We Keep Coding

Improving iScroll performance on a large table

I'm updating a table header and its first column positions programatically based on how the user scrolls around to keep them aligned.
The issue I'm experiencing is that as soon as my data sets gets big enough, the scrolling gets more and more choppy/less smooth.
The relevant code is at the very bottom of the fiddle:
iScroll.on('scroll', function(){
var pos = $('#scroller').position();
$('#pos').text('pos.left=' + pos.left + ' pos.top=' + pos.top);
// code to hold first row and first column
$('#scroller th:nth-child(1)').css({top: (-pos.top), left: (-pos.left), position:'relative'});
$('#scroller th:nth-child(n+1)').css({top: (-pos.top), position:'relative'});
// this seems to be the most expensive operation:
$('#scroller td:nth-child(1)').css({left: (-pos.left), position:'relative'});
});
I know that this can be written a lot more efficent by caching the elements and so on. For example, I have tried saving the elements in to an array and updating their position in a more "vanilla" fashion:
headerElements[i].style.left = left + 'px'; // etc...
No matter how fast I make the callback, I'm still not happy about the result. Do you have any suggestions?
https://jsfiddle.net/0qv1kjac/16/

Just use ClusterizeJS! It can handle hundreds of thousands of rows and was built exactly for this purpose.
How does it work, you ask?
The main idea is not to pollute DOM with all used tags. Instead of that - it splits the list to clusters, then shows elements for current scroll position and adds extra rows to top and bottom of the list to emulate full height of table so that browser shows scrollbar as for full list

To be able to handle big amounts of data you need data virtualization. It has some restrictions, though.
First you need to decide the size of a view port. Let's say you want to render 10 items in a row and 20 items in column. It would be 10x20 items then. In you fiddle it's div with id wrapper.
Then you need to know total amount of data you have. From your fiddle it would be 100x100 items. And, also you need to know height and width of a item (cell). Let's take 40x120 (in px).
So div#wrapper is a view port, it should have fixed sized like 10x20 items. Then you need to set up correct width and height for table. The height of table would be equal to total amount of data in column including head by item height. Width for table would be total amount of items in single row by item width.
Once you set up these, div#wrapper will receive horizontal and vertical scrolls. Now you able to scroll left and bottom, but it will be just empty space. However this empty space is able to hold exact amount of data you have.
Then you need to take scroll data left and top (position), which comes in pixels and normalize it to amount of items, so you could know not how many pixels you've scrolled, but how many items you've scrolled(or rows if we scroll from top to bottom).
It could be done by division of pixels scrolled on item height. For example, you scrolled to left by 80px, that's 2 items. It means these items should be invisible because you've scrolled past them. So you know that you scrolled past 2 items, and you know that you should see 10 items in a row. That means you take your data array which has data for row with 100 items, and slice it like this:
var visibleItems = rowData.slice(itemsScrolled, itemsScrolled + 10);
It will give you items which should be visible in viewport at current scroll position. Once you have these items you need to construct html and append it to table.
Also on each scroll event you need to set top and left position for tbody and thead so they would move with scroll, otherwise you will have your data, but it will be at (0; 0) inside a viewport.
Anyway, code speaks thousand of words, so here's the fiddle: https://jsfiddle.net/Ldfjrg81/9/
Note, that this approach requires heights and widths to be precise, otherwise it will work incorrectly. Also if you have items of different sizes, this also should be taken into consideration, so better if you have fixed and equal sizes of items. In jsfiddle, I commented out the code which forces first column to stay in place, but you can render it separately.
It's a good solution to stick to some library as suggested in comments, since it handles a lot of cases for you.
You can make rendering even faster if use react.js or vue.js

This won't be the answer your are looking for but here's my 2 cents anyway.
Javascript animation (especially given the amount that the DOM has to render) will never be as smooth as you want it. Even if you could get it smooth on your machine, chances are that it will vary drastically on other peoples (Older PC's, Browsers etc).
I would see 2 options if I were to tackle this myself.
Go old school and add a horizontal and vertical scrollbar. I know it's not a pretty solution but it would work well.
Only render a certain amount of rows and discard those off screen. This could be a bit complicated but in essence you would render say 10 rows. Once the user scrolls to a point where the 11th should be there, render that one and remove the 1st. You would pop them in and out as needed.
In terms of the actual JS (you mentioned putting elements in to an array), that isn't going to help. The actual choppyness is due to the browser needing to render that many elements in the first place.

You're experiencing choppy / non-smooth scrolling because the scroll event fires at a very high pace.
And every time it fires you're adjusting the position of many elements: this is expensive and furthermore until the browser has completed the repaint it's unresponsive (here the choppy scrolling).
I see two options:
Option number one: display only the visible subset of the whole data set (this has been already suggested in another answer so I won't go futher)
Option number two (easier)
First, let animations on left and top css changes occurr via transitions. This is more efficient, is non-blocking and often let the browser take advantage of the gpu
Then instead of repeteadly adjust left and top, do it once a while; for example 0.5 seconds. This is done by the function ScrollWorker() (see code below) that recalls itself via a setTimeout().
Finally use the callback invoked by the scroll event to keep the #scroller position (stored in a variable) updated.
// Position of the `#scroller` element
// (I used two globals that may pollute the global namespace
// that piece of code is just for explanation purpose)
var oldPosition,
newPosition;
// Use transition to perform animations
// You may set this in the stylesheet
$('th').css( { 'transition': 'left 0.5s, top 0.5s' } );
$('td').css( { 'transition': 'left 0.5s, top 0.5s' } );
// Save the initial position
newPosition = $('#scroller').position();
oldPosition = $('#scroller').position();
// Upon scroll just set the position value
iScroll.on('scroll', function() {
newPosition = $('#scroller').position();
} );
// Start the scroll worker
ScrollWorker();
function ScrollWorker() {
// Adjust the layout if position changed (your original code)
if( newPosition.left != oldPosition.left || newPosition.top != oldPosition.top ) {
$('#scroller th:nth-child(1)').css({top: (-newPosition.top), left: (-newPosition.left), position:'relative'});
$('#scroller th:nth-child(n+1)').css({top: (-newPosition.top), position:'relative'});
$('#scroller td:nth-child(1)').css({left: (-newPosition.left), position:'relative'});
// Update the stored position
oldPosition.left = newPosition.left;
oldPosition.top = newPosition.top;
// Let animation complete then check again
// You may adjust the timer value
// The timer value must be higher or equal the transition time
setTimeout( ScrollWorker, 500 );
} else {
// No changes
// Check again after just 0.1secs
setTimeout( ScrollWorker, 100 );
}
}
Here is the Fiddle
I set the Worker pace and the transition time to 0.5 secs. You may adjust the value with higher or lower timing, eventually in a dinamic way based on the number of elements in the table.

Yes! Here are some improvements to the code from your JS Fiddle. You can view my edits at: https://jsfiddle.net/briankueck/u63maywa/
Some suggested improvements are:
Switching position:relative values in the JS layer to position:fixed in the CSS layer.
Shortening the jQuery DOM chains, so that the code doesn't start at the root element & walk all the way through the dom with each $ lookup. The scroller is now the root element. Everything uses .find() off of that element, which creates shorter trees & jQuery can traverse those branches faster.
Moving the logging code out of the DOM & into the console.log. I've added a debugging switch to disable it, as you're looking for the fastest scrolling on the table. If it runs fast enough for you, then you can always re-enable it to see it in the JSFiddle. If you really need to see that on the iPhone, then it can be added into the DOM. Although, it's probably not necessary to see the left & top position values in the iPhone.
Remove all extraneous $ values, which aren't mapped to the jQuery object. Something like $scroller gets confusing with $, as the latter is the jQuery library, but the former isn't.
Switching to ES6 syntax, by using let instead of var will make your code look more modern.
There is a new left calculation in the <th> tag, which you'll want to look at.
The iScroll event listener has been cleaned up. With position:fixed, the top <th> tags only need to have the top property applied to them. The left <td> tags only need to have the left property applied to them. The corner <th> needs to have both the top & left property applied to it.
Remove everything that's unnecessary, like the extraneous HTML tags which were used for logging purposes.
If you really want to go more vanilla, change out the .css() methods for the actual .style.left= -pos.left + 'px'; and .style.top= -pos.top + 'px'; properties in the JS code.
Try using a diff tool like WinMerge or Beyond Compare to compare the code from your version to what's in my edits, so that you can easily see the differences.
Hopefully, this will make the scrolling smoother, as the scroll event doesn't have to process anything that it doesn't need to do... like 5 full DOM traversing look-ups, rather than 3 short-tree searches.
Enjoy! :)
HTML:
<body>
<div id="wrapper">
<table id="scroller">
<thead>
</thead>
<tbody>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</body>
CSS:
/* ... only the relevant bits ... */
thead th {
background-color: #99a;
min-width: 120px;
height: 32px;
border: 1px solid #222;
position: fixed; /* New */
z-index: 9;
}
thead th:nth-child(1) {/*first cell in the header*/
border-left: 1px solid #222; /* New: Border fix */
border-right: 2px solid #222; /* New: Border fix */
position: fixed; /* New */
display: block; /*seperates the first cell in the header from the header*/
background-color: #88b;
z-index: 10;
}
JS:
// main code
let debug = false;
$(function(){
let scroller = $('#scroller');
let top = $('<tr/>');
for (var i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
let left = (i === 0) ? 0 : 1;
top.append('<th style="left:' + ((123*i)+left) + 'px;">'+ Math.random().toString(36).substring(7) +'</th>');
}
scroller.find('thead').append(top);
for (let i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
let row = $('<tr/>');
for (let j = 0; j < 100; j++) {
row.append('<td>'+ Math.random().toString(36).substring(7) +'</td>');
}
scroller.find('tbody').append(row);
}
if (debug) console.log('initialize iscroll');
let iScroll = null;
try {
iScroll = new IScroll('#wrapper', {
interactiveScrollbars: true,
scrollbars: true,
scrollX: true,
probeType: 3,
useTransition:false,
bounce:false
});
} catch(e) {
if (debug) console.error(e.name + ":" + e.message + "\n" + e.stack);
}
if (debug) console.log('initialized');
iScroll.on('scroll', function(){
let pos = scroller.position();
if (debug) console.log('pos.left=' + pos.left + ' pos.top=' + pos.top);
// code to hold first row and first column
scroller.find('th').css({top:-pos.top}); // Top Row
scroller.find('th:nth-child(1)').css({left:-pos.left}); // Corner
scroller.find('td:nth-child(1)').css({left:-pos.left}); // 1st Left Column
});
});

Is it necessary that you create your own scroller? Why don't you just style the data in HTML/CSS and just use the overflow attribute? JavaScript needs work on it's ability to adjust framerates. I was using your jFiddle earlier and it worked just fine with the native overflow handler.

Found this in the manual. Probably not what you wanna hear but it's the way it is:
IScroll is a class that needs to be initiated for each scrolling area. There's no limit to the number of iScrolls you can have in each page if not that imposed by the device CPU/Memory.
Try to keep the DOM as simple as possible. iScroll uses the hardware compositing layer but there's a limit to the elements the hardware can handle.

The reason the performance degradation is happening is that your scroll event handler is firing again and again and again instead of waiting for a reasonable and imperceptible interval.
The screenshot shows what happened when I tracked how many times the event handler fired, while scrolling for just a few seconds. The computationally-heavy event handler was fired over 600 times!!! This is more than 60 times per second!!!
It may seem counter-intuitive, but reducing the frequency that the table is updated will vastly increase perceived response times. If your user scrolls for fraction of a second, about 150 milliseconds, and the table is updated ten times, freezing the display during the scrolling, the net result is far worse than if the table were updated only three times and moved fluidly rather than freezing. It is just wasted processor burn to update more times than the browser can handle without freezing.
So, how do you make an event handler that fires at a maximum frequency, for example 25 times per second, even it is triggered much more often, like 100 times per second?
The naive way of doing it is to run a setInterval event. That is better, but horribly inefficient as well. There is a better way of doing it, by setting a delayed event handler, and clearing it on subsequent invocations before setting it again, until the minimum time interval has passed. This way it only runs no more often than at the maximum desired frequency. This is one major case for why the ``clearInterval'' method was invented.
Here is live working code:
https://jsfiddle.net/pgjvf7pb/7/
Note: when refreshing continuously like this, the header column may appear out of position.
I advise to do the update only when the scrolling has paused for about 25ms or so, rather than continuously. This way, it appears to the user that the header column is dynamically calculated as well as being fixed in place, because it appears instantly after scrolling rather than seeming to scroll with the data.
https://jsfiddle.net/5vcqv7nq/2/
The logic is like this:
variables outside your event handler
// stores the scrolling operation for a tiny delay to prevent redundancy
var fresh;
// stores time of last scrolling refresh
var lastfresh = new Date();
operations inside your event handler
// clears redundant scrolling operations before they are applied
if (fresh) clearTimeout(fresh);
var x = function() {
// stores new time of scrolling refresh
lastfresh = new Date();
// perform scrolling update operations here...
};
// refresh instantly if it is more than 50ms out of date
if (new Date() - lastfresh > 50) x();
// otherwise, pause for half of that time to avoid wasted runs
else fresh = setTimeout(x, 25);
Demo: https://jsfiddle.net/pgjvf7pb/7/
Once again, I recommend that you remove the line of code that refreshes the data instantly, and the else condition after that, and simply use one line
fresh = setTimeout(x, 25);
This will appear to instantly calculate the header column the moment any scrolling is finished, and saves even more operations. My second link to JS Fiddle shows what this looks like, here: https://jsfiddle.net/5vcqv7nq/2/

Basic JS - Is this function okay?

I have a carousel (Owl Carousel) with vertically centered controls. Because of the structure, I have to absolutely position the previous and next arrow. Because the page is responsive, their position is dynamic. The size of the controls may also change.
I've written a function that runs on load and resize. It gets the height of the image and the height of the controls, subtracts the latter from the former, divides by two, and then uses that number as the controls' margin-top.
It works, but I'm questioning if I'm getting and using all the variables correctly. Does JavaScript read in order? Where it runs the first line, then the next, then the next... I'm strong in CSS but JS has always been a crutch.
Can I write this more efficiently?
function centerCarouselControls() {
var carouselImage = $('.carousel-card > img');
var carouselControls = $('.owl-nav > div');
var carouselHeight = carouselImage.outerHeight();
var controlHeight = carouselControls.outerHeight();
var controlMargin = (carouselHeight - controlHeight) / 2;
carouselControls.css('margin-top', controlMargin);
}
$('.carousel-card > img').load(centerCarouselControls);
$(window).on('resize', centerCarouselControls);
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.1.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
I feel like this might be the type of question that gets flagged on here for not being specific enough. If that's the case, could someone please point me to a community where this would be more appropriate? Thanks!

In some browsers your code works like firefox 51, but it is more complete code this:
carouselControls.css('margin-top', controlMargin + 'px');

Link two HTML divs' dimensions to each other?

If I have div A and div B, is there a way to say A.width = b.width = MAX(a.width, b.width) ? That is, whichever has the largest inner content would dictate how large both are.
The actual problem I'm trying to solve is with columns - left, middle, and right. I want the left and right to be the same fixed width (but this could vary depending on their content).

It is not possible to use CSS to achieve this. However, if there is a way to do it with a JS-based solution. Here I am using jQuery. Let's say you have two divs, with classes a and b respectively.
$(function() {
function equalizeSize($ele) {
if($ele.length > 1) {
// Let CSS automatically calculate natural width first
$ele.css({ width: 'auto' });
// And then we fetch the newly calculated widths
var maxWidth = Math.max.apply(Math, $ele.map(function(){ return $(this).outerWidth(); }).get());
$ele.css({ width: maxWidth });
}
}
// Run when DOM is ready
equalizeSize($('.a, .b'));
// Run again when viewport has been resized, which **may** affect your div width.
// This is optional, but good to have
// ps: You might want to look into throttling the resize function
$(window).resize(equalizeSize($('.a, .b')));
});
See proof-of-concept fiddle here: http://jsfiddle.net/teddyrised/N4MMg/
The advantages of this simple function:
Allows you to dictate what elements you want to equalize widths with.
Uses the .map() function to construct an array, which we then use Math.max.apply to get the maximum value in the array
Forces automatic calculation of width when the function first fires (especially when resizing the viewport)
Allows you to call to recalculate the size again, using the handler equalizeSize() when you change the content in the divs... you can call the function again, say, after an AJAX call that appends content to either element.

It is not very clear what you want from the description. but I can rewrite your code this way.
var properWidth = Math.max($("#a").width(), $("#b").width());
$("#a").css("width", properWidth + "px");
$("#b").css("width", properWidth + "px");
I am not sure if it is this kind of solution you want.

I'm not sure there is a way to do it like that. But why not make a default function to set the size:
function changeSize(w, h)
{
A.setAttribute('style', 'width:'+w+'; height:'+h);
b.setAttribute('style', 'width:'+w+'; height:'+h);
}
Working fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/kychan/ER2zZ/

How do I get the height of a textarea

I need to get the height of a textarea. Seemingly so simple but it's driving me mad.
I have been researching for ages on stackoverflow with no luck: textarea-value-height and jquery-js-get-the-scrollbar-height-of-an-textarea and javascript-how-to-get-the-height-of-text-inside-of-a-textarea, among many others.
This is how it looks currently:
This is how I want it to look, open a full height:
.
Here is my html:
<textarea id="history" class="input-xxlarge" placeholder="Enter the content ..." rows="13"></textarea>
CSS:
.input-xxlarge {
display: inline-block;
height: auto;
font-size: 12px;
width: 530px;
resize: none;
overflow: auto;
}
jQuery:
var textarea = $('#history');
I've tried (inter alia):
1. textarea.height() --> always returns 0
2. textarea.ready(function() { // wait for DOM to load
textarea.height();
}
3. getting scrollheight from textarea as an HTMLTextareaElement (i.e. DOM Element) --> returns 0
4. var contentSpan = textarea.wrapInner('<span>');
var height = contentSpan.height(); --> always returns 0
Please help, I'm at my wit's end!

Ok, I've found a solution. Whether it's the best solution, I don't know, but it works and that, frankly, is all I care about, having spent almost a day on this issue.
Here it is for anyone who faces the same problem:
Select the textarea:
var textarea = $('#history');
Get the textarea's text:
var text = textarea.text();
Create a temporary div:
var div = $('<div id="temp"></div>');
Set the temp div's width to be the same as the textarea. Very important else the text will be all on one line in the new temp div!:
div.css({
"width":"530px"
});
Insert the text into the new temp div:
div.text(text);
Append it to the DOM:
$('body').append(div);
Get the height of the div:
var divHeight = $('#temp').height();
Remove the temp div from the DOM:
div.remove();

Had a similar issue, in my case I wanted to have an expand button, that would toggle between two states (expanded/collapsed). After searching also for hours I finally came up with this solution:
Use the .prop to get the content height - works with dynamically filled textareas and then on a load command set it to your textarea.
Get the inner height:
var innerHeight = $('#MyTextarea').prop('scrollHeight');
Set it to your element
$('#MyTextarea').height(innerHeight);
Complete code with my expand button(I had min-height set on my textarea):
$(document).on("click", '.expand-textarea', function () {
$(this).toggleClass('Expanded');
if($(this).hasClass('Expanded'))
$($(this).data('target')).height(1);
else
$($(this).data('target')).height($($(this).data('target')).prop('scrollHeight'));
});

Modern answer: textarea sizing is a few lines of ES6 implementable two primary ways. It does not require (or benefit from) jQuery, nor does it require duplication of the content being sized.
As this is most often required to implement the functionality of auto-sizing, the code given below implements this feature. If your modal dialog containing the text area is not artificially constrained, but can adapt to the inner content size, this can be a perfect solution. E.g. don't specify the modal body's height and remove overflow-y directives. (Then no JS will be required to adjust the modal height at all.)
See the final section for additional details if you really, truly only actually need to fetch the height, not adapt the height of the textarea itself.
Line–Based
Pro: almost trivial. Pro: exploits existing user-agent behavior which does the heavy lifting (font metric calculations) for you. Con: impossible to animate. Con: extended to support constraints as per my codepen used to explore this problem, constraints are encoded into the HTML, not part of the CSS, as data attributes.
/* Lines must not wrap using this technique. */
textarea { overflow-x: auto; white-space: nowrap; resize: none }
for ( let elem of document.getElementsByTagName('textarea') ) {
// Prevent "jagged flashes" as lines are added.
elem.addEventListener('keydown', e => if ( e.which === 13 ) e.target.rows = e.target.rows + 1)
// React to the finalization of keyboard entry.
elem.addEventListener('keyup', e => e.target.rows = (elem.value.match(/\n/g) || "").length + 1)
}
Scrollable Region–Based
Pro: still almost trivial. Pro: animatable in CSS (i.e. using transition), though with some mild difficulty relating to collapsing back down. Pro: constraints defined in CSS through min-height and max-height. Con: unless carefully calculated, constraints may crop lines.
for ( let elem of document.getElementsByTagName('textarea') )
elem.addEventListener('keyup', e => {
e.target.style.height = 0 // SEE NOTE
e.target.style.height = e.target.scrollHeight + 'px'
})
A shocking percentage of the search results utilizing scrollHeight never consider the case of reducing size; for details, see below. Or they utilize events "in the wrong order" resulting in an apparent delay between entry and update, e.g. pressing enter… then any other key in order to update. Example.
Solution to Initial Question
The initial question specifically related to fetching the height of a textarea. The second approach to auto-sizing, there, demonstrates the solution to that specific question in relation to the actual content. scrollHeight contains the height of the element regardless of constraint, e.g. its inner content size.
Note: scrollHeight is technically the Math.max() of the element's outer height or the inner height, whichever is larger. Thus the initial assignment of zero height. Without this, the textarea would expand, but never collapse. Initial assignment of zero ensures you retrieve the actual inner content height. For sampling without alteration, remove the height override (assign '') or preserve (prior to) then restore after retrieval of scrolllHeight.
To calculate just the height of the element as-is, utilize getComputedStyle and parse the result:
parseInt(getComputedStyle(elem).height, 10)
But really, please consider just adjusting the CSS to permit the modal to expand naturally rather than involving JavaScript at all.

Place this BEFORE any HTML elements.
<script src="/path/to/jquery.js"></script>
<script>
$(document).ready(function(){
var textarea = $('#history');
alert(textarea.height()); //returns correct height
});
</script>
You obviously do not have to alert it. I was just using an easily visible example.

Given a textarea with an id of "history", this jQuery will return it's height:
$('#history').height()
Please see a working example at http://jsfiddle.net/jhfrench/JcGGR/

You can also retrieve the height in pixels by using $('#history').css('height'); if you're not planning on doing any calculations.

for current height in px:
height = window.getComputedStyle(document.querySelector('textarea')).getPropertyValue('height')
for current width in px:
width = window.getComputedStyle(document.querySelector('textarea')).getPropertyValue('width')
change 'textarea' to '#history' or like a css selector. or textarea, since a variable is declared to select element.

jQueryui animation with inital undefined height

See the following fiddle:
[edit: updated fiddle => http://jsfiddle.net/NYZf8/5/ ]
http://jsfiddle.net/NYZf8/1/ (view in different screen sizes, so that ideally the image fits inside the %-width layouted div)
The image should start the animation from the position where it correctly appears after the animation is done.
I don't understand why the first call to setMargin() sets a negative margin even though the logged height for container div and img are the very same ones, that after the jqueryui show() call set the image where I would want it (from the start on). My guess is that somehow the image height is 0/undefined after all, even though it logs fine :?
js:
console.log('img: ' + $('img').height());
console.log('div: ' + $('div').height());
$('img').show('blind', 1500, setMargin);
function setMargin() {
var marginTop =
( $('img').closest('div').height() - $('img').height() ) / 2;
console.log('marginTop: ' + marginTop);
$('img').css('marginTop', marginTop + 'px');
}
setMargin();

Interesting problem...after playing around with your code for a while (latest update), I saw that the blind animation was not actually firing in my browser (I'm testing on Chrome, and maybe it was firing but I wasn't seeing it as the image was never hidden in the first place), so I tried moving it inside the binded load function:
$('img').bind('load', function() {
...
$(this).show('blind', 500);
});
Now that it was animating, it seemed to 'snap' or 'jump' after the animation was complete, and also seemed to appear with an incorrect margin. This smacks of jQuery not being able to correctly calculate the dimensions of something that hadn't been displayed on the screen yet. On top of that, blind seems to need more explicit dimensions to operate correctly. So therein lies the problem: how to calculate elements' rendered dimensions before they've actually appeared on the screen?
One way to do this is to fade in the element whose dimensions you're trying to calculate very slightly - not enough to see yet - do some calculations, then hide it again and prep it for the appearance animation. You can achieve this with jQuery using the fadeTo function:
$('img').bind('load', function() {
$(this).fadeTo(0, 0.01, function() {
// do calculations...
}
}
You would need to work out dimensions, apply them with the css() function, blind the image in and then reset the image styles back to their original states, all thanks to a blind animation that needs these dimensions explicitly. I would also recommend using classes in the css to help you manage things a little better. Here's a detailed working example: jsfiddle working example
Not the most elegant way of doing things, but it's a start. There are a lot more easier ways to achieve seemingly better results, and I guess I just want to know why you're looking to do image blinds and explicit alignment this way? It's just a lot more challenging achieving it with the code you used...anyways, hope this helps! :)