We Keep Coding

JavaScript Function Hoisting in my Object

I have created an object and am attaching a bunch of functions to the object. I am concerned about how the ordering of the functions effects when I can call my functions. In my example below, I must define my functions first before I can use them. My problem with this is that I cannot call init() immediately until I have defined it. Init() will contain a bunch of other functions that it will need to call, which will have to be placed above init(). So in the end, init() will have to be the very last function defined in my object. I believe this is related to Hoisting.
My question is if there is a way for me to call a function before defining it? Is there some sort of way to create a 'placeholder' function like in C?
https://jsfiddle.net/13hdbysh/1/
(function() {
foo = window.foo || {};
//this will not error
foo.helloWorld = function() {
console.log('helloWorld()');
};
foo.helloWorld();
//this will error
foo.init();
foo.init = function() {
console.log('init()');
};
})();

What you're asking deals with how objects store member data. This can be seen in a weird light because of prototypal inheritance. Javascript by default will parse naked functions before they execute.
Example:
(function() {
init();
function init()
{
console.log("Init");
}
)};
This gets muddied when storing behavior as a member to an object. Because prototypal inheritances dynamic functionality you need to declare your members before accessing them. This is Javascript's main difference from traditional OOP languages.
You mentioned, "is there a way to create a 'placeholder' function like in C." You can, but not in the same way. You can assign it to a naked function and assign that to your object. Look in my example, the hello function.
Alternatively you can store the behavior on the prototype of your object and override it when necessary.
Example:
function hello()
{
console.log("Hello my name is "+this.name);
}
(function() {
var something = function(name) {
this.name = name;
};
something.prototype.initTwo = function() {
console.log("My Name is: "+this.name);
};
var thingOne = new something("Thing One");
thingOne.init = "SomeThing";
var thingTwo = new something("Thing Two");
thingTwo.init = function() {
console.log(this.name);
};
thingTwo.initTwo = function() {
console.log("SomethingTwo is Named: "+this.name);
};
thingTwo.hello = hello;
console.log(thingOne.init);
thingTwo.init();
thingOne.initTwo();
thingTwo.initTwo();
thingTwo.hello();
}) ();
Demo: Fiddle
Documentation on objects in javascript.

Try using similar IIFE pattern
(function() {
foo = window.foo || {};
//this will not error
foo.helloWorld = function() {
console.log('helloWorld()');
};
foo.helloWorld();
//this will error
// foo.init();
foo.init = (function _foo() {
console.log('init()');
this.init = _foo;
return this.init
}).call(foo);
foo.init()
})();
jsfiddle https://jsfiddle.net/13hdbysh/2/

I am not sure why would you wanna call it before it is defined but here is how to do it:
foo = window.foo || { init: function() { } };

How about declaring it as a local variable first.
(function() {
foo = window.foo || {};
//this will not error
foo.helloWorld = function() {
console.log('helloWorld()');
};
foo.helloWorld();
var initFunction = function() {
console.log('init()');
};
//this will no longer error
initFunction();
foo.init = initFunction;
})();

Init() will contain a bunch of other functions that it will need to call, which will have to be placed above init().
You are operating under a misapprehension.
A function must be defined before you call it, not before you define another function which will call it later.
Just define all your functions and then start calling them.
(function() {
foo = window.foo || {};
foo.helloWorld = function() {
console.log('helloWorld()');
};
foo.init = function() {
console.log('init()');
};
foo.init();
foo.helloWorld();
})();
As far as hoisting is concerned, function declarations (you only have function expressions) are hoisted, but they create locally scoped variables, not object properties. You would have to assign them to object properties before you could call them as such, and that assignment wouldn't be hoisted.

It's throwing an error because you're calling the method init() before it's declared.
This way will works
foo.init = function() {
console.log('init()');
};
foo.init();

Since foo is an object, you can put those functions into an object so that will be assigned to foo once window.foo is null
(function() {
foo = window.foo || {
helloWorld: function() {
console.log('helloWorld()');
},
init: function() {
console.log('init()');
}
};
//this will not error
foo.helloWorld();
foo.init()
})();

How to call function A from function B within the same namespace?

Let's say I have the namespace,
var Namespace = {
A : function() {
alert('Hello!');
},
B : function() {
// Call A() from here, do other stuff
}
}
In this namespace, I intend for A to be a helper function to B. That is to say, A() will never be called outside the namespace. It will only be called by the functions within the namespace.
What's the best way to address the issue of a local/helper function within a namespace? The way I see it there are two possibilities:
// Method #1
var Namespace = {
A: function() {
alert('Method #1');
},
B : function() {
Namespace.A();
}
}
Namespace.B();
// Method #2
function Namespace2() {
var A = function() {
alert('Method #2');
};
this.B = function() {
A();
}
}
var ns2 = new Namespace2();
ns2.B();
In the first method, it is ugly and awkard to type Namespace.A() (repeatedly) in every function within the namespace. This leads me to prefer Method #2. But I was curious what was the best practice here.

I recommend placing the "namespace" inside a function scope. Everything not explicitly public will be naturally private:
var Namespace = (function() {
var self = {};
// Private
var A = function() {
...
};
// Public
self.B = function() {
A();
}
return self;
}());
Namespace.B(); // Works
Namespace.A(); // Doesn't work

You can call it using this statement
this.A();

Well you can event use a third option where the Namespace is created in it's own scope:
var Namespace = (function(){
var A = function() {
alert('scoped method');
};
function Namespace() {
var A1 = function() {
alert('Namespace "private" method');
};
Namespace.prototype.B1 = function(){
A(); //will run
A1(); //will run with no errors
};
};
Namespace.prototype.B = function(){
A(); //will run
A1(); //ERROR!
};
return Namespace;
})();

If you only intend to use A inside B, why not define it inside B?
var Namespace = {
B: function() {
var A = function() {
...
}
A();
}
};
Namespace.B();

var Namespace = {
A : function() {
alert('Hello!');
},
B : function() {
Namespace.A();
},
}
note the Semi-colon at the end

Why this function is attached to global context

When I use var keyword to declare any variable it gets declared inside the enclosing scope. However in the code below, I have declared function c (inside an object method a.b) with var keyword and still this inside the function c is bound to the global object window. Why is this?
var a = {
b: function () {
var c = function () {
return this;
};
return c();
}
};
document.write(a.b()); //prints: [object Window]

The value of this is determined by context, not scope.
When you call a function without any context (context.func()) as you do there (c()), the default context is the default object (which is window in browsers) unless you are in strict mode (in which case it is undefined instead).
(There are exceptions to this rule, such as apply, call, bind, and new but none of them apply here).

Many people get confused by this. The value this depends on one of 4 methods of invocation.
However, functional invocation and method-invocation cause most of the confusion.
If a function is a member of an object, this is the object itself.
obj.someFunction(); //method invocation
If a function is called without context this is the global object (in 'strict mode' this is undefined.)
someFunction(); //functional invocation
The confusion occurs when a function is called within an object, but not as a member of the object as in anObject.testWithHelper(..);
var testForThis = function(isThis, message) {
//this can be confusing
if(this === isThis)
console.log("this is " + message);
else
console.log("this is NOT " + message);
};
//functional invocation
testForThis(this, "global"); //this is global
var anObject = {
test: testForThis, //I am a method
testWithHelper: function(isThis, message) {
//functional invocation
testForThis(isThis, message + " from helper");
}
};
//method invocation
anObject.test(anObject, "anObject"); //this is anObject
//method invocation followed by functional invocation
anObject.testWithHelper(anObject, "an object"); //this is NOT anObject from helper
Here is my JSFIDDLE
If you would like c to return a, you can use closure:
var a = {
b: function () {
var that = this;
var c = function () {
return that;
};
return c();
}
};
Or avoid this all together:
var getNewA = function() {
var newA = {};
newA.b = function() {
var c = function() {
return newA;
};
return c();
};
return newA;
};
var newA = getNewA();

How can I access "this" from within a JavaScript module?

I'm trying to understand how to best use the JavaScript module pattern. My problem is that it seems there's no way to refer to the module from within itself, because this is set to the Window object.
I've got this simple test code:
var Test = function() {
var that = this;
return {
something: function() {
console.info(that);
}
}
}
var test1 = Test();
test1.something();
var test2 = Test();
test2.something();
Both test1 and test2 print a reference to the Window object instead of the module itself.
Any idea how to change it so that I have a valid this inside the module?

If you did
var test1 = new Test()
You could then do
test1.something();
An alternative module structure would be to do something like this:
var myModule = function () {
var obj = {};
obj.something = function () {
return console.log(obj);
};
obj.something2 = function () {
return console.log(obj === this); // true
};
return obj;
};
var test = myModule();
test.something();
test.something2();
Hope this helps

I think you're confusing the JavaScript module pattern with JavaScript constructor functions.
JavaScript constructor functions
If you write a function and call it with the new keyword in front of it, then that function is called as a constructor function.
It will automatically return a new object, that you can refer to within the constructor function using the this keyword.
var Test = function() {
var that = this;
this.something = function () {
console.info(that);
console.info(this);
};
}
var test1 = new Test();
test1.something();
You can return your own object instead, but you wouldn't normally do that in a constructor, you'd just use this instead:
var Test = function() {
var that = this;
return {
something: function () {
console.info(that);
console.info(this);
}
};
}
var test1 = new Test();
test1.something();
If you don't call it with the new keyword in front of it, then it's called like a regular function, meaning any references to this inside of it refer to the object of which the function is a property (which, in the absence of anything else, will be the global object, which in web browsers is window).
var geoff = {
Test: function () {
var that = this;
return {
something: function () {
console.info(that);
}
};
}
};
var test2 = geoff.Test();
var test3 = Test();
Note: with constructor functions, you'd normally define methods on their prototype object, so that the methods don't get unnecessarily redefined for each object you create using the constructor function:
var Test = function() {
this.else = "Something Else"
}
Test.prototype.something = function () {
console.info(this);
}
Test.prototype.somethingElse = function () {
console.info(this.else);
}
var test4 = new Test();
test1.somethingElse() // Logs "Something Else"
(Note that if you return your own object from the constructor function as we mentioned above, then you won't be able to access methods on the prototype object any more.)
Also note that each time you call a constructor function, it returns a new object. You can pass parameters into a constructor function (just like you can with any other function) and use them to customise the object returned:
var Test = function(else) {
this.else = else;
}
Test.prototype.somethingElse = function () {
console.info(this.else);
}
var test1 = new Test("Something else");
var test2 = new Test("Something else again");
test1.somethingElse(); // Logs "Something else"
test2.somethingElse(); // Logs "Something else again"

The problem you have is because this refers to an object, but Test() isn't an object; it's just a function. The object that owns Test() is the Window object (because Test is in the global scope), so therefore that's what you get back when you reference this from within Test().
You may want to try something like this:
var testObj = {
Test : function() {
var that = this;
return {
something: function() {
console.info(that);
}
}
}
}
Now you can call testObj.Test(); and you'll get a reference back to the testObj object.
Hope that clarifies things a bit.

Calling method inside another method in javascript?

I am having a JavaScript namespace say
A={
CA: function() {
this.B();
},
B: function() {
var test='test';
var result='t1';
C: function() {
this.test='test1';
.....
.....
return 'test1';
}
result=this.C();
return result;
}
}
Now when I am executing such code it is giving that TypeError: this.C is not a function. Can somebody tell me why it is so. I know it is something related with lexical scoping but am unable to understand this.

You have to be careful when you use this to identify anything in Javascript because each time you change scope "this" changes.
Assigning the 'this' reference to it's own variable helps get around this.
var a = new function() {
var self = this;
self.method = function() { alert('hiya'); };
var b = function() {
this.method(); // this isn't 'a' anymore?
self.method(); // but 'self' is still referring to 'a'
};
};

I think the problem is that when this.C() is executed inside the function referred to by B, this refers to the object that contains B, that is, object A. (This assumes B() is called within the context of A)
The problem is, C does not exist on the object A, since it's defined within B. If you want to call a local function C() within B, just use C().
EDIT:
Also, I'm not sure what you've posted is valid JavaScript. Specifically, B should be defined this way, since you can't use the object:property syntax within a function.
B: function()
{
var test='test';
var result='t1';
var C = function()
{
this.test='test1';
return 'test1';
}
result=C();
return result;
}

I am actually surprised that your code doesn't give you error on the 'C:' line.
Anyway, your syntax to define a function is not correct. Define it using the var keyword. Also, notice that I created the 'closure' so that the function C can access 'this'. See the code below:
A={
CA: function()
{
this.B();
},
B: function()
{
var test='test';
var result='t1';
var self = this;
var C = function()
{
self.test='test1';
.....
.....
return 'test1';
}
result=C();
return result;
}
}
If you want to assign C to 'this' object, you can also do:
A={
CA: function()
{
this.B();
},
B: function()
{
var test='test';
var result='t1';
var self = this;
this.C = function()
{
self.test='test1';
.....
.....
return 'test1';
};
result= this.C();
return result;
}
}

Solution for calling methods from another method. (Essentially the pointer "this" must be assigned to a variable and the new variable used in place of this.)
function myfunction(){
var me = this;
me.method1 = function(msg){ alert(msg); }
me.method2 = function(){
me.method1("method1 called from method2");
}
}
var f as new myfunction();
f.method2();
This example shows how one can call a method from within another method or from outside using an instance of the function.