I have a problem with fieldsets show and hide functions.
In my app at the left side I have a combobox with change listener. At the right side I have several different textfields which are showing and hiding according as chosen value in combobox.
Every hide and show functions are working with fieldsets, but if I can't to show/hide fieldset. Fieldset reference is visible, I can list this component with console.log() function.
Here's a piece of my code:
var rigthPanelLeftContainer = {
flex: 1,
minWidth: 200,
defaults: {
xtype: 'textfield',
minWidth: 180,
anchor: '100%'
},
items: [
//some working textfields here
{
xtype: 'fieldset',
labelWidth: 160,
anchor: '100%',
height: 40,
itemId: 'remarkId',
title: 'title'],
hidden : !ifHideIt, //boolean
items: [{
xtype: 'text',
height: 25,
text: 'sometext']
}]
}
]};
var comboBoxConnectors = {
xtype: 'combobox',
fieldLabel: Ext.translations.map['field.label.common'],
store: Ext.state.Manager.get('conTypes'),
editable: false,
queryMode: 'local',
name: 'conType',
itemId: 'conTypeField',
value: connObj === null ? conTypes[0] : connObj.type,
labelWidth: 160,
anchor: '100%',
listeners: {
change: function(obj, newValue, oldValue) {
//many hide/show working on textfield functions
var remarkId = me.query('#remarkId');
console.log(remarkId); //returns my fieldset element
remarkId.hide(); //returns remarkId.hide is not a function
}
}
}
I really need your help guys, whats wrong with this?
In your code, you have a comment that says that me.query( '#remarkId' ) returns your fieldset element. This is not technically correct. Assuming that me.query() is a component query, what you are actually getting in return is an array of matched components. So then, you're getting the undefined function error because, most definitely, an array does not have a hide() method. If you access the first element in the array and then call the hide() method, it should work.
However, you should probably also consider going about this a bit differently. Instead of getting an array of elements with query() (which may always be one, but not necessarily...), you could use the built in traversal methods to find the correct component. For example, assuming that the combobox and the fieldset are both children of the same form panel, you could do something like this: mycombobox.up( 'form' ).down( 'fieldset#remarkId' ). This basically instructs the code to traverse up the component hierarchy to the nearest form, then to drill down to the first descendant of the form that is a fieldset with the itemId of "remarkId". This will only ever give you a single component as a result, so you don't have to bother with accessing a component out of an array of components.
Related
This is a follow up question that I got answered here: How can I programmatically set column filters?
I have a 188 line Ext.js view. In this view I extend Ext.grid.Panel and in this grid I have set the selModel like so ...
selModel: {
cellSelect: false, // Only support row selection.
type: 'spreadsheet' // Use the new "spreadsheet" style grid selection model.
},
On one of the columns, the Status column, I am programmatically setting the filter so that only rows that have the Status of Ready will appear when the page firsts renders. I have been doing this here in the code:
columns: [
...
{
text: 'Status',
dataIndex: 'status',
itemId: 'status',
renderer: function(value, metaData) {
var filter = this.up('panel').down('#status').filter;
if (!filter.menu) {
filter.createMenu();
filter.menu
.down('menuitem[value="Ready"]')
.setChecked(true);
}
metaData.tdStyle = (value == 'Ready') ?
'color:green;font-weight: bold' :
'color:red;font-style: italic'
return(value)
},
filter: 'list',
flex: 1,
},
... more columns ...
A helpful SO member pointed out that is not the most efficient place for the code that sets the filter as the code will be executed for each row in the grid.
I have tried adding an afterrender function like so ...
{
text: 'Status',
dataIndex: 'status',
itemId: 'status',
renderer: function(value, metaData) {
metaData.tdStyle = (value == 'Ready') ?
'color:green;font-weight: bold' :
'color:red;font-style: italic'
return(value)
},
filter: 'list',
flex: 1,
listeners: {
afterrender: function(value) {
Ext.Msg.alert('We have been rendered value is ' + value );
var filter = this.up('panel').down('#status').filter;
if (!filter.menu) {
filter.createMenu();
filter.menu
.down('menuitem[value="Ready"]')
.setChecked(true); //Uncaught TypeError: Cannot read property 'setChecked' of null
}
}},
... but that results in this error message, //Uncaught TypeError: Cannot read property 'setChecked' of null.
What am I doing wrong here? Do I need the listeners:? Am I not getting passed the data I think I am getting passed to my afterrender function? Should I defining a initComponent function?
UPDATE:
I changed my code to what DrakeES suggested, ...
{
text: 'Status',
dataIndex: 'status',
itemId: 'status',
renderer: function(value, metaData) {
metaData.tdStyle = (value == 'Ready') ?
'color:green;font-weight: bold' :
'color:red;font-style: italic'
return(value)
},
flex: 1,
filter: {
type: 'list',
value: 'Ready'
}
... but the result is this:
Where the animated loading image just sits there and spins. This prevents the user from be able to change the filter interactively. I wonder what it is I am doing wrong here?
I am programmatically setting the filter so that only rows that have
the Status of Ready will appear when the page firsts renders
What checking the filter's checkbox effectively does is setting filter on the store. Because you want the filter to be applied initially, it would be better to have it in the store config right away:
filters: [
{
id: 'x-gridfilter-status',
property: 'status',
value: 'Ready'
}
]
That way the grid view appear filtered in the first place — instead of initially showing all rows and only then filtering them out once the column menu renders and applies the filter. Note that having id: 'x-gridfilter-status' on the store's filter is required so that the column's filter picks it up instead of creating a duplicate.
Setting filter on the store, however, will not send feedback to the column filter menu, so the latter will remain unchecked unless you explicitly check it. Therefore, you still need an afterrender handler on either the grid or the column to make things look in sync.
A simple and elegant solution without listeners and stuff:
filter: {
type: 'list',
value: 'Ready'
}
Full working example: https://fiddle.sencha.com/#fiddle/prp
Disclaimer: I am relatively new to ExtJS (version 5.01). I am hoping to reach some ExtJS experts to point me in the right direction:
I am getting an error when specifying an initComponent method within an items config. The code below generates the error:
"Uncaught TypeError: Cannot read property 'items' of undefined"
The error disappears when the 'initComponent' function of the north-child panel is commented out. I have the feeling I missed something on initialization order.
Q: How can I specify an initComponent method of a child item within the items configuration?
Ext.define('MyApp.view.TestView', {
extend: 'Ext.panel.Panel',
title: 'Parent',
height: 300,
layout: 'border',
items: [{
xtype: 'panel',
region: 'north',
title: 'North Child',
/* Problematic function: If commented, it works */
initComponent: function(){
console.log("test north child");
this.callParent(arguments);
}
}],
initComponent: function(){
console.log("Test parent");
this.callParent(arguments);
}
});
Short answer: You can't define initComponent on a child, because you can't do anything there that can't be done anywhere else.
InitComponent is executed when an instance of the component 'MyApp.view.TestView' is created (you only defined it here, using Ext.define). It can be created using Ext.create('MyApp.view.TestView',{, or by creating another view that has this component added as an item, or by deriving another component (extend:'MyApp.view.TestView').
All the child components are also created when 'MyApp.view.TestView' is created, so the initComponent function on the child would be superfluous, because the child cannot be created without the parent, so the initComponent of the parent can be used for everything that you want to do in the child's initComponent.
If you need sth. to be calculated before the items can be addded, you would proceed as follows:
Ext.define('MyApp.view.TestView', {
extend: 'Ext.panel.Panel',
title: 'Parent',
height: 300,
layout: 'border',
initComponent: function(){
var me = this,
tf = Ext.getCmp("someTextField"),
myTitle = (tf?tf.getValue():'');
Ext.applyIf(me,{
items: [{
xtype: 'panel',
region: 'north',
title: myTitle,
}]
});
this.callParent(arguments);
}
});
Please refer to the docs what exactly Ext.applyIf does (and how it differs from Ext.apply, because that function also comes handy sometimes).
I working on a kendo ui grid. The grid is not-editable as default.
In the toolbar is a 'edit' button. When the user clicks on it, the grid should be editable in batch mode like this.
The only solution to get this work is remove and recreate the grid/datasource with new properties (editable:true etc).
This works as expected. Now I want to set the focus on the first row/cell, so that the user can see that the grid is editable now (in the example below the row becomes an input field).
Any suggestions for this?
Here is a fiddle for this.
$('.k-grid-edit').on('click', function (e) {
e.preventDefault();
// remove old grid
$('#grid').html('');
// recreate grid with edit: true and new datasource
$('#grid').kendoGrid({
dataSource: dataSourceInEdit,
editable: true,
columns: [{
field: 'TableId',
title: 'Id',
width: 50
}, {
field: 'Area',
title: 'Area'
}, {
field: 'Table',
title: 'Table',
width: 60
}, {
command: 'destroy',
title: ' ',
width: 100
}]
}).data("kendoGrid");
}); // end edit
Okay, I got it:
These 2 lines make it happen:
var grid = $("#rt_tableGrid").data("kendoGrid");
grid.editRow($("#rt_tableGrid tr:eq(1)"));
Certainly only on my local script, in the Fiddle I cant´t get it to work.
Although in the Docu is written: Requires "inline" or "popup"
Documentation here
I am trying to get value of this checkbox
Ext.define('myRoot.myExtApp.myForm', {
extend: 'Ext.form.Panel',
layout: {
type: 'vbox',
align: 'stretch'
},
scope: this,
constructor: function() {
this.callParent(arguments);
this.myFieldSet = Ext.create('Ext.form.FieldSet', {
scope: this,
columnWidth: 0.5,
collapsible: false,
defaultType: 'textfield',
layout: {
type: 'hbox', align: 'stretch'
}
});
this.mySecondForm = Ext.create('myRoot.myExtApp.myForm2', {
scope: this,
listener: this,
margin: '1 3 0 0'
});
this.myCheckBox = Ext.create('Ext.form.Checkbox', {
scope: this,
//id: 'myCheckBox',
boxLabel: 'Active',
name: 'Active',
checked: true,
horizontal: true
});
this.myFieldSet.add(this.mySecondForm);
this.myFieldSet.add(this.myCheckBox);
this.add(this.myFieldSet);
}
});
As you can see I have another form
Ext.define('myRoot.myExtApp.myForm2', {
where I have a handler, that should get the value of the checkbox from "myForm"
How can I get the value of my checkbox from Form2 without using Ext.getCmp? I know I can get the value of the checkbox if I do
Ext.getCmp('myCheckBox').getValue();
but using
this.myCheckBox.getValue();
gives me undefined error.
UPDATE - with Wared suggestion I tried this inside myForm2
this.temp=Ext.create('myRoot.myExtApp.myForm'), {});
var tempV = this.temp.myCheckBox.getValue();
I was able to get the value but I get the same true value even if I uncheck the box
I assume you worry about performance loss due to excessive use of component queries. A nice trick to minimize component queries could be to define a new method inside a closure in order to cache the result of the first getCmp call. Wrapping the definition of the method inside a closure allows to avoid using global scope or a useless class property.
getMyCmp: function (cmp) {
// "cmp" does not exist outside this function
return function () {
return cmp = cmp || Ext.getCmp('#myCmp');
};
}()
One solution could be :
myRoot.myExtApp.myForm.myCheckBox.getValue();
Beware, wrong answer. See comments below for a valid solution.
I need specific IDs on ExtJS generated window buttons, but I'm having trouble specifying the ID. The documentation claims that this should be possible, but I still get an autogenerated id when I specify my own.
What gives?
dialog = new Ext.Window({
closeAction:'hide',
plain: true,
buttons: [
{
id: 'my-dialog',
text: 'Done',
handler: function() {
dialog.hide();
}
}
],
items:new Ext.Panel({
applyTo:'add-document-popup-panel'
}),
title: 'Add Documents',
layout: 'fit',
resizable: false,
draggable: false,
width: 300,
height: 300,
modal: true
});
}
dialog.show(this);
Check this topic: http://www.sencha.com/forum/showthread.php?24433-CLOSED-Cannot-assign-id-to-button-extjs-bug
The id of the container of the button is set, not the HTML button itself.
The id you specify is assigned to the button component (specific to extjs) and not necessarily to the underlying html button.
Does Ext.getCmp('my-dialog') successfully return the extjs button component?
The ID is set, but not on the actual button element. One of the containers is set with the correct id, and you can probably key off of this to get at whatever you need.
I had the same problem and I confirm:
The ID is set in the button's TABLE container.
Ext.getCmp('my-button') returns the extjs button component (object with xtype="button" and id="my-button").