n";
}
var body = "var res=[],\n arr=[];\n"+up+indent+"res.push(arr.slice());\n"+down+"return res;";
return cartesian.cache[n] = new Function(args, body);
}

var f = function(arr){
if(typeof arr !== 'object'){
return false;
}
arr = arr.filter(function(elem){ return (elem !== null); }); // remove empty elements - make sure length is correct
var len = arr.length;
var nextPerm = function(){ // increase the counter(s)
var i = 0;
while(i < len)
{
arr[i].counter++;
if(arr[i].counter >= arr[i].length){
arr[i].counter = 0;
i++;
}else{
return false;
}
}
return true;
};
var getPerm = function(){ // get the current permutation
var perm_arr = [];
for(var i = 0; i < len; i++)
{
perm_arr.push(arr[i][arr[i].counter]);
}
return perm_arr;
};
var new_arr = [];
for(var i = 0; i < len; i++) // set up a counter property inside the arrays
{
arr[i].counter = 0;
}
while(true)
{
new_arr.push(getPerm()); // add current permutation to the new array
if(nextPerm() === true){ // get next permutation, if returns true, we got them all
break;
}
}
return new_arr;
};

Here's another way of doing it. I treat the indices of all of the arrays like a number whose digits are all different bases (like time and dates), using the length of the array as the radix.
So, using your first set of data, the first digit is base 2, the second is base 4, and the third is base 3. The counter starts 000, then goes 001, 002, then 010. The digits correspond to indices in the arrays, and since order is preserved, this is no problem.
I have a fiddle with it working here: http://jsfiddle.net/Rykus0/DS9Ea/1/
and here is the code:
// Arbitrary base x number class
var BaseX = function(initRadix){
this.radix = initRadix ? initRadix : 1;
this.value = 0;
this.increment = function(){
return( (this.value = (this.value + 1) % this.radix) === 0);
}
}
function combinations(input){
var output = [], // Array containing the resulting combinations
counters = [], // Array of counters corresponding to our input arrays
remainder = false, // Did adding one cause the previous digit to rollover?
temp; // Holds one combination to be pushed into the output array
// Initialize the counters
for( var i = input.length-1; i >= 0; i-- ){
counters.unshift(new BaseX(input[i].length));
}
// Get all possible combinations
// Loop through until the first counter rolls over
while( !remainder ){
temp = []; // Reset the temporary value collection array
remainder = true; // Always increment the last array counter
// Process each of the arrays
for( i = input.length-1; i >= 0; i-- ){
temp.unshift(input[i][counters[i].value]); // Add this array's value to the result
// If the counter to the right rolled over, increment this one.
if( remainder ){
remainder = counters[i].increment();
}
}
output.push(temp); // Collect the results.
}
return output;
}
// Input is an array of arrays
console.log(combinations([[0,1], [0,1,2,3], [0,1,2]]));

You can use a recursive function to get all combinations
const charSet = [["A", "B"],["C", "D", "E"],["F", "G", "H", "I"]];
let loopOver = (arr, str = '', final = []) => {
if (arr.length > 1) {
arr[0].forEach(v => loopOver(arr.slice(1), str + v, final))
} else {
arr[0].forEach(v => final.push(str + v))
}
return final
}
console.log(loopOver(charSet))
This code can still be shorten using ternary but i prefer the first version for readability 😊
const charSet = [["A", "B"],["C", "D", "E"],["F", "G", "H", "I"]];
let loopOver = (arr, str = '') => arr[0].map(v => arr.length > 1 ? loopOver(arr.slice(1), str + v) : str + v).flat()
console.log(loopOver(charSet))

Another implementation with ES6 recursive style
Array.prototype.cartesian = function(a,...as){
return a ? this.reduce((p,c) => (p.push(...a.cartesian(...as).map(e => as.length ? [c,...e] : [c,e])),p),[])
: this;
};
console.log(JSON.stringify([0,1].cartesian([0,1,2,3], [[0],[1],[2]])));

Alternate method to splice function in JavaScript

Hi i am working on LIME programming which is a subset of javascript.
i need to use javascript.splice to remove certain elements from my array, sad to say, LIME does not support splice function.
Any idea how do i create my own function to remove elements from an array?
Thanks for your time.
EDIT: Manage to create a simple function.
function removeElements(array, index)
{
var tempArray = new Array();
var counter = 0;
for(var i = 0; i < array.length; i++)
{
if(i != index)
{
tempArray[counter] = array[i];
counter++;
}
}
return tempArray;
}

Array.prototype.splice is fully defined in ECMA-262 §15.4.4.12, so use that as your spec and write one. e.g.
15.4.4.12 Array.prototype.splice (start, deleteCount [ , item1 [ ,item2 [ , … ] ] ] )
When the splice
method is called with two or more
arguments start, deleteCount and
(optionally) item1, item2, etc., the
deleteCount elements of the array
starting at array index start are
replaced by the arguments item1,
item2, etc. An Array object containing
the deleted elements (if any) is
returned. The following steps are
taken:...
You will probably have to create a new array, copy the members up to start from the old array, insert the new members, then copy from start + deleteCount to the end to the new array.
Edit
Here is an amended splice, the first I posted was incorrect. This one splices the array passed in and returns the removed members. It looks a bit long but I tried to keep it close to the spec and not assume support for any complex Array methods or even Math.max/min. It can be simplified quite a bit if they are.
If push isn't supported, it can be replaced fairly simply too.
function arraySplice(array, start, deleteCount) {
var result = [];
var removed = [];
var argsLen = arguments.length;
var arrLen = array.length;
var i, k;
// Follow spec more or less
start = parseInt(start, 10);
deleteCount = parseInt(deleteCount, 10);
// Deal with negative start per spec
// Don't assume support for Math.min/max
if (start < 0) {
start = arrLen + start;
start = (start > 0)? start : 0;
} else {
start = (start < arrLen)? start : arrLen;
}
// Deal with deleteCount per spec
if (deleteCount < 0) deleteCount = 0;
if (deleteCount > (arrLen - start)) {
deleteCount = arrLen - start;
}
// Copy members up to start
for (i = 0; i < start; i++) {
result[i] = array[i];
}
// Add new elements supplied as args
for (i = 3; i < argsLen; i++) {
result.push(arguments[i]);
}
// Copy removed items to removed array
for (i = start; i < start + deleteCount; i++) {
removed.push(array[i]);
}
// Add those after start + deleteCount
for (i = start + (deleteCount || 0); i < arrLen; i++) {
result.push(array[i]);
}
// Update original array
array.length = 0;
i = result.length;
while (i--) {
array[i] = result[i];
}
// Return array of removed elements
return removed;
}

If you don't care about order of the array and you're just looking for a function to perform splice, here's an example.
/**
* Time Complexity: O(count) aka: O(1)
*/
function mySplice(array, start, count) {
if (typeof count == 'undefined') count = 1
while (count--) {
var index2remove = start + count
array[index2remove] = array.pop()
}
return array
}
If you want to return the removed elements like the normal splice method does this will work:
/**
* Time Complexity: O(count) aka: O(1)
*/
function mySplice(array, index, count) {
if (typeof count == 'undefined') count = 1
var removed = []
while (count--) {
var index2remove = index + count
removed.push(array[index2remove])
array[index2remove] = array.pop()
}
// for (var i = index; i < index + count; i++) {
// removed.push(array[i])
// array[i] = array.pop()
// }
return removed
}

This modifies the original Array, and returns the items that were removed, just like the original.
Array.prototype.newSplice = function( start, toRemove, insert ) {
var remove = this.slice( start, start + toRemove );
var temp = this.slice(0,start).concat( insert, this.slice( start + toRemove ) );
this.length = 0;
this.push.apply( this, temp );
return remove;
};
Comparison test: http://jsfiddle.net/wxGDd/
var arr = [0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8];
var arr2 = [0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8];
console.log( arr.splice( 3, 2, 6 ) ); // [3, 4]
console.log( arr ); // [0, 1, 2, 6, 5, 6, 7, 8]
console.log( arr2.newSplice( 3, 2, 6 ) ); // [3, 4]
console.log( arr2 ); // [0, 1, 2, 6, 5, 6, 7, 8]
It could use a little extra detail work, but for the most part it takes care of it.

Here is a simple implement in case the Array.prototype.splice dispears
if (typeof Array.prototype.splice === 'undefined') {
Array.prototype.splice = function (index, howmany, elemes) {
howmany = typeof howmany === 'undefined' || this.length;
var elems = Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments, 2), newArr = this.slice(0, index), last = this.slice(index + howmany);
newArr = newArr.concat.apply(newArr, elems);
newArr = newArr.concat.apply(newArr, last);
return newArr;
}
}

Are there any other methods that are missing in LIME's Array implementation?
Assuming at least the most basic push() and indexOf() is available, there's several ways you could do it. How this is done would depend on whether this is destructive method or whether it should return a new array. Assuming the same input as the standard splice(index, howMany, element1, elementN) method:
Create a new array named new
push() indexes 0 to index onto the new array
Now stop at index and push() any new elements passed in. If LIME supports the standard arguments variable then you can loop through arguments with index > 2. Otherwise you'll need to pass in an array instead of a variable number of parameters.
After inserting the new objects, continue looping through the input array's elements, starting at index + howMany and going until input.length
I believe that should get you the results you're looking for.

I have used this below function as an alternative for splice()
array = mySplice(array,index,count);
above is the function call,
And this is my function mySplice()
function mySplice(array, index, count)
{
var newArray = [];
if( count > 0 )
{ count--;}
else
{ count++;}
for(i = 0; i <array.length; i++)
{
if(!((i <= index + count && i >= index) || (i <= index && i >= index + count)))
{
newArray.push(array[i])
}
}
return newArray;
}

I have done it very similar way using only one for loop
function removeElements(a,index,n){
// a=> Array , index=> index value from array to delete
// n=> number of elements you want to delete
let temp = []; // for storing deleted elements
let main_array = []; // for remaining elements which are not deleted
let k = 0;
for(let i=0;i<a.length;i++){
if((i===index) || ((index<i && i<n+index))){
temp[i]=a[i+1];
delete a[i];
}
if(a[i]!==undefined){
main_array[k] = a[i];
a[i] = main_array[k];
k++;
}
}
a=main_array;
return a;
}
a=[1,2,3,4,5];
console.log(removeElements(a,0,1));
follow link Jsfiddle

var a = [3, 2, 5, 6, 7];
var fromindex = 1
var toindex = 2;
for (var i = 0; i < a.length; i++) {
if (i >= fromindex + toindex || i < fromindex) {
console.log(a[i])
}
}

var a = [3, 2, 5, 6, 7];
var temp=[];
function splice(fromindex,toindex)
{
for (var i = 0; i < a.length; i++) {
if(i>=fromindex+toindex || i<fromindex)
{
temp.push(a[i])
}
}
return temp
}
console.log(splice(3,2))