I want to query my Workout Collection for the latest workout from a routine. Meaning I query with whereEqualTo my routineKey, order it by the Started TimeStamp in descending order and then limit to 1 and then take the this 1st Key/Id of the Workout.
However this does not work. whereEqualTo and orderBy work separately but not combined. What am I doing wrong?
fm.getColRefWorkout().whereEqualTo("routineKey", routineKey).orderBy("startTimeStamp", Query.Direction.DESCENDING).limit(1).get().addOnSuccessListener(new OnSuccessListener<QuerySnapshot>() {
#Override
public void onSuccess(QuerySnapshot documentSnapshots) {
workoutKey = documentSnapshots.getDocuments().get(0).getId();
//To stuff with this workoutKey
}
});
This query will not work unless you create an index for it. This can be done, by creating it manually in your Firebase Console or if you are using Android Studio, you'll find in your logcat a message that sounds like this:
FAILED_PRECONDITION: The query requires an index. You can create it here: ...
You can simply click on that link or copy and paste the URL into a web browser and your index will be created automatically.
I am using Cloud Firestore as my database
This is my form codes on my webpage that creates a new document into my Cloud Firestore collection called "esequiz". So how do I code it in such a way that it always plus 1 to the number of documents there are in the database? And also set a limit to having the amount of documents inside the database
form.addEventListener('submit', (e) => {
e.preventDefault();
db.collection('esequiz').add({
question: form.question.value,
right: form.right.value,
wrong: form.wrong.value
});
form.question.value = '';
form.right.value = '';
form.wrong.value = '';
});
It currently works but it will show up as an auto generated ID. How do I make it carry on from the numbers, like as my current documents? When i save I would like it to read the current last document id, OR simply count the number of documents, then just + 1
Insight from Andrei Cusnir, counting documents in Cloud Firestore is not supported.
Now I am trying Andrei's approach 2, to query documents in descending order, then using .limit to retrieve the first one only.
UPDATED
form.addEventListener('submit', (e) => {
e.preventDefault();
let query = db.collection('esequiz');
let getvalue = query.orderBy('id', 'desc').limit(1).get();
let newvalue = getvalue + 1;
db.collection('esequiz').doc(newvalue).set({
question: form.question.value,
right: form.right.value,
wrong: form.wrong.value
});
form.question.value = '';
form.right.value = '';
form.wrong.value = '';
});
No more error, but instead, the code below returns [object Promise]
let getvalue = query.orderBy('id', 'desc').limit(1).get();
So when my form saves, it saves as [object Promise]1, which I don't know why it is like this. Can someone advise me on how to return the document id value instead of [object Promise]
I think it is because I did specify to pull the document id as the value, how do I do so?
UPDATED: FINAL SOLUTION
Played around with the codes from Andrei, and here are the final codes that works. Much thanks to Andrei!
let query = db.collection('esequiz');
//let getvalue = query.orderBy('id', 'desc').limit(1).get();
//let newvalue = getvalue + 1;
query.orderBy('id', 'desc').limit(1).get().then(querySnapshot => {
querySnapshot.forEach(documentSnapshot => {
var newID = documentSnapshot.id;
console.log(`Found document at ${documentSnapshot.ref.path}`);
console.log(`Document's ID: ${documentSnapshot.id}`);
var newvalue = parseInt(newID, 10) + 1;
var ToString = ""+ newvalue;
db.collection('esequiz').doc(ToString).set({
id: newvalue,
question: form.question.value,
right: form.right.value,
wrong: form.wrong.value
});
});
});
If I understood correctly you are adding data to the Cloud Firestore and each new document will have as name an incremental number.
If you query all the documents and then count how many are of them, then you are going to end up with many document reads as the database increases. Don't forget that Cloud Firestore is charging per document Read and Write, therefore if you have 100 documents and you want to add new document with ID: 101, then with the approach of first reading all of them and then counting them will cost you 100 Reads and then 1 Write. The next time it will cost you 101 Reads and 1 Write. And it will go on as your database increases.
The way I see is from two different approaches:
Approach 1:
You can have a single document that will hold all the information of the database and what the next name should be.
e.g.
The structure of the database:
esequiz:
0:
last_document: 2
1:
question: "What is 3+3?
right: "6"
wrong: "0"
2:
question: "What is 2+3?
right: "5"
wrong: "0"
So the process will go as follows:
Read document "/esequiz/0" Counts as 1 READ
Create new document with ID: last_document + 1 Counts as 1 WRITE
Update the document that holds the information: last_document = 3; Counts as 1 WRITE
This approach cost you 1 READ and 2 WRITES to the database.
Approach 2:
You can load only the last document from the database and get it's ID.
e.g.
The structure of the database (Same as before, but without the additional doc):
esequiz:
1:
question: "What is 3+3?
right: "6"
wrong: "0"
2:
question: "What is 2+3?
right: "5"
wrong: "0"
So the process will go as follows:
Read the last document using the approach described in Order and limit data with Cloud Firestore documentation. So you can use direction=firestore.Query.DESCENDING with combination of limit(1) which will give you the last document. Counts as 1 READ
Now you know the ID of the loaded document so you can create new document with ID: that will use the loaded value and increase it by 1. Counts as 1 WRITE
This approach cost you 1 READ and 1 WRITE in total to the database.
I hope that this information was helpful and it resolves your issue. Currently counting documents in Cloud Firestore is not supported.
UPDATE
In order for the sorting to work, you will also have to include the id as a filed of the document that so you can be able to order based on it. I have tested the following example and it is working for me:
Structure of database:
esequiz:
1:
id: 1
question: "What is 3+3?
right: "6"
wrong: "0"
2:
id:2
question: "What is 2+3?
right: "5"
wrong: "0"
As you can see the ID is set the same as the document's ID.
Now you can query all the documents and order based on that filed. At the same time you can only retrieve the last document from the query:
const {Firestore} = require('#google-cloud/firestore');
const firestore = new Firestore();
async function getLastDocument(){
let query = firestore.collection('esequiz');
query.orderBy('id', 'desc').limit(1).get().then(querySnapshot => {
querySnapshot.forEach(documentSnapshot => {
console.log(`Found document at ${documentSnapshot.ref.path}`);
console.log(`Document's ID: ${documentSnapshot.id}`);
});
});
}
OUTPUT:
Found document at esequiz/2
Document's ID: 2
Then you can take the ID and increase it by 1 to generate the name for your new document!
UPDATE 2
So, the initial question is about "How to store data in the Cloud Firestore with documents having incremental ID", at the moment you are facing issues of setting up Firestore with you project. Unfortunately, the new raised questions should be discussed in another Stackoverflow post as they have nothing to do with the logic of having incremental IDs for the document and it is better to keep one issue per question, to give better community support for members that are looking for a solution about particular issues. Therefore, I will try to help you, in this post, to execute a simple Node.js script and resolve the initial issue, which is storing to Cloud Firestore documents with incremental IDs. Everything else, on how to setup this in your project and how to have this function in your page, should be addressed in additional question, where you also will need to provide as much information as possible about the Framework you are using, the project setup etc.
So, lets make a simple app.js work with the logic described above:
Since you have Cloud Firestore already working, this means that you already have Google Cloud Platform project (where the Firestore relies) and the proper APIs already enabled. Otherwise it wouldn't be working.
Your guide in this tutorial is the Cloud Firestore: Node.js Client documentation. It will help you to understand all the methods you can use with the Firestore Node.js API. You can find helpful links for adding, reading, querying documents and many more operations. (I will post entire working code later in this steps. I just shared the link so you know where to look for additional features)
Go to Google Cloud Console Dashboard page. You should login with your Google account where your project with the Firestore database is setup.
On top right corner you should see 4 buttons and your profile picture. The first button is the Activate Cloud Shell. This will open a terminal on the bottom of the page with linux OS and Google Cloud SDK already install. There you can interact with your resources within GCP projects and test your code locally before using it in your projects.
After clicking that button, you will notice that the terminal will open in the bottom of your page.
To make sure that you are properly authenticated we will set up the project and authenticate the account again, even if it is already done by default. So first execute $ gcloud auth login
On the prompted question type Y and hit enter
Click on the generated link and authenticate your account on the prompted window
Copy the generated string back to the terminal and hit enter. Now you should be properly authenticated.
Then setup the project that contains Cloud Firestore database with the following command: $ gcloud config set project PROJECT_ID. Now you are ready to build a simple app.js script and execute it.
Create a new app.js file: nano app.js
Inside paste my code example that can be found in this GitHub link. It contains fully working example and many comments explaining each part therefore it is better that it is shared through GitHub link and not pasted here. Without doing any modifications, this code will execute exactly what you are trying to do. I have tested it my self and it is working.
Execute the script as: node app.js
This will give you the following error:
Error: Cannot find module '#google-cloud/firestore'
Since we are importing the library #google-cloud/firestore but haven't installed it yet.
Install #google-cloud/firestore library as follows: $ npm i #google-cloud/firestore. Described in DOC.
Execute the script again: $ node app.js.
You should see e.g. Document with ID: 3 is written.
If you execute again, you should see e.g. Document with ID: 4 is written.
All those changes should appear in your Cloud Firestore database as well. As you can see it is loading the ID of the last document, it is creating a new ID and then it creates a new document with the given arguments, while using the new generated ID as document name. This is exactly what the initial issue was about.
So I have shared with you the full code that works and does exactly what you are trying to do. Unfortunately, the other newly raised issues, should be addressed in another Stackoverflow post, as they have nothing to do with the initial issue, which is "How to create documents with incremental ID". I recommend you to follow the steps and have a working example and then try to implement the logic to your project. However, if you are still facing any issues with how to setup Firestore in your project then you can ask another question. After that you can combine both solutions and you will have working app!
Good luck!
I don't think the way you are trying to get the length of the collection is right and I am entirely not sure what is the best way to get that either. Because the method you are trying to implement will cost you a lot more as you are trying to read all the records of the collection.
But there can be alternatives to get the number you require.
Start storing the ID in the record and make the query with limit 1 and a descending sort on ID.
Store the latest number in another collection and increment that every time you create a new record, And fetch the same whenever needed.
These methods might fail if concurrent requests are being made without transactions.
I need to check (OnLoad) whether an Account has Notes added to it. I've tried doing this using workflows but that only tests after a Note is added rather than if they are already there i.e. On Change, On updating, On status change etc.
Also tried accessing Notes via JavaScript but seems to not be able to reach the attribute. Will paste JScript here if this will help, though that might be the wrong way to go anyway.
function NotesAlert() {
// the 'notestext' field is the Notes description area
var NotesDesc = Xrm.Page.getAttribute("notestext").getValue();
if(NotesDesc !=null) {
Xrm.Page.getAttribute("dt_legacyuserurn").setValue("Notes exist for
this Acc");
}
}
Whether it is client side (JavaScript) or server side (C# plugins, workflows), you have to query the associated notes (annotations) for that particular account record & do the validation.
If you want to validate it in JS, use web api to get the associated notes of account from onLoad & onSave Form events, even onChange of fields can be done like below.
var query = "/api/data/v8.2/annotations?$filter=_objectid_value eq" + accountId;
If you want to validate in Plugins/Workflows (custom), use fetchxml or query expression to query the associated notes of account from Create, Update messages.
I'm using Accounts (accounts-hithub).
Now this is working fine, but now I would like to update the current users.
I've tried things like
Accounts.update({_id: Meteor.user()._id}, {...});
Which gives an error, Accounts doesn't have a method update
So I tried to create a users collection
Users = new Meteor.Collection('users');
This is also not allowed, it gives me the following error:
Error: A method named '/users/insert' is already defined
So how do I update the current user ?
User details are in the Meteor.users collection. So you can edit user details using Meteor.users.update() (http://docs.meteor.com/#meteor_users).
Can I restrict the number of users in a session? Is there any option in vline.session? Please guide if this can be done by writing custom javascript.
EDIT:
Referring to https://vline.com/developer/docs/vline.js/vline.MediaSession#examples, a two party call controller is explained. I want to ask is there any way to restrict number of users in a session? There is no such option present in session's docs. Is it supported as a part of the API?
If this can be done using custom javascript, how?
As a part of my effort, I have tried to implement vline-django examples, but could not find a section in documentation that addresses this issue.
EDIT 2: The code that is working for me.
var vlineClient = (function(){
var client, session,
authToken = {{ user|vline_auth_token|safe }},
serviceId = {% vline_service_id %},
profile = {{ user|vline_user_profile|safe }};
// Create vLine client
window.vlineClient = client = vline.Client.create({"serviceId": serviceId, "ui": true});
// Add login event handler
client.on('login', onLogin);
// Do login
client.login(serviceId, profile, authToken);
function onLogin(event) {
session = event.target;
// Find and init call buttons
var callButtons = document.getElementsByClassName('callbutton');
for (var i=0; i < callButtons.length; ++i) {
initCallButton(callButtons[i]);
}
}
// add event handlers for call button
function initCallButton(button) {
var userId = button.getAttribute('data-userid');
// fetch person object associated with username
session.getPerson(userId).done(function(person) {
// update button state with presence
function onPresenceChange() {
button.setAttribute('data-presence', person.getPresenceState());
}
// set current presence
onPresenceChange();
// handle presence changes
person.on('change:presenceState', onPresenceChange);
// start a call when button is clicked
button.addEventListener('click', function() {
person.startMedia();
});
});
}
return client;
})();
How do I move ahead?
Reference: https://vline.com/developer/docs/vline.js/
if i understand correctly the OP is trying to make a multi-user chat room - this is also what i wanted to do with vline and because i wanted a/v chat as well the number of participants should obviously be capped - it appears that the term 'session' is causing the confusion here so i will refrain from using it
i worked around this by creating a fixed number of users in a db and handling authentication
myself before actually associating a visitor with one of the prepared users - so some javascript logs in each visitor as one of those existing 'anonymous' users and sets only a logged_in? flag in the db so that the next visitor will log in as the next vacant user slot and when all slots are occupied the visitor gets a "chat room full - try again later" response
probably not the most elegant solution - for example the visitor chosen usernames are stored client-side and must be re-assigned to one of the user-definable vline session vars so it can be passed along with each message and the logged_in? db flag needs to be reset when the user exits
note that this was almost a year ago so im a bit foggy on exactly what i did but my app (rails) in up on github if youre interested to fork it - also i should add that although this sort of thing wasnt strictly supported by the vline API at the time there were at least some hints that some analogous feature was being prepared for so there may be some API support for this now - i did notice since then that they have released a "chat room demo" app on github and i would expect that their implementation is more concise than mine so you may want to look at that first - my app tho does have a mostly complete UI with gravatars and collaboration is welcomed