I have not seen anything that specifically answers this question.
I intend to develop a text-based game that involves an action occurring every time an idle bar fills up(every x seconds passes)
I'm just trying to figure out the very basic layout of my javascript that will make the battling system in this game.
I'm trying to make the computer re-calculate pDamThisRound if pDamThisRound is not > baseD which is this case is 10.
If it is greater than baseD my code works and prints pDamThisRound. But if it isn't the code just prints nothing.
var baseD = 10;
var pStr = 25;
var pDam = Math.floor((baseD + pStr) / 2);
var pDamThisRound;
var pDamTR = function() {
pDamThisRound = (Math.floor(Math.random() * 2 * pDam));
};
pDamTR();
if(pDamThisRound > baseD) {
document.getElementById("h").innerHTML = pDamThisRound;
}
else {
pDamTR();
}
https://jsfiddle.net/qfnvf1y8/4/
the code just prints nothing
That's because there isn't any code which prints anything. Look at your else block:
else {
pDamTR();
}
What does that function do?:
var pDamTR = function() {
pDamThisRound = (Math.floor(Math.random() * 2 * pDam));
};
Nowhere do you produce any output.
Basically, if you want to print something then, well, print something. Just like you already do in your if block. For example:
document.getElementById("h").innerHTML = "something";
The function pDamTR is probably executing, the problem is that its assigning something to a variable, but doing nothing with it.
Here you go, a corrected version with a while operator:
https://jsfiddle.net/qfnvf1y8/6/
var baseD = 10;
var pStr = 25;
var pDam = Math.floor((baseD + pStr) / 2);
var pDamThisRound;
var pDamTR = function() {
pDamThisRound = (Math.floor(Math.random() * 2 * pDam));
};
pDamTR();
while(pDamThisRound <= baseD) {
pDamTR();
}
if(pDamThisRound > baseD) {
document.getElementById("h").innerHTML = pDamThisRound;
}
else {
pDamTR();
}
Regards,
Eugene
Several mistakes:
1) your else branch does not print anything
2) if you want pDamThisRound > baseD you need a while loop
while(pDamThisRound <= baseD) {
pDamTR();
}
printpDamTR();
function printpDamTR(){
document.getElementById("h").innerHTML = pDamThisRound;
}
The function printpDamTR would not be necessary, but it generally is a good idea to encapsulate such things, as you are probably going to use it more often. Also it increases the maintainability of your code since you loosen the dependencies between your JS and your HTML.
You can use setTimeout to help you, with something like this:
var baseD = 10;
var pStr = 25;
var pDam = Math.floor((baseD + pStr) / 2);
var timeoutDuration = 3000; // 3 seconds
window.setTimeout(function () {
// execute the check and the update logic here
var pDamThisRound = (Math.floor(Math.random() * 2 * pDam));
if(pDamThisRound > baseD) {
document.getElementById("h").innerHTML = pDamThisRound;
}
}, timeoutDuration);
This will execute the check every 3 seconds
Related
I am very new to JavaScript and I'm sure this question has been answered quite a bit, but when I search my question I don't seem to find an answer (or one that I actually understand :D)
Currently, I'm trying to create a tool to help kids with there multiplication facts and I'm having trouble getting the program to generate new random numbers.
var r1 = Math.floor(Math.random() * 13);
var r2 = Math.floor(Math.random() * 13);
function start() {
println("Welcome to the multipilcation helper! ");
var num = readLine("Pick a number you want to practice or type 'random'!");
var ques = readLine("How many questions do you want?");
if (num == "random") {
for (var i = 0; i < ques; i++) {
var answer = r1 * r2;
println(r1 + "*" + r2);
var check = readLine("what is the answer");
if (check == answer) {
println("thats correct!");
} else {
println("thats wrong! ");
}
}
}
}
The problem is that my variables seem to pick a random number as soon as the script starts and stick with it instead of giving me a new random number.
Can anyone help me out and tell me how to get a new random number every time the variable is called?
Simply create yourself a method like the one below and use it like r() to get a new random number every call.
function r() {
return Math.floor(Math.random() * 13);
}
console.log(r());
console.log(r());
console.log(r());
In your loop you should be reassigning the random numbers so that they are reassigned every iteration of the loop. Otherwise they stay static to the value you give them at the top.
Also, you should use triple equals in Javascript when checking for equality as it is best practice.
function start() {
console.log("Welcome to the multipilcation helper! ");
var num = prompt("Pick a number you want to practice or type 'random'!");
var ques = prompt("How many questions do you want?");
if (num == "random") {
for (var i = 0; i < ques; i++) {
var r1 = Math.floor(Math.random() * 13);
var r2 = Math.floor(Math.random() * 13);
var answer = r1 * r2;
console.log(r1 + "*" + r2);
var check = prompt("what is the answer");
if (check == answer) {
console.log("thats correct!");
} else {
console.log("thats wrong! ");
}
}
}
}
start()
You random numbers are being static at the moment. They need to be called again. Move your r1 and r2 assignments inside the for.
I don't have enough reputation to comment, but will update the answer
if you explain it with more details.
You need to put the random call in a function in order for it to create a new number each time. When you assign it directly to a variable as you have, it only runs once and stores that value in the variable.
// pick a number between 0 and 13
var random = function() {
return Math.floor(Math.random() * 13);
}
function start(){
for(var i = 0; i < 15; i++){
// call random function for each number and store in a var
var number1 = random();
var number2 = random();
var answer = number1 * number2;
console.log('equation:', number1 + '*' + number2);
console.log('answer:', answer);
}
}
// call the start function
start()
okay so i want if my counter reaches the maximum count, it starts over, with the default counter number which is 0 here is my code:
var picCount = 0; // global
var maxCount = 4;
//Pictures, to add more then 4 pics, add var picFive = "link to image here", var picSix ="bla", you get it.. add in picArray ,picFive and ,picSix
//To change the time delay, change it at the body onload and on the setTimeout
var picOne = "http://screenshots.nl.sftcdn.net/nl/scrn/3342000/3342167/modloader-for-minecraft-02-700x406.jpg"
var picTwo = "http://media.moddb.com/images/downloads/1/31/30912/minecraft_blox.png"
var picThree = "http://www.mupload.nl/img/rl6zeofbb.png"
var picFour = "http://www.mupload.nl/img/rl6zeofbb.png"
var picArray = [picOne, picTwo, picThree, picFour]
//
// gets next picture in array
function nextPic() { // check if adding 1 exceeds number of pics in array
if (picCount.length < maxCount.length) {
picCount = (picCount + 1 < picArray.length) ? picCount + 1 : 5000;
// build the image to write to page using the new pic reference
var build = '<img border="0" src="' + picArray[picCount] + '" width="649">\n';
document.getElementById("imgHolder").innerHTML = build;
// repeat this every 10 seconds.
setTimeout('nextPic()', 10 * 1000) //setTimeout is here
} else {
picCount = (picCount - maxCount < picArray.length) ? picCount + 1 : 5000;
// build the image to write to page using the new pic reference
var build = '<img border="0" src="' + picArray[picCount] + '" width="649">\n';
document.getElementById("imgHolder").innerHTML = build;
// repeat this every 10 seconds.
setTimeout('nextPic()', 10 * 1000) //setTimeout is here
}
}
okay so i hope you guys can help me with this..
That's a lot of messy code.
My fix for an implementation would probably look something like this:
var currentPic = 0;
var picOne = "http://screenshots.nl.sftcdn.net/nl/scrn/3342000/3342167/modloader-for-minecraft-02-700x406.jpg"
var picTwo = "http://media.moddb.com/images/downloads/1/31/30912/minecraft_blox.png"
var picThree = "http://www.mupload.nl/img/rl6zeofbb.png"
var picFour = "http://www.mupload.nl/img/rl6zeofbb.png"
var picArray= [picOne,picTwo,picThree,picFour]
function nextPic() {
if (currentPic < picArray.length) {currentPic++;}
else {currentPic = 0;}
var build='<img border="0" src="'+picArray[currentPic]+'" width="649">';
document.getElementById("imgHolder").innerHTML=build;
// repeat this every 10 seconds.
setTimeout('nextPic()',10 * 1000)//setTimeout is here
}
Despite many other issues which I am sure are present in your code, I believe this line is the cause of your particular problem addressed in the question:
if (picCount.length < maxCount.length) {
maxCount and picCount are just numbers. They do not have a length property. Change it to this:
if (picCount < maxCount) {
var currentPic = 0;
var picArray= ["http://screenshots.nl.sftcdn.net/nl/scrn/3342000/3342167/modloader-for-minecraft-02-700x406.jpg",
"http://media.moddb.com/images/downloads/1/31/30912/minecraft_blox.png",
"http://www.mupload.nl/img/rl6zeofbb.png",
"http://www.mupload.nl/img/rl6zeofbb.png"];
function nextPic() {
(currentPic < picArray.length) ? currentPic++ : currentPic = 0;
var build='<img border="0" src="'+picArray[currentPic]+'" width="649">';
document.getElementById("imgHolder").innerHTML=build;
}
setTimeout('nextPic()',10 * 1000);
I made a few changes that make your code cleaner.
Some tips:
No need to store your image URLs in vars before putting them in the array. Just initialize your array with them.
Don't repeat yourself. Whenever you find yourself using the exact same code in multiple places, you probably need to rethink how you are approaching the problem.
Look up the "ternary operator". In my opinion it makes simple conditional statements easier to read.
No need to use maxCount - the max count will be the length of your picArray.
Although not usually required, try to end all statements with a semicolon.
Don't mind the elitist attitude some people have, but at the same time, try to research as much as you can before asking a question.
I've written a script that fires off 2 URLs based on some random number logic and I'm trying to set a delay before either one is fired (of half a second) but I don't think it's working properly. Am I doing this correctly? Code is below:
var clicks = "http://www.urlone.com";
var impressions = "http://www.urltwo.com";
var randomNumber = (Math.random()*100);
function callOut() {
for (var i = 0; i < lengthVal; i++){
if (randomNumber < 75) {
var randomCounter = (Math.random()*100);
if (randomCounter < 50) {
setTimeout("image1.src = clicks;",500);
}
else if (randomCounter > 50) {
setTimeout("image1.src = impressions;",500);
}
}
}
}
setTimeout first parameter should be a function. Not string of code.
code in the alternate syntax, is a string of code you want to execute after delay milliseconds. (Using this syntax is not recommended for the same reasons as using eval())
MDN
setTimeout(function(){...}, 500);
Taken from here: http://www.codescream.com/?p=18 read it it should help :)
If you want to make a delay with setTimeout you should do exactly this:
setTimeout( function () {
doThings()
}, 1000);
and never this:
setTimeout( "doThings()", 1000);
setTimeout("image1.src = clicks;",500);
For this image1 must be declared in a global context, like this:
var image1 = document.getElementById('image1');
But you better use a function here.
function setImageSrcClicks(){
document.getElementById('image1').src = 'http://clicks_url';
}
setTimeout(setImageSrcClicks,500);
Duly noted about using setTimeout with a string. Here is how I ended up doing it. Is this the 'best' way to do this?
var clicks = "http://www.urlone.com";
var impressions = "http://www.urltwo.com";
var conversions = "http://www.urlthree";
var lengthVal = (Math.random() * 20 + 20);
var image1 = new Image();
var image2 = new Image();
var globalCounter = -1;
function callOut() {
var ord = (Math.random() * 9999999999999) + "";
var randomNumber = (Math.random() * 100); // Random value for each call
if (randomNumber < 75) {
var randomCounter = Math.random() * 100;
alert(randomCounter);
if (randomCounter < 50) {
image1.src = clicks + ord + "?";
}
if (randomCounter > 50) {
image2.src = impressions + ord + "?";
}
}
if (globalCounter++ < lengthVal) {
setTimeout(callOut, 1000); // Call itself after another second
}
}
I have a JSON array(?) of pairs of every state and a value associated with that state, it looks like the following below:
var states = [{"STATE":"AL","AMOUNT":"6"}, {"STATE":"AK","AMOUNT":"3"}]
I need the page to shuffle through them without reloading the page
"AL 6" [wait x seconds] then "AK 3" [wait x seconds] then etc...
I need this to run continuously.
I never use any of these languages but was told that they were my best bet.
Could someone give me some guidance on this please.
Thank you in advance.
Here's a jsfiddle with setInterval execting a function that alternates between each state and displays it in a div:
http://jsfiddle.net/WD5Qj/1/
var states = '[{"STATE":"AL","AMOUNT":"6"}, {"STATE":"AK","AMOUNT":"3"}]';
json = jQuery.parseJSON(states);
var i = 0;
var cycle = function(){
$("#state").html(json[i].STATE + json[i].AMOUNT);
i = (i+1)%json.length;
}
var loop = setInterval(cycle, 500);
Alright, you'd need a function that does the rotation through the array, and a variable for keeping the current state (in both meanings of the word):
var stateIndex = 0;
function rotate() {
stateIndex++;
if(stateIndex >= states.length)
stateIndex = 0;
displayState(states[stateIndex]);
}
And you'd need an interval to perform the rotation:
var stateRotation = window.setInterval(rotate, 3000); // 3000ms = 3 sec
The stateRotation variable is an identifier of your interval. You may use that if you ever want to stop: window.clearInterval(stateRotation);
Now, the above code anticipates a function displayState which takes a state object and displays it. How that would look depends entirely on how you want your state to displayed. In its simplest form, something like this:
function displayState(state) {
$('#state-name').html(state.STATE);
$('#state-amount').html(state.AMOUNT);
}
As per your description, it might perhaps be something more like
$('#state-text').html(state.STATE + ' ' + state.AMOUNT);
var states = [{"STATE":"AL","AMOUNT":"6"}, {"STATE":"AK","AMOUNT":"3"}];
var i = 0;
setInterval(function(){
var array_index = i % states.length;
$('#state').html( states[ array_index ]['STATE'] );
$('#state').html( states[ array_index ]['AMOUNT'] );
i++;
}, 2000);
Here's a fiddle.
function displayNextItem(index){
if (index === states.length)
displayNextItem(0);
$("#someDiv").text(states[index]["STATE"] + " " + states[index]["AMOUNT"]);
setTimeout(function() { displayNextItem(index + 1); }, 1000);
}
And then
displayNextItem(0);
var i = 0, l = states.length, timer, intervalLength = 5000;
timer = setInterval(function(){
if(i >= l){
clearInterval(timer);
}else{
alert(states[i++].STATE);
}
},intervalLength);
This implementation is waiting the AMOUNT number of seconds. If you want constant number of seconds then other answers are better :).
JavaScript:
var states = [{"STATE":"AL","AMOUNT":"6"}, {"STATE":"AK","AMOUNT":"3"}];
function iterate(index) {
var time = states[index].AMOUNT;
// replace the text with new one
$("#output").text(states[index].STATE + " " + time);
setTimeout(function() {
var next = (index + 1) % states.length;
iterate(next);
}, time * 1000);
}
iterate(0);
HERE is the code.
I'm working on a script that fetches and then parses a large amount of XML documents. The relevant part of the code is shown below. (URL has been hidden for privacy. The asterisks in the code are not actually there, they are used for reference later in the question)
var xmlhttp = new XMLHttpRequest();
var xmlDoc;
var chunk = parseInt(1, 10);
var subChunk = parseInt(0, 10);
var indvCount = parseInt(0, 10);
var total = parseInt(0, 10);
var max = parseInt(5000, 10);
var end = parseInt(chunk, 10) * parseInt(20, 10);
var start = parseInt(end, 10) - parseInt(19, 10);
function loadXML() {
xmlhttp.abort();
*xmlhttp.open("GET", "URL-GOES-HERE?start=" + start + "&end=" + end, false);
xmlhttp.setRequestHeader('Content-Type', 'text/xml', 'Pragma', 'no-cache');
xmlhttp.send("");
while (xmlhttp.readyState != 4) { }
xmlDoc = xmlhttp.responseXML;
readXML();
}
function readXML() {
while (subChunk < 20) {
*indvCount = xmlDoc.getElementsByTagName("Value")[subChunk].childNodes[0].nodeValue;
total = parseInt(total, 10) + parseInt(indvCount, 10);
subChunk = parseInt(subChunk, 10) + parseInt(1, 10);
}
chunk = parseInt(chunk, 10) + parseInt(1, 10);
subChunk = parseInt(0, 10)
end = parseInt(chunk, 10) * parseInt(20, 10);
start = parseInt(end, 10) - parseInt(19, 10);
if (chunk > max) {
alert(total);
} else {
loadXML();
}
}
When chunk is equal to approx. 5,000 or more, I get an Out of Memory error. The error usually refers to one of the asterisk'ed lines of code. Using Windows Task Manger, I can confirm that Internet Explorer's memory usage stays at about 6,000K, so I don't think I have a memory leak.
Does anyone know a way to prevent this?
Here's your readXML rewritten to eliminate useless cruft. Critique/questions after the code:
function readXML() {
while (subChunk < 20) {
indvCount = xmlDoc.getElementsByTagName("Value")[subChunk].childNodes[0].nodeValue;
total = total + parseInt(indvCount, 10);
subChunk++;
}
chunk++;
subChunk = 0;
end = chunk * 20;
start = end - 19;
if (chunk > max) {
alert(total);
} else {
loadXML();
}
}
Where do you initialize subChunk? The first time readXML is called, subChunk (if this is all of your code) will be undefined.
Ditto for total. Where does that get defined/initalized?
Ditto for chunk. Where does that get defined initialized?
Ditto for max. Where does that get defined initialized?
Note that I've eliminated all but one parseint. Unless you're doing all kinds of crazy int/string conversions in there, the ONLY place it would strictly be required is to turn your XML-retrieved string into a number for your total count.
Ok. how about re-writing like this... it'd still be using global variables (bad bad bad), but somewhat more correct and and efficient:
function readXML() {
var values = xmlDoc.getElementsByTagName("Value");
for (i = 0; i < values.length; i++) {
total += parseInt(values[i].childNodes[0].nodeValue);
}
chunk++;
end = chunk * 20;
start = end - 19;
if (...) { ... }
}
Your code does a repeated getElementsByTagName call (expensive), accesses one value, then throws away everything else. Does another gEBTN() call, accesses another value, throws away the results, yada yada yada. A major waste of CPU cycles, memory, etc... With the above construct, you do gEBTN() ONCE then iterate over the results, pulling out all the relevant nodes.