HTML:
- for (x in dict)
div.test
div.ContentFlow
div.loadIndicator
div.indicator
div.flow
- for (var i in dict[x])
img(class='item', src='/images/' + dict[x][i] + '.jpg')
my CSS:
.test {
display:block;
}
.ContentFlow {
margin-top: 10%;
}
client-side JS:
var count = 0
var items;
var amount = 0;
$(window).load(function(){
items = $("#test .ContentFlow");
amount = items.length;
items.hide();
items.eq(count).show();
}
$(window).load(setInterval(function(){
// tried this as well
//var items = $("#test .ContentFlow");
//var amount = items.length;
items.eq(count).hide();
count >= amount-1 ? count = 0 : count++;
items.eq(count).show();
}, 1000));
ConentFlow css/js:
http://www.jacksasylum.eu/ContentFlow/docu.php
I am trying to rotate the .ContentFlow div every 5 secs. However, its not working. After setting display:none for ContentFlow class, nothing gets displayed at load time and thereafter. If I dont set display:none for ContentFlow divs in my css, all the divs show up at load time
Which properties should I use for it to work. Please let me know if the question is not clear.
Move
items = $(".ContentFlow");
var amount = items.length;
inside the functions so that it is executed after window load.
Refactored:
var count = 0;
$(window).load(function(){
// Hide at first
$("#test .ContentFlow").hide();
// Start repeating toggle
setInterval(function(){
var items = $("#test .ContentFlow");
var amount = items.length;
items.eq(count).hide();
(count >= amount-1) ? count = 0 : count++;
items.eq(count).show();
}, 1000);
};
Instead of doing the initial hiding using $("#test .ContentFlow").hide();, you might want to just set a style .ContentFlow{display:none;} to avoid flicker when the page is still loading.
I recommend that you use the latest version of ContentFlow v1.0.2 that allows for multiple ContentFlows to be on the same webpage, each with a unique JavaScript handler.
Then, you can use the ContentFlow Slideshow Plugin which you then handle all the timing requirements you need.
The nice thing about the Slideshow plugin is that each ContentFlow can be set to a different timing speed.
Related
I've made a slider with jQuery using html tags which have classes instead of IDs so that I will be able to use the same jQuery code for other duplicated sliders.
The problem is, I want the width of my ul to be calculated based on the number of lis, instead of setting it manually in CSS. When there is only one slider I can set my vars outside of the function, but when I have to use it though event attributes on my html parts so that I will be able to use them for multiple sliders, I have to move the vars inside of my function, which sets the wrong width.
This is my code:
function OLAR(direction,span) {
var OurNexNPrv = $(span);
var Parent_OLAR = OurNexNPrv.parents('.OLAR');
var UL_OF_OLAR = Parent_OLAR.find('.OLAR_CONTENT ul');
var LI_OF_OLAR = UL_OF_OLAR.find('li');
var LI_OF_OLAR_LENGTH = LI_OF_OLAR.length;
var Quantity_OF_OLAR_PAGES = LI_OF_OLAR_LENGTH / 3;
var Max_Margin_LEFT = -(Quantity_OF_OLAR_PAGES - 1) * 576;
UL_OF_OLAR.css('width',LI_OF_OLAR_LENGTH*192);
var AffectedLeftMargin;
var CurrentLeftMargin = UL_OF_OLAR.css('margin-left');
CurrentLeftMargin = parseFloat(CurrentLeftMargin);
if (direction == 'right') {
AffectedLeftMargin = CurrentLeftMargin - 576;
}
if (direction == 'left') {
AffectedLeftMargin = CurrentLeftMargin + 576;
}
if (AffectedLeftMargin < Max_Margin_LEFT) {
AffectedLeftMargin = 0;
}
if (AffectedLeftMargin > 0) {
AffectedLeftMargin = Max_Margin_LEFT;
}
UL_OF_OLAR.animate({'marginLeft': AffectedLeftMargin}, 1000);
}
$('.CIRCLE_LOAD_RIGHT').click(function () {
OLAR('right');
});
$('.CIRCLE_LOAD_LEFT').click(function () {
OLAR('left');
});
How can I set the width for each of my uls individually, through css commands outside of that function?
Okay, my ul tag did not have the absolute position; after giving it the right position and left:0 and bottom:0 or right:0 and bottom:0 (based on your language)the given width which comes from JQuery code can rhyme perfectly with everything else. I've tried it with multiple sliders and it works perfectly :)
So, we need an anchor point in order to make this work. And there is nothing wrong with this JQuery code which has been mentioned above!
Have a great day.
I am making an info screen, and for that, it needs to show reviews from their customers pulled from Trustpilot.
I got the reviews and everything formatted in HTML showing the 20 latest, but I want to present it very sweet. I am not a JavaScript guru, but I thought i would do it using jQuery and its fadein function.
What is want, is have 20 unique divs fading in with X milliseconds difference popping randomly up. By unique I mean, that each div must have unique content. And by randomly popping up, I mean that if box 1 spawns first, then the next should be 5, then 14 etc, and then another cycle the next time around.
Just like what I made here;
$(function() {
var box = $('.box');
var delay = 100;
for (i = 0; i < 30; i++) {
setTimeout(function() {
var new_box = box.clone();
$('.container').append(new_box);
new_box.fadeIn();
}, delay);
delay += 500; // Delay the next box by an extra 500ms
}
});
http://jsfiddle.net/CCawh/5/
Is this even possible, and how would this be done?
I am very new to JavaScript, so please bear with me if I ask to much
Thanks in advance.
EDIT:
The HTML i want to spawn will all be wrapped in divs, so it would go like this;
<div id="one">content</div>
<div id="two">content</div>
<div id="three">content</div>
<div id="four">content</div>
etc.
Made up a nice function for you. I believe this may be what you are looking for
Here's a rundown of how it works :
Populate an array with numbers randomly generated 1-10 in this case.
Run through that array with a set interval, and when everything has
been added stop the interval
pretty straightforward from there. Set the visibility etc. You should be able to change up the function to dynamically add HTML elements and what-not, but just giving you something to start with.
var usedNum = [];
var i, j, y;
i = 0;
for(y = 0; y < 10; y++){
var x = Math.floor((Math.random() * 10) + 1);
if(!isUsed(x)) usedNum.push(x);
else y--;
}
var showInterval = setInterval ( function(){
if(i == 10){
clearInterval(showInterval);
}
$(".container div[data-line='" + usedNum[i] + "']").css({opacity: 0.0, visibility: "visible"}).animate({opacity: 1.0});
i++;
}, 500);
function isUsed(num) {
var used = false;
for(j = 0; j < usedNum.length; j++){
if(usedNum[j] == num){
used = true;
}
}
return used;
}
Demo fiddle : http://jsfiddle.net/xS39F/3/
Edit:
You can also mess around with the speed of the animation. In this demo (http://jsfiddle.net/adjit/XYU34/1/) I set the speed to 1000 so the next element starts fading in before the last element was done fading in. Makes it look a little smoother.
Instead of using a for loop and setTimeout, would setInterval work better for what you need? Some HTML might help better understand what you're trying to achieve.
$(function() {
var box = $('.box');
var delay = 100;
var interval = setInterval(function() {
var new_box = box.clone();
$('.container').append(new_box);
new_box.fadeIn();
}, delay);
delay += 500; // Delay the next box by an extra 500ms
}, delay);
});
I want my div element to work like a timer and shows random numbers with an interval of 1s. http://jsfiddle.net/NHAvS/46/. That is my code:
var arrData = [];
for (i=0;i<1000;i++)
{
arrData.push({"bandwidth":Math.floor(Math.random() * 100)});
}
var div = document.getElementById('wrapper').innerHTML =arrData;
document.getElementById('wrapper').style.left = '200px';
document.getElementById('wrapper').style.top = '100px';
but the problem is that it only shows 1 data at a time. any idea how to fix it?
Thanks
Do this:
setInterval(myfun,1000);
var div = document.getElementById('wrapper');
function myfun(){
div.innerHTML ='bandwidth :'+Math.floor(Math.random() * 100);
}
Take a Look: http://jsfiddle.net/techsin/NHAvS/49/
Note: your example was messed up as on left side it was set to load in head which means your div would be undefined every time your script loads before your dom. so setting it to onload make it works little more. :D
Note: also you seem to be chaining functions as in jquery, but in javascript you don't do that. The functions are made to do that. i.e. div= ..getElementById..innerHtml='balbla'; would set div = bla... not element.
You're better off using jQuery and CSS to achieve your desired result. jQuery to find the element and to display the random number; and CSS instead of manually setting the position. (Obviously jQuery is just a personal choice and document.getElementById will suffice - but if you're planning on manipulating the DOM a lot, jQuery is probably a better route to take). See updated fiddle
$(function () {
var arrData = [];
for (i = 0; i < 1000; i++) {
arrData.push({
"bandwidth": Math.floor(Math.random() * 100)
});
}
var index = 0;
setInterval(function(){
$("#wrapper").text(arrData[index].bandwidth);
index++;
}, 1000);
});
You can do it like this:
var delay = 1000, // 1000 ms = 1 sec
i;
setTimeout(function() {
document.getElementById('wrapper').innerHTML = arrData[i];
i++;
}, delay);
$(document).ready(function fadeIt() {
$("#cool_content > div").hide();
var sizeLoop = $("#cool_content > div").length;
var startLoop = 0;
$("#cool_content > div").first().eq(startLoop).fadeIn(500);
setInterval(function () {
$("#cool_content > div").eq(startLoop).fadeOut(1000);
if (startLoop == sizeLoop) {
startLoop = 0
} else {
startLoop++;
}
$("#cool_content > div").eq(startLoop).fadeIn(1500);
}, 2000);
});
Here I want a class of divs to animate, infinitely!
However, because the interval is set to two seconds there is period where no div is showing!
What would be an appropriate way to loop the animation of these divs?
I thought about using a for loop but couldn't figure out how to pass a class of divs as arguments. All your help is appreciated.
Thanks!
Ok, generally, you should know that Javascript is a single threaded environment. Along with this, the timer events are generally not on time accurately. I'm not sure how jQuery is doing fadeIn and fadeOut, but if it's not using CSS3 transitions, it's going to be using timeOut and Intervals. So basically, there's a lot of timer's going on.
If you go with the for loop on this one, you'd be blocking the single thread, so that's not the way to go forward. You'd have to do the fade in/out by yourself in the setInterval.
Setting the opacity on each interval call. Like div.css('opacity', (opacity -= 10) + '%')
If you're trying to fade in and out sequentially, I think maybe this code would help
var opacity = 100,
isFadingIn = false;
window.setInterval(function() {
if (isFadingIn) {
opacity += 10;
if (opacity === 100) isFadingIn = false;
} else {
opacity -= 10;
if (opacity === 0) isFadingIn = true;
}
$('#coolContent > div').css('opacity', opacity + '%');
}, 2000);
Consider the following JavaScript / jQuery:
$(function(){
var divs = $('#cool_content > div').hide();
var curDiv;
var counter = 0;
var doUpdate = function(){
// Hide any old div
if (curDiv)
curDiv.fadeOut(1000);
// Show the new div
curDiv = divs.eq(counter);
curDiv.fadeIn(1000);
// Increment the counter
counter = ++counter % divs.length;
};
doUpdate();
setInterval(doUpdate, 2000);
});
This loops infinitely through the divs. It's also more efficient than your code because it only queries the DOM for the list of divs once.
Update: Forked fiddle
instead of
if (startLoop == sizeLoop)
{
startLoop = 0
}
else
{
startLoop++;
}
use
startLoop =(startLoop+1)%sizeLoop;
Check the demo http://jsfiddle.net/JvdU9/ - 1st div is being animated just immediately after 4th disappears.
UPD:
Not sure I've undestood your question, but I'll try to answer :)
It doesn't matter how many divs you are being looped - 4, 5 or 10, since number of frames are being calculated automatically
x=(x+1)%n means that x will never be greater than n-1: x>=0 and x<n.
x=(x+1)%n is just shorten equivalent for
if(x<n-1)
x++;
else
x=0;
as for me first variant is much readable:)
And sorry, I gave you last time wrong demo. Correct one - http://jsfiddle.net/JvdU9/2/
I want to display several images of the same size at the same position, one at a time, with a 5s interval between each change. To do so I've used jQuery.Timer, that uses setInterval() to call some show_next_image() function every 5s.
It actually does work with IE, Opera, Safara, Firefox and.. partly with Google Chrome. It's not working with Google Chrome if I open a new window and directly type my website URL: it'll show the second image and stop. And with any other situation (reload, from another link, not right after opening a new window) it'll badly work: one can see the back image before the front image is shown.
Thus I'm wondering whether I've done something wrong with my JavaScript source. What I do is I use a front and a back image. When I want to show the next image, the back img source is set to the new image, and the front image is faded out while the back one is faded in through jQuery. You can check it out at http://www.laurent-carbon.com/ (in French). The two img are identified with bg1 and bg2.
var images = ["/img/IMG_0435bg.jpg", "/img/IMG_0400bg.jpg", "/img/maisonnette 2.jpg", "/img/IMG_0383bg.jpg", "/img/IMG_0409bg.jpg", "/img/IMG_0384bg.jpg"];
var idx = 1;
var waitTime = 5000; // ms
$(document).ready(function() {
$("#bg2").hide();
$.timer(waitTime, load_next);
$.preLoadImages(images);
});
function load_next(timer) {
var toshow = images[idx];
idx++;
idx %= images.length;
back_image().attr('src', toshow);
swap_images();
}
function front_image() {
return (idx % 2 == 0) ? $("#bg1") : $("#bg2");
}
function back_image() {
return (idx % 2 == 0) ? $("#bg2") : $("#bg1");
}
function swap_images() {
back_image().fadeOut('slow');
front_image().fadeIn('slow');
}
Thanks,
Ceylo
Ok I've worked out a solution .... without the use of plugins.
Demo
http://jsfiddle.net/morrison/PvPXM/9/show
source
http://jsfiddle.net/morrison/PvPXM/9/
This approach is a lot cleaner and removes the problem I had while viewing your page in chrome: the animation getting out of sync and flashing.
The only thing you have to do in the HTML is wrap the two images in a <div id="fadeBox" style="position:relative"></div>
$(function() {
var images = [
"http://www.laurent-carbon.com/img/IMG_0435bg.jpg",
"http://www.laurent-carbon.com/img/IMG_0400bg.jpg",
"http://www.laurent-carbon.com/img/maisonnette 2.jpg",
"http://www.laurent-carbon.com/img/IMG_0383bg.jpg",
"http://www.laurent-carbon.com/img/IMG_0409bg.jpg",
"http://www.laurent-carbon.com/img/IMG_0384bg.jpg"
];
var idx = 1;
var max = images.length;
var easing = "swing";
var waitTime = 5000; // ms
var fadeTime = 2000; // ms
var fadeShow = function(fadeTime, fadeDelay) {
var $topImage = $("#fadeBox img:last");
$topImage.fadeTo(fadeDelay, 1, function() {
$topImage.fadeTo(fadeTime, 0, easing, function() {
$topImage
.fadeTo(0, 1)
.insertBefore("#fadeBox img:first")
.attr("src", images[++idx == max ? idx = 0 : idx]);
fadeShow(fadeTime, fadeDelay);
});
});
};
fadeShow(fadeTime, waitTime);
});
Hope this helps
PS thanks to Levi for cleaning the code up a bit.
Answer: http://jsfiddle.net/morrison/RxyZY/
Notes:
You are trying to reinvent the wheel. You are creating a simple slideshow. There are numerous plugins to do exactly this and much more. I used jQuery cycle in my example, which is extremely customizable.
You should wrap your stuff up in a function, creating an expression. In my example, the (function($){}(jQuery)) is what does the trick. It scopes your variables to the function, rather than the global namespace.