Can't seem to figure out why this is not working...
What I'm trying to do:
I need to be able to share the controller from the mainContent directive with the directive for focus and I keep getting this error: Cannot set property 'element' of undefined.
I'm practically copying/pasting from this example : https://www.codeschool.com/screencasts/egghead-io-flexible-angular-directives : so I'm not sure why it isn't working?
Relevant Code:
//html
<mainContent id="mainContent">
<focus>whatever</focus>
</mainContent>
//js
angular.module('home', [])
.directive('mainContent', mainContent)
.directive('focus', focus);
mainContent.$inject = [];
function mainContent() {
return {
restrict: 'E',
scope: {},
controller: function($scope) {
$scope.element = '';
}
}
}
focus.$inject = [];
function focus() {
return {
restrict: 'E',
transclude: true,
template: '<div id="focus"><div ng-transclude></div></div>',
require: '^?mainContent', // also tried 'mainContent' && '^mainContent'
link: function(scope, elem, attrs, ctrl) {
ctrl.element = 'such wow';
}
};
}
(yes, I know this syntax isn't as common however it follows the style guides for my project)
Thanks in advance, any help is very much appreciated!
Related
I am trying to pass 2 scope variables from controller into a custom directive and having problem in accessing both of them.Model is same for the directive and controller.
Here is the code:
Html:
<myDirective data="var1" item="var2"></myDirective>
Controller:
$scope.var1="abc";
$scope.var2="xyz";
Directive:
app.directive('myDirective', function () {
return {
restrict: 'E', //E = element, A = attribute, C = class, M = comment
scope: {
var1: '='
var2:'='
},
templateUrl: 'myTemplate.html',
link: function ($scope, element, attrs) {
}
}
});
TemplateUrl: myTemplate.html
<div>{{var1}}</div> // This works
<div>{{var2}}</div> // This doesn't works
Any idea how can I use both?
Make these changes in your code
<popover data="var1" item="var2"></popover>
JS
app.directive('popover', function () {
return {
restrict: 'E', //E = element, A = attribute, C = class, M = comment
scope: {
data: '=',
item: '='
},
templateUrl: 'myTemplate.html',
link: function (scope, element, attrs) {
console.log(scope.data, scope.item);
}
}
});
Change your template to match the names declared in the DDO.
<myDirective var1="var1" var2="var2"></myDirective>
Avoid using data as an attribute name. That is a reserved prefix that is stripped during normalization. For more information on attribute normilization, see AngularJS Developer Guide - Directive Normilization.
I've created some basic directive. It works well if I use it with some objects in html file
<some-directive some-data="123"></some-directive>
But if I dynamically load this object to my webpage:
//getting html source as a string, then appending it to DOM:
elem.html("<some-directive some-data='123'></some-directive>");
The directive doesn't work (object is being added properly to DOM)
app.directive('someDirective', function (notes, parts) {
return {
restrict: 'AE',
scope: {
someData: '='
},
link: function (scope, elem, attrs) {
console.log("directive fired");
}
};
});
What can I do to make it work properly?
For dynamic directives, you have to use $compile service that compiles scope into template. Look at sample below, <some-directive-wrapper /> will add <some-directive /> element into itself and compile scope value
var app = angular.module('app', []);
app.directive('someDirective', function () {
return {
restrict: 'AE',
scope: {
someData: '='
},
template: '<h2>someDirective compiled, someData is {{someData}}</h2>',
link: function (scope, elem, attrs) {
console.log("directive fired");
}
};
});
app.directive('someDirectiveWrapper', function ($compile) {
return {
restrict: 'AE',
link: function (scope, elem, attrs) {
//get value from ajax maybe
//and set to scope
scope.data = 123;
//replace directive with another directive
elem.html('<h1>someDirectiveWrapper compiled </h1>\n<some-directive some-data="data"></some-directive>');
//compile scope value into template
$compile(elem.contents())(scope);
}
};
});
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/angularjs/1.2.23/angular.min.js"></script>
<div ng-app="app">
<some-directive-wrapper></some-directive-wrapper>
</div>
I was trying to declare a directive, it is apparently right but when I load it in html nothing occurs.
This is the code:
(function() {
'use strict';
var app = angular
.module('App');
app.directive('directiveFunction', directiveFunction);
function directiveFunction(){
return {
restrict: 'EA',
replace: true,
template: '<div>Example</div>',
controller: directiveController,
controllerAs: 'example',
bindToController: true,
link: linkFunction
}
}
linkFunction.$inject = ['$scope', 'elem', 'attrs', 'ctrl'];
function linkFunction(scope, element, attrs, ctrl) {}
function directiveController() {
var example = this;
}
})();
I call this in html as <directive-function></directive-function> but it does nothing.
I created a fiddle for you.. you are doing all well, I think that you are using it like
https://jsbin.com/koporel/edit?html,js,output
<directiveFunction></directiveFunction>
No, use - where case changes, like
<directive-function></directive-function>
I have a directive that wraps another one like this :
<div direction from="origin" to="destination">
<div direction-map line-color="#e84c3d"></div>
</div>
the direction-map directive is transcluded, see my code (Fiddle available here) :
var directionController = function() {
//do stuffs
};
var directionMapController = function() {
//do other stuffs
};
var Direction = angular.module("direction", [])
.controller("directionController", directionController)
.controller("directionMapController", directionMapController)
.directive("direction", function() {
var directive = {
restrict: "AEC",
controller: "directionController",
scope: {},
transclude: true,
link: {
pre: function($scope, $element, attrs, controller, transclude) {
console.log("direction's controller is directionController : ");
console.log(controller.constructor === directionController);//true, that's ok
transclude($scope, function(clone) {
$element.append(clone);
});
}
}
};
return directive;
})
.directive("directionMap", function() {
var directive = {
require: "^direction",
controller: "directionMapController",
restrict: "AEC",
scope: true,
link: {
pre: function($scope, $element, $attrs, controller) {
console.log("directionMap's controller is directionMapController :");
console.log(controller.constructor===directionMapController);//false that's not OK!!!!
}
}
};
return directive;
});
So my question is:
Why my child directive direction-map gets as parameter the controller of its parent (I think it's because it is transcluded), is it possible to avoid this or should I just re-think my code ?
It's happening beacause you are using require: "^direction" if you remove this line the directive will get the controller of itself rather than the parent one.
Hope it help :)
Updated Fiddle
I have a directive with a bound doc model from controller. But the directive does not show the document?
HTML:
<div ng-app="myApp">TestApp:
<div ng-controller="TestController as Test">Testdoc controller: {{Test.doc}}
<br>
<test-me ng-init="abc=123" my-model="Test.doc">Testdoc directive: {{myDoc}} | {{abc}}</test-me>
</div>
</div>
JS:
var app = angular.module("myApp", []);
app.controller("TestController", function () {
this.doc = {
name: 'testname',
id: null
};
});
app.directive("testMe", function () {
return {
scope: {
myDoc: '=myModel'
},
link: function(scope, elem, attrs){
}
}
});
output HTML is still:
TestApp:
Testdoc controller: {"name":"testname","id":null}
Testdoc directive: <missing output of doc here>| 123
jsfiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/kx97y93k/14/
What i am doing wrong?
Solution was not to call {{myDoc}} in html directly but inside a template.
app.directive("testMe", function () {
return {
restrict: 'E',
template: '<div>Testdirective: {{myDoc}}<div>',
scope: {
myDoc: '=myModel'
},
link: function(scope, elem, attrs){
}
}
});
See updated jsfiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/kx97y93k/18/
Many thanks to #Mr_Green for that hint
add restrict : 'E' to the DDO, see below. Angular 1.2 uses restrict : 'A' if not explicitly set otherwise. For Angular 1.3 that became 'EA' and your directive would have worked. To make it work in your fiddle, change it as follows:
app.directive("testMe", function () {
return {
restrict : 'E',
scope: {
myDoc: '=myModel'
},
link: function(scope, elem, attrs){
}
}
});