I need specific IDs on ExtJS generated window buttons, but I'm having trouble specifying the ID. The documentation claims that this should be possible, but I still get an autogenerated id when I specify my own.
What gives?
dialog = new Ext.Window({
closeAction:'hide',
plain: true,
buttons: [
{
id: 'my-dialog',
text: 'Done',
handler: function() {
dialog.hide();
}
}
],
items:new Ext.Panel({
applyTo:'add-document-popup-panel'
}),
title: 'Add Documents',
layout: 'fit',
resizable: false,
draggable: false,
width: 300,
height: 300,
modal: true
});
}
dialog.show(this);
Check this topic: http://www.sencha.com/forum/showthread.php?24433-CLOSED-Cannot-assign-id-to-button-extjs-bug
The id of the container of the button is set, not the HTML button itself.
The id you specify is assigned to the button component (specific to extjs) and not necessarily to the underlying html button.
Does Ext.getCmp('my-dialog') successfully return the extjs button component?
The ID is set, but not on the actual button element. One of the containers is set with the correct id, and you can probably key off of this to get at whatever you need.
I had the same problem and I confirm:
The ID is set in the button's TABLE container.
Ext.getCmp('my-button') returns the extjs button component (object with xtype="button" and id="my-button").
Related
I have a problem with fieldsets show and hide functions.
In my app at the left side I have a combobox with change listener. At the right side I have several different textfields which are showing and hiding according as chosen value in combobox.
Every hide and show functions are working with fieldsets, but if I can't to show/hide fieldset. Fieldset reference is visible, I can list this component with console.log() function.
Here's a piece of my code:
var rigthPanelLeftContainer = {
flex: 1,
minWidth: 200,
defaults: {
xtype: 'textfield',
minWidth: 180,
anchor: '100%'
},
items: [
//some working textfields here
{
xtype: 'fieldset',
labelWidth: 160,
anchor: '100%',
height: 40,
itemId: 'remarkId',
title: 'title'],
hidden : !ifHideIt, //boolean
items: [{
xtype: 'text',
height: 25,
text: 'sometext']
}]
}
]};
var comboBoxConnectors = {
xtype: 'combobox',
fieldLabel: Ext.translations.map['field.label.common'],
store: Ext.state.Manager.get('conTypes'),
editable: false,
queryMode: 'local',
name: 'conType',
itemId: 'conTypeField',
value: connObj === null ? conTypes[0] : connObj.type,
labelWidth: 160,
anchor: '100%',
listeners: {
change: function(obj, newValue, oldValue) {
//many hide/show working on textfield functions
var remarkId = me.query('#remarkId');
console.log(remarkId); //returns my fieldset element
remarkId.hide(); //returns remarkId.hide is not a function
}
}
}
I really need your help guys, whats wrong with this?
In your code, you have a comment that says that me.query( '#remarkId' ) returns your fieldset element. This is not technically correct. Assuming that me.query() is a component query, what you are actually getting in return is an array of matched components. So then, you're getting the undefined function error because, most definitely, an array does not have a hide() method. If you access the first element in the array and then call the hide() method, it should work.
However, you should probably also consider going about this a bit differently. Instead of getting an array of elements with query() (which may always be one, but not necessarily...), you could use the built in traversal methods to find the correct component. For example, assuming that the combobox and the fieldset are both children of the same form panel, you could do something like this: mycombobox.up( 'form' ).down( 'fieldset#remarkId' ). This basically instructs the code to traverse up the component hierarchy to the nearest form, then to drill down to the first descendant of the form that is a fieldset with the itemId of "remarkId". This will only ever give you a single component as a result, so you don't have to bother with accessing a component out of an array of components.
I working on a kendo ui grid. The grid is not-editable as default.
In the toolbar is a 'edit' button. When the user clicks on it, the grid should be editable in batch mode like this.
The only solution to get this work is remove and recreate the grid/datasource with new properties (editable:true etc).
This works as expected. Now I want to set the focus on the first row/cell, so that the user can see that the grid is editable now (in the example below the row becomes an input field).
Any suggestions for this?
Here is a fiddle for this.
$('.k-grid-edit').on('click', function (e) {
e.preventDefault();
// remove old grid
$('#grid').html('');
// recreate grid with edit: true and new datasource
$('#grid').kendoGrid({
dataSource: dataSourceInEdit,
editable: true,
columns: [{
field: 'TableId',
title: 'Id',
width: 50
}, {
field: 'Area',
title: 'Area'
}, {
field: 'Table',
title: 'Table',
width: 60
}, {
command: 'destroy',
title: ' ',
width: 100
}]
}).data("kendoGrid");
}); // end edit
Okay, I got it:
These 2 lines make it happen:
var grid = $("#rt_tableGrid").data("kendoGrid");
grid.editRow($("#rt_tableGrid tr:eq(1)"));
Certainly only on my local script, in the Fiddle I cant´t get it to work.
Although in the Docu is written: Requires "inline" or "popup"
Documentation here
I have the following code which creates a tab inside of a tabpanel:
id: 'tabs',
region: 'center',
xtype: 'tabpanel',
autoDestroy: false,
items:[{
xtype: 'country-rate-grid',
id: 'LegalCompliance',
title: 'Legal Compliance',
store: 'RateManagement.store.LegalRateStore',
hidden: true,
closable: true,
listeners: {
'close': function(tab, eOpts) {
tab.hide();
}
}
}
When I close the tab via the X button, and then try to re-open it via tabs.child('#'+record.data.id).tab.show();, I get this error in the console:
Uncaught TypeError: Cannot read property 'tab' of null
It looks like it is deleting the tab instead of hiding it. How can I just show and hide my tabs instead of deleting them from the DOM when someone clicks the close button on the tab?
Quoting Ext JS 4.2.2 docs:
Note: By default, a tab's close tool destroys the child tab Component and all its descendants. This makes the child tab Component, and all its descendants unusable. To enable re-use of a tab, configure the TabPanel with autoDestroy: false.
EDIT: Ok, now I think I get what you're trying to do and where it went wrong. I've looked up the code and it looks like autoDestroy: false does not in fact destroy a container's child, but it detaches that child from the document body and removes it from the container's children collection. That's why you're seeing it disappearing from the DOM. The DOM nodes are not lost however, and are appended to the detached body element that is available through Ext.getDetachedBody(). That's also why you can't refer to the component by calling tabs.child(blah) - the tab has been removed from there.
So if you're trying to kind of hide a tab panel upon closing, to be able to show it again, you'd have to re-insert it back into the tab panel:
Ext.onReady(function() {
var tabs = Ext.create('Ext.tab.Panel', {
renderTo: document.body,
width: 300,
height: 200,
autoDestroy: false,
items: [{
id: 'foo',
title: 'Foo',
closable: true,
html: 'foo bar'
}, {
id: 'bar',
title: 'bar',
closable: false,
items: [{
xtype: 'button',
text: 'Bring foo back!',
handler: function() {
var foo = Ext.getCmp('foo');
foo.ensureAttachedToBody();
tabs.insert(foo);
}
}]
}]
});
});
foo.ensureAttachedToBody() will re-attach the DOM nodes for that panel back to the document body, and then we insert it into the tab panel as if nothing had happened. Voila.
New StaticDataSource will construct datasource for fuelux grid. The formatter will set the property to generate editable button in datagrid cell. The code is as follows:
app.PlayersView = Backbone.View.extend({
template: _.template( $("#players-template").html() ),
events: {
"click #addUser" : "addUser",
},
initialize: function () {
if(this.collection){
this.collection.fetch();
}
this.listenTo(this.collection, 'all', this.render);
},
render: function () {
this.$el.html( this.template );
var dataSource = new StaticDataSource({
columns: [
{
property: 'username',
label: 'Username',
sortable: true
},
{
property: 'group',
label: 'Groups',
sortable: true
},
{
property: 'edit',
label: 'Edit',
sortable: true
}
],
formatter: function (items) {
$.each(items, function (index, item) {
item.edit = '<div class="btn-group"><a id="editGroup" class="btn">Edit</a></div>';
});
},
data: this.collection.toJSON(),
delay: 250
});
$('#MyGrid').datagrid({
dataSource: dataSource,
stretchHeight: true
});
});
The app.Playerview object is created somewhere in bakcbone router as follows:
new app.PlayersView({
collection : new app.UsersCollection
}));
Here, column are username, groups and edit. The edit column for each row contains edit button. When I click the edit button in any row, I want to pass the particular row modal or row data to any other backbone view. How can we do that?
Actualy I will open the dialog that will allow to edit that particular row. I want modal to be pre-populated by that row value.
Thanks in advance
From a Backbone point of view you have no control whatsoever on your grid. So basically, at the moment, your rows don't represent any model.
As things are now, if you only want to pre-populate your modal, I guess you could do it easily with jQuery.
However I'll assume you also want your models to be changed at the same time. I don't know Fuel UX so I don't know exactly how you could do this but (but I'm still pretty sure you can, and should if you want your models to be updated): wait until the grid is created, bind your models to the grid by creating a view which element would be the row for each, and inside this view listen to clicks on your button. Here you would have direct access to your model, and therefore your data.
If you'd post some more code (the definition of your model for example) and the HTML of the grid (or a simplified version as I'm sure it's full of custom classes and so on), I could help if you wish so.
If your players have unique identifiers you can change your edit buttons as follows, to include a player ID:
Before:
<a id="editGroup" class="btn">Edit</a>
After:
<a id="editGroup" data-id="3" class="btn">Edit</a>
Of course, you would plug in the correct ID inside your existing formatter function. You would then have access to this ID from the click event in order to populate your dialog and choose the correct model to update.
I'm loading a jqGrid on my page. The grid has a Delete button for each row. I'm trying to use the jquery UI dialog confirmation on my Delete button.
Here's my javascript code:
<script type="text/javascript">
$(document).ready(function () {
$("#list").jqGrid({
url: '/MyController/MyFunction/',
datatype: 'json',
mtype: 'POST',
colNames: ['', 'Name', ''],
colModel: [
{ name: 'Edit', index: 'Edit', width: 40, align: 'left', sortable: false },
{ name: 'Name', index: 'Name', width: 120, align: 'left' },
{ name: 'Delete', index: 'Delete', width: 50, align: 'left', sortable: false }],
pager: $('#pager'),
rowNum: 10,
rowList: [10, 20, 50],
sortname: 'Name',
sortorder: "asc",
viewrecords: true,
width: 700
});
$("#dialog-confirm").dialog({
autoOpen: false,
modal: true,
buttons: {
"Delete": function () {
window.location.href = $(this).attr("href"); ;
},
Cancel: function () {
$(this).dialog("close");
}
}
});
$("a.confirm").click(function () {
alert("HELLO");
//$("#dialog-confirm").dialog("open");
});
});
</script>
I'm passing in data from my controller to the grid. I have the class "confirm" added to the Delete link for each row.
If I click on my Delete button, nothing happens. The link has the correct class, and all my javascript is loading correctly. I placed an alert at the end of my document.ready function to make sure there were no errors.
But if I comment out my jqGrid and add a link onto my page with the class "confirm", the click event will fire.
Has anyone ever run into this?
The main problem which you have is that you try to make 'click' binding with $("a.confirm").click(...) before the elements "a.confirm" are loaded.
You should either place the binding code inside of loadComplete or gridComplete event handler or use jQuery.live
$("a.confirm").live('click', function() {
alert("HELLO");
//$("#dialog-confirm").dialog("open");
});
instead of $("a.confirm").click(...).
One more general remark. The best practice working with jqGrid is dividing data from the HTML markup. I suppose that you place HTML fragment with <a class="confirm">...</a> inside of JSON data returned from the server. jqGrid supports another ways to archive the same results. You can 1) use showlink formatter; 2) use custom formatter which allow create any HTML fragment for the grid cell based on the row of data (see rowObject parameter) returned from the server 3) use unobtrusive JavaScript (see my answer with the code example) 4) any mix from both (see another answer with the code example). The way 3 seems me mostly close to what you do.
In any way having clear separation of JSON data from HTML markup is good not only because of design reason. It allows additionally reduce the size of data send from server. (see this answer for more information)