Meteor Npm.require() cannot find a file in parent directory - javascript

I'm trying to get an abandoned nodejs library to work under Meteor.
Why does Npm.require('./crypto-js/crypto') work fine, but Npm.require('../convert') is throwing the error Error: Cannot find module '../convert'?
/packages/myPackage/package.js
Package.on_use(function (api) {
var path = Npm.require('path');
api.add_files(path.join('convert.js'), 'server');
api.add_files(path.join('crypto-js', 'crypto.js'), 'server');
api.add_files(path.join('util.js'), 'server');
});
/packages/myPackage/convert.js
myFunc = function() {
return true
}
/packages/myPackage/util.js
Crypto = Npm.require('./crypto-js/crypto');
/packages/myPackage/crypto-js/crypto.js
var conv = Npm.require('../convert')

Already answered to this on IRC but posting here for the reference.
The author wanted to use a fork of npm module hosted on GitHub. To import the npm module from certain repo and certain commit, we can use GitHub's tarball url.
Create a smart package in /packages/package-name
In /packages/package-name/package.js describe the package, add files, export variables
add Npm.depends to package.js file looking like this:
Npm.depends({'NPM-MODULE-NAME': "https://github.com/REPOAUTHOR/REPONAME/tarball/COMMIT-SHA1"});
in one of the smart package's files do ExportSymbol = Npm.require('NPM-MODULE-NAME')
export the export symbol
example: https://github.com/Slava/meteor-npm-fork-example

Related

Node Js, Require is not defined in global folder

I have a node.js server to create a web chat application. But I have a problem. In one file, I want to get a function from another file with the require method and module.export. In my first file (server.js, which is in the root path), the require method works, but in the /js folder (which is not in the root), it does not work. I installed npm and all packages globally.
My All File :
Code in chat.js:
const {verifUserConnected, getUserInfo} = require('express');
console.log(verifUserConnected)
Code in connect.js :
function verifUserConnected(){
return isConnected;
}
function getUserInfo(){
return null;
}
module.exports = {
verifUserConnected,
getUserInfo
};
In "Server.js" The require method works
You've put connect.js in underneath a folder named "public" which implies you are serving it to the browser and trying to run it client-side.
Browsers do not have native support for CommonJS modules (i.e. module.exports and require).
Your starting options are:
Rewrite the client-side code to not use modules
Rewrite the client-side code to use JavaScript modules (i.e. using import, export and <script type="module").
Transpile the modules for use on the browser (e.g. using a tool like Webpack or Parcel.js
However … chat.js attempts to require('express'). Express will not run in the browser and doesn't export anything named verifUserConnected either. You'll need to address that too.
In Common JS (Node JS works by default eith Common JS)
const startServer = () => {
// Code
};
module.exports = { startServer }
//Or
exports.startServer = startServer;
To import.
const { startServer } = require("./path");
If you have any question ask me

Renaming file by using Node Package Version [duplicate]

Is there a way to get the version set in package.json in a nodejs app? I would want something like this
var port = process.env.PORT || 3000
app.listen port
console.log "Express server listening on port %d in %s mode %s", app.address().port, app.settings.env, app.VERSION
I found that the following code fragment worked best for me. Since it uses require to load the package.json, it works regardless of the current working directory.
var pjson = require('./package.json');
console.log(pjson.version);
A warning, courtesy of #Pathogen:
Doing this with Browserify has security implications.
Be careful not to expose your package.json to the client, as it means that all your dependency version numbers, build and test commands and more are sent to the client.
If you're building server and client in the same project, you expose your server-side version numbers too.
Such specific data can be used by an attacker to better fit the attack on your server.
If your application is launched with npm start, you can simply use:
process.env.npm_package_version
See package.json vars for more details.
Using ES6 modules you can do the following:
import {version} from './package.json';
Or in plain old shell:
$ node -e "console.log(require('./package.json').version);"
This can be shortened to
$ node -p "require('./package.json').version"
There are two ways of retrieving the version:
Requiring package.json and getting the version:
const { version } = require('./package.json');
Using the environment variables:
const version = process.env.npm_package_version;
Please don't use JSON.parse, fs.readFile, fs.readFileSync and don't use another npm modules it's not necessary for this question.
For those who look for a safe client-side solution that also works on server-side, there is genversion. It is a command-line tool that reads the version from the nearest package.json and generates an importable CommonJS module file that exports the version. Disclaimer: I'm a maintainer.
$ genversion lib/version.js
I acknowledge the client-side safety was not OP's primary intention, but as discussed in answers by Mark Wallace and aug, it is highly relevant and also the reason I found this Q&A.
Here is how to read the version out of package.json:
fs = require('fs')
json = JSON.parse(fs.readFileSync('package.json', 'utf8'))
version = json.version
EDIT: Wow, this answer was originally from 2012! There are several better answers now. Probably the cleanest is:
const { version } = require('./package.json');
There is another way of fetching certain information from your package.json file namely using pkginfo module.
Usage of this module is very simple. You can get all package variables using:
require('pkginfo')(module);
Or only certain details (version in this case)
require('pkginfo')(module, 'version');
And your package variables will be set to module.exports (so version number will be accessible via module.exports.version).
You could use the following code snippet:
require('pkginfo')(module, 'version');
console.log "Express server listening on port %d in %s mode %s", app.address().port, app.settings.env, module.exports.version
This module has very nice feature - it can be used in any file in your project (e.g. in subfolders) and it will automatically fetch information from your package.json. So you do not have to worry where you package.json is.
I hope that will help.
NPM one liner:
From npm v7.20.0:
npm pkg get version
Prior to npm v7.20.0:
npm -s run env echo '$npm_package_version'
Note the output is slightly different between these two methods: the former outputs the version number surrounded by quotes (i.e. "1.0.0"), the latter without (i.e. 1.0.0).
One solution to remove the quotes in Unix is using xargs
npm pkg get version | xargs echo
Option 1
Best practice is to version from package.json using npm environment variables.
process.env.npm_package_version
more information on: https://docs.npmjs.com/using-npm/config.html
This will work only when you start your service using NPM command.
Quick Info: you can read any values in pacakge.json using process.env.npm_package_[keyname]
Option 2
Setting version in environment variable using https://www.npmjs.com/package/dotenv as .env file and reading it as process.env.version
Just adding an answer because I came to this question to see the best way to include the version from package.json in my web application.
I know this question is targetted for Node.js however, if you are using Webpack to bundle your app just a reminder the recommended way is to use the DefinePlugin to declare a global version in the config and reference that. So you could do in your webpack.config.json
const pkg = require('../../package.json');
...
plugins : [
new webpack.DefinePlugin({
AppVersion: JSON.stringify(pkg.version),
...
And then AppVersion is now a global that is available for you to use. Also make sure in your .eslintrc you ignore this via the globals prop
If you are looking for module (package.json: "type": "module") (ES6 import) support, e.g. coming from refactoring commonJS, you should (at the time of writing) do either:
import { readFile } from 'fs/promises';
const pkg = JSON.parse(await readFile(new URL('./package.json', import.meta.url)));
console.log(pkg.version)
or, run the node process with node --experimental-json-modules index.js to do:
import pkg from './package.json'
console.log(pkg.version)
You will however get a warning, until json modules will become generally available.
If you get Syntax or (top level) async errors, you are likely in a an older node version. Update to at least node#14.
You can use ES6 to import package.json to retrieve version number and output the version on console.
import {name as app_name, version as app_version} from './path/to/package.json';
console.log(`App ---- ${app_name}\nVersion ---- ${app_version}`);
A safe option is to add an npm script that generates a separate version file:
"scripts": {
"build": "yarn version:output && blitz build",
"version:output": "echo 'export const Version = { version: \"'$npm_package_version.$(date +%s)'\" }' > version.js"
}
This outputs version.js with the contents:
export const Version = { version: "1.0.1.1622225484" }
To determine the package version in node code, you can use the following:
const version = require('./package.json').version; for < ES6 versions
import {version} from './package.json'; for ES6 version
const version = process.env.npm_package_version;
if application has been started using npm start, all npm_* environment variables become available.
You can use following npm packages as well - root-require, pkginfo, project-version.
we can read the version or other keys from package.json in two ways
1- using require and import the key required e.g:
const version = require('./package.json')
2 - using package_vars as mentioned in doc
process.env.npm_package_version
You can use the project-version package.
$ npm install --save project-version
Then
const version = require('project-version');
console.log(version);
//=> '1.0.0'
It uses process.env.npm_package_version but fallback on the version written in the package.json in case the env var is missing for some reason.
Why don't use the require resolve...
const packageJson = path.dirname(require.resolve('package-name')) + '/package.json';
const { version } = require(packageJson);
console.log('version', version)
With this approach work for all sub paths :)
In case you want to get version of the target package.
import { version } from 'TARGET_PACKAGE/package.json';
Example:
import { version } from 'react/package.json';
I know this isn't the intent of the OP, but I just had to do this, so hope it helps the next person.
If you're using docker-compose for your CI/CD process, you can get it this way!
version:
image: node:7-alpine
volumes:
- .:/usr/src/service/
working_dir: /usr/src/service/
command: ash -c "node -p \"require('./package.json').version.replace('\n', '')\""
for the image, you can use any node image. I use alpine because it is the smallest.
The leanest way I found:
const { version } = JSON.parse(fs.readFileSync('./package.json'))
I've actually been through most of the solutions here and they either did not work on both Windows and Linux/OSX, or didn't work at all, or relied on Unix shell tools like grep/awk/sed.
The accepted answer works technically, but it sucks your whole package.json into your build and that's a Bad Thing that only the desperate should use temporarily to get unblocked, and in general should be avoided, at least for production code. The alternative is to use that method only to write the version to a single constant that can be used instead of the whole file.
So for anyone else looking for a cross-platform solution (not reliant on Unix shell commands) and local (without external dependencies):
Since it can be assumed that Node.js is installed, and it's already cross-platform for this, I just created a make_version.js file with:
const PACKAGE_VERSION = require("./package.json").version;
console.log(`export const PACKAGE_VERSION = "${PACKAGE_VERSION}";`);
console.error("package.json version:", PACKAGE_VERSION);
and added a version command to package.json:
scripts: {
"version": "node make_version.js > src/version.js",
and then added:
"prebuild": "npm run version",
"prestart": "npm run version",
and it creates a new src/versions.js on every start or build. Of course this can be easily tuned in the version script to be a different location, or in the make_version.js file to output different syntax and constant name, etc.
I do this with findup-sync:
var findup = require('findup-sync');
var packagejson = require(findup('package.json'));
console.log(packagejson.version); // => '0.0.1'
I am using gitlab ci and want to automatically use the different versions to tag my docker images and push them. Now their default docker image does not include node so my version to do this in shell only is this
scripts/getCurrentVersion.sh
BASEDIR=$(dirname $0)
cat $BASEDIR/../package.json | grep '"version"' | head -n 1 | awk '{print $2}' | sed 's/"//g; s/,//g'
Now what this does is
Print your package json
Search for the lines with "version"
Take only the first result
Replace " and ,
Please not that i have my scripts in a subfolder with the according name in my repository. So if you don't change $BASEDIR/../package.json to $BASEDIR/package.json
Or if you want to be able to get major, minor and patch version I use this
scripts/getCurrentVersion.sh
VERSION_TYPE=$1
BASEDIR=$(dirname $0)
VERSION=$(cat $BASEDIR/../package.json | grep '"version"' | head -n 1 | awk '{print $2}' | sed 's/"//g; s/,//g')
if [ $VERSION_TYPE = "major" ]; then
echo $(echo $VERSION | awk -F "." '{print $1}' )
elif [ $VERSION_TYPE = "minor" ]; then
echo $(echo $VERSION | awk -F "." '{print $1"."$2}' )
else
echo $VERSION
fi
this way if your version was 1.2.3. Your output would look like this
$ > sh ./getCurrentVersion.sh major
1
$> sh ./getCurrentVersion.sh minor
1.2
$> sh ./getCurrentVersion.sh
1.2.3
Now the only thing you will have to make sure is that your package version will be the first time in package.json that key is used otherwise you'll end up with the wrong version
I'm using create-react-app and I don't have process.env.npm_package_version available when executing my React-app.
I did not want to reference package.json in my client-code (because of exposing dangerous info to client, like package-versions), neither I wanted to install an another dependency (genversion).
I found out that I can reference version within package.json, by using $npm_package_version in my package.json:
"scripts": {
"my_build_script": "REACT_APP_VERSION=$npm_package_version react-scripts start"
}
Now the version is always following the one in package.json.
I made a useful code to get the parent module's package.json
function loadParentPackageJson() {
if (!module.parent || !module.parent.filename) return null
let dir = path.dirname(module.parent.filename)
let maxDepth = 5
let packageJson = null
while (maxDepth > 0) {
const packageJsonPath = `${dir}/package.json`
const exists = existsSync(packageJsonPath)
if (exists) {
packageJson = require(packageJsonPath)
break
}
dir = path.resolve(dir, '../')
maxDepth--
}
return packageJson
}
If using rollup, the rollup-plugin-replace plugin can be used to add the version without exposing package.json to the client.
// rollup.config.js
import pkg from './package.json';
import { terser } from "rollup-plugin-terser";
import resolve from 'rollup-plugin-node-resolve';
import commonJS from 'rollup-plugin-commonjs'
import replace from 'rollup-plugin-replace';
export default {
plugins: [
replace({
exclude: 'node_modules/**',
'MY_PACKAGE_JSON_VERSION': pkg.version, // will replace 'MY_PACKAGE_JSON_VERSION' with package.json version throughout source code
}),
]
};
Then, in the source code, anywhere where you want to have the package.json version, you would use the string 'MY_PACKAGE_JSON_VERSION'.
// src/index.js
export const packageVersion = 'MY_PACKAGE_JSON_VERSION' // replaced with actual version number in rollup.config.js
const { version } = require("./package.json");
console.log(version);
const v = require("./package.json").version;
console.log(v);
Import your package.json file into your server.js or app.js and then access package.json properties into server file.
var package = require('./package.json');
package variable contains all the data in package.json.
Used to version web-components like this:
const { version } = require('../package.json')
class Widget extends HTMLElement {
constructor() {
super()
this.attachShadow({ mode: 'open' })
}
public connectedCallback(): void {
this.renderWidget()
}
public renderWidget = (): void => {
this.shadowRoot?.appendChild(this.setPageTemplate())
this.setAttribute('version', version)
}
}

Vue: How to build bundle for Nuxt with vue-cli-service?

A user tries to use my package for nuxt.js, but gets the error: document is not defined.
I found the first issue. When I build the bundle with "build-bundle": "vue-cli-service build --target lib --name index ./src/index.js",
vue-style-loader is being used. This, however, results in the error for using nuxt projects. This part is failing:
function addStyle (obj /* StyleObjectPart */) {
var update, remove
var styleElement = document.querySelector('style[' + ssrIdKey + '~="' + obj.id + '"]')
Document is not defined since we are using server rendering. But the question is how can I build up my package so that I can use it with nuxt?
I need:
index.common.js
index.umd.js
index.umd.min.js
This is due to the server-side rendering. If you need to specify that you want to import a resource only on the client-side, you need to use the process.client variable.
For example, in your .vue file:
if (process.client) {
require('external_library')
// do something
}
The above is the fundamental solution to document is not defined.
I checked some information and found that, this problem is not caused by your package. In fact, the problem lies on the cache-loader package in the user’s nuxt project.
For some reason cache-loader incorrectly determined the current environment as browser and not node so that vue-style-loader is confused and used client implementation instead.
So try to let users add the following configuration to the nuxt.config.js file to disable stylesheet caches on server-side:
build: {
...
cache: true,
extend(config, { isServer, isDev, isClient }) {
...
if (isServer) {
for (const rules of config.module.rules.filter(({ test }) =>
/\.((c|le|sa|sc)ss|styl.*)/.test(test.toString())
)) {
for (const rule of rules.oneOf || []) {
rule.use = rule.use.filter(
({ loader }) => loader !== 'cache-loader'
)
}
}
}
...
}
...
}
I found a solution but it is not using the vue-cli service. Instead, the files are compiled by rollup. I found using the cli service much easier. The only problem with the cli service is it will adjust the "flow" of your repo. However, you can modify the rollup.config.js to amend the folder structure.
The problem with rollup is that it isn't webpack. Therefore, all components using a webpack configuration need to be adjusted or rollup.config.js needs to be amended to include the additional functionality

The create-react-app imports restriction outside of src directory

I am using create-react-app. I am trying to call an image from my public folder from a file inside my src/components. I am receiving this error message.
./src/components/website_index.js Module not found: You attempted to
import ../../public/images/logo/WC-BlackonWhite.jpg which falls
outside of the project src/ directory. Relative imports outside of
src/ are not supported. You can either move it inside src/, or add a
symlink to it from project's node_modules/.
import logo from '../../public/images/logo_2016.png';
<img className="Header-logo" src={logo} alt="Logo" />
I have read many things saying you can do an import to the path but that is still not working for me. Any help would be greatly appreciated. I know there are many questions like this but they are all telling me to import logo or image so clearly I am missing something in the big picture.
This is special restriction added by developers of create-react-app. It is implemented in ModuleScopePlugin to ensure files reside in src/. That plugin ensures that relative imports from app's source directory don't reach outside of it.
There is no official way to disable this feature except using eject and modify webpack config.
But, most features and its updates are hidden into the internals of create-react-app system. If you make eject you will have no more new features and its update. So if you are not ready to manage and configure application included to configure webpack and so on - do not do eject operation.
Play by the existing rules - move assets to src or use based on public folder url without import.
However instead of eject there are much unofficial solutions, based on
rewire which allows you to programmatically modify the webpack config without eject. But removing the ModuleScopePlugin plugin is not good - this loses some protection and does not adds some features available in src. ModuleScopePlugin is designed to support multiple folders.
The better way is to add fully working additional directories similar to src also protected by ModuleScopePlugin. This can be done using react-app-alias
Anyway do not import from public folder - that will be duplicated in the build folder and will be available by two different url (and with different ways to load), which ultimately worsen the package download size.
Importing from the src folder is preferable and has advantages. Everything will be packed by webpack to the bundle with chunks optimal size and for best loading efficiency.
The package react-app-rewired can be used to remove the plugin. This way you do not have to eject.
Follow the steps on the npm package page (install the package and flip the calls in the package.json file) and use a config-overrides.js file similar to this one:
const ModuleScopePlugin = require('react-dev-utils/ModuleScopePlugin');
module.exports = function override(config, env) {
config.resolve.plugins = config.resolve.plugins.filter(plugin => !(plugin instanceof ModuleScopePlugin));
return config;
};
This will remove the ModuleScopePlugin from the used WebPack plugins, but leave the rest as it was and removes the necessity to eject.
Remove it using Craco:
module.exports = {
webpack: {
configure: webpackConfig => {
const scopePluginIndex = webpackConfig.resolve.plugins.findIndex(
({ constructor }) => constructor && constructor.name === 'ModuleScopePlugin'
);
webpackConfig.resolve.plugins.splice(scopePluginIndex, 1);
return webpackConfig;
}
}
};
If your images are in the public folder then you should use
"/images/logo_2016.png"
in your <img> src instead of importing
'../../public/images/logo_2016.png';
This will work
<img className="Header-logo" src="/images/logo_2016.png" alt="Logo" />
To offer a little bit more information to other's answers. You have two options regarding how to deliver the .png file to the user. The file structure should conform to the method you choose. The two options are:
Use the module system (import x from y) provided with react-create-app and bundle it with your JS. Place the image inside the src folder.
Serve it from the public folder and let Node serve the file. create-react-app also apparently comes with an environment variable e.g. <img src={process.env.PUBLIC_URL + '/img/logo.png'} />;. This means you can reference it in your React app but still have it served through Node, with your browser asking for it separately in a normal GET request.
Source: create-react-app
There are a few answers that provide solutions with react-app-rewired, but customize-cra includes a removeModuleScopePlugin() API which is a bit more elegant. (It's the same solution, but abstracted away by the customize-cra package.)
npm i --save-dev react-app-rewired customize-cra
package.json
"scripts": {
- "start": "react-scripts start"
+ "start": "react-app-rewired start",
...
},
config-overrides.js
const { removeModuleScopePlugin } = require('customize-cra')
module.exports = removeModuleScopePlugin()
I was able to import files outside of src/ by "copying" the outside files with file: as local dependency.
"dependencies": {
"#my-project/outside-dist": "file:./../../../../dist".
}
then
import {FooComponent} from "#my-project/outside-dist/components";
No eject or react-app-rewired or other 3rd-party solution was needed.
You need to move WC-BlackonWhite.jpg into your src directory. The public directory is for static files that's going to be linked directly in the HTML (such as the favicon), not stuff that you're going to import directly into your bundle.
install these two packages
npm i --save-dev react-app-rewired customize-cra
package.json
"scripts": {
- "start": "react-scripts start"
+ "start": "react-app-rewired start"
},
config-overrides.js
const { removeModuleScopePlugin } = require('customize-cra');
module.exports = function override(config, env) {
if (!config.plugins) {
config.plugins = [];
}
removeModuleScopePlugin()(config);
return config;
};
I think Lukas Bach solution to use react-app-rewired in order to modify webpack config is a good way to go, however, I wouldn't exclude the whole ModuleScopePlugin but instead whitelist the specific file that can be imported outside of src:
config-overrides.js
const ModuleScopePlugin = require("react-dev-utils/ModuleScopePlugin");
const path = require("path");
module.exports = function override(config) {
config.resolve.plugins.forEach(plugin => {
if (plugin instanceof ModuleScopePlugin) {
plugin.allowedFiles.add(path.resolve("./config.json"));
}
});
return config;
};
Copy-Paste Typescript solution
(e.g. this will work for a CRA/TS stack, which requires an additional step compared to CRA/JS. The solution itself is not typed.)
Adds the required paths to the ModuleScopePlugin instead of bluntly removing the plugin.
This code below is using craco, but should be easily usable for react-app-rewired or similar solutions. You just need to find the spot where you have a webpackConfig object (react-app-rewired: module.exports.webpack inside your config-overrides.js), and pass it to the provided functions.
craco.config.js
const path = require("path");
const enableImportsFromExternalPaths = require("./src/helpers/craco/enableImportsFromExternalPaths");
// Paths to the code you want to use
const sharedLibOne = path.resolve(__dirname, "../shared-lib-1/src");
const sharedLibTwo = path.resolve(__dirname, "../shared-lib-2/src");
module.exports = {
plugins: [
{
plugin: {
overrideWebpackConfig: ({ webpackConfig }) => {
enableImportsFromExternalPaths(webpackConfig, [
// Add the paths here
sharedLibOne,
sharedLibTwo,
]);
return webpackConfig;
},
},
},
],
};
helpers/craco/enableImportsFromExternalPaths.js
const findWebpackPlugin = (webpackConfig, pluginName) =>
webpackConfig.resolve.plugins.find(
({ constructor }) => constructor && constructor.name === pluginName
);
const enableTypescriptImportsFromExternalPaths = (
webpackConfig,
newIncludePaths
) => {
const oneOfRule = webpackConfig.module.rules.find((rule) => rule.oneOf);
if (oneOfRule) {
const tsxRule = oneOfRule.oneOf.find(
(rule) => rule.test && rule.test.toString().includes("tsx")
);
if (tsxRule) {
tsxRule.include = Array.isArray(tsxRule.include)
? [...tsxRule.include, ...newIncludePaths]
: [tsxRule.include, ...newIncludePaths];
}
}
};
const addPathsToModuleScopePlugin = (webpackConfig, paths) => {
const moduleScopePlugin = findWebpackPlugin(
webpackConfig,
"ModuleScopePlugin"
);
if (!moduleScopePlugin) {
throw new Error(
`Expected to find plugin "ModuleScopePlugin", but didn't.`
);
}
moduleScopePlugin.appSrcs = [...moduleScopePlugin.appSrcs, ...paths];
};
const enableImportsFromExternalPaths = (webpackConfig, paths) => {
enableTypescriptImportsFromExternalPaths(webpackConfig, paths);
addPathsToModuleScopePlugin(webpackConfig, paths);
};
module.exports = enableImportsFromExternalPaths;
Taken from here and here 🙏
Image inside public folder
use image inside html extension
<img src="%PUBLIC_URL%/resumepic.png"/>
use image inside js extension
<img src={process.env.PUBLIC_URL+"/resumepic.png"}/>
use image inside js Extension
This restriction makes sure all files or modules (exports) are inside src/ directory, the implementation is in ./node_modules/react-dev-utils/ModuleScopePlugin.js, in following lines of code.
// Resolve the issuer from our appSrc and make sure it's one of our files
// Maybe an indexOf === 0 would be better?
const relative = path.relative(appSrc, request.context.issuer);
// If it's not in src/ or a subdirectory, not our request!
if (relative.startsWith('../') || relative.startsWith('..\\')) {
return callback();
}
You can remove this restriction by
either changing this piece of code (not recommended)
or do eject then remove ModuleScopePlugin.js from the directory.
or comment/remove const ModuleScopePlugin = require('react-dev-utils/ModuleScopePlugin'); from ./node_modules/react-scripts/config/webpack.config.dev.js
PS: beware of the consequences of eject.
Adding to Bartek Maciejiczek's answer, this is how it looks with Craco:
const ModuleScopePlugin = require("react-dev-utils/ModuleScopePlugin");
const path = require("path");
module.exports = {
webpack: {
configure: webpackConfig => {
webpackConfig.resolve.plugins.forEach(plugin => {
if (plugin instanceof ModuleScopePlugin) {
plugin.allowedFiles.add(path.resolve("./config.json"));
}
});
return webpackConfig;
}
}
};
My previous workaround worked with Webpack 4, but not with 5. After skimming through the accumulated workarounds since then, I found the following one really easy (and seemingly scalable).
import { CracoAliasPlugin } from 'react-app-alias';
const cracoConfig = {
plugins: [
{
plugin: CracoAliasPlugin,
options: {
alias: { '~': './' },
},
},
],
}
Then import like so:
import whatever from '~/<path-to-file>';
I have had to overcome this same issue in Truffle. The solution was as follows:
ince Create-React-App's default behavior disallows importing files from outside of the src folder, we need to bring the contracts in our build folder inside src. We can copy and paste them every time we compile our contracts, but a better way is to simply configure Truffle to put the files there.
In the truffle-config.js file, replace the contents with the following:
const path = require("path");
module.exports = {
contracts_build_directory: path.join(__dirname, "client/src/contracts")
};
I don't know if this helps you, but I know I found your question when I had the same issue in Truffle, and this might help someone else.
This can be done directly without using the path to the public folder.
You can do it like
<img src="/images/image-name" alt=""/>
This happens because we do not use App.js in the browser. Since index.html is executed in the browser itself and the path to images is already in the public folder containing index.html file
You don't need to eject, you can modify the react-scripts config with the rescripts library
This would work then:
module.exports = config => {
const scopePluginIndex = config.resolve.plugins.findIndex(
({ constructor }) => constructor && constructor.name === "ModuleScopePlugin"
);
config.resolve.plugins.splice(scopePluginIndex, 1);
return config;
};
Came to the same issue in my project, and found this in the official create-react-app docs: https://create-react-app.dev/docs/using-the-public-folder/
There is an "escape hatch" to add an asset outside the module system:
If you put a file into the public folder, it will not be processed by
webpack. Instead it will be copied into the build folder untouched. To
reference assets in the public folder, you need to use an environment
variable called PUBLIC_URL.
Here's an example they provide:
render() {
// Note: this is an escape hatch and should be used sparingly!
// Normally we recommend using `import` for getting asset URLs
// as described in “Adding Images and Fonts” above this section.
return <img src={process.env.PUBLIC_URL + '/img/logo.png'} />;
}
This worked for me without installing/ changing anything
Context: I got this error when I tried to generate a build using yarn run build
Things I have done between the working and failing of yarn run build
I updated my ant-design to the latest stable version (v4.23.5).
Note: I highly believe that there is nothing to do with this version. I am just mentioning it to add more details.
This answer solved my issue. But I have changed no imports that access something outside the src directory.
The changes include updated package.json, yarn.lock, new Antd implementations (change in props mainly).
It made no sense why the build command broke/ why the answer is working.
Solution here
As all the changes are related to package.json, yarn.lock. I deleted node_modules and clean installed all the packages.
Run
yarn
or
npm install
If you only need to import a single file, such as README.md or package.json, then this can be explicitly added to ModuleScopePlugin()
config/paths.js
const resolveApp = relativePath => path.resolve(appDirectory, relativePath);
module.exports = {
appPackageJson: resolveApp('package.json'),
appReadmeMD: resolveApp('README.md'),
};
config/webpack.config.dev.js + config/webpack.config.prod.js
module.exports = {
resolve: {
plugins: [
// Prevents users from importing files from outside of src/ (or node_modules/).
// This often causes confusion because we only process files within src/ with babel.
// To fix this, we prevent you from importing files out of src/ -- if you'd like to,
// please link the files into your node_modules/ and let module-resolution kick in.
// Make sure your source files are compiled, as they will not be processed in any way.
new ModuleScopePlugin(paths.appSrc, [
paths.appPackageJson,
paths.appReadmeMD // README.md lives outside of ./src/ so needs to be explicitly included in ModuleScopePlugin()
]),
]
}
}
the best solution is to fork react-scripts, this is actually mentioned in the official documentation, see: Alternatives to Ejecting
If you need multiple modifications, like when using ant design, you can combine multiple functions like this:
const {
override,
removeModuleScopePlugin,
fixBabelImports,
} = require('customize-cra');
module.exports = override(
fixBabelImports('import', {
libraryName: 'antd',
libraryDirectory: 'es',
style: 'css',
}),
removeModuleScopePlugin(),
);
You can try using simlinks, but in reverse.
React won't follow simlinks, but you can move something to the source directory, and create a simlink to it.
In the root of my project, I had a node server directory that had several schema files in it. I wanted to use them on the frontend, so I:
moved the files /src
in the termal, I cd'ed into where the schema files belonged in server
ln -s SRC_PATH_OF_SCHEMA_FILE
This gave react what it was looking for, and node was perfectly happy including files through simlinks.
If you want to access CSS files from the public, you might face an error OUTSIDE OF SOURCE DIRECTORY
Alternatively, you can link this file in index.html which also resides in the public directory.
<link rel="stylesheet" href="App.css">
Here's an alternative that works well in simple cases (using fs and ncp). While developing, keep a script running that watches for changes to your shared folder(s) outside of /src. When changes are made, the script can automatically copy the shared folder(s) to your project. Here's an example that watches a single directory recursively:
// This should be run from the root of your project
const fs = require('fs')
const ncp = require('ncp').ncp;
ncp.limit = 16
// Watch for file changes to your shared directory outside of /src
fs.watch('../shared', { recursive: true }, (eventType, filename) => {
console.log(`${eventType}: ${filename}`)
// Copy the shared folder straight to your project /src
// You could be smarter here and only copy the changed file
ncp('../shared', './src/shared', function(err) {
if (err) {
return console.error(err);
}
console.log('finished syncing!');
});
})
This is an issue with the relative import, which might have caused because we've used "create-react-app project" command which forms a directory named project with node_modules folder and several other files in public and src folders inside it.
The create-react-app command puts a limitation that we can't import anything from outside src.
My Problem:
I had to import react-bootstrap css files which are created in node_modules folder outside the src folder.
I used import "../node_modules/bootstrap/dist/css/bootstrap.min.css"; but I got the error on terminal.
I found out that I can create a new react app and follow solution steps from A to G, in order to fix this issue.
Solution:
A) Create a new react app, using create-react-app new
B) cd new
C) run this command: "npm install react-bootstrap bootstrap#4.6.0" (without the "" double quotes )
D) in your react file put this to import bootstrap:
D.1) import "../node_modules/bootstrap/dist/css/bootstrap.min.css";
or
D.2)import Button from "react-bootstrap/Button";
E) create a bootstrap element like a Button or anything in your react file, for D.1) < button className="btn btn-success" > Bootstrap < /button>
or
for D.2) < Button variant="primary"> Bootstrap < /Button>
F) in terminal: cd src
G) in terminal: npm start,
this time it will be compiled successfully.
Reasoning:
I could see react-bootstrap working finally once I followed steps A to G in order, and this time I didn't get any error.
(I thought of this solution because:
I've used npm install "#material-ui/icons" and that got installed in the node_modules folder outside the src.
In my react file I've used import Add from "#material-ui/icons/Add"
and Material-ui icons were working fine for me,
but here also we are importing from outside src, from node_modules.. and everything works fine. Why there is no error of importing from outside src this time)
That's why I just created a new react app, and followed solution steps A to G.
If you want to set a background image using CSS. So you have to set the image using the URL of your's localhost and add the path of your image. Just see the example below.
.banner {
width: 100%;
height: 100vh;
background-image: url("http://localhost:3000/img/bg.jpg");
background-size: cover;
background-repeat: no-repeat;
}
Posting here what #Flaom wrote as a comment in the marked as reply answer and that actually saves lives:
"How is this the accepted answer? This bogus restriction is trivially eliminated by simply setting NODE_PATH=./src/.. in the .env file. By doing so, you can import from outside of the src folder without going through the pain associated with ejecting your app. "
Flaom
EDIT Added some more info as #cigien requested.
All the answers above describe very well why we cannot use an image from the public folder when we create our react app with the create-react-app. Having the issue myself and reading all these answers I realized that, what the answers say is to "hack" the app in order to remove the module that restricts us. Some of the answers don't even have an undo option. For a "training" application that is ok.
Personally I would not want to add a solution that alters the concept of the app to my own project, specially in a commercial one. #Flaom solution is the simplest and if anything change in the future it can be replaced with another solution. It has no risk, it can be removed anytime and is the simplest.
This was my code:
import React from 'react';
import './Navbar.scss';
import {images} from '../../constants';
const Navbar = () => {
return (
<nav>
<div>
< img src = {images.logo} alt = "logo" />
</div>
</nav>
);
}
export default Navbar;
Changed it too:
import React from 'react';
import './Navbar.scss';
import {images} from '././constants';
const Navbar = () => {
return (
<nav>
<div>
< img src = {images.logo} alt = "logo" />
</div>
</nav>
);
}
export default Navbar;
And it worked! Im getting better at fixing bugs haha.
If you file reside in public folder and if you want to import it without eject or without using react-app-rewired then in that case you can access file via domains name and the path of the file and using axios.
Example: There is a font file called favico.ico located inside public folder. You want to import it in one the file located in src. You
can access the font using following logic.
axios.get('example.com/favico.ico').then(() => {
// here you can access this file.
})
In above example example.com is domain. If you have different environment like localhost, staging, production then in that case the domain name is different.
So, to get the favico.ico you can use following logic.
axios.get(`${window.location.origin}/favico.ico`).then(() => {
// here you can access this file.
})
In above example you window.location.origin give you current domain meaning if you run your code locally then, it will give you http://localhost:{portnumber},
If your code run on production and production domain is example.com then, it will give you "example.com". So using this pattern you can access assets located in public folder.

Cannot put winston inside a nodejs module

I'm separating my application in modules, but each of these modules have functions that must me logged. So my idea was to create a file winstonConfig.js which would configure the winston, and then I'd require this file in each of the modules that need to log things. Here's winstonConfig.js:
var winston = require('winston');
winston.add(winston.transports.Riak, { level: 'warn' });
winston.add(winston.transports.File, { filename: 'mylogfile.log', level: 'silly' });
exports.log = winston.log;
exports.debug = winston.debug;
exports.error = winston.error;
(btw, is there a way to export everything once?)
but when I require('./winstonConfig.js') in my index.js, I get:
node_modules/winston/lib/winston/logger.js:481
var instance = created ? transport : (new (transport)(options));
^
TypeError: transport is not a constructor
but the exact same code (without exports) will work without any problem when put in index.js (the problem is that then I cannot import this to other modules)
I got the same error with a new project, but when I was trying to use "logger.transports.DailyRotateFile". Then I realized that my code (that was copied from another project) just works for winston 1 (same version used on the other project). So, I just downgraded the lib to version 1 and everything worked normally:
$ npm uninstall winston --save
$ npm install winston#1.x.x --save
But if you want to use winston 2, I found the solution below to use DailyRotateFile - and, probably, there is a similar solution to use other kind of transports.
var winston = require('winston'), expressWinston = require('express-winston');
winston.transports.DailyRotateFile = require('winston-daily-rotate-file');
It looks like you're missing:
require('winston-riak');
I get the same error with your code.
If I comment out the addition of the Riak transport I get no error.
If I require winston-riak:
var winston = require('winston');
require('winston-riak');
winston.add(winston.transports.Riak, { level: 'warn' });
winston.add(winston.transports.File, { filename: 'mylogfile.log', level: 'debug' });
exports.log = winston.log;
exports.debug = winston.debug;
exports.error = winston.error;
I get error: TypeError: riakjs.getClient is not a function. This appears to be because 'winston-riak' tries to execute riakjs.getClient(options) but, per https://github.com/mostlyserious/riak-js/issues/234, getClient is the exported function, rather than a method of the exported object. The winston-riak module hasn't been updated for 5 years. It seems it is not compatible with the current riak-js, which was updated 2 years ago.

Categories