Animating opacity, opacity in general in IE - javascript

When IE renders a filter: alpha(opacity=..) whether it's on an image or text. It looks bad.
Is there a way to make IE render normal-browser-like smooth opacity?
If no, how can I easily after a fadeIn (opacity x->1) javascript animation re-render the elements so it doesn't look bad anymore..?

Applying a background colour or an opaque background image to the element should fix this problem. This is due to the way filters work, they're ActiveX components and they're old so they have certain limitations when working with partial transparency.
You can also disable the filter when the animation has completed, using something like:
myElement.filters[0].enabled = false;
A lot of animation libraries use this technique to enable the filter only during the fading so the user will not notice the ugly aliasing as much.
There's another fix (best viewed in IE to understand the point of the post), although it's more of a hack and it's not a good solution in all cases, particularly where you need to alter the size of the image.

Related

Is there a fluid CSS height property for elements entering the DOM? Jank happens when using Semantic-UI-React Transitions

I am not sure if this is the proper place to ask this question; I considered Software Recommendations however I figured I'd give it a shot here first.
I am creating a PWA and with every iteration I'd really like to focus on making it look/feel like less janky and as smooth as possible. Well, like a native app.
So here is the problem—I am using transitions (animations) provided by Semantic-UI-React, and while it works beautifully when an element which is occupying its on space, I was wondering if there a practice or pattern which handles the behavior of adjacent DOM elements to one that is being animated?
I supplied a GIF below to illustrate what I mean. I suppose I could just move the animated elements out of the container of the form to prevent jank, but I wondered if there was a more elegant pattern or approach to this...
Merci!
Unfortunately, there is no particularly elegant approach to this.
Regarding the question in the title of your post, a common approach is to animate the height of the new elements. If you don't know the height of the elements, unfortunately animating from 0px to auto does not yet work but you can fudge it by animating max-height from 0px to a value slightly larger than the maximum size you expect the element to be.
But don't do that.
It will cause the browser to layout the page on every animation frame and will almost certainly jank on lower-end devices.
Instead, you're better off to animate transform.
The most common approach is to:
Grab the original position of the elements (using getBoundingClientRect() etc.) that are going to be affected just before you add the new elements to the DOM (perhaps using getSnapshotBeforeUpdate unless you're using hooks, in which case you can use useRef to similar effect).
After you've added the new elements (which you're presumably also animating in by using transform with a suitable scale() function), calculate the delta from where the offset elements are now, compared to where they used to be.
Setup a transform animation from the negative of the delta, to zero (i.e. the FLIP approach). E.g. if the element has been shifted 300px down the page, animate transform from translateY(-300px) to none.
Of course you need to do that for all the elements in the flow that are affected so it might be easiest to put them all in one container and just animate that.
Regarding the third point you have a few choices of technology, none of which are great:
CSS transitions. These are simplest but you'll have to trigger a style flush to get the negative delta starting point to stick. e.g.
elem.style.transform = `translateY(-${offset}px)`;
elem.style.transition = `transform .3s`;
getComputedStyle(elem).transform; // Flush style
elem.style.transform = `none`;
CSS animations. Producing #keyframes rules dynamically using the CSSOM is a pain but at least you don't need to trigger a style flush (and you can set an animation with an implicit to-keyframe for convenience).
#keyframes random-id { from: { translateY(-300px); } }
Web animations. This is probably the most well-suited.
elem.animate({ transform: [ `translateY(-${offset}px)`, 'none' ] }, 300);
// In future when browsers ship support for implicit to/from keyframes:
elem.animate({ transform: `translateY(-${offset}px)`, offset: 0 }, 300);
Unfortunately Safari only has Web Animations support in Tech Preview so Safari users will get the un-animated version until the next Safari release. Edge users will also get the un-animated version until the Chromium based Edge ships. There is a polyfill too but it's not actively maintained at this point in time.
If you're using React, Animating the Unanimatable is a helpful article on all this.
The other tricky part is making sure the scroll doesn't jump for which you might need to look into scroll anchoring.

Is there a way I can force chrome to do subpixel rendering for a slow translation?

Im doing a very slow transition of a background image (a view of space that slides slowly to the left). My problem is while it looks beautiful on Firefox, it looks horrible on Chrome. I get a "jittery" effect due to Chrome's lack of subpixel rendering, and the image just snaps to the next pixel. I cannot speed the image up because it will destroy the effect Im trying to achieve. I have tried using TranslateZ() tricks, I have tried every CSS3 effect I could think of to make it look better, Ive tried Kinetic.js, Ive even tried Babylon.js hoping that WebGL would fix my problem.
At this point Im at a loss and I might just have to give Chrome users a static background and cater more to the Firefox users in regards to the neat little things I can do for the UI UX, and then just put a disclaimer on my site saying that the page is best viewed in FF.
I REALLY dont want to do this. Is there ANY work around at all?
You can force subpixel rendering by applying a small transformation:
#container {
transform: rotate(-0.0000000001deg);
-webkit-transform: rotate(-0.0000000001deg);
}
But instead of using JS to make the animation work, why not use CSS3 animations?
If you use transform: translate() browsers will use subpixel-rendering by default.
Also since the performance is better you shouldn't get your jittery/wave motion.
More info on performance here: http://www.paulirish.com/2012/why-moving-elements-with-translate-is-better-than-posabs-topleft/
I've put together a simple demo here: http://jsfiddle.net/yrwA9/6/
(For the sake of simplicity I only used the -webkit- vendor prefixes)

Repaint slowdown with CSS via Javascript in webkit browsers

I've been working on a slideshow script that uses CSS3 transitions, or jQuery's animate when they are unavailable. I've created a custom function to do the slide animations, which does so appropriately. Everything seemed to be working fine, but I've hit a major snag during testing.
For one reason or another, there is an large delay applying the jQuery CSS before and after the transition on large slideshows. For example, the slideshow in the link below is around 9900 pixels wide (container width, most of which is hidden). The container is maneuvered to display the appropriate slide, using CSS3 transition and transform properties. The delay occurs applying the CSS between lines 75 - 82 in the paste below. In particular, applying the 'transition' CSS causes the problem. Add the 'transition' CSS to the stylesheet (rather than applying it with JS), and delay disappears. This isn't really a solution however, because we only want to use CSS3 transitions on specific properties, that can vary (using 'all' in the stylesheet would transition some CSS that we don't want to animate, but change regularly).
Animation function:
http://pastebin.com/9wumQvrP
Slideshow Demo:
http://www.matthewruddy.com/demo/?p=2431
The real problem is with iOS, in which the slideshow (and even the browser sometimes) becomes completely un-usable. I can't pinpoint any errors, and have really exhausted my knowledge of debugging JS. I'm sure it is related to this section of the function after playing around a bit, and disabling CSS3 support within the plugin altogether removes the problem completely.
I'm completely stuck, and really appreciate any help anyone can give.
--- Edit ---
I've tried applying the CSS with native Javascript rather than jQuery's .css function. Same results, no better performance. Also worth noting that this isn't happening at all in Firefox, and seems to only be a problem with Webkit browsers.
Anyone with a solution, would happy to make a donation towards a few beers! I really cannot figure this out!
--- Second Edit ---
Ok, so been debugging and I can see that the slowdown is caused by the browser repaint cycle that is taking a very long time. Is there a better way to handle this that the way it is already doing? Positioning the element absolutely is a known way to reduce repaints, but that isn't really working because the slideshow is responsive. Absolutely positioning the slide images or the slides themselves causes it to collapse.
--- Third Edit ---
A day later, and I've made some progress. Adding 'transition: all 0s ease' to the elements stylesheet CSS has gotten rid of the repaint caused by adding the inline CSS transition property via the custom animation function mentioned in the original post. This causes a significant performance gain, especially when removing the inline CSS transition property when the transition itself has finished.
Good stuff! However, now there is still a slowdown when the inline CSS translate is being removed (that was used to create the hardware accelerated transition effect itself) after the transition, and the left positioning is being applied. When the two happen together, there is a slowdown.
Breaking them up into two separate tasks (the translate removed, then the left position added in a setTimeout with no time specified), again gets rid of the repaints = performance gain, and looks likes problem solved. But sometimes, the CSS transition property isn't get negated fast enough, and the translate removal gets animated. No good, and don't know where to look next to work around it.
I think the problem is you're loading HUGE images :)
They are too big for the container you have them in, so you scale them down, which is even more resource intensive.
Try resizing them.
First of all congrats for your debugging!
I have been working on the exact same stuff lately and found out that ios devices don't support a large number of images positionned in the same page. It causes crashes and the only solution I found was removing elements instead of just hiding them. The downside is that removing and appending elements causes lags so you have to do it cleverly, when your transitions are done. I thought the best way to go was keep 3 or 5 images in the DOM and replacing the rest with thumbnails of the images, resized to fit the original. When transitions are done, I'd just put the large images back into place...
Hope this helps you a bit on the ios problem at least...
After spending some time analysing your code TimeLine with Chrome Dev Tools, I believe there's some optimization you could do.
As far as I can tell, every single one of your 16 images gets fully repainted every time an animation is requested. This seems quite obvious to me, as there are 16 images in your example, and the Chrome Dev Tools reports 16 long "Paint" executions every time in hit "Next".
In my humble opinion, you should figure out a solution that considers only translating two images: the one you want to hide and the one you want to show. So, consider please, not moving the rest of the images and, instead, leaving them all side-by-side to the shown image.
One more thing, using scaled down images is probably making the paint cycles quite longer. Avoid them whenever you can.
Well, think I've managed to figure it out! Just so you know, original post links don't reflect the changes as I've done them on my localhost environment.
Absolutely positioning the slides container has fixed the problem that was occurring with repaint speeds after the transition had taken place (whilst applying CSS properties). Obviously taking them out of the DOM has done the trick, allowing painting to take place much more efficiently.
I originally didn't try this too much because I knew this would add a lot of work to the resizing functionality. I had originally intended to not resize at all in JS, and rely on percentages to do the dirty work. Absolutely positioning the container would cause the slideshow viewport to collapse, rendering the native resizing useless.
However, I was already having problems with sub-pixel rendering in other browsers anyway, so I guess it was time to bite the bullet and rely on fixed pixel values. I then used JS to handle the resizing, using the window resize event. All seems good, however the slideshow was still collapsed due to the positioning. Assigning height values wasn't working correctly, so was at a bit of a loss.
Thankfully, I came across a neat little trick of setting the 'padding-top' of the slideshow viewport to a percentage value, dynamically calculated (desired slideshow height, set in the settings panel for this script, divided by desired width). As padding-top percentages are relative to the width of the element, this did a great job of providing responsive height and correcting the viewport again (no longer looking collapsed).
Here is some info on using padding-top for responsive elements that maintain aspect ratio. Great little trick: http://f6design.com/projects/responsive-aspect-ratio/
All is good now, and things are working well in iOS and webkit browsers. Everything is extremely quick and working as it should. Four days later, and it is finally figured out. Not happy about having to resort to JS for resizing, but I guess it was always going to happen due to percentage inconsistencies between browsers. Lots of decimals = no good!
Thanks to all who tried to point me in the right direction. Definitely got me thinking, and learned a lot of debugging skills that I can use again to make sure transitions are performing well. Thanks again!
not sure if this helps or not but I noticed you use 3d translation - I would think a simple 2d translation would be enough especially since your third parameter is 0 and might accelerate the issue, also go with fewer images as Armel L. suggested, don't have an iphone to test though... alternatively, this is a solution I used before css3 but should still work move the element containing the images using javascript by modifying left (?and top - the demo only moves left and right though? without the transition effects) and this way you can fine-tune the refresh rate which I think might account for the slowdown... you can go as low as 18 fps without anyone noticing, might even be good enough with just 16fps
I had this when I was first designing a magazine carousel-style page device.
If you have a series of images within a long "tray", even if they are not within the viewport, they will still take up ram, and you can effectively have five or so before leaks and nastiness begin to happen.
What I found works is "hiding" them ... But make sure they take up the physical space necessary.
What I also found worked was that one could make the 'previous' current and 'next' image are visible and move the tray, 'unhiding' them as they reach those three positions.
In my own system, I skipped the 'tray' holding e images and only had them at -100% width, 100% width and the current one a 0.
I never had much luck with the typical long-tray carousel with large scale background images... Especially with css3 acceleration.

Is this flash effect possible with jquery?

I see a flash website with some eyecathing buttons with flash effect which I want to have with jQuery if possible here is the link of website -> http://www.goodthinking.com.ph/ .. any tips or sample if can this possible done using jquery code.. . thanks in advance.. .
Yes you could build something close, but with less browser support. The puzzle pieces could be stored as background images on <div/> elements, then the divs could be positioned to "fit" as puzzle pieces, yet still be move-able by animating their position properties with a custom jQuery $.animate({}). The noise could be played on :hover with an <audio/> element in browsers that support it, and the flip effect could be achieved using a 3D transform, typically done by adding and removing CSS classes that define webkit animation keyframes.
You should seriously consider, however whether a whizz-bang effect actually helps people find the content on the website, or gets in the way. If you do want the effect and can design it in such a way that it degrades in browsers that don't support the effect, or all of the effects, then you have a cross-browser solution that is not the same everywhere, but doesn't penalize all users either by requiring they have a browser plugin.
Is it possible? Probably yes.
Would I recommend doing it with jQuery or javascript? No.

IE GIF/PNG Transparency issue with jQuery

Ok, this is pretty weird...
Here's the page in question: http://s289116086.onlinehome.us/lawjournaltv/index.php
The main blue callout background was originally a PNG, but when I applied some jQuery trickery to it (click the numbers in the top right to see what I mean), an ugly white border appeared where the transparency should be. See this screenshot from IE8: http://skitch.com/darkdriving/n62bu/windows-xp-professional
I figured I could sacrifice the quality/flexibility of a PNG and just resaved each of the backgrounds as GIFs and set the matte color to white (for now). Well, I was proven wrong because IE is treating the GIF transparency the same as the original PNGs.
I've read here that the issue with PNGs, Javascript, and IE has something to do with multiple filters can't be applied to one image, but shouldn't GIFs be exempt from this because they lack the Alpha Channel? Is there any way to make this page look similar in IE to Firefox or Webkit browsers?
Thanks in advance!
This is a bug in IE.
No current version of IE supports the opacity CSS proeprty, so jQuery uses the Alpha filter instead. However, filters force the element to be fully opaque, so they don't work orrectly with transparent PNGs.
To use transparent PNGs in semi-transparent elements, the PNGs need to be applied using the AlphaImageLoader filter (even in IE8). For example:
if ($.browser.msie)
$(something).css({
background: 'none',
filter: 'progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.AlphaImageLoader(src="/Folder/Image.png", sizingMethod="scale"),alpha(opacity=100)'
});
(This code works; I'm using it right now)
I basically solved this by loading a different set of images (using PHP) on each page refresh. It's not as dynamic, but my attempts at using the ugly, proprietary CSS filters or other javascript-based plugins were all fruitless. In my eyes, this is clearly one of the biggest bugs I've come across in my time spent hacking away at IE. In fact, I'm suprised it took this long for me to encounter it.
Word to the wise in this case: try to back transparent imagery on a solid color or suffer the consequences in IE.

Categories