We Keep Coding

JavaScript function for multi-level spread syntax

I'm working with a JavaScript object that gives the default values for a library I am working with
const defaults = {
alpha: alpha_val,
beta: {
a: {
i: beta_a_i_val,
ii: beta_a_ii_val,
},
c: beta_c_val,
},
gamma: gamma_val,
};
So far, I've been overriding the defaults in the following way
const override = {
...defaults,
beta: {
...defaults.beta,
a: {
...defaults.beta.a,
i: beta_a_i_newval,
},
},
gamma: gamma_newval,
};
While this works, the true defaults object is quite large and so overrides of many values becomes tedious and ugly.
I'm wondering if there is a way to write a function to do this sort of "deep spread" automatically?
So, creating the override object above, for example, would look something like this:
const newvals = {
beta: {
a: {
i: beta_a_i_newval,
},
},
gamma: gamma_newval,
};
const overrides = someFunction(defaults, newVals)
It seems like this would be a common requirement, but I've been having trouble finding a way to actually do this. I'm very new to JavaScript, so any advice is greatly appreciated!

Yes, you can write a function that takes in the defaults object and the newvals object, and returns a new object that combines the two. One way to do this would be to use a recursive function, where you loop through the keys in the newvals object and perform a "deep spread" similar to what you did before.
Here is an example of how you could write the someFunction function:
function someFunction(defaults, newvals) {
const result = {...defaults};
for (const key of Object.keys(newvals)) {
if (typeof newvals[key] === 'object' && newvals[key] !== null) {
result[key] = someFunction(defaults[key], newvals[key]);
} else {
result[key] = newvals[key];
}
}
return result;
}
This function works by creating a new object called result that is a shallow copy of the defaults object. It then loops through the keys in the newvals object and checks if the value is an object. If it is, it calls the someFunction function recursively to merge the two objects. If the value is not an object, it simply assigns the new value to the key in the result object.
You can then use the someFunction function like this:
const overrides = someFunction(defaults, newVals);
function someFunction(defaults, newvals) {
const result = {...defaults};
for (const key of Object.keys(newvals)) {
if (typeof newvals[key] === 'object' && newvals[key] !== null) {
result[key] = someFunction(defaults[key], newvals[key]);
} else {
result[key] = newvals[key];
}
}
return result;
}
const newvals = {
beta: {
a: {
i: "beta_a_i_newval",
},
},
gamma: "gamma_newval",
};
const defaults = {
alpha: "alpha_val",
beta: {
a: {
i: "beta_a_i_val",
ii: "beta_a_ii_val",
},
c: "beta_c_val",
},
gamma: "gamma_val",
};
override = someFunction(defaults,newvals);
console.log(override)

You can use the lodash _.merge function for that:
const myFunc(options_){
const options = {}
const defaultOptions = {}
_.merge(options, defaultOptions)
// ... the rest of your myFunc code
}
From the docs:
it recursively merges own and inherited enumerable string keyed
properties of source objects into the destination object. Source
properties that resolve to undefined are skipped if a destination
value exists. Array and plain object properties are merged
recursively. Other objects and value types are overridden by
assignment. Source objects are applied from left to right. Subsequent
sources overwrite property assignments of previous sources.
generally, _.merge is the way I merge defaults and user options in the arguments in every JavaScript module I build.
I almost never write a project without using this method.
except that I have made a wrapper for it, which returns a new object instead of mutating the original one, and I've used _.mergeWith to only merge POJOs and not arrays. because this merges the arrays and not only the objects.
You can do the same if you wanted to.

What you are looking for is a recursive function that iterates an object and calls itself for each child object:
const defaults = {
alpha: "alpha_val",
beta: {
a: {
i: "beta_a_i_val",
ii: "beta_a_ii_val",
iii: "blah",
},
c: "beta_c_val",
},
d: null,
gamma: "gamma_val",
};
const newvals = {
beta: {
a: {
i: "beta_a_i_newval",
iii: null,
},
},
d: "blah",
gamma: "gamma_newval",
};
const result = cloneObj(defaults, newvals);
//make sure none of the original objects are affected
result.beta.a.test = "ok";
console.log("defaults", defaults);
console.log("newvals", newvals);
console.log("result", result);
function cloneObj(def, obj)
{
const ret = {};
//iterate through the default object
for(let key in def)
{
// get new value
let val = obj[key];
if (val === undefined)
val = def[key]; //fallback to default value
//if it's an object and not a NULL call itself
if (val && val instanceof Object)
val = cloneObj(def[key], val);
ret[key] = val;
}
return ret;
}

How to get access to function args [duplicate]

In PHP there is func_num_args and func_get_args, is there something similar for JavaScript?

For modern Javascript or Typescript:
class Foo {
reallyCoolMethodISwear(...args) { return args.length; }
}
function reallyCoolFunction(i, ...args) { return args[i]; }
const allHailTheLambda = (...args) => {
return args.constructor == Array;
};
const x = new Foo().reallyCoolMethodISwear(0, 1, 2, 3, 4);
const y = reallyCoolFunction(3, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6);
const z = allHailTheLambda(43110, "world");
console.log(x, y, z); // 5 3 true
For ancient Javascript:
Use arguments. You can access it like an array. Use arguments.length for the number of arguments.

The arguments is an array-like object (not an actual array). Example function...
function testArguments () // <-- notice no arguments specified
{
console.log(arguments); // outputs the arguments to the console
var htmlOutput = "";
for (var i=0; i < arguments.length; i++) {
htmlOutput += '<li>' + arguments[i] + '</li>';
}
document.write('<ul>' + htmlOutput + '</ul>');
}
Try it out...
testArguments("This", "is", "a", "test"); // outputs ["This","is","a","test"]
testArguments(1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9); // outputs [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]
The full details: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/JavaScript/Reference/Functions_and_function_scope/arguments

ES6 allows a construct where a function argument is specified with a "..." notation such as
function testArgs (...args) {
// Where you can test picking the first element
console.log(args[0]);
}

The arguments object is where the functions arguments are stored.
The arguments object acts and looks like an array, it basically is, it just doesn't have the methods that arrays do, for example:
Array.forEach(callback[, thisArg]);
Array.map(callback[, thisArg])
Array.filter(callback[, thisArg]);
Array.slice(begin[, end])
Array.indexOf(searchElement[, fromIndex])
I think the best way to convert a arguments object to a real Array is like so:
argumentsArray = [].slice.apply(arguments);
That will make it an array;
reusable:
function ArgumentsToArray(args) {
return [].slice.apply(args);
}
(function() {
args = ArgumentsToArray(arguments);
args.forEach(function(value) {
console.log('value ===', value);
});
})('name', 1, {}, 'two', 3)
result:
> value === name
> value === 1
> value === Object {}
> value === two
> value === 3

You can also convert it to an array if you prefer. If Array generics are available:
var args = Array.slice(arguments)
Otherwise:
var args = Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments);
from Mozilla MDN:
You should not slice on arguments because it prevents optimizations in
JavaScript engines (V8 for example).

As many other pointed out, arguments contains all the arguments passed to a function.
If you want to call another function with the same args, use apply
Example:
var is_debug = true;
var debug = function() {
if (is_debug) {
console.log.apply(console, arguments);
}
}
debug("message", "another argument")

Similar answer to Gunnar, with more complete example:
You can even transparently return the whole thing:
function dumpArguments(...args) {
for (var i = 0; i < args.length; i++)
console.log(args[i]);
return args;
}
dumpArguments("foo", "bar", true, 42, ["yes", "no"], { 'banana': true });
Output:
foo
bar
true
42
["yes","no"]
{"banana":true}
https://codepen.io/fnocke/pen/mmoxOr?editors=0010

Yes if you have no idea that how many arguments are possible at the time of function declaration then you can declare the function with no parameters and can access all variables by arguments array which are passed at the time of function calling.

In ES6 you can do something like this:
function foo(...args)
{
let [a,b,...c] = args;
console.log(a,b,c);
}
foo(1, null,"x",true, undefined);

Hope this helps:
function x(...args) {
console.log( {...[...args] } );
}
x({a:1,b:2}, 'test');
Output:
{ '0': { a: 1, b: 2 }, '1': 'test' }

Hope this could be the helpful code:
function lazyLoadIcons(){
for(let i = 0; i < arguments.length; i++) {
var elements = document.querySelectorAll(arguments[i]);
elements.forEach(function(item){
item.classList.add('loaded');
});
}
}
lazyLoadIcons('.simple-2col', '.ftr-blue-ad', '.btm-numb');
~ Rahul Daksh

In ES6, use Array.from:
function foo()
{
foo.bar = Array.from(arguments);
foo.baz = foo.bar.join();
}
foo(1,2,3,4,5,6,7);
foo.bar // Array [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]
foo.baz // "1,2,3,4,5,6,7"
For non-ES6 code, use JSON.stringify and JSON.parse:
function foo()
{
foo.bar = JSON.stringify(arguments);
foo.baz = JSON.parse(foo.bar);
}
/* Atomic Data */
foo(1,2,3,4,5,6,7);
foo.bar // "{"0":1,"1":2,"2":3,"3":4,"4":5,"5":6,"6":7}"
foo.baz // [object Object]
/* Structured Data */
foo({1:2},[3,4],/5,6/,Date())
foo.bar //"{"0":{"1":2},"1":[3,4],"2":{},"3":"Tue Dec 17 2013 16:25:44 GMT-0800 (Pacific Standard Time)"}"
foo.baz // [object Object]
If preservation is needed instead of stringification, use the internal structured cloning algorithm.
If DOM nodes are passed, use XMLSerializer as in an unrelated question.
with (new XMLSerializer()) {serializeToString(document.documentElement) }
If running as a bookmarklet, you may need to wrap the each structured data argument in an Error constructor for JSON.stringify to work properly.
References
Structure Clone CommonJS Module
JS Object Clone
MDN: Array.from()

How to get length of array in JavaScript [duplicate]

I have a JavaScript object. Is there a built-in or accepted best practice way to get the length of this object?
const myObject = new Object();
myObject["firstname"] = "Gareth";
myObject["lastname"] = "Simpson";
myObject["age"] = 21;

Updated answer
Here's an update as of 2016 and widespread deployment of ES5 and beyond. For IE9+ and all other modern ES5+ capable browsers, you can use Object.keys() so the above code just becomes:
var size = Object.keys(myObj).length;
This doesn't have to modify any existing prototype since Object.keys() is now built-in.
Edit: Objects can have symbolic properties that can not be returned via Object.key method. So the answer would be incomplete without mentioning them.
Symbol type was added to the language to create unique identifiers for object properties. The main benefit of the Symbol type is the prevention of overwrites.
Object.keys or Object.getOwnPropertyNames does not work for symbolic properties. To return them you need to use Object.getOwnPropertySymbols.
var person = {
[Symbol('name')]: 'John Doe',
[Symbol('age')]: 33,
"occupation": "Programmer"
};
const propOwn = Object.getOwnPropertyNames(person);
console.log(propOwn.length); // 1
let propSymb = Object.getOwnPropertySymbols(person);
console.log(propSymb.length); // 2
Older answer
The most robust answer (i.e. that captures the intent of what you're trying to do while causing the fewest bugs) would be:
Object.size = function(obj) {
var size = 0,
key;
for (key in obj) {
if (obj.hasOwnProperty(key)) size++;
}
return size;
};
// Get the size of an object
const myObj = {}
var size = Object.size(myObj);
There's a sort of convention in JavaScript that you don't add things to Object.prototype, because it can break enumerations in various libraries. Adding methods to Object is usually safe, though.

If you know you don't have to worry about hasOwnProperty checks, you can use the Object.keys() method in this way:
Object.keys(myArray).length

Updated: If you're using Underscore.js (recommended, it's lightweight!), then you can just do
_.size({one : 1, two : 2, three : 3});
=> 3
If not, and you don't want to mess around with Object properties for whatever reason, and are already using jQuery, a plugin is equally accessible:
$.assocArraySize = function(obj) {
// http://stackoverflow.com/a/6700/11236
var size = 0, key;
for (key in obj) {
if (obj.hasOwnProperty(key)) size++;
}
return size;
};

Here's the most cross-browser solution.
This is better than the accepted answer because it uses native Object.keys if exists.
Thus, it is the fastest for all modern browsers.
if (!Object.keys) {
Object.keys = function (obj) {
var arr = [],
key;
for (key in obj) {
if (obj.hasOwnProperty(key)) {
arr.push(key);
}
}
return arr;
};
}
Object.keys(obj).length;

Simply use this to get the length:
Object.keys(myObject).length

I'm not a JavaScript expert, but it looks like you would have to loop through the elements and count them since Object doesn't have a length method:
var element_count = 0;
for (e in myArray) { if (myArray.hasOwnProperty(e)) element_count++; }
#palmsey: In fairness to the OP, the JavaScript documentation actually explicitly refer to using variables of type Object in this manner as "associative arrays".

This method gets all your object's property names in an array, so you can get the length of that array which is equal to your object's keys' length.
Object.getOwnPropertyNames({"hi":"Hi","msg":"Message"}).length; // => 2

To not mess with the prototype or other code, you could build and extend your own object:
function Hash(){
var length=0;
this.add = function(key, val){
if(this[key] == undefined)
{
length++;
}
this[key]=val;
};
this.length = function(){
return length;
};
}
myArray = new Hash();
myArray.add("lastname", "Simpson");
myArray.add("age", 21);
alert(myArray.length()); // will alert 2
If you always use the add method, the length property will be correct. If you're worried that you or others forget about using it, you could add the property counter which the others have posted to the length method, too.
Of course, you could always overwrite the methods. But even if you do, your code would probably fail noticeably, making it easy to debug. ;)

We can find the length of Object by using:
const myObject = {};
console.log(Object.values(myObject).length);

Here's how and don't forget to check that the property is not on the prototype chain:
var element_count = 0;
for(var e in myArray)
if(myArray.hasOwnProperty(e))
element_count++;

Here is a completely different solution that will only work in more modern browsers (Internet Explorer 9+, Chrome, Firefox 4+, Opera 11.60+, and Safari 5.1+)
See this jsFiddle.
Setup your associative array class
/**
* #constructor
*/
AssociativeArray = function () {};
// Make the length property work
Object.defineProperty(AssociativeArray.prototype, "length", {
get: function () {
var count = 0;
for (var key in this) {
if (this.hasOwnProperty(key))
count++;
}
return count;
}
});
Now you can use this code as follows...
var a1 = new AssociativeArray();
a1["prop1"] = "test";
a1["prop2"] = 1234;
a1["prop3"] = "something else";
alert("Length of array is " + a1.length);

If you need an associative data structure that exposes its size, better use a map instead of an object.
const myMap = new Map();
myMap.set("firstname", "Gareth");
myMap.set("lastname", "Simpson");
myMap.set("age", 21);
console.log(myMap.size); // 3

Use Object.keys(myObject).length to get the length of object/array
var myObject = new Object();
myObject["firstname"] = "Gareth";
myObject["lastname"] = "Simpson";
myObject["age"] = 21;
console.log(Object.keys(myObject).length); //3

Use:
var myArray = new Object();
myArray["firstname"] = "Gareth";
myArray["lastname"] = "Simpson";
myArray["age"] = 21;
obj = Object.keys(myArray).length;
console.log(obj)

<script>
myObj = {"key1" : "Hello", "key2" : "Goodbye"};
var size = Object.keys(myObj).length;
console.log(size);
</script>
<p id="myObj">The number of <b>keys</b> in <b>myObj</b> are: <script>document.write(size)</script></p>
This works for me:
var size = Object.keys(myObj).length;

For some cases it is better to just store the size in a separate variable. Especially, if you're adding to the array by one element in one place and can easily increment the size. It would obviously work much faster if you need to check the size often.

The simplest way is like this:
Object.keys(myobject).length
Where myobject is the object of what you want the length of.

#palmsey: In fairness to the OP, the JavaScript documentation actually explicitly refer to using variables of type Object in this manner as "associative arrays".
And in fairness to #palmsey he was quite correct. They aren't associative arrays; they're definitely objects :) - doing the job of an associative array. But as regards to the wider point, you definitely seem to have the right of it according to this rather fine article I found:
JavaScript “Associative Arrays” Considered Harmful
But according to all this, the accepted answer itself is bad practice?
Specify a prototype size() function for Object
If anything else has been added to Object .prototype, then the suggested code will fail:
<script type="text/javascript">
Object.prototype.size = function () {
var len = this.length ? --this.length : -1;
for (var k in this)
len++;
return len;
}
Object.prototype.size2 = function () {
var len = this.length ? --this.length : -1;
for (var k in this)
len++;
return len;
}
var myArray = new Object();
myArray["firstname"] = "Gareth";
myArray["lastname"] = "Simpson";
myArray["age"] = 21;
alert("age is " + myArray["age"]);
alert("length is " + myArray.size());
</script>
I don't think that answer should be the accepted one as it can't be trusted to work if you have any other code running in the same execution context. To do it in a robust fashion, surely you would need to define the size method within myArray and check for the type of the members as you iterate through them.

If we have the hash
hash = {"a" : "b", "c": "d"};
we can get the length using the length of the keys which is the length of the hash:
keys(hash).length

Using the Object.entries method to get length is one way of achieving it
const objectLength = obj => Object.entries(obj).length;
const person = {
id: 1,
name: 'John',
age: 30
}
const car = {
type: 2,
color: 'red',
}
console.log(objectLength(person)); // 3
console.log(objectLength(car)); // 2

var myObject = new Object();
myObject["firstname"] = "Gareth";
myObject["lastname"] = "Simpson";
myObject["age"] = 21;
Object.values(myObject).length
Object.entries(myObject).length
Object.keys(myObject).length

What about something like this --
function keyValuePairs() {
this.length = 0;
function add(key, value) { this[key] = value; this.length++; }
function remove(key) { if (this.hasOwnProperty(key)) { delete this[key]; this.length--; }}
}

If you are using AngularJS 1.x you can do things the AngularJS way by creating a filter and using the code from any of the other examples such as the following:
// Count the elements in an object
app.filter('lengthOfObject', function() {
return function( obj ) {
var size = 0, key;
for (key in obj) {
if (obj.hasOwnProperty(key)) size++;
}
return size;
}
})
Usage
In your controller:
$scope.filterResult = $filter('lengthOfObject')($scope.object)
Or in your view:
<any ng-expression="object | lengthOfObject"></any>

const myObject = new Object();
myObject["firstname"] = "Gareth";
myObject["lastname"] = "Simpson";
myObject["age"] = 21;
console.log(Object.keys(myObject).length)
// o/p 3

A variation on some of the above is:
var objLength = function(obj){
var key,len=0;
for(key in obj){
len += Number( obj.hasOwnProperty(key) );
}
return len;
};
It is a bit more elegant way to integrate hasOwnProp.

If you don't care about supporting Internet Explorer 8 or lower, you can easily get the number of properties in an object by applying the following two steps:
Run either Object.keys() to get an array that contains the names of only those properties that are enumerable or Object.getOwnPropertyNames() if you want to also include the names of properties that are not enumerable.
Get the .length property of that array.
If you need to do this more than once, you could wrap this logic in a function:
function size(obj, enumerablesOnly) {
return enumerablesOnly === false ?
Object.getOwnPropertyNames(obj).length :
Object.keys(obj).length;
}
How to use this particular function:
var myObj = Object.create({}, {
getFoo: {},
setFoo: {}
});
myObj.Foo = 12;
var myArr = [1,2,5,4,8,15];
console.log(size(myObj)); // Output : 1
console.log(size(myObj, true)); // Output : 1
console.log(size(myObj, false)); // Output : 3
console.log(size(myArr)); // Output : 6
console.log(size(myArr, true)); // Output : 6
console.log(size(myArr, false)); // Output : 7
See also this Fiddle for a demo.

Here's a different version of James Cogan's answer. Instead of passing an argument, just prototype out the Object class and make the code cleaner.
Object.prototype.size = function () {
var size = 0,
key;
for (key in this) {
if (this.hasOwnProperty(key)) size++;
}
return size;
};
var x = {
one: 1,
two: 2,
three: 3
};
x.size() === 3;
jsfiddle example: http://jsfiddle.net/qar4j/1/

You can always do Object.getOwnPropertyNames(myObject).length to get the same result as [].length would give for normal array.

You can simply use Object.keys(obj).length on any object to get its length. Object.keys returns an array containing all of the object keys (properties) which can come in handy for finding the length of that object using the length of the corresponding array. You can even write a function for this. Let's get creative and write a method for it as well (along with a more convienient getter property):
function objLength(obj)
{
return Object.keys(obj).length;
}
console.log(objLength({a:1, b:"summit", c:"nonsense"}));
// Works perfectly fine
var obj = new Object();
obj['fish'] = 30;
obj['nullified content'] = null;
console.log(objLength(obj));
// It also works your way, which is creating it using the Object constructor
Object.prototype.getLength = function() {
return Object.keys(this).length;
}
console.log(obj.getLength());
// You can also write it as a method, which is more efficient as done so above
Object.defineProperty(Object.prototype, "length", {get:function(){
return Object.keys(this).length;
}});
console.log(obj.length);
// probably the most effictive approach is done so and demonstrated above which sets a getter property called "length" for objects which returns the equivalent value of getLength(this) or this.getLength()

A nice way to achieve this (Internet Explorer 9+ only) is to define a magic getter on the length property:
Object.defineProperty(Object.prototype, "length", {
get: function () {
return Object.keys(this).length;
}
});
And you can just use it like so:
var myObj = { 'key': 'value' };
myObj.length;
It would give 1.

Conditionally adding properties to JavaScript object

Is there a more concise or readable way of doing this?
var foo={a:111,c:333, somePropertyThatShouldntBeAdded:'xxx'};
var myobj={x:1,y:2,z:3};
if(foo.a){myobj.a=foo.a;}
if(foo.b){myobj.b=foo.b;}
if(foo.c){myobj.c=foo.c;}
EDIT. Context why I am doing this is below.
var obj={value:this.text,css:{color:'#929292',margin:'1px 0px'}};
if(this.width){obj.css.width=this.width;}
if(this.type){obj.type=this.type;}
if(this.id){obj.id=this.id;}
var input=$('<input/>',obj)

You could use a simple loop-based approach:
var foo={a:111,c:333, somePropertyThatShouldntBeAdded:'xxx'};
var myobj={x:1,y:2,z:3};
['a','b','c'].forEach(function(key) {
if(key in foo) {
myobj[key] = foo[key];
}
});
Notice how I used the in keyword. Your current solution will not work if the value of a property is (e.g.) false or 0.
Additionaly, to get better solutions, provide some context: why are you conditionally copying properties? Perhaps you can avoid this to begin with.

With the introduction of the spread operator in ES2018 you can do something like this.
const original = {
first: null,
second: 'truthy'
};
const conditionalObject = {
...( original.first && { first: original.first }),
...( original.second && { second: original.second })
};
In the conditionalObject we first check if the property we want to add from the original is truthy, if it is we spread that property with its value into the new object.
If the property from the original object is falsy, the && short circuits and the property is never spread into the new object.
You can read a more detailed explanation here
The new conditionalObject will look like this
{
second: 'truthy'
}

You can use the ternary operator like this:
myobj.a = foo.a ? foo.a : undefined;
Though its not exactly the same as the if statement you have, because you'll have {a: undefined} instead of {}. The difference would show up if you ever enumerated the keys of your object.
Edit:
#hindmost has a good suggestion in the comments. You could improve it further with underscore.js:
_.extend(myobj, _.pick(foo, ['a', 'b', 'c']));

You could use jQuery's extend, then delete the properties you don't want:
function extendExcept(sourceObject, targetObject, except) {
var target = $.extend(sourceObject, targetObject);
except.forEach(function(key) {
delete target[key];
});
return target;
}
You could call it like:
var foo={a:111,c:333, somePropertyThatShouldntBeAdded:'xxx'};
var myobj={x:1,y:2,z:3};
myobj = extendExcept(foo, myobj, ["somePropertyThatShouldntBeAdded"]);
Working Example

var foo = {
a: 111,
c: 333,
somePropertyThatShouldntBeAdded: 'xxx'
};
var myObj = {
x: 1,
y: 2,
z: 3
};
for(var key in foo) {
if(key === 'somePropertyThatShouldntBeAdded') {
continue;
}
myObj[key] = foo[key];
}

Set of objects in javascript

I'd like to have a set of objects in Javascript. That is, a data structure that contains only unique objects.
Normally using properties is recommended, e.g. myset["key"] = true. However, I need the keys to be objects. I've read that Javascript casts property names to strings, so I guess I can't use myset[myobject] = true.
I could use an array, but I need something better than O(n) performance for adding, finding and removing items.
It needs to be able to tell objects apart by reference only, so given:
var a = {};
var b = {};
then both a and b should be able to be added, because they're separate objects.
Basically, I'm after something like C++'s std::set, that can store Javascript objects. Any ideas?

ES6 provides a native Set:
let s = new Set();
let a = {};
let b = {};
s.add(a);
console.log(s.has(a)); // true
console.log(s.has(b)); // false

Here's a mad suggestion ... key it on the result of JSON.stringify(object)

It's not possible for all objects, but if your object has a .toString() method implemented, it is:
var x = {toString: function(){ return 'foo'; }};
var y = {toString: function(){ return 'bar'; }};
var obj = {};
obj[x] = 'X';
obj[y] = 'Y';
console.log(obj);
// { foo: 'X', bar: 'Y' }
If you want to make this easier, make it a class:
function myObj(name){
this.name = name;
}
myObj.prototype.toString = function(){ return this.name; }
var obj = {};
obj[new myObj('foo')] = 'X';
obj[new myObj('bar')] = 'Y';

I'm answering my own question, but I came up with an alternative solution I thought was interesting and thought it would be useful to share it.
cwolves' answer gave me an idea. Providing an object's toString() method uniquely identifies the instance, properties of an object can be used to store a set of objects. Essentially, to store object x, you can use items[x.toString()] = x;. Note that the value is the object itself, so then the set of objects can be extracted by looking at all item's properties and dumping all the values in to an array.
Here's the class, which I call ObjectSet, in full. It requires objects are uniquely identified by their toString() method, which is OK for my purposes. add, remove and contains should all run in better than O(n) time - whatever javascript's property access efficiency is, which hopefully is either O(1) or O(n log n).
// Set of objects. Requires a .toString() overload to distinguish objects.
var ObjectSet = function ()
{
this.items = {};
this.item_count = 0;
};
ObjectSet.prototype.contains = function (x)
{
return this.items.hasOwnProperty(x.toString());
};
ObjectSet.prototype.add = function (x)
{
if (!this.contains(x))
{
this.items[x.toString()] = x;
this.item_count++;
}
return this;
};
ObjectSet.prototype.remove = function (x)
{
if (this.contains(x))
{
delete this.items[x.toString()];
this.item_count--;
}
return this;
};
ObjectSet.prototype.clear = function ()
{
this.items = {};
this.item_count = 0;
return this;
};
ObjectSet.prototype.isEmpty = function ()
{
return this.item_count === 0;
};
ObjectSet.prototype.count = function ()
{
return this.item_count;
};
ObjectSet.prototype.values = function ()
{
var i, ret = [];
for (i in this.items)
{
if (this.items.hasOwnProperty(i))
ret.push(this.items[i]);
}
return ret;
};

I used Map, solved my case
const objectsMap = new Map();
const placesName = [
{ place: "here", name: "stuff" },
{ place: "there", name: "morestuff" },
{ place: "there", name: "morestuff" },
];
placesName.forEach((object) => {
objectsMap.set(object.place, object);
});
console.log(objectsMap);

For what you're trying to do (sets of objects), there is no native Javascript implementation. You would have to implement this on your own. One way to do this would be to implement a hashing function for your objects. The backing data-type of the set would be an associative array, where the key of the array is the value you get from calling the object's hash function, and the value of the array is the object itself.
Of course, this doesn't address the issue that you highlighted, so you will need to take equality into account as well (implement an equals function perhaps)?
Instead of making the hash function a property of the object itself, you can have a standalone hash function that takes in an object as input and generates a hash value (presumably by iterating over its properties).
Using this method you should be able to get O(1) for insertion, searching, and removing (not counting the order of the hash function, which shouldn't be any worse than O(n), especially if you are iterating over its properties to create your hashed value).

ECMAScript6 Set should behave like that:
Standard: http://www.ecma-international.org/ecma-262/6.0/#sec-set-o-p-v-throw
Unofficial ES6 cheat sheet: https://github.com/lukehoban/es6features#map--set--weakmap--weakset
Working example on Firefox 32 (but not implemented in Chromium 37):
if (Set) {
var s = new Set()
var a = {}
var b = {}
var c = {}
s.add(a)
s.add(b)
s.add(b)
assert(s.size === 2)
assert(s.has(a))
assert(s.has(b))
assert(!s.has(c))
}
This is not surprising since {} != {}: equality compares object addresses by default.
A module that implements it for browsers without support: https://github.com/medikoo/es6-set

Javascript Set's don't do deep object comparison.
Using lodash, this is a unique array with deep object comparison:
const objects = [{ 'x': 1, 'y': 2 }, { 'x': 2, 'y': 1 }, { 'x': 1, 'y': 2 }];
_.uniqWith(objects, _.isEqual);

Just typed this up, it's only briefly tested:
var Set = function Set()
{
var list = [];
var contains;
this.contains = contains = function(x) {
return list.indexOf(x) >= 0;
}
var put;
this.put = put = function(x) {
if (!contains(x))
list.push(x);
return this;
}
var remove;
this.remove = remove = function(x)
{
var idx = list.indexOf(x);
if (idx >= 0)
list.splice(idx,1);
return this;
}
var all;
this.all = all = function()
{
return list.concat();
}
return this;
}

It seems that the inner call of function works when prefixed with this.
Exemple:
var put;
this.put = put = function(x) {
if (!this.contains(x))
list.push(x);
return this;
}

Please use this code as a reference.
const fruits = [
{name: 'apple', price: 100},
{name: 'apple', price: 100},
{name: 'orange', price: 200},
{name: 'grapes', price: 300}
];
const hasFruitDuplicated = () => {
const duplicatedDeleteFruits = fruits.filter((fruit, index) =>
fruits.findIndex(item => item.name === fruit.name && item.price === fruit.price) === index
);
return duplicatedDeleteFruits;
};

Given an array of the following type:
Array<{ foo: T1, bar: T2 }>
You can build a corresponding dictionary of type:
{ [foo: T1]: Set<T2> }
The look-up for { foo: fooValue, bar: barValue } can be performed as follows:
if (fooValue in dictionary && dictionary[fooValue].has(barValue))
This way we can build what would be an ObjectSet<T1, T2>
.
If you now have three elements, you can build the following dictionary:
{ [foo: T1]: ObjectSet<T2, T3> }
and extend your ObjectSet to any number of properties by induction.
That is assuming your types can be used as index signatures.