HTTP Proxy: Reject half-processed request - javascript

I have HTTP Proxy based on Node.js which transforms response body on fly in stream fashion. For instance, my proxy works like nginx, which compresses (using libz for gzipping) response body.
But I have open question: What if error occures on upstream connection during the data exchange. How to notify client about en error, when response have already been sent and transmitting body is in progress. Complexity of error determination on client side based on fact that Content-Length is absent in response due to source and transformed data mismatch.
To clarify some details I added a simple piece of code:
var express = require("express");
var http = require("http");
var url = require('url');
var webApp = express();
var httpServer = webApp.listen(8080, function () {
console.log("server started on ", 8080, " port");
});
webApp.get("*", function(req, res) {
var targetRequest = http.get(req.originalUrl, function (upstreamResponse) {
if (upstreamResponse.statusCode != 200) {
res.status(500).send("Internal Server Error");
return;
}
upstreamResponse.on("data", function (chunk) {
/// transform chunk and send it to the client
res.write(chunk);
});
upstreamResponse.on("end", function () {
res.end();
});
/// upstream connection error occured
upstreamResponse.on("error", function (error) {
/// How to properly notify client
/// about error ????
/// ????
});
});
});

Actually, the only one way to notify clients about some issues is just to drop downstream connections.

Related

Trying to capture Client IP Address for already running server in localhost, but node.js conflicts with existing server

I am trying to capture client ipaddress for traffic visiting my localhost:8080. I am using the following modules and the node.js application looks like this
var connect = require('connect');
var http = require('http');
var net = require('net');
var express = require('express');
var app = express();
var app = connect();
// require request-ip and register it as middleware
var requestIp = require('request-ip');
// you can override which attirbute the ip will be set on by
// passing in an options object with an attributeName
app.use(requestIp.mw({ attributeName : 'myCustomAttributeName' }))
// respond to all requests
app.use(function(req, res) {
// use our custom attributeName that we registered in the middleware
var ip = req.myCustomAttributeName;
console.log(ip);
fs.appendFile('iplist.csv', ip, 'utf8', function (err) {
if (err) {
console.log('Some error occured - file either not saved or corrupted file saved');
} else{
console.log('It\'s saved!');
}
});
// https://nodejs.org/api/net.html#net_net_isip_input
// var ipType = net.isIP(ip); // returns 0 for invalid, 4 for IPv4, and 6 for IPv6
// res.end('IP address is ' + ip + ' and is of type IPv' + ipType + '\n');
});
//create node.js http server and listen on port
app.listen(8080);
Is there any way I can listen to the already existing server without creating my own, hence avoiding the conflict of two servers fighting for the same port. I am new to node.js. Any help will be great. Thank you!

Using Socket.IO from Node.js to connect to external server

Background: I have a node.js server running on my localhost (call this Server A); and an external server running node.js at https://example.net:3000 (call this Server B). I do not control or have access to Server B (it is a dashboard site for an IoT device in my home), but I need to connect to is using socket.io and emit a specific message.
I can connect to it easily from a flat javascript file (client-side), but need it running server side (ultimate goal is to make it into something I can call with an HTTP request); and examples such as How to connect two node.js servers with websockets? suggest I should be able to use socket.io-client from node.js with nearly the same code to achieve the same results. But when I run the code from node.js, I cannot connect to the socket.
Below is the code that works successfully in flat javascript file. I know it works because I see 'socket connect' in the console, and I can also test for the the socket emit at the end.
var myemail = "email#gmail.com";
var device_id = '12345';
// Create SocketIO instance, connect
var socket = io.connect('https://example.net:3000');
socket.on('connect', function(){
try {
console.log('socket connect');
socket.emit('configure', {email:myemail, deviceid:device_id});
} catch(e) {
console.log(e);
}
});
socket.emit("/" + device_id, "45678");
...and below is the code I cannot get to work when running from my node.js instance. I'd expect a message 'socket connect' in the command line log and get nothing.
var express=require('express');
var http=require('http');
var app=express();
var server = http.createServer(app);
//Variables
var myemail = "email#gmail.com";
var device_id = '12345';
var io = require('socket.io-client');
var socket = io.connect('https://example.net:3000');
//Connect listener
socket.on('connect', function(){
try {
console.log('socket connect');
socket.emit('configure', {email:myemail, deviceid:device_id});
} catch(e) {
console.log(e);
}
});
socket.emit("/" + device_id, "45678");
Any ideas?
UPDATE
Ran debug utility, results included as linked image below. Key thing I see is that engine.io tries to do an xhr poll, and gets a 503 response back from the server. (Obviously not a true 'temporary error' with the server as again, this all works from running client-side js in chrome).
debugging output image link
Solved this - issue was that the server I was connecting to required use of https, so I needed to add
{secure: true, rejectUnauthorized: false}
after the url to connect to.
Full working example:
const myemail = email#email.com;
const device_id = 12345;
io = require('socket.io-client');
var socket = io.connect('https://server.net:3000',{secure: true, rejectUnauthorized: false});
function doStuff(){
//Listener
socket.on('connect', function(){
try {
console.log('socket connect');
socket.emit('configure', {email:myemail, deviceid:device_id});
} catch(e) {
console.log(e);
}
});
socket.emit("/" + device_id, "003021");
}
doStuff();
I think the line causing the issue is :
var socket = io.connect('https://example.net:3000');
I managed to make a working example using this code :
const myemail = "email#gmail.com";
const device_id = '12345';
var socket = require('socket.io-client')('https://example.net:3000');
socket.on('connect', function(){
try{
console.log('socket connect');
socket.emit('configure', {email:myemail, deviceid:device_id});
}catch(e){ console.log(e); }
});

why websocket connection creation does not pass through http?

i tumbled across websocket and http.
I have written below example:
var fs = require('fs');
var server = http.createServer(function(request, response) {
console.log ("HTTP Request created...");
// I am responding something here..
});
server.listen(1234, function() {
console.log((new Date()) + ' Server is listening on port 1234');
});
var WebSocketServer = require('websocket').server;
wsServer = new WebSocketServer({
httpServer: server
});
wsServer.on('request', function(re){
var conn = re.accept(null, re.origin);
console.log ("Accepted New Connection..");
conn.on('message', function(message) {
console.log ('message received' + message.utf8Data);
});
});
I tried in two ways connecting to this server.
1) Through Browser.
2) through node.js application
When I tried reaching this server through browser ex: http:IP:1234,
I get "HTTP Request received.." gets printed, where as when I try with
below code in Node.js, I do not see this message getting printed.
var WebSocket = require('ws')
ws = new WebSocket('ws://IP:1234');
ws.on('open', function() {
console.log ("WebSocket opened..");
ws.send('something');
});
ws.on('message', function(message) {
console.log('received: %s', message.data);
});
When I tried to connect to webserver through
ws = new WebSocket('ws://IP:1234');
why is It not getting through HTTP?. My basic understanding is Websocket is just an upgrade on top of HTTP, in that case, I would assume WebSocket(), in turn connectes through HTTP to the server right?. Or Am i confused?.
Websocket requests don't trigger a request event on the HTTP server instance (for which the function you pass to createServer is a listener).
If you want to watch websocket requests on the HTTP server, listen to upgrade events:
server.on('upgrade', function (req, socket, head) { ... });
I assume it's because http will handle the handshake/upgrade itself that this is done through a different event.

Node js Error: Protocol "https:" not supported. Expected "http:"

I am using IBM Bluemix to make a web service for a school project.
My project needs to request a JSON from an API, so I can use the data it provides. I use the http get method for a data set, and I am not sure if it is working properly.
When I run my code, I get the message:
Error: Protocol "https:" not supported. Expected "http:"
What is causing it and how can I solve it?
Here is my .js file:
// Hello.
//
// This is JSHint, a tool that helps to detect errors and potential
// problems in your JavaScript code.
//
// To start, simply enter some JavaScript anywhere on this page. Your
// report will appear on the right side.
//
// Additionally, you can toggle specific options in the Configure
// menu.
function main() {
return 'Hello, World!';
}
main();/*eslint-env node*/
//------------------------------------------------------------------------------
// node.js starter application for Bluemix
//------------------------------------------------------------------------------
// HTTP request - duas alternativas
var http = require('http');
var request = require('request');
// cfenv provides access to your Cloud Foundry environment
// for more info, see: https://www.npmjs.com/package/cfenv
var cfenv = require('cfenv');
//chama o express, que abre o servidor
var express = require('express');
// create a new express server
var app = express();
// serve the files out of ./public as our main files
app.use(express.static(__dirname + '/public'));
// get the app environment from Cloud Foundry
var appEnv = cfenv.getAppEnv();
// start server on the specified port and binding host
app.listen(appEnv.port, '0.0.0.0', function() {
// print a message when the server starts listening
console.log("server starting on " + appEnv.url);
});
app.get('/home1', function (req,res) {
http.get('http://developers.agenciaideias.com.br/cotacoes/json', function (res2) {
var body = '';
res2.on('data', function (chunk) {
body += chunk;
});
res2.on('end', function () {
var json = JSON.parse(body);
var CotacaoDolar = json["dolar"]["cotacao"];
var VariacaoDolar = json["dolar"]["variacao"];
var CotacaoEuro = json["euro"]["cotacao"];
var VariacaoEuro = json["euro"]["variacao"];
var Atualizacao = json["atualizacao"];
obj=req.query;
DolarUsuario=obj['dolar'];
RealUsuario=Number(obj['dolar'])*CotacaoDolar;
EuroUsuario=obj['euro'];
RealUsuario2=Number(obj['euro'])*CotacaoEuro;
Oi=1*VariacaoDolar;
Oi2=1*VariacaoEuro;
if (VariacaoDolar<0) {
recomend= "Recomenda-se, portanto, comprar dólares.";
}
else if (VariacaoDolar=0){
recomend="";
}
else {
recomend="Recomenda-se, portanto, vender dólares.";
}
if (VariacaoEuro<0) {
recomend2= "Recomenda-se, portanto, comprar euros.";
}
else if (VariacaoEuro=0){
recomend2="";
}
else {
recomend2="Recomenda-se,portanto, vender euros.";
}
res.render('cotacao_response.jade', {
'CotacaoDolar':CotacaoDolar,
'VariacaoDolar':VariacaoDolar,
'Atualizacao':Atualizacao,
'RealUsuario':RealUsuario,
'DolarUsuario':DolarUsuario,
'CotacaoEuro':CotacaoEuro,
'VariacaoEuro':VariacaoEuro,
'RealUsuario2':RealUsuario2,
'recomend':recomend,
'recomend2':recomend2,
'Oi':Oi,
'Oi2':Oi2
});
app.get('/home2', function (req,res) {
http.get('https://www.quandl.com/api/v3/datasets/BCB/432.json?api_key=d1HxqKq2esLRKDmZSHR2', function (res3) {
var body = '';
res3.on('data', function (chunk) {
body += chunk;
});
res3.on('end', function () {
var x=json.dataset.data[0][1];
console.log("My JSON is "+x); });
});
});
});
});
});
Here is a print of the error screen I get:
When you want to request an https resource, you need to use https.get, not http.get.
https://nodejs.org/api/https.html
As a side note to anyone looking for a solution from Google... make sure you are not using an http.Agent with an https request or you will get this error.
The reason for this error is that you are trying to call a HTTPS URI from a HTTP client. The ideal solution would have been for a generic module to figure out the URI protocol and take the decision to use HTTPS or HTTP internally.
The way I overcame this problem is by using the switching logic on my own.
Below is some code which did the switching for me.
var http = require('http');
var https = require('https');
// Setting http to be the default client to retrieve the URI.
var url = new URL("https://www.google.com")
var client = http; /* default client */
// You can use url.protocol as well
/*if (url.toString().indexOf("https") === 0){
client = https;
}*/
/* Enhancement : using the URL.protocol parameter
* the URL object , provides a parameter url.protocol that gives you
* the protocol value ( determined by the protocol ID before
* the ":" in the url.
* This makes it easier to determine the protocol, and to support other
* protocols like ftp , file etc)
*/
client = (url.protocol == "https:") ? https : client;
// Now the client is loaded with the correct Client to retrieve the URI.
var req = client.get(url, function(res){
// Do what you wanted to do with the response 'res'.
console.log(res);
});
Not sure why, but the issue for me happened after updating node to version 17, i was previously using version 12.
In my setup, i have node-fetch using HttpsProxyAgent as an agent in the options object.
options['agent'] = new HttpsProxyAgent(`http://${process.env.AWS_HTTP_PROXY}`)
response = await fetch(url, options)
Switching back to node 12 fixed the problem:
nvm use 12.18.3
I got this error while deploying the code.
INFO error=> TypeError [ERR_INVALID_PROTOCOL]: Protocol "https:" not supported. Expected "http:"
at new NodeError (node:internal/errors:372:5)
To fix this issue, I have updated the "https-proxy-agent" package version to "^5.0.0"
Now the error was gone and it's working for me.

Send message between two independent running processes in Node.js

I've got an Adobe AIR Application on the local machine that communicates with an remote node.js server script (socket-script.js) via socket connection.
Furthermore i start a new node.js process through command line and send some additional arguments to a second server script (terminal-script.js).
Question: How can i send the arguments from the terminal-script.js to socket-script.js? Afterwards the socket-script.js should broadcast the
args to the AIR Application. Anyone an idea how to connect the two independent running processes in Node.js? Thanks.
Illustration link
Use the server to communicate between processes:
socket-script.js
var net = require('net');
var app = null;
var server = net.createServer(function(socket) {
socket.on('data', function(data){
if(data.indexOf('terminal:') >-1){
if(app){
app.write(data);
}
} else if(data.indexOf('app:') >-1){
app = socket;
}
});
});
terminal-script.js:
var net = require('net');
var client = net.connect({port: 9001}, function() {
client.write('terminal:' + process.argv[2]);
});
app:
var net = require('net');
var client = net.connect({port: 9001}, function() {
client.write('app:connect');
});
client.on('data', function(data){
if(data.indexOf('terminal:') >-1){
// got terminal data
}
});
The only way that I conceive of to make this work is something like this:
1) You'll need to have terminal-script.js be listening on a socket. Like so:
var arguments = process.args.splice(2);
var http = require('http');
http.createServer(function (req, res) {
res.writeHead(200, {'Content-Type': 'text/plain'});
res.end(arguments[0]);
}).listen(8000, '127.0.0.1');
2) Just make a request from socket-script to the terminal script:
//somewhere in socket-script use this to grab the value from the terminal script.
var http = require('http');
var options = {
host: 'terminal-script-host.com',
port: '8000',
path: '/'
};
var req = http.get(options, function(res) {
res.on('data', function (data) {
console.log('socket-script got the data from terminal-script: ' + data);
});
});
Not sure if this helps. But I can tell you that it would be nearly impossible to "inject" something into the socket-script from the terminal-script, not in a way that would work with the same request anyways.

Categories