I was trying to declare a directive, it is apparently right but when I load it in html nothing occurs.
This is the code:
(function() {
'use strict';
var app = angular
.module('App');
app.directive('directiveFunction', directiveFunction);
function directiveFunction(){
return {
restrict: 'EA',
replace: true,
template: '<div>Example</div>',
controller: directiveController,
controllerAs: 'example',
bindToController: true,
link: linkFunction
}
}
linkFunction.$inject = ['$scope', 'elem', 'attrs', 'ctrl'];
function linkFunction(scope, element, attrs, ctrl) {}
function directiveController() {
var example = this;
}
})();
I call this in html as <directive-function></directive-function> but it does nothing.
I created a fiddle for you.. you are doing all well, I think that you are using it like
https://jsbin.com/koporel/edit?html,js,output
<directiveFunction></directiveFunction>
No, use - where case changes, like
<directive-function></directive-function>
Related
Fixed the issue, here is the final fiddle that shows it working:
http://jsfiddle.net/mbaranski/tfLeexdc/
I have a directive:
var StepFormDirective = function ($timeout, $sce, dataFactory, $rootScope) {
return {
replace: false,
restrict: 'AE',
scope: {
context: "=",
title: "="
},
template: '<h3>{{title}}</h3><form id="actionForm" class="step-form"></form><button ng-click="alert()" type="button">Save</button>',
link: function (scope, elem, attrs) {
}
}
}
How do I make the alert() do something from the controller?
Here is a fiddle:
http://jsfiddle.net/mbaranski/tfLeexdc/
Angular can be twitchy, so I've built a whole new fiddle to demonstrate all of the "glue-up" pieces you need to make this work.
First, you weren't passing the properties through to the directive, so I've made that adjustment:
// You have to pass the function in as an attribute
<hello-directive list="osList" func="myFunc()"></hello-directive>
Second, you were using onclick instead of ng-click in your template, which was part of the problem, so I made that switch:
// You need to use "ng-click" instead of "onclick"
template: '<h3>{{list}}</h3><button ng-click="func()" type="button">Button</button>',
And lastly, you need to bind the function in the scope of the directive, and then call it by the bound name:
scope: {
list: "=",
// Bind the function as a function to the attribute from the directive
func: "&"
},
Here's a Working Fiddle
All of this glued up together looks like this:
HTML
<div ng-controller="MyCtrl">
Hello, {{name}}!
<hello-directive list="osList" func="myFunc()"></hello-directive>
</div>
Javascript
var myApp = angular.module('myApp', []);
function MyCtrl($scope) {
$scope.name = 'Angular Directive';
$scope.osList = "Original value";
$scope.stuffFromController = {};
$scope.myFunc = function(){ alert("Function in controller");};
};
var HelloDirective = function() {
return {
scope: {
list: "=",
func: "&"
}, // use a new isolated scope
restrict: 'AE',
replace: false,
template: '<h3>{{list}}</h3><button ng-click="func()" type="button">Button</button>',
link: function(scope, elem, attrs) {
}
};
};
myApp.directive("helloDirective", HelloDirective);
If you'd like to execute a function defined somewhere else, make sure you pass it in by the scope directive attribute.
Here you can do:
scope: {
context: '=',
title: '=',
alert='&' // '&' is for functions
}
In the place where you using the directive, you'll pass the "expression" of the function (meaning not just the function, but the actual invocation of the function you want to happen when the click occurs.
<step-form-directive alert="alert()" title=".." context=".."></step-form-directive>
I have a directive that wraps another one like this :
<div direction from="origin" to="destination">
<div direction-map line-color="#e84c3d"></div>
</div>
the direction-map directive is transcluded, see my code (Fiddle available here) :
var directionController = function() {
//do stuffs
};
var directionMapController = function() {
//do other stuffs
};
var Direction = angular.module("direction", [])
.controller("directionController", directionController)
.controller("directionMapController", directionMapController)
.directive("direction", function() {
var directive = {
restrict: "AEC",
controller: "directionController",
scope: {},
transclude: true,
link: {
pre: function($scope, $element, attrs, controller, transclude) {
console.log("direction's controller is directionController : ");
console.log(controller.constructor === directionController);//true, that's ok
transclude($scope, function(clone) {
$element.append(clone);
});
}
}
};
return directive;
})
.directive("directionMap", function() {
var directive = {
require: "^direction",
controller: "directionMapController",
restrict: "AEC",
scope: true,
link: {
pre: function($scope, $element, $attrs, controller) {
console.log("directionMap's controller is directionMapController :");
console.log(controller.constructor===directionMapController);//false that's not OK!!!!
}
}
};
return directive;
});
So my question is:
Why my child directive direction-map gets as parameter the controller of its parent (I think it's because it is transcluded), is it possible to avoid this or should I just re-think my code ?
It's happening beacause you are using require: "^direction" if you remove this line the directive will get the controller of itself rather than the parent one.
Hope it help :)
Updated Fiddle
I have AngularJs directive accordionPanel that requires controller of parent directive accordion. I need to test accordionPanel directive to see if model changes when I call foldUnfold function. How would I write unit test to see if the model changes on foldUnfold call. Thats simplified version of my directives and test I got so far is below that:
.directive("accordion", [
function() {
return {
templateUrl: "otherurl",
transclude: true,
replace: true,
scope: {
},
controller: ["$scope",function($scope) {
this.isOneOpenOnly = function() {
return $scope.oneOpenOnly;
}
}],
link: function(scope, elem, attrs, ctrl, linker) {
// some code
}
}
}
])
.directive("accordionPanel", [
function() {
return {
templateUrl: "urlblah",
transclude: true,
replace: true,
require: "^accordion",
scope: {},
link: function(scope, elem, attrs, ctrl, linker) {
scope.foldUnfold = function() {
// some logic here then
scope.changeThisModel=ctrl.isOneOpenOnly();
}
}
}
}
])
Thats my test so far:
it('Should return unfolded as true', function() {
var scope=$rootScope.$new(),
element=$compile("<div accordion><div accordion-panel></div></div>")(scope);
scope.$digest();
scope.foldUnfold(); // this is fails as scope refers to accordion but I need to access accordionPanel
expect(scope.changeThisModel).toBe(true);
});
The problem is I cannot get access to accordionPanel scope where foldUnfold sits. I think it might be possible to access it via $$childHead and such, but even if possible it doesn't seem like the right way to do. How would I test it then?
Can't seem to figure out why this is not working...
What I'm trying to do:
I need to be able to share the controller from the mainContent directive with the directive for focus and I keep getting this error: Cannot set property 'element' of undefined.
I'm practically copying/pasting from this example : https://www.codeschool.com/screencasts/egghead-io-flexible-angular-directives : so I'm not sure why it isn't working?
Relevant Code:
//html
<mainContent id="mainContent">
<focus>whatever</focus>
</mainContent>
//js
angular.module('home', [])
.directive('mainContent', mainContent)
.directive('focus', focus);
mainContent.$inject = [];
function mainContent() {
return {
restrict: 'E',
scope: {},
controller: function($scope) {
$scope.element = '';
}
}
}
focus.$inject = [];
function focus() {
return {
restrict: 'E',
transclude: true,
template: '<div id="focus"><div ng-transclude></div></div>',
require: '^?mainContent', // also tried 'mainContent' && '^mainContent'
link: function(scope, elem, attrs, ctrl) {
ctrl.element = 'such wow';
}
};
}
(yes, I know this syntax isn't as common however it follows the style guides for my project)
Thanks in advance, any help is very much appreciated!
I have multiple AngularJS directives that are nearly identical - there are only two differences: the template URL and one single element in the linking function. Both are constant for each directive. So, for simplicity's sake, this is how it looks like:
app.directive("myDirective", [function() {
return {
templateUrl: "this/path/changes.html",
scope: true,
link: function(scope, element, attrs) {
var veryImportantString = "this_string_changes";
// a few dozen lines of code identical to all directives
}
};
}]);
Now, moving the linking function to a commonly available place is obvious. What is not so obvious to me is how to set that "very important string" on the scope (or otherwise pass it to the directive) without declaring it in the HTML.
Here's what I've tried.
app.directive("myDirective", [function() {
return {
templateUrl: "this/path/changes.html",
scope: {
veryImportantString: "this_string_changes"
},
link: someCommonFunction
};
}]);
Nope, apparently the scope config doesn't take values from nobody. I can bind a value coming from the HTML attribute, but this is precisely what I don't want to do.
Also tried this:
app.directive("myDirective", [function() {
return {
templateUrl: "this/path/changes.html",
veryImportantString: "this_string_changes",
scope: true,
link: function(scope, element, attrs) {
var veryImportantString = this.veryImportantString;
}
};
}]);
But alas, the linking function is then called with this set to something else.
I assume this might work:
app.directive("myDirective", [function() {
return {
templateUrl: "this/path/changes.html",
scope: true,
compile: function(element, attrs) {
// no access to the scope...
attrs.veryImportantString = "this_string_changes";
return someCommonFunction;
}
};
}]);
However, I am not 100% sure this is what I want either, as it reeks of being a dirty workaround.
What are my other options?
I have devised a completely different approach: using a factory-like function to spawn directives.
var factory = function(name, template, importantString) {
app.directive(name, [function() {
return {
scope: true,
templateUrl: template,
link: function(scope, element, attrs) {
var veryImportantString = importantString;
// directive logic...
}
};
}]);
};
Then, in order to create individual directives, I simply call:
factory("myDirective", "/path/to/template.html", "important");
factory("myDirective2", "/path/to/template2.html", "important2");
What about the following:
Before wherever you define someCommonFunction, add the line
var veryImportantString = "someOptionalDefault"
This then puts veryImportantString in scope of both your someCommonFunction and .directive()
Then you can change your directive code to:
app.directive("myDirective", [function() {
return {
templateUrl: "this/path/changes.html",
scope: true,
link: function(args){
veryImportantString = "thatUberImportantValue";
someCommonFunction(args);
}
};
}]);
Proof of concept fiddle